Effects of Hollowness on Strength of Double Skinned Concrete Filled Steel Tubular Columns of Different Geometries under Axial Loading

Article Preview

Abstract:

Concrete filled tubular columns (CFT) have been used in buildings and bridges since long in history, and research reported in china is since 1970s. It has become popular as structural members due to their excellent structural performance characteristics, which include high strength, stiffness and high ductility. In modern building construction, steel rectangular hollow sections (RHS), square hollow sections (SHS) and circular hollow sections (CHS) are often filled with concrete to form a composite column. Such composite columns are well recognized in view of their high load carrying capacity, fast construction, small cross section, and high fire resistance. Compared to concrete-filled steel tubular (CFT) columns, the DSCFT can reduce its own weight while have a high flexural stiffness. Compared to traditional RC bridge columns and CFT columns it has high bending stiffness, avoids instability under external pressure, is light weight, possesses good damping characteristics due to increase in section modulus. In present study it is found that there is a definite increase in strength. Circular columns had all the properties better than other geometric shapes; strength increase was almost 20 % as compared to square columns. It is expected that if same ratios are maintained at projected scale, there would be a definite increase in strength and behavior of the columns. New concept of hollowness introduced is valid for all geometric shapes in DSCFTs and gives fairly good idea about its limits and effects on strength of columns. The equations given in different design codes give conservative values and hence need to be revised for DSCFTs both for seismic and normal designs.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1746-1751

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Export:

Price:

[1] Giakoumelis G, Lam D. Axial capacity of circular concrete-filled tube columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2004, 60(7): 1049-1068.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2003.10.001

Google Scholar

[2] S.Wei S.T. Mau, C. Vipulanandan and S.K. Mantrala "PERFORMANCE OF NEW SANDWICH TUBE UNDER AXIAL LOADING: ANALYSIS". Journal of Structural Engineering/December 1995.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1995)121:12(1815)

Google Scholar

[3] Wei S.T. Mau, C. Vipulanandan and S.K. Mantrala "PERFORMANCE OF NEW SANDWICH TUBE UNDER AXIAL LOADING: EXPERIMENT". Journal of Structural Engineering/December 1995.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1995)121:12(1806)

Google Scholar

[4] Min-Lang Lin and Keh-Chyuan Tsai "MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF DOUBLE-SKINNED COMPOSITE STEEL TUBULAR COLUMNS" National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan.

Google Scholar

[5] Zhong Tao, Lin-Hai Han, Xiao-Ling Zhao "Behaviour of concrete-filled double skin (CHS inner and CHS outer) steel tubular stub columns and beam-columns". Journal of Constructional Steel Research 60 (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2003.11.008

Google Scholar

[6] Mohamed Elchalakani, Xiao-Ling Zhao and Raphael Grzebieta "Tests on concrete filled double-skin (CHS outer and SHS inner) composite short columns under axial compression". Thin-Walled Structures 40 (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8231(02)00009-5

Google Scholar

[7] Xiao-Ling Zhao, Byoungkee Han and Raphael H. Grzebieta "Plastic mechanism analysis of concrete-filled double-skin (SHS inner and SHS outer) stub Columns". Thin-Walled Structures 40 (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8231(02)00030-7

Google Scholar

[8] Dalian Liu,"tests on high strength rectangular concrete filled steel hollow section stub columns". Journal of Constructional Steel Research 61 (2005) 902-911.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.01.001

Google Scholar

[9] Muhammad Naseem Baig, Fan Jiansheng, Nie Jianguo, "Strength of Concrete Filled Steel Tubular Columns" Tsinghua Science and Technology, Vol.11, No.6, December 2006. pp.657-66.

DOI: 10.1016/s1007-0214(06)70248-6

Google Scholar

[10] ACI Committee 318, Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-95). Detroit: American Concrete Institute; 1995.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1076-0431(1996)2:3(120.3)

Google Scholar

[11] Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures.

Google Scholar

[12] LRFD Manual of Steel Construction third edition 2001.

Google Scholar

[13] Technical Specification for early strength model composite structures used for navy port emergency repair in wartime (GJB 4142-2000).

Google Scholar