Next Article in Journal
Microplastics Derived from Food Packaging Waste—Their Origin and Health Risks
Next Article in Special Issue
Magnetic States and Electronic Properties of Manganese-Based Intermetallic Compounds Mn2YAl and Mn3Z (Y = V, Cr, Fe, Co, Ni; Z = Al, Ge, Sn, Si, Pt)
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation on the Performance of Coated Carbide Tool during Dry Turning of AISI 4340 Alloy Steel
Previous Article in Special Issue
Crystallographic Features of Phase Transformations during the Continuous Cooling of a Ti6Al4V Alloy from the Single-Phase β-Region
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 16
Issue 2
10.3390/ma16020672
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Martensitic Transformation Temperatures and Hall Effect in Ni47−xMn41+xIn12 (x = 0, 1, 2) Alloys

by
Vyacheslav V. Marchenkov
,
Sabina M. Emelyanova
* and
Elena B. Marchenkova
M.N. Mikheev Institute of Metal Physics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 620108 Ekaterinburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(2), 672; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020672
Submission received: 2 November 2022 / Revised: 23 December 2022 / Accepted: 30 December 2022 / Published: 10 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phase Transformation and Properties of Metals and Alloys)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
At present, the question of the relationship between the characteristic martensitic transformation temperatures (MTT) and the electronic parameters of a system has not been fully studied. In the present work, an attempt to establish a similar relationship using the example of the concentration of charge carriers, n, was made. The field dependences of Hall resistivity ρH and magnetization M of the magnetocaloric Ni47−xMn41+xIn12 (x = 0, 1, 2) alloys were measured at T = 4.2 K and in magnetic fields of up to 80 kOe. The MTT were obtained from the temperature dependences of electrical resistivity and magnetization. It was observed that the MTT correlate strongly with both the valence electron concentration e/a and the electronic transport characteristics, which are the coefficient of the normal (NHE) R0 and anomalous (AHE) RS Hall effect and the concentration of charge carriers n.

1. Introduction

Despite the fact that Heusler alloys were discovered by F. Heusler in 1903, the synthesis and study of their physical properties are still of great interest [1]. This is largely due to the fact that many unusual phenomena, states, and useful functional properties can be observed in Heusler alloys: half-metallic ferromagnetism [2], the state of a spin gapless semiconductor [3], topological semimetals [4,5,6], large thermoelectric effect, and unusual thermal properties [7,8,9], shape memory effect [10,11,12], magnetocaloric effect (MCE) [13,14,15,16], etc. Most of these phenomena arise due to the peculiarities of their crystal and electronic structure and the magnetic state.
If the role of the parameters of the crystal structure, electronic and magnetic characteristics in the formation of the states of a half-metallic ferromagnet, a spin gapless semiconductor, and a topological semimetal has been studied in sufficient detail [5], then the relationship between the parameters of the electronic structure and shape memory effects and MCE has not been studied enough, since such information is practically absent in the modern scientific literature.
Heusler alloys with a large MCE, which, as a rule, is observed near the martensitic transformation temperatures (MTT) [17], are of particular practical interest. Despite the huge number of publications in this area, there are still plenty of unresolved problems. For example, it is known that there is a certain correlation between the MTT and the parameter e/a, where e is the number of valence electrons, and a is the number of atoms in the unit cell. As a rule, the values of MTT increase with an increase in the parameter e/a [18,19]. However, there are some cases when MTT decreases with an increase in e/a [20,21] or such dependences are not monotonous [22,23]. This is largely because the size of the unit cell can be different at the same value of e/a. This leads to the situation when, even at the same e/a, the electron density N, i.e., the number of valence electrons per cell, can be different [24].
For the first time, this circumstance was noticed in [24], where nonmonotonic dependences of MTT on e/a and the volume of the unit cell Vcell were observed, but “good” monotonic changes of MTT on the electron density N were observed. Note that in [24], the parameters of the crystal lattice, and then Vcell, were determined from X-ray data at room temperature; however, as a rule, alloys are in a two-phase state, i.e., they contain both austenitic and martensitic phases [25]. In addition, the structure and physical properties of compounds of the same composition can vary greatly depending on the method of preparation [26,27,28].
Thus, the question arises of finding the electronic parameters of a system that characterize this specific compound and that can be measured experimentally for it. Apparently, such a parameter should also correlate with the MTT. In our opinion, the concentration of current carriers n could be such a parameter.
Heusler alloys based on Ni-Mn-In were selected as the objects of this study, because martensitic transformations are observed in them near room temperature (see, for example, [14]), i.e., the austenitic and martensitic phases coexist. Heusler alloys based on the Ni-Mn-In system have a unique feature: they can simultaneously realize both direct and reverse MCE at room temperature [29]. Moreover, they are very sensitive to element substitution and stoichiometric variations. For example, in [30], for the Ni50Mn35In15 alloy, a giant value of the isothermal entropy change ΔS = 35.8 J/(kg·K) (H = 50 kOe) was found, but in [31], it was shown that in the alloys based on Ni50Mn35In15−xSix (1 ≤ x ≤ 5), the largest ΔS value (this is the largest value of the inverse MCE of all the alloys ever studied) was found in the Ni50Mn35In12Si3 alloy, for which ΔS = 124 J/(kg·K) at the temperature T = 239 K (H = 50 kOe). The Hall effect in Ni-Mn-In-based alloys was studied for the first time in 2009 [32]. In [33], the main type of charge carrier was determined (electrons) for the Ni-Mn-In-Si alloys. Despite the fact that the Hall effect in Ni-Mn-In-based alloys [33,34,35] has been investigated in the modern literature, there is practically no data on the relationship between MTT and electronic characteristics, in particular, the concentration of current carriers n, with the exception of the report [36]. The Heusler alloys with compositions Ni47−xMn41+xIn12 (x = 0, 1, 2) were particularly chosen, since the magnetostructural phase transition as well as MCE were observed in these alloys [37].
Thus, the aim of this work is to study the Hall effect and evaluate the concentration of charge carriers n, looking for the relationship between the MTT and parameter n in the Ni47−xMn41+xIn12 (x = 0, 1, 2) Heusler alloys.

2. Materials and Methods

The polycrystalline alloys were melted in an arc furnace in an inert argon atmosphere. Then, the alloys were annealed according to the following regime: exposure at 1100 K for 24 h, followed by cooling with a furnace. The samples for research were cut from the obtained ingots using electric spark cutting. The elemental analysis was carried out on a Quanta-200 Pegasus (FEI Company, Eindhoven, the Netherlands) scanning electron microscope equipped with EDAX (Energy Dispersive X-ray Analyser) spectrometer and EBSD (Electron Backscattered Diffraction) system. XRD analysis was performed at room temperature at the Center of Collective Use, M.N. Mikheev Institute of Metal Physics, UB RAS. X-ray diffraction phase analysis was carried out at room temperature; the range of angles varied from 30° to 100° (Figure 1).
As a result of X-ray diffraction studies, it was found that all alloys are in a two-phase state, i.e., the austenite and martensite phases are simultaneously present in the structure of the alloys (Table 1).
The magnetization was measured in magnetic fields of up to 70 kOe at 4.2 K and in the temperature range from 50 to 330 K. The electrical resistivity and the Hall effect were measured using the standard four-probe method at direct current in the temperature range from 75 to 375 K and at 4.2 K in magnetic fields of up to 80 kOe, respectively. All samples for measuring the Hall effect were in the form of plates with dimensions 0.5 mm × 1.5 mm × 4.5 mm; thus, the ratio of dimensions 1:3:9 is fulfilled (demagnetization factor F = 1).

3. Results and Discussion

Using electron microscopy, it was established (Figure 2) that in all alloys, martensite has a predominant morphology in the form of a packet-pyramidal hierarchy of finely twinned coherent crystals. Two morphological types of martensite crystals are distinguished: pairwise twinned lamellar martensite within the package (A) and truss-shaped pairwise twinned martensite with wedge-shaped conjugations of adjacent crystals (B). The formation of a hierarchy of twinned martensite crystals is due to their coherent adaptation and the minimization of elastic energy during thermoelastic martensitic transformation.
Elemental analysis of the composition of the investigated alloys was carried out along the edges and in the center of the sample; in each case, three measurements were made (Table 2). The examination of the elemental analysis showed that the real composition of all alloys corresponded to the specified with good accuracy.
Figure 3 shows the temperature dependences of electroresistivity ρ(T). It can be seen that at low temperatures, the resistivity value for all alloys is ~(170–260) μΩ cm. With increasing temperature, the resistivity drops sharply, decreasing to values of ~(95–120) μΩ cm. In this case, temperature hysteresis is observed in ρ(T) dependences, which may indicate the implementation of a first-order phase transition in the alloys studied [37]. This behavior of resistivity can be explained by the fact that at low temperatures, there is a large amount of martensite. Electron scattering on martensite leads to a large contribution to resistivity [38,39,40]. With temperature, the amount of the martensite phase decreases, and consequently, the resistivity decreases [38,39,40].
Figure 4 shows the temperature dependences of magnetization for the alloys. These dependences were measured in the magnetic field H = 1 kOe upon cooling and heating (in the figure shown by arrows). It is obvious that for all investigated alloys, the form of these dependences is typical. Obviously, the M(T) curves exhibit minima and maxima, along with the hysteresis in the region of phase transformation temperatures (AS, AF, MS, MF).
On heating, the transition of paramagnetic martensite to ferromagnetic austenite occurs, which is accompanied by a jump in magnetization.
The MTT were determined from the M(T) and ρ(T) dependences using the method of tangents [41]; the values obtained are shown in Table 3. The calculation of the valence electron concentration e/a for the unit cell was carried out according to Equation (1) [42]:
e / a = ( C A × Z A ) + ( C B × Z B ) + ( C D × Z D ) ,
where CA, CB, and CD are concentrations of elements A, B, and D, and ZA, ZB, and ZD are the number of external (valence) electrons for the elements A, B, and D. For nickel, manganese, and indium atoms, the number of valence electrons is 10 (3d84s2), 7 (3d64s1), and 3 (5s25p1), respectively. The values of e/a are 7.87, 7.9, and 7.93 for Ni45Mn43In12, Ni46Mn42In12, and Ni47Mn41In12 alloys, respectively.
It is obvious that with a decrease in the nickel content, a decrease in the valence electron concentration e/a occurs, and in addition, a shift of the martensitic transformation to the region of low temperatures is observed. Similar behavior was observed in the Ni2+xMn1−xGa [43,44] and Ni0.5Mn0.5−xSnx (x = 0.05; 0.10; 0.13; 0.15) alloys [45]. A decrease in MTT leads to an expansion of the existence region of the austenite phase since the austenite magnetization is greater than the martensite one. The same situation is observed for alloys of the Ni-Mn-Sb system, in contrast to the Ni-Mn-Ga system, in which the saturation magnetization of the martensitic phase is higher than that of the austenitic phase [46].
Due to the fact that the investigated alloys Ni47−xMn41+xIn12 (x = 0; 1; 2) are in a ferromagnetic state at low temperatures, at T = 4.2 K, both normal and anomalous Hall effects will be observed in them. The separation of the normal and anomalous components of the Hall effect was carried out using ρH(H) (Figure 5) and M(H) (Figure 6) dependences. It is obvious that the above-mentioned dependences have two well-distinguishable regions of magnetic fields: the region of technical magnetization (H < 20 kOe) and the region of the paraprocess (at higher fields). All investigated alloys at H > 20 kOe approach saturation. In this region of magnetic fields, the process of technical magnetization practically ends, and the alloys pass into a single-domain state.
The coefficients of normal R0 and anomalous RS Hall effect were determined using Equation (2) from the field dependences of ρH(H) and M(H) in the region of the paraprocess:
ρ H H = R 0 + 4 π R S * M H ,
where R S * = R s + ( 1 − F ) × R 0 , and F is a demagnetization factor, which equals 1 for the samples studied; hence, R S * ≈ R S in our case. The first term in Equation (2) describes the normal Hall effect (NHE), which is caused by the action of the Lorentz force on the charge carriers and is proportional to the applied magnetic field. The second term in Equation (2) is determined by the so-called anomalous Hall effect (AHE), related to the influence of spin-orbit interaction (SOI).
The concentration of current carriers n was determined using Equation (3):
R 0 = 1 n e c ,
where c is the light velocity and e is the charge of the electron.
Figure 5 and Figure 6 show that Equation (2) is valid for all investigated alloys in high magnetic fields (H > 20 kOe). The NHE R0 and AHE RS coefficients were obtained using ρH(H) (Figure 5) and M(H) (Figure 6) dependences, and Equation (2). The results obtained are presented in Table 4 and Figure 7.
The dependences of the NHE and AHE coefficients on the valence electron concentration e/a for the Ni47−xMn41+xIn12 (x = 0; 1; 2) alloys are shown in Figure 8. Obviously, the NHE coefficient is negative; therefore, electrons are the main type of charge carriers. In contrast, the AHE coefficient is positive; its absolute value exceeds the values for NHE by 3 orders of magnitude. Both NHE and AHE decrease with the growth of e/a ratio. The results obtained are in qualitative agreement with the results for the Ni-Mn-Sb system alloys [36].
Accurate determination of the concentration of charge carriers in Heusler alloys is a rather challenging task, since this requires the data on the Fermi surface topology of the investigated alloy, as well as the data on the mobility of charge carriers belonging to certain sheets of the Fermi surface. This is due to the fact that the Fermi surface of Heusler alloys has a complex topology and contains sheets of both electron and hole types. However, in [47,48], it was shown that even in complex compounds, using a one-band model for estimating the concentration of charge carriers makes it possible to qualitatively track the changes in the electronic characteristics. Taking the above into account, the one-band model [49] was also used in this paper.
The dependence between MTT and the concentration of charge carriers is shown in Figure 9. It is obvious that the values of MTT decrease monotonically with an increase in the concentration of charge carriers n. Considering that a similar dependence was observed for the Ni-Mn-Sb system alloys [36], it can be assumed that such dependence can also be observed in other alloys with a magnetocaloric effect.
It is known that the magnetic shape memory effect (MSME) and the large MCE in Heusler alloys are strongly associated with the magnetostructural transformations and manifest themselves the most near the phase transformation temperatures, in particular, near MTT. The crystal structure and magnetic and electronic subsystems in Heusler compounds are strongly interconnected and dependent on each other. Even quite small changes of about 1–2 at.% in the Ni/Mn ratio in our Ni47−xMn41+xIn12 alloys (x = 0, 1, 2) lead to huge changes in MTT values (Table 3), electrical resistivity (Figure 3), and magnetization values (Figure 4). What is the reason for such drastic changes? One possible explanation could be a change in the density of electronic states (DOS) at the Fermi level EF, and/or a shift of EF with a change in the Ni/Mn ratio. It is obvious that a change in DOS at EF will lead to a change in the electronic kinetic coefficients and parameters, particularly in the concentration of current carriers n. To verify this assumption, it is desirable to carry out calculations of the electronic band structure for the alloys studied in this paper.
In the present paper, the Hall effect was studied at the temperature T = 4.2 K, while the MTT values were in the region of higher temperatures. To accurately determine the parameters of the electronic subsystem and establish their relationship with MTT, it is necessary to study the Hall effect and other electronic transport properties at temperatures comparable to MTT. However, in the present paper, as in [36], a relationship between MTT and the concentration of charge carriers n was established.
It is important to note Ref. [50], where Ni55−xCoxFe18Ga27 (x = 6, 10, 12, 15, 20) single-crystalline fibers with a Heusler structure L21 were studied. The unusual non-hysteretic superelasticity of NiCoFeGa single crystals was observed. It was suggested that the supercritical elasticity originates from a continuous phase transition [50]. It should be noted that in our Ni-Mn-In alloys, the concentration of charge carriers n and MTT increase with an increase in e/a. Taking into account Ref. [50], it is quite interesting to follow the change of e/a to maximum possible values from the point of existence of first-order martensitic transformation.

4. Conclusions

Thus, it was found that the values of the coefficient of the NHE R0 are negative for all investigated alloys; therefore, electrons are the main charge carriers. In addition, the R0 values increase with an increase in the nickel content in the alloy, i.e., as the valence electron concentration e/a increases. The coefficients of the AHE RS turned out to be positive, and their values increased with increasing e/a as well. It was found that as the values of e/a increase, the concentration of charge carriers n as well as the MTT increase. Thus, as a result of this work, for the alloys studied, a relationship between the concentration of charge carriers n and MTT was found; that is, MTT increases with the growth of n.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.V.M. and S.M.E.; methodology, V.V.M. and E.B.M.; investigation, V.V.M., S.M.E. and E.B.M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M.E.; writing—review and editing, V.V.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the state assignment of the Ministry of Science and High Education of the Russian Federation (theme “Spin” No. 122021000036-3).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tavares, S.; Yang, K.; Meyers, M.A. Heusler alloys: Past, properties, new alloys, and prospects. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2023, 132, 101017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Katsnelson, M.I.; Irkhin, V.Y.; Chioncel, L.; Lichtenstein, A.I.; De Groot, R.A. Half-metallic ferromagnets: From band structure to many-body effects. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2008, 80, 315–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Wang, X.; Li, T.; Cheng, Z.; Wang, X.-L.; Chen, H. Recent advances in Dirac spin-gapless semiconductors. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2018, 5, 041103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Manna, K.; Sun, Y.; Muechler, L.; Kübler, J.; Felser, C. Heusler, Weyl and Berry. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018, 3, 244–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Marchenkov, V.V.; Irkhin, V.Y. Half-metallic ferromagnets, spin gapless semiconductors and topological semimetals based on Heusler alloys: Theory and experiment. Phys. Met. Metallogr. 2021, 122, 1133–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Marchenkov, V.V.; Irkhin, V.Y.; Semiannikova, A.A. Unusual kinetic properties of usual Heusler alloys. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2022, 35, 2153–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhu, H.; He, R.; Mao, J.; Zhu, Q.; Li, C.; Sun, J.; Ren, W.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Tang, Z.; et al. Discovery of ZrCoBi based half Heuslers with high thermoelectric conversion efficiency. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Berche, A.; Jund, P. Fully Ab-Inito determination of the thermoelectric properties of half-Heusler NiTiSn: Crucial role of interstitial Ni defects. Materials 2018, 11, 868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Zhu, H.; Mao, J.; Li, Y.; Sun, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Li, G.; Song, Q.; Zhou, J.; Fu, Y.; et al. Discovery of TaFeSb-based half-Heuslers with high thermoelectric performance. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Pushin, V.; Korolyov, A.; Kuranova, N.; Marchenkova, E.; Ustyugov, Y. New Metastable Baro-and Deformation-Induced Phases in Ferromagnetic Shape Memory Ni2MnGa-Based Alloys. Materials 2022, 115, 2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Khan, R.A.A.; Ghomashchi, R.; Xie, Z.; Chen, L. Ferromagnetic shape memory Heusler materials: Synthesis, microstructure characterization and magnetostructural properties. Materials 2018, 11, 988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Kuchin, D.S.; Dilmieva, E.T.; Koshkid’ko, Y.S.; Kamantsev, A.P.; Koledov, V.V.; Mashirov, A.V.; Shavrov, V.G.; Cwik, J.; Rogacki, K.; Khovaylo, V.V. Direct measurement of shape memory effect for Ni54Mn21Ga25, Ni50Mn41.2In8.8 Heusler alloys in high magnetic field. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 482, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Qiao, K.; Liang, Y.; Zuo, S.; Zhang, C.; Yu, Z.; Long, Y.; Hu, F.; Shen, B.; Zhang, H. Regulation of Magnetocaloric Effect in Ni40Co10Mn40Sn10 Alloys by Using a Homemade Uniaxial Strain Pressure Cell. Materials 2022, 15, 4331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Krenke, T.; Duman, E.; Acet, M.; Wassermann, E.F.; Moya, X.; Mañosa, L.; Planes, A.; Suard, E.; Ouladdiaf, B. Magnetic superelasticity and inverse magnetocaloric effect in Ni-Mn-In. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 75, 104414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Yao, Y.; Xu, J.; Han, Z.; Fang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, C.; Qian, B.; Jiang, X. Effect of Ti doping on the phase transitions, magnetocaloric effect and exchange bias in Ni43Mn46Sn11−xTix Heusler alloys. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2020, 498, 166216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guha, S.; Datta, S.; Panda, S.K.; Kar, M. Room temperature magneto-caloric effect and electron transport properties study on Ni2.14Mn0.55Sb1.31 alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 843, 156033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sharma, V.K.; Chattopadhyay, M.K.; Kumar, R.; Ganguli, T.; Tiwari, P.; Roy, S.B. Magnetocaloric effect in Heusler alloys Ni50Mn34In16 and Ni50Mn34Sn16. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2007, 19, 496207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Han, Z.D.; Wang, D.H.; Zhang, C.L.; Xuan, H.C.; Zhang, J.R.; Gu, B.X.; Du, Y.W. Effect of lattice contraction on martensitic transformation and magnetocaloric effect in Ge doped Ni-Mn-Sn alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2009, 157, 40–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chernenko, V.A. Compositional instability of β-phase in Ni-Mn-Ga alloys. Scr. Mater. 1999, 40, 523–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, Z.H.; Zhang, M.; Wang, W.Q.; Wang, W.H.; Chen, J.L.; Wu, G.H.; Meng, F.B.; Liu, H.Y.; Liu, B.D.; Qu, J.P.; et al. Magnetic properties and martensitic transformation in quaternary Heusler alloy of NiMnFeGa. J. Appl. Phys. 2002, 92, 5006–5010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, Z.; Wu, Z.; Yang, H.; Liu, Y.; Liu, E.; Zhang, H.; Wu, G. Thermal and stress-induced martensitic transformations in quaternary Ni50Mn37(In,Sb)13 ferromagnetic shape memory alloys. Intermetallics 2010, 18, 1690–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gao, B.; Shen, J.; Hu, F.X.; Wang, J.; Sun, J.R.; Shen, B.G. Magnetic properties and magnetic entropy change in Heusler alloys Ni50Mn35−xCuxSn15. Appl. Phys. A 2009, 97, 443–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kanomata, T.; Nozawa, T.; Kikuchi, D.; Nishihara, H.; Koyama, K.; Watanabe, K. Magnetic properties of ferromagnetic shape memory alloys Ni2−xCuxMnGa. Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mech. 2005, 21, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, R.L.; Yan, J.B.; Xiao, H.B.; Xu, L.S.; Marchenkov, V.V.; Xu, L.F.; Yang, C.P. Effect of electron density on the martensitic transition in Ni–Mn–Sn alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 6834–6837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Aksoy, S.; Acet, M.; Wassermann, E.F.; Krenke, T.; Moya, X.; Mañosa, L.; Planes, A.; Deen, P.P. Structural properties and magnetic interactions in martensitic Ni-Mn-Sb alloys. Philos. Mag. 2009, 89, 2093–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Novikov, A.; Gan’shina, E.; Granovsky, A.; Zhukov, A.; Chernenko, V. Magneto-optical spectroscopy of Heusler alloys: Bulk samples, thin films and microwires. Solid State Phenom. 2012, 190, 335–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kudruavtsev, Y.V.; Perekos, A.E.; Melnik, A.K.; Skirta, Y.B. Effect of crystalline structure on some physical properties of bulk and thin film Ni50Mn35In15 alloy samples. Met. Adv. Technol. 2019, 41, 1549–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jiráskova, Y.; Buršík, J.; Janičkovič, D.; Životský, O. Influence of preparation technology on microstructural and magnetic properties of Fe2MnSi and Fe2MnAl Heusler alloys. Materials 2019, 12, 710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kazakov, A.P.; Prudnikov, V.N.; Granovsky, A.B.; Zhukov, A.P.; Gonzalez, J.; Dubenko, I.; Pathak, A.K.; Stadler, S.; Ali, N. Direct measurements of field-induced adiabatic temperature changes near compound phase transitions in Ni-Mn-In based Heusler alloys. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 131911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Pathak, A.K.; Khan, M.; Dubenko, I.; Stadler, S.; Ali, N. Large magnetic entropy change in Ni50Mn50−xInx Heusler alloys. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90, 262504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pathak, A.K.; Dubenko, I.; Stadler, S.; Ali, N. The effect of partial substitution of In by Si on the phase transitions and respective magnetic entropy changes of Ni50Mn35In15 Heusler alloy. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2008, 41, 202004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dubenko, I.; Pathak, A.K.; Stadler, S.; Ali, N.; Kovarskii, Y.; Prudnikov, V.N.; Perov, N.S.; Granovsky, A.B. Giant Hall effect in Ni-Mn-In Heusler alloys. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80, 092408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Granovskii, A.B.; Prudnikov, V.N.; Kazakov, A.P.; Zhukov, A.P.; Dubenko, I.S. Determination of the normal and anomalous Hall effect coefficients in ferromagnetic Ni50Mn35In15−xSix Heusler alloys at the martensitic transformation. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 2012, 115, 805–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dubenko, I.; Pathak, A.K.; Ali, N.; Kovarskii, Y.; Prudnikov, V.N.; Perov, N.S.; Granovsky, A.B. Magnetotransport properties of Ni-Mn-In Heusler alloys: Giant Hall angle. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2010, 200, 052005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Prudnikov, V.N.; Kazakov, A.P.; Titov, I.S.; Perov, N.S.; Granovskii, A.B.; Dubenko, I.S.; Pathak, A.K.; Ali, N.; Zhukov, A.P.; Gonzalez, J. Hall effect in a martensitic transformation in Ni-Co-Mn-In Heusler alloys. JEPT Lett. 2010, 92, 666–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Marchenkov, V.V.; Emelyanova, S.M. Low-temperature Hall effect and martensitic transition temperatures in magnetocaloric Ni50Mn35Sb15−xGex (x = 0, 1, 3) alloys. Low Temp. Phys. 2021, 47, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. González-Legarreta, L.; González-Alonso, D.; Rosa, W.O.; Caballero-Flores, R.; Suñol, J.J.; González, J.; Hernando, B. Magnetostructural phase transition in off-stoichiometric Ni–Mn–In Heusler alloy ribbons with low In content. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2015, 383, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sharma, V.K.; Chattopadhyay, M.K.; Shaeb, K.H.B.; Chouhan, A.; Roy, S.B. Large magnetoresistance in Ni50Mn34In16 alloy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89, 222509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vasiliev, A.N.; Heczko, O.; Volkova, O.S.; Vasilchikova, T.N.; Voloshok, T.N.; Klimov, K.V.; Ito, W.; Kainuma, R.; Ishida, K.; Oikawa, K.; et al. On the electronic origin of the inverse magnetocaloric effect in Ni-Co-Mn-In Heusler alloys. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2010, 43, 055004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, B.M.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, B.C.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, H. Strong thermal-history-dependent magnetoresistance behavior in Ni49,5Mn34,5In16. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 106, 063909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kuranova, N.N.; Pushin, A.V.; Uksusnikov, A.N.; Belosludtseva, E.S.; Kourov, N.I.; Kuntsevich, T.E.; Pushin, V.G. Fine structure and mechanical properties of the shape-memory Ni50Ti32Hf18 alloy rapidly quenched by spinning. Tech. Phys. 2017, 62, 1189–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bao, B.; Long, Y.; Duan, J.F.; Shi, P.J.; Wu, G.H.; Ye, R.C.; Chang, Y.Q.; Zhang, J.; Rong, C.B. Phase transition processes and magnetocaloric effect in Ni2.15Mn0.85−xCoxGa alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103, 07B335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vasil’ev, A.N.; Bozhko, A.D.; Khovailo, V.V.; Dikshtein, I.E.; Shavrov, V.G.; Buchelnikov, V.D.; Matsumoto, M.; Suzuki, S.; Takagi, T.; Tani, J. Structural and magnetic phase transitions in shape-memory alloys Ni2+xMn1−xGa. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 1113–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, W.H.; Hu, F.X.; Chen, J.L.; Li, Y.X.; Wang, Z.; Gao, Z.Y.; Zheng, Y.F.; Zhao, L.C.; Wu, G.H.; Zan, W.S. Magnetic properties and structural phase transformations of NiMnGa alloys. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2001, 37, 2715–2717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Krenke, T.; Acet, M.; Wassermann, E.F.; Moya, X.; Mañosa, L.; Planes, A. Magnetic transitions and the nature of ferromagnetism in the austenitic and martensitic states of Ni-Mn-Sn alloys. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 72, 014412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Gonzàlez-Comas, A.; Obradó, E.; Mañosa, L.; Planes, A.; Chernenko, V.A.; Hattink, B.J.; Labarta, A. Premartensitic and martensitic phase transitions in ferromagnetic Ni2MnGa. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 60, 7085–7090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Marchenkov, V.V.; Irkhin, V.Y.; Perevozchikova, Y.A.; Terent’ev, P.B.; Semiannikova, A.A.; Marchenkobva, E.B.; Eisterer, M. Kinetic properties and half-metallic magnetism in Mn2YAl Heusler alloys. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 2019, 128, 919–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Marchenkov, V.V.; Kourov, N.I.; Irkhin, V.Y. Half-metallic ferromagnets and spin gapless semiconductors. Phys. Met. Metallogr. 2018, 119, 1321–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Lifshits, I.M.; Azbel, M.Y.; Kaganov, M.I. Electron Theory of Metals; Consultants Bureau: New York, NY, USA, 1973; pp. 109–125. [Google Scholar]
  50. Chen, H.; Wang, Y.-D.; Nie, Z.; Li, R.; Cong, D.; Liu, W.; Ye, F.; Liu, Y.; Cao, P.; Tian, F.; et al. Unprecedented non-hysteretic superelasticity of [001]-oriented NiCoFeGa single crystals. Nat. Mater. 2020, 19, 712–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 16 00672 g001 550
Figure 1. XRD patterns for Ni45Mn43In12, Ni46Mn42In12, and Ni47Mn41In12 alloys at room temperature. Here, A and M are austenite and martensite, respectively. On the right panel, the XRD pattern of Ni46Mn42In12 alloy is represented. The splitting of (220) austenite reflection onto the (220) and (202, 022) martensite reflections is shown by the dotted line.
Figure 1. XRD patterns for Ni45Mn43In12, Ni46Mn42In12, and Ni47Mn41In12 alloys at room temperature. Here, A and M are austenite and martensite, respectively. On the right panel, the XRD pattern of Ni46Mn42In12 alloy is represented. The splitting of (220) austenite reflection onto the (220) and (202, 022) martensite reflections is shown by the dotted line.
Materials 16 00672 g001
Materials 16 00672 g002 550
Figure 2. Electron microscopy images of the martensite structures in the alloys at room temperature: (a) Ni45Mn43In12, (b) Ni46Mn42In12, (c) Ni47Mn41In12. The letters A and B denote different morphological types of martensitic crystals.
Figure 2. Electron microscopy images of the martensite structures in the alloys at room temperature: (a) Ni45Mn43In12, (b) Ni46Mn42In12, (c) Ni47Mn41In12. The letters A and B denote different morphological types of martensitic crystals.
Materials 16 00672 g002
Materials 16 00672 g003 550
Figure 3. Temperature dependences of electrical resistivity ρ(T): (a) Ni45Mn43In12, (b) Ni46Mn42In12, (c) Ni47Mn41In12.
Figure 3. Temperature dependences of electrical resistivity ρ(T): (a) Ni45Mn43In12, (b) Ni46Mn42In12, (c) Ni47Mn41In12.
Materials 16 00672 g003
Materials 16 00672 g004a 550Materials 16 00672 g004b 550
Figure 4. Temperature dependences of magnetization M(T) in the magnetic field H = 1 kOe: (a) Ni45Mn43In12, (b) Ni46Mn42In12, (c) Ni47Mn41In12.
Figure 4. Temperature dependences of magnetization M(T) in the magnetic field H = 1 kOe: (a) Ni45Mn43In12, (b) Ni46Mn42In12, (c) Ni47Mn41In12.
Materials 16 00672 g004aMaterials 16 00672 g004b
Materials 16 00672 g005 550
Figure 5. Field dependences of the Hall resistivity ρH(H) at T = 4.2 K: (a) Ni45Mn43In12, (b) Ni46Mn42In12, (c) Ni47Mn41In12.
Figure 5. Field dependences of the Hall resistivity ρH(H) at T = 4.2 K: (a) Ni45Mn43In12, (b) Ni46Mn42In12, (c) Ni47Mn41In12.
Materials 16 00672 g005
Materials 16 00672 g006a 550Materials 16 00672 g006b 550
Figure 6. Field dependences of magnetization M(H) at T = 4.2 K: (a) Ni45Mn43In12, (b) Ni46Mn42In12, (c) Ni47Mn41In12.
Figure 6. Field dependences of magnetization M(H) at T = 4.2 K: (a) Ni45Mn43In12, (b) Ni46Mn42In12, (c) Ni47Mn41In12.
Materials 16 00672 g006aMaterials 16 00672 g006b
Materials 16 00672 g007 550
Figure 7. Dependences of ρH(H) on M/H for Ni47−xMn41+xIn12 (x = 0; 1; 2) alloys at T = 4.2 K: green circles—Ni45Mn43In12, blue circles—Ni46Mn42In12, red circles—Ni47Mn41In12.
Figure 7. Dependences of ρH(H) on M/H for Ni47−xMn41+xIn12 (x = 0; 1; 2) alloys at T = 4.2 K: green circles—Ni45Mn43In12, blue circles—Ni46Mn42In12, red circles—Ni47Mn41In12.
Materials 16 00672 g007
Materials 16 00672 g008 550
Figure 8. Dependences of the normal R0 (a) and anomalous RS (b) Hall coefficients on the e/a ratio: green circle—Ni45Mn43In12, blue circle—Ni46Mn42In12, red circle—Ni47Mn41In12.
Figure 8. Dependences of the normal R0 (a) and anomalous RS (b) Hall coefficients on the e/a ratio: green circle—Ni45Mn43In12, blue circle—Ni46Mn42In12, red circle—Ni47Mn41In12.
Materials 16 00672 g008
Materials 16 00672 g009 550
Figure 9. Dependences of the MTT on the concentration of current carriers: green symbols—Ni45Mn43In12, blue symbols—Ni46Mn42In12, red symbols—Ni47Mn41In12; squares—AS, circles—AF, triangles—MS, rhombuses—MF.
Figure 9. Dependences of the MTT on the concentration of current carriers: green symbols—Ni45Mn43In12, blue symbols—Ni46Mn42In12, red symbols—Ni47Mn41In12; squares—AS, circles—AF, triangles—MS, rhombuses—MF.
Materials 16 00672 g009
Table
Table 1. Phase composition of the Ni47−xMn41+xIn12 (x = 0; 1; 2) alloys. The austenite and martensite phases are marked by A and M, respectively.
Table 1. Phase composition of the Ni47−xMn41+xIn12 (x = 0; 1; 2) alloys. The austenite and martensite phases are marked by A and M, respectively.
AlloyContent of Phases, at.%
Cubic (A)Tetragonal (M)
Ni45Mn43In1234.165.9
Ni46Mn42In1236.963.1
Ni47Mn41In1239.560.5
Table
Table 2. Chemical analysis results of the Ni47−xMn41+xIn12 (x = 0; 1; 2) alloys.
Table 2. Chemical analysis results of the Ni47−xMn41+xIn12 (x = 0; 1; 2) alloys.
AlloyContent of Each Element, at.%
NiMnIn
Ni45Mn43In1245.2142.7512.04
Ni46Mn42In1246.1141.7112.18
Ni47Mn41In1246.5841.1712.25
Table
Table 3. Phase transition temperatures for the Ni47−xMn41+xIn12 (x = 0; 1; 2) alloys. The temperatures at the beginning and end of austenitic (As, Af) and martensitic (Ms, Mf) transformation, respectively.
Table 3. Phase transition temperatures for the Ni47−xMn41+xIn12 (x = 0; 1; 2) alloys. The temperatures at the beginning and end of austenitic (As, Af) and martensitic (Ms, Mf) transformation, respectively.
AlloyAs, KAf, KMs, KMf, K
According to the temperature dependences of electrical resistivity ρ(T)
Ni45Mn43In12175275265148
Ni46Mn42In12260317308250
Ni47Mn41In12305323315298
According to the temperature dependences of magnetization M(T)
Ni45Mn43In12170265258148
Ni46Mn42In12263310307252
Ni47Mn41In12308318317302
Table
Table 4. The valence electron concentration e/a, normal R0, and anomalous RS Hall effect coefficients and concentration of charge carriers n for the Ni47−xMn41+xIn12 (x = 0; 1; 2) alloys.
Table 4. The valence electron concentration e/a, normal R0, and anomalous RS Hall effect coefficients and concentration of charge carriers n for the Ni47−xMn41+xIn12 (x = 0; 1; 2) alloys.
Alloye/aR0, 10−5 cm3/CRS, 10−2 cm3/Cn, 1023 1/cm3
Ni45Mn43In127.87−2.011.663.11
Ni46Mn42In127.9−1.692.193.69
Ni47Mn41In127.93−1.483.734.22
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marchenkov, V.V.; Emelyanova, S.M.; Marchenkova, E.B. Martensitic Transformation Temperatures and Hall Effect in Ni47−xMn41+xIn12 (x = 0, 1, 2) Alloys. Materials 2023, 16, 672. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020672

AMA Style

Marchenkov VV, Emelyanova SM, Marchenkova EB. Martensitic Transformation Temperatures and Hall Effect in Ni47−xMn41+xIn12 (x = 0, 1, 2) Alloys. Materials. 2023; 16(2):672. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020672

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marchenkov, Vyacheslav V., Sabina M. Emelyanova, and Elena B. Marchenkova. 2023. "Martensitic Transformation Temperatures and Hall Effect in Ni47−xMn41+xIn12 (x = 0, 1, 2) Alloys" Materials 16, no. 2: 672. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020672

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop