Study on Dynamic Evolution, Evolution Characteristics and Evolution Reasons of Regional Difference of FDI on China Seaport Construction

Xiao Yong Tian; Wen Feng Sun; Min Tu

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.651-653.1275

Paper Titles

Sedimentary Facies Feature and its Ore-Controlling Role of Middle Permain Liangshan Formation, Southeast District of Guizhou Province
p.1255

Seismic Response Analysis on the Repaired HSC Structure after Fire
p.1260

Study of the Propagation Rules of Stress Wave in Bedding Rock Slope
p.1266

Study on Combined Design of the City of Shenyang Residential Merchandise Condominiums Space
p.1271

Study on Dynamic Evolution, Evolution Characteristics and Evolution Reasons of Regional Difference of FDI on China Seaport Construction
p.1275

Study on Optimal Intercity Railway Transfer Scheme
p.1282

Study on the Influence of Linear of Fire on Steel Deck Arch Bridge
p.1287

Study on the Transport Processes of Pb in Jiaozhou Bay
p.1292

Synthetical Classification and Damage Pattern of Slope/Landslide in Western Hubei Province
p.1295

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 651-653Study on Dynamic Evolution, Evolution...

Study on Dynamic Evolution, Evolution Characteristics and Evolution Reasons of Regional Difference of FDI on China Seaport Construction

Abstract:

By collecting the data of FDI on China seaport construction from 1991 to 2011, and using the nearest point coefficient and Gini coefficient, this paper quantitatively analyzed the spatial and temporal distribution of FDI on China Seaport Construction in three following periods: 1991-1997, 1991-2003 and 1991-2011. Statistics showed that temporal distribution of FDI on China seaport construction was relatively concentrated, and had very strong cyclical quality. Calculation results of the nearest point coefficient and Gini coefficient showed that respectively, the distribution of seaports invested by foreign was aggregated and the distribution of FDI in port groups was unbalanced in each period. But the aggregated and unbalanced degree experienced the same process that first got bigger and then became smaller.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Material Science, Civil Engineering and Architecture Science, Mechanical Engineering and Manufacturing Technology II

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 651-653)

Pages:

1275-1281

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.651-653.1275

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2014

Authors:

Xiao Yong Tian*, Wen Feng Sun, Min Tu

Keywords:

Foreign Direct Investment, Port Cluster, Spatial Distribution, Temporal Distribution

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Sun Junyan, Leng Xiubin. Analysis on trend of Foreign investment on China's coastal ports [J]. China Ports. 2008 (3) 31-32.

Google Scholar

[2] Sen, A. K. On Economic Inequality[M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, (1973).

Google Scholar

[3] Scherer, F.M. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance[M]. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, (1980).

Google Scholar

[4] Krugman, P. R. Geography and Trade[M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, (1991).

Google Scholar

[5] Maurel, F. and B Sédillot. A measure of the geographic concentration in French manufacturing industries[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 1999 (29): 575-604.

DOI: 10.1016/s0166-0462(99)00020-4

Google Scholar

[6] Zhang Chao, Yang Binggeng．The foundation of Measurement Geography[M]. Version 2. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1991: 28-54.

Google Scholar

[7] Zhang Chao, Yang Binggeng．The foundation of Measurement Geography[M]. Version 2. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1991: 28-54.

Google Scholar

[8] Zhang Jianhua. The economics: Introduction and innovation[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2005: 253-254.

Google Scholar

[9] Wang, J.J., A. K-Y. Ng, and D. Olivier. Port governance in China: a review of policies in an era of internationalizing port management practices[J]. Transport Policy, 2004 (11): 237–250.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2003.11.003

Google Scholar