Modeling of Surface Waviness in Abrasive Waterjet Offset-Mode Turning

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, surface waviness produced by turning aluminum parts with abrasive waterjet has been studied regarding changes in some process parameters. Effect of five major parameters such as water pressure, cutting head traverse speed, abrasive mass flow rate, workpiece rotational speed and depth of cut have been investigated using analysis of variances. Second order regression model presented forwaviness.The validity of the model wasconfirmed bycomparing with experimental data. It found thatabrasive mass flow rate, cutting head traverse speed and DOC are the most influencing parameters while water pressure and workpiece rotational speed show lesser effectiveness.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

202-207

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] D. A. Axinte, J. P. Stepanian, M. C. Kong, J. McGourlay, Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manuf. 49 (2009) 351-356.

Google Scholar

[2] E. Uhlmann, K. Flögel, M. Kretzschmar, F. Faltin, The 5th CIRP Conference on High Performance Cutting, Zürich, Switzerland, (2012).

Google Scholar

[3] R. Manu and N. R. Babu, Wear 266 (2009) 1091-1097.

Google Scholar

[4] R. Kovacevic, M. Hashish, R. Mohan, M. Ramulu, T. J. Kim, E. S. Geskin, ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 119 (1997) 776-785.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Mazurkiewicz, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 106(2000) 112-118.

Google Scholar

[6] I. Zohourkari, M. Zohoor, M. Annoni, Adv. Mech. Eng. 2014 (2014) 11.

Google Scholar

[7] W. Li, H. Zhu, J. Wang, Y. M. Ali, C. Huang, Int. J. of Mech. Sci. 77, (2013) 365-376.

Google Scholar

[8] W. Y. Li, H. Zhu, J. Wang, C. Huang, Appl. Mech. Mater. 483, (2014) 177-181.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Hashish, ASME J. Eng. Ind. 109, (1987), 281-290.

Google Scholar

[10] W. Y. Li, J. Wang, Y. M. Ali, Mater. Sci. Forum. 697-698 (2012) 166-170.

Google Scholar

[11] Z. W. Zhong, Z. Z. Han, Mater. Manuf. Proc. 17, (2002) 330-349.

Google Scholar

[12] R. Manu and N. Ramesh Babu, Int. J. Machining and Machinability Mater. 3, (2008) 120-132.

Google Scholar

[13] M. Hashish, 2001 WJTA American Waterjet Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA (2001).

Google Scholar

[14] D. Montgomery, Design and analysis of experiments, 7 ed., Wiley, New York, (2009).

Google Scholar

[15] R. Myers, D. Montgomery, Response surface methodology, Wiley, New York, (2002).

Google Scholar

[16] G. E. P. Box, J. S. Hunter, W. G. Hunter, Statistics for experimenters, Wiley, New York, (2005).

Google Scholar

[17] G. E. P. Box, N. R. Draper, Response surface, mixtures, and ridge analysis, 2 ed. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, (2007).

Google Scholar

[18] D. Liu, C. Huang, J. Wang, H. Zhu, P. Yao, Z. Liu, Ceram. Int. 40, (2014) 7899-7908.

Google Scholar