Next Article in Journal
Effect of Revegetation in Extremely Degraded Grassland on Carbon Density in Alpine Permafrost Regions
Previous Article in Journal
RedNavi: Building a 3D Scene of the Current Sea from AIS Data
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characteristics of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Yellow Paddy Soils under Long-Term Organic Fertilizer Application

1
Guizhou Institute of Soil and Fertilizer, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550006, China
2
Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Arable Land Conservation and Agricultural Environment, Ministry of Agriculture, Guiyang 550006, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Sustainability 2022, 14(19), 12574; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912574
Submission received: 24 August 2022 / Revised: 27 September 2022 / Accepted: 28 September 2022 / Published: 2 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Agriculture)

Abstract

:
Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from rice fields is essential to respond to the national “dual-carbon” strategy, achieve green agricultural development, and ensure food security. The substitution of organic fertilizers for chemical fertilizers is an important means to achieve zero growth and has a positive impact on crop yield and soil nutrients; however, the impact on the greenhouse effect is inconsistent. The effects of organic fertilizers on soil greenhouse gas emissions vary depending on factors such as soil, geography, ecological environment, and human management. However, previous research has shown that the combined application of organic fertilizer can increase soil carbon storage and increase crop yield, and may be an effective fertilization measure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from yellow paddy fields. To clarify the effects of different ratios of organic fertilizer on the greenhouse gas emission characteristics of Guizhou yellow paddy soil, CH4, CO2, and N2O emissions from rice fields were monitored by static opaque chamber-gas chromatography, and the effects of different fertilization treatments on the cumulative greenhouse gas emissions and global warming potential (GWP) were investigated. Results showed that organic fertilizer application increased CH4 emissions from rice fields, and the effect increased with increasing organic fertilizer application. The peak period was from the heading stage to the filling and ripening stage, and there was almost no emission during the fallow period. Compared with the balanced application of chemical fertilizer (NPK), the treatment with organic fertilizer alone (M) significantly increased CO2 emissions, but the replacement of 1/2 chemical fertilizer nitrogen with 1/2 organic fertilizer (1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK) and the replacement of 1/4 chemical fertilizer nitrogen with 1/4 organic fertilizer (1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK) did not significantly increase CO2 emissions; emissions were 5% lower in the 1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK treatment than in the NPK treatment. Compared with the NPK treatment, the application of organic fertilizer alone significantly reduced N2O emissions by 32.16%, while the 1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK and 1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK treatments increased N2O emissions by 6.31% and 16.02%, respectively. However, there were no significant differences between the organic–inorganic combined treatments and NPK. During the flooding period, N2O emissions were relatively low, but the emissions increased rapidly after field drying. The application of organic fertilizer increased the GWP of rice fields. Compared with the NPK treatment, the M treatment increased GWP by 47.07%, 1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK increased GWP by 10.16%, and the 1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK treatment increased GWP by 2.93%. Except for the M treatment, the differences between treatments were not significant. Our results concluded that replacement of chemical fertilizers with organic fertilizers at a ratio of 1/4 to 1/2 did not significantly increase greenhouse gas emissions in rice fields, besides, it mitigate the greenhouse effect and increase soil carbon sequestration and yield in rice fields.

1. Introduction

With the rapid development of the economy and the increase in the human population, food security has been seriously challenged. As a decisive factor in increasing grain production, chemical fertilizers have played a pivotal role in production, but the continuous increase in chemical fertilizers over the past 20 years has led to decreased yield, a continuous decline in soil quality and excessive waste of nutrient resources [1]. Nitrogen loss from farmland in China accounts for approximately 30–70% of the total amount of chemical nitrogen fertilizer; the loss from paddy fields is higher than that in drylands, and the uptake and utilization rate of nitrogen in one rice season is only 35% [2]. Fertilizer nitrogen is released into the atmosphere through nitrification–denitrification to produce N2O, which impacts both CO2 and CH4 emissions [3]. Thus, the improvement in farmland quality through rational fertilization and other farmland management measures are of great importance to alleviating China’s food insecurity, resource consumption and improving environmental protection. Organic fertilizer has become important in China’s agricultural production because of its rich organic and inorganic nutrients. The substitution of organic fertilizers for chemical fertilizers is an important way to achieve zero growth, which has a positive impact on crop yield and soil nutrients; however, its impact on the greenhouse effect is uncertain because both the nature of the organic fertilizer and the ecological environment of the farmland have important impacts on greenhouse gas emissions. To this end, it is necessary to systematically conduct regional greenhouse gas emission studies on paddy fields and propose fertilization measures tailored to local conditions; it is the key goal of our research to maintain or increase rice yield through appropriate fertilization patterns while reducing the effect of global warming.
Climate change is a global challenge. To avoid a continuous rise in temperature, the Paris Agreement stated that the temperature increase in this century should be limited to less than 1.5 °C [4]. CO2, CH4, and N2O are major greenhouse gases, and reducing their emissions is critical to suppressing global temperature rise [5]. Farmland greenhouse gas emissions are one of the main sources of greenhouse gases worldwide: 5–20% of CO2, 15–30% of CH4 and 80–90% of N2O in the atmosphere come from farmland soil emissions each year [3]. Paddy soil is one of the most important sources of CH4 emissions, and the total annual CH4 emissions from paddy fields account for approximately 20% of the total annual worldwide emissions of anthropogenic CH4 [6]. Therefore, without reasonable emission reduction measures, it is predicted that farmland soils will increase CH4 emissions by 50–60% and N2O emissions by 35–60% by 2030 compared with 2005 [7,8].
Rice is the main food of nearly 50% of the world population; production is mainly distributed within Asia, and China is the world’s largest rice producer. In 2021, the total cultivated area in China reached 29.9 million ha [9]. The anaerobic environment caused by the long-term flooding of rice fields results in CH4 production [10]. The global CH4 emissions from rice fields are approximately 2.5 × 104 Gg, accounting for 24% of global agricultural CH4 emissions. The CH4 emissions from rice fields in China are approximately 5.4 × 103 Gg, accounting for approximately 21.5% of the worldwide total CH4 emissions from rice fields [11]. On the basis of ensuring food security, reducing greenhouse gas emissions from rice fields is essential to supporting the national “dual-carbon” strategy and achieving green agricultural development.
The generation and emission of greenhouse gases are affected by factors such as soil temperature, moisture, fertility, and farmland management measures [12,13,14,15]. The characteristics of greenhouse gas emissions under various fertilization treatments are inconsistent. Compared with the application of chemical fertilizers alone, the application of organic fertilizers alone or the combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers could significantly promote soil CH4 emissions while inhibiting N2O emissions [3,16]. The results of studies on the characteristics of CO2 emissions are rather inconsistent. Some scholars argue that the combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers has no significant effect on CO2 emissions [17]. Some results also showed that CO2 emissions under the application of organic fertilizer alone were lower [18], while the emissions under the combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers were higher than those under chemical fertilizer use alone. However, the emissions were higher than those with single application of chemical fertilizer. The application of organic fertilizers can increase global warming potential (GWP) [19,20,21], but the effects of the combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers on GWP have been variable. Yang et al. [22] found that the combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers could increase the GWP of soil, while Gao et al. [23] drew the opposite conclusion. Another study concluded that there was no significant effect on GWP [24]. In the early stage, many scholars found that the greenhouse gas emission intensity under organic fertilizer application alone, or in combination with chemical fertilizer treatment, was lower than that of chemical fertilizer application alone [16,20,25]; however, some studies have reported the opposite results [21]. The effects of organic fertilizers on soil greenhouse gas emissions vary depending on factors such as soil, geography, ecological environment, and human management methods. In this study, we conducted a long-term investigation of the characteristics of greenhouse gas emissions from yellow paddy soils in central Guizhou under different substitution ratios of organic fertilizer in a long-term experiment. The aim was to identify suitable organic fertilizer substitution ratios for achieving sustainable production, reducing chemical fertilizer use, and promoting environmentally friendly rice cultivation; the results further provide a technical reference and data support for regional sustainable agricultural development, carbon sequestration, and emissions reductions in farmland. Increasing rice production and reducing environmental costs are important to ensure China’s food security and build a healthy ecological environment. Our previous research found that the application of organic fertilizer can significantly increase the effective panicle number of rice and thus significantly increase the rice yield, and there was no significant difference between the combined application of organic fertilizer and inorganic fertilizer and the application of pure organic fertilizer [26]. We also found that the application of organic fertilizer can significantly improve the soil carbon storage capacity [27]. Thus, the combined application of organic fertilizer can increase soil carbon storage and increase crop yield. and may be an effective fertilization strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from yellow paddy fields.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Overview of the Experimental Area

This study is based on the long-term site experiment by the Scientific Observation and Experimental Station of Arable Land Conservation and Agricultural Environment (Guizhou), the Ministry of Agriculture, which is located at the Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Huaxi District, Guiyang, Guizhou Province (106°39′52″ E, 26°29′49″ N). The station is situated in the hilly region of yellow soil in central Guizhou, with a subtropical monsoon climate. The average altitude is 1071 m, the average annual temperature is 15.3 °C, the average annual sunshine duration is approximately 1354 h, the relative humidity is 75.5%, the annual frost-free period is approximately 270 days, and the annual precipitation ranges from 1100 to 1200 mm. The soil type at the experimental site is yellow paddy soil. Continuous monitoring of the long-term site experiment began in 1995. The basic physicochemical properties of the initial soil samples (0–20 cm) were as follows: organic matter, 44.9 g·kg−1; total nitrogen, 1.96 g·kg−1; total phosphorus, 0.95 g·kg−1; total potassium, 16.4 g·kg−1; alkaline hydrolyzable nitrogen, 159 mg·kg−1; available phosphorus, 13.4 mg·kg−1; available potassium, 294 mg·kg−1; and pH, 6.75.

2.2. Experimental Design

The long-term site experiment was designed as a large-scale comparative experiment, with a total rice planting area of 2814 m2; each plot was 201 m2 (35.7 m length × 5.6 m width). In this study, four plots were selected, including the balanced application of chemical fertilizer (NPK), 1/4 organic fertilizer to replace 1/4 chemical fertilizer nitrogen (1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK), 1/2 organic fertilizer to replace 1/2 chemical fertilizer nitrogen (1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK), and organic fertilizer alone (M). The chemical fertilizers used in the experiment were urea (containing 46.0% N), calcium superphosphate (containing 12.0% P2O5), and potassium chloride (containing 60% K2O). The commercial organic fertilizer was fermented from cow manure (dry matter ratio: 25.5%; organic matter content: 44.5%; N: 3.04%; P2O5: 0.44%; K2O: 2.75%) (Guizhou Wuguhui Ecological Agriculture Technology Co.). Except for the different application rates of P and K in the M treatment, the pure N, P, and K inputs of the other treatments were identical. The chemical nitrogen fertilizer was applied in two topdressings with a 40%:60% ratio of striking root fertilizer to tillering fertilizer (Table 1). The tested rice variety was Yixiangyou 800, which was transplanted on 9 June 2021. The first topdressing (striking root fertilizer) was conducted on 20 June, the second topdressing (tillering/heading fertilizer) was conducted on 6 July, and field drying began on approximately 14 September. The rice fields were not irrigated until 8 October, and the fields were tilled and dried in winter. Except for the difference in fertilization, all the treatments were consistent in other aspects of agricultural management.
The sampling device was positioned in the field relative to the three equal parts of the test site, and three static boxes (one on the top, one in the middle and one on the bottom) were placed at each test site. By eliminating the side row, the base was selected in the test area for more convenient later sample collection with minimal human disturbance; the base remained unchanged throughout the test cycle, and the rice planting density in the box was unchanged. Each time a sample was taken, the field was entered and the water surface was allowed to stabilize for five minutes without fluctuation; the gas sample was then collected according to the collection specifications. Gas samples were collected after rice transplanting on 11 June 2021 and collected once every 7 days as well as after fertilization; collection was postponed in the case of heavy rain. The sampling frequency was reduced to twice a month after rice harvest, and the last date of testing was December 31, 2021; the total collection period was up to 7 months.

2.3. Sample Collection and Analysis

A closed static opaque chamber method was used to collect the gas. The sampling device was made of stainless steel and mainly consisted of a top box (50 cm × 50 cm × 50 cm), a middle box (50 cm × 50 cm × 50 cm), and a base (50 cm × 50 cm × 15 cm). The exterior of the entire box was wrapped with a reflective, thermally insulated film; and a small fan, a temperature meter, a pressure balance tube, and a gas sampling port were installed inside the top box. In this study, soil CH4, CO2, and N2O emissions were monitored after rice transplanting. Samples were collected once every 7 days. After topdressing, the sampling time was fixed at 8:00 to 11:00 am. Before each measurement, the tank was filled with water and inserted into the box to form an airtight space. At 0, 15, and 30 min after the fan was turned on, 200 mL of air was pumped into the aluminum foil air bag using a syringe (connected with a three-way valve), and the temperature in the box was recorded at the same time.
Gas sample analysis was performed using an Agilent GC-7890A gas chromatograph. The CH4 and CO2 detectors were flame ionization detectors (FIDs), the carrier gas was nitrogen, the detector temperature was 250 °C, the separation column temperature was 55 °C, and the N2O detector was an electron capture detector (ECD). The carrier gas was nitrogen, the detection temperature was 350 °C, and the column temperature was 55 °C. The reference gas was purchased from the National Sharing Platform for Reference Materials of the National Institute of Metrology.

2.4. Calculation and Data Processing

The formula for calculating gas emission flux [28] is:
F = ρ × H × Δ c Δ t × 273 273 + T
where F is the greenhouse gas emission flux (the unit of CO2 and CH4 emission fluxes is mg·m−2·h−1;the unit of N2O emission flux is μg·m−2·h−1), ρ is the density of the greenhouse gas in the standard state in kg·m−3, H is the net height of the sampling box in m, Δc/Δt is the rate of change in greenhouse gas concentration in the sampling box in μL·l−1·h−1, and T is the temperature in the sampling box in °C.
The formula for calculating cumulative emissions is:
f = i = 1 n F i + 1 + F i 2 × ( t i + 1 t i ) × 24
where f is the cumulative greenhouse gas emissions in kg·hm−2, F is the greenhouse gas emission flux, n is the total number of samples, i is the number index of a sample, and t i + 1 t i is the number of days between two sampling events.
GWP on a 100-yr time scale is generally expressed in terms of CO2 equivalents:
GWP = CO 2 + 25 × f ( CH 4 ) + 298 × f ( N 2 O )
where GWP is the global warming potential in kg·hm−2, and f (CH4) and f (N2O) are the total seasonal CH4 and N2O emissions, respectively, in kg·hm−2.
SPSS 22.0 software was used for the one-way ANOVA, and the significance of differences was analyzed using LSD (Least Significant Difference) test; and univariate analysis of General Linear Model (GLM) was performed to determine interactions between variables; the significance level was set to α = 0.05. Excel 2010 was used for data processing, analysis, and plotting.

3. Results

3.1. Methane Emission Characteristics

There were significant differences in CH4 emission fluxes from rice fields with different fertilization treatments. As shown in Figure 1, the CH4 emission flux continuously increased after rice transplanting, and the emission peak lasted from the end of the heading and flowering stages to the beginning of the grain filling stage. The treatments, in order of emission flux amount (mg·m−2·h−1), were M (15.90) > 1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK (8.93) > 1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK (5.18) > NPK (4.27), with a significant decrease in the later stage until the CH4 emission flux was almost zero during the fallow period. The mean CH4 emission flux (mg·m−2·h−1) during the monitoring period of each treatment in descending order was M (5.17) > 1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK (2.90) > 1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK (1.60) > NPK (1.14). The results of this study showed that the complete replacement of chemical fertilizers by organic fertilizers could significantly increase CH4 emissions from yellow paddy soil, but the appropriate ratio of organic replacement could significantly reduce peak and average emissions.
As shown in Table 2 below, the order of the contribution of CH4 emissions to the total emissions during the entire monitoring period (d) at different stages of each treatment was as follows: heading and flowering stage (21) > grain filling stage (33) > jointing and booting stage (22) > tillering stage (21) > seedling stage (15) > fallow period (92). During the fallow period, except for the 1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK treatment, which generated a small amount of CH4 emissions, the treatments all showed net CH4 absorption. The characteristics of CH4 emissions from different treatments during the entire monitoring period indicate that CH4 emissions were concentrated in the middle and late stages of rice growth, and there was almost no emission during the fallow period. Overall, there was no significant difference in emissions between the NPK treatment and 1/4 organic fertilizer substitution, which is the ratio of organic fertilizer replacement recommended based on comprehensive consideration of factors such as the economic benefits of production.

3.2. Carbon Dioxide Emission Characteristics

After rice transplantation, the CO2 emission flux increased continuously, with a total of three emission peaks. The first peak occurred on August 7 (the end of the heading and flowering period), the second peak occurred on September 3 (the beginning of the grain filling period), the third peak occurred approximately two weeks after field drying, and the CO2 emission flux was significantly reduced during the fallow period. The treatments ordered by the highest peak CO2 emissions (mg·m−2·h−1) were as follows: M (1866.18) > 1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK (1401.52) > NPK (1361.71) > 1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK (1231.95). Treatments were ranked by average emission flux (mg·m−2·h−1) as follows: M (621.51) > 1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK (521.34) > NPK (486.76) > 1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK (448.34). The application of organic fertilizer alone significantly increased the CO2 emissions from the rice field, but the difference between the organic fertilizer substitution treatments and the NPK treatment was not significant, and the 1/2 organic fertilizer substitution slightly reduced the emission value (Figure 2).
The growing stages (d) were ordered by CO2 emissions as follows: grain filling stage (33) > heading and flowering stage (21) > fallow period (92) > jointing and booting stage (22) > tillering stage (21) > seedling stage (15) (Table 3). There were no significant differences in CO2 emissions among the treatments during the initial stage. There were no significant differences between the 1/2 organic fertilizer substitution and NPK treatments in the jointing and booting stage or the heading and flowering stage, and emissions were higher in the remaining treatments. Emissions were higher in the M treatment than in the other treatments during the grain filling stage and fallow period, and there were no significant differences among the other treatments. If only the effect of fertilizer use on CO2 emissions is considered, 1/2 organic substitution is a suitable organic substitution ratio.

3.3. Characteristics of Nitrous Oxide Emissions

The characteristics of N2O emissions from rice fields are greatly affected by soil moisture. During the flooding period, N2O emissions are relatively small and are often accompanied by N2O absorption. There were two emission peaks in this study. The first peak occurred on September 30 (two weeks after field drying), and the second emission peak occurred on October 21 (fallow period). Soil N2O emissions were high throughout the fallow period. Treatments were ordered by highest peak N2O emissions (µg·m−2·h−1) as follows: 1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK (61.73) > 1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK (61.65) > NPK (55.70) > M (36.06). Treatments were ordered by average N2O emission flux (µg·m−2·h−1) as follows: NPK (11.37) > 1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK (11.17) > 1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK (9.97) > M (6.19). Compared with the NPK treatment, the application of organic fertilizer reduced N2O emissions from the rice field, and the M treatment exhibited the most significant effect (Figure 3).
As shown in Table 4, N2O emissions during the rice growth period accounted for a very small proportion of the emissions during the entire monitoring period, and N2O emissions during the fallow period were relatively high. The rice growth period accounted for 16.27% of the total N2O emissions in the NPK treatment, and the fallow period accounted for 16.27%. The M treatment showed a net N2O absorption throughout the reproductive period and 105.20% emissions during the fallow period. The contributions of the growth and fallow periods to N2O emissions under 1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK were 4.03% and 95.97%, respectively. The contributions under 1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK were 7.28% and 92.72% during the growth period and fallow period, respectively.
GHG fluxes varied greatly between treatments during the same growth period and during different growth periods for the same fertilizer treatment, which supports the conclusion that GHG emissions are affected by the interaction of the multiple factors described above. The data in Table 5 indicate that the effects of treatment and growth period and their interactions on CH4 and N2O emission fluxes were highly significant, CO2 emission fluxes were significantly affected by treatment, and the effects of growth period and the interactions between the growth period and treatment on CO2 emission fluxes were also highly significant.

3.4. Cumulative Emissions and Warming Potential

Treatments were ordered by total CH4 emissions as follows: M > 1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK > 1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK > NPK. Compared with NPK, emissions were 357.75% higher in M, 156.13% higher in 1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK, and 42.80% higher in 1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK, and the values were not significantly different between the NPK and 1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK treatments. Treatments were ordered by total CO2 emissions as follows: M > 1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK > NPK > 1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK (Table 6). Compared with NPK, CO2 emissions were 31.60% higher in M and 8.39% higher in 1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK, while they were 5.14% lower in 1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK. Except for the M treatment, the differences between treatments were not significant. Treatments were ordered by total N2O emissions as follows: 1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK > 1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK > NPK > M. Compared with NPK, emissions declined in the M treatment by 32.16%, and the 1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK and 1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK treatments increased emissions by 6.31% and 16.02%, respectively, indicating that there were no significant differences between treatments except for the M treatment. Treatments were ranked in descending order of GWP as M > 1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK > 1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK > NPK. Compared with the NPK treatment, emissions were higher in M by 47.07%, in 1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK by 10.16%, and in 1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK by 2.93%, indicating that there were no significant differences between treatments except for the M treatment.
In summary, the application of organic fertilizer significantly increased the amount of CH4 emissions from the paddy soil, and the level of CH4 emissions increased proportionally with increasing organic fertilizer application. There was no significant difference in CH4 emissions between the 1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK treatment and the NPK treatment. Organic fertilizer alone significantly reduced soil N2O emissions but significantly promoted soil CO2 emissions and increased the GWP of rice fields. However, there were no significant differences in the indicators between partial replacement with organic fertilizer and the application of chemical fertilizer alone.

