不同林龄杨树人工林土壤动物群落结构特征

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.03.002

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2014, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (03): 8-12.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.03.002

不同林龄杨树人工林土壤动物群落结构特征

谭艳¹,王邵军^2*,阮宏华^1*,范换¹,许凯¹,徐钰¹,徐长柏³,曹国华³

1.南京林业大学,江苏省林业生态工程重点实验室,江苏南京 210037;
2.西南林业大学环境科学与工程学院, 云南昆明 650224;
3.江苏省东台市林场,江苏东台 224200

出版日期:2014-05-15 发布日期:2014-05-15
基金资助:
收稿日期:2014-01-05 修回日期:2014-04-05
基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展计划(2012CB416904); 国家自然科学基金项目(31270489); 江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目(CXLX12-0521)
第一作者:谭艳,硕士生。*通信作者:王邵军,副教授。E-mail:shaojunwang2009@163.com。阮宏华,教授。E-mail:hhruan@njfu.edu.cn。
引文格式:谭艳,王邵军,阮宏华,等. 不同林龄杨树人工林土壤动物群落结构特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2014,38(3):8-12.

Community structure of soil fauna in different age poplar plantations

TAN Yan¹, WANG Shaojun^2*, RUAN Honghua^1*, FAN Huan¹, XU Kai¹, XU Yu¹, XU Changbai³, CAO Guohua³

1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Forestry Ecological Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China;
2. College of Environment Science and Engineering, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China;
3. Dongtai City Forest Farm of Jiangsu Province, Dongtai 224200, China

Online:2014-05-15 Published:2014-05-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对苏北沿海地区4、9和20年生杨树人工林的土壤动物群落结构进行了调查和分析,结果表明:(1)共捕获土壤动物113 994只,隶属3门9纲23目。共有优势类群为甲螨亚目和前气门亚目,共有常见类群为等翅目。(2)各林龄杨树林土壤动物个体密度差异显著(p<0.05),但土壤动物类群数无显著差异(p>0.05); 各林龄中土壤动物总密度从大到小依次为:4年生林、9年生林、20年生林,土壤动物的优势类群和常见类群有显著不同。(3)各林龄杨树林土壤层的土壤动物个体密度和类群数显著高于凋落物层的(p<0.05)。(4)不同林龄林地以及不同季节的土壤动物多样性指数间差异均不显著(p>0.05)。各林龄杨树林土壤动物群落相似度随季节变化而不同,其中9年生与20年生杨树林的相似度较高。研究表明,不同林龄杨树人工林土壤动物的群落结构特征不同,即不同林龄杨树林改变了土壤动物的多度以及类群结构,但对动物类群数量没有明显影响。

Abstract: The author conducted a study on the composition and its dynamics of soil faunas under different age poplar plantations in the coastal area of north Jiangsu. The results showed that:(1)There were 113 994 soil faunas in the investigation, which belonged to 3 Phyla, 9 Classes and 23 Orders. The dominanted groups were Oribatida and Prostigmata, the common ordinary group was Isoptera.(2)The taxonomic group number of soil fauna was not significant(p>0.05)among different age poplar plantations, while a significant difference of soil fauna individual density(p<0.05)was observed in the three sites. The order of soil fauna density was: 4 years old poplar plantation, 9 years old poplar plantation, 20 years old poplar plantation. The dominant groups and ordinary groups of soil fauna community were differnent across the different age poplar plantations.(3)The individual density and taxonomic number of soil fauna in 0-20 cm soil layer were significantly higher(p<0.05)than in litter of different age poplar plantations.(4)The diversity index of soil fauna was not significant(p>0.05)among different age poplar plantations and different seasons. Jaccard index of soil fauna communities varied according to the changed seasons among different age poplar plantations, the similarity between 9 years old poplar plantation and 20 years old plantation were high. The results indicated that there were different characteristics of soil fauna community in different age poplar plantations, the different age poplar plantations changed the soil fauna abundance and group structure, but has no significant effect on soil fauna group numbers.

中图分类号:

S718.6

谭艳,王邵军,阮宏华,等. 不同林龄杨树人工林土壤动物群落结构特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2014, 57(03): 8-12.

TAN Yan, WANG Shaojun, RUAN Honghua, FAN Huan, XU Kai, XU Yu, XU Changbai, CAO Guohua. Community structure of soil fauna in different age poplar plantations[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2014, 57(03): 8-12.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.03.002.

参考文献

[1] Noble J C, Whitford W G, Kaliszweski M. Soil land litter microarthropod populations from two contrasting ecosystems in semi-arid eastern Australia[J]. Journal of Arid Environments,1996,32(3):329-346.
[2] Huhta V.The role of soil fauna in ecosystems: A historical review[J].Pedobiologia,2007,50:489-495.
[3] Birkhofer K,Bezemer T M,Bloem J,et al.Long-term organic farming fosters below and aboveground biota: implications for soil quality, biological control and productivity[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2008,40(9):2297-2308.
[4] Darby B J,Neher D A,Housman D C,et al.Few apparent short-term effects of elevated soil temperature and increased frequency of summer precipitation on the abundance and taxonomic diversity of desert soil micro-and meso-fauna[J].Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2011,43(7):1474-1481.
[5] Bird S,Coulson R N,Crossley D A.Impacts of silvicultural practices on soil and litter arthropod diversity in a Texas pine plantation[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2000,131(1):65-80.
[6] Maharning A R, Mills A A S, Adl S M.Soil community changes during secondary succession to naturalized grasslands[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2009,41(2):137-147.
[7] 易兰,由文辉,宋永昌.天童常绿阔叶林五个演替阶段凋落物中的土壤动物群落[J].生态学报,2005,25(3):466-473. Yi L,You W H,Song Y C. Soil animal communities in the litter of the evergreen broad-leaved forest at five succession stages in Tiantong[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2005,25(3):466-473.
[8] 黄旭,文维全,张健,等.川西高山典型自然植被土壤动物多样性[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(1):181-190. Huang X,Wen W Q,Zhang J,et al.Soil faunal diversity under typical alpine vegetations in west Sichuan[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2010,21(1):181-190.
[9] Scheu S,Albers D,Alphei J,et al.The soil fauna community in pure and mixed stands of beech and spruce of different age: Trophic structure and structuring forces[J].Oikos,2003,101(2):225-238.
[10] 尹文英,杨逢春,王振中.中国亚热带土壤动物[M].北京:科学出版社,1992.
[11] 尹文英,胡圣豪,沈韫芬,等.中国土壤动物检索图鉴[M].北京:科学出版社,1998.
[12] 李鸿兴,隋敬之,周士秀,等.昆虫分类检索[M].北京:农业出版社,1987.
[13] 谭波,吴福忠,杨万勤,等.川西亚高山/高山森林大型土壤动物群落多样性及其对季节性冻融的响应[J].生物多样性,2012,20(2):215-223. Tan B,Wu F Z,Yang W Q,et al.Soil macro-fauna community diversity and its response to seasonal freeze-thaw in the subalpine / alpine forests of western Sichuan[J].Biodiversity Science,2012,20(2):215-223.
[14] Pielou E C.Ecology Diversity [M].New York:John Wieley & Sons,1975.
[15] 马克平,刘玉明.生物群落多样性的测度方法[J].生物多样性,1994,2(4):231-239.
[16] 徐国良,周国逸,莫江明,等.鹤山丘陵退化生态系统植被恢复的土壤动物群落结构[J].生态学报,2005,25(7):1670-1677 Xu G L,Zhou G Y,Mo J M,et al.The responses of soil fauna composition to forest restoration in Heshan[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2005,25(7):1670-1677.
[17] 袁志忠,崔洋,颜绍馗.叶凋落物数量和类型对森林土壤动物及其生物学质量的影响[J].生物多样性,2013,21(2):206-213. Yuan Z Z,Cui Y,Yan S K.Effect of leaf litter quantity and type on forest soil fauna and biological quality[J].Biodiversity Science,2013,21(2):206-213.
[18] 肖玖金,张健,黄玉梅,等.采伐干扰前后巨桉人工林土壤动物群落比较[J].应用与环境生物学报,2011,17(1):73-77. Xiao J J,Zhang J,Huang Y M,et al.Variation of soil fauna community in Eucalyptus grandis plantation before and after felling disturbance[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2011,17(1):73-77.

相关文章 15

[1]	刘兴婕, 吴琪祺, 李媛媛, 阮宏华, 丁学农, 曹国华, 沈彩芹. 林龄和季节交互对杨树人工林土壤节肢动物群落结构的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 224-230.
[2]	李俊冬, 查禄慧, 马国强, 肖剑平, 李育武, 李旭. 云南楚雄小百草岭鸟类多样性空间格局[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 225-233.
[3]	林远锋, 鲁长虎, 许鹏, 崔鹏, 张文文. 1976年以来丹顶鹤在我国的分布变迁及就地保护状况[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(6): 200-208.
[4]	吴文清, 许克福. 合肥环城公园开放空间与游憩行为关系研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(6): 217-224.
[5]	刘大伟, 侯森林, 周用武, 费宜玲, 何建. 涉案偶蹄目动物DNA条形码构建[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(6): 27-32.
[6]	李媛媛,许子乾,徐涵湄,陈月琴,阮宏华. 施肥对陆地生态系统土壤动物影响的研究述评[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 61(05): 179-184.
[7]	蒋婵,李青青,刘莉莉,周杰珑,陈粉粉,杨亚晋,张璇,郭爱伟. 大熊猫10种潜在食竹营养成分的季节变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 61(05): 148-154.
[8]	侯金,杨建,李玉杰,黄金燕,刘巅,张晋东. 基于红外相机调查的卧龙自然保护区兽类资源时空分布特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 61(03): 187-192.
[9]	杨宝玲,张文文,范换,王邵军,阮宏华,沈彩芹,曹国华. 苏北沿海地区不同土地利用类型下土壤动物群落结构特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 60(06): 120-126.
[10]	周用武,刘昌景. 鸮形目7种鸟类腹部羽毛的扫描电镜观察[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 59(06): 193-198.
[11]	曾丽琼,黄金水,蔡守平,柯玉铸,何学友,林秀琴,李秀明,吴惠忠. 48个木麻黄无性系对星天牛的抗性鉴定[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2014, 57(05): 51-56.
[12]	范换,王邵军,阮宏华,谭艳,郑阿宝,徐钰,许凯,曹国华. 苏北沿海不同土地类型土壤动物群落及其对凋落物分解的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2014, 57(03): 1-7.
[13]	陈静,王玉军,武丙琳,鲁庆彬. 清凉峰旅游区鸟类多样性及季节变动[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 55(03): 37-42.
[14]	庄艳美,孔繁花,尹海伟,张琳琳,孙振如. 城市绿地空间格局对鸟类群落影响的研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 55(03): 131-136.
[15]	郭建;胡锦矗. 冶勒自然保护区大熊猫的食物基地[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2000, 43(05): 41-44.

不同林龄杨树人工林土壤动物群落结构特征

Community structure of soil fauna in different age poplar plantations

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