20#,60Si2Mn,9Cr18MoV Steel Ferrite Area Dynamic Recovery and Recrystallization Research

Article Preview

Abstract:

By using the Gleeble - 1500 hot simulation test machine we studied 20#, 60Si2Mn, 9Cr18MoV the three kinds of low, medium and high carbon steels to observe the dynamic recovery and recrystallization of ferrite while in the process of thermoplastic deformation. We calculated the hot deformation activation energy of each kind of steel by combining the stress-strain curve we got in the experiment and the theoretical model of Z parameter. It turns out Q9Cr18MoV<Q20#<Q60Si2Mn. In the meanwhile, microstructure observation through transmission electron microscope shows that the dynamic recrystallization of ferrite is more likely to happen in 9Cr18MoV steel than in 20# steel and in 60Si2Mn steel. These results indicate that the dynamic recrystallization of ferrite is not only determined by stacking fault energy but also closely related with the strain storage energy release degree.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 690-693)

Pages:

197-201

Citation:

Online since:

May 2013

Export:

Price:

[1] Tingquan Lei, steel thermomechanical treatment [M]. Beijing: mechanical industry press, 1979.10:301-306

Google Scholar

[2] [France] J.P.P OIRIER. Crystal of high temperature plastic deformation (Delin Guan, Junshan Zhang) [M].dalian: dalian university of technology press, 1989,89,125.

Google Scholar

[3] Xianming Zhao, Di Wu, Xuejun Chen. 60Si2Mn steel dynamic recrystallization mathematical model experiment [J]. Journal of iron and steel research. 2003.10 (5) : 32-34.

Google Scholar

[4] Hongtao Huang, Hongshuang Di, Cr12MoV steel Hot deformation behavior [J]. Journal of materials and smelting gold. 2009.12 (4) : 290-293.

Google Scholar

[5] Jianzhong He, Yazheng Liu, Binghua Shi. Q345 containing Nb mild steel CSP rolling dynamic recrystallization [J].journal of special steel. 2005.05 (3) : September 11.

Google Scholar