Validity Evaluation of Different Laboratory Asphalt Concrete Material Compaction Methods with Digital Image Processing Technique

Article Preview

Abstract:

The digital image processing technique was applied to analyze and evaluate the coarse aggregate orientation property in asphalt mixture specimens. Specimens produced by Marshall compaction, vibratory compaction, gyratory compaction, and roller compaction were separately evaluated and compared with the core samples drilled from real asphalt pavement. The quantitative index named maximum likelihood angle (MLA) was developed for statistical analysis on the coarse aggregate orientation. It is found that the coarse aggregate orientation properties of the specimens using different compaction methods have great differences, the specimens produced by laboratory Marshall compaction method has no statistical discipline, the specimen produced by laboratory roller compaction method has the best similarity property with the real asphalt pavement. The results indicate that the MLA is an effective index in evaluating the aggregate orientation, and the roller compaction method should be the first choice in laboratory asphalt mixes specimen preparation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 255-260)

Pages:

3292-3296

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Export:

Price:

[1] Harvey, J., and C. L. Monismith: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board Vol. 1417 (1993), p.38.

Google Scholar

[2] Button, J. W., D. N. Little, V. Jagadam, and O. J. Pendleton: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board Vol. 1454 (1994), p.193.

Google Scholar

[3] Consuegra, A., D. N. Little, H. Von Quintus, and J. Burati: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board Vol. 1228 (1989), p.80.

Google Scholar

[4] Yue, Z. Q., W. Bekking, and I. Morin: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board Vol. 1492 (1995), p.53.

Google Scholar

[5] Masad E., Muhunthan B., Shashidhar N., Harman T.: Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering Vol. 13 (1999), p.88.

Google Scholar

[6] Masad E., Muhunthan B., Shashidhar N., Harman T.: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board Vol. 1681 (1999), p.179.

DOI: 10.3141/1681-21

Google Scholar

[7] Masad E., Jandhyala V.K., Dasgupta N., Somadevan N., Sashidhar N.: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering Vol. 14, (2002), p.122.

Google Scholar

[8] Masad E., Button J. : Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board Vol. 1891 (2004), p.212.

Google Scholar

[9] Saadeh S., Tashman L., Masad E., Mogawer W.: Journal of Testing and EvaluationVol. 30 (2002), p.483.

Google Scholar

[10] Tashman L., Masad E., Peterson B., Saleh H.: Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists Vol. 70 (2001), p.605.

Google Scholar

[11] Tashman L., Masad E., Angelo J. D., Bukowski J., Harman T.: International Journal of Pavement Engineering Vol. 3 (2002), p.19.

Google Scholar

[12] Wang L.B., Paul H.S., Harman T., Angelo J.D.: Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists Vol. 73 (2004), p.467.

Google Scholar

[13] Wang L.B., Frost J.D., Lai J.S.: Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering Vol. 18 (2004), p.28.

Google Scholar