4. Discussion

4.1. Methane Emissions

Organic fertilizer plays important roles in improving soil structure, regulating water and fertilizer, and balancing soil nutrients [29,30]. The application of organic fertilizer to the soil provides a large amount of carbon for methanogens, thereby significantly promoting the production of CH4 [31]. The decomposition of organic matter reduces the soil oxidation–reduction potential, thereby increasing the activity of methanogens [32]. In addition, the available nutrients provided by organic fertilizers create a better ecological environment for microorganisms, which improves soil microbial activity and diversity and promotes the growth of methanogens to increase CH4 emissions [25]. The application of organic fertilizers improves the physical and chemical properties of soil, promotes the growth and development of rice roots, and releases more root exudates. The hydrocarbons, organic acids, and amino acids secreted by roots are fermented into CH3COOH, CO2, and H2 under anaerobic conditions, thereby forming CH4 under the action of methanogens [33]. Soil CH4 emissions were lower in the treatments with chemical fertilizer application, perhaps because the application of chemical fertilizer significantly increased the contents of ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen in the soil, ammonium nitrogen increased the activity of methane-oxidizing bacteria, and the generated CH4 was oxidized. Under flooded anaerobic conditions, nitrate nitrogen competes with methanogens for substrate denitrification, thereby reducing the amount of CH4 produced [25]. It has been found that 98% of CH4 emissions are discharged to the atmosphere through plant aeration tissues [34]. The results of this study showed that CH4 emissions changed correspondingly with the growth of rice, and the trend was consistent with the results of Wei et al. [33]. From the seedling stage to the tillering stage, the root system of rice is well developed and can produce many root exudates, thereby promoting the production and emission of CH4. At the booting stage (approximately July 23), the transfer of organic matter to the panicle leads to a decrease in root exudates, and the oxidative capacity of root cells is stronger at this time, so CH4 production and emission are reduced. At the heading stage, the aging and death of some roots are accompanied by an increase in black roots, which provide abundant substrates for methanogens and promote the production of CH4. At this stage, the oxidative capacity of the root system is low, so emissions increase. Consistent with the results of Yang et al. [22], the aeration of the soil was improved after field drying, the level of CH4 production decreased, and the amount of oxidation increased, so there was almost no emission during the fallow period.

4.2. Carbon Dioxide Emissions

CO2 emissions are determined by both plant and soil respiration and are also affected by conditions such as rice plant growth and environmental temperature [22]. One month after rice transplantation, plant respiration is relatively weak. In this study, after the tillering stage, the plants grew rapidly, respiration was enhanced, and CO2 emissions gradually increased. The peak period of CO2 emissions was from the heading stage to the maturity stage. As the rice plants grew and the ambient temperature increased, the CO2 emission levels were high until the rice matured and was harvested. After rice harvest, plant respiration was significantly reduced, and the CO2 emissions in the different treatments ranged from 55.29 to 298.90 mg·m−2·h−1. The peak CO2 emissions and the average emission flux were higher under organic fertilizer alone than under chemical fertilizer alone. However, there was no significant difference between the organic fertilizer replacement treatments and chemical fertilizer alone. The discrepancies between the results of previous studies on whether organic fertilizer application promotes CO2 emissions are due to the combined effects of environmental factors and other variables. However, in general, organic fertilizers can increase CO2 emissions by improving soil microbial activity, promoting rice root growth, increasing plant biomass, and increasing soil mineralization [20,35]; the appropriate ratio of organic fertilizer to chemical fertilizer can help reduce CO2 emissions.

4.3. Nitrous Oxide Emissions

N2O is an intermediate product of nitrification and denitrification, and changes in soil moisture and fertilization conditions cause dynamic changes [22]. The long-term anaerobic environment of flooded rice fields inhibits the progress of nitrification, and the N2O produced by denitrification is further reduced to N2. Therefore, in this study, the N2O emission fluxes were all at low levels during the flooding period and were often accompanied by absorption. Before field drying, the soil N2O emission flux varied between −21.24 and 18.04 µg·m−2·h−1. After field drying, the N2O emission flux increased rapidly, and the maximum emission during the fallow period was as high as 61.73 µg·m−2·h−1. The N2O emissions over the entire growth period accounted for only −5.20 to 16.27% of the total emissions in the different treatments, while the fallow period accounted for 83.73–105.20% of the total emissions. The treatments were ranked by total N2O emissions (kg·hm−2) during the growth period as follows: NPK (0.129) > 1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK (0.067) > 1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK (0.034) > M (−0.027), indicating that the application of chemical fertilizer alone promoted N2O emissions during the flooding period, while the application of organic fertilizer reduced the total N2O emissions during the growth period [36]. In addition, N2O emissions decreased with increasing proportion of organic fertilizer application because the application of chemical fertilizer can rapidly increase the content of available N in the soil, which provides an abundant substrate for nitrification and denitrification, resulting in an increase in N2O emissions; in contrast, the effect of organic fertilizer on increasing soil available N lags behind that of chemical fertilizer. The application of organic fertilizers can inhibit the activity of denitrifying enzymes and reduce the nitrification potential, thereby reducing N2O emissions [25]. The N2O emission characteristics in the fallow period were different. The N2O emissions under organic fertilizer combined with chemical fertilizer were 21.84–28.46% higher than those under chemical fertilizer alone. This finding may be related to the fact that combined organic–inorganic fertilizer application provides both a substrate for nitrification and denitrification and a carbon source available to microorganisms and promotes the growth of denitrifying bacteria [35].

4.4. Cumulative Emissions and Global Warming Potential

Organic fertilizer alone significantly increased the GWP of rice fields, which is consistent with the results of Qian et al. [21]. The GWP value under the combined application of organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer was slightly higher than that in the treatment with chemical fertilizer alone, but the differences between treatments were not significant exception for the M treatment, which is also consistent with the results of a previous study [24,37]. The partial replacement of chemical fertilizers by organic fertilizers reduces chemical fertilizer input, improving soil fertility and increasing rice yield [38,39,40]. For this reason, to avoid significantly increasing greenhouse gas emissions from rice fields, replacing chemical fertilizer N with organic fertilizer N at a ratio of 1/4 to 1/2 is recommended on the basis of this experiment as a fertilizer application pattern that strengthens farmland and is environmentally friendly.

5. Conclusions

CH4 emissions from soil increased with increasing organic fertilizer application. Organic fertilizer alone significantly increased soil CO2 emissions, but there was no significant difference between the partial replacement of chemical fertilizer by organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer alone. Compared with the application of chemical fertilizer alone, the application of organic fertilizer reduced N2O emissions from the rice fields, and the M treatment exhibited the most significant effect. The application of organic fertilizer increased the GWP of the rice fields. Compared with chemical fertilizer alone, the application of organic fertilizer alone increased emissions by 47.07%, whereas the increases under partial organic fertilizer replacement were less than 10%; there were no significant differences between these treatments and the treatment with chemical fertilizer alone. Based on the results of this experiment and from previous experimental studies, replacing chemical fertilizer nitrogen with organic fertilizer nitrogen at a ratio of 1/4 to 1/2 is an excellent fertilization mode to reduce the greenhouse effect, increase soil carbon sequestration, and increase the yield of paddy fields.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the study’s conception, design, material preparation, data collection and analysis. Conceptualization, H.Z.; Methodology, Y.L. (Yanling Liu) and H.X.; Software, X.H. and Y.Y.; Supervision, Y.L. (Yu Li); Writing—original draft, Y.Z. and Y.N. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the Youth Science and Technology Fund of the Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences ([2021]12) and the Cultivation of Scientific and Technological Achievements and Personnel Training Project of the Guizhou Institute of Soil and Fertilizer ([2022]4). The study was also partially funded by the Technological Innovation of the Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences ([2022]09), the Basic Public Welfare Project of the Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences ([2022]05) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (41461069, 32060302 and 31860132).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, L.H. The impacts of paddy field management on greenhouse gas emissions-a case study in the Dasong river watershed. Master’s Thesis, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou Zhejiang China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhu, Z.L. Research on soil nitrogen supply and nitrogen fate in China. Soil 1985, 17, 2–9. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ren, F.L. Greenhouse gas Emissions under Application of Manure in Arable Land in China. Master’s Thesis, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  4. Colón-González, F.J.; Ian, H.; Osborn, T.J.; Steiner São, B.C.; Peres, C.A.; Hunter, P.R.; Lake, I.R. Limiting global-mean temperature increase to 1.5–2 °C could reduce the incidence and spatial spread of dengue fever in Latin America. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 6243–6248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Prinn, R.G. Development and application of earth system models. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 3673–3680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Wang, P.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, W. Estimates of methane emission from rice paddies in China over the period 1955–2005. Adv. Clim. Change Res. 2009, 5, 291–297. [Google Scholar]
  7. IPCC. Mitigation Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang, Y.M.; Hu, C.S.; Zhang, J.B.; Dong, W.X.; Wang, Y.Y.; Song, L.N. Research advances on source/sink intensities and greenhouse effects of CO2, CH4 and N2O in agricultural soils. Chin. J. Eco-Agric. 2011, 19, 966–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. National Bureay of Statistics. Available online: http://www.stats.gov (accessed on 20 September 2022).
  10. Zhang, Z.S.; Wang, B.F.; Li, Y.; Yang, X.L.; Hu, Y.; Wang, L.F.; Cheng, J.P. Effects of different nitrogen regimes on greenhouse gas emissions and grain yields in paddy fields. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 2020, 39, 1400–1408. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, T.Y.; Fan, D.; Song, K.F.; Zhang, G.B.; Xu, H.; Ma, J. Reduced methane and nitrous oxide emissions from ratoo rice paddy in Chaohu polder area, China. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 2021, 40, 1829–1838. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang, Y.Q.; Deng, C.F.; Luo, Z.Z.; Niu, Y.N.; Li, L.L.; Cai, L.Q.; Xie, J.H.; Ma, X. Characterization of greenhouse gas emissions from the alfalfa field in Loess Plateau during different planting years. Pratacultural Sci. 2020, 37, 30–40. [Google Scholar]
  13. Li, Y.S. Greenhouse gas Emission Characteristics of Spring Wheat Fields under Different N-Fertilized Levels on the Loess Plateau of Central Gansu Province. Master’s Thesis, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou Gansu China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  14. Li, B.B.; Wu, L.F. Soil greenhouse gases emission in response to the C/N. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 2018, 37, 2067–2078. [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu, K.C.; Wang, X.D.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, H.L. Technical effects and influencing factors of main methane emission management practices in China’s paddy fields. J. Jilin Agric. Univ. 2022, 44, 61–70. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ye, Z.H. Effect of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Combined Organic Fertilizer on Rice Growth and Gas Regulation Value in Paddy Field. Master’s Thesis, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang Liaoning China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  17. Xie, Y.Q.; Zhang, J.F.; Jiang, H.M.; Yang, J.C.; Deng, S.H.; Li, X.; Guo, J.M.; Li, L.L.; Liu, X.; Zhou, G.Y. Effects of different fertilization practices on greenhouse gas emissions from paddy soil. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 2015, 34, 578–584. [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu, C.H.; Fu, M.J.; Wu, F.R. Effect of different fertilizer types on emissions of greenhouse gas in the northern paddy. Hubei Agric. Sci. 2016, 55, 1653–1658. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yuan, J. Effects of Organic Fertilizer on the Methane Emission Mechanism in Rice Soil. Ph.D. Thesis, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  20. Guo, T.F.; Liang, G.Q.; Zhou, W.; Liu, D.H.; Wang, X.B.; Sun, J.W.; Li, S.L.; Hu, C. Effect of fertilizer management on greenhouse gas emission and nutrient status in paddy soil. J. Plant Nutr. 2016, 22, 337–345. [Google Scholar]
  21. Qian, D.; Hu, M.C.; Shen, W.S.; Lin, X.G.; Zhong, Z.F.; Qiu, C.W. Effects of Different Organic Manures on Rice Yield and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Double-Cropping Rice Fields in the Pearl River Delta. Journal of Plant Nanjing University of Information Sciences & Technology (Natural Science Edition). Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1801.N.20210513.1257.002.html (accessed on 19 April 2021).
  22. Yang, D.; Ye, Z.H.; Xiao, X.; Yan, Y.; Liu, M.D.; Xie, G.X. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction and prganic fertilizer use on the greenhouse gas emissions of early rice fields. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 2018, 37, 2443–2450. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gao, H.J.; Zhang, W.J.; Peng, C.; Zhang, X.Z.; Li, Q.; Zhu, P. Emission characteristics of greenhouse gas from maize field of Black soil region under long-term fertilization. J. Agric. Resour. Environ. 2017, 34, 422–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bu, R.Y.; Li, M.; Han, S.; Cheng, W.L.; Wang, H.; Sun, Z.X.; Tang, S.; Wu, J. Comprenhensive effects of combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizer on yield, greenhouse gas emissions, and soil nutrient in double-cropping rice systems. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2021, 32, 145–153. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zheng, M.Q.; Liu, J.; Jiang, P.K.; Wu, J.S.; Li, Y.F.; Li, S.H. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer management on CH4 and N2O emissions in paddy field. Environ. Sci. 2022, 43, 2171–2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, Y.L.; Li, Y.; Bai, Y.J.; Huang, X.C.; Zhang, Y.R.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, W.A.; Jiang, T.M. Effect of long-term fertilization patterns on dry matter and phosphorus accumulation and translocation in rice. J. Plant Nutr. Fertil. 2019, 25, 1146–1156. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhang, Y.R.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.L.; Huang, X.C.; Zhang, W.A.; Jiang, T.M. Effect of long-term fertilization on carbon and nitrogen activity in Yellow soil in central Guizhou. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci. 2020, 33, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Huang, R.; Gao, M.; Li, J.C.; Xu, G.X.; LÜ, S.; Luo, M. Effect of straw residues in combination with reduced fertilization rate on greenhouse gas emissions from a vegetable field. Environ. Sci. 2018, 39, 4694–4704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dong, W.; Zhang, Q.; Luo, T.; Wang, H.P. Effects of continuous application of different organic fertilizers on soil quality. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2020, 36, 106–110. [Google Scholar]
  30. Haque, M.M.; Datta, J.; Ahmed, T.; Ehsanullah, M.; Karim, M.N.; Akter, M.S.; Iqbal, M.A.; Baazeem, A.; Hadifa, A.; Ahmed, S.; et al. Organic Amendments Boost Soil Fertility and Rice Productivity and Reduce Methane Emissions from Paddy Fields under Sub-Tropical Conditions. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xia, S.M. Relationship Between Root Morphology and Physiology of Rice and Methane Emission from Paddy Field. Master’s Thesis, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, G.H.; Zhou, J.X.; Zhang, J.F.; Yang, J.C. Decreasing net global warming potential through partial substitution of urea with manure and slow-release fertilizer in a double-rice system. J. Plant Nutr. Fertil. 2020, 26, 1017–1024. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wei, C.F.; Gao, M.; Huang, Q.; Che, F.C.; Yang, J.H. Effects of tillage-cropping systems on methane emissions from year-round flooded paddy field in southwest China. Acta Pedol. Sin. 2000, 37, 157–165. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang, C.; Lai, D.Y.F.; Sardans, J.; Wang, W.Q.; Zeng, C.S.; Peñuelas, J. Factors related with CH4 and N2O emissions from a paddy field: Clues for management implications. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e169254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Xu, X.Y. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Influencing Factors of Three Middle-Season Paddy Fields. Ph.D. Thesis, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan Hubei China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  36. Abagandura, G.O.; Bansal, S.; Karsteter, A.; Kumar, S. Soil greenhouse gas emissions, organic carbon and crop yield following pinewood biochar and biochar–manure applications at eroded and depositional landscape positions: A field trial in South Dakota, USA. Soil Use Manag. 2021, 38, 487–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khan, R.; Abbas, A.; Farooque, A.A.; Abbas, F.; Wang, X. Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agricultural Fields through Bioresource Management. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Githongo, M.W.; Musafiri, C.M.; Macharia, J.M.; Kiboi, M.N.; Fliessbach, A.; Ma, F.F.; Xing, S.L.; Gan, M.Q.; Liu, P.S.; Huang, Y.; et al. Effects of organic fertilizer substituting for chemical fertilizer on rice yield, soil fertility and nitrogen and phosphorus loss in farmland. Crops 2019, 36, 89–96. [Google Scholar]
  39. Muriuki, A.; Ngetich, F.K. Greenhouse Gas Fluxes from Selected Soil Fertility Management Practices in Humic Nitisols of Upper Eastern Kenya. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liang, Z.H.; Jin, X.; Zhai, P.F.; Zhao, Y.; Cai, J.W.; Li, S.P.; Yang, S.Y.; Li, C.Z.; Li, C.J. Combination of organic fertilizer and slow-release fertilizer increases pineapple yields, agronomic efficiency and reduces greenhouse gas emissions under reduced fertilization conditions in tropical areas. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 343, 131054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Dynamic changes in CH4 emission fluxes from rice fields with different treatments. Each point on the lines represents the mean of three replicates, and bars represent standard deviations of the means.
Figure 1. Dynamic changes in CH4 emission fluxes from rice fields with different treatments. Each point on the lines represents the mean of three replicates, and bars represent standard deviations of the means.
Sustainability 14 12574 g001
Figure 2. Dynamic changes in CO2 emission flux from rice fields under different treatments. Each point on different lines represents the mean of three replicates, and bars represent standard deviations of the means.
Figure 2. Dynamic changes in CO2 emission flux from rice fields under different treatments. Each point on different lines represents the mean of three replicates, and bars represent standard deviations of the means.
Sustainability 14 12574 g002
Figure 3. Dynamic changes in N2O emission flux from rice fields under different treatments. Each point on different lines represents the mean of three replicates, and bars represent standard deviations of the means.
Figure 3. Dynamic changes in N2O emission flux from rice fields under different treatments. Each point on different lines represents the mean of three replicates, and bars represent standard deviations of the means.
Sustainability 14 12574 g003
Table 1. Total N, P, and K nutrient application contents of different fertilization treatments.
Table 1. Total N, P, and K nutrient application contents of different fertilization treatments.
TreatmentsOrganic Fertilizer
t·hm−2
NP2O5K2O
kg·hm−2
NPK0.0165.082.582.5
1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK5.3165.082.582.5
1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK10.6165.082.582.5
M21.3165.023.9149.4
Table 2. Cumulative emissions of CH4 in different periods of fertilizer use (kg·hm−2).
Table 2. Cumulative emissions of CH4 in different periods of fertilizer use (kg·hm−2).
TreatmentSeedling Tillering Jointing and BootingHeading and FloweringGrain Filling Fallow Period
NPK0.83 ± 0.27 b5.85 ± 1.49 b11.63 ± 3.57 c14.68 ± 5.91 c14.66 ± 4.03 c−0.32 ± 0.39 ab
M2.49 ± 1.02 a25.54 ± 10.1 a57.16 ± 4.75 a71.78 ± 9.96 a60.46 ± 10.48 a−0.71 ± 0.17 b
1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK2.34 ± 1.16 ab14.65 ± 1.25 b28.25 ± 0.65 b43.74 ± 7.19 b32.26 ± 2.57 b0.01 ± 0.09 a
1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK1.18 ± 0.67 ab8.15 ± 3.64 b12.92 ± 4.81 c23.41 ± 5.58 c22.04 ± 7.97 bc−0.10 ± 0.10 a
Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Characteristics of cumulative CO2 emissions in different periods of fertilizer use (kg·hm−2).
Table 3. Characteristics of cumulative CO2 emissions in different periods of fertilizer use (kg·hm−2).
TreatmentSeedling Tillering Jointing and Booting Heading and Flowering Grain Filling Fallow Period
NPK155.37 ± 11.51 a1674.19 ± 356.62 ab4099.53 ± 780.71 ab4157.01 ± 568.48 b8102.6 ± 1689.03 b4370.40 ± 71.60 b
M175.67 ± 58.10 a1552.47 ± 121.54 ab4666.34 ± 232.12 a5959.72 ± 504.92 a12,153.74 ± 834.65 a5180.45 ± 362.07 a
1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK175.58 ± 42.80 a1409.30 ± 248.44 b3488.98 ± 329.49 b4427.75 ± 856.44 b7317.56 ± 501.88 b4580.19 ± 587.21 ab
1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK221.26 ± 38.23 a1869.02 ± 128.07 a4490.75 ± 458.28 a5936.88 ± 1039.4 a7972.58 ± 1109.28 b3961.52 ± 355.43 b
Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Characteristics of cumulative N2O emissions in different periods of fertilizer use (kg·hm−2).
Table 4. Characteristics of cumulative N2O emissions in different periods of fertilizer use (kg·hm−2).
TreatmentSeedlingTilleringJointing and BootingHeading and FloweringGrain FillingFallow Period
NPK0.015 ± 0.003 a0.014 ± 0.002 a0.018 ± 0.006 a−0.025 ± 0.009 ab0.106 ± 0.009 a0.664 ± 0.086 bc
M0.012 ± 0.003 a0.003 ± 0.002 c−0.020 ± 0.005 b−0.026 ± 0.016 ab0.003 ± 0.008 c0.566 ± 0.047 c
1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK0.007 ± 0.001 b0.008 ± 0.002 b−0.027 ± 0.015 b−0.012 ± 0.007 a0.059 ± 0.008 b0.809 ± 0.066 ab
1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK0.008 ± 0.001 b0.006 ± 0.005 bc−0.012 ± 0.004 b−0.035 ± 0.006 b0.100 ± 0.010 a0.853 ± 0.132 a
Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments (p < 0.05).
Table 5. Effects of different fertilization treatments and growth periods on greenhouse gas emission flux.
Table 5. Effects of different fertilization treatments and growth periods on greenhouse gas emission flux.
FactorsGreenhouse Gas Emission Flux
CH4CO2N2O
Treatment50.847 **3.661 *15.944 **
Growth period95.749 **90.420 **42.834 **
Treatment × Growth period11.641 **2.764 **4.368 **
Note: * significant correlation at the 5% level (bilateral), ** significant correlation at the 1% level.
Table 6. Changes in total greenhouse gas emissions and GWP under different treatments.
Table 6. Changes in total greenhouse gas emissions and GWP under different treatments.
TreatmentTotal Greenhouse Gas Emission (kg hm−2)GWP (kg CO2-e hm−2)
CH4CO2N2O
NPK47.34 ± 14.73 c22,559 ± 3044 b0.793 ± 0.092 a23,979 ± 2918 b
M216.71 ± 31.28 a29,688 ± 707 a0.538 ± 0.056 b35,266 ± 554 a
1/2 M + 1/2 N-PK121.25 ± 8.77 b21,399 ± 1914 b0.843 ± 0.061 a24,682 ± 2137 b
1/4 M + 3/4 N-PK67.60 ± 19.05 c24,452 ± 2818 b0.920 ± 0.124 a26,416 ± 2829 b
Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments (p < 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Nie, Y.; Liu, Y.; Huang, X.; Yang, Y.; Xiong, H.; Zhu, H.; Li, Y. Characteristics of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Yellow Paddy Soils under Long-Term Organic Fertilizer Application. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912574

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Nie Y, Liu Y, Huang X, Yang Y, Xiong H, Zhu H, Li Y. Characteristics of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Yellow Paddy Soils under Long-Term Organic Fertilizer Application. Sustainability. 2022; 14(19):12574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912574

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yarong, Yun Nie, Yanling Liu, Xingcheng Huang, Yehua Yang, Han Xiong, Huaqing Zhu, and Yu Li. 2022. "Characteristics of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Yellow Paddy Soils under Long-Term Organic Fertilizer Application" Sustainability 14, no. 19: 12574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912574

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop