Next Article in Journal
Vancomycin Resistance in Enterococcus and Staphylococcus aureus
Next Article in Special Issue
The Hormetic Effect Observed for Benzalkonium Chloride and Didecyldimethylammonium Chloride in Serratia sp. HRI
Previous Article in Journal
Fervidobacterium pennivorans subsp. keratinolyticus subsp. nov., a Novel Feather-Degrading Anaerobic Thermophile
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Candida albicans Strains Adapted to Caspofungin Due to Aneuploidy Become Highly Tolerant under Continued Drug Pressure

Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(1), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010023
Submission received: 9 December 2022 / Revised: 17 December 2022 / Accepted: 17 December 2022 / Published: 21 December 2022

Abstract

:
Candida albicans is a prevalent fungal pathogen of humans. Understanding the development of decreased susceptibility to ECN drugs of this microbe is of substantial interest, as it is viewed as an intermediate step allowing the formation of FKS1 resistance mutations. We used six previously characterized mutants that decreased caspofungin susceptibility either by acquiring aneuploidy of chromosome 5 (Ch5) or by aneuploidy-independent mechanisms. When we exposed these caspofungin-adapted mutants to caspofungin again, we obtained 60 evolved mutants with further decreases in caspofungin susceptibility, as determined with CLSI method. We show that the initial adaptation to caspofungin is coupled with the adaptation to other ECNs, such as micafungin and anidulafungin, in mutants with no ploidy change, but not in aneuploid mutants, which become more susceptible to micafungin and anidulafungin. Furthermore, we find that the initial mechanism of caspofungin adaptation determines the pattern of further adaptation as parentals with no ploidy change further adapt to all ECNs by relatively small decreases in susceptibility, whereas aneuploid parentals adapt to all ECNs, primarily by large decrease in susceptibilities. Our data suggest that either distinct or common mechanisms can govern adaptation to different ECNs.

1. Introduction

The human fungal pathogen Candida albicans is the most common cause of systemic candidiasis. Along with infections by non-albicans species, C. albicans increasingly displays resistance to antifungals [1,2,3,4,5]. C. albicans resistance to drugs from the front-line class of echinocandins (ECNs) is exclusively due to point mutations in the FKS1 (orf19.2929) gene, which encodes for a catalytic subunit of 1,3-β-glucan synthase [6]. These mutations are clustered in two regions, HS1 and HS2, encompassing residues 641 to 649, and 1345 to 1365, respectively [7], and cause dramatic elevation of C. albicans minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values to ECNs [6]. However, many clinical isolates display a wide range of ECN drug susceptibilities with MIC increases up to the clinical breakpoint in the absence of FKS1 resistance mutations [8,9,10,11], a physiological state that we hereafter refer to as adaptation or tolerance. As drug tolerance is thought to be a step leading to development of clinical resistance due to FKS1 mutations, understanding mechanisms of tolerance is of considerable importance [12].
Previously, several laboratories reported that caspofungin-adapted mutants are easily generated with C. glabrata or C. albicans in vitro on agar plates that are supplemented with caspofungin (reviewed in [12]). Such mutants have no mutations in the clinically important FKS1 gene and typically exhibit 2- to 8-fold MIC increases, C. albicans [13], or up to 32-fold MIC increase, C. glabrata [14]. It was also demonstrated with laboratory-generated C. albicans mutants that aneuploidy of either chromosome 5 (Ch5) or Ch2, as well as yet undefined aneuploidy-independent mechanism(s) are responsible for increased caspofungin MICs (reviewed in [12]). We consider these caspofungin-tolerant mutants as models of C. albicans clinical isolates with increased MICs. The purpose of this paper is to assess the ability of aneuploidy-dependent and independent mechanisms to support the further evolution of tolerance in the presence of caspofungin.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains, Media and Growth Conditions

C. albicans caspofungin-adapted mutants used in this study are listed in Table S1 (also see Table 1). Chromosomal condition of these mutants was examined by pulse-field gel electrophoresis. DNA-seq confirmed the chromosomal condition of SMC60-2-5 and JMC160-2-5 [13].
Cells were stored in 25% vol/vol glycerol solution at −80 °C to interrupt cellular metabolism and, thus, prevent induction of genetic instability [15].
YPD medium was prepared with 1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% dextrose. To prepare solid medium, 2% (w/v) agar was added. Caspofungin (Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp., Kenilworth, NJ, USA); anidulafungin (Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA); or micafungin (MedChem Express LLC, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA) were handled according to manufacture recommendations and added when needed.
Primers used in this study are listed in Figure S1.

2.2. Broth Microdilution Assay to Determine Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

Broth microdilution assay was performed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference M27-A3 broth microdilution method for yeasts [16] with some modifications. Briefly, assay was conducted with YPD medium in a total volume of 200 µL. A series of two-fold dilutions of caspofungin, anidulafungin or micafungin were prepared directly in 96-well, flat-bottom, polystyrene, microtiter plates. 103 cells in 100 µL of YPD medium were inoculated in each well to have a total volume of 200 µL. Each strain was tested in duplicate or triplicate on a microtiter plate. Parental strain was included on each plate. Plates were incubated at 35 °C and monitored for 48 h. Control well without cells was used to subtract background and no drug control well was used for normalization. The optical densities were measured with Spark Multimode Microplate Reader (TECAN, Zurich, Switzerland) at 600 nm. Normalized readings were generated in Microsoft Excel 2016 and presented as heat maps. Each assay was repeated three times in independent experiments.

2.3. In Vitro Evolution of Strains

Clump of C. albicans cells was removed from −80 °C frozen stock, streaked on YPD plates and incubated at 37 °C until colonies containing ~105 cells per colony. Colonies were collected and resuspended in 1 mL of saline water (0.9% NaCl), as recommended in [17]. An appropriate adjustment of cell density in suspension was performed with the aid of haemocytometer. After that, we followed the experimental design by Balashov et al. [18]. Namely, ~108 colony-forming units (CFU) were spread on each of three YPD plates supplemented with caspofungin at twice concentration of MIC for each strain, as well as on three drug-free control YPD plates. In addition, ~103 CFU were spread on each of three drug-free control YPD plates. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 2 to 3 days. Each colony that evolved on drug plates was purified by subcloning on a fresh YPD plate containing an amount of drug equivalent to that used for initial selection. Glycerol stocks of evolved colonies were prepared and stored at −80 °C. Further, strains from frozen glycerol stocks were evaluated with broth microdilution assays for their MICs.
Frequencies of colonies with increased tolerance to caspofungin were calculated by dividing the number of colonies with increased MIC on each of three drug plates by the starting inoculum plated, ~108 CFU, and subsequently averaging three values.

2.4. Sequencing of FKS1 Hot Spots HS1 and HS2 Regions

Cells were removed from −80 °C frozen stock, streaked on YPD plates and incubated at 37 °C until colonies contained ~105 cells. Colonies were collected and genomic DNA was extracted using Cold Spring Harbor Protocol [19]. Q5 high-fidelity DNA polymerase (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) was used to amplify the FKS1 HS1 and HS2 regions with the following PCR conditions: an initial denaturation at 98 °C for 30 s followed by 34 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 56 °C for 20 s, and 72 °C for 30 s and then a final 5 min final extension at 72 °C. Amplicons were sequenced by Azenta Genewiz (Plainfield, NJ, USA) (see the bottom of Figure S1 for the cartoon of regions and position of primers). NCBI basic local alignment search tool was used for analysis of sequencing results.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Caspofungin-Adapted Parental Mutants Have Decreased Susceptibility to Caspofungin Only

To study the C. albicans evolutionary path in response to caspofungin, we used drug-adapted mutants we previously derived from strains JRCT1 or SC5314 by direct selection on solid medium supplemented with lethal amounts of caspofungin (Table S1; [13]). Tolerance in these mutants is associated with remodeling of the cell wall, characterized by increased chitin and decreased β-glucan, as well as with expression changes of three FKS genes in the absence of canonical resistance mutations in the clinically relevant gene FKS1. Three different mechanisms are responsible for the caspofungin tolerance in the above mutants: (i) aneuploidy-independent mechanisms where mutants remain normal diploids; (ii) combination of one normal Ch5 and one iso-Ch5R having two right arms, and (iii) loss of one copy of Ch5, resulting in Ch5 monosomy (Figure 1) [13]. Here, we used two representative caspofungin-adapted mutants representing each of the three mechanisms, i.e., no ploidy change, JMC200-2-5 and JMC160-2-5; iso-Ch5R, JMC120-1-6 and JMC120-2-5; and Ch5 monosomy, SMC60-3-4 and SMC60-2-5 that arose from two different genetic backgrounds (see Table S1). We confirmed increased caspofungin MICs (Materials and Methods) of the six caspofungin-adapted mutants vs. their parental strains, which were consistent with that first reported [13] (Figure S2, Table S1).
We next asked whether the initial caspofungin adaptation is coupled with adaptation to two other ECNs, micafungin and anidulafungin. As presented in Figure S2, Table S2 and summarized in Table 1, different classes of caspofungin-adapted mutants (Figure 1) show different susceptibility levels to the other ECNs. Specifically, euploid mutants, referred to here as “no ploidy change” became adapted to all three ECNs. In contrast, Ch5 aneuploid mutants exhibited increased susceptibility to micafungin and anidulafungin. Cross-adaptation of the no ploidy change mutants to ECNs is reminiscent of recently reported C. albicans mutants adapted to the new ECN rezafungin [20], which also became more tolerant to caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin [21]. However, the increased susceptibility phenotypes of mutants with Ch5 aneuploidy are reminiscent of previously reported CRS-MIS (Caspofungin Reduced Susceptibility—Micafungin Increased Susceptibility) phenotypes of caspofungin-adapted C. glabrata, due to altered membrane sphingolipids [14,22]. These data raised the possibility that distinct mechanisms can lead to adaptation to specific ECN drugs or groups of drugs in C. albicans.

3.2. Generation and Properties of Strains That Evolved from Caspofungin-Adapted Mutants

The six caspofungin-adapted mutants were plated on solid medium supplemented with twice the caspofungin MIC concentration for each strain. All 106 colonies that grew on the drug plates (see example in Figure 2) were collected and checked for their caspofungin MICs with the broth microdilution method. Sixty (of the 106) colonies acquired increased caspofungin MICs, with values ranging from 2- to 256-fold compared to the MICs of the parental caspofungin-adapted mutants (Table 2 and Table S2; Figure 3 and Figure S3). We designated the 60 corresponding strains as evolved mutants. Frequencies of the evolved mutants ranged from 8.6 × 10−8 to 4.5 × 10−7.
Most important, evolved mutants with higher (≥16-fold) increases in caspofungin MIC levels also displayed high tolerance to micafungin and anidulafungin, exhibiting increases in MICs ranging from 16- to 256-fold for these ECNs (Table 2 and Table S2, Figure 3).
We noted that many adapted mutants exhibited very high MIC values, covering a range of 1–4 µg/mL for all three ECNs tested, with 23, 17, and 16 mutants exhibiting MIC values in this range for caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin, respectively. These values are at or above the currently established breakpoint (BP) values for resistance, ≥1 µg/mL by CLSI, for C. albicans and caspofungin/micafungin/anidulafungin [23]. Our limited analysis of possible mechanisms behind the larger increases of MICs included Sanger sequencing of HS1 and HS2 regions of the clinically important gene FKS1. The sequencing was performed with four representative evolved mutants (C1, C2-1, E9, and E2-4) that were derived from caspofungin-adapted parentals with aneuploid Ch5 and acquired high MIC increases for caspofungin (8-, 32-, 64- and 32-fold respectively), micafungin (32-, 64-, 64- and 8-fold respectively) and anidulafungin (16-, 32-, 128- and 256-fold respectively) (Table S2 and Figure S3). Importantly, in all of these cases we found no FKS1 resistance mutations. Control sequencing of B1 (exhibited 4-, 2-, and 2-fold MIC increase for caspofungin, micafungin and anidulafungin respectively) and B2-20 (8-fold MIC increase for caspofungin, while no change in MIC observed for micafungin and anidulafungin), as expected, revealed no FKS1 mutations. These results demonstrate that C. albicans has the ability to coordinately and highly increase tolerance to multiple ECNs independently of Fks1p. Further studies with animal models are required to assess the impact of the high MICs of such mutants upon their level of tolerance/resistance in vivo.
Intriguingly, the levels of high caspofungin MIC increases distributed non-randomly among evolved mutants based on parental origin. Parental strains with no ploidy change produced evolved mutants with predominantly relatively moderate 2- to 4-fold increases in MICs, with values under the BP for resistance. Some of these mutants also showed relatively moderate increase of micafungin and anidulafungin MICs. In contrast, practically all mutants that exhibited high increases of caspofungin MICs ranging from ≥16-fold were evolved from parentals containing different Ch5 aneuploidies, as summarized in Table 2 and Figure 4. Interestingly, the high increases of caspofunign MICs for evolved mutants derived from aneuploid parentals were all associated with cross-adaptation, as these strains also exhibited up to 128 to 256-fold increases in MICs to micafungin and anidulafungin.
As there were a number of colonies grown on drug plates that did not exhibit decreased caspofungin susceptibility when tested with the broth microdilution method, we tested two representative colonies B4 and B2-3 with spot assays on caspofungin, micafungin and anidulafungin drug plates. B4 showed no difference in the growth vs. parental strain, whereas B2-3 grew substantially better than the parental strain, hence acquired tolerance to ECNs (data not shown). We conclude that at least some of 45 mutants that did not exhibit adaptation to caspofungin by broth microdilution did, in fact, acquire decreased ECN susceptibilities.
We speculate that one of the putative mechanisms responsible for MIC increases could be transcriptional changes of multiple genes that have a role in ECN susceptibility (see [24]). It will be interesting in future experiments to compare composition of cell walls in evolved mutants vs. their parents, as well as to analyze genome-wide transcriptional, DNA, and epigenetic profiles of evolved mutants, as compared to their parentals and among themselves. It would be also of interest to determine how high increases of MICs are related to dosage compensation and increased histone H4 acetylation that were previously demonstrated on the monosomic Ch5 [25,26].

3.3. Medical Importance

If caspofungin-adapted mutants with Ch5 aneuploidies indeed arise during caspofungin therapy of C. albicans infections, our results suggest that these mutants could, under prolonged treatment with this drug, produce the mutants that are highly tolerant to all ECNs. This might imply that combinational therapy with more than one ECN [27] may be more effective than, for example, caspofungin only.

4. Conclusions

We find that initial adaptation of C. albicans to caspofungin on agar plates exhibits at least two distinct patterns: simultaneous increase of tolerance to all three clinically relevant ECNs or to caspofungin only. This implies that tolerance to different ECNs can depend either on individual mechanisms or on common mechanism.
We also find that the response of caspofungin-adapted mutants to further challenge by this drug depends on the mutant class. For example, mutants with Ch5 aneuploidy predominantly acquire high tolerance to all three ECNs, upon further exposure to caspofungin. However, mutants with no ploidy change typically acquire only moderate increases in cross-adaptation to other ECNs.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms11010023/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.R.; Methodology, E.R. and F.H.; Validation, F.H., S.K.S. and A.Y.; Resources, E.R.; Formal analysis, E.R., F.H., S.K.S. and A.Y.; Investigation, F.H., S.K.S. and A.Y.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, F.H.; Writing—Review and Editing, E.R. and J.J.H.; Visualisation, F.H., S.K.S. and A.Y.; Supervision, Project Administration, Funding Acquisition, E.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by R01AI141884 to E.R. and R01GM052426 to J.J.H.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Merck and Co., Inc. for generous donation of caspofungin and Pfizer Inc. for generous donation of anidulafungin via a compound transfer program.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Heredia, M.Y.; Gunasekaran, D.; Ikeh, M.A.C.; Nobile, C.J.; Rauceo, J.M. Transcriptional regulation of the caspofungin-induced cell wall damage response in Candida albicans. Curr. Genet. 2020, 66, 1059–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lee, Y.; Puumala, E.; Robbins, N.; Cowen, L.E. Antifungal drug resistance: Molecular mechanisms in Candida albicans and beyond. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 3390–3411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pristov, K.E.; Ghannoum, M.A. Resistance of Candida to azoles and echinocandins worldwide. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2019, 25, 792–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Robbins, N.; Cowen, L.E. Antifungal drug resistance: Deciphering the mechanisms governing multidrug resistance in the fungal pathogen Candida glabrata. Curr. Biol. 2021, 31, R1520–R1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Whaley, S.G.; Berkow, E.L.; Rybak, J.M.; Nishimoto, A.T.; Barker, K.S.; Rogers, P.D. Azole antifungal resistance in Candida albicans and emerging non-albicans Candida species. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Perlin, D.S. Mechanisms of echinocandin antifungal drug resistance: Mechanism of echinocandin drug resistance. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 2015, 1354, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Park, S.; Kelly, R.; Kahn, J.N.; Robles, J.; Hsu, M.-J.; Register, E.; Li, W.; Vyas, V.; Fan, H.; Abruzzo, G.; et al. Specific substitutions in the echinocandin target Fks1p account for reduced susceptibility of rare laboratory and clinical Candida sp. isolates. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 2005, 49, 3264–3273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Espinel-Ingroff, A.; Arendrup, M.; Cantón, E.; Cordoba, S.; Dannaoui, E.; García-Rodríguez, J.; Gonzalez, G.M.; Govender, N.P.; Martin-Mazuelos, E.; Lackner, M.; et al. Multicenter study of method-dependent epidemiological cutoff values for detection of resistance in Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. to amphotericin B and echinocandins for the Etest agar diffusion method. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 2017, 61, e01792-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Matsumoto, E.; Boyken, L.; Tendolkar, S.; McDanel, J.; Castanheira, M.; Pfaller, M.; Diekema, D. Candidemia surveillance in Iowa: Emergence of echinocandin resistance. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect Dis. 2014, 79, 205–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pfaller, M.A.; Messer, S.A.; Diekema, D.J.; Jones, R.N.; Castanheira, M. Use of micafungin as a surrogate marker to predict susceptibility and resistance to caspofungin among 3764 clinical isolates of Candida by use of CLSI methods and interpretive criteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pfaller, M.A.; Messer, S.A.; Woosley, L.N.; Jones, R.N.; Castanheira, M. Echinocandin and triazole antifungal susceptibility profiles for clinical opportunistic yeast and mold isolates collected from 2010 to 2011: Application of new CLSI clinical breakpoints and epidemiological cutoff values for characterization of geographic and temporal trends of antifungal resistance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 2571–2581. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Sah, S.K.; Hayes, J.J.; Rustchenko, E. The role of aneuploidy in the emergence of echinocandin resistance in human fungal pathogen Candida albicans. PLoS Pathog. 2021, 17, e1009564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yang, F.; Zhang, L.; Wakabayashi, H.; Myers, J.; Jiang, Y.; Cao, Y.; Jimenez-Ortigosa, C.; Perlin, D.S.; Rustchenko, E. Tolerance to caspofungin in Candida albicans is associated with at least three distinctive mechanisms that govern expression of FKS genes and cell wall remodeling. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 2017, 61, e00071-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Healey, K.R.; Katiyar, S.K.; Raj, S.; Edlind, T.D. CRS-MIS in Candida glabrata: Sphingolipids modulate echinocandin-Fks interaction: Sphingolipids modulate echinocandin-Fks interaction. Mol. Microbiol. 2012, 86, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ahmad, A.; Kabir, M.A.; Kravets, A.; Andaluz, E.; Larriba, G.; Rustchenko, E. Chromosome instability and unusual features of some widely used strains of Candida albicans. Yeast 2008, 25, 433–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M27-A3 Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts: Approved Standard, 3rd ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  17. Locke, J.B.; Almaguer, A.L.; Zuill, D.E.; Bartizal, K. Characterization of in vitro resistance development to the novel echinocandin CD101 in Candida species. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 2016, 60, 6100–6107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Balashov, S.V.; Park, S.; Perlin, D.S. Assessing resistance to the echinocandin antifungal drug caspofungin in Candida albicans by profiling mutations in FKS1. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 2006, 50, 2058–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Heintz, N.; Gong, S. Small-scale preparations of yeast DNA. Cold. Spring. Harb. Protoc. 2020, 2020, pdb.prot098152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tóth, Z.; Forgács, L.; Kardos, T.; Kovács, R.; Locke, J.B.; Kardos, G.; Nagy, F.; Borman, A.M.; Adnan, A.; Majoros, L. Relative frequency of paradoxical growth and trailing effect with caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin, and the novel echinocandin rezafungin against Candida species. JoF 2020, 6, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, H.; Cao, Y.; Yan, T.; Jiang, Y.; Yang, F. Aneuploidy underlies paradoxical growth of rezafungin and enables cross-tolerance to echinocandins in Candida albicans. J. Infect. 2022, 85, 702–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Healey, K.R.; Katiyar, S.K.; Castanheira, M.; Pfaller, M.A.; Edlind, T.D. Candida glabrata mutants demonstrating paradoxical reduced caspofungin susceptibility but increased micafungin susceptibility. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 2011, 55, 3947–3949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Pfaller, M.A.; Diekema, D.J.; Andes, D.; Arendrup, M.C.; Brown, S.D.; Lockhart, S.R.; Motyl, M.; Perlin, D.S. CLSI Subcommittee for antifungal Testing. Clinical breakpoints for the echinocandins and Candida revisited: Integration of molecular, clinical, and microbiological data to arrive at species-specific interpretive criteria. Drug Resist. Updat. 2011, 14, 164–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sah, S.K.; Bhattacharya, S.; Yadav, A.; Husain, F.; Ndiaye, A.B.K.T.; Kruppa, M.D.; Hayes, J.J.; Rustchenko, E. Multiple genes of Candida albicans influencing echinocandin susceptibility in caspofungin-adapted mutants. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 2022, e00977-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kravets, A.; Qin, H.; Ahmad, A.; Bethlendy, G.; Gao, Q.; Rustchenko, E. Widespread occurrence of dosage compensation in Candida albicans. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Wakabayashi, H.; Tucker, C.; Bethlendy, G.; Kravets, A.; Welle, S.L.; Bulger, M.; Hayes, J.J.; Rustchenko, E. NuA4 histone acetyltransferase activity is required for H4 acetylation on a dosage-compensated monosomic chromosome that confers resistance to fungal toxins. Epigenetics Chromatine 2017, 10, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Gow, N.A.R.; Johnson, C.; Berman, J.; Coste, A.T.; Cuomo, C.A.; Perlin, D.S.; Bicanic, T.; Harrison, T.S.; Wiederhold, N.; Bromley, M.; et al. The importance of antimicrobial resistance in medical mycology. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cartoon presenting three types of caspofungin-adapted mutants that were used in this work to generate caspofungin-evolved mutants. Shown is condition of only Ch5 in each mutant type, as explained on the right.
