Protection and Reconstruction Strategy Research of Mixed-Used Historical Settlements Shengzhou Dongqian Street as an Example

Xiao Qing Zhu; Jia Yan Fu; Jiao Jiao Sun

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.357-360.1730

Paper Titles

Progress of the Study of Rural Clustering and Village Allocation Planning Method
p.1710

Research on Land Planning and the Integration of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei Langfang
p.1715

Research on Ecological Nodes of Campus Based on Eco-Network Planning for University
p.1719

Research on Mixed Vitality of Historic District and Space Mode Optimization: A Comparison between Hefang Street and Xinyifang in Hangzhou
p.1724

Protection and Reconstruction Strategy Research of Mixed-Used Historical Settlements Shengzhou Dongqian Street as an Example
p.1730

The Enlightenment of the Planning Modes of Foreign Resort Island for Island Resort's Planning in Zhejiang Province
p.1735

The Study of Arrangement Model and Potential Maximization of Rural Land
p.1740

An Empirical Study on Influencing Factors of Residential Location Choice in Hangzhou, China
p.1747

The Preliminary Study of Protection, Development and Development Mode in the Northwards Progress of Xi'an City
p.1752

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 357-360Protection and Reconstruction Strategy Research of...

Protection and Reconstruction Strategy Research of Mixed-Used Historical Settlements Shengzhou Dongqian Street as an Example

Abstract:

Based on the protection and reconstruction of the ancient community and regarding the "culture inheritance" and "mixed-use" as a core, this paper will study the modification principle in terms of the reconstruction of wall area, the design of public recreational center, the reconstruction of reserved dwellings and the design of newly-built dwellings. Space utilization, improvement of public service facilities, combination of basic house type unit and the harmony of ancient and newly-built construction are the key part of the principle. Through the description of current cultural conservation status, this paper analyze the generation motivation of China's ancient community functional mixed paradigm and culture clues, summarize the evolution of spatial pattern of Shengzhou with its geographic-specific properties and propose an updated protection strategies in order to achieve fundamental purpose "old community, new life".

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Architecture, Building Materials and Engineering Management

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 357-360)

Pages:

1730-1734

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.357-360.1730

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

August 2013

Authors:

Xiao Qing Zhu, Jia Yan Fu, Jiao Jiao Sun

Keywords:

Ancient Community, Culture Clues, Mixed, Protection, Reconstruction, Shengzhou

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

References

[1] Ammar Bouchair, Albert Dupagne: Stuck between the historic and modern China: A case study of children's space in a hutong community. Journal of Environmental Psychology Vol. 32(2012), p.59.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.10.001

Google Scholar

[2] Fang Wang, Jing Liu, Bing Pan, Luyin Zhao, Min Zhang: Building traditions of Mzab facing the challenges of re-shaping of its built form and society. Building and Environment Vol. 38(2003), p.1345.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-1323(03)00065-9

Google Scholar

[3] Ayyoob Sharifi, Akito Murayama: Changes in the traditional urban form and the social sustainability of contemporary cities: A case study of Iranian cities. Habitat International Vol. 38(2013), p.126.

DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.05.007

Google Scholar

[4] Siavash Jalaladdini, Derya Oktay: Urban Public Spaces and Vitality: A Socio-Spatial Analysis in the Streets of Cypriot Towns. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences Vol. 35(2012), p.664.

DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.135

Google Scholar

[5] Wolfgang Sonne: Dwelling in the metropolis: Reformed urban blocks 1890–1940 as a model for the sustainable compact city. Progress in Planning Vol. 72(2009), p.53.

DOI: 10.1016/j.progress.2009.06.001

Google Scholar