ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10): 1785-1799.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.01785

• 研究构想 • 上一篇    下一篇

正念何以减少非伦理行为?双系统理论的视角

明晓东1, 付静宇2, 白新文3,4, 杨建锋1()   

  1. 1江西财经大学工商管理学院, 南昌 330013
    2对外经济贸易大学国际商学院, 北京 100029
    3中国科学院行为科学重点实验室, 中国科学院心理研究所, 北京 100101
    4中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-21 出版日期:2023-10-15 发布日期:2023-07-25
  • 通讯作者: 杨建锋, E-mail: jianfengyang8066@gmail.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(72101103);国家自然科学基金项目(72062017);国家自然科学基金项目(71871214);江西省高校人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(JD21047)

How does mindfulness reduce unethical behavior? Insights from the dual-system theory

MING Xiaodong1, FU Jingyu2, BAI Xinwen3,4, YANG Jianfeng1()   

  1. 1School of Business Administration, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China
    2Business School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China
    3CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    4Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2022-12-21 Online:2023-10-15 Published:2023-07-25

摘要:

工作场所非伦理行为对组织具有极大的危害, 探索非伦理行为的干预办法具有重要意义。以往研究主要从理性道德决策视角考察非伦理行为的干预办法, 从直觉道德决策视角考察非伦理行为干预办法的研究相对缺乏。本项目提出正念可以同时影响理性道德决策系统和直觉道德决策系统, 进而减少非伦理行为。理论上, 希望从道德决策双系统的角度考察正念对非伦理行为的影响, 拓展正念与非伦理行为交叉融合的研究思路。实践应用上, 提出正念作为一种同时影响理性和直觉道德决策系统的重要因素, 可以为管理实践中减少非伦理行为提供启示。

关键词: 非伦理行为, 正念, 双系统理论, 干预, 道德决策

Abstract:

Unethical behavior in the workplace poses significant harm to organizations, thus necessitating the exploration of intervention strategies in the context of management practices. While previous research has focused predominantly on intervention methods for unethical workplace behavior from a rational ethical decision-making standpoint, exploration of such methods from an intuitive ethical decision-making perspective has been limited. This project asserts that mindfulness has the potential to impact both the rational ethical decision-making system and the intuitive ethical decision-making system, consequently mitigating workplace unethical behavior.

In relation to the rational ethical decision-making system, this study proposes to identify moral imagination and moral disengagement as two crucial mechanisms linking mindfulness to unethical behavior. Moral imagination has long been recognized as a significant factor in reducing unethical behavior. Mindfulness has the potential to enhance awareness, perspective-taking, and creativity, which are key dimensions of moral imagination. As a result, mindfulness can facilitate the cultivation of moral imagination, thereby contributing to a reduction in unethical behavior. Furthermore, moral disengagement represents a risk factor that can contribute to unethical behavior. Mindfulness, by fostering heightened self-monitoring among individuals, has the capacity to diminish moral disengagement. Therefore, moral disengagement acts as a mediator in the negative relationship between mindfulness and unethical behavior.

Regarding the intuitive ethical decision-making system, this study proposes to identify emotional exhaustion and moral emotion as two significant mechanisms that link mindfulness to unethical behavior. Individuals experiencing emotional exhaustion are more susceptible to impulsive engagement in unethical behavior due to depleted self-control resources. Mindfulness has been shown to be advantageous in replenishing these self-control resources, thereby reducing emotional exhaustion. Consequently, emotional exhaustion acts as a mediator in the negative relationship between mindfulness and unethical behavior. Furthermore, moral emotions play a crucial role in encouraging individuals to avoid unethical behavior instinctively. Mindfulness, with its emphasis on cultivating a compassionate attitude, has the potential to foster virtuous qualities and enhance moral emotions. Consequently, moral emotion serves as a mediator in the negative relationship between mindfulness and unethical behavior.

By integrating the rational and the intuitive ethical decision-making systems, a dual-system model of the relationship between mindfulness and unethical behavior is developed. Nevertheless, this project also proposes certain boundary conditions that influence this dual-system model. In terms of contextual factors, ethical climate is posited as a significant boundary condition. Ethical climate can help individuals with high levels of mindfulness recognize moral dilemmas, thereby enhancing the impacts of mindfulness on moral disengagement and moral emotion. Regarding individual factors, this project identifies moral identity and moral attentiveness as two important boundary conditions. Moral identity can strengthen the relationship between mindfulness and moral imagination, as individuals with a strong moral identity are more likely to engage in imaginative moral reasoning. On the other hand, moral attentiveness may negatively moderate the relationship between mindfulness and emotional exhaustion. This possibility suggests that among individuals with high levels of moral attentiveness, the relationship between mindfulness and emotional exhaustion may be weaker.

This project endeavors to examine the influence of mindfulness on unethical behavior from the perspective of the dual-system theory of ethical decision-making, thereby contributing to the interdisciplinary exploration of mindfulness and behavioral ethics. By proposing a comprehensive theory of the relationship between mindfulness and unethical behavior, this study offers valuable insights for future research in related domains. Additionally, this project identifies several potential boundary conditions that may impact the relationships between mindfulness and its outcomes. While the effectiveness of mindfulness may vary across individuals, research exploring the boundary conditions that moderate the effects of mindfulness remains scarce. Thus, by investigating these possible boundary conditions, this project seeks to enhance our understanding of mindfulness in a comprehensive manner.

In terms of practical implications, this project identifies mindfulness as a significant factor that influences both the rational and the intuitive ethical decision-making systems, thereby offering valuable insights for intervening in unethical behavior in the context of management practices. Previous intervention methods targeting unethical behavior in organizations have focused predominantly on the rational ethical decision-making system. However, it is crucial to recognize that many instances of unethical behavior occur impulsively rather than as a result of deliberate planning. Mindfulness, with its capacity to enhance both the rational and the intuitive ethical decision-making systems, emerges as an ideal approach to both impulsive and deliberate workplace unethical behaviors. By cultivating mindfulness among employees, organizations can create an environment that promotes ethical decision-making and mitigates the occurrence of unethical behaviors. This fact suggests that incorporating mindfulness-based interventions into management practices can effectively decrease unethical behaviors in the workplace.

Key words: unethical behavior, mindfulness, dual-system theory, intervention, ethical decision-making

中图分类号: