Next Article in Journal
Extraction of Rhenium and Osmium from Lead Technogenic Raw Materials of Copper Production
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Photon Interaction Parameters of Some Antioxidants for Food Irradiation Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Phase Composition Effects on Dynamic Behavior and Strain Rate Sensitivity in Metastable β-Ti Alloys
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Radiological Hazards and Natural Radionuclide Distribution in Granitic Rocks of Homrit Waggat Area, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt

1
Geology Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Cairo P.O. Box 11884, Egypt
2
Geological Sciences Department, National Research Centre, 33 El Bohooth St. (Former El Tahrir St.), Dokki, Giza P.O. Box 12622, Egypt
3
INPOLDE Research Center, Department of Chemistry, Physics and Environment, Faculty of Sciences and Environment, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 47 Domneasca Street, 800008 Galati, Romania
4
Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Assiut Branch, Assiut 71524, Egypt
5
Institute of Physics and Technology, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg 620002, Russia
6
Geology Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Assiut Branch, Assiut 71524, Egypt
7
Geochemical Exploration Department, Nuclear Materials Authority, El Maadi, Cairo P.O. Box 530, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(12), 4069; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124069
Submission received: 3 April 2022 / Revised: 27 May 2022 / Accepted: 3 June 2022 / Published: 8 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Effects of Radiation)

Abstract

:
Natural radioactivity, radiological hazard, and petrological studies of Homrit Waggat granitic rocks, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt were performed in order to assess their suitability as ornamental stone. On the basis of mineralogical and geochemical compositions, Homrit Waggat granitic rocks can be subdivided into two subclasses. The first class comprises granodiorite and tonalite (I-type) and is ascribed to volcanic arc, whereas the second one includes alkali-feldspar granite, syenogranite, and albitized granite with high-K calc alkaline character, which is related to post-orogenic granites. 238U, 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K activities of natural radionuclides occurring in the examined rocks were measured radiometrically using sodium iodide detector. Furthermore, assessment of the hazard indices—such as: annual effective dose (AED) with mean values (0.11, 0.09, 0.07, 0.05, and 0.03, standard value = 0.07); gamma radiation index (Iγ) with mean values (0.6, 0.5, 0.4, 0.3, and 0.14, standard value = 0.5); internal (Hin) with mean values (0.6, 0.5, 0.4, 0.3, and 0.2, standard value = 1.0); external (Hex) index (0.5, 0.4, 0.3, 0.24, and 0.12, standard value = 1.0); absorbed gamma dose rate (D) with mean values (86.4, 75.9, 53.5, 43.6, and 20.8, standard value = 57); and radium equivalent activity (Raeq) with mean values (180, 154, 106.6, 90.1, and 42.7, standard value = 370)—were evaluated with the knowledge of the natural radionuclides. The result of these indices falls within the acceptable worldwide limits. Therefore, we suggest that these rocks are safe to be used in industrial applications.

1. Introduction

Granitic rocks represent the most abundant plutonic rocks in the continental crust [1]. Their distribution in Arabian-Nubian Shield (ANS) is heterogeneous, since they are abundant in the northern ANS [2,3,4,5,6]. Granitic rocks cover about sixty percent of the Egyptian crystalline rocks in the Eastern Desert, which decreases to thirty percent in the south (Kenya and Ethiopia) of ANS [7,8]. Field, petrological, geochemical, and isotopic studies discriminate the Egyptian granitic rocks into older (850–610 Ma) and younger granites (610–550 Ma) [2,8]. The former (older) include calc-alkaline tonalite-granodiorite association (gray) of syn-orogenic rocks with I-type signature. In contrast, the younger assemblages (610–550 Ma) include pink, calc-alkaline to alkaline with late- (I-type) to post-orogenic (A-type) associations [8,9].
Accordingly, several studies reveal different petrogenesis of Egyptian granitic rocks, varying from syn-late-orogenic to post-orogenic as well as anorogenic granites. Among different granitic rocks, the post-orogenic and anorogenic granites have conspicuous rare metals enrichment that are commonly modified by later hydrothermal processes such as albitization, silicification, and fluoritization [9,10,11,12,13]. This rare metal mineralization includes Zr, Ta, Nb, and W as well as others, such as high contents of rare earth element (REE), U, and Th mineralization, attracting the attention of many geologists and authors to shed light on theses rocks, due to their importance in industrial applications [14].
On the other hand, natural radionuclides, including 238U, 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K are widely distributed in most felsic, potassic suites of igneous rocks (granitic rocks) [2,15]. These rocks are most adequate for various natural radionuclide occurrences [2]. There are strong relationships between radionuclides and volatile components such as chlorine and fluorine, where these radionuclides tend to concentrate in the most felsic rocks [2,16]. Cosmic radiation is considered the main source of external radiation and includes approximately 90% of high-energy protons. In addition, external radiation comes from the soil, rock materials, and building materials represented in natural chain decay of uranium series, thorium series, and 40K. The assessment of these natural radioactive elements permits estimation of radiation hazard indices and risks to human beings. Therefore, the level of radioactivity in any area is considered as an indicator for the hazard region that affects human health [2,15,16].
The current study aims to integrate field, petrographical, and geochemical studies of Homrit Waggat granites to clarify their different mineralogical composition and tectonic setting. In addition, for the first time, this study discusses the natural radioactivity as well as radiological health risk of different Homrit Waggat magmatic rocks in order to assess their suitability as ornamental stone.

2. Geologic Setting

Younger granitic rocks are abundant in Central Eastern Desert of Egypt relative to the southern part [2,10,17]. Multi magmatic phases of Homrit Waggat area lie ~50 km NW of Mersa Alam town (Figure 1a) that have been discussed by many authors, such as Azer et al. [10]. Volcano-sedimentary rocks and metagabbro-diorite complex of island-arc suite represent the oldest rocks in the studied area. The metagabbro-diorite complex exposes in the northern sector of the mapped area (Figure 1b) and intrudes the volcani-sedimentary rocks with sharp contacts.
Homrit Waggat granitic rocks can be classified into older and younger rocks based on geochronological sequence [10]. The former is oval, gray in color, fine-grained, and represented by small exfoliated and separated hills with low relief. They are intruded by dikes of different sizes and shapes. They include small xenoliths of gneiss occurring in several masses. In contrast, the younger granitic rocks are widely distributed, constituting an area of ~50 km2 and more than 1 km above sea level. They are exposed in the central part as two isolated wings forming an elliptical ring. They are medium-to-coarse-grained and pink in color; they intrude older granitic rocks and are invaded by pegmatite and quartz veins.

3. Material and Methods

Twenty-five samples were collected from the examined area. Fifteen samples were selected for petrographic investigations through thin sections that have been studied using a polarizing microscope. Five representative samples have been selected for bulk-rock geochemical analysis by XRF (X-ray fluorescence) at the National Research Center (NRC) in fused bead of the sample with a ratio of 1 g (sample)/10 g (lithium metaborate 34%/lithium tetraborate 66%) at 1150 °C in an electroconductive furnace. Detection of element concentrations was carried out with a sequential WD-XRF spectrometer and the ASTM D-7348 standard test method for loss on ignition (LOI).
238U, 232Th, 226Ra, and 40K were examined for variable rocks (15) samples by NaI (Tl) at the Nuclear Materials Authority, Egypt. The NaI detector advantages are its low cost, linear energy response, and flexibility in size and shape, while the main disadvantages are its poor energy resolution and response time. The best detector resolution is about 6% when measuring the 662 keV gamma ray from 137Cs. It is sealed assembly, which includes a NaI (Tl) crystal, coupled to PC-MCA Canberra Accuses. The cylindrical Pb shield detector (100 mm thick) with shielded fixed bottom and movable cover was used to reduce gamma ray background. This Pb shield contains an inner concentric cylinder of Cu (0.3 mm thick) in order to absorb the generated X-rays in the lead shield. The background distribution in the environment around the detector was determined using the same empty specification package, which was counted in the same manner and in the same geometry as the samples.

