Energy Efficient Measures for Buildings with Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Systems Located in Bangkok, Thailand

Article Preview

Abstract:

Grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) system efficiency can be maximized with building demand matching. Computer simulations were used to investigate the priorities of energy efficient measures commonly used in residential and commercial buildings in Thailand that decreased the electricity demand while producing load profiles that matched the unique output profiles from PV systems. Residential and commercial buildings in Thailand were modeled in existing conditions. Then they were made compliant with ASHRAE energy standard requirements which can reduce electricity consumption 16-36% in residential buildings and 8-19% in commercial buildings. With energy efficient design measures, electricity production from PV systems could satisfy the remaining consumption and peak electricity demand reduction could reach up to 70% in residential buildings. Electricity consumption and peak demand reduction in commercial buildings was not high. Reducing lighting power density in residential buildings, using higher glazing efficiency in small offices and using thermal mass in big offices were found to be able to reduce more peak load when electricity output from PV systems were incorporated in the buildings compared with other measures. Energy efficient design measures suitable for different purposes in each building type have been identified. Building owners and electricity utilities can use this information to select the best energy efficient design measures that fit their objectives.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

224-230

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] USGBC Research Committee, A National Green Building Research Agenda (2007).

Google Scholar

[2] D.A. Torrey, J.M. Kokernak, Increasing The Productivity of Solar Photovoltaic Systems, in: ASME International Solar Energy Conference, Denver, Colorado (2006).

DOI: 10.1115/isec2006-99096

Google Scholar

[3] W.M. Rohouma, I.M. Molokhia, A.H. Esuri, Comparative Study of Different PV Modules Configuration Reliability, in Desalination 209(1-3) (2007), pp.122-128.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.04.020

Google Scholar

[4] C.L. Cheng, C.S. Sanchez Jimenez, M. -C. Lee, Research of BIPV Optimal Tilted Angle, Use of Latitude Concept for South Orientated Plans, in Renewable Energy 34(6) (2009), pp.1644-1650.

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2008.10.025

Google Scholar

[5] C. d.S. Jardim, R. Ruther, I.T. Salamoni, T. d.S. Viana, S.H. Rebechi P.J. Knob, The Strategic Siting and the Roofing Area Requirements of Building-Integrated Photovoltaic Solar Energy Generators in Urban Areas in Brazil, in Energy and Buildings 40(3) (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.02.035

Google Scholar

[6] H. Yang,L. Lu, The Optimum Tilt Angles and Orientations of PV Claddings for Building-Integrated Photovoltaic (BIPV) Applications, in Journal of Solar Energy Engineering 129(2) (2007), pp.253-255.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2212439

Google Scholar

[7] J.D. Mondol, Y.G. Yohanis,B. Norton, The Impact of Array Inclination and Orientation on The Performance of a Grid-Connected Photovoltaic System, in Renewable Energy 32(1) (2007), pp.118-140.

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2006.05.006

Google Scholar