Effect of Process Parameters on Mechanical Characterization of Dissimilar Friction Stir Welded Aluminium Alloys

Article Preview

Abstract:

Aluminum alloys exhibit poor weldability by conventional fusion welding process. The heat treatable aluminum alloy AA2014 is extensively used in the aircraft industry because it has good ductility and high strength to weight ratio. In this paper the effects of welding parameters and tool profile on the mechanical properties of friction stir welded butt joints of dissimilar aluminum alloy sheets AA6082 and AA2014. The process parameters such as rotational speed, transverse speed and axial forces were considered. The effect of parameters on weld quality was analyzed. Hardness and tensile tests are carried out at room temperature to examine the mechanical properties of the welded joints. The joints produced with straight square tool pin profile have higher ultimate tensile strength, whereas the straight cylindrical tool pin profile results in lower tensile strength.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

701-704

Citation:

Online since:

June 2015

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Elangovan K, V. Balasubramanian, S. Babu, Predicting tensile strength of friction stir welded AA6061 aluminium alloy joints by a mathematical model, Materials and Design 30 (2009) 188–193.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.037

Google Scholar

[2] Laszlo Gergely Vigh Ichiro Okura, Fatigue behaviour of Friction Stir Welded aluminium bridge deck segment; Materials and Design, 44 (2013) 119–127.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.007

Google Scholar

[3] S. MalarvizhiV. Balasubramanian, Influences of tool shoulder diameter to plate thickness ratio (D/T) on stir zone formation and tensile properties of friction stir welded dissimilar joints of AA8011-5052 aluminum–AZ31B magnesium alloys, Materials and Design 40 (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.04.008

Google Scholar

[4] Jata KV, Sankaran KK, Ruschau JJ, Friction-stir welding effect on microstructure and fatigue of aluminum alloy 7050–T7451, Metallurgy and Mater Transactions 31A (2000) 2181–2192.

DOI: 10.1007/s11661-000-0136-9

Google Scholar

[5] Bo Li, Yifu Shen , Weiye Hu The study on defects in aluminum 2219-T6 thick butt friction stir welds with the application of multiple non-destructive testing methods, Materials and Design 32 (2011) 2073–(2084).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.054

Google Scholar

[6] Sundaram N S, Murugan N, Tensile behaviour of dissimilar friction stir welded joints of aluminium alloys, Materials and Design 31 (2010) 4184-4195.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.04.035

Google Scholar

[7] Leitao C, Leal RM, Rodrigues DM, Loureiro A, Vilaca P, Mechanical behaviour of similar and dissimilar AA5182-H111 and AA6016-T4 thin friction stir welds, Materials and Design, 30 (2009) 101–108.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.045

Google Scholar

[8] Aval HJ, Serajzadeh S, Kokabi AH, Evolution of microstructures and mechanical properties in similar and dissimilar friction stir welding of AA5086 and AA6061,. Materials Science and Engineering A, 528 (2011) 8071–8083.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.07.056

Google Scholar

[9] Olga V, Alerio Flores, Micro structural issues in a friction stir welded aluminium alloy, Scripta Materialia, 38(5) (1998) 703-708.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6462(97)00551-4

Google Scholar

[10] Ouyang JH, Kovacevic. R, Material flow during friction stir welding (FSW) of the same and dissimilar aluminium alloys, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 11(1) (2002) 51-63.

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-002-0008-0

Google Scholar