Removing of Nano-Particles from Semiconductor Wastewater Using a Hybrid Treatment System

Article Preview

Abstract:

Packaging process is one of the main manufacturing steps in the wafer fabrication industries. However, nano-particles would be produced during the packaging process. The produced nano-particle-contained wastewater has characteristics of dark color and high turbidity. Because the nano-particles would usually result in the clogging of the membrane filtration system when it is used for water treatment and reclamation, the application of a pre-treatment system is required to extend the membrane life. The objective of this study was to develop a pre-treatment system for packaging wastewater treatment before membrane system was applied for further water quality improvement. In this laboratory-scale study, a hybrid treatment system containing a chemical coagulation/flocculation followed by ultra-filtration (UF) membrane technology was developed for the wafer fabrication wastewater treatment. The chemical coagulation/flocculation unit was used as the pre-treatment process to improve the efficiency of the following ultra-filtration (UF) membrane system. The packaging wastewater was collected from a wafer fabrication factory and used to evaluate the feasibility of the coagulation/flocculation process on nano-scale particle removal. Results show that approximately 98% of turbidity could be removed at pH 7 when 2.2 mg/L of polyaluminum chloride (PAC) (used as coagulant) and 0.5 mg/L of polyacrylamide (cPAM) (used as flocculant) were added during the coagulation/flocculation process. Results indicate that the coagulation/flocculation is a feasible pre-treatment process for nano-particle removal before UF membrane is applied for further water purification. Results from this study will be helpful in designing a scale-up system for practical applications.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

71-74

Citation:

Online since:

June 2012

Export:

Price:

[1] T.C. Lee and F.J. Liu: J. Hazard. Mater. Vol. 165 (2009), p.359.

Google Scholar

[2] N. O'Brien and E. Cummins: Hum. Ecol. Risk. Assess. Vol. 16 (2010), p.847.

Google Scholar

[3] S. Foss-Hansen, A. Baun, E.S. Michelson, A. Kamper, P. Borling and F. Stuer-Lauridsen: Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, (2009).

Google Scholar

[4] R.D. Handy and B.J. Shaw: Health Risk Soc. Vol. 9 (2007), p.125.

Google Scholar

[5] R.D. Handy, F. von der Kammer, J.R. Lead, M. Hassellöv, R. Owen and M. Crane: Ecotoxicology Vol. 17 (2008), p.287.

DOI: 10.1007/s10646-008-0199-8

Google Scholar

[7] T. Schäfer, F. Huber,  H. Seher,  T. Missana,  U. Alonso,  M. Kumke,  S. Eidner,  F. Claret and  F. Enzmann: Appl. Geochem Vol. 27 (2012), p.390.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2011.09.009

Google Scholar

[8] L. Li, M. Fan, R.C. Brown, J.V. Leeuwen, J. Wang, W. Wang, Y. Song and P. Zhang: Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. Vol. 36 (2006), p.405.

Google Scholar

[9] Ç. Üzüm, T. Shahwan, A.E. Eroğlu, I. Lieberwirth, T.B. Scott and K.R. Hallam: Chem. Eng. J. Vol. 144 (2008), p.213.

Google Scholar

[10] A.G. Mamalis: J. Mater. Process. Technol. Vol. 1 (2007), p.52.

Google Scholar

[11] W. Xu, B. Gao, R. Mao and Q. Yue: J. Hazard. Mater. Vol. 193 (2011), p.249.

Google Scholar

[12] Y.X. Zhao, B.Y. Gao, H.Y. Rong, H.K. Shon, J. -H. Kim, Q.Y. Yue and Y. Wang: Chem. Eng. J. Vol. 173 (2011), p.376.

Google Scholar

[13] K. McCurdy, K. Carlson and D. Gregory: Water Res. Vol. 38 (2004), p.486.

Google Scholar

[14] K. Konieczny, D. Sakol, J. Plonka, M. Rajca and M. Bodzek: Desalination Vol. 240 (2009), p.151.

Google Scholar