Figure 1. Cartoon presenting three types of caspofungin-adapted mutants that were used in this work to generate caspofungin-evolved mutants. Shown is condition of only Ch5 in each mutant type, as explained on the right.
Microorganisms 11 00023 g001
Figure 2. Generation of caspofungin-evolved mutants from caspofungin-adapted parental mutants. (Left) Confluent growth was obtained after plating ~108 CFUs of the caspofungin-adapted parent on control YPD medium. (Right) Only some colonies, i.e., caspofungin-evolved mutants, were obtained after plating ~108 CFUs of the caspofungin-adapted parent on YPD medium supplemented with twice the MIC of caspofungin concentration.
Figure 2. Generation of caspofungin-evolved mutants from caspofungin-adapted parental mutants. (Left) Confluent growth was obtained after plating ~108 CFUs of the caspofungin-adapted parent on control YPD medium. (Right) Only some colonies, i.e., caspofungin-evolved mutants, were obtained after plating ~108 CFUs of the caspofungin-adapted parent on YPD medium supplemented with twice the MIC of caspofungin concentration.
Microorganisms 11 00023 g002
Figure 3. Increased MICs of caspofungin-evolved mutants and cross-adaptation of mutants with alterations of Ch5 to other ECNs. The heat maps represent growths of various C. albicans strains by broth microdilution assay. CAS, MFG and ANI refer to caspofungin, micafungin and anidulafungin, respectively. Shown are representative mutants that evolved from CAS-adapted JMC120-1-6 and JMC120-2-5 having iso-Ch5R, (A); SMC60-3-4 and SMC60-2-5 having Ch5 monosomy, (B); and JMC200-2-5 and JMC160-2-5 with no ploidy change, (C). Assay was performed according to CLSI method in YPD medium including maximum CAS, MFG and ANI concentration of 4 μg/mL and two-fold serial dilutions. 103 cells were inoculated in each well in either duplicates or triplicates (technical replicates). Plates were incubated at 35 °C for 24 h. Control wells without drug or without cells were included. No cells control was used to subtract background. No drug control was used for normalization. Color bar for % growth is presented for each panel underneath. MICs were measured as 90% growth inhibition relative to a drug free control. Note that mutants evolved from no ploidy change parentals, often show no cross adaptation with other ECNs.
Figure 3. Increased MICs of caspofungin-evolved mutants and cross-adaptation of mutants with alterations of Ch5 to other ECNs. The heat maps represent growths of various C. albicans strains by broth microdilution assay. CAS, MFG and ANI refer to caspofungin, micafungin and anidulafungin, respectively. Shown are representative mutants that evolved from CAS-adapted JMC120-1-6 and JMC120-2-5 having iso-Ch5R, (A); SMC60-3-4 and SMC60-2-5 having Ch5 monosomy, (B); and JMC200-2-5 and JMC160-2-5 with no ploidy change, (C). Assay was performed according to CLSI method in YPD medium including maximum CAS, MFG and ANI concentration of 4 μg/mL and two-fold serial dilutions. 103 cells were inoculated in each well in either duplicates or triplicates (technical replicates). Plates were incubated at 35 °C for 24 h. Control wells without drug or without cells were included. No cells control was used to subtract background. No drug control was used for normalization. Color bar for % growth is presented for each panel underneath. MICs were measured as 90% growth inhibition relative to a drug free control. Note that mutants evolved from no ploidy change parentals, often show no cross adaptation with other ECNs.
Microorganisms 11 00023 g003
Figure 4. Pie charts depicting the percentage of caspofungin-evolved mutants from each class of caspofungin-adapted mutants, no ploidy change, JMC200-2-5 and JMC160-2-5; iso-Ch5R, JMC120-1-6 and JMC120-2-5; and Ch5 monosomy, SMC60-3-4 and SMC60-2-5. Evolved mutants are presented according to their caspofungin MICs. Black, orange and green colors are representing the proportion of colonies with no change in MIC, 2–8-fold increase, and ≥16 fold increase in MIC, respectively, as compared to their caspofungin-adapted parental strains.
Figure 4. Pie charts depicting the percentage of caspofungin-evolved mutants from each class of caspofungin-adapted mutants, no ploidy change, JMC200-2-5 and JMC160-2-5; iso-Ch5R, JMC120-1-6 and JMC120-2-5; and Ch5 monosomy, SMC60-3-4 and SMC60-2-5. Evolved mutants are presented according to their caspofungin MICs. Black, orange and green colors are representing the proportion of colonies with no change in MIC, 2–8-fold increase, and ≥16 fold increase in MIC, respectively, as compared to their caspofungin-adapted parental strains.
Microorganisms 11 00023 g004
Table 1. Caspofungin-adapted parentals and their micafungin and anidulafungin phenotypes *.
Table 1. Caspofungin-adapted parentals and their micafungin and anidulafungin phenotypes *.
StrainCASMFG **ANI **
No ploidy change
Parent JRCT1
JMC200-2-5
JMC160-2-5

+
+

+
+

+
+
Ch5 monosomic
Parent SC5314
SMC60-3-4
SMC60-2-5

+
+

− −
− −

− −
− −
Iso-Ch5R
Parent JRCT1
JMC120-1-6
JMC120-2-5

+
+

− −
− −

INC
INC
* − or + refer to, respectively, susceptibility or tolerance. − − refers to increased susceptibility. ** See Figure S2A for the growth in presence of micafungin or anidulafungin. INC stands for inconsistent growth.
Table 2. Increase of MICs of colonies that evolved from various classes of caspofungin-adapted mutants * as determined with broth microdilution assay. Note that each evolved mutant was validated for adaptation to caspofungin followed by cross-adaptation to other ECNs. Additionally, note a non-random distribution of dramatically increased MICs that are in bold.
Table 2. Increase of MICs of colonies that evolved from various classes of caspofungin-adapted mutants * as determined with broth microdilution assay. Note that each evolved mutant was validated for adaptation to caspofungin followed by cross-adaptation to other ECNs. Additionally, note a non-random distribution of dramatically increased MICs that are in bold.
DCASMFGANI
CAS-Adapted Parental Mutant *2X MIC Conc.
(µg/mL)
No. of Recove-red Cols.No. of Evolved Colonies—Increase of MICsNo. of Colonies
W. 16- or 32-Fold Increase
of MICs
% of Colonies
w. 16- or 32-Fold Increase
of MICs
No. of Evolved Colonies—Increase of MICsNo. of Colonies
W. 16- or 32-Fold Increase
of MICs
% of Colonies
W. 16- or 32-Fold Increase
of MICs
No. of Evolved Colonies—Increase of MICsNo. of Colonies
W. 16- or 32-Fold Increase
of MICs
% of Colonies
W. 16- or 32-Fold Increase
of MICs **
JMC200-2-5
No ploidy change

0.500

26
3–4-fold
1–8-fold

0

NA

1–2-fold

0

NA

1–2-fold

0

NA
JMC160-2-5
No ploidy change

0.500

26
4–2-fold
5–4-fold
2–8-fold
1–128-fold

1

3.8%

0
0NA
0

0

NA
JMC120-2-5
iso-Ch5
0.12553–8-fold0NA2–32-fold
1–128-fold
360%2–16-fold
1–64-fold
360%
JMC120-1-6
iso-Ch5R
0.125172–4-fold
2–8-fold
1–16-fold
3–32-fold
2–64-fold
635%2–4-fold,
1–8-fold
1–16-fold
5–64-fold
635%1–4-fold,
2–8-fold
3–16-fold
2–32-fold
1-64-fold
635%
SMC60-3-4
Ch5 mono
0.250122–2-fold
3–16-fold
4–32-fold
2–64-fold
975%1–4-fold
1–8-fold
4–16-fold
1–32-fold
1–64-fold
1–128-fold
758.3%1–8-fold
3–16-fold
1–64-fold
3–128-fold
1–256-fold
866.7%
SMC60-2-5
Ch5 mono
0.250202–2-fold
2–4-fold
1–8-fold
2–16-fold
3–32-fold
525%1–8-fold
3–16-fold
1–32-fold
2–64-fold
2–128-fold
840%2–4-fold
1–8-fold
1–32-fold
2–128-fold
3–256-fold
630%
* For the origin of caspofungin-adapted mutants see Table S1. ** Each strain was seeded as 3 technical replicates (~108 colony forming units/plate) on YPD solid medium supplemented with CAS. After the number of colonies with increased MIC was determined for each of 3 plates, the frequencies were calculated for each plate and subsequently averaged. CAS, MFG, ANI—refers to caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin, correspondingly. NA—Not Applicable. Additionally, see Figure 3 and Figure S3.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Husain, F.; Yadav, A.; Sah, S.K.; Hayes, J.J.; Rustchenko, E. Candida albicans Strains Adapted to Caspofungin Due to Aneuploidy Become Highly Tolerant under Continued Drug Pressure. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010023

AMA Style

Husain F, Yadav A, Sah SK, Hayes JJ, Rustchenko E. Candida albicans Strains Adapted to Caspofungin Due to Aneuploidy Become Highly Tolerant under Continued Drug Pressure. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(1):23. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Husain, Farha, Anshuman Yadav, Sudisht K. Sah, Jeffrey J. Hayes, and Elena Rustchenko. 2023. "Candida albicans Strains Adapted to Caspofungin Due to Aneuploidy Become Highly Tolerant under Continued Drug Pressure" Microorganisms 11, no. 1: 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010023

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop