1887

Abstract

Summary

Levee assessment recognized methodologies imply setting up investigation campaigns, including geophysical and geotechnical investigation methods. A major issue is to combine the geotechnical and geophysical data, taking into consideration their respective levels of uncertainties, inaccuracies and incompleteness as well as spatial distributions. In this work we propose the results of a fusion methodology based on the use of Belief Functions and two combination rules, to merge geotechnical (cone penetrometer and grain size distribution) and geophysical (electrical resistivity) data, acquired on a real fluvial levee. We display an enhancement of the results obtained in previous work, considering a new way of assigning geophysical belief masses, a different classification index for the penetrometer test data (Ic) and an additional combination rule (Proportional Conflict Rule n°6). We highlight the ability of this fusion methodology to discriminate the constitutive sets of geological materials inside an earthen levee with an associated confidence level. We also demonstrate the relevance of the improvements in the methodology comparatively with the past results.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202020016
2020-12-07
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Dezert, T., Fargier, Y., Palma-Lopes, S. and Côte, P.
    [2019a] Levee Characterization by Means of Data Fusion of In-Situ Geophysical and Geotechnical Information. In 25th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dezert, T.
    [2019b] Combinaison d’informations ponctuelles et volumiques pour le diagnostic d’ouvrages en terre soumis à des risques hydrauliques (Doctoral dissertation, Université de Nantes).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fauchard, C. and Mériaux, P.
    [2007] Geophysical and geotechnical methods for diagnosing flood protection dikes: Guide for implementation and interpretation. Quae.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Martin, A. and Osswald, C.
    [2006] A new generalization of the proportional conflict redistribution rule stable in terms of decision. Advances and Applications of DSmT for Information Fusion: Collected Works, 2(2), 69–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. NF P 11-300
    . [1992] Classification des matériaux utilisables dans la construction des remblais et des couches de forme d’infrastructures routières, Exécution des terrassements.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Robertson, P. K. and Wride, C. E.
    [1998] Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test. Canadian geotechnical journal, 35(3), 442–459.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Robertson, P. K.
    [2015] Soil behavior type using the DMT. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Flat Dilatometer Conference, Roma, Italy. 14–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. RoyetP., Palma Lopes, S., Fauchard, C., Mériaux, P. and Auriau, L.
    [2013] Rapid and cost-effective dike condition assessment methods: geophysics. Geography, 32(4), 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Shafer, G.
    [1976] A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Sharp, M., Wallis, M., Deniaud, F., Hersch-Burdick, R., Tourment, R., Matheu, E. and Smith, P.
    [2013] The international levee handbook. CIRIA, London, 497–498.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Smets, P.
    [1990] The combination of evidence in the transferable belief model. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 12(5), 447–458.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202020016
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202020016
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error