Implementation of Educational Scholarship Programs at Amil Zakat Institutions in West Kalimantan: An Evaluation Study of the CIPP Model
Abstract
Program evaluation is needed to improve the quality of education funding through scholarships for underprivileged students so they can continue quality education. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of educational funding through a scholarship program organized by the Amil Zakat Institute of the Great Mosque of Mujahiddin, West Kalimantan, by using the CIPP model, which consists of context, input, process, and product elements. Program evaluation is carried out through stages, interviews, observation, and documentation. The results obtained are a score of 92.86 and have the "very good" category. However, several improvements need to be made by educational units to improve quality in implementing inclusive education in mathematics learning. The improvements are the addition of special tutors (GPK) who can specifically handle students with a variety of special needs and the procurement of data provision regarding the continuity of inclusive education programs for learning mathematics at the next level and level. Thus, the CIPP evaluation model can be used to evaluate inclusive education programs in mathematics learning in junior high schools, which provide outputs in the form of final scores, categories, and recommendations for improvement.
Downloads
References
Arikunto, S., & Jabar, C. S. (2014). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Teoritis dan Praktis bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Pustaka Aksara.
Bhakti, Y. B. (2017). Evaluasi program model CIPP pada proses pembelajaran IPA. JIPFRI (Jurnal Inov. Pendidik. Fis. Dan Ris. Ilmiah, 1(2), 75-82.
Dunn, W. N. (1981). Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction (Second Edition). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Fattah, N. (2012). Analisis Kebijakan Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Fitzpatrick, J. (2011). Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines (4th edition). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Imania, K. A., & Bariah, S. K. (2019). Rancangan Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Pembelajaran Berbasis Daring. Journal PETIK. doi:10.31980/jpetik.v5i1.445.
Joint Committee on Standards for the committee on Standards. (1994). The Program Evaluation Standards. Thousand Oaks: CA: Press.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1985). Systematic Evaluation. Masachusetts: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2007). Evaluation, Theory, Models, & Application. San Fransisco: CA: Whilley.
Stufflebeam, D., & Coryn, C. L. (2014). Evaluation: Theory, Models, & Application (Second Edition). San Fransisco: Jossey-
Copyright (c) 2022 Suhra Wardi, Sumin Sumin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit manuscript retain its copyright and grant publisher right of first publication licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to access (search, read, download, and cite), share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon any material) the work for any lawful purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Qalamuna: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Agama.
