Next Article in Journal
Fluctuations in Upper and Lower Body Movement during Walking in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus and Parkinson’s Disease Assessed by Motion Capture with a Smartphone Application, TDPT-GT
Previous Article in Journal
Efficient Underground Tunnel Place Recognition Algorithm Based on Farthest Point Subsampling and Dual-Attention Transformer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Susceptibility Analysis of Glacier Debris Flow Based on Remote Sensing Imagery and Deep Learning: A Case Study along the G318 Linzhi Section
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Machine Learning Modeling for Spatial-Temporal Prediction of Geohazard

1
Badong National Observation and Research Station of Geohazards, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
2
Three Gorges Research Center for Geohazards of the Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2023, 23(22), 9262; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23229262
Submission received: 19 October 2023 / Accepted: 10 November 2023 / Published: 18 November 2023

1. Introduction

Geohazards, such as landslides, rock avalanches, debris flow, ground fissures, and ground subsidence, pose significant threats to people’s lives and property [1]. Recently, machine learning (ML) has become the predominant approach in geohazard modeling [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13], offering advantages, like an excellent generalization ability and accurately describing complex and nonlinear behaviors. However, the utilization of advanced algorithms in deep learning remains poorly understood in this field [7,8]. Additionally, there are fundamental challenges associated with ML modeling, including input variable selection, uncertainty quantification, and hyperparameter tuning [3,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13].
This Special Issue presents original research exploring new frontiers and challenges in applying ML for the spatial-temporal modeling of geohazards. The topics covered include geohazard modeling, spatial-temporal prediction, ML, deep and reinforcement learning, the metaheuristic optimized ML approach, and physics-based and data-driven hybrid modeling.

2. Overview of Contribution

This Special Issue titled “Machine Learning Modeling for Spatial-Temporal Prediction of Geohazard” comprises eleven high-quality papers, including one systematic review article and ten original research articles conducted by researchers from Canada, China, Iran, Malaysia, Pakistan, and Sweden. These ten research articles can be categorized as follows: the susceptibility analysis of glacier debris flow and landslides (contributions 1–3), the displacement prediction of reservoir landslides (contributions 4–6), slope stability prediction and classification (contributions 7–8), building resilience evaluation (contribution 9), and the prediction of rainfall-induced landslide warning signals (contribution 10). Modern ML techniques, including metaheuristic optimized ML, deep learning, and automated ML, have been applied to the spatial-temporal modeling of geohazards in various regions, such as Kurdistan in Iran, Karakorum Highway in Pakistan, and Chongqing, G318 Linzhi Section, and the Three Gorges Reservoir area in China.
Geohazard susceptibility mapping is the central theme of this Special Issue (contributions 1–3). For instance, the susceptibility mapping of glacier debris flows along the G318 Linzhi Section in China was generated using remote sensing imagery and a convolutional-neural-network-based image segmentation model, DeepLabv3+ (contribution 1). In the context of landslide susceptibility mapping, a deep learning model that combines extreme machine learning, a deep belief network, back propagation, and a genetic algorithm has been proposed and validated in Kamyaran in the Kurdistan Province, Iran (contribution 2). The proposed deep learning models achieved satisfactory performances, with values exceeding 0.90 (contributions 1 and 2), underscoring the effectiveness of deep learning in geohazard susceptibility mapping. In the research conducted by Hussain et al. (contribution 3), landslide susceptibility mapping was compared using random forest, extreme gradient boosting, k-nearest neighbor, and naive Bayes in a case study along Karakorum Highway in Northern Pakistan.
Another significant focus of this Special Issue is the prediction of reservoir landslide displacements. Due to seasonal rainfall and periodic reservoir fluctuations, the deformations of reservoir landslide are characterized by a step-like behavior. Innovative approaches based on the decomposition and ensemble principle have been introduced to predict displacements in the cases of the Shiliushubao (contribution 4), Baijiabao (contribution 5), and Baishuihe landslides (contribution 6). These approaches incorporate mode decomposition, input variable selection, individual prediction, and ensemble prediction to achieve a satisfactory performance, nearly optimizing the goodness of fit. Decomposition techniques, such as complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition (contributions 4 and 5) and variational mode decomposition (contribution 6), are utilized to break down cumulative displacement into trend, periodic, and random components. Methods like edit distance for real sequence (contribution 4), gray relational analysis, and association rule mining (contribution 6) have been proposed for the selection of input variables. For individual prediction, various methods, including metaheuristic optimized support vector regression (contribution 4), back propagation neural networks (contribution 6), and gated recurrent unit deep learning (contribution 5), are employed to predict the decomposed displacements, which are then aggregated into a final ensemble prediction. In particular, Zhang et al. (contribution 4) evaluate the performance of hyperparameter tuning using metaheuristic techniques, such as the bat algorithm, grey wolf optimization, dragonfly algorithm, whale optimization algorithm, grasshopper optimization algorithm, and sparrow search algorithm. The abovementioned works (contributions 4–6) contribute significantly to the field of model decomposition, input variable selection, and hyperparameter tuning.
Slope stability prediction and classification (contributions 7 and 8) represent another prominent theme in this Special Issue. Wu et al. (contribution 7) developed a stability prediction model for slope with predetermined shear planes with Box–Jenkins’ modeling approach using a mechanical-informed dataset. For the first time, an automated ML model for slope stability classification has been developed with minimal human intervention by Ma et al. (contribution 8). The AuotML model provides an attractive alternative to traditional ML practice, especially for early-stage researchers with limited expertise in ML.
In the work by Zhang et al. (contribution 9), an ML-based model for assessing the resilience of buildings was developed and evaluated in Banan District, a typical mountainous city in Chongqing, China. Furthermore, Zhang et al. (contribution 10) proposed a hybrid model that combines an attention-based temporal convolutional neural network with entropy weight methods for predicting rainfall-induced landslide warning signals.
Additionally, in a review article entitled “Scientometric Analysis of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Geohazard Research”, Jiang et al. (contribution 11) conducted a scientometric review of artificial intelligence for geohazard research based on thousands of records from the Web of Science core collection. This analysis identified and visualized the most productive researchers, institutions, and emerging research topics using animated maps, and it also provided recommendations for future directions. This scientometric review holds promise in offering a comprehensive and objective overview of publication characteristics and emerging trends for researchers in the field.

3. Conclusions

This Special Issue provides a forum for presenting original research that delves into novel frontiers and confronts challenges in utilizing ML for geohazard susceptibility mapping, geohazard prediction, slope stability prediction, building resilience evaluation, and landslide early warning systems. Within these domains, advanced ML techniques, including deep learning, metaheuristic optimized ML, ensemble learning, and AutoML, have been introduced. We anticipate that these innovative techniques and approaches will be valuable contributions that are warmly received by both researchers and practitioners in the field.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 42177147 and 71874165), the Key Research and Development Project of Hubei Provincial Technology Innovation Plan (No. 2023BCB117), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) (CUG2642022006).

Acknowledgments

The Guest Editors express their sincere gratitude to all the authors, as well as MDPI and the Managing Editor for their invaluable advice and support for this Sensors Special Issue “Machine Learning Modeling for Spatial-Temporal Prediction of Geohazard”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Chen, J.; Gao, H.; Han, L.; Yu, R.; Mei, G. Susceptibility Analysis of Glacier Debris Flow Based on Remote Sensing Imagery and Deep Learning: A Case Study along the G318 Linzhi Section. Sensors 2023, 23, 6608. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23146608.
  • Ghasemian, B.; Shahabi, H.; Shirzadi, A.; Al-Ansari, N.; Jaafari, A.; Kress, V.R.; Geertsema, M.; Renoud, S.; Ahmad, A. A Robust Deep-Learning Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Kurdistan Province, Iran. Sensors 2022, 22, 1573. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041573.
  • Hussain, M.A.; Chen, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Shoaib, M.; Shah, S.U.; Ali, N.; Afzal, Z. Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning Algorithm Validated by Persistent Scatterer In-SAR Technique. Sensors 2022, 22, 3119. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093119.
  • Zhang, J.; Tang, H.; Tannant, D.D.; Lin, C.; Xia, D.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Q. A Novel Model for Landslide Displacement Prediction Based on EDR Selection and Multi-Swarm Intelligence Optimization Algorithm. Sensors 2021, 21, 8352. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21248352.
  • Yang, B.; Xiao, T.; Wang, L.; Huang, W. Using Complementary Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition and Gated Recurrent Unit to Predict Landslide Displacements in Dam Reservoir. Sensors 2022, 22, 1320. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041320.
  • Miao, F.; Xie, X.; Wu, Y.; Zhao, F. Data Mining and Deep Learning for Predicting the Displacement of “Step-like” Landslides. Sensors 2022, 22, 481. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22020481.
  • Wu, T.; Yu, H.; Jiang, N.; Zhou, C.; Luo, X. Slope with Predetermined Shear Plane Stability Predictions under Cyclic Loading with Innovative Time Series Analysis by Mechanical Learning Approach. Sensors 2022, 22, 2647. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22072647.
  • Ma, J.; Jiang, S.; Liu, Z.; Ren, Z.; Lei, D.; Tan, C.; Guo, H. Machine Learning Models for Slope Stability Classification of Circular Mode Failure: An Updated Database and Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) Approach. Sensors 2022, 22, 9166. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22239166.
  • Zhang, C.; Wen, H.; Liao, M.; Lin, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, H. Study on Machine Learning Models for Building Resilience Evaluation in Mountainous Area: A Case Study of Banan District, Chongqing, China. Sensors 2022, 22, 1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22031163.
  • Zhang, D.; Wei, K.; Yao, Y.; Yang, J.; Zheng, G.; Li, Q. Capture and Prediction of Rainfall-Induced Landslide Warning Signals Using an Attention-Based Temporal Convolutional Neural Network and Entropy Weight Methods. Sensors 2022, 22, 6240. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22166240.
  • Jiang, S.; Ma, J.; Liu, Z.; Guo, H. Scientometric Analysis of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Geohazard Research. Sensors 2022, 22, 7814. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22207814.

References

  1. Ma, J.W.; Xia, D.; Wang, Y.K.; Niu, X.X.; Jiang, S.; Liu, Z.Y.; Guo, H.X. A Comprehensive Comparison among Metaheuristics (MHs) for Geohazard Modeling using Machine Learning: Insights from A Case Study of Landslide Displacement Prediction. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2022, 114, 105150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dou, J.; Xiang, Z.; Xu, Q.; Zheng, P.; Wang, X.; Su, A.; Liu, J.; Luo, W. Application and development trend of machine learning in landslide intelligent disaster prevention and mitigation. Earth Sci. 2023, 48, 1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jiang, S.; Ma, J.; Liu, Z.; Guo, H. Scientometric analysis of artificial intelligence (AI) for geohazard research. Sensors 2022, 22, 7814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, W.; Pradhan, B.; Stuyts, B.; Xu, C. Application of artificial intelligence in geotechnical and geohazard investigations. Geol. J. 2023, 58, 2187–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dikshit, A.; Pradhan, B.; Alamri, A.M. Pathways and challenges of the application of artificial intelligence to geohazards modelling. Gondwana Res. 2021, 100, 290–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Phoon, K.-K.; Zhang, W. Future of machine learning in geotechnics. Georisk Assess. Manag. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards 2022, 17, 7–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ma, Z.J.; Mei, G. Deep learning for geological hazards analysis: Data, models, applications, and opportunities. Earth Sci. Rev. 2021, 223, 103858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, W.; Gu, X.; Tang, L.; Yin, Y.; Liu, D.; Zhang, Y. Application of machine learning, deep learning and optimization algorithms in geoengineering and geoscience: Comprehensive review and future challenge. Gondwana Res. 2022, 109, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ma, Z.J.; Mei, G.; Piccialli, F. Machine learning for landslides prevention: A survey. Neural Comput. Appl. 2020, 33, 10881–10907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bergen, K.J.; Johnson, P.A.; de Hoop, M.V.; Beroza, G.C. Machine learning for data-driven discovery in solid Earth geoscience. Science 2019, 363, eaau0323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Pu, Y.; Apel, D.B.; Liu, V.; Mitri, H. Machine learning methods for rockburst prediction-state-of-the-art review. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2019, 29, 565–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dramsch, J.S. Chapter One—70 years of machine learning in geoscience in review. In Advances in Geophysics; Moseley, B., Krischer, L., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; Volume 61, pp. 1–55. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sun, Z.; Sandoval, L.; Crystal-Ornelas, R.; Mousavi, S.M.; Wang, J.; Lin, C.; Cristea, N.; Tong, D.; Carande, W.H.; Ma, X.; et al. A review of Earth Artificial Intelligence. Comput. Geosci. 2022, 159, 105034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, J.; Dou, J. Machine Learning Modeling for Spatial-Temporal Prediction of Geohazard. Sensors 2023, 23, 9262. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23229262

AMA Style

Ma J, Dou J. Machine Learning Modeling for Spatial-Temporal Prediction of Geohazard. Sensors. 2023; 23(22):9262. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23229262

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Junwei, and Jie Dou. 2023. "Machine Learning Modeling for Spatial-Temporal Prediction of Geohazard" Sensors 23, no. 22: 9262. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23229262

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop