Next Article in Journal
A Bifunctional Silicon Dielectric Metasurface Based on Quasi-Bound States in the Continuum
Previous Article in Journal
Wettability Changes Due to Nanomaterials and Alkali—A Proposed Formulation for EOR
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Adsorption Performance of Amino Functionalized Magnetic Molecular Sieve Adsorbent for Effective Removal of Lead Ion from Aqueous Solution

1
Shandong University of Political Science and Law, Jinan 250014, China
2
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250353, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(9), 2353; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11092353
Submission received: 14 August 2021 / Revised: 7 September 2021 / Accepted: 8 September 2021 / Published: 11 September 2021

Abstract

:
Lead ion (Pb2+) has high toxicity and brings great harm to human body. It is very important to find an effective method to address lead ion pollution. In this work, amino functionalized CoFe2O4/SBA–15 nanocomposite (NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15) was prepared for the effective removal of Pb2+ from aqueous solution. The prepared NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15 adsorbent was manifested by using scanning electron microscope (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), Fourier transform infrared spectrum (FTIR), X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis. In the meantime, the adsorption conditions, including pH, adsorbent dosage, and adsorption time, were studied. The investigation of adsorption kinetics revealed that the adsorption results conform to the pseudo-first-order kinetic model. The adsorption isotherms research displayed that the adsorption was consistent with the Freundlich model, demonstrating that the adsorption for Pb2+ with the prepared adsorbent was a multimolecular layer adsorption process. In addition, the thermodynamic investigations (ΔG < 0, ΔH > 0, ΔS > 0) demonstrated that the adsorption for Pb2+ with the prepared adsorbent was endothermic and spontaneous. Moreover, the prepared adsorbent showed superior anti-interference performance and reusability, implying the potential application of the adsorbent in actual water treatment. Furthermore, this research may provide a reference and basis for the study of other heavy metal ions.

1. Introduction

In the process of industrial production, the substandard discharge of wastewater releases a variety of heavy metal ions into the natural environment. A great quantity of heavy metal ions become one of the main environmental pollutants [1,2]. These dissolved heavy metal ions in water can cause adverse effects on aquatic ecosystems. Long−term exposure to water which has been contaminated by heavy metals can cause serious harm to human health [3,4,5,6]. Lead ion (Pb2+) is a common pollutant in industrial wastewater, which can cause human dysfunction or serious lesions if ingested in large quantities or for a long time [7,8]. For example, Pb2+ can cause liver and kidney damage, affect the production of human hemoglobin, damage the human nervous system, cause mental retardation in infants, cause infertility and fetal malformation, etc. [9]. The general techniques for the removal of heavy metal ions in water include precipitation [10], ion exchange [11], reverse osmosis [12], nanofiltration [13], adsorption [14], etc. Among them, the adsorption method has gained extensive attention due to its simple, low cost and can overcome some potential environmental problems [15,16,17,18].
Since adsorbents with large specific surface area have a strong adsorption capacity, many researches with regard to adsorbents have focused on materials with a large specific surface area [19,20,21,22]. A molecular sieve is a kind of material with large surface area. Moreover, it also possesses the advantages of stable physical and chemical properties, uniform pore size distribution, and easy to achieve chemical modification, etc. [23,24,25,26]. Therefore, a molecular sieve is a kind of adsorbing material with great potential. SBA–15 is a typical molecular sieve with a uniform mesoporous structure [27,28]. The mesoporous pore provides enough space for chemical modification of grafted functional groups, while sufficient wall thickness makes it exhibit superior mechanical stability and hydrothermal stability than similar materials [29,30]. These above properties provide reliable guarantee for designing adsorbents. The development of mesoporous silica adsorbents functionalized with appropriate functional groups is a prospective research area for eliminating heavy metal ions away from water resources [31,32].
For the purpose of improving solid-liquid separation efficiency toward the adsorbent [33,34], we prepared the magnetic molecular sieve adsorbent by compositing SBA–15 and magnetic CoFe2O4, which could be separated well from water through an external magnetic field. To improve the adsorption capacity of the adsorbent, the surface of the prepared CoFe2O4/SBA–15 nanocomposite was aminated to enhance the complexation ability toward heavy metal ions. Herein, the adsorption properties of amino functionalized CoFe2O4/SBA–15 nanocomposite (NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15) for Pb2+ were investigated by using single factor experiment to optimize the adsorption process (Figure 1). Meanwhile, the adsorption kinetics, adsorption isotherm model and thermodynamic studies were investigated. Moreover, the prepared NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15 adsorbent exhibited excellent selectivity and reusability for adsorbing Pb2+, indicating the potential application of the adsorbent in the field of environmental protection.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Apparatus and Reagents

SBA–15 (CAS Number: 12173-28-3, pore diameter: 6–11 nm) was obtained from XFNANO Materials Tech Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). Fe(NO3)3 was purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Beijing Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Co(NO3)2·6H2O was obtained from Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane was purchased from Aladdin Bio-Chem Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Ultrapure water was applied in all experiment for the preparation of solution. All other reagents were employed with analytical reagent grade and used without further purification.
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) pictures were conducted with field-emission SEM (Gemini 300, Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Fourier transform infrared spectrum (FTIR) spectra was obtained by using KBr pellet method ranging from 4000 cm−1 to 400 cm−1 with Perkin−Elmer Spectrum One FTIR spectrometer (Perkin−Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) pattern was obtained by using a D8 FOCUS X−ray diffraction spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany), together with a Cu Kα target at a scanning rate of 0.03° 2θ s−1 in the range of 10–80°. Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis was conducted by using Micromeritics ASAP 2020 surface area and porosity analyzer (Quantachrome, Boynton Beach, FL, USA). The atomic absorption spectrophotometry was proceeded by using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.2. Synthesis of Magnetic CoFe2O4/SBA–15

CoFe2O4/SBA–15 was synthesized by one step immersion method as follows: Firstly, 0.116 g of Co(NO3)2·6H2O and 0.323 g of Fe(NO3)3 were mixed in three-neck flask with 20 mL of ultrapure water. Then 0.2 g of SBA–15 was added into the above solution with stir for mixing well. Afterwards, the flask was moved to the oil bath under 50 °C with continuous agitation. After the water in flask been evaporated to dryness, the obtained solid was moved to crucible and calcined for 5 h at 800 °C. Eventually, the magnetic CoFe2O4/SBA–15 could be obtained.

2.3. Synthesis of Amino Functionalized CoFe2O4/SBA–15

0.5 g of CoFe2O4/SBA–15 was dispersed into 50 mL of absolute ethanol. Then 1 mL of 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) was injected into the solution, followed with mechanically stirring and maintaining in oil bath for 24 h. The obtained solid was separated under magnetic field and rinsed with ethanol several times. After being disposed in drying oven at 60 °C, the product was grinded and the NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15 could be obtained.

2.4. Single Factor Static Adsorption Experiment

This research was conducted by using single factor static adsorption method for investigating the adsorption of Pb2+ onto NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15. The adsorption experiment was proceeded in 100 mL of conical flask at ambient temperature by placing the conical flask in a thermostatic water bath oscillator, along with Pb2+ solution (30 mg·L−1, 25 mL). 0.1 mol·L−1 of NaNO3 was injected into the Pb2+ solution as constant back−ground electrolyte. The effect of adsorbent dosage for adsorbing Pb2+ was operated by using different amounts of adsorbent contacting with Pb2+ for 3 h. The pH was adjusted by using HCl and NaOH for studying the influence of pH toward the adsorption of Pb2+. The adsorbent could be separated rapidly from solution by a magnet. The residual Pb2+ concentration in equilibrium was monitored by using atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Furthermore, the interfering ion experiment and the reusability of the prepared adsorbent were also investigated.
The removal efficiency as well as the adsorbing capacity were calculated based on the changes of Pb2+ concentration before and after the adsorption on the basis of the following calculation method:
R = c 0 c e c 0 × 100 %
q e = ( c 0 c e ) × V m
where co (mg·L−1) and ce (mg·L−1) represent the initial and equalized contents of Pb2+, respectively. R (%) is the removal efficiency and qe (mg·g−1) is the adsorption capacity when the adsorption becomes equilibrium. The volume of Pb2+ solution is expressed as V (L) and the mass of adsorbent is described as m (g).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15

Figure 2A,B show the morphology of SBA–15 and CoFe2O4/SBA–15. As can be seen from Figure 2A, the SBA–15 owned chaplet-like shape. Observed from Figure 2B, the surface of SBA–15 appeared new nanoparticles, which was due to the formation of CoFe2O4. Furthermore, energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) was applied to analysis the component of the adsorbent. As Figure 2C shows, the adsorbent contained not only the elements of Si and O, but also contained Fe and Co, demonstrating the existence of constituent elements for CoFe2O4/SBA–15.
The XRD pattern was further used to analysis the NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15. As shown in Figure 2D, the dispersion peak nearly 2θ = 23° was attributed to the amorphous SBA–15. The other diffraction peaks in the figure were consistent with the spectrum of CoFe2O4 [35]. According to the above results, it could conclude that the CoFe2O4 was loaded on SBA–15 successfully.
Figure 2E shows the BET analysis of NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15. Since the existence of the adsorption and desorption hysteresis loop, it is obvious that the NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15 owns uniform and orderly mesoporous channels, which is beneficial for adsorbing Pb2+. The specific surface area which was measured for the prepared NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15 was about 273.8 m2·g−1, which was lower than pure SBA–15 (about 550 m2·g−1). This might be due to the fact that the introduction of CoFe2O4 blocked the pores of SBA–15, and thus the specific surface area of NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15 decreased.
Figure 2F displays the FTIR spectrum of NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15. As shown in the spectrum, the bond of N–H stretching vibration can be testified by the peak at 3435 cm−1, while the peak at the position of 1633 cm−1 belonged to the deformation vibration absorption peak of N–H. The peaks at 2930 cm−1 were the absorption peak of C–H. The peak at 1099 cm−1 was the Si–O absorption peak of SBA–15. The results further illustrated the successful synthesis of NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15.

3.2. Influence of pH toward Removal Efficiency

The pH of the employed solution is considered to be a critical ingredient to impact the adsorption process [36]. The impact is mainly reflected in the following aspects. Firstly, the solution pH could affect the charge type and charge number on the adsorbent, which determines whether the adsorption process can either occur or not occur. Secondly, the charge number on the adsorbent surface determines the molar ratio of adsorbent and adsorbate when it reaches saturated adsorption. Thirdly, the pH could influence the existing form of pollutant, further affect the state of adsorbent or pollutant, which determines the mechanism of the adsorption process.
In this study, we mainly investigated the effect of pH toward the adsorption of Pb2+ with NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15. The experiment was conducted as follows: 25 mL 30 mg·L−1 of Pb2+ solution was added into the 100 mL conical flask. HNO3 and NaOH were applied to adjust the pH. Then 10 mg of adsorbent was added and vibrated for 3 h at room temperature. The residual Pb2+ was measured and the removal efficiency could be obtained. Observed from Figure 3A, when the pH of the solution was under 4.0, the efficiency for the removal of Pb2+ was very low. With the increase of the pH, the removal efficiency increased. And the maximum removal efficiency was from pH 5.0 to pH 6.0. This result could be interpreted as follows: When at low pH, the H+ and Pb2+ in solution were competitive with each other. And the H+ could protonate the –NH2 on the surface of adsorbent. The surface of the adsorbent is positively charged, which could repel with Pb2+ because of the static electricity. Furthermore, the H+ hindered the coordination between Pb2+ and adsorbent, decreasing the adsorption capacity of the adsorbent. However, when the pH increased, the –NH2 on the surface of adsorbent deprotonated. Then the –NH2 as electron-rich group would attract a positively charged Pb2+ and complex with it. Thus, the adsorption capacity increased. According to the experimental results, the optimal pH 5.0 was chosen for future experiment.

3.3. Effect of Adsorbent Dosage on the Removal Efficiency

Selected amount of NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15 were added into 100 mL round-bottom flask with 25 mL 30 mg·L−1 of Pb2+ (pH 5.0) and agitated for 3 h at ambient temperature. The influence of adsorbent dosage toward the removal of Pb2+ displays in Figure 3B. When the adsorbent dosage aggrandized, the removal efficiency for Pb2+ fortified. As the adsorbent dosage was 10 mg, the removal efficiency became very high and changed little with the increase of the adsorbent dosage. Thus, the adsorbent dosage of 10 mg was selected in the subsequent experiment.

3.4. Influence of Adsorption Time and Adsorption Kinetics

Adsorption kinetics resulting from the adsorption process are crucial in the process of studying adsorption behavior, which reflects the basic information of adsorption rate and reaction routes [37,38]. The effect of adsorption time was investigated in this study. In the condition of the selected pH and adsorbent dosage in the preliminary experiment, different adsorption times were applied to investigate the adsorption of Pb2+ by using NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15. As shown in Figure 4A, the adsorption process reached equilibrium at 150 min.
Adsorption kinetics has been an important aspect for study the adsorption mechanism. Herein, the pseudo-first-order kinetic model, pseudo-second-order kinetic model, and Elovich kinetic model were employed to explore the dynamics features for the adsorption behavior. Each model could be presented below:
Pseudo-first-order kinetic model:
ln ( q e q t ) = ln q e k 1 t
Pseudo-second-order kinetic model:
t q t = 1 k 2 q e 2 + t q e
Elovich kinetic model:
q t = 1 β ln ( α β ) + 1 β ln ( t / min )
here qt (mg·g−1) represents the adsorption capacities at time t (min). qe (mg·g−1) represents the adsorption capacities at equilibrium adsorption. The pseudo-first-order rate constant and pseudo-second-order rate constant are denoted as k1 (min−1) and k2 (g·mg−1·min−1) separately. The initial adsorption rate in Elovich model is defined as α (mg·g−1·min−1), while the desorption constant is expressed as β (g·mg−1).
The kinetic results are displayed in Figure 4B–D and the corresponding calculative results were presented in Table 1. Observed from the matching results, either the pseudo-first-order kinetic model or the pseudo-second-order kinetic model had high linear coefficient. However, the test result of the equilibrium adsorbing amount was 67.61 mg·g−1, close to the result from the pseudo-first-order kinetic model (69.78 mg·g−1). The relative error was only 3.2%, indicating that the adsorption kinetic process can be fitted splendidly by pseudo-first-order kinetic model, indicating that the adsorption behavior was dominated by diffusion step.

3.5. Adsorption Isotherms Study

Herein, four kinds of adsorption isotherm models were applied to investigate the surface behavior of the prepared adsorbent in the solution:
Henry model:
q e = k c e
Langmuir model:
1 q e = 1 b q m c e + 1 q m
Freundlich model:
ln q e = ln K F + 1 n ln c e
Temkin model:
q e = R T b T ln c e + R T b T ln A T
where qm (mg·g−1) represents the maximum adsorption capacity. b (L·mg−1) represents Langmuir constant about the binding capacity of the binding site. k (L·g−1) and KF (L·g−1) represent the corresponding constants for adsorption capacity and strength. R T b T is relevant toward the adsorption heat. AT (L·g−1) represents the constant in equilibrium related with the supreme binding energy. n (dimensionless) is an empirical parameter related to the intensity of adsorption, which varies with the heterogeneity of the adsorbent.
Figure 5 revealed the results of adsorption isotherms which were fitted by the above four models. The parameters which were calculated according to the four models are presented in Table 2. Observed from Table 2, the adsorption behavior could be well fitted by using the Freundlich model (R2= 0.9942) which is higher than the correlation coefficient of other models. The simulated results revealed that the adsorption behavior was consistent with the Freundlich model, manifesting that the adsorption for Pb2+ was a multi-molecular layer adsorption process.
The Freundlich isotherm model demonstrates that the ratio of solute adsorbed on solid surface to the solute concentration has a certain relationship toward the solution concentration. This model considers multiple types of adsorption sites on the solid and represents the adsorption data at low concentrations and intermediate concentrations on heterogeneous surfaces felicitously. And the symbol of n reveals that the adsorption process occurs on the heterogeneous surfaces and is a reversible course.

3.6. Thermodynamic Parameters Study

The influence of temperatures on Pb2+ adsorption was investigated under the temperatures of 298 K, 308 K, and 318 K. The thermodynamic variables were obtained by using the calculation method below:
Δ G = R T ln K d
ln K d = Δ S R Δ H R T
Herein, R (8.314 J·mol−1·K−1) represents the gas constant. T represents the (Kelvin) temperature (K). Kd represents the adsorption equilibrium constant. The Gibbs free energy change is defined as ΔG (kJ·mol−1). The entropy change is expressed as ΔS (J·mol−1·K−1). Furthermore, ΔH (kJ·mol−1) demonstrates the enthalpy change in a given process. The obtained results of the thermodynamic parameters were displayed in Table 3. From the table, it can be seen that the ΔG was less than 0, indicating the spontaneous adsorption process for the removal of Pb2+. While the ΔH with positive value manifested the endothermic process of the adsorption for Pb2+ by using the prepared adsorbent. Meanwhile, the positive value of ΔS indicated the increase in degree of chaos at the interface of solid and solution as well as the good affinity of Pb2+ with NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15.

3.7. Evaluation of Adsorption Performance

The existing interfering ions including Na+, K+, Mg2+ and Ca2+ might influence the adsorption of Pb2+. Hence the adsorption interference experiments were conducted by adding NaNO3, KNO3, Mg(NO3)2 and Ca(NO3)2 into the solutions containing lead ions, respectively. Observed from Figure 6A, the concomitant interfering ions almost had no influence on the Pb2+ adsorption. Therefore, it could be concluded that the prepared adsorbent can adsorb Pb2+ effectively.
The reusability is an important index to investigate the property of the adsorbent [39]. Herein, to investigate the reusability of the prepared adsorbent, an adsorption-desorption experiment was conducted by adding the adsorbent which has adsorbed Pb2+ into 15 mL of NaOH solution (0.1 mol·L−1) and maintained for 3 h. Afterwards, the adsorbent was washed with ultrapure water to remove the excess alkali solution for three times. Observed from Figure 6B, five times of adsorption-desorption cycles were studied. The consequences showed that the adsorption efficiency decreased to some extent. After five cycles, the removal efficiency kept at above 77%, indicating that the prepared adsorbent NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15 possessed good performance as recyclable adsorbent in dealing with the wastewater containing Pb2+.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, a novel NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15 adsorbent was prepared and applied in the adsorption of Pb2+. The adsorption results revealed that the adsorption behavior intensively relied on the pH of the solution with an adsorbent dosage of 10 mg and pH 5.0. The results of adsorption kinetics research can be well described by the pseudo-first-order kinetic model, revealing that the adsorption process was controlled by diffusion step. Meanwhile, the adsorption isotherms research indicated that the adsorption behavior could be expressed better through the Freundlich model. The thermodynamic studies (ΔG < 0, ΔH > 0, ΔS > 0) revealed the endothermic and spontaneous character of the adsorption behavior. The excellent selectivity and reusability of the prepared adsorbent made it a promising adsorbing material in the treatment of actural wastewater containing lead ions. However, the prepared adsorbent could only adsorb the single Pb2+. If the adsorbent could interact with other contaminants simultaneously and effectively, it will greatly expand its application in the field of environmental protection.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.W. (Yaoguang Wang); methodology, C.G. and Y.W. (Yingying Wang); validation, Y.W. (Yaoguang Wang); formal analysis, C.G. and F.W.; investigation, C.G. and Y.W. (Yingying Wang); resources, Y.W. (Yaoguang Wang); data curation, C.G. and Y.W. (Yaoguang Wang); writing—original draft preparation, C.G. and Y.W. (Yingying Wang); writing—review and editing, Y.W. (Yaoguang Wang); visualization, Y.W. (Yaoguang Wang); supervision, Y.W. (Yaoguang Wang); project administration, Y.W. (Yaoguang Wang); funding acquisition, Y.W. (Yaoguang Wang). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22006080), Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2020QB094), the Program for Scientific Research Innovation Team in Colleges and Universities of Shandong Province.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Peng, Y.; Huang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Kang, C.; Chen, S.; Song, L.; Liu, D.; Zhong, C. A versatile MOF-based trap for heavy metal ion capture and dispersion. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Sarma, D.; Islam, S.M.; Subrahmanyam, K.S.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Efficient and selective heavy metal sequestration from water by using layered sulfide K2xSn4−xS8−x (x = 0.65 − 1; KTS−3). J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 16597–16605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mao, M.; Yan, T.; Shen, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, D. Selective capacitive removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater over lewis base sites of S–Doped Fe–N–C cathodes via an electro-adsorption process. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 7665–7673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mao, M.; Yan, T.; Shen, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, D. Capacitive removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater via an electro-adsorption and electro-reaction coupling process. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 3333–3340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wei, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, X.; Gao, X.; Zheng, Y.; Zuo, H.; Wei, Z. Roles of different humin and heavy-metal resistant bacteria from composting on heavy metal removal. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 296, 122375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, F.; Chi, H.; Zhao, G.; Zhang, Y.; Li, T.; Wei, Q. Electrochemical aptasensor based on gold modified thiol graphene as sensing platform and gold-palladium modified zirconium metal-organic frameworks nanozyme as signal enhancer for ultrasensitive detection of mercury ions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 606, 510–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zhang, L.; Shang, Z.; Guo, K.; Chang, Z.; Liu, H.; Li, D. Speciation analysis and speciation transformation of heavy metal ions in passivation process with thiol-functionalized nano-silica. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 369, 979–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. He, Q.; Han, Y.; Huang, Y.; Gao, J.; Gao, Y.; Han, L.; Zhang, Y. Reusable dual-enhancement SERS sensor based on graphene and hybrid nanostructures for ultrasensitive lead (II) detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 341, 130031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Y.; Zhao, G.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Cao, W.; Li, T.; Wei, Q. An electrochemical aptasensor based on gold -modified MoS2/rGO nanocomposite and gold -palladium -modified Fe-MOFs for sensitive detection of lead ions. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 319, 128313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Grimshaw, P.; Calo, J.M.; Hradil, G. Cyclic electrowinning/precipitation (CEP) system for the removal of heavy metal mixtures from aqueous solutions. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 175, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bashir, A.; Malik, L.A.; Ahad, S.; Manzoor, T.; Bhat, M.A.; Dar, G.N.; Pandith, A.H. Removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous system by ion-exchange and biosorption methods. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2019, 17, 729–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Malamis, S.; Katsou, E.; Takopoulos, K.; Demetriou, P.; Loizidou, M. Assessment of metal removal, biomass activity and RO concentrate treatment in an MBR-RO system. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 209, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Balanya, T.; Labanda, J.; Llorens, J.; Sabate, J. Separation of metal ions and chelating agents by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 345, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, Y.; Hu, L.; Zhang, G.; Yan, T.; Yan, L.; Wei, Q.; Du, B. Removal of Pb(II) and methylene blue from aqueous solution by magnetic hydroxyapatite-immobilized oxidized multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 494, 380–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, Y.; Shi, L.; Gao, L.; Wei, Q.; Cui, L.; Hu, L.; Yan, L.; Du, B. The removal of lead ions from aqueous solution by using magnetic hydroxypropyl chitosan/oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes composites. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 451, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Rong, N.; Chen, C.; Ouyang, K.; Zhang, K.; Wang, X.; Xu, Z. Adsorption characteristics of directional cellulose nanofiber/chitosan/montmorillonite aerogel as adsorbent for wastewater treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 274, 119120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hallam, L.; Papasergio, A.E.; Lessio, M.; Veliscek-Carolan, J. Phosphate functionalised titania for heavy metal removal from acidic sulfate solutions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 600, 719–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Alammar, A.; Park, S.-H.; Ibrahim, I.; Arun, D.; Holtzl, T.; Dumee, L.F.; Lim, H.N.; Szekely, G. Architecting neonicotinoid-scavenging nanocomposite hydrogels for environmental remediation. Appl. Mater. Today 2020, 21, 100878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zeng, X.; Yao, H.; Ma, N.; Fan, Y.; Wang, C.; Shi, R. Synthesis, characterization and adsorption performance of a novel post-crosslinked adsorbent. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 354, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Barrejon, M.; Syrgiannis, Z.; Burian, M.; Bosi, S.; Montini, T.; Fornasiero, P.; Amenitsch, H.; Prato, M. Cross-linked carbon nanotube adsorbents for water treatment: Tuning the sorption capacity through chemical functionalization. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 12920–12930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zeng, X.; Yu, T.; Wang, P.; Yuan, R.; Wen, Q.; Fan, Y.; Wang, C.; Shi, R. Preparation and characterization of polar polymeric adsorbents with high surface area for the removal of phenol from water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 177, 773–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, Z.; Jiang, C.; Li, D.; Lei, Y.; Yao, H.; Zhou, G.; Wang, K.; Rao, Y.; Liu, W.; Xu, C.; et al. Micro-mesoporous activated carbon simultaneously possessing large surface area and ultra-high pore volume for efficiently adsorbing various VOCs. Carbon 2020, 170, 567–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhao, D.; Huo, Q.; Feng, J.; Chmelka, B.F.; Stucky, G.D. Nonionic triblock and star diblock copolymer and oligomeric surfactant syntheses of highly ordered, hydrothermally stable, mesoporous silica structures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 10546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhao, D.; Feng, J.; Huo, Q.; Melosh, N.; Fredrickson, G.H.; Chmelka, B.F.; Stucky, G.D. Triblock copolymer syntheses of mesoporous silica with periodic 50 to 300 angstrom pores. Science 1998, 279, 548–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Liu, C.; Kubo, T.; Naito, T.; Otsuka, K. Controllable molecular sieving by copoly(poly(ethylene glycol) acrylate/poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate)-based hydrogels via capillary electrophoresis for DNA fragments. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2020, 2, 3886–3893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hardian, R.; Pogany, P.; Lee, Y.M.; Szekely, G. Molecular sieving using metal-polymer coordination membranes in organic media. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 14400–14410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gong, T.; Li, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, J.; Xie, G.; Lei, B.; Zhuang, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, H. Synthesis of SBA-15 assembled with silicon nanoparticles with different morphologies for oxygen sensing. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2020, 296, 110001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, J.; Fernandez, L.; Vargas-Osorio, Z.; Vazquez-Vazquez, C.; Pineiro, Y.; Rivas, J.; Feijoo, G.; Moreira, M.T. Reusable Fe3O4/SBA15 nanocomposite as an efficient photo-fenton catalyst for the removal of sulfamethoxazole and orange II. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Han, J.; Fang, P.; Jiang, W.; Li, L.; Guo, R. Ag-nanoparticle-loaded mesoporous silica: Spontaneous formation of Ag nanoparticles and mesoporous silica SBA-15 by a one-pot strategy and their catalytic applications. Langmuir 2012, 28, 4768–4775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Liu, H.; Ding, W.; Lei, S.; Tian, X.; Zhou, F. Selective adsorption of CH4/N2 on Ni-based MOF/SBA-15 composite materials. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Cheng, M.; Wang, Z.; Lv, Q.; Li, C.; Sun, S.; Hu, S. Preparation of amino-functionalized Fe3O4@mSiO2 core-shell magnetic nanoparticles and their application for aqueous Fe3+ removal. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 341, 198–206. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sierra, I.; Perez-Quintanilla, D. Heavy metal complexation on hybrid mesoporous silicas: An approach to analytical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 3792–3807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kisszekelyi, P.; Hardian, R.; Vovusha, H.; Chen, B.; Zeng, X.; Schwingenschlogl, U.; Kupai, J.; Szekely, G. Selective electrocatalytic oxidation of biomass-derived 5-hydroxymethylfurfural to 2,5-diformylfuran: From mechanistic investigations to catalyst recovery. ChemSusChem 2020, 13, 3127–3136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mahmoudi, B.; Rostami, A.; Kazemnejadi, M.; Hamah-Ameen, B.A. Catalytic oxidation of alcohols and alkyl benzenes to carbonyls using Fe3O4@SiO2@(TEMPO)-co-(Chlorophyll-CoIII) as a bi-functional, self-co-oxidant nanocatalyst. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 6600–6613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Permien, S.; Indris, S.; Schurmann, U.; Kienle, L.; Zander, S.; Doyle, S.; Bensch, W. What happens structurally and electronically during the Li conversion reaction of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles: An operando XAS and XRD investigation. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 434–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, T.; Han, X.; Wang, Y.; Yan, L.; Du, B.; Wei, Q.; Wei, D. Magnetic chitosan/anaerobic granular sludge composite: Synthesis, characterization and application in heavy metal ions removal. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 508, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Azizian, S.; Haerifar, M.; Bashiri, H. Adsorption of methyl violet onto granular activated carbon: Equilibrium, kinetics and modeling. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 146, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yu, X.-Y.; Luo, T.; Zhang, Y.-X.; Jia, Y.; Zhu, B.-J.; Fu, X.-C.; Liu, J.-H.; Huang, X.-J. Adsorption of lead(II) on O2-plasma-oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes: Thermodynamics, kinetics, and desorption. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 2585–2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Jain, S.N.; Shaikh, Z.; Mane, V.S.; Vishnoi, S.; Mawal, V.N.; Patel, O.R.; Bhandari, P.S.; Gaikwad, M.S. Nonlinear regression approach for acid dye remediation using activated adsorbent: Kinetic, isotherm, thermodynamic and reusability studies. Microchem. J. 2019, 148, 605–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The schematic diagram for the application of NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15 toward Pb2+ adsorption in the presence of external magnetic field.
Figure 1. The schematic diagram for the application of NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15 toward Pb2+ adsorption in the presence of external magnetic field.
Nanomaterials 11 02353 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of SBA–15 (A) and CoFe2O4/SBA–15 (B); EDS spectrum of CoFe2O4/SBA–15 (C); XRD pattern (D), BET analysis (E), and FTIR spectrum (F) of NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15.
Figure 2. SEM images of SBA–15 (A) and CoFe2O4/SBA–15 (B); EDS spectrum of CoFe2O4/SBA–15 (C); XRD pattern (D), BET analysis (E), and FTIR spectrum (F) of NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15.
Nanomaterials 11 02353 g002
Figure 3. Effect of pH (A) and adsorbent dosage (B) on adsorption of Pb2+ (initial content of Pb2+: 25 mL 30 mg·L−1; time: 3 h; temperature: ambient temperature).
Figure 3. Effect of pH (A) and adsorbent dosage (B) on adsorption of Pb2+ (initial content of Pb2+: 25 mL 30 mg·L−1; time: 3 h; temperature: ambient temperature).
Nanomaterials 11 02353 g003
Figure 4. Influence of adsorption time toward the removal efficiency (A); pseudo-first-order kinetic model (B), pseudo-second-order kinetic model (C), and Elovich kinetic model (D) for adsorption of Pb2+.
Figure 4. Influence of adsorption time toward the removal efficiency (A); pseudo-first-order kinetic model (B), pseudo-second-order kinetic model (C), and Elovich kinetic model (D) for adsorption of Pb2+.
Nanomaterials 11 02353 g004
Figure 5. Henry (A), Langmuir (B), Freundlich (C), and Temkin (D) adsorption isotherms of Pb2+.
Figure 5. Henry (A), Langmuir (B), Freundlich (C), and Temkin (D) adsorption isotherms of Pb2+.
Nanomaterials 11 02353 g005
Figure 6. (A) Influence of interfering ions for Pb2+ adsorption (a: blank; b: Na+; c: K+; d: Mg2+; e: Ca2+; f: mixture of the above ions); (B) Reusability about the prepared adsorbent.
Figure 6. (A) Influence of interfering ions for Pb2+ adsorption (a: blank; b: Na+; c: K+; d: Mg2+; e: Ca2+; f: mixture of the above ions); (B) Reusability about the prepared adsorbent.
Nanomaterials 11 02353 g006
Table 1. Kinetic model parameters for the adsorption of Pb2+.
Table 1. Kinetic model parameters for the adsorption of Pb2+.
ModelsParameters
Pseudo-first-order kinetic modelqe (mg·g−1)69.78
k1 (min−1)0.01974
R20.9898
Pseudo-second-order kinetic modelqe (mg·g−1)94.34
k2 (g·mg−1·min−1)0.0001660
R20.9974
Elovich kinetic modelα (mg·g−1·min−1)3.436
β (g·mg−1)0.05071
R20.9842
Table 2. Parameters of adsorption isotherm for adsorbing Pb2+ with NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15.
Table 2. Parameters of adsorption isotherm for adsorbing Pb2+ with NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15.
ModelsParameters
Henryk6.447
R20.9782
Langmuirqm (mg·g−1)89.13
b (L·mg−1)0.2664
R20.9641
FreundlichKF16.71
n1.470
R20.9942
TemkinbT88.0
AT1.613
R20.8659
Table 3. Thermodynamic parameters for adsorption of Pb2+ with NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15.
Table 3. Thermodynamic parameters for adsorption of Pb2+ with NH2–CoFe2O4/SBA–15.
T (K)ΔG (kJ·mol−1)ΔS (J·mol−1·K−1)ΔH (kJ·mol−1)
298−5.45121.530.76
308−6.66
318−7.88
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, C.; Wang, Y.; Wang, F.; Wang, Y. Adsorption Performance of Amino Functionalized Magnetic Molecular Sieve Adsorbent for Effective Removal of Lead Ion from Aqueous Solution. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2353. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11092353

AMA Style

Guo C, Wang Y, Wang F, Wang Y. Adsorption Performance of Amino Functionalized Magnetic Molecular Sieve Adsorbent for Effective Removal of Lead Ion from Aqueous Solution. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(9):2353. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11092353

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Chuanen, Yingying Wang, Fangzheng Wang, and Yaoguang Wang. 2021. "Adsorption Performance of Amino Functionalized Magnetic Molecular Sieve Adsorbent for Effective Removal of Lead Ion from Aqueous Solution" Nanomaterials 11, no. 9: 2353. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11092353

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop