Distribution & Access For Publication Downloads News About Us Contact Us
Paper Titles
An Extractive Question Answering System for the Tamil Language
p.312
Deep Learning-Based Speech Emotion Recognition
p.320
Social Media User Oppression Detection Technique Using Supervised and Unsupervised Machine Learning Algorithms
p.330
Medical Diagnosis through Chatbots
p.335
Sentiment Analysis of National Eligibility-Cum Entrance Test on Twitter Data Using Machine Learning Techniques
p.344
Two-Step Text Recognition and Summarization of Scanned Documents
p.355
Detecting Fake Job Posting Using ML Classifications and Ensemble Model
p.362
Artificial Intelligence Based Chatbot for Healthcare Applications
p.370
An Applied Computational Linguistics Approach to Clustering Scientific Research Papers
p.378

Sentiment Analysis of National Eligibility-Cum Entrance Test on Twitter Data Using Machine Learning Techniques

Article Preview

Abstract:

People around the world use social media to communicate and share their perceptions about a variety of topics. Social media analysis is crucial to interacting, distributing, and stating people's opinions on various topics. Governments and organizations can take action on alarming issues more quickly with the help of such textual data investigation. The key purpose of this effort is to perform sentiment analysis of textual data regarding National Eligibility-cum Entrance Test (NEET), perform classification and determine how people feel about NEET. In this study, 11 different machine learning classifiers were used to analyze tweet sentiment, along with natural language processing (NLP). Tweepy is the python library which is used to get user opinion about NEET Exam. Annotating the data is accomplished using TextBlob and Vader. Text data is pre-processed with a natural language toolkit. The dataset downloaded from Twitter shows that unigram models perform well compared to bigram and trigram models. TF-IDF models are more accurate than count vectorizer which is based on word frequency. classifier achieves an average accuracy of 92%. Perceptron also receives the uppermost average accuracy of 91%. According to the data from the experiment, most people have a neutral opinion of NEET.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Proceedings: IoT, Cloud and Data Science View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advances in Science and Technology (Volume 124)

Pages:

344-354

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/p-8fy5ca

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

February 2023

Authors:

E. Chandralekha*, V.M. Jemin, P. Rama, K. Prabakaran

Keywords:

Machine Learning, NEET Exam, Sentiment Analysis, Social Media, Tweepy, Twitter

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] David Zimbra, Ahmed Abbasi, Daniel Zeng, and Hsinchun Chen, The State-of-the-Art in Twitter Sentiment Analysis: A Review and Benchmark Evaluation, ACM Trans. Manage. Inf. Syst, Vol 9, pp.1-29. (2018).

DOI: 10.1145/3185045

Google Scholar

[2] Aarzoo Dhiman, Durga Toshniwal, A Twiter Framework to assess the Efectiveness of Indian Government Campaign, ACM Trans, pp.2375-4699. (2021).

DOI: 10.1145/3490503

Google Scholar

[3] Nadia Felix F. da Silva, Luiz F. S. Coletta, and Eduardo R. Hruschka., A survey and comparative study of tweet sentiment analysis via semi-supervised learning, ACM Comput. Surv, Vol. 49, pp.1-26. (2016).

DOI: 10.1145/2932708

Google Scholar

[4] Ashima Yadav and Dinesh Kumar Vishwakarma, A Language- independent Network to Analyze the Impact of COVID-19 on the World via Sentiment Analysis, ACM Trans. Internet Technol, Vol.22, pp.1-30. (2021).

DOI: 10.1145/3475867

Google Scholar

[5] Devendra K. Tayal, Sumit K. Yadav, Sentiment analysis on social campaign Swachh Bharat Abhiyan using unigram method, Vol. 32,pp.633-645. (2017).

DOI: 10.1007/s00146-016-0672-5

Google Scholar

[6] Batrinca, B., Treleaven, P.C, Social media analytics: a survey of techniques, tools and platforms, AI & Soc, Vol. 30, p.89–116. (2015).

DOI: 10.1007/s00146-014-0549-4

Google Scholar

[7] Rocío B. Hubert, Elsa Estevez, Ana Maguitman, and Tomasz Janowski, Analyzing and Visualizing Government-Citizen Interactions on Twitter to Support Public Policy-making, Digit. Gov.: Res. Pract. Vol. 1, pp.1-20. (2020).

DOI: 10.1145/3360001

Google Scholar

[8] Anastasia Giachanou and Fabio Crestani, Like it or not: A survey of Twitter sentiment analysis methods, ACM Comput. Surv. Vol. 49, pp.1-41. (2016).

DOI: 10.1145/2938640

Google Scholar

[9] Paltoglou, G. and Thelwall, M, Twitter, MySpace, Digg: Unsupervised sentiment analysis in social media, ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol, Vol.3, pp.1-19. (2012).

DOI: 10.1145/2337542.2337551

Google Scholar

[10] Jose N. Franco-Riquelme, Antonio Bello-Garcia, Joaquín Ordieres- Meré , Political Support for the Electoral Process on Twitter: The Case of Spain's 2015 and 2016 General Elections, IEEE Access,Vol.7, p.62545 – 62560. (2019).

DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2917398

Google Scholar

[11] Itisha Gupta, Nisheeth Joshi, Feature-Based Twitter Sentiment Analysis With Improved Negation Handling, IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, vol. 8, pp.917-927. (2021).

DOI: 10.1109/tcss.2021.3069413

Google Scholar

[12] Bibi Amina, Tayyaba Azim, SCANCPECLENS: A Framework for Automatic Lexicon Generation and Sentiment Analysis of Micro Blogging Data on China Pakistan Economic Corridor, IEEE Access, Vol. 7, p.133876 – 133887.( 2019).

DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2940528

Google Scholar

[13] Analysis of Public Sentiment on COVID-19 Vaccination Using Twitter, IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems , p.1 – 11. (2021).

Google Scholar

[14] Z. Jianqiang and G. Xiaolin, Comparison research on text preprocessing methods on Twitter sentiment analysis, IEEE Access, vol. 5, p.2870–2879. (2017).

DOI: 10.1109/access.2017.2672677

Google Scholar

[15] S. E. Saad and J. Yang, Twitter sentiment analysis based on ordinal regression, IEEE Access, vol. 7, p.163677–163685. (2019).

DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2952127

Google Scholar

[16] S. Bhat, S. Garg, and G. Poornalatha, Assigning sentiment score for Twitter tweets, in Proc. Int. Conf. Adv. Comput., Commun. Informat. (ICACCI), p.934–937. (2018).

DOI: 10.1109/icacci.2018.8554762

Google Scholar

[17] L. Nemes and A. Kiss, Social media sentiment analysis based on COVID-19, J. Inf. Telecommun., vol. 5, no. 1, p.1–15.( 2021).

Google Scholar

[18] U. Naseem, I. Razzak, M. Khushi, P. W. Eklund, and J. Kim, COVIDSenti: A large-scale benchmark Twitter data set for COVID- 19 sentiment analysis, IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst., vol. no. , pp. – ( 2021).

DOI: 10.1109/tcss.2021.3051189

Google Scholar

[19] H. Lyu et al., Social media study of public opinions on potential COVID-19 vaccines: Informing dissent, disparities, and dissemination, 2020, arXiv:2012.02165. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv. org/abs/2012.02165.

DOI: 10.1101/2020.12.12.20248070

Google Scholar

[20] Z. Ren, G. Zeng, L. Chen, Q. Zhang, C. Zhang, and D. Pan, A lexicon-enhanced attention network for aspect-level sentiment analysis, IEEE Access, vol. 8, p.93464–93471. ( 2020).

DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2995211

Google Scholar

[21] L.-A. Cotfas, C. Delcea, I. Roxin, C. Ioanas, D. S. Gherai, and F. Tajariol, The longest month: Analyzing COVID-19 vaccination opinions dynamics from tweets in the month following the first vaccine announcement, IEEE Access, vol. 9, p.33203–33223. (2021).

DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3059821

Google Scholar

[22] K. Zvarevashe and O. O. Olugbara, A framework for sentiment analysis with opinion mining of hotel reviews, in Proc. Conf. Inf. Commun. Technol. Soc. (ICTAS), p.1–4. (2018).

DOI: 10.1109/ictas.2018.8368746

Google Scholar

Scientific.Net is a registered brand of Trans Tech Publications Ltd
© 2024 by Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved