Design of Digital Filters for Si Wafer Surface Profile Measurement - Denoising by Total Variation

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the semiconductor industry, high resolution and high accuracy measurement is needed for the geometric evaluation of Si wafers. The flatness parameters are important to evaluate the wafer profile and are required to be the same level as the design rule of IC, and the tolerance for flatness is very tight. According to SEMI (Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International) standards, the required wafer flatness will be 22 nanometres by the year 2016. However, to obtain a higher resolution for sensors, the uncertainty becomes very large compared to the resolution and influences the measured data when the noise is increased. High resolution instruments always incorporate a certain degree of noise. In the presence of noise, form parameters are normally biased. Correction and compensation need a large population of measurements to analytically estimate both bias and uncertainty. The estimation is still far from perfect because of the nature of noise. Another approach is to extract a true profile by filtering noise from the measured data. For the purpose of noise reduction, low-pass filters by Gaussian smoothing and Fourier transform are often used. The noise is normally considered to be a component of small deviation (amplitude) with high frequency which also takes a normal distribution around zero. However these conventional filters can remove the noise in the spatial frequency domain only. So, it is essential to design a filter capable of removing the noise both in the spatial frequency domain and the amplitude component. Thus, we have designed and developed new type of digital filter for denoising. We introduce two new digital filters. One is wavelet transform capable of denoising in the spatial frequency domain and amplitude component, and the other is total variation that can be applied to discontinuous signals without introducing artificial Gibbs Effects.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

332-336

Citation:

Online since:

June 2012

Export:

Price:

[1] H. Haitjema, Uncertainty Propagation in Surface Plate Measurement, Proc. of the 4th Int. Symp. on Dimensional Metrology in Production and Quality Control (1992) 304-320.

Google Scholar

[2] C.J. Evans, Uncertainty evaluation for measurements of peak-to-valley surface form errors, Ann. CRIP 57 (2008) 509-512.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.084

Google Scholar

[3] X. Jiang, P. Scott, D. Whitehouse, Wavelets and their applications for surface metrology, Ann. CRIP 57 (2008) 555-558.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.110

Google Scholar

[4] L. Blunt: The development of basis for 3D surface roughness standards (1998).

Google Scholar

[5] S. Wim, the lifting scheme: A construction of second generation wavelets, SIAM J. on Math. Analysis, 29 (1998) 511-546 Table 2 Comparison of averaged and filtered flatness parameters GBIR(μm) GF3D(μm) GF3R(μm) GFLD(μm) GFLR(μm) Averaged data.

DOI: 10.1137/s0036141095289051

Google Scholar

(1994).

Google Scholar

3395 Filtered by TV.

Google Scholar

(2090).

Google Scholar

(2017).

Google Scholar

3394 Filtered by WT.

Google Scholar

(2014).

Google Scholar

[6] A. Chambolle, An algorithm for total variation minimization and applications, J. of Math. Imaging and Vision 20 (2004) 89-97.

Google Scholar