Next Article in Journal
Using Design of Experiments to Optimize a Screening Analytical Methodology Based on Solid-Phase Microextraction/Gas Chromatography for the Determination of Volatile Methylsiloxanes in Water
Next Article in Special Issue
Endosomal pH-Responsive Fe-Based Hyaluronate Nanoparticles for Doxorubicin Delivery
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical Conversion of Hardly Ionizable Rhenium Aryl Chlorocomplexes with p-Substituted Anilines
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploiting a New Approach to Destroy the Barrier of Tumor Microenvironment: Nano-Architecture Delivery Systems
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 26
Issue 11
10.3390/molecules26113428
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Advances of Cell Membrane Coated Nanoparticles in Treating Cardiovascular Disorders

by
Chaojie Zhu
1,2,3,†,
Junkai Ma
2,3,†,
Zhiheng Ji
2,3,
Jie Shen
4,* and
Qiwen Wang
1,*
1
Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
2
Chu Kochen Honors College, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
3
Institute of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
4
Department of Pharmacy, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou 310015, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contribute equally.
Molecules 2021, 26(11), 3428; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26113428
Submission received: 4 May 2021 / Revised: 30 May 2021 / Accepted: 3 June 2021 / Published: 5 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Nanomaterials in Biomedicine)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death worldwide, causing approximately 17.9 million deaths annually, an estimated 31% of all deaths, according to the WHO. CVDs are essentially rooted in atherosclerosis and are clinically classified into coronary heart disease, stroke and peripheral vascular disorders. Current clinical interventions include early diagnosis, the insertion of stents, and long-term preventive therapy. However, clinical diagnostic and therapeutic tools are subject to a number of limitations including, but not limited to, potential toxicity induced by contrast agents and unexpected bleeding caused by anti-platelet drugs. Nanomedicine has achieved great advancements in biomedical area. Among them, cell membrane coated nanoparticles, denoted as CMCNPs, have acquired enormous expectations due to their biomimetic properties. Such membrane coating technology not only helps avoid immune clearance, but also endows nanoparticles with diverse cellular and functional mimicry. In this review, we will describe the superiorities of CMCNPs in treating cardiovascular diseases and their potentials in optimizing current clinical managements.

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) surpasses cancer as the most common cause of mortality [1], contributing to almost 40% total deaths in China [2]. Conventional therapeutic options include medications embodying anticoagulants [3], antiplatelet [4], thrombolytic [5] and antilipemic agents [6], and surgery including vessel bypass grafting [7] and stent insertion [8,9]. Nonetheless, disease reoccurrences, which have been reported to be 50% for any CVD event or subsequent revascularization in the year after myocardial infarction [10], side effects, for example bleeding events (occurring in around 1-8%) induced by dual antiplatelet therapy in treating acute coronary heart syndrome [11], and a high frequency of adverse drug reactions (~20%) [12], remain challenging. This is especially true for small-molecule based agents, which are organic compounds influencing molecule pathways by targeting vital functional proteins displayed on blood vessels and the heart; off-target toxicities, systemic degradation, short half-life and low bioavailability hinder clinical treatment [13,14,15].
Nanotechnology has achieved great advancements in the biomedical field. Nanomaterials facilitate targeted small-molecule drug delivery to the specific lesion site, or they may sometimes perform as a pharmacological active compound per se due to their unique physical and chemical properties [16]. Nevertheless, without any surface modifications, these nanoplatforms are rapidly removed from circulation into the liver and spleen by the body’s reticuloendothelial system (RES), which severely hampers their therapeutic efficacy [17]. Nanomaterials surface PEGylation is the most extensive measurement taken to improve their biocompatibility and prolong the circulation time [18]. However, such a method has been associated with the potential toxicity effect of inducing hypersensitivity reactions which can provoke an anaphylactic shock [19]. Alternatively, cell membrane coating technology has been reported to elicit immune evasion and prolong nanocarriers’ circulation time. Furthermore, the functional proteins on the cloaked cell membranes render additional biological properties for nanoparticles, such as selective adherence, inflammatory site targeting and endothelium penetration [20]. In this review, we briefly introduce the pathogenesis, therapeutic targets and current clinical medications of several main cardiovascular diseases. Then, we will explain fundamental information about cell membrane coated nanoparticles, including their history, characteristics and synthetic routes. To elucidate the significance of CMCNPs, we describe the evolution of CVD treatments. Through highlighting the bottlenecks of clinical medications and conventional nanomedicine in chronological sequence, we demonstrate the superiority of CMCNPs in treating CVDs. In particular, we show that CMCNPs boast a number of unique therapeutic characteristics, such as their intrinsic capacity to target lesions. As far as we know, it is the first work that describes the evolution of CVDs treatments—from clinical medications, to conventional nanomedicine, and finally to CMCNPs, with a special focus on CMCNPs.

2. Cardiovascular Diseases

The cardiovascular system, or circulatory system, consisting of the heart and numerous vessels, is responsible for blood circulation in the body and crucial for oxygen, nutrition and cellular traffic. Behavioral risk factors such as smoking [21], hypertension [22], and diabetes [23] and biological risk factors such as age, gender [24], and family history [25], increase the prevalence of cardiovascular disease worldwide [26]. The main categories of CVDs include coronary heart disease, stroke and peripheral vascular disorders. These aforementioned CVDs are triggered by abnormal blood flow, either due to blood blockage or bleeding, the occurrence of which is essentially on account of atherosclerosis or thrombosis (Figure 1) [27]. Clinical measurements include early diagnosis, preventive care or surgical intervention. Despite these efforts to prevent and treat CVDs, progress has been moderate, and the annual total of CVD cases has seen a continuous increase in the last 30 years [28].

2.1. Mechanisms of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis

2.1.1. Atherosclerosis

Atherosclerosis (AS) is the most common cause of myocardial infarction and ischemia, which is featured by chronic inflammation. An intimate correlation has been reported between low-density lipoprotein (LDL), one of the five major groups of lipoprotein responsible for fat molecules transporting throughout the body in the extracellular water, and atherosclerosis [29]. Elevated levels of LDL upregulate the expression of endothelial cell adhesion molecules which can drive the infiltration of leukocytes into vessels through classical recruitment cascades [30]. Furthermore, the chemokines released from endothelial cells and activated macrophages recruit peripheral neutrophils and monocytes. In the late stage of the disease, monocytes recruited to the lesion continuously digest modified lipoprotein, differentiating into foam cells [31]. Proteases released by the apoptotic foam cells further destroy the thin endothelial cell layer which covers and protects the atherosclerotic plaque, eventually leading to plaque rupture and thrombus formation [32].

2.1.2. Thrombosis

Thrombosis is defined as the formation of a blood clot within the vascular system, which severely obstructs normal blood circulation and may eventually lead to myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke. Under normal conditions, endothelial cells will actively prevent the formation of thrombus through various factors which block platelet adhesion and aggregation, inhibit coagulation and lyse the clots. Three main abnormalities of circulation facilitate thrombus formation; endothelial injury, alterations in blood flow and hypercoagulation, collectively named “Virchow’s Triad” [33]. The clot formed during this process promotes hypoxia and inflammation at the lesion site, subsequently promoting the infiltration of activated immune cells. Lesional monocytes and macrophages express metalloproteinase (MMP), which can facilitate thrombus resolution. When unresolved, clots will induce ischemia-related cardiovascular diseases, such as lower limb ischemia and ischemic stroke [34].

2.2. Classifications of CVDs

Cardiovascular diseases can be mainly classified into three categories—including coronary heart disease, stroke and peripheral vascular disorders—based on the location of the injury. In the next section, the main risks, manifestations, and disease mechanisms will be discussed.

2.2.1. Coronary Heart Disease

Coronary heart disease, otherwise called ischemic heart disease, occurs due to insufficient blood flow to the heart and the necrosis of myocardial tissues induced by a lack of oxygen. In the early stages of the disease, a shortage of blood flow is mainly caused by atherosclerotic plaque obstruction. When the atherosclerotic plaque suddenly breaks off, it exposes its highly thrombotic components, consequently leading to thrombus formation. Thrombus formed during this process may completely obstruct the blood vessel through thrombo-embolism, which potentiates myocardial infarction [35,36].

2.2.2. Stroke

Stroke will occur when the supply of blood to the brain tissue is impacted. Strokes can be divided into two subtypes—ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke—based on their mechanism of formation. Hemorrhagic stroke, which makes up almost 13% of total clinical cases, is usually caused by hypertension, which results in intracranial hypertension and oxygen and nutrition depletion in the downstream tissues, rapidly inducing damage to the brain tissues [37]. On the other hand, atherosclerosis is the major cause of ischemic stroke. As a result, thrombus forms due to the local inflammation and ulceration of the fibrous plaques. The clot occludes the atherosclerotic vessel or travels further to block the brain’s arteries, causing ischemic stroke [38]. The resulting oxygen- and glucose-depleted environment downregulates junctional protein expression, which in turn facilitates the extravasation of proteins and leukocytes infiltration. Leukocytes, e.g., neutrophils, recruited to the brain lesion site during the acute inflammatory phase exacerbate inflammation through the generation of reactive oxygen species, worsening the disease condition [39,40].

2.2.3. Peripheral Vascular Disorders

Peripheral vascular disorder, or peripheral arterial disease, occurs in parts of the body other than the brain and heart, such as legs and arms, the major causes of which include atherosclerosis and thrombo-embolism. Narrowing lumens induce insufficient blood flow into the lesion site, leading to local ischemia, and eventually developing into intermittent claudication. Aggravating intermittent claudication may cause critical limb ischemia, and ultimately progress into acute limb ischemia when the blood flow is completely obstructed [41].

2.3. Clinical Management and Its Bottleneck

Before therapeutic intervention, appropriate diagnosis should be implemented. Current clinic diagnostic tools mainly include X-ray, doppler ultrasound, CT angiography and magnetic resonance imaging angiography. However, early stage diagnosis of atherosclerosis remains a major issue due to inadequate diagnostic clarity and clinical acumen. To facilitate early diagnosis of atherosclerosis, iodinated compounds and gadolinium are two representative contrast dyes applied for CT angiography and magnetic resonance imaging angiograph, respectively. Although these measurements have achieved success to a certain degree, the biosafety of contrast agents has aroused concerns. For example, iodinated compounds are limiting in those with hypersensitivity or significant renal dysfunction. Gadolinium can also be limiting due to its potential toxicity in inducing nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, which is a rare but unmanageable scleroderma like disease [42].
Apart from diagnosis, there are also hurdles for the management and prevention of cardiovascular diseases. For high-risk patients who have not yet experienced CVDs, long-term preventive medications, such as statins, are recommended. However, a lack of patient compliance hinders our fight against CVDs [43]. In addition, anticoagulant, thrombolysis and antiplatelet agents are clinically used to treat thrombo-embolism-related CVDs. Despite the efficacy of these drugs at impeding the process of plaque development and thrombus formation, they come with a significant risk of unexpected bleeding, for example coumarin, a vitamin K antagonist, is related to a risk of major bleeding that ranges from 2% to 13% during the mean duration of follow-up of 6 to 30 months [44]. Furthermore, the therapeutic dosage varies between patients and with disease stage. Last but not least, clinical strategies against acute ischemic stroke are mainly divided into intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy, both of which are time-critical and have extremely limited therapeutic time windows [45]. The performance of stents also encounters bottlenecks. Bare metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stents (DES) are two conventional classes applied in clinical settings. DES are platforms for delivering therapeutic molecules locally, which were developed to overcome several side effects associated with BMS, such as thrombosis and neointimal hyperplasia. Although DES exhibit efficacies in preventing restenosis and scar tissue formation to some extent, in-stent thrombosis due to inflammation or certain gradient on stents, for example polymers, is the main challenge [46]. Therefore, there remains an urgent need for better alternatives with improved diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy.

3. Nanomedicine against CVDs

Recent advancements achieved in nanomedicine exhibit great potential to improve off-target side effects, long-term toxicity and limited diagnostic or therapeutic efficacy [47]. For example, conventional use of stents are accompanied with risks of thrombosis and restenosis. Especially for DES, late stent thrombosis (>30 days) is a main challenge. Nanoparticles have been incorporated into stents’ formulations to modulate their drug releasing properties and achieve robust endothelial healing. Liu et al. developed advanced DES, which were composed of collagen and nitric oxide (NO) donor-loaded PLGA nanoparticles [48]. As a result, such platform alleviated intima formation and exhibited a sustained release capability of NO, which significantly reduced platelet aggregation in rabbit blood, thus mitigating thrombosis.
Conventional diagnostic contrast agents, such as gadopentetic, take effect through revealing the narrowing of the vessels, termed stenosis. In contrast, nano-based molecular contrast agent could directly disclose the location of atherosclerotic plaques through active targeting [49]. For example, Qiao et al. developed an osteopontin antibody conjugated upconversion nanoplatform to achieve noninvasive targeting and imaging of vulnerable plaques [50]. Morishige et al. reported dextran coated superparamagnetic nanoparticles, which exhibited affinity towards macrophages and could be utilized to assess macrophage burden in atherosclerosis, providing a useful tool for identifying inflamed plaques and monitoring disease conditions [51].
Nanoparticles have also achieved breathtaking therapeutic improvements. The current clinical prevention of atherosclerosis mainly relies on the long term oral administration of statins, with insignificant effects unless taking an extremely high dosage [52]. However, such high dosage will inevitably induce hepatoxicity and myopathy [53]. To address this predicament, Kim et al. reported a cargo-switching nanoparticles composed of a cyclodextrin shell component and simvastatin as a loaded drug to achieve higher affinity towards atherosclerotic lesion and plaque regression [54]. In another way, Flores et al. developed single walled carbon nanotubes loaded with a chemical inhibitor of the antiphagocytic CD47-SIRPα signaling axis. Such nanoplatforms exhibited macrophage-specific targeting ability and could reactivate lesional phagocytosis to effectively reduce plaque burden [55]. Reperfusion is vital for better prognosis in acute stroke. Marsh et al. reported fibrin-targeted perfluorocarbon nanoparticles, the surface of which is modified to deliver the plasminogen activator streptokinase, a thrombolytic agent. Such a nanoplatform exhibited an improved clot-targeting ability with a lower risk of adverse hemorrhagic events [56].
However, these strategies still face the problem of fast clearance by RES. Better therapeutic or diagnostic capabilities can be obtained via prolonging their circulation. In addition, the targeting abilities of these platforms usually rely on peptide or protein (antibody) conjugation. Many factors limit their biofunctions and targeting abilities, for example, proteases in circulation in the body may interact with them, thus depriving them of their functions [57]. Alternative solutions are needed to address these drawbacks.

4. Cell Membrane Coated Nanoparticle and Its Applications in CVDs

Cell membrane coating technology, an alternative surface passivation method substituting for PEGylation, generally exploits innate cell membranes to coat synthetic nanoparticles. Such a coating measurement helps to disguise nanoparticles as some of the body’s intrinsic cells, which not only assists them in avoiding the body’s immune clearance, thus prolonging their circulation (higher biocompatibility), but also endows them with various cell-like biofunctions via the diverse functional membrane proteins on CMCNPs’ surface (cell-mimicking properties).

4.1. Cell Membrane Coated Nanoparticles

Cell membrane cloaking technology was first achieved by Hu et al. who applied red blood cells’ membranes to coat poly-(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) nanoparticles, successfully prolonging their circulation by up to 72 h [58]. Considerable research has been conducted to expand cell membranes sources, inner nanoparticles and synthetic routes. Generally, this technique is divided into three procedures to synthesize cell membrane coated nanoparticles: cell membrane extraction, inner core nanoparticle preparation and the fusion process (Figure 2) [59].

4.1.1. Cell Membrane Extraction

Cell membranes are mainly composed of phospholipids and diverse functional proteins [60]. The membrane plays a vital role in dividing cell types, cells’ intercommunications, signal transduction and cargo selective permeability. Current procedures of cell membrane extraction include membrane lysis and purification [61]. Generally, interested cells are first isolated from whole blood. Following hypotonic treatment for cell lysis, discontinuous sucrose gradient centrifugations are implemented to remove the nucleic and cytoplasmic contents. Further purifications are carried out through washing with specific buffers and extrusion through porous polycarbonate membrane to obtain the purified extracted cell membranes [62].

4.1.2. Core Preparation

A number of novel nanocarriers have emerged (Table 1), e.g., liposomes [62,63], gold nanoparticles [64], mesoporous silica nanoparticles [65,66], iron oxide nanoparticles[67,68], black phosphorous [69,70,71], PLGA nanoparticles [58,72], and layered double hydroxide [73]. These nanocarriers can either act as drug delivery platforms or as active components in themselves due to their intrinsic physical and chemical properties. For example, black phosphorous 2D nanosheets can be used in photothermal therapy due to its efficient photothermal conversion property [71]. Layered double hydroxide can not only perform as lipid regulator to treat CVDs [74], but can also serve as an immune adjuvant and antigen carrier bi-functional nanoplatform in cancer immunotherapy [75]. To achieve various biological functions, e.g., magnetic resonance imaging, drug carrying or reactive oxygen species scavenging, appropriate inner nanoparticle selection is essential to fulfill the therapeutic potential of cell membrane coated nanoparticles.

4.1.3. Fusion Process

The fusion process covers the inner core nanoparticles with the extracted and purified cell membranes. Generally, this process is divided into two main approaches: membrane extrusion or sonication bath. The membrane extrusion process is achieved through mixing the cell membrane vesicles and inner nanoparticles and extruding them through porous polycarbonate membranes for several repeated cycles. This method is mainly applied for small-scale production, which is suitable for laboratory use [77]. A sonication bath is a route providing higher yields but requires strictly controlled sonication power. Excessively high temperatures will denature the functional proteins on the obtained cell membrane vesicles, which severely impacts their biological performance. In addition, core–membrane nanoparticles produced through sonication methods exhibit poor size uniformity [78]. Therefore, new strategies are urgently needed with higher production efficiency, improved particle uniformity and valid membrane protein functions.

4.2. Cell Membrane Coated Nanoparticles in Treating Cardiovascular Disease

Cell membrane coated nanoparticles are expected to exhibit some intrinsic cell properties, e.g., specific targeting to inflammatory site, immune evasion, binding affinity to targeted receptors or cells (Table 2). In dealing with cardiovascular diseases, CMCNPs are exploited to mimic peripheral cells, such as erythrocytes [79], platelets [80], or immune cells [81], which have been reported to exhibit a crucial role in disease progression. In the following section, cell membrane coated nanoparticles will be discussed based on the context of their sources and their potential for treating CVDs.

4.2.1. Erythrocytes Cell Membranes

Erythrocytes (or red-blood cells, RBC) are the most abundant cells in the human body, taking the responsibility of oxygen and carbon dioxide transport. Mechanistically, healthy erythrocytes can evade the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) through surface membrane protein CD47, which act as “do not eat me” signals to immune cells [91]. Therefore, erythrocytes membranes are intrinsically biocompatible and nonimmunogenic, so they can be utilized to prolong the circulation time of nanoparticles. Apart from this, RBC membrane coated nanoparticles are also explored to act as biomimetic nanosponges for detoxification [92], or serve as nanotoxoids for safe and effective toxin nanovaccination [93].
As mentioned above, Zhang et al. were the first to apply erythrocyte membrane coating on PLGA nanoparticles [58]. In their study, the RBC membrane was extracted through hypotonic medium hemolysis and fused with PLGA nanoparticles to obtain RBC membrane camouflaged NPs (RBC-NPs), with an 80 nm average diameter (Figure 3A). They further proved that the RBC membrane proteins were successfully transferred onto PLGA nanoparticles (Figure 3B). Additionally, RBC membrane coated nanoparticles exhibited outstanding stability in vitro, maintaining its core-shell structure even after 6 h co-incubation with HeLa (Figure 3C). As a result, such a nanoplatform exhibits an outstanding ability to avoid immune clearance, greatly prolonging its circulation time (Figure 3D). Due to its long circulation time, this nanostructure could serve as a universally effective drug delivery platform against CVDs when suitable small-molecule agents are loaded in the inner PLGA core. For example, Wang et al. reported rapamycin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles, which were cloaked with RBC membranes (RBC/RAP@PLGA). As a result, this nanoplatform effectively attenuated the progression of atherosclerosis, in which the average area ration of plaque to vascular lumen decreased from 47.95% to 31.34% after treatment, superior to the free drug group (from 47.95% to 42.42%) [94].
Alternatively, Shao et al. prepared a Janus-type polymeric micromotors (JPMs), composed of heparin (Hep) and chitosan (CHI), coated with RBC membrane [95]. This functional nanoparticle achieved efficient motion toward the thrombus in response to near-infrared (NIR) irradiation via thermal effects and could synergize with photothermal therapy for thrombus alleviation.
The nanoplatforms discussed above mainly utilize the biggest advantage of red blood cell membrane: biocompatibility and immune evasion. Commonly, RBC membranes are coated on drug-loaded PLGA nanoparticles to achieve better drug on-target delivery against cardiovascular diseases.

4.2.2. Platelet Membrane

Platelets are small anucleated blood cells engaged in the blood clotting process. Upon hemorrhage, platelets rapidly migrate to the damaged lesion to form a clot and prevent excessive bleeding. Platelets are the connectors between thrombosis, inflammation and atherosclerosis. When atherosclerotic plaque rupture, vascular injury and decelerated blood flow facilitate platelet activation and binding to the injured vascular wall, eventually leading to thrombus formation [96]. Nanoparticles coated with platelet membrane can exhibit many similar characteristics to platelets, for example, adherence to injured vasculature.
Inspired by this, Zhang et al. firstly developed platelet membrane coated PLGA nanoparticles, which exhibited selective adhesion to damaged human and rodent vasculature and MRSA252 [78]. These platelet membrane coated nanoformulations could be utilized to treat thrombus, arterial injuries and sepsis with appropriate loading agents in the inner PLGA core. For example, when dealing with thrombus, Wang et al. synthesized platelet membrane coated PLGA nanoparticles, loaded with lumbrokinase, a conventional anticoagulant agent (PNPs/LBK) [97]. As a result, PNP/LBK exhibits better thrombus targeting ability with lower hemorrhagic risks.
When thrombus occurs, insufficient blood flow lead to a hypoxic environment that promotes reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and tissue damage in the lesion site. Inspired by this, Zhao et al. recently developed H2O2-responsive platelet membrane cloaked argatroban-loaded polymeric nanoparticles (PNPArg) to treat thrombus [98]. In their strategy, the inner core, Poly(vanillyl alcohol-co-oxalate) (PVAX), is a H2O2 degradable polymer that can scavenge excessive ROS and could synergize with argatroban, an anticoagulant agent, showing great therapeutic effects toward various thrombotic diseases.
CMCNPs can also serve as novel diagnostic tools. Ma et al. prepared a platelet membrane coated nanoconstruct (PM-PAAO-UCNPs), which consists of upconversion nanoparticles and Ce6 photosensitizer for accurate localization and non-invasive photodynamic therapy of atherosclerosis [99]. In their study, the platelet membrane coating strategy effectively increased the binding affinity of nanoparticles to foam cells, the features of which include unregulated lipid metabolism, and play a central role throughout the disease stages. Near-infrared light was then applied to induce ROS-mediated apoptosis and regulated metabolism of foam cells to treat atherosclerosis.
Apart from targeting vascular endothelial cells and foam cells, platelets also exhibit binding affinity towards activated neutrophils. During acute ischemic stroke (AIS), neutrophils migrate into cerebral ischemic regions with the aid of platelets. Recruited neutrophils release reactive oxygen species, which are the prime cause of reperfusion injury following AIS [100,101]. Studies have shown potential curative benefits through alleviating the infiltration of neutrophils [102]. Inspired by these findings, Tang et al. innovatively constructed a platelet membrane coated PLGA nanoplatform with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles and piceatannol loaded (PTNPs) (Figure 4A) [103]. In their study, the coated platelet membranes facilitated binding between nanoparticles and neutrophils through the recognition of P-selectin (platelet) and PSGL-1 (neutrophil). The internalized nanoconstructs then released piceatannol, which alleviated neutrophils’ infiltrations in the cerebral ischemic regions (Figure 4B). As a result, PTNPs significantly decreased the infarct volume of mice by approximately 26.2% compared with the group treated with PLGA nanoparticles containing piceatannol and superparamagnetic iron oxide.
Overall, platelet membrane coated nanoparticles have been extensively researched for thrombus, injured vessels and immune cell targeting to achieve higher on-target payload delivery and lower off-target side effects.

4.2.3. Macrophage Membrane

Macrophages are specialized cells responsible for the detection, phagocytosis and destruction of “invaders”. Recent reviews have discovered the central role of macrophages in various cardiovascular-related processes including atherosclerotic coronary artery, post myocardial infarction remodeling and cardiac regeneration [104,105]. The macrophage membrane coating strategy is extensively applied to elevate tumor targeting ability through the driving force of CCR2-CCL2 axis, which could also be used to target inflammatory lesion sites [106,107].
Inspired by this, Gao et al. successfully utilized macrophage-derived membranes to coat nanoparticles and achieved enhanced therapeutic efficacy in atherosclerosis treatment [108]. In their study, they produced a ROS-responsive inner core to achieve burst release of the drug. The macrophage membrane coating strategy not only facilitates nanoparticles’ evasion of the monocyte phagocyte system (MPS) but also helps targeted delivery to the lesion, where the inner drug is rapidly released due to the oxidative environment of atherosclerosis. In addition, macrophage membranes can sequester proinflammatory cytokines, which could restrict local inflammation. A combination of pharmacotherapy and inflammatory cytokine clearance can significantly improve the therapeutic efficacy against atherosclerosis. Utilizing macrophage membranes’ intrinsic tendency toward atherosclerotic plaque, Wang et al. similarly constructed a macrophage membrane coated PLGA nanoplatform with anti-inflammation agent Rapamycin (RAP) loaded [109]. As a result, such nanoplatform exhibited outstanding therapeutic efficacy, in which lipid deposition in plaques were reduced from 36.45% to 17.41%, which was superior to free RAP group (from 36.45% to 31.54%).
Additionally, applying cytokine neutralization strategy, Xue et al. innovatively constructed a macrophage membrane enveloped NPs encapsulating anti-myocardial infarction (MI) agent miR-199a-3 (MMNPmiR199a-3p) to manage MI [110]. In the study, they bioengineered macrophages to achieve enhanced expression of IL-1βR, IL-6R and TNF-αR. As a result, MMNPmiR199a-3p exhibits efficient uptake by myocardial cells and effective inhibition of inflammatory response through inflammatory cytokines neutralization.
Conclusively, inflammatory lesion site targeting ability and cytokine neutralization capacity are the most common usage of macrophage membrane in treating CVDs.

