Logo-jskums
J Shahrekord Univ Med Sci. 2023;25(3): 115-123.
doi: 10.34172/jsums.2023.681
  Abstract View: 243
  PDF Download: 217

Original Article

Effect of watercress seed mucilage (Lepidium sativum L.) on the wound healing in New Zealand rabbits

Faezeh Dehestani Ardakani 1 ORCID logo, Elham Salehi 1* ORCID logo, Majid Morovati-Sharifabad 1 ORCID logo, Amin Paidar Ardakani 2 ORCID logo, Mohammad Saeed Heydarnejad 3 ORCID logo

1 Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ardakan University, Ardakan, Iran
2 Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ardakan University, Ardakan, Iran
3 Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Elham Salehi,, Email: esalehi@ardakan.ac.ir

Abstract

Background and aims: Wound healing is one of the most important issues in medical science. Synthetic drugs have long been introduced and used to speed up the healing process of wounds, but most of them have many side effects. The present study was performed to evaluate the healing efficiency of watercress seed mucilage (Lepidium sativum L.) on wounds.

Methods: In this study, the animals were randomly divided into five groups. The treatment groups were (1), (2), (3), sham (4), and control (5). The treatment groups were treated with 20%, 10%, and 5% watercress seed mucilage in the Eucerin base, respectively, and the sham was treated with Eucerin, while the control received no treatment. Then, 5 pairs of full-thickness wounds with a diameter of 7 mm were created on both sides of the rabbit’s spine. Macroscopic and wound area studies were performed on days 4, 7, and 14 after surgery.

Results: According to the analysis of variance, there was a significant difference between groups 1, 2, 3, sham, and control (P=0.001), but no significant difference was observed between group 3, sham group, and control group (P=0.993). Based on these findings, at the end of the treatment period, group 1 had the highest healing rate and the lowest wound area (1.12±0.77) compared to group 2 (4.42±0.30) and 3 (7.05±0.35), as well as the sham (8.34±1.10) and control (8.50±1.90) groups. Thus, the treatment method of this group has been more effective in wound healing than that of the other treatment groups.

Conclusion: It seems that watercress seed mucilage can treat wounds due to its important compounds such as flavonoids, phenols, and vitamins A and C.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 244

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 217

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 30 Apr 2022
Revision: 24 Sep 2022
Accepted: 26 Sep 2022
ePublished: 25 Apr 2023
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)