IOT-Based  Human  Vital  Sign  Monitoring  Tool Using  Telegram  Notifications (BPM  and  Respiration  Rate  Parameters)

Rizky Dwi K; M. Prastawa Assalim Tetraputra; Abdul Kholiq

doi:10.35882/teknokes.v16i4.622

Rizky Dwi K Department of Electromedical Engineering, Poltekkes Kemenkes Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
M. Prastawa Assalim Tetraputra Department of Electromedical Engineering, Poltekkes Kemenkes Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
Abdul Kholiq Department of Electromedical Engineering, Poltekkes Kemenkes Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35882/teknokes.v16i4.622

Keywords: Smartband, Multiplexer, SEN0203, MLX90614, BPM, Temperature

Abstract

Vital signs play a crucial role in monitoring the progress of adult or pediatric patients during hospitalization, as they enable prompt detection of delayed recovery or adverse events. Vital signs are measured to obtain fundamental indicators of the patient's health status. The measurement of vital signs, including blood pressure, temperature, pulse, and respiratory rate, is the most common intervention in hospital medicine. Advanced monitoring systems combine clinical and technological aspects to deliver innovative healthcare outcomes. Remote patient monitoring systems are increasingly becoming the cornerstone of healthcare delivery, replacing traditional manual recording with computer and smartphone-based electronic recording as a versatile and innovative health monitoring system. This study aims to design a Vital Sign Monitoring Parameter BPM and RR tool with Notifications via the IoT-Based Telegram application. The tool enables the monitoring of vital signs, particularly BPM and RR, regardless of the patient's location and at any given time. This allows doctors, health workers, and patients to stay informed about their health condition. Real-time display of vital sign data is available through the TFT LCD screen, and the data from the screen can be accessed via Telegram. The Telegram application will send notifications in the event of abnormal patient conditions. MAX30100, a digital sensor for detecting breathing rate and heart rate, is utilized in this research. Furthermore, the data obtained shows errors that are within the allowable limits for each parameter. The difference between the heart rate readings and the respiratory rate values on the device and the patient monitor is 1.14% for heart rate and 0.84% for respiratory rate. This study indicates that it is time to monitor vital signs that can be seen remotely and have a system that is an inexpensive and easy-to-operate device for health workers without interfering with activities of daily living.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S. Luthfiyah, E. R. Ramadhani, T. B. Indrato, A. Wongjan, and K. O. Lawal, “Vital Signs Monitoring Device with BPM and SpO2 Notification Using Telegram Application Based on Thinger.io Platform,” Indones. J. Electron. Electromed. Eng. Med. Informatics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2022, doi: 10.35882/ijeeemi.v4i1.1.

H. Zahid et al., “Portable Smart Mini Patient Monitor for Improved Healthcare Outcomes: Patient-Based Care Device,” Pak. J. Sci., vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 88–95, 2021.

M. Harford, J. Catherall, S. Gerry, J. D. Young, and P. Watkinson, “Availability and performance of image-based, non-contact methods of monitoring heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation: A systematic review,” Physiol. Meas., vol. 40, no. 6, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab1f1d.

Z. Ar, O. Al, and A. Ap, “COVID-19 pandemic management : a multi- parameter portable healthcare monitoring device,” Int. J. Biosens. Bioelectron. Res., vol. 7, no. November, pp. 116–120, 2021, doi: 10.15406/ijbsbe.2021.07.00224.

J. Gleichauf et al., “Automated non-contact respiratory rate monitoring of neonates based on synchronous evaluation of a 3d time-of-flight camera and a microwave interferometric radar sensor,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 9, 2021, doi: 10.3390/s21092959.

I. Wheatley, “Respiratory rate 5: using this vital sign to detect deterioration,” Nurs. Times, vol. 114, no. 10, pp. 45–46, 2018.

A. R. Zizzo, I. Kirkegaard, J. Hansen, N. Uldbjerg, and H. Mølgaard, “Fetal Heart Rate Variability Is Affected by Fetal Movements: A Systematic Review,” Front. Physiol., vol. 11, no. September, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.578898.

Izhangghani, I. Hikmah, and Slamet Indriyanto, “Prototype of Body Temperature and Oxygen Saturation Monitoring System Using DS18B20 and MAX30100 Sensors based on IOT,” J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 810–817, 2022, doi: 10.29207/resti.v6i5.4385.

R. Austin, F. Lobo, and S. Rajaguru, “GSM and Arduino Based Vital Sign Monitoring System,” Open Biomed. Eng. J., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 78–89, 2021, doi: 10.2174/1874120702115010078.

Q. N. Alsahi, A. F. Marhoon, and A. H. Hamad, “Remote Patient Healthcare surveillance system based real-time vital signs,” Al-Khwarizmi Eng. J., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 41–51, 2020, doi: 10.22153/kej.2020.10.003.

F. Aktas, C. Ceken, and Y. E. Erdemli, “IoT-Based Healthcare Framework for Biomedical Applications,” J. Med. Biol. Eng., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 966–979, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s40846-017-0349-7.

A. Wongjan, A. Julsereewong, and P. Julsereewong, “Continuous Measurements of ECG and SpO 2 for Cardiology Information System,” MultiConference Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. II, pp. 18–21, 2009.

A. Nemcova et al., “Monitoring of heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, and blood pressure using a smartphone,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 59, p. 101928, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2020.101928.

S. Mayya, V. Jilla, V. N. Tiwari, M. M. Nayak, and R. Narayanan, “Continuous monitoring of stress on smartphone using heart rate variability,” 2015 IEEE 15th Int. Conf. Bioinforma. Bioeng. BIBE 2015, no. c, 2015, doi: 10.1109/BIBE.2015.7367627.

B. De Ridder, B. Van Rompaey, J. K. Kampen, S. Haine, and T. Dilles, “Smartphone Apps Using Photoplethysmography for Heart Rate Monitoring: Meta-Analysis,” JMIR Cardio, vol. 2, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.2196/cardio.8802.

A. S. Utomo, E. H. P. Negoro, and M. Sofie, “Monitoring Heart Rate Dan Saturasi Oksigen Melalui Smartphone,” Simetris J. Tek. Mesin, Elektro dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 319–324, 2019, doi: 10.24176/simet.v10i1.3024.

C.-L. Ho, Y.-C. Fu, M.-C. Lin, S.-C. Chan, B. Hwang, and S.-L. Jan, “Smartphone Applications (Apps) for Heart Rate Measurement in Children: Comparison with Electrocardiography Monitor,” Pediatr. Cardiol., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 726–731, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s00246-013-0844-8.

J. Turner, C. Zellner, T. Khan, and K. Yelamarthi, “Continuous heart rate monitoring using smartphone,” IEEE Int. Conf. Electro Inf. Technol., pp. 324–326, 2017, doi: 10.1109/EIT.2017.8053379.

R. B. Lagido, J. Lobo, S. Leite, C. Sousa, L. Ferreira, and J. Silva-Cardoso, “Using the smartphone camera to monitor heart rate and rhythm in heart failure patients,” 2014 IEEE-EMBS Int. Conf. Biomed. Heal. Informatics, BHI 2014, pp. 556–559, 2014, doi: 10.1109/BHI.2014.6864425.

S. Shofiyah, I. D. G. Hari Wisana, T. Triwiyanto, and S. Luthfiyah, “Measuring Respiration Rate Via Android,” Indones. J. Electron. Electromed. Eng. Med. informatics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 20–26, 2019, doi: 10.35882/ijeeemi.v1i1.4.

M. Hernandez-Silveira et al., “Assessment of the feasibility of an ultra-low power, wireless digital patch for the continuous ambulatory monitoring of vital signs,” BMJ Open, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1–9, 2015, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006606.

P. S. Das et al., “A Wearable Multisensor Patch for Breathing Pattern Recognition,” vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 10924–10934, 2023, doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3264942.

G. Cinel, “Wearable respiratory rate sensor technology for diagnosis of sleep apnea”.

A. J. Puspitasari, D. Famella, M. Sulthonur Ridwan, and M. Khoiri, “Design of low-flow oxygen monitor and control system for respiration and SpO2 rates optimization,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1436, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1436/1/012042.

N. Hayward et al., “A capaciflector provides continuous and accurate respiratory rate monitoring for patients at rest and during exercise,” J. Clin. Monit. Comput., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1535–1546, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10877-021-00798-7.

J. Tosi, F. Taffoni, M. Santacatterina, R. Sannino, and D. Formica, “Performance evaluation of bluetooth low energy: A systematic review,” Sensors (Switzerland), vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 1–34, 2017, doi: 10.3390/s17122898.

V. V. Tipparaju, K. R. Mallires, D. Wang, F. Tsow, and X. Xian, “Mitigation of data packet loss in bluetooth low energy-based wearable healthcare ecosystem,” Biosensors, vol. 11, no. 10, 2021, doi: 10.3390/bios11100350.