4.2.4. Neutrophil Membrane

As mentioned above, neutrophils can sense and move to the inflammatory body site. Such inflammatory chemotaxis capability has been exploited to enhance drug on-target delivery. For example, Xue et al. achieved effective delivery of paclitaxel (PTX)-contained liposomes to the inflamed post-resection lesion sites mediated by neutrophils, resulting in suppressed glioma reoccurrence [111]. In addition, the feasibility of utilizing neutrophil-derived membranes to target the inflamed lesion has also been proven in rheumatoid arthritis [112].
At the inflamed lesion site, neutrophils are activated and subsequently release reactive oxygen species, bioactive lipid mediators and neutrophils extracellular traps (NETs), which induce inflammatory damage. Many cardiovascular therapies are based on targeting neutrophils, either through blocking neutrophils’ infiltration or preventing NET-driven inflammation [39].
Inspired by this, Dong et al. developed neutrophil membrane-derived nanovesicles containing Resolvin D2 (RvD2), an anti-inflammation agent, to treat postischemic stroke brain injury through inhibiting endothelial activation, cytokine release and the infiltration of neutrophils into the cerebral ischemic lesion [113].
In addition, Feng et al. also successfully constructed a neutrophil-mimic membrane coated mesoporous Prussian blue nanozyme (MPBzyme@NCM) (Figure 5A) [114]. In their study, MPBzyme@NCM exhibits active targeting ability to the inflamed brain microvascular endothelial cells, where nanoparticles are then phagocytosed by microglia and subsequently scavenge ROS through MPBzyme. As a result, this nanoplatform can promote microglia polarizing to M2 and reduce the neutrophils recruitment (Figure 5B), exhibiting prospective therapeutic efficacy against ischemic stroke.
In conclusion, the mainstream usage of neutrophil membrane against CVDs still focused on its inflammatory-lesion targeting ability. Further research is needed to explore other biomedical applications of neutrophil-derived membranes, such as cytokine neutralization.

4.2.5. Stem Cell Membrane

The ischemic tissue-directed homing ability of mesenchymal stem cells has been reported. This process is mediated by the interaction of chemokine receptors on the surface of neural stem cells (NSCs) and their ligands enriched in the ischemic microenvironment such as SDF-1/CXCR4 axis [115,116]. Bose et al. first bioengineered human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs) through mRNA vector transduction to overexpress CXCR4 [117]. This engineered stem cell membranes were then coated on the PLGA nanoparticles with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) loaded to achieve better endothelial cell barrier penetration and increase retention time in ischemic tissues. As a result, this nanoplatform significantly improved therapeutic outcomes, achieving a lower risk of limb loss (17%) compared with the untreated group (83%).
To further improve the targeting ability, Kim et al. recently developed mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived magnetic extracellular nanovesicles to treat ischemic stroke [118]. In their study, iron oxide nanoparticles were first co-incubated with MSC to elevate its expression of therapeutic growth factor. The whole MSCs were then extruded through serial membrane filters and purified to obtain magnetic nanovesicles (MNV). Overall, MNV enhanced lesion targeting ability through magnetic attraction and improved therapeutic efficacy against ischemic stroke.

5. Conclusions and Prospects

Ever since RBC membrane coating technology was first reported, countless investigations have been implemented to explore its therapeutic and diagnostic potential, for example in cancer therapy [119,120]. As mentioned in this review, various cell membranes are applied to prolong circulation time and endow nanoparticles with active targeting properties and inflammatory cytokines neutralization activity to treat CVDs (related studies have been integrated in Table 3).
However, we still lack a basic understanding of complex cell membrane properties. An inappropriate selection of blood type induces hemolysis during blood transfusion, which is attributed to the activation of the host immune system [121]. Therefore, autologous cells should be taken into prior consideration. Current studies on CMCNPs’ biomedical applications remain at the laboratory research stage, as most studies have been carried out in mice. With no current clinical usage of CMCNPs, investigations on their biosafety need to be implemented to accelerate their clinical translation.
Apart from biosafety issues, comprehensive studies on pharmacokinetics and cellular uptake of small molecule loaded CMCNPs need to be implemented. As various cell membranes and inner nanoparticles are involved in the synthetic procedure of CMCNPs, the impacts of membrane types and inner nanoparticles’ physical and chemical properties on the drug release ability of small molecules and cellular uptake of CMCNPs should be investigated extensively to facilitate their clinical translation.
The feasibility of large-scale production of CMCNPs is another barrier hindering their clinical translation. As aforementioned, membrane extrusion and sonication baths are two major routes to synthesize CMCNPs. However, these two approaches have distinctive strengths and weakness. For example, membrane extrusion is characterized with high uniformity but low-production efficiency, while the sonication method has contrary results. A better synthetic route is needed to overcome this obstacle.
Table
Table 3. Cell membrane coated nanomedicine applied in treating cardiovascular diseases.
Table 3. Cell membrane coated nanomedicine applied in treating cardiovascular diseases.
Target DiseaseStructure (Membrane/Inner Core)Membrane SourceEfficacyRef.
AtherosclerosisRBC/PLGAC57BL/6 Mice(1) Enhanced accumulation in atherosclerotic plaques
(2) Higher drug on-target release		[94]
Platelet/UCNPHealthy ApoE−/- Mice(1) Specific targeting to foam cells
(2) Photodynamic therapy induced apoptosis and regulated lipid metabolism		[99]
Platelet/PLGAHuman Type O− Blood(1) Avoid severe systematic toxicity of rapamycin
(2) Enhanced 4.98-fold greater radiant efficiency than control nanoparticle group		[122]
Macrophage/ROS-responsive coreRAW264.7 Cells(1) Avoid immune clearance
(2) ROS-responsive drug release
(3) Inflammatory cytokine sequestration		[108]
Macrophage/PLGARAW264.7 Cells(1) Effectively inhibit phagocytosis by macrophages
(2) Target and accumulate in atherosclerotic lesion		[109]
ThrombusRBC/Janus-type NPsBalb/c, Male(1) Achieve movement through self-thermophoresis effect
(2) RBC Membrane facilitate efficient movement in relevant biological environment		[95]
Platelet/PLGAICR Mice(1) Affinity between platelet membrane and thrombus
(2) Lower the risks of adverse effect on the function of coagulation system		[97]
Platelet/H2O2-degradable NPsHuman Type O− Blood(1) Thrombus homing ability of platelet membrane
(2) H2O2 scavenging ability of inner polymer core
(3) H2O2 responsive drug release ability		[98]
Ischemic myocardiumRBC/Mesoporous iron NPsMale Sprague Dawley Rats(1) Excellent biocompatibility
(2) Extended circulatory time
(3) Controlled-release of H2S		[123]
Macrophage/miR199a-3pRAW264.7 Cells(1) Inflammatory cytokine sequestration
(2) Gene delivery		[110]
Platelet/IONPC57BL/6 Mice(1) Specific targeting to inflammatory neutrophils
(2) Alleviate infiltrations of neutrophils into hypoxic lesion
(3) Disease stage monitoring and nanoparticles localization through MRI		[103]
Ischemic strokePlatelet/γ-Fe2O3 magnetic NPsBlood Center(1) Combination targeting ability of platelet membrane and magnetic forces
(2) Disease stage monitoring and nanoparticles localization through MRI		[124]
Neutrophil/MPBzymeHL-60 Cells(1) Reduction of neutrophils’ recruitment
(2) Microglia polarization from M1 to M2
(3) Decreased apoptosis of neurons
(4) Facilitate neuronal cells proliferation		[114]
Stem cell/PLGAC57BL/6 Mice(1) Specific targeting ability toward ischemic microenvironment via stem cell membrane coating
(2) Significantly augmented the efficacy of glyburide, an antiedema agent, for stroke treatment		[125]
Hindlimb ischemiaStem cell/PLGAPatients(1) Bioengineered stem cell membrane coating for improved ischemic lesion targeting ability
(2) Avoid macrophages phagocytosis		[117]
Stem cell/IONPHuman Bone Marrow(1) Stem cell preincubated with IONPs to elevate expression of therapeutic factors
(2) Magnetic navigation improved the ischemic-lesion targeting		[118]
On the other hand, challenges and opportunities coexist in this field. Many alternative membrane options are under investigation, such as cancer cells [66,87], bacteria [89,90] and even hybrid cell membrane vesicles [89,126]. For example, Gu et al. successfully fabricated “Nano-Ag@erythrosome” nanocomplexs by fusing red blood cell membranes and cancer cell membranes [127]. Such nanocomplexes can effectively target the spleen due to the property of senescent red blood cell membrane, and induce antigen presentation on antigen presenting cells (APCs) to activate an antitumor immune response. Further research may well grasp this strategy and further modify this method by adjusting the adding ratio of different membrane sources to achieve elevated targeting efficiency and improved therapeutic efficacy against cardiovascular diseases [128].
Furthermore, recent research has reported a selective organ targeting (SORT) system for specific tissue mRNA delivery by introducing different SORT lipid into lipid nanoparticles through a bottom-up chemical synthesis method [129]. A combination of bottom-up and top-down CMCNPs synthesizing strategies exhibits great promise in extending their biofunctions and broadening their biomedical applications. Apart from this, lipid insertion, metabolic substrates engineering and genetic modification are other conventional membrane engineering methods, which also exhibit promise to extend the biofunctions of the derived cell membranes and have already been summarized extensively elsewhere [130,131,132,133]. In general, these abovementioned measurements, which aim to expand the biomedical application of CMCNPs, are all based on membrane engineering. The appropriate combination of inner functional nanoparticles with selected and modified outer-membranes will significantly enhance the therapeutic efficacies of CMCNPs. Overall, more innovative strategies will be explored in the future to unlock a new stage for cell membrane coated nanoparticles to treat cardiovascular diseases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.Z., J.S. and Q.W.; methodology, C.Z. and Z.J.; validation, C.Z. and Q.W.; investigation, C.Z. and J.M.; writing—original draft preparation, C.Z. and J.M.; writing—review and editing, C.Z. and J.M.; supervision, C.Z., J.S. and Q.W.; funding acquisition, Q.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81800442).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for grants received from the National Natural Science Foundation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Wang, H.; Naghavi, M.; Allen, C.; Barber, R.M.; Bhutta, Z.A.; Carter, A.; Casey, D.C.; Charlson, F.J.; Chen, A.Z.; Coates, M.M.; et al. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet 2016, 388, 1459–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Zhou, M.; Wang, H.; Zhu, J.; Chen, W.; Wang, L.; Liu, S.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; Yin, P.; et al. Cause-specific mortality for 240 causes in china during 1990–2013: A systematic subnational analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet 2016, 387, 251–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Makaryus, J.; Halperin, J.; Lau, J. Oral anticoagulants in the management of venous thromboembolism. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2013, 10, 397–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Michelson, A.D. Antiplatelet therapies for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9, 154–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lansberg, M.G.; O’Donnell, M.J.; Khatri, P.; Lang, E.S.; Nguyen-Huynh, M.N.; Schwartz, N.E.; Sonnenberg, F.A.; Schulman, S.; Vandvik, P.O.; Spencer, F.A.; et al. Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke: Antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012, 141 (Suppl. S2), e601S–e636S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Adhyaru, B.B.; Jacobson, T.A. Safety and efficacy of statin therapy. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2018, 15, 757–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Cappelletto, A.; Zacchigna, S. Cardiac revascularization: State of the art and perspectives. Vasc. Biol. 2019, 1, H47–H51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Byrne, R.A.; Joner, M.; Alfonso, F.; Kastrati, A. Drug-coated balloon therapy in coronary and peripheral artery disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2014, 11, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. McKavanagh, P.; Zawadowski, G.; Ahmed, N.; Kutryk, M. The evolution of coronary stents. Expert Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2018, 16, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bansilal, S.; Castellano, J.M.; Fuster, V. Global burden of CVD: Focus on secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Int. J. Cardiol. 2015, 201, S1–S7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Tersalvi, G.; Biasco, L.; Cioffi, G.M.; Pedrazzini, G. Acute coronary syndrome, antiplatelet therapy, and bleeding: A clinical perspective. JCM 2020, 9, 2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mohebbi, N.; Shalviri, G.; Salarifar, M.; Salamzadeh, J.; Gholami, K. Adverse drug reactions induced by cardiovascular drugs in cardiovascular care unit patients: Adverse drug reactions induced by cardiovascular drugs. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2010, 19, 889–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Oza, R.; Rundell, K.; Garcellano, M. Recurrent ischemic stroke: Strategies for prevention. Am. Fam. Physician 2017, 96, 436–440. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dai, Y.; Ge, J. Clinical use of aspirin in treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease. Thrombosis 2012, 2012, 245037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Guthrie, R. Review and management of side effects associated with antiplatelet therapy for prevention of recurrent cerebrovascular events. Adv. Ther. 2011, 28, 473–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mitchell, M.J.; Billingsley, M.M.; Haley, R.M.; Wechsler, M.E.; Peppas, N.A.; Langer, R. Engineering precision nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021, 20, 101–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gustafson, H.H.; Holt-Casper, D.; Grainger, D.W.; Ghandehari, H. Nanoparticle uptake: The phagocyte problem. Nano Today 2015, 10, 487–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Fam, S.Y.; Chee, C.F.; Yong, C.Y.; Ho, K.L.; Mariatulqabtiah, A.R.; Tan, W.S. Stealth coating of nanoparticles in drug-delivery systems. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Knop, K.; Hoogenboom, R.; Fischer, D.; Schubert, U.S. Poly (Ethylene Glycol) in drug delivery: Pros and cons as well as potential alternatives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6288–6308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, Z.; Wang, Z.; Gu, Z. Bioinspired and biomimetic nanomedicines. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Keto, J.; Ventola, H.; Jokelainen, J.; Linden, K.; Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi, S.; Timonen, M.; Ylisaukko-oja, T.; Auvinen, J. Cardiovascular disease risk factors in relation to smoking behaviour and history: A population-based cohort study. Open Heart 2016, 3, e000358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Fuchs, F.D.; Whelton, P.K. High blood pressure and cardiovascular disease. Hypertension 2020, 75, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Leon, B.M. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease: Epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatment recommendations and future research. WJD 2015, 6, 1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rodgers, J.L.; Jones, J.; Bolleddu, S.I.; Vanthenapalli, S.; Rodgers, L.E.; Shah, K.; Karia, K.; Panguluri, S.K. cardiovascular risks associated with gender and aging. JCDD 2019, 6, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Valerio, L.; Peters, R.J.; Zwinderman, A.H.; Pinto-Sietsma, S. Association of family history with cardiovascular disease in hypertensive individuals in a multiethnic population. JAHA 2016, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Van Camp, G. Cardiovascular disease prevention. Acta Clin. Belg. 2014, 69, 407–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bentzon, J.F.; Otsuka, F.; Virmani, R.; Falk, E. Mechanisms of plaque formation and rupture. Circ. Res. 2014, 114, 1852–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhao, D.; Liu, J.; Wang, M.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, M. Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in China: Current features and implications. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2019, 16, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Falk, E. Pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006, 47, C7–C12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Verna, L.; Ganda, C.; Stemerman, M.B. In vivo low-density lipoprotein exposure induces intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 correlated with activator protein-1 expression. ATVB 2006, 26, 1344–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Moore, K.J.; Sheedy, F.J.; Fisher, E.A. Macrophages in atherosclerosis: A dynamic balance. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13, 709–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Shah, P.K. Mechanisms of plaque vulnerability and rupture. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2003, 41 (Suppl. S4), 15S–22S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Esmon, C.T. Basic mechanisms and pathogenesis of venous thrombosis. Blood Rev. 2009, 23, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Mackman, N. Triggers, targets and treatments for thrombosis. Nature 2008, 451, 914–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Badimon, L.; Padró, T.; Vilahur, G. Atherosclerosis, platelets and thrombosis in acute ischaemic heart disease. Eur. Heart J. Acute Cardiovasc. Care 2012, 1, 60–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Asada, Y.; Yamashita, A.; Sato, Y.; Hatakeyama, K. Thrombus formation and propagation in the onset of cardiovascular events. J Atheroscler. Thromb. 2018, 25, 653–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Writing Group Members; Rosamond, W.; Flegal, K.; Furie, K.; Go, A.; Greenlund, K.; Haase, N.; Hailpern, S.M.; Ho, M.; Howard, V.; et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2008 update: A report from the american heart association statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee. Circulation 2008, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Lyaker, M.; Tulman, D.; Dimitrova, G.; Pin, R.; Papadimos, T. Arterial embolism. Int. J. Crit. Illn. Inj. Sci. 2013, 3, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Németh, T.; Sperandio, M.; Mócsai, A. Neutrophils as emerging therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2020, 19, 253–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, Q.; Wang, Q.; Zhu, J.; Xiao, Q.; Zhang, L. Reactive oxygen species: Key regulators in vascular health and diseases: ROS in vascular diseases. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2018, 175, 1279–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bloom, B.S.; Banta, H.D.; Gross, P.F.; Peña-Mohr, J.; Sisk, J.E.; Stocking, B. The Swedish council on technology assessment in health care. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 1989, 5, 154–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nelson, A.J.; Ardissino, M.; Psaltis, P.J. Current approach to the diagnosis of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease: More questions than answers. Ther. Adv. Chronic Dis. 2019, 10, 204062231988481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Fung, V.; Graetz, I.; Reed, M.; Jaffe, M.G. Patient-reported adherence to statin therapy, barriers to adherence, and perceptions of cardiovascular risk. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0191817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Crowther, M.A.; Warkentin, T.E. Bleeding risk and the management of bleeding complications in patients undergoing anticoagulant therapy: Focus on new anticoagulant agents. Blood 2008, 111, 4871–4879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Wolberg, A.S.; Rosendaal, F.R.; Weitz, J.I.; Jaffer, I.H.; Agnelli, G.; Baglin, T.; Mackman, N. Venous thrombosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2015, 1, 15006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bagheri, M.; Mohammadi, M.; Steele, T.W.; Ramezani, M. Nanomaterial coatings applied on stent surfaces. Nanomedicine 2016, 11, 1309–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Patra, J.K.; Das, G.; Fraceto, L.F.; Campos, E.V.R.; del Pilar Rodriguez-Torres, M.; Acosta-Torres, L.S.; Diaz-Torres, L.A.; Grillo, R.; Swamy, M.K.; Sharma, S.; et al. Nano based drug delivery systems: Recent developments and future prospects. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 16, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Liu, Y.; Wang, W.; Acharya, G.; Shim, Y.-B.; Choe, E.S.; Lee, C.H. Advanced stent coating for drug delivery and in vivo biocompatibility. J. Nanopart. Res. 2013, 15, 1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Palekar, R.U.; Jallouk, A.P.; Lanza, G.M.; Pan, H.; Wickline, S.A. Molecular imaging of atherosclerosis with nanoparticle-based fluorinated MRI contrast agents. Nanomedicine 2015, 10, 1817–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Qiao, R.; Qiao, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chi, C.; Tian, J.; Zhang, L.; Cao, F.; Gao, M. Molecular imaging of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques in vivo with osteopontin-specific upconversion nanoprobes. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 1816–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Morishige, K.; Kacher, D.F.; Libby, P.; Josephson, L.; Ganz, P.; Weissleder, R.; Aikawa, M. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging enhanced with superparamagnetic nanoparticles measures macrophage burden in atherosclerosis. Circulation 2010, 122, 1707–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Sparrow, C.P.; Burton, C.A.; Hernandez, M.; Mundt, S.; Hassing, H.; Patel, S.; Rosa, R.; Hermanowski-Vosatka, A.; Wang, P.R.; Zhang, D.; et al. Simvastatin has anti-inflammatory and antiatherosclerotic activities independent of plasma cholesterol lowering. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2001, 21, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Armitage, J. The safety of statins in clinical practice. Lancet 2007, 370, 1781–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kim, H.; Kumar, S.; Kang, D.-W.; Jo, H.; Park, J.-H. Affinity-driven design of cargo-switching nanoparticles to leverage a cholesterol-rich microenvironment for atherosclerosis therapy. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 6519–6531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Flores, A.M.; Hosseini-Nassab, N.; Jarr, K.-U.; Ye, J.; Zhu, X.; Wirka, R.; Koh, A.L.; Tsantilas, P.; Wang, Y.; Nanda, V.; et al. Pro-efferocytic nanoparticles are specifically taken up by lesional macrophages and prevent atherosclerosis. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2020, 15, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Marsh, J.; Senpan, A.; Hu, G.; Scott, M.; Gaffney, P.; Wickline, S.; Lanza, G. Fibrin-targeted perfluorocarbon nanoparticles for targeted thrombolysis. Nanomedicine 2007, 2, 533–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Spicer, C.D.; Jumeaux, C.; Gupta, B.; Stevens, M.M. Peptide and protein nanoparticle conjugates: Versatile platforms for biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 3574–3620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Hu, C.-M.J.; Zhang, L.; Aryal, S.; Cheung, C.; Fang, R.H.; Zhang, L. Erythrocyte membrane-camouflaged polymeric nanoparticles as a biomimetic delivery platform. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 10980–10985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Zou, S.; Wang, B.; Wang, C.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, L. Cell membrane-coated nanoparticles: Research advances. Nanomedicine 2020, 15, 625–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Simons, K.; Ikonen, E. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature 1997, 387, 569–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Zhai, Y.; Su, J.; Ran, W.; Zhang, P.; Yin, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, H.; Li, Y. Preparation and application of cell membrane-camouflaged nanoparticles for cancer therapy. Theranostics 2017, 7, 2575–2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Cao, H.; Dan, Z.; He, X.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, H.; Yin, Q.; Li, Y. Liposomes coated with isolated macrophage membrane can target lung metastasis of breast cancer. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 7738–7748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Liu, X.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, W.; Yang, Z.; Gan, Z.; Yu, C.; Tao, R.; Chen, H. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of liposomes modified with polypeptides and red cell membrane as a novel drug delivery system for myocardium targeting. Drug Deliv. 2020, 27, 599–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Hu, X.; Li, H.; Huang, X.; Zhu, Z.; Zhu, H.; Gao, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Chen, H. Cell membrane-coated gold nanoparticles for apoptosis imaging in living cells based on fluorescent determination. Microchim. Acta 2020, 187, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Peng, H.; Xu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Feng, N.; Yang, W.; Tang, J. Biomimetic mesoporous silica nanoparticles for enhanced blood circulation and cancer therapy. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2020, 3, 7849–7857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Cai, D.; Liu, L.; Han, C.; Ma, X.; Qian, J.; Zhou, J.; Zhu, W. Cancer cell membrane-coated mesoporous silica loaded with superparamagnetic ferroferric oxide and paclitaxel for the combination of chemo/magnetocaloric therapy on MDA-MB-231 cells. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 14475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Meng, Q.-F.; Rao, L.; Zan, M.; Chen, M.; Yu, G.-T.; Wei, X.; Wu, Z.; Sun, Y.; Guo, S.-S.; Zhao, X.-Z.; et al. Macrophage membrane-coated iron oxide nanoparticles for enhanced photothermal tumor therapy. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 134004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sherwood, J.; Sowell, J.; Beyer, N.; Irvin, J.; Stephen, C.; Antone, A.J.; Bao, Y.; Ciesla, L.M. Cell-membrane coated iron oxide nanoparticles for isolation and specific identification of drug leads from complex matrices. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 6352–6359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Liang, X.; Ye, X.; Wang, C.; Xing, C.; Miao, Q.; Xie, Z.; Chen, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, H.; Mei, L. Photothermal cancer immunotherapy by erythrocyte membrane-coated black phosphorus formulation. J. Control. Release 2019, 296, 150–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Su, Y.; Wang, T.; Su, Y.; Li, M.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, W.; Wang, W. A neutrophil membrane-functionalized black phosphorus riding inflammatory signal for positive feedback and multimode cancer therapy. Mater. Horiz. 2020, 7, 574–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Shang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Wu, B.; Zhao, Q.; Li, J.; Huang, X.; Chen, W.; Gui, R. Platelet-membrane-camouflaged black phosphorus quantum dots enhance anticancer effect mediated by apoptosis and autophagy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 28254–28266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ben-Akiva, E.; Meyer, R.A.; Yu, H.; Smith, J.T.; Pardoll, D.M.; Green, J.J. Biomimetic anisotropic polymeric nanoparticles coated with red blood cell membranes for enhanced circulation and toxin removal. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaay9035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zhang, L.; Xie, X.; Liu, D.; Xu, Z.P.; Liu, R. Efficient co-delivery of neo-epitopes using dispersion-stable layered double hydroxide nanoparticles for enhanced melanoma immunotherapy. Biomaterials 2018, 174, 54–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Wang, Q.; Shen, J.; Mo, E.; Zhang, H.; Wang, J.; Hu, X.; Zhou, J.; Bai, H.; Tang, G. A versatile ultrafine and super-absorptive H+ -modified montmorillonite: Application for metabolic syndrome intervention and gastric mucosal protection. Biomater. Sci. 2020, 8, 3370–3380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Zhang, L.-X.; Hu, J.; Jia, Y.-B.; Liu, R.-T.; Cai, T.; Xu, Z.P. Two-dimensional layered double hydroxide nanoadjuvant: Recent progress and future direction. Nanoscale 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Li, M.; Fang, H.; Liu, Q.; Gai, Y.; Yuan, L.; Wang, S.; Li, H.; Hou, Y.; Gao, M.; Lan, X. Red blood cell membrane-coated upconversion nanoparticles for pretargeted multimodality imaging of triple-negative breast cancer. Biomater. Sci. 2020, 8, 1802–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Xu, L.; Wu, S.; Wang, J. Cancer cell membrane—Coated nanocarriers for homologous target inhibiting the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Bioact. Compat. Polym. 2019, 34, 58–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hu, C.-M.J.; Fang, R.H.; Wang, K.-C.; Luk, B.T.; Thamphiwatana, S.; Dehaini, D.; Nguyen, P.; Angsantikul, P.; Wen, C.H.; Kroll, A.V.; et al. Nanoparticle biointerfacing by platelet membrane cloaking. Nature 2015, 526, 118–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pernow, J.; Mahdi, A.; Yang, J.; Zhou, Z. Red blood cell dysfunction: A new player in cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc. Res. 2019, 115, 1596–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Gregg, D.; Goldschmidt-Clermont, P.J. Platelets and cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2003, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Silvestre-Roig, C.; Braster, Q.; Ortega-Gomez, A.; Soehnlein, O. Neutrophils as regulators of cardiovascular inflammation. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2020, 17, 327–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Xia, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; Hou, X.; Feng, N. Red blood cell membrane-camouflaged nanoparticles: A novel drug delivery system for antitumor application. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2019, 9, 675–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wang, S.; Duan, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Komarla, A.; Gong, H.; Gao, W.; Zhang, L. Drug targeting via platelet membrane—Coated nanoparticles. Small Struct. 2020, 1, 2000018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Thamphiwatana, S.; Angsantikul, P.; Escajadillo, T.; Zhang, Q.; Olson, J.; Luk, B.T.; Zhang, S.; Fang, R.H.; Gao, W.; Nizet, V.; et al. Macrophage-like nanoparticles concurrently absorbing endotoxins and proinflammatory cytokines for sepsis management. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 11488–11493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Peng, R.; Ji, H.; Jin, L.; Lin, S.; Huang, Y.; Xu, K.; Yang, Q.; Sun, D.; Wu, W. Macrophage-based therapies for atherosclerosis management. J. Immunol. Res. 2020, 2020, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Chu, D.; Dong, X.; Shi, X.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Z. Neutrophil-based drug delivery systems. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1706245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Fang, R.H.; Hu, C.-M.J.; Luk, B.T.; Gao, W.; Copp, J.A.; Tai, Y.; O’Connor, D.E.; Zhang, L. Cancer cell membrane-coated nanoparticles for anticancer vaccination and drug delivery. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 2181–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wang, M.; Xin, Y.; Cao, H.; Li, W.; Hua, Y.; Webster, T.J.; Zhang, C.; Tang, W.; Liu, Z. Recent advances in mesenchymal stem cell membrane-coated nanoparticles for enhanced drug delivery. Biomater. Sci. 2021, 9, 1088–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wang, D.; Liu, C.; You, S.; Zhang, K.; Li, M.; Cao, Y.; Wang, C.; Dong, H.; Zhang, X. Bacterial vesicle-cancer cell hybrid membrane-coated nanoparticles for tumor specific immune activation and photothermal therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 41138–41147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Lo, C.; Zhuang, J.; Angsantikul, P.; Zhang, Q.; Wei, X.; Zhou, Z.; Obonyo, M.; Fang, R.H.; et al. Inhibition of pathogen adhesion by bacterial outer membrane-coated nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 11404–11408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Oldenborg, P.-A.; Zheleznyak, A.; Fang, Y.-F.; Lagenaur, C.F.; Gresham, H.D.; Lindberg, F.P. Role of CD47 as a marker of self on red blood cells. Science 2000, 288, 2051–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Hu, C.-M.J.; Fang, R.H.; Copp, J.; Luk, B.T.; Zhang, L. A biomimetic nanosponge that absorbs pore-forming toxins. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 336–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Hu, C.-M.J.; Fang, R.H.; Luk, B.T.; Zhang, L. Nanoparticle-detained toxins for safe and effective vaccination. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 933–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Wang, Y.; Zhang, K.; Qin, X.; Li, T.; Qiu, J.; Yin, T.; Huang, J.; McGinty, S.; Pontrelli, G.; Ren, J.; et al. Biomimetic nanotherapies: Red blood cell based core–shell structured nanocomplexes for atherosclerosis management. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1900172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Shao, J.; Abdelghani, M.; Shen, G.; Cao, S.; Williams, D.S.; van Hest, J.C.M. Erythrocyte membrane modified janus polymeric motors for thrombus therapy. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 4877–4885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Van der Meijden, P.E.J.; Heemskerk, J.W.M. Platelet biology and functions: New concepts and clinical perspectives. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2019, 16, 166–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wang, S.; Wang, R.; Meng, N.; Guo, H.; Wu, S.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Wang, H.; Jiang, K.; Xie, C.; et al. Platelet membrane-functionalized nanoparticles with improved targeting ability and lower hemorrhagic risk for thrombolysis therapy. J. Control. Release 2020, 328, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Zhao, Y.; Xie, R.; Yodsanit, N.; Ye, M.; Wang, Y.; Wang, B.; Guo, L.-W.; Kent, K.C.; Gong, S. Hydrogen peroxide-responsive platelet membrane-coated nanoparticles for thrombus therapy. Biomater. Sci. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ma, Y.; Ma, Y.; Gao, M.; Han, Z.; Jiang, W.; Gu, Y.; Liu, Y. Platelet-mimicking therapeutic system for noninvasive mitigation of the progression of atherosclerotic plaques. Adv. Sci. 2021, 2004128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kolaczkowska, E.; Kubes, P. Neutrophil recruitment and function in health and inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13, 159–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Sreeramkumar, V.; Adrover, J.M.; Ballesteros, I.; Cuartero, M.I.; Rossaint, J.; Bilbao, I.; Nácher, M.; Pitaval, C.; Radovanovic, I.; Fukui, Y.; et al. Neutrophils scan for activated platelets to initiate inflammation. Science 2014, 346, 1234–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Schofield, Z.V.; Woodruff, T.M.; Halai, R.; Wu, M.C.-L.; Cooper, M.A. Neutrophils—A key component of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Shock 2013, 40, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Tang, C.; Wang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Xue, L.; Li, Y.; Ju, C.; Zhang, C. Recognition, intervention, and monitoring of neutrophils in acute ischemic stroke. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 4470–4477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Khoury, M.K.; Yang, H.; Liu, B. Macrophage biology in cardiovascular diseases. ATVB 2021, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Yap, J.; Cabrera-Fuentes, H.A.; Irei, J.; Hausenloy, D.J.; Boisvert, W.A. Role of macrophages in cardioprotection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Lim, S.Y.; Yuzhalin, A.E.; Gordon-Weeks, A.N.; Muschel, R.J. Targeting the CCL2-CCR2 signaling axis in cancer metastasis. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 28697–28710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Zhao, H.; Li, L.; Zhang, J.; Zheng, C.; Ding, K.; Xiao, H.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Z. C–C Chemokine Ligand 2 (CCL2) recruits macrophage-membrane-camouflaged hollow bismuth selenide nanoparticles to facilitate photothermal sensitivity and inhibit lung metastasis of breast cancer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 31124–31135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Gao, C.; Huang, Q.; Liu, C.; Kwong, C.H.T.; Yue, L.; Wan, J.-B.; Lee, S.M.Y.; Wang, R. Treatment of atherosclerosis by macrophage-biomimetic nanoparticles via targeted pharmacotherapy and sequestration of proinflammatory cytokines. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Wang, Y.; Zhang, K.; Li, T.; Maruf, A.; Qin, X.; Luo, L.; Zhong, Y.; Qiu, J.; McGinty, S.; Pontrelli, G.; et al. Macrophage membrane functionalized biomimetic nanoparticles for targeted anti-atherosclerosis applications. Theranostics 2021, 11, 164–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Xue, Y.; Zeng, G.; Cheng, J.; Hu, J.; Zhang, M.; Li, Y. Engineered macrophage membrane-enveloped nanomedicine for ameliorating myocardial infarction in a mouse model. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Xue, J.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, L.; Xue, L.; Shen, S.; Wen, Y.; Wei, Z.; Wang, L.; Kong, L.; Sun, H.; et al. Neutrophil-mediated anticancer drug delivery for suppression of postoperative malignant glioma recurrence. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017, 12, 692–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Zhang, Q.; Dehaini, D.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Chen, X.; Zhang, L.; Fang, R.H.; Gao, W.; Zhang, L. Neutrophil membrane-coated nanoparticles inhibit synovial inflammation and alleviate joint damage in inflammatory arthritis. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 1182–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Dong, X.; Gao, J.; Zhang, C.Y.; Hayworth, C.; Frank, M.; Wang, Z. Neutrophil membrane-derived nanovesicles alleviate inflammation to protect mouse brain injury from ischemic stroke. ACS Nano 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Feng, L.; Dou, C.; Xia, Y.; Li, B.; Zhao, M.; Yu, P.; Zheng, Y.; El-Toni, A.M.; Atta, N.F.; Galal, A.; et al. Neutrophil-like cell-membrane-coated nanozyme therapy for ischemic brain damage and long-term neurological functional recovery. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 2263–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Yellowley, C. CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling and other recruitment and homing pathways in fracture repair. BoneKEy Rep. 2013, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Lee, S.-P.; Youn, S.-W.; Cho, H.-J.; Li, L.; Kim, T.-Y.; Yook, H.-S.; Chung, J.-W.; Hur, J.; Yoon, C.-H.; Park, K.-W.; et al. Integrin-linked kinase, a hypoxia-responsive molecule, controls postnatal vasculogenesis by recruitment of endothelial progenitor cells to ischemic tissue. Circulation 2006, 114, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Bose, R.J.C.; Kim, B.J.; Arai, Y.; Han, I.; Moon, J.J.; Paulmurugan, R.; Park, H.; Lee, S.-H. Bioengineered stem cell membrane functionalized nanocarriers for therapeutic targeting of severe hindlimb ischemia. Biomaterials 2018, 185, 360–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Kim, H.Y.; Kim, T.J.; Kang, L.; Kim, Y.-J.; Kang, M.K.; Kim, J.; Ryu, J.H.; Hyeon, T.; Yoon, B.-W.; Ko, S.-B.; et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived magnetic extracellular nanovesicles for targeting and treatment of ischemic stroke. Biomaterials 2020, 243, 119942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Oroojalian, F.; Beygi, M.; Baradaran, B.; Mokhtarzadeh, A.; Shahbazi, M. Immune cell membrane-coated biomimetic nanoparticles for targeted cancer therapy. Small 2021, 17, 2006484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Jin, J.; Bhujwalla, Z.M. Biomimetic nanoparticles camouflaged in cancer cell membranes and their applications in cancer theranostics. Front. Oncol. 2020, 9, 1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Strobel, E. Hemolytic transfusion reactions. Transfus. Med. Hemother. 2008, 35, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Song, Y.; Huang, Z.; Liu, X.; Pang, Z.; Chen, J.; Yang, H.; Zhang, N.; Cao, Z.; Liu, M.; Cao, J.; et al. Platelet membrane-coated nanoparticle-mediated targeting delivery of rapamycin blocks atherosclerotic plaque development and stabilizes plaque in apolipoprotein e-deficient (ApoE−/−) mice. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2019, 15, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Huang, K.; Wen, S.; Wang, W.; Zhou, J.; Huang, J.; Wang, F.; Pang, L.; Wang, Y.; Sun, X. Erythrocyte membrane coated nanoparticle-based control releasing hydrogen sulfide system protects ischemic myocardium. Nanomedicine 2021, 16, 465–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Li, M.; Li, J.; Chen, J.; Liu, Y.; Cheng, X.; Yang, F.; Gu, N. Platelet membrane biomimetic magnetic nanocarriers for targeted delivery and in situ generation of nitric oxide in early ischemic stroke. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 2024–2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Ma, J.; Zhang, S.; Liu, J.; Liu, F.; Du, F.; Li, M.; Chen, A.T.; Bao, Y.; Suh, H.W.; Avery, J.; et al. Targeted drug delivery to stroke via chemotactic recruitment of nanoparticles coated with membrane of engineered neural stem cells. Small 2019, 15, 1902011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Dehaini, D.; Wei, X.; Fang, R.H.; Masson, S.; Angsantikul, P.; Luk, B.T.; Zhang, Y.; Ying, M.; Jiang, Y.; Kroll, A.V.; et al. Erythrocyte-platelet hybrid membrane coating for enhanced nanoparticle functionalization. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Han, X.; Shen, S.; Fan, Q.; Chen, G.; Archibong, E.; Dotti, G.; Liu, Z.; Gu, Z.; Wang, C. Red blood cell–derived nanoerythrosome for antigen delivery with enhanced cancer immunotherapy. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaaw6870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  128. Zinger, A.; Sushnitha, M.; Naoi, T.; Baudo, G.; De Rosa, E.; Chang, J.; Tasciotti, E.; Taraballi, F. Enhancing inflammation targeting using tunable leukocyte-based biomimetic nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2021, acsnano.0c05792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Cheng, Q.; Wei, T.; Farbiak, L.; Johnson, L.T.; Dilliard, S.A.; Siegwart, D.J. Selective organ targeting (SORT) nanoparticles for tissue-specific MRNA delivery and CRISPR–Cas gene editing. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2020, 15, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Cheng, B.; Xie, R.; Dong, L.; Chen, X. Metabolic remodeling of cell-surface sialic acids: Principles, applications, and recent advances. ChemBioChem 2016, 17, 11–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Stephan, M.T.; Irvine, D.J. Enhancing cell therapies from the outside in: Cell surface engineering using synthetic nanomaterials. Nano Today 2011, 6, 309–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Yan, H.; Shao, D.; Lao, Y.; Li, M.; Hu, H.; Leong, K.W. Engineering cell membrane-based nanotherapeutics to target inflammation. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1900605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Ai, X.; Wang, S.; Duan, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, M.S.; Gao, W.; Zhang, L. Emerging approaches to functionalizing cell membrane-coated nanoparticles. Biochemistry 2021, 60, 941–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 26 03428 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram showing the process of atherosclerosis. Under pathologic conditions, atherosclerosis develops with plaque formation. Atherosclerotic plaque will rupture with thrombus formation. Both thrombosis and atherosclerosis will cause local ischemia, resulting in coronary disease or peripheral arterial disease. In addition, thrombus may travel to the brain arteries, which induces ischemic stroke.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram showing the process of atherosclerosis. Under pathologic conditions, atherosclerosis develops with plaque formation. Atherosclerotic plaque will rupture with thrombus formation. Both thrombosis and atherosclerosis will cause local ischemia, resulting in coronary disease or peripheral arterial disease. In addition, thrombus may travel to the brain arteries, which induces ischemic stroke.
Molecules 26 03428 g001
Molecules 26 03428 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic diagram showing the synthetic process of cell membrane coated nanoparticles. Basically, interested membranes are first extracted from the cell sources, e.g., macrophages, neutrophils, erythrocytes, platelets, cancer cells and stem cells. The membranes are further coated on selected nanoparticles, e.g., black phosphorous, liposome, iron oxide nanoparticle, upconversion nanoparticle, gold nanorod and mesoporous silica nanoparticle. The membrane–core hybrid system can be applied to treat cardiovascular diseases. Abbreviations: BP: black phosphorous; LP: liposome; IONP: iron oxide nanoparticle; UCNP: upconversion nanoparticle; Au NR: gold nanorod; MSN: mesoporous silica nanoparticle.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram showing the synthetic process of cell membrane coated nanoparticles. Basically, interested membranes are first extracted from the cell sources, e.g., macrophages, neutrophils, erythrocytes, platelets, cancer cells and stem cells. The membranes are further coated on selected nanoparticles, e.g., black phosphorous, liposome, iron oxide nanoparticle, upconversion nanoparticle, gold nanorod and mesoporous silica nanoparticle. The membrane–core hybrid system can be applied to treat cardiovascular diseases. Abbreviations: BP: black phosphorous; LP: liposome; IONP: iron oxide nanoparticle; UCNP: upconversion nanoparticle; Au NR: gold nanorod; MSN: mesoporous silica nanoparticle.
Molecules 26 03428 g002
Molecules 26 03428 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) Synthetic route of RBC-NPs; (B) SDS-PAGE result of emptied RBCs, RBC membrane-derived vesicles and RBC membrane camouflaged NPs; (C) Scanning fluorescence microscopy images of colocalization of RBC membranes (marked with green rhodamine-DMPE dyes) and polymeric cores (marked with red DiD dyes) after being internalized by HeLa cells; (D) Comparison of systemic circulation time between RBC-NPs, PEGylated NPs and PLGA nanoparticles. Reproduced with permission [41]. Copyright 2011, National Academy of Sciences.
Figure 3. (A) Synthetic route of RBC-NPs; (B) SDS-PAGE result of emptied RBCs, RBC membrane-derived vesicles and RBC membrane camouflaged NPs; (C) Scanning fluorescence microscopy images of colocalization of RBC membranes (marked with green rhodamine-DMPE dyes) and polymeric cores (marked with red DiD dyes) after being internalized by HeLa cells; (D) Comparison of systemic circulation time between RBC-NPs, PEGylated NPs and PLGA nanoparticles. Reproduced with permission [41]. Copyright 2011, National Academy of Sciences.
Molecules 26 03428 g003
Molecules 26 03428 g004 550
Figure 4. (A) Structure of platelet membrane coated PLGA nanoparticle; (B) Schematic diagram of therapeutic mechanism. Platelet membrane coated nanoparticles can straightly target the inflammatory neutrophils and take effect through releasing piceatannol to block neutrophils’ infiltration. Reproduced with permission [85]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.
Figure 4. (A) Structure of platelet membrane coated PLGA nanoparticle; (B) Schematic diagram of therapeutic mechanism. Platelet membrane coated nanoparticles can straightly target the inflammatory neutrophils and take effect through releasing piceatannol to block neutrophils’ infiltration. Reproduced with permission [85]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.
Molecules 26 03428 g004
Molecules 26 03428 g005 550
Figure 5. (A) Schematic structure of neutrophil-mimic membrane coated mesoporous Prussian blue nanozyme (MPBzyme@NCM); (B) Schematic diagram of the therapeutic mechanism. Combination of reduction of neutrophils’ recruitment, microglia polarization from M1 to M2, decreased apoptosis of neurons and proliferation of neural stem cells, neuronal precursors and neurons explain the therapeutic efficacy of MPBzyme@NCM. Reproduced with permission [114]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society.
Figure 5. (A) Schematic structure of neutrophil-mimic membrane coated mesoporous Prussian blue nanozyme (MPBzyme@NCM); (B) Schematic diagram of the therapeutic mechanism. Combination of reduction of neutrophils’ recruitment, microglia polarization from M1 to M2, decreased apoptosis of neurons and proliferation of neural stem cells, neuronal precursors and neurons explain the therapeutic efficacy of MPBzyme@NCM. Reproduced with permission [114]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society.
Molecules 26 03428 g005
Table
Table 1. Common inner particles applied in core–membrane strategy.
Table 1. Common inner particles applied in core–membrane strategy.
Core ParticlePropertiesApplicationRef.
PLGABiocompatibility and biodegradability
Easy manipulation		Drug carrier[58]
LiposomeHydrophobic and hydrophilic drug delivery
Sustained drug release		Drug carrier[62,63]
MSNTunable pore size
High pore volume		Drug carrier[65,66]
UCNPConvert NIR into visible light Deep tissue imaging[76]
Gold NPsPhotothermal effectPhotothermal therapy[64]
IONPMagnetic propertyMRI
Magnetic targeting		[67,68]
BP NanosheetPhotothermal conversionPhotothermal therapy[69,70,71]
Table
Table 2. Main usage of several common cell membranes.
Table 2. Main usage of several common cell membranes.
Membrane SourcePropertiesApplicationRef.
Red blood cellImmune evasionProlong circulation[82]
PlateletSelective targeting to injured tissue
Adherence to inflammatory neutrophil		Targeting cancer metastasis
Targeting vascular injury		[83]
MacrophageImmune evasion
Cytokine sequestration		Inflammatory site targeting
Anti-inflammation		[84,85]
NeutrophilSelective targeting to inflammatory tissueInflammatory site targeting[86]
Cancer cellTumor targeting
Antigen delivery		Homotypic targeting
Cancer vaccine		[87]
Stem cellPenetration across the endotheliumTumor targeting
Inflammatory migratory		[88]
BacteriumElicit immune response
Anti-adhesion		Cancer immune therapy
Bacterial infection		[89,90]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, C.; Ma, J.; Ji, Z.; Shen, J.; Wang, Q. Recent Advances of Cell Membrane Coated Nanoparticles in Treating Cardiovascular Disorders. Molecules 2021, 26, 3428. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26113428

AMA Style

Zhu C, Ma J, Ji Z, Shen J, Wang Q. Recent Advances of Cell Membrane Coated Nanoparticles in Treating Cardiovascular Disorders. Molecules. 2021; 26(11):3428. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26113428

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Chaojie, Junkai Ma, Zhiheng Ji, Jie Shen, and Qiwen Wang. 2021. "Recent Advances of Cell Membrane Coated Nanoparticles in Treating Cardiovascular Disorders" Molecules 26, no. 11: 3428. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26113428

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop