Next Article in Journal
Recent Developments in Peptidyl Diaryl Phoshonates as Inhibitors and Activity-Based Probes for Serine Proteases
Previous Article in Journal
Developments in Carbohydrate-Based Cancer Therapeutics
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceuticals
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/ph12020085
pharmaceuticals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

1,2-Dihydroxyxanthone: Effect on A375-C5 Melanoma Cell Growth Associated with Interference with THP-1 Human Macrophage Activity

by
Viviana Silva
1,
Fátima Cerqueira
2,
Nair Nazareth
3,
Rui Medeiros
2,4,5,
Amélia Sarmento
2,6,7,
Emília Sousa
8,9,* and
Madalena Pinto
8,9,*
1
ICBAS, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Rua Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
2
FP-ENAS Research Unit, UFP Energy, Environment and Health Research Unit, CEBIMED, Biomedical Research Center, Fernando Pessoa University, Praça 9 de Abril, 349, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal
3
LAQV/REQUIMTE, Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, Rua Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
4
Molecular Oncology and Viral Pathology GRP - IC, Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto (IPO Porto), Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
5
LPCC, Research Department - Portuguese League Against Cancer (LPPC - NRN), Estrada Interior da Circunvalação, 6657, 4200-172 Porto, Portugal
6
i3S, Institute for Research and Innovation in Health, University of Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen, 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
7
IBMC, Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen, 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
8
CIIMAR/CIMAR, Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, Av. General Norton de Matos s/n, 4450-208 Matosinhos, Portugal
9
Laboratory of Organic and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Department of Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, Rua Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2019, 12(2), 85; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph12020085
Submission received: 30 April 2019 / Revised: 1 June 2019 / Accepted: 3 June 2019 / Published: 4 June 2019
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Xanthones have been suggested as prospective candidates for cancer treatment. 1,2- dihydroxyxanthone (1,2-DHX) is known to interfere with the growth of several cancer cell lines. We investigated the effects of 1,2-DHX on the growth of the A375-C5 melanoma cell line and THP-1 human macrophage activity. 1,2-DHX showed a moderate growth inhibition of A375-C5 melanoma cells (concentration that causes a 50% inhibition of cell growth (GI50) = 55.0 ± 2.3 µM), but strongly interfered with THP-1 human macrophage activity. Supernatants from lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated THP-1 macrophage cultures exposed to 1,2-DHX significantly increased growth inhibition of A375-C5 cells, when compared to supernatants from untreated LPS-stimulated macrophages or to direct treatment with 1,2-DHX only. 1,2-DHX decreased THP-1 secretion of interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and interleukin-10 (IL-10), but stimulated tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) production. This xanthone also inhibited nitric oxide (NO) production by RAW 264.7 murine macrophages, possibly through inhibition of inducible NO synthase production. In conclusion, these findings suggest a potential impact of 1,2-DHX in melanoma treatment, not only due to a direct effect on cancer cells but also by modulation of macrophage activity.

1. Introduction

Melanomas originate from melanocytic cells and are a result of multistep tumorigenesis [1]. Growing evidence suggests that the involvement of the immune system in the tumorigenic process is an important factor for malignancy progression [1,2]. Thus, investigation has focused on therapies directed at immune targets, resulting in the main approved therapeutic agent for melanoma used nowadays, ipilimumab (human monoclonal antibody (IgG1k) against the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4)) [3,4,5]. Nevertheless, the efficacies of both standard and alternative actual therapies are, in some cases, time-limited due to resistance mechanisms and, in other cases, associated with severe side effects [4,6,7]. Indeed, there is still a need to find more efficient and safe alternative treatments, preferably targeting multiple pathways, in order to prevent refractory tumors and consequently avoid the massive mortality rate associated with melanomas [5,8,9].
Investigation concerning xanthonic compounds has been rising, mostly due to their remarkable characteristics as potential drugs [10,11,12,13]. Xanthones from natural origins are, in fact, very promising compounds, but are limited in the positions or types of substituents in the xanthone scaffold due to the natural biosynthetic pathways [14,15]. The synthesis of new xanthones is important to enlarge the chemical diversity of these compounds and increase the possibility of finding new biological activities [11,16,17,18,19]. In a study with the human melanoma cell line UACC-62, although the unsubstituted xanthones had no cytotoxic effects on the cancerous cells, the presence of oxygenated substituents produced a growth inhibitory effect that was particularly promising for 1,2-dihydroxyxanthone (1,2-DHX) (Figure 1), which also showed some selectivity for melanoma cells when compared to MCF-7 (human breast cancer cell line) and TK-10 (human renal cancer cell line) cells. 1,2-DHX also showed a growth inhibitory effect on T-lymphocyte proliferation [15,20]. Moreover, this derivative was identified as a hit antioxidant compound, characterized by its chelating properties and its effects on a human keratinocyte cell line [21]. In another study by our group of researchers, chiral derivatives of xanthones also exhibited dose-dependent inhibitory effects on A375-C5 human melanoma cell lines [14]. Thus, xanthones are being described as interfering with the immune system, namely at the levels of proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), cytokine production, or macrophage activity [15,22,23,24,25]. However, to the best of our knowledge, 1,2-DHX interference with macrophage activity has never been evaluated.
Macrophages are dynamic and heterogeneous cells, mainly due to their capacity to respond to stimuli. According to the microenvironment, they may be polarized into a spectrum of phenotypes, ranging from the pro-inflammatory M1 (classic) to the immunossupressive M2 (alternative) [26,27]. Several lines of evidence indicate that macrophage phenotypes can change during tumor progression [28,29,30]. M1 activation may induce chronic inflammation which can promote mutagenesis, cell proliferation and, consequently, predispose cells to tumor initiation [31,32]. In the early stages of tumor progression, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) adopt an M1-like phenotype that contributes to tumor immunity [33]. The M2 phenotype is mainly expressed in established tumors and induces immunosuppressive, angiogenic, and metastatic effects [30,34,35,36,37]. TAMs are important in melanoma therapies, not only because they are the most abundant immune cells present in the tumor but also because melanocytic tumors are described as highly immunogenic [28,38,39,40,41,42,43,44].
This work evaluated the activity of 1,2-DHX on the growth of the A375-C5 melanoma epithelial cell line and also its modulatory effects on the activity of the THP-1 macrophage cell line, namely cytokine production. The effects on the production of nitric oxide by the murine macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 were also investigated.

2. Results

2.1. 1,2-DHX and Supernatants from 1,2-DHX-Treated Macrophage Cultures Inhibited A375-C5 Growth

Incubation with 1,2-dihydroxyxanthone (1,2-DHX) resulted in a moderate inhibitory effect on A375-C5 melanoma cell growth (Table 1).
The potential influence of 1,2-DHX-conditioned macrophage supernatants on A375-C5 cell growth was also investigated. The addition of supernatants obtained from THP-1 macrophages stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to melanoma cell cultures resulted in growth inhibition comparable to that obtained by adding 1,2-DHX at a concentration of 50 μM (31.6 ± 4.9% and 25.3 ± 1.8%, respectively). However, the addition of supernatants from LPS-stimulated macrophages treated with 1,2-DHX to melanoma cells resulted in a significantly higher (p < 0.05) inhibitory effect on melanoma cell growth (52.4 ± 4.3%) than the addition of culture supernatants from macrophages stimulated with LPS only or the direct addition of xanthone at 50 μM, as demonstrated in Figure 2. The viability of THP-1 cells stimulated with LPS was determined, and was always ≥90% when compared to untreated LPS-stimulated control cells.

2.2. 1,2-DHX Modulated Cytokine Production by Macrophages

Further experiments were carried out to determine whether 1,2-DHX affected cytokine production by macrophages. Two concentrations of the compound (50 and 100 µM) were studied to evaluate the effects of this xanthone on cytokine production by an LPS-stimulated THP-1 macrophage cell line. The expressions of four cytokines were evaluated: Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (associated with M1 phenotype), and interleukin-10 (IL-10) and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) (associated with M2 phenotype).
1,2-DHX significantly inhibited the expression of IL-1β and stimulated the expression of TNF-α at both concentrations (Figure 3). At the maximum concentration tested, 1,2-DHX significantly stimulated the expression of TGF-β1 and suppressed IL-10 production.

2.3. 1,2-DHX Inhibited NO Production by Macrophages

Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) mRNA expression was detected in RAW 264.7 murine macrophages stimulated with LPS, 2–4 h after stimulation, reaching the maximum at the time point of 6 h [45,46,47]. iNOS protein was detectable after 4–6 h of LPS stimulation in RAW 264.7 macrophages [45,46,47]. To determine whether the inhibitory effects were due to decreased enzyme synthesis or decreased enzyme activity, 1,2-DHX was added to RAW 264.7 at three different time points: Simultaneously with LPS, or 6 or 14 h after macrophage stimulation by LPS. In all cases, NO production was determined after a total incubation period of 24 h.
To evaluate the effects of 1,2-DHX on NO production by the RAW 264.7 murine macrophage cell line, serial 1:2 dilutions were tested, and one concentration was selected in order to obtain an inhibition near 50% of NO production. The same procedure was used for N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) and dexamethasone, as positive controls. The concentrations selected were 25 μM for 1,2-DHX, 62.5 μM for L-NAME, and 6.25 μM for dexamethasone.
When 1,2-DHX was added simultaneously with the stimulus, 56.6 ± 1.8% of NO production was inhibited. When the compound was added 6 h after stimulation, the inhibitory effect significantly decreased to 25.0 ± 2.8% (p < 0.001), and a lack of inhibitory effect was observed when the compound was added 14 h after stimulation (Table 2).
Toxicity was excluded by performing the thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT) viability assay, since cells showed viabilities higher than 90% at the dilution closest to IC50 of 1,2-DHX. 1,2-DHX did not show any scavenging activity of NO generated in a cell-free system.

3. Discussion

The anticancer and immunomodulatory effects of natural and synthetic xanthones have been extensively reported in the literature [10,13,24,48,49,50,51,52], including those of 1,2-DHX [15,20]. Despite these insights, as far as we know, no studies have yet been undertaken to clarify the effects of 1,2-DHX on macrophages, which may have an impact on melanoma cell growth.
In the present study, the effects of 1,2-DHX addition to cultures of the A375-C5 melanoma cell line were evaluated. We found that 1,2-DHX is a weaker inhibitor of A375-C5 cell growth (GI50 = 55.4 ± 2.0 µM) than of UACC-62 cell growth (GI50 = 14.0 ± 0.3 µM), another melanoma cell line [15]. This discrepancy may possibly be explained by the difference in cell type, since A375-C5 is of epithelial origin while UACC-62 is not.
Melanomas are classified as highly immunogenic tumors [1]. It was thus important to evaluate whether the anticancer activity of 1,2-DHX occurs through immune system involvement. We demonstrated that supernatants from THP-1 macrophages incubated with both LPS and 1,2-DHX strongly inhibited the growth of A375-C5 melanoma cells, when compared to the supernatants of THP-1 macrophages treated with LPS only. The mechanism underlying this effect is still unknown and deserves future evaluation.
Since cytokines produced by macrophages may play important roles in tumor growth or regression in vivo, we next evaluated the effects of 1,2-DHX treatment on cytokine production by THP-1 macrophages stimulated with LPS, which could account for the inhibition of A375-C5 growth induced by culture supernatants. We evaluated the productions of two cytokines associated with the M1 phenotype (IL-1β and TNF- α) and two others associated to the M2 phenotype (TGF-β1 and IL-10) [33]. Although cytokine production is time- and cell-dependent [53], cytokine secretion was quantified 24 h after LPS stimulation, since NO production was also assessed at that time point.
TNF-α levels were similar in LPS-stimulated and non-stimulated THP-1 cells, which is in accordance with the literature [53]. 1,2-DHX increased the levels of TNF-α and TGF-β1 detection in supernatants from LPS-stimulated THP-1 macrophages, while the detected levels of IL-1β and IL-10 were lower after xanthone exposure. The stimulatory effect of 1,2-DHX on TNF-α production predicts a favorable outcome in melanoma treatment, since several reports have associated the use of TNF inhibitors with an increased risk of developing skin cancer, including melanoma [54,55]. However, this idea is not corroborated by recent studies [56,57]. The A375 melanoma cell line expresses low levels of TNF-α, and this cytokine, derived from myeloid cells, was described as fundamental for melanoma growth in vitro [57].
IL-1β, a pro-inflammatory cytokine mainly produced by monocytes and macrophages, is an example of immune system pleiotropism. In melanoma, its expression was associated to tumor progression and promotion of lung metastases from melanomas [58,59]. Thus, IL-1β has been associated with all steps of malignancy (carcinogenesis, progression, invasion, and metastasis) and may even be expressed by the tumor cells [60]. In contrast, it was also found to induce an immune response against malignant cells associated to the M1 macrophage phenotype [61]. However, the A375-C5 cell line is resistant to the effects of IL-1α [62,63,64].
IL-10 and TGF-β1 are anti-inflammatory cytokines involved in the carcinogenesis process. In melanomas, IL-10 was associated with metastatic formation [65,66], and TGF-β is highly expressed and increases in parallel with tumor progression [67,68]. The treatment of LPS-stimulated macrophages with 1,2-DHX might be expected to affect the expressions of the cytokines selected to represent the M1 (IL-1β and TNF-α) and M2 (TGF-β1 and IL-10) macrophage profiles in a similar way. Nevertheless, the results showed that the detected levels of some M1 and M2 characteristic cytokine expressions increased (TNF-α and TGF-β1, respectively), and others decreased (IL-1β and IL-10, respectively).
Taking these findings together, the 1,2-DHX-dependent increase in TNF-α and decrease in IL-10 detection may contribute to tumor regression, although the TGF-β1 increase seems to contradict the xanthone antitumor effects. However, neither IL-10 nor TGF-β1 were probably involved in the antitumor effects of the 1,2-DHX-conditioned THP-1 culture supernatant, since at the xanthone dose used (50 µM), no significant changes were observed for IL-10 or TGF-β1 levels. In conclusion, the isolated analysis of the alterations on cytokine levels seems to be insufficient to explain the antitumor effects observed for 1,2-DHX-conditioned LPS-stimulated THP-1 supernatants, suggesting a multifactorial interference responsible for the aforementioned results. This is in agreement with other studies, in which the effects of macrophage-derived factors in tumor growth, namely melanomas, are the result of interactions of factors with tumor-promoter and tumor-inhibitory activities [57].
The role of nitric oxide (NO) produced by macrophages in tumors is controversial. It was reported that below a critical concentration, NO causes DNA mutations [69], inhibits apoptosis [70], promotes angiogenesis [71], limits immune responses against cancer [72], and promotes metastasis [73]. However, when it exceeds the critical concentration, NO induces apoptosis and suppresses the growth of the tumor [74], and is reported as being cytotoxic in melanomas and many other tumors [74,75]. With the purpose of evaluating the effects of 1,2-DHX on NO production, xanthone was added at different time points: 0 (simultaneously with LPS), 6, and 14 h after RAW 264.7 macrophage stimulation with LPS. 1,2-DHX is a potent inhibitor of NO production by LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 murine macrophage cells, and this effect was not due to cell death or to NO scavenging. However, when 1,2-DHX is added 6 h after stimulation, the inhibitory effect decreased significantly (p < 0.001), and when added after 14 h, no inhibition was detected. These findings suggest that the inhibitory effect of 1,2-DHX on NO production may depend on inhibition of iNOS expression, since at 6 h after LPS stimulation, iNOS expression has already occurred. L-NAME (an inhibitor of iNOS activity) and dexamethasone (an inhibitor of iNOS expression) were used as positive controls of inhibition [76,77]. 1,2-DHX showed comparable results to dexamethasone, which is in favor of an inhibitory effect of xanthone on iNOS expression.
The inhibition of iNOS expression indicates that 1,2-DHX has anti-inflammatory properties. Inhibition of iNOS expression may be related to the increase of TGF-β1 concentration. This cytokine has been reported as a destabilizer of iNOS mRNA, avoiding gene translation and inhibiting NO production. The NF-κB pathway may also be involved, since it contributes to iNOS synthesis and upregulation of IL-1β levels. 1,2-DHX-treated LPS-stimulated macrophages expressed lower IL-1β and NO levels compared to untreated LPS-stimulated macrophages (THP-1 and RAW 264.7, respectively). These findings lead us to hypothesize the interference of the NF-κB pathway by xanthone. More studies must be performed to corroborate this possibility and elucidate the mechanism of macrophage modulation responsible for the antitumor effect.
In conclusion, 1,2-DHX may be a promising compound for melanoma treatment, due to its direct inhibition of melanoma cell growth and modulation of macrophage activity. The lack of appropriate current therapeutic alternatives to fight against melanomas makes the studies on new compounds highly needed and emphasizes the importance of these results. Since the immune response is crucial for tumor regression or growth, further studies are required to clarify the mechanisms underlying the effects of 1,2-DHX on macrophages and to evaluate effects on other immune system cells.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Xanthone

1,2-DHX was previously synthetized by our group of researchers [16]. A stock solution was prepared in DMSO (Applichem, Darmstadt, Germany) and, before each assay, diluted in the appropriate complete culture medium.

4.2. Cell Lines

The THP-1 human monocyte cell line, the A375-C5 human malignant melanoma cell line, and the RAW 264.7 mouse macrophage cell line were a courtesy of Rui Appelberg (Immunobiology Group, IBMC, Porto, Portugal), Helena Vasconcelos, and Maria de São José Nascimento (Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Porto, Portugal), respectively. A375-C5 was routinely maintained in 25 cm2 culture flasks containing Roswell Park Memorial Institute-1640 (RPMI-1640) medium with glutamax (Gibco, Paisley, UK), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Paisley, UK) and 50 µg mL−1 gentamycin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. For the THP-1 cell line, the culture medium just described was also supplemented with 0.05 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The RAW 264.7 cell line was maintained in 75 cm2 flasks containing Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) with glutamax (Gibco, Paisley, UK), with 10% FBS and 50 µg mL−1 gentamycin, in the same conditions.

4.3. Sulphorodamine B (SRB) Growth Inhibition Assay

The effects of 1,2-DHX on the growth of the A375-C5 human melanoma cell line (7.5 × 104 cells mL−1) were evaluated according to the method adopted by the National Cancer Institute (NCI, Oxford, MS, USA) [78] as already described by our group [16,79]. Doxorubicin (1:10 dilutions; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as a positive control [16,79]. Results were expressed as the concentration that causes a 50% inhibition of cell growth (GI50) when compared to the control.

4.4. Antitumor Effect of Conditioned Macrophage Culture Medium

The antitumor effect of 1,2-DHX-conditioned macrophage culture medium on the A375-C5 cell line was evaluated according to [80]. Briefly, the THP-1 cell line was plated at 1 × 105 cells mL−1 and differentiated into THP-1 macrophages with 10 ng mL−1 phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 72 h [80]. Once differentiated, cells were washed twice with complete medium and left for another 24 h incubation in order to achieve a resting state [81,82]. Then, they were stimulated with 100 µL of LPS solution (1 µg mL−1; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO USA) and treated, or not, with 100 µL of 1,2-DHX solution. Cells were further incubated for 24 h at 37° C, 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator [80]. Plates were centrifuged, and half of the volume of each well was transferred to A375-C5 adherent cell monolayers, previously plated as for the cancer growth inhibition assay procedure. After 48 h incubation, an SRB assay was performed, and absorbance was measured and the percentage of cell-growth inhibition determined as compared to the control cells [16].

4.5. Cytokine Quantification

Culture supernatants of differentiated THP-1 cells, unstimulated and LPS-stimulated, treated or not, and with 1,2-DHX as previously described, were stored at −20 °C until cytokine analyses. Levels of IL-1β, IL-10, TNF-α, and TGFβ1 in culture supernatants were quantified by ELISA Ready-Set-Go Kits (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturers’ instructions.

4.6. NO Production Assays

NO production by RAW 264.7 cells (1 × 106 cells mL−1) after LPS stimulation (1.5 µg mL−1) was quantified by Griess assay, as previously described by our group [24,82]. The inhibition of NO production was determined in terms of percentage, in relation to the NO produced by the LPS-stimulated control cells (100% production). L-NAME and dexamethasone (both from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used as positive controls.

4.7. NO Scavenging Assays

To assess NO scavenging effects by xanthone, nitrite was chemically generated using sodium nitroprusside (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and quantified by Griess assay as previously described [25,83].

4.8. MTT-Viability Assay

The effects of 1,2-DHX on THP-1 and RAW 264.7 cell viability were evaluated by the MTT (thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide) viability assay [16,25,84].

4.9. Statistical Analysis

Except otherwise stated, results are the mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments, performed in duplicate. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS for Windows (version 20.0). Statistical significance between groups was calculated by the Mann–Whitney Test, and it is considered for p values less than 0.05.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.C., R.M., E.M., and M.P.; writing—original draft preparation, V.S.; writing—review and editing, V.S., F.C., A.S., E.S. R.M., and M.P; project administration, M.P.; funding acquisition, M.P.; chemistry, E.S., and M.P.; master degree student, V.S., scientific supervisor, R.M., and scientific co-supervisors, F.C. and M.P.; optimization of laboratory procedures, F.C. and V.S.; laboratorial work, V.S.; statistical analysis, R.M. and V.S.; technical advisory in cytokine quantification, A.S. and N.N.; laboratorial work/analysis of results on cytokine expression, N.N. and V.S.; all authors read and approved the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partially supported through national funds provided by FCT/MCTES—Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P., from the Minister of Science, Technology, and Higher Education (PIDDAC) and European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the COMPETE—Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade (POFC) programme, under the Strategic Funding UID/Multi/04423/2013, UID/Multi/04423/2019, UID/Multi/04546/2013, and UID/Multi/04546/2019, the project PTDC/MAR-BIO/4694/2014 (reference POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016790; Project 3599—Promover a Produção Científica e Desenvolvimento Tecnológico e a Constituição de Redes Temáticas (3599-PPCDT)) in the framework of the programme PT2020.

Acknowledgments

To Fátima Silva for the kind review of the English language.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hussein, M.R. Genetic pathways to melanoma tumorigenesis. J. Clin. Pathol. 2004, 57, 797–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, H.; Yang, L.; Wang, D.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, L. Pro-tumor activities of macrophages in the progression of melanoma. Hum. Vaccin Immunother. 2017, 13, 1556–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dranoff, G. Targets of protective tumor immunity. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2009, 1174, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hodi, F.S.; O’day, S.J.; McDermott, D.F.; Weber, R.W.; Sosman, J.A.; Haanen, J.B.; Gonzalez, R.; Robert, C.; Schadendorf, D.; Hassel, J.C.; et al. Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 711–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Raaijmakers, M.I.; Rozati, S.; Goldinger, S.M.; Widmer, D.S.; Dummer, R.; Levesque, M.P. Melanoma immunotherapy: Historical precedents, recent successes and future prospects. Immunotherapy 2013, 5, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Graziani, G.; Tentori, L.; Navarra, P. Ipilimumab: A novel immunostimulatory monoclonal antibody for the treatment of cancer. Pharmacol. Res. 2012, 65, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Solit, D.B.; Rosen, N. Resistance to BRAF Inhibition in Melanomas. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 364, 772–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gast, A.; Bermejo, J.L.; Claus, R.; Brandt, A.; Weires, M.; Weber, A.; Plass, C.; Sucker, A.; Hemminki, K.; Schadendorf, D.; et al. Association of inherited variation in Toll-like receptor genes with malignant melanoma susceptibility and survival. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e24370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kuphal, S.; Bosserhoff, A. Recent progress in understanding the pathology of malignant melanoma. J. Pathol. 2009, 219, 400–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Barbosa, J.; Lima, R.T.; Sousa, D.; Gomes, A.S.; Palmeira, A.; Seca, H.; Choosang, K.; Pakkong, P.; Bousbaa, H.; Pinto, M.M.; et al. Screening a Small Library of Xanthones for Antitumor Activity and Identification of a Hit Compound which Induces Apoptosis. Molecules 2016, 21, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Genovese, S.; Fiorito, S.; Taddeo, V.; Epifano, F. Recent developments in the pharmacology of prenylated xanthones. Drug Discov. Today 2016, 21, 1814–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pinto, M.; Castanheiro, R. Natural Prenylated Xanthones: Chemistry and Biological Activities. In Natural Products: Chemistry, Biochemistry and Pharmacology; Brahmachari, G., Ed.; Alpha Science International: Oxford, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  13. Pinto, M.M.; Sousa, M.E.; Nascimento, M.S. Xanthone derivatives: New insights in biological activities. Curr. Med. Chem. 2005, 12, 2517–2538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fernandes, C.; Masawang, K.; Tiritan, M.E.; Sousa, E.; de Lima, V.; Afonso, C.; Bousbaa, H.; Sudprasert, W.; Pedro, M.; Pinto, M.M. New chiral derivatives of xanthones: Synthesis and investigation of enantioselectivity as inhibitors of growth of human tumor cell lines. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014, 22, 1049–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pedro, M.; Cerqueira, F.; Sousa, M.E.; Nascimento, M.S.J.; Pinto, M. Xanthones as inhibitors of growth of human cancer cell lines and their effects on the proliferation of human lymphocytes in vitro. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2002, 10, 3725–3730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Azevedo, C.; Pinto, C.M.M.; Pinto, M.M.M. Routes to Xanthones: An Update on the Synthetic Approaches. Curr. Org. Chem. 2012, 16, 2818–2867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Azevedo, C.; Afonso, C.; Soares, J.; Reis, S.; Sousa, S.; Lima, R.; Vasconcelos, M.H.; Pedro, M.; Barbosa, J.; Gales, L.; et al. Pyranoxanthones: Synthesis, growth inhibitory activity on human tumor cell lines and determination of their lipophilicity in two membrane models. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 69, 798–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sousa, M.E.; Pinto, M.M.M. Synthesis of Xanthones: An Overview. Curr. Med. Chem. 2005, 12, 2447–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Vermes, B.; Seligmann, O.; Wagner, H. Synthesis of xanthone O-glycosides. Part III. Synthesis of 1- and 8-O-β-D-glycosides of 5-O-methyl- and de-O-methylbellidifolin. Helv. Chim Acta 1985, 68, 2359–2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sousa, E.P.; Silva, A.M.S.; Pinto, M.M.M.; Pedro, M.M.; Cerqueira, F.A.M.; Nascimento, M.S.J. Isomeric Kielcorins and Dihydroxyxanthones: Synthesis, Structure Elucidation, and Inhibitory Activities of Growth of Human Cancer Cell Lines and on the Proliferation of Human Lymphocytes In Vitro. Helv. Chim Acta 2002, 85, 2862–2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cidade, H.; Rocha, V.; Palmeira, A.; Marques, C.; Tiritan, M.E.; Ferreira, H.; Lobo, J.S.; Almeida, I.F.; Sousa, M.E.; Pinto, M. In silico and in vitro antioxidant and cytotoxicity evaluation of oxygenated xanthone derivatives. Arab. J. Chem. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kasemwattanaroj, P.; Moongkarndi, P.; Pattanapanyasat, K.; Mamgmool, S.; Rodpai, E.; Samer, J.; Konlata, J.; Sukapirom, K. Immunomodulatory activities of alpha-mangostin on peripheral Blood mononuclear cells. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2013, 8, 1257–1260. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Ngoupayo, J.; Tabopda, T.; Ali, M. Antimicrobial and immunomodulatory properties of prenylated xanthones from twigs of Garcinia staudtii. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 5688–5695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Teixeira, M.; Cerqueira, F.; Barbosa, C.M.; Nascimento, M.S.; Pinto, M. Improvement of the inhibitory effect of xanthones on NO production by encapsulation in PLGA nanocapsules. J. Drug Target. 2005, 13, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Yu, L.; Shao, M.; Yang, B.; Bai, W. Immunomodulatory and anticancer activities of phenolics from Garcinia mangostana fruit pericarp. Food Chem. 2009, 116, 969–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Allavena, P.; Sica, A.; Solinas, G.; Porta, C.; Mantovani, A. The inflammatory micro-environment in tumor progression: The role of tumor-associated macrophages. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2008, 66, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Biswas, S.K.; Allavena, P.; Mantovani, A. Tumor-associated macrophages: Functional diversity, clinical significance, and open questions. Semin. Immunopathol. 2013, 35, 585–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Qian, B.Z.; Pollard, J.W. Macrophage diversity enhances tumor progression and metastasis. Cell 2010, 141, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Redente, E.; Dwyer-Nield, L.D.; Merrick, D.T.; Raina, K.; Agarwal, R.; Pao, W.; Rice, P.L.; Shroyer, K.R.; Malkinson, A.M. Tumor progression stage and anatomical site regulate tumor-associated macrophage and bone marrow-derived monocyte polarization. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 176, 2972–2985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zaynagetdinov, R.; Sherrill, T.P.; Polosukhin, V.V.; Han, W.; Ausborn, J.A.; McLoed, A.G.; McMahon, F.B.; Gleaves, L.A.; Degryse, A.L.; Stathopoulos, G.T.; et al. A critical role for macrophages in promotion of urethane-induced lung carcinogenesis. J. Immunol. 2011, 187, 5703–5711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Greten, F.R.; Eckmann, L.; Greten, T.F.; Park, J.M.; Li, Z.W.; Egan, L.J.; Kagnoff, M.F.; Karin, M. IKKbeta links inflammation and tumorigenesis in a mouse model of colitis-associated cancer. Cell 2004, 118, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Pikarsky, E.; Porat, R.M.; Stein, I.; Abramovitch, R.; Amit, S.; Kasem, S.; Gutkovich-Pyest, E.; Urieli-Shoval, S.; Galun, E.; Ben-Neriah, Y. NF-kappaB functions as a tumour promoter in inflammation-associated cancer. Nature 2004, 431, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chanmee, T.; Ontong, P.; Konno, K.; Itano, N. Tumor-Associated Macrophages as Major Players in the Tumor Microenvironment. Cancers 2014, 6, 1670–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Gordon, S.; Mantovani, A. Diversity and plasticity of mononuclear phagocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 2011, 41, 2470–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liao, Q.; Zeng, Z.; Guo, X.; Li, X.; Wei, F.; Zhang, W.; Li, X.; Chen, P.; Liang, F.; Xiang, B.; et al. LPLUNC1 suppresses IL-6-induced nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell proliferation via inhibiting the Stat3 activation. Oncogene 2014, 33, 2098–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mantovani, A.; Allavena, P.; Sica, A. Tumour-associated macrophages as a prototypic type II polarised phagocyte population: Role in tumour progression. Eur. J. Cancer 2004, 40, 1660–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sica, A.; Schioppa, T.; Mantovani, A.; Allavena, P. Tumour-associated macrophages are a distinct M2 polarised population promoting tumour progression: Potential targets of anti-cancer therapy. Eur. J. Cancer 2006, 42, 717–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Bernengo, M.G.; Quaglino, P.; Cappello, N.; Lisa, F.; Osella-Abate, S.; Fierro, M.T. Macrophage-mediated immunostimulation modulates therapeutic efficacy of interleukin-2 based chemoimmunotherapy in advanced metastatic melanoma patients. Melanoma Res. 2000, 10, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bröcker, E.B.; Zwadlo, G.; Holzmann, B.; Macher, E.; Sorg, C. Inflammatory cell infiltrates in human melanoma at different stages of tumor progression. Int. J. Cancer 1988, 41, 562–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Mäkitie, T.; Summanen, P.; Tarkkanen, A.; Kivelä, T. Tumor-infiltrating macrophages (CD68(+) cells) and prognosis in malignant uveal melanoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2001, 42, 1414–1421. [Google Scholar]
  41. Mantovani, A.; Sica, A. Macrophages, innate immunity and cancer: Balance, tolerance, and diversity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2010, 22, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Porta, C.; Kumar, B.S.; Larghi, P.; Rubino, L.; Mancino, A.; Sica, A. Tumor Promotion by Tumor-Associated Macrophages. In Advances in Molecular Oncology. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Fagagna, F., Chiocca, S., McBlane, F., Cavallaro, U., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2007; Volume 604, pp. 67–86. [Google Scholar]
  43. Solinas, G.; Germano, G.; Mantovani, A.; Allavena, P. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) as major players of the cancer-related inflammation. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2009, 86, 1065–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Varney, M.L.; Johansson, S.L.; Singh, R.K. Tumour-associated macrophage infiltration, neovascularization and aggressiveness in malignant melanoma: Role of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor-A. Melanoma Res. 2005, 15, 417–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jacobs, A.; Ignarro, L. Lipopolysaccharide-induced Expression of Interferon-β Mediates the Timing of Inducible Nitric-oxide Synthase Induction in RAW 264. 7 Macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 47950–47957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shinoda, J.; Mclaughlin, K.E.; Bell, H.S.; Swaroop, G.R.; Yamaguchi, S.-I.; Holmes, M.C.; Whittle, A.R. Molecular mechanisms underlying dexamethasone inhibition of iNOS expression and activity in C6 glioma cells. Glia 2003, 42, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xie, Q.W.; Kashiwabara, Y.; Nathan, C. Role of transcription factor NF-kappa B/Rel in induction of nitric oxide synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 4705–4708. [Google Scholar]
  48. Castanheiro, R.A.; Pinto, M.M.M.; Silva, A.M.S.; Cravo, S.M.; Gales, L.; Damas, A.M.; Nazareth, N.; Nascimento, M.S.; Eaton, G. Dihydroxyxanthones prenylated derivatives: Synthesis, structure elucidation, and growth inhibitory activity on human tumor cell lines with improvement of selectivity for MCF-7. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 6080–6088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gutierrez-Orozco, F.; Failla, M.L. Biological activities and bioavailability of mangosteen xanthones: A critical review of the current evidence. Nutrients 2013, 5, 3163–3183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liu, C.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Yang, S.; Zhang, A.; Yin, L.; Swarts, S.; Vidyasagar, S.; Zhang, L.; et al. Synthesis and anticancer potential of novel xanthone derivatives with 3,6-substituted chains. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2016, 24, 4263–4271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Obolskiy, D.; Pischel, I.; Siriwatanametanon, N.; Heinrich, M. Garcinia mangostana L.: A phytochemical and pharmacological review. Phytother. Res. 2009, 23, 1047–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sukandar, E.; Ersam, T.; Fatmawati, S.; Siripong, P.; Aree, T.; Tip-pyang, S. Cylindroxanthones A-C, three new xanthones and their cytotoxicity from the stem bark of Garcinia cylindrocarpa. Fitoterapia 2016, 198, 62–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Schildberger, A.; Rossmanith, E.; Eichhorn, T.; Strassl, K.; Weber, V. Monocytes, Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells, and THP-1 Cells Exhibit Different Cytokine Expression Patterns following Stimulation with Lipopolysaccharide. Mediat. Inflamm. 2013, 2013, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kouklakis, G.; Efremidou, E.I.; Pitiakoudis, M.; Lyratzopoulos, N.; Polychronidis, A. Development of primary malignant melanoma during treatment with a TNF-alpha antagonist for severe Crohn’s disease: A case report and review of the hypothetical association between TNF-alpha blockers and cancer. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2013, 7, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mariette, X.; Matucci-Cerinic, M.; Pavelka, K.; Taylor, P.; van Vollenhoven, R.; Heatley, R.; Walsh, C.; Lawson, R.; Reynolds, A.; Emery, P. Malignancies associated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in registries and prospective observational studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2011, 70, 1895–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Mercer, L.K.; Askling, J.; Raaschou, P.; Dixon, W.; Dreyer, L.; Hetland, M.; Strangfeld, A.; Zink, A.; Mariette, X.; Finckh, A.; et al. Risk of invasive melanoma in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biologics: Results from a collaborative project of 11 European biologic registers. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 76, 386–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Smith, M.; Sanchez-Laorden, B.; O’Brien, K.; Brunton, H.; Ferguson, J.; Young, H.; Dhomen, N.; Flaherty, K.; Frederick, D.; Cooper, Z.; et al. The immune-microenvironment confers resistance to MAP kinase pathway inhibitors through macrophage-derived TNFα. Cancer Discov. 2014, 4, 1214–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Giavazzi, R.; Garofalo, A.; Bani, M.R.; Abbate, M.; Ghezzi, P.; Boraschi, D.; Mantovani, A.; Dejana, E. Interleukin 1-induced augmentation of experimental metastases from a human melanoma in nude mice. Cancer Res. 1990, 50, 4771–4775. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  59. Meyer, C.; Sevko, A.; Ramacher, M.; Bazhin, A.V.; Falk, C.S.; Osen, W.; Borrello, I.; Kato, M.; Schadendorf, D.; Baniyash, M.; et al. Chronic inflammation promotes myeloid-derived suppressor cell activation blocking antitumor immunity in transgenic mouse melanoma model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 17111–17116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Apte, R.N.; Voronov, E. Is interleukin-1 a good or bad ‘guy’ in tumor immunobiology and immunotherapy? Immunol. Rev. 2008, 222, 222–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fairweather, D.; Cihakova, D. Alternatively activated macrophages in infection and autoimmunity. J. Autoimmun. 2009, 33, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Mimnaugh, E.; Monti, E.; Sebers, S.; Stetler-Stevenson, M.; Sinha, B. Synergistic Antiproliferative Effects of the Combination of Interleukin-1a and Doxorubicin against Human Melanoma Cells. Oncol. Res. 1992, 4, 401–412. [Google Scholar]
  63. Morinaga, Y.; Suzuki, H.; Takatsuki, F.; Akiyama, Y.; Taniyama, T.; Matsushima, K.; Onozaki, K. Contribution of Il-6 to the antiproliferative effect of IL-1 and tumor necrosis factor on tumor cell lines. J. Immunol. 1989, 143, 3538–3542. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Usui, N.; Mimnaugh, E.; Sinha, B. A role for the Interleukin 1 Receptor in the Synergistic Antitumor Effects on Human Interleukin 1a and Etoposide against Human Melanoma Cells. Cancer Res. 1991, 51, 769–774. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. García-Hernández, M.L.; Hernández-Pando, R.; Gariglio, P.; Berumen, J. Interleukin-10 promotes B16-melanoma growth by inhibition of macrophage functions and induction of tumour and vascular cell proliferation. Immunology 2002, 105, 231–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Itakura, E.; Huang, R.R.; Wen DRPaul, E.; Wünsch, P.H.; Cochran, A.J. IL-10 expression by primary tumor cells correlates with melanoma progression from radial to vertical growth phase and development of metastatic competence. Mod. Pathol. 2011, 24, 801–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Javelaud, D.; Alexaki, V.I.; Mauviel, A. Transforming growth factor-beta in cutaneous melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2008, 21, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Krasagakis, K.; Tholke, D.; Farthmann, B.; Eberle, J.; Mansmann, U.; Orfanos, C.E. Elevated plasma levels of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1 and TGF-beta2 in patients with disseminated malignant melanoma. Br. J. Cancer 1998, 77, 1492–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wink, D.A.; Vodovotz, Y.; Laval, J.; Laval, F.; Dewhirst, M.W.; Mitchell, J.B. The multifaceted roles of nitric oxide in cancer. Carcinogenesis 1998, 19, 711–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Choi, B.M.; Pae, H.O.; Jang, S.I.; Kim, Y.M.; Chung, H.T. Nitric oxide as a pro-apoptotic as well as anti-apoptotic modulator. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2002, 35, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ziche, M.; Morbidelli, L. Nitric oxide and angiogenesis. J. Neurooncol. 2000, 50, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wink, D.A.; Kasprzak, K.S.; Maragos, C.M.; Elespuru, R.K.; Misra, M.; Dunams, T.M.; Cebula, T.A.; Koch, W.H.; Andrews, A.W.; Allen, J.S.; et al. DNA deaminating ability and genotoxicity of nitric oxide and its progenitors. Science 1991, 254, 1001–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Lala, P.K.; Orucevic, A. Role of nitric oxide in tumor progression: Lessons from experimental tumors. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1998, 17, 91–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Choudhari, S.K.; Chaudhary, M.; Bagde, S.; Gadbail, A.R.; Joshi, V. Nitric oxide and cancer: A review. World, J. Surg. Oncol. 2013, 11, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ying, L.; Hofseth, L.J. An emerging role for endothelial nitric oxide synthase in chronic inflammation and cancer. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 1407–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. McCall, T.B.; Feelisch, M.; Palmer, R.M.; Moncada, S. Identification of N-iminoethyl-l-ornithine as an irreversible inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase in phagocytic cells. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1991, 102, 234–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Korhonen, R.; Lahti, A.; Hämäläinen, M.; Kankaanranta, H.; Moilanen, E. Dexamethasone inhibits inducible nitric-oxide synthase expression and nitric oxide production by destabilizing mRNA in lipopolysaccharide-treated macrophages. Mol. Pharmacol. 2002, 62, 698–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Monks, A.; Scudiero, D.; Skehan, P.; Shoemaker, R.; Paull, K.; Vistica, D.; Hose, C.; Langley, J.; Cronise, P.; Vaigro-Wolff, A. Feasibility of a high-flux anticancer drug screen using a diverse panel of cultured human tumor cell lines. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1991, 83, 757–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Gupta, S.; Rodrigues, L.M.; Esteves, A.P.; Oliveira-Campos, A.M.; Nascimento, M.S.; Nazareth, N.; Cidade, H.; Neves, M.P.; Fernandes, E.; Pinto, M.; et al. Synthesis of N-aryl-5-amino-4-cyanopyrazole derivatives as potent xanthine oxidase inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 43, 771–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. He, X.; Shu, J.; Xu, L.; Lu, C.; Lu, A. Inhibitory effect of Astragalus polysaccharides on lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF-a and IL-1beta production in THP-1 cells. Molecules 2012, 17, 3155–3164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chanput, W.; Reitsma, M.; Kleinjans, L.; Mes, J.J.; Savelkoul, H.F.; Wichers, H.J. β-Glucans are involved in immune-modulation of THP-1 macrophages. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2012, 56, 822–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chanput, W.; Mes, J.J.; Wichers, H.J. THP-1 cell line: An in vitro cell model for immune modulation approach. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2014, 23, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Cerqueira, F.; Cidade, H.; Van Ufford, L.; Beukelman, C.; Kijjoa, A.; Nascimento, M.S. The natural prenylated flavone artelastin is an inhibitor of ROS and NO production. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2008, 8, 597–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Cerqueira, F.; Cordeiro-da-Silva, A.; Araujo NCidade HKijjoa, A. Nascimento MS Inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation by prenylated flavones: Artelastin as a potent inhibitor. Life Sci. 2003, 73, 2321–2334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pharmaceuticals 12 00085 g001 550
Figure 1. Structure of 1,2-dihydroxyxanthone (1,2-DHX).
Figure 1. Structure of 1,2-dihydroxyxanthone (1,2-DHX).
Pharmaceuticals 12 00085 g001
Pharmaceuticals 12 00085 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of 1,2-dihydroxyxanthone (1,2-DHX; 50μM), lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated macrophage supernatants, and 1,2-DHX-conditioned LPS-stimulated macrophage supernatants on A375-C5 melanoma cell line growth. Results show mean values ± SEM (n ≥ 3). ** p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Effect of 1,2-dihydroxyxanthone (1,2-DHX; 50μM), lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated macrophage supernatants, and 1,2-DHX-conditioned LPS-stimulated macrophage supernatants on A375-C5 melanoma cell line growth. Results show mean values ± SEM (n ≥ 3). ** p < 0.05.
Pharmaceuticals 12 00085 g002
Pharmaceuticals 12 00085 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of 1,2-dihydroxyxanthone (1,2-DHX) on IL-1β, IL-10, TGF-β1, and TNF-α production by THP-1 macrophages. Cytokine production was evaluated after 24 h incubation with unstimulated macrophages (basal), LPS-stimulated macrophages (positive control), and LPS-stimulated macrophages treated with 1,2-DHX (50 or 100 µM). Data are the mean ± SEM from one experiment, performed with duplicate cultures, and are representative of three experiments carried out independently. * p < 0.001.
Figure 3. Effects of 1,2-dihydroxyxanthone (1,2-DHX) on IL-1β, IL-10, TGF-β1, and TNF-α production by THP-1 macrophages. Cytokine production was evaluated after 24 h incubation with unstimulated macrophages (basal), LPS-stimulated macrophages (positive control), and LPS-stimulated macrophages treated with 1,2-DHX (50 or 100 µM). Data are the mean ± SEM from one experiment, performed with duplicate cultures, and are representative of three experiments carried out independently. * p < 0.001.
Pharmaceuticals 12 00085 g003
Table
Table 1. Effect of 1,2-dihydroxyxanthone on the growth of the A375-C5 human melanoma cell line.
Table 1. Effect of 1,2-dihydroxyxanthone on the growth of the A375-C5 human melanoma cell line.
CompoundGrowth inhibition (GI50)
1,2-DHX55.4 ± 2.0 µM
Doxorubicin1.8 × 10−2 ± 0.4 × 10−2 µM
Results are the mean ± SEM (standard error of the mean) (n ≥ 3). Doxorubicin was used as a positive control. 1,2-DHX: 1,2-Dihydroxyxanthone. GI50: Concentration that was able to cause 50% cell growth inhibition.
Table
Table 2. Inhibitory effect of 1,2-dihydroxyxanthone (1,2-DHX) on nitric oxide (NO) production by RAW 264.7 cells.
Table 2. Inhibitory effect of 1,2-dihydroxyxanthone (1,2-DHX) on nitric oxide (NO) production by RAW 264.7 cells.
CompoundNO Inhibition (% of Control)
0 h6 h14 h
1,2-DHX (25 μM)56.6 ± 1.825.0 ± 2.8 *n.i.
L-NAME (62.5 μM)52.8 ± 5.050.7 ± 3.825.9 ± 2.7 **
Dexamethasone (6.25 μM)55.9 ± 2.315.7 ± 4.9 *n.i.
Macrophages were exposed to LPS and treated with 1,2-dihydroxyxanthone (1,2-DHX) at different times after stimulation: 0 (simultaneously with the stimulus), 6, or 14h after stimulation. Results are the mean ± SEM (n ≥ 3). n.i. = no inhibition. * p < 0.001, ** p < 0.05. N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) and dexamethasone were used as positive controls.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Silva, V.; Cerqueira, F.; Nazareth, N.; Medeiros, R.; Sarmento, A.; Sousa, E.; Pinto, M. 1,2-Dihydroxyxanthone: Effect on A375-C5 Melanoma Cell Growth Associated with Interference with THP-1 Human Macrophage Activity. Pharmaceuticals 2019, 12, 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph12020085

AMA Style

Silva V, Cerqueira F, Nazareth N, Medeiros R, Sarmento A, Sousa E, Pinto M. 1,2-Dihydroxyxanthone: Effect on A375-C5 Melanoma Cell Growth Associated with Interference with THP-1 Human Macrophage Activity. Pharmaceuticals. 2019; 12(2):85. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph12020085

Chicago/Turabian Style

Silva, Viviana, Fátima Cerqueira, Nair Nazareth, Rui Medeiros, Amélia Sarmento, Emília Sousa, and Madalena Pinto. 2019. "1,2-Dihydroxyxanthone: Effect on A375-C5 Melanoma Cell Growth Associated with Interference with THP-1 Human Macrophage Activity" Pharmaceuticals 12, no. 2: 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph12020085

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop