Effect of Material Model on Finite Element Modeling of Aerospace Alloys

Article Preview

Abstract:

Increasing acceptance and use of hydroforming technology within the aerospace industry requires a comprehensive understanding of critical issues such as the material characteristics, friction condition and hydroformability of the material. Moreover, the cost of experiments that can be reduced by accurate finite element modeling (FEM), which entails the application of adapted constitutive laws for reproducing with confidence the material behavior. In this paper, the effect of different constitutive laws on FEM of tubular shapes is presented. The free expansion process was considered for developing the FEM. Bulge height, thickness reduction and strains were determined at the maximum bulge height using different constitutive models, including Hollomon, Ludwik, Swift, Voce, Ludwigson. In order to minimize the effect of friction, the free expansion experiments were performed with no end feeding. The simulation results were compared with the experimental data to find the appropriate constitutive law for the free expansion process.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 554-557)

Pages:

151-156

Citation:

Online since:

June 2013

Export:

Price:

[1] B. Yang and W.G. Zhang, Analysis and finite element simulation of the tube bulge hydroforming process, Int. J Adv. Manuf. Technol. 29, 2006, Pages 453–458.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-005-2548-6

Google Scholar

[2] K.B. Nielsen, Hydroforming Highlights, sheet hydroforming and tube hydro forming, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 15, 2004, Pages 165-177.

Google Scholar

[3] Ch. Hartl, Research and advances in fundamentals and industrial application of hydroforming, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 167, 2005, Pages 383-392.

Google Scholar

[4] M. Ahmed and M.S.J. Hashmi, Estimation of machine parameters for hydraulic bulge forming of tubular components, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 64, 1997, Pages 9-23.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(96)02549-6

Google Scholar

[5] M. Koc and T. Altan, Prediction of forming limits and parameters in the tube hydroforming process, International J. Mach. Tools and Manuf. 42, 2002, Pages 123–138.

DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(01)00048-7

Google Scholar

[6] F. Vollertsen and P. Plancak, On possibilities for the determination of the coefficient of friction in hydroforming of tubes, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 125-126, 2002, Pages 412–420.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00292-3

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Aue-Woo, G. Ngaile and T. Altan, Optimizing tube hydroforming using process simulation and experimental verification, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 146 , 2004, Pages 137–143.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00854-9

Google Scholar

[8] M. Imaninejad, G. Subhash and A. Loukus, Experimental and numerical investigation of free-bulge formation during hydroforming of aluminum extrusions, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 147, 2004, Pages, 247–254.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.01.004

Google Scholar

[9] Y.M. Hwang, and C.W. Wanga, Flow stress evaluation of zinc copper and carbon steel tubes by hydraulic bulge tests considering their anisotropy, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209, 2009, Pages 4423-4428.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.10.033

Google Scholar

[10] M. Anderson, M.S.c. Dissertation, Mechanical Engineering Dept., École de technologie Supérieure, Montreal, Canada.

Google Scholar

[11] Y.M. Hwang, Y.K. Lin, and T. Altan, 2007, Evaluation of tubular materials by a hydraulic bulge test, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact. Vol.47, pp.343-351.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.03.009

Google Scholar

[12] T.L.I. Belytschko and C.-S. Tsay, Explicit algorithms for the nonlinear dynamics of shells, Computer Methods in Applied Mech. & Eng. 42, 1984, Pages 225-251.

DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(84)90026-4

Google Scholar