Couverture fascicule

«Seith Moyses by the Devel»: a Problem in Chaucer's Parson's Tale

[article]

doc-ctrl/global/pdfdoc-ctrl/global/pdf
doc-ctrl/global/textdoc-ctrl/global/textdoc-ctrl/global/imagedoc-ctrl/global/imagedoc-ctrl/global/zoom-indoc-ctrl/global/zoom-indoc-ctrl/global/zoom-outdoc-ctrl/global/zoom-outdoc-ctrl/global/bookmarkdoc-ctrl/global/bookmarkdoc-ctrl/global/resetdoc-ctrl/global/reset
doc-ctrl/page/rotate-ccwdoc-ctrl/page/rotate-ccw doc-ctrl/page/rotate-cwdoc-ctrl/page/rotate-cw
Page 61

<( SEITH MOÏSES Bï THE DEVEL : » A PROBLEM IN CHAUCER'S PARSON'S TALE

In his discussion of how « synne wexeth or encreesseth in man », Chaucer's Parson makes a rather startling Scriptural allusion :

And of this matere seith Moyses by the devel in this manere : « The f eend seith, ' I wol chace and pursue the man by wikked suggestioun, and I wol hente hym by moevynge or stirynge of synne. And I wol départe my prise or my praye by deliberacioun, and my lust shal been acompliced in délit. I wol drawe my swerd in consentynge' — / for certes, right as a swerd departeth a thyng in two peces, right so consentynge departeth God fro man — 'and thanne wol I sleen hym with my η hand in dede of synne' ; thus seith the feend » (2).

Robinson fears that the Parson has here triumphantly vindicated his claim to not being « textueel », (3) and calls the allusion a « supposed utterance of Moses » (4). However, despite a somewhat aprocryphal appearance, the passage does have real Scriptural basis. The difficulty would seem to be

(2) Vv. 355-35G (Complete Works of Chaucer, ed. F. N. Robinson [Boston, 1933], p. 283).

(3) The « Parson's Prologue », 1. 57 (ibid., p. 272).

(4) Note to v. 355 (ibid., p. 876).

doc-ctrl/page/rotate-ccwdoc-ctrl/page/rotate-ccw doc-ctrl/page/rotate-cwdoc-ctrl/page/rotate-cw
doc-ctrl/page/rotate-ccwdoc-ctrl/page/rotate-ccw doc-ctrl/page/rotate-cwdoc-ctrl/page/rotate-cw
doc-ctrl/page/rotate-ccwdoc-ctrl/page/rotate-ccw doc-ctrl/page/rotate-cwdoc-ctrl/page/rotate-cw