Effect of Surface Pretreatment on the Performance of Adhesive-Bonded Joints

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents a systematic investigation of the influence of sandblasting pretreatment parameters on the surface roughness and mechanical characteristics of adhesive-bonded joints. The preliminary surface treatment in a bonding process has two important aims: first of all, it eliminates contaminants (dust, grease, humidity and corrosion products) which can modify the wettability of the substrate, then it increases surface roughness and, consequently, the contact area between substrate and adhesive, creating a mechanical interlocking that maximizes adhesion. To enhance the strength and avoid the de-adhesive failure of the joint, it is therefore advisable to increase the contact substrate-adhesive by a mechanical treatment of sanding, grinding or preferably sandblasting, usually considered one of the most effective methods to control the desired level of surface roughness and joint strength. This process, apparently easy to manage, is controlled by a great number of operating parameters, which all contribute to creating a good result. With the aim of evaluating the influence that some of these parameters have on the mechanical characteristics of adhesive-bonded joints, an experimental campaign was carried out. In particular, a steel substrate, an epoxy adhesive and various types of sand, different in nature and granulometry were used. The variable parameters for the execution of blasting are sand, impact angle and pressure. The assessments departed from an investigation into their effect on surface roughness and thereafter the mechanical properties of the bonded joints were analyzed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 554-557)

Pages:

996-1006

Citation:

Online since:

June 2013

Export:

Price:

[1] F. Hayat, Comparing Properties of Adhesive Bonding, Resistance Spot Welding and Adhesive Weld Bonding of Coated and Uncoated DP 600 Steel, Journal of iron and steel research, international. 18(9) (2011) 70-78.

DOI: 10.1016/s1006-706x(12)60037-5

Google Scholar

[2] H.J. Yang, Y.S. Zhang, X.M. Lai, J. Shen, X. Zhao, P.C. Wang, Method for repairing of adhesive-bonded steel, Materials and Design 31 (2010) 260–266.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.022

Google Scholar

[3] D.R. Speth, Yu Ping Yang, G.W. Ritter, Qualification of adhesives for marine composite-to-steel applications, International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 30 (2010) 55–62.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.08.004

Google Scholar

[4] T. Sadowski, M.Kneć , P.Golewski, Experimental investigations and numerical modelling of steel adhesive joints reinforced by rivets, Int. Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 30 (2010) 338–346.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.11.004

Google Scholar

[5] S.A. Hashim, Adhesive bonding of thick steel adherends for marine structures, Marine structures 12 (1999) 405-423.

DOI: 10.1016/s0951-8339(99)00029-5

Google Scholar

[6] G. DiBella, G.Galtieri, E.Pollicino, C.Borsellino, Mechanical characterization of adhesive joints with dissimilar substrates for marine applications, Int. Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 41 (2013) 33–40.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.10.005

Google Scholar

[7] P.R. Underhill, D.L. DuQuesnay, The dependence of the fatigue life of adhesive joints on surface preparation, International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 26 (2006) 62–66.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.03.006

Google Scholar

[8] Sina Ebnesajjad, Introduction to Surface Preparation and Adhesion, in Sina Ebnesajjad, Handbook of Adhesives and Surface Preparation, Elsevier, 2011, pp.15-18.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4377-4461-3.10002-1

Google Scholar

[9] E.M. Petrie, Handbook of Adhesives and Sealants, McGraw-Hill, USA, 2000.

Google Scholar

[10] H. Pasternak, A. Schwarzlos, N. Schimmack, The application of adhesives to connect steel members, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 60 (2004) 649–658.

DOI: 10.1016/s0143-974x(03)00134-2

Google Scholar

[11] A.F. Harris, A. Beevers, The effects of grit-blasting on surface properties for adhesion, International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 19 (1999) 445–452.

DOI: 10.1016/s0143-7496(98)00061-x

Google Scholar

[11] K. Uehara, M. Sakurai, Bonding strength of adhesives and surface roughness of joined parts, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 127 (2002) 178–181.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00122-x

Google Scholar

[12] M.H. Staia, E. Ramos, A. Carrasquero, A. Roman, J. Lesage, D. Chicot, G. Mesmacque, Effect of substrate roughness induced by grit blasting upon adhesion of WC-17% Co thermal sprayed coatings, Thin Solid Films 377–378 (2000) 657–664.

DOI: 10.1016/s0040-6090(00)01447-4

Google Scholar

[13] M. Shahid, S.A. Hashim, Effect of surface roughness on the strength of cleavage joints, International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 22 (2002) 235–244.

DOI: 10.1016/s0143-7496(01)00059-8

Google Scholar

[14] K. Poorna Chander, M. Vashista, K. Sabiruddin, S. Paul, P.P. Bandyopadhyay, Effects of grit blasting on surface properties of steel substrates, Materials and Design 30 (2009) 2895–2902.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.01.014

Google Scholar

[15] M. Zou, S. Beckford, R. Wei, C. Ellis, G. Hatton, M.A. Miller, Effects of surface roughness and energy on ice adhesion strength, Applied Surface Science 257 (2011) 3786–3792.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.11.149

Google Scholar

[16] Y.-Y. Wang, C.-J. Li, A. Ohmori, Influence of substrate roughness on the bonding mechanisms of high velocity oxy-fuel sprayed coatings, Thin Solid Films 485 (2005) 141 – 147.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.03.024

Google Scholar

[17] Y. Peykova, S. Guriyanova, O.V. Lebedeva, A. Diethert, P. Müller-Buschbaum, N. Willenbacher, The effect of surface roughness on adhesive properties of acrylate copolymers, International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 30 (2010) 245–254.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.02.005

Google Scholar

[18] T. Şekercíoğlu, H. Rende, A. Gülsöz, C. Merana, The effects of surface roughness on the strength of adhesively bonded cylindrical components, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 142 (2003) 82–86.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00463-1

Google Scholar