A Novel Noise Reduction Algorithm of MEMS Gyroscope Based on Compressive Sensing and Lifting Wavelet Transform

Article Preview

Abstract:

A novel noise reduction algorithm combined with compressive sensing (CS) and lifting wavelet transform (LWT) is proposed in this paper. This algorithm can overcome the limitations of traditional noise reduction methods based on Kalman filtering and wavelet threshold filtering. The characteristics of wavelet time-frequency distribution of the microelectromechanical system (MEMS) gyroscope are discussed to illustrate the demerit of the classical filtering methods. Noise reduction algorithm of MEMS gyroscope signal is studied in detail by combining CS theory with lifting wavelet transform. De-noising effect, time-consumption of computation as well as traditional CS reconstruction algorithms are analyzed. The results show that the signal reconstruction algorithm of conventional matching pursuit (MP) greedy algorithms contains more glitches and computation time-consumption, the basis pursuit de-noising (BPDN) algorithm is better and it has advantages of high computational efficiency and ease of implementation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 609-610)

Pages:

1138-1143

Citation:

Online since:

April 2014

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Wen H. Ko, Trends and frontiers of MEMS, Sensors and Actuators A Physical. 136 (2007) 62-67.

Google Scholar

[2] Masaaki Nagahara, Takahiro Matsuda and Kazunori Hayashi, Compressive sampling for remote control systems, IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals. E95-A(4) (2012) 713-722.

DOI: 10.1587/transfun.e95.a.713

Google Scholar

[3] Emmanuel J. Candès, Michael B. Wakin, An introduction to compressive sampling, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. 3 (2008) 21-30.

Google Scholar

[4] Amin Tavakoli, Ali Pourmohammad, Image denosing based on compressed sensing, International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering. 4(2) (2012) 266-268.

DOI: 10.7763/ijcte.2012.v4.463

Google Scholar

[5] Reeves G, Gastpar M, The sampling rate-distortion tradeoff for sparsity pattern recovery in compressed sensing, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 58(5) (2012) 3065-3090.

DOI: 10.1109/tit.2012.2184848

Google Scholar

[6] Rick Chartrand, Richard G. Baraniuk, Yonina C. Eldar et al, Introduction to the issue on compressive sensing, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing. 4(2) (2010) 241-243.

DOI: 10.1109/jstsp.2010.2043892

Google Scholar

[7] Marco F. Duarte, Mark A. Davenport and Dharmpal Takhar, et al. Single-pixel imaging via compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. 3 (2008) 83-90.

DOI: 10.1109/msp.2007.914730

Google Scholar

[8] Baraniuk R G, Compressive sensing, IEEE Signal ProcessingMagazine. 24(4) (2007) 118-121.

Google Scholar

[9] Daubechies I, Sweldens W, Factoring wavelet transforms into lifting steps, Journal of Fourier Analysis and Application. 4(3) (1998) 247-260.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02476026

Google Scholar