4. Petrography

Representative samples of the Homrit Waggat granitic rocks are investigated petrographically using a polarizing microscope. These rocks can be classified based on the mineralogical constituents into granodiorite, tonalite, syenogranite, alkali-feldspar granite, and albitized granite. Petrographic descriptions for these rock types are given below from the oldest to the youngest.
Tonalite is coarse-grained and comprised mainly of plagioclase, quartz, and biotite with a minor amount of potash feldspar. Two generations of quartz occur. The former is coarse-grained; they are fractured and exhibit undulose extension. The second is fine-grained and mostly fills the fracture between other constituents. Plagioclase occurs as tabular and coarse-grained and reveals extensive turbidity (saussuritization) surface as a result of deformation processes. Fine-grained hornblende occurs and is completely altered to chlorite.
Granodiorite is represented by medium grain with hypidiomorphic texture. It comprises plagioclase, K-feldspar, and quartz as essential minerals, whereas sphene, zircon, and apatite are the main accessories. Plagioclase occurs as tabular, subhedral crystals that reveal lamellar twinning. Occasionally, they show perfect zonation (Figure 2a) with slight turbidity due to kaolinitization and saussritization. K-feldspars are represented by patchy, anhedral, and turbid (kaolinitized) perthite. They are commonly corroded by quartz grains and enclose plagioclase crystals. Quartz occurs as fine-(interstitial)-to-medium grain with anhedral crystals. The main mafic mineral is biotite, which presents as subhedral flakes that are partially to completely altered to chlorite. Well-developed sphene (titanite) occurs in aggregates with sphenoidal (wedge) shape (Figure 2b). Scattered iron oxides also occur and are commonly associated with biotite.
Syenogranite is medium-tocoarse-grained with hypidiomorphic texture. These rocks consist mainly of K-feldspar, quartz, plagioclase, and biotite as essential minerals with iron oxide, allanite, and zircon as accessory minerals. K-feldspar is represented by microcline- and orthoclase-perthite. They reveal a slightly dusty surface as a result of kaolinitization and seritization. They are corroded by plagioclase and quartz. Occasionally, K-feldspar engulfs small biotite and plagioclase crystals. Micrographic texture occurs due to intergrowth between K-feldspar and quartz. Quartz exhibits a normal extension that is sometimes enclosed in plagioclase crystals. Plagioclase occurs as tabular and subhedral crystals. Biotite crystals are altered to chlorite and commonly host iron oxides (Figure 2c). Short minutes of zircon crystals are mostly hosted in mafic minerals.
Alkali feldspar granites are medium-to-coarse-grained with hypidiomorphic texture. Despite having the same mineralogical constituents of syenogranites, K-feldspars and quartz are the dominant minerals, since they reach up to 85 vol.%. K-feldspars include flamy (Figure 2d) and patchy orthoclase perthite as well as microcline minerals. Microcline shows perfect cross-hatching. Both orthoclase perthite and microcline are kaolinitized and seritized. Poikilitically, they are engulfing plagioclase crystals (Figure 2e). Quartz occurs as fine-to-medium-grained with clear surface. Plagioclase is of albite which is rare and commonly presents as tabular crystals corroded by orthoclase perthite. Biotite is the main mafic mineral that reveals variable alteration along its cleavage planes.
Albitized granite is fine-to-medium-grained and composed mainly of quartz and albite as the dominant minerals (up to 60 vol%). K-feldspar occurs with amounts reaching up to 25 vol.%, commonly anhedral crystal filling interstitial space between albite crystals. It is noticeable that all minerals reveal high relief. Albite occurs as subhedral and tabular crystals, sometimes fractured and saussuritized (Figure 2f). These rocks are characterized by abundant interstitial fluorite crystals as accessory minerals. The main mafic mineral is biotite that is slightly altered to chlorite.

5. Results and Discussion

5.1. Geochemical Characteristics

The geochemistry of Hormit Waggat intrusion was previously examined by many authors [10]. In the present work, we analyzed a few representative samples of Homrit Waggat granite rocks. Bulk rock [(major (%) and trace elements (ppm)] geochemical data and their normative values of multi magmatic Homrit Waggat rocks are given in Table 1.
The examined Homrit Waggat rocks exhibited a wide gap in their composition, certainly in SiO2 (65.58% in granodiorite; 76.8% in syenogranites); Al2O3 (13.34% in syenogranites; 17.02% in granodiorite); K2O/Na2O ratio, which increased from albitized granites (0.47%) to syenogranites (2.22%); CaO and Fe2O3t (0.29%, 0.37% in alkali-feldspar granites; 4.17%, 4.71% in granodiorite, respectively). Older granitic rocks (tonalite and granodiorite) have the lowest content of K2O/Na2O in comparison with younger granitic rocks (syenogranites and alkali-feldspar granites), with the exception of albitized granites due to the enrichment of albite. Tonalite and granodiorite comprise the highest concentrations in Al2O3, TiO2, Fe2O3t, CaO, Sc, Sr, Ba, V, Ni, Cu, and Ab + An but are depleted in TiO2, Na2O + K2O, Rb, and Nb relative to those of syenogranites and alkali-feldspar granites. Among the examined rocks, albitized granites contain the highest concentrations of Na2O (4.1%) and Ga (23.6 ppm) as well as Ab + An (41.98%) normative values as a result of albite enrichment.

5.2. Classification and Tectonic Setting

Variable classification diagrams are used to discriminate the examined rocks. In terms of total alkalis versus silica (TAS) diagram [18], all of the studied samples lie within the granites field, whereas tonalite and granodiorite fall within the field of granodiorite (Figure 3a). With further constraints, alkali-feldspar and syenogranite samples plot in the same field; albitized granites lie within the monzogranites field; and tonalite-granodiorite falls within the field of granodiorite (Figure 3b), using their calculated normative values [19].
It is noticeable that the studied Homrit Waggat rocks have high-K calc-alkaline affinity, whereas tonalite-granodiorite and albitized granites have medium-K calc-alkaline affinity [20] (Figure 3c). The rocks studied have alumina saturation indices (A/CNK = Al2O3/CaO + Na2O + K2O) greater than 1.1 (1.71–2.27), suggesting their peraluminous character [22]. In addition, they possess agpaitic indices (AI) lower than 0.87, indicating calc-alkaline characteristic. Among the Homrit Waggat rocks, tonalite-granodiorite rocks have low K2O/MgO content, reflecting I- and S-type affinity (Figure 3d), while other rock samples occupy A-type field [21].
It is noticeable from multi trace elements that are normalized to primitive mantle [23] that tonalite-granodiorite patterns reveal enrichment of low-field-strength elements (LFSEs) relative to high-field-strength-elements (HFSEs), with positive Ba, Pb, and Sr anomalies as well as negative Nb anomaly, reflecting subduction affinity (Figure 4a). On the contrary, other granitic types exhibit strong positive Rb anomaly without negative Nb anomaly. In addition, they reveal strong Ba, Sr, and Ti negative anomalies (Figure 4b), suggesting fractional crystallization of feldspars and titanite minerals.
Egyptian granitic rocks have different tectonic setting due to the difference in their mineralogical as well as geochemical composition. The studied tonalite-granodiorite rocks have geochemical characteristics of subduction-related regime. Therefore, they locate in volcanic arc granites (Figure 4c) in the binary diagram [24]. Controversially, Homrit Waggat younger granites (alkali-feldspar, syenogranites, and albitized granites) fall in the post-collisional and within plate granites. The same results have been obtained by using a ternary diagram [10,26], where the examined rocks lie rather than in the field of older calc-alkaline (I, metagabbro and diorite). The examined tonalite-granodiorite locate in the early phase of younger granites (II, granodiorite-tonalite-tonalite associations), whereas alkali-feldspar and syenogranites lie in the III (Figure 4d) field of late- to post-collisional setting (later phase of calc-alkaline granites). Albitized granites locate near the late- to post-collisional setting, and their origin may be related to albitic metasomatism of different granitic rocks [10].

5.3. Radiometric and Environmental Hazard Indices

The mean values of 238U, 232Th, 226Ra, and 240K activity concentrations (Bq/kg) are given in Table 2. It is noticeable that the mean values of 238U, 232Th, 226Ra, and 240K for alkali-feldspar (49.6, 44.44, 44.4, and 936 Bq/kg, respectively) are higher than the world safety limits of [27]. In addition, 238U concentration in albitized granites, granodiorite, and tonalite is under detection limits.
The U, Th, and K concentrations of El-Missikat area have averages of 257.2 Bq kg−1, 111 Bq kg−1, and 832.2 Bq kg−1 for monzogranite. For syenogranite, the U, Th, and K concentrations average 176.5, 92.25, and 899.2 Bq kg−1, respectively [15].
On the other hand, the granitic rocks of Um Taghir area have an average activity (range) of 238U series, 232Th series, and 40K of 15.7 (8.7–25.7), 13.2 (4.7–11.7), and 703.8 (195.1–1371.8) Bq/kg, respectively. The average concentration values of 238U and 232Th are lower than those of the world’s average and the average activities in the present study [28].
Some radiological hazards were applied for the examined samples in order to deduce their impact on human organs. They include annual effective dose (AED), gamma radiation index (Iγ), internal (Hin) and external (Hex) indices, absorbed gamma dose rate (D), and radium equivalent activity (Raeq) (Table 2).
Radium equivalent activity (Raeq) refers to the external dose from exposure to gamma rays and the internal dose from exposure to alpha particles. This index is directly related to the external and internal gamma dose from radon and its progenies [29]. Raeq is a proper index that uses activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in the following equation [2,30,31];
Raeq (Bq kg−1) = 226Ra + 1.43 232Th + 0.077 40K
The calculated average values of the radium equivalent index for the studied samples collected from Homrit Waggat area were recorded as 180, 154, 107.67, 90.13, and 42.66 Bq kg−1 for alkali-feldspar granites, syenogranites, albitized granites, granodiorite, and tonalite, respectively. The obtained results for all studied samples observed are less than the maximum value of 370 Bq kg−1 for radium equivalent index recommended value [15].
Radium equivalent content in El Sela area has an average of 734.3 Bq/Kg, which was significantly higher than the maximum permitted value in the world’s average and the average activities in the present study [32]. The average range of radium equivalent of the granitic rocks was 319.8 Bq kg−1, and the average (range) of radium equivalent for red and black jasperoid veins was found to be 1823.6 Bq kg−1. The estimated average value of red and black jasperoid veins of radium equivalent in El-Missikat area is higher than that of the recommended maximum value [15].

5.4. Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk (ELCR)

Excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR) was calculated using the following equation and presented in Table 2.
ELCR = AEDE * DL (70y) * Rf (0.5 SV−1)
where AEDE, DL, and Rf are the annual effective dose equivalent, duration of life (70 y), and risk factor (SV−1), fatal cancer risk per Sievert. For stochastic effects, ICRP 60 uses values of 0.05 for the public [33].
The calculated value of ELCR ranges from 0.00001 to 0.00004 in the investigated rocks. This value of ELCR was less than the world average [27].
The granitic rocks of El-Missikat area have excess lifetime cancer risk with average reach of about 633.0, while red and black jasperoid veins have an average of up to 3592, such that the granitic rocks of El-Missikat area are exceeding the world permissible safe criteria and are considered a risk source for human environment [15].
Likewise, absorbed gamma dose rate is defined as the energy transported by ionizing radiation to the mass unit of matter. It can be estimated from the radionuclide distribution in the air at 1 m above sea level as a result of gamma radiations [2,27,34,35] using 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K activity concentrations as in below:
D (nGy h−1) = 0.462 226Ra + 0.604 232Th + 0.0417 40K
The calculated average values of absorbed gamma dose rate are 86.38, 75.93, 53.49, 43.6, and 20.84 nGy h−1 for the examined alkali-feldspar granites, syenogranites, albitized granites, granodiorite, and tonalite, respectively. It was noticed that the alkali-feldspar granite and syenogranite absorbed dose is higher than the recommended value (57 nGy h−1) [34], whereas albitized granites, granodiorite, and tonalite are low.
In addition, the internal radiation index (Hin) (Figure 5a) can be determined in order to deduce the radon impact on respiratory organs. The Hin can be calculated using the following equation:
Hin = 226Ra/185 + 232Th/259 + 40K/4810 < 1
Values calculated of the Hin vary from 0.15 (tonalite) to 0.61 (alkali-feldspar granites), which are lower than the acceptable level [2,27,34,35].
Moreover, external hazard index (Hex) (Figure 5b) is used in order to assess the radiation dose as below [2,27,34,35].
Hex = 226Ra/370 + 232Th/259 + 40K/4810 ≤ 1
In terms of Hex, the calculated values vary from 0.12 (tonalite) to 0.49 (alkali-feldspar granites), which are lower than the acceptable level [16,36].
In addition, γ-radiation hazard (Iγ) is used to evaluate the radiation hazard accompanied with natural radionuclides in the examined samples. Gamma radiation is defined as in the following equation [2,27]:
Iγ = 226Ra/300 + 232Th/200 + 40K/4000
It is noticed that the Iγ ranges from 0.14 (tonalite) to 0.6 (alkali-feldspar granites), which falls within the acceptable levels [16,27].
Annual effective dose (AED) can be estimated using the absorbed dose values with the conversion factor of 0.7 Sv/Gy and the outdoor occupancy factor of 0.2 [2,16].
AED (mSv/y) = D(nGy/h) × 8760 (h) × 0.2 × 0.7 (Sv/Gy) × 10−6
AED obtained values ranging from 0.03 (tonalite) to 0.11 (alkali-feldspar granites), which falls within the acceptable levels [2,16,36].
From the previous parameters, the obtained values of the examined rocks indicate that these rocks are safe to be used as ornamental stones or in other applications such as the ceramic industry.

6. Conclusions

Homrit Waggat granitic rocks represent a post-collisional intrusion of ring-like shape which consists of two main phases of magmatic activity. The early phase includes tonalite-granodiorite suite of calc-alkaline nature and subduction-related setting. Controversially, the latter phase includes alkali-feldspar granite, syenogranite, and albitized granite with high-K calc alkaline and related to post-orogenic granites. They exhibit strong positive Rb anomaly without negative Nb anomaly and strong Ba, Sr, and Ti negative anomalies. Variable hazard indices such as radium equivalent activity (Raeq), annual absorbed gamma dose rate (D), effective dose (AED), gamma radiation index (Iγ), and internal (Hin) and external (Hex) indices were applied for Homrit Waggat rock units. The result of these indices falls within the acceptable standard values of worldwide limits. Thus, harmful radiation effects as a result of the natural radioactivity of investigated rocks do not pose a danger to the public in the field of construction and adornment or in the extent of their impact on those who use them in their homes or for other purposes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.S.R.L.; software, E.S.R.L. and N.A.K.; validation, E.S.R.L., M.K.A. and N.A.K.; formal analysis, H.A.A., H.M.H.Z., A.E., W.A., N.A.K. and M.K.A.; investigation, E.S.R.L. and N.A.K.; data curation, E.S.R.L., N.A.K. and M.K.A.; writing—original draft preparation, E.S.R.L. and N.A.K.; writing—review and editing, E.S.R.L., N.A.K., M.K.A., H.A.A., A.E. and H.M.H.Z.; funding acquisition, A.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The researcher (Hamdy A. Awad) is funded by a scholarship under the Joint Executive Program between Egypt and Russian Federation. The work of the author A.E. and the APC were funded by the “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati, Romania and grant no. RF 3621/2021.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bonin, B. A-Type Granites and Related Rocks: Evolution of a Concept, Problems and Prospects. Lithos 2007, 97, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lasheen, E.S.R.; Rashwan, M.A.; Osman, H.; Alamri, S.; Khandaker, M.U.; Hanfi, M.Y. Radiological Hazard Evaluation of Some Egyptian Magmatic Rocks Used as Ornamental Stone: Petrography and Natural Radioactivity. Materials 2021, 14, 7290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lasheen, E.S.R.; Saleh, G.M.; Khaleal, F.M.; Alwetaishi, M. Petrogenesis of Neoproterozoic Ultramafic Rocks, Wadi Ibib–Wadi Shani, South Eastern Desert, Egypt: Constraints from Whole Rock and Mineral Chemistry. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kamar, M.S.; Salem, I.A.; El-Aassy, I.E.; El-Sayed, A.A.; Awad, H.A.; Tekin, H.O.; Alzahrai, A.M.; Lasheen, E.S.R. Petrology and Geochemistry of Multiphase Post-Granitic Dikes: A Case Study from the Gabal Serbal Area, Southwestern Sinai, Egypt. Open Chem. 2022, 20, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Khaleal, F.M.; Saleh, G.M.; Lasheen, E.S.R.; Alzahrani, A.M.; Kamh, S.Z. Exploration and Petrogenesis of Corundum-Bearing Pegmatites: A Case Study in Migif-Hafafit Area, Egypt. Front. Earth Sci. 2022, 10, 869828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hamdy, M.M.; Lasheen, E.S.R.; Abdelwahab, W. Gold-Bearing Listwaenites in Ophiolitic Ultramafics from the Eastern Desert of Egypt: Subduction Zone-Related Alteration of Neoproterozoic Mantle? J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2022, 193, 104574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Stern, R.J.; Hedge, C.E. Geochronologic and Isotopic Constraints on Late Precambrian Crustal Evolution in the Eastern Desert of Egypt. Am. J. Sci. 1985, 285, 97–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Farahat, E.S.; Mohamed, H.A.; Ahmed, A.F.; El Mahallawi, M.M. Origin of I- and A-Type Granitoids from the Eastern Desert of Egypt: Implications for Crustal Growth in the Northern Arabian–Nubian Shield. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2007, 49, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alzahrani, A.M.; Lasheen, E.S.R.; Rashwan, M.A. Relationship of Mineralogical Composition to Thermal Expansion, Spectral Reflectance, and Physico-Mechanical Aspects of Commercial Ornamental Granitic Rocks. Materials 2022, 15, 2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Azer, M.K.; Abdelfadil, K.M.; Asimow, P.D.; Khalil, A.E. Tracking the Transition from Subduction-related to Post-collisional Magmatism in the North Arabian–Nubian Shield: A Case Study from the Homrit Waggat Area of the Eastern Desert of Egypt. Geol. J. 2020, 55, 4426–4452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abuamarah, B.A.; Azer, M.K.; Seddik, A.M.A.; Asimow, P.D.; Guzman, P.; Fultz, B.T.; Wilner, M.J.; Dalleska, N.; Darwish, M.H. Magmatic and Post-Magmatic Evolution of Post-Collisional Rare-Metal Bearing Granite: The Neoproterozoic Homrit Akarem Granitic Intrusion, South Eastern Desert of Egypt, Arabian-Nubian Shield. Geochemistry 2022, 82, 125840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Moussa, H.E.; Asimow, P.D.; Azer, M.K.; Abou El Maaty, M.A.; Akarish, A.I.M.; Yanni, N.N.; Mubarak, H.S.; Wilner, M.J.; Elsagheer, M.A. Magmatic and Hydrothermal Evolution of Highly-Fractionated Rare-Metal Granites at Gabal Nuweibi, Eastern Desert, Egypt. Lithos 2021, 400–401, 106405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Seddik, A.M.A.; Darwish, M.H.; Azer, M.K.; Asimow, P.D. Assessment of Magmatic versus Post-Magmatic Processes in the Mueilha Rare-Metal Granite, Eastern Desert of Egypt, Arabian-Nubian Shield. Lithos 2020, 366–367, 105542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sami, M.; Mahdy, N.M.; Ntaflos, T.; Fathy, D. Composition and Origin of Ti–Nb–Ta–Zr Bearing Minerals in the Abu Diab Highly Evolved Granite from the Central Eastern Desert of Egypt. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2020, 165, 103808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zakaly, H.M.H.; Nastavkin, A.V.; El-Taher, A. Radiological Implication of the Granitoid Rocks and Their Associated Jasperoid Veins, El-Missikat Area, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2020, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Awad, H.A.; Zakaly, H.M.H.; Nastavkin, A.V.; El Tohamy, A.M.; El-Taher, A. Radioactive Mineralizations on Granitic Rocks and Silica Veins on Shear Zone of El-Missikat Area, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2021, 168, 109493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Saleh, G.M.; Khaleal, F.M.; Lasheen, E.S.R. Geochemistry and Paleoweathering of Metasediments and Pyrite-Bearing Quartzite during the Neoproterozoic Era, Wadi Ibib-Wadi Suwawrib, South Eastern Desert, Egypt. Arab. J. Geosci. 2022, 15, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Middlemost, E.A.K. Naming Materials in the Magma/Igneous Rock System. Earth-Sci. Rev. 1994, 37, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Streckeisen, A. To Each Plutonic Rock Its Proper Name. Earth-Sci. Rev. 1976, 12, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rickwood, P.C. Boundary Lines within Petrologic Diagrams Which Use Oxides of Major and Minor Elements. Lithos 1989, 22, 247–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Whalen, J.B.; Currie, K.L.; Chappell, B.W. A-Type Granites: Geochemical Characteristics, Discrimination and Petrogenesis. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1987, 95, 407–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shand, S.J. Eruptive Rocks, 4th ed.; John Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1951. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sun, S.-S.; McDonough, W.F. Chemical and Isotopic Systematics of Oceanic Basalts: Implications for Mantle Composition and Processes. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 1989, 42, 313–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pearce, J.A.; Harris, N.B.W.; Tindle, A.G. Trace Element Discrimination Diagrams for the Tectonic Interpretation of Granitic Rocks. J. Petrol. 1984, 25, 956–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Pearce, J.A. Sources and Settings of Granitic Rocks. Episodes 1996, 19, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Hassan, M.A.; Hashad, A.H. Precambrian of Egypt. In The Geology of Egypt; Said, R., Ed.; Balkema: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1990; pp. 201–245. [Google Scholar]
  27. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation: UNSCEAR 2008 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes; UNSCEAR, Ed.; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2010; ISBN 978-92-1-142274-0. [Google Scholar]
  28. Awad, H.A.M.; Zakaly, H.M.H.; Nastavkin, A.V.; El-Taher, A. Radioactive Content and Radiological Implication in Granitic Rocks by Geochemical Data and Radiophysical Factors, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2020, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ashraf, M.; Anu Radha, C.; Ahmad, S.; Masood, S.; Ahmad Dar, R.; Ramasubramanian, V. Evaluation of Excess Life Time Cancer Risk Due to Natural Radioactivity of the Lignite Samples of the Nichahoma, Lignite Belt, North Kashmir, India. Radiochim. Acta 2016, 104, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ravisankar, R.; Chandramohan, J.; Chandrasekaran, A.; Prince Prakash Jebakumar, J.; Vijayalakshmi, I.; Vijayagopal, P.; Venkatraman, B. Assessments of Radioactivity Concentration of Natural Radionuclides and Radiological Hazard Indices in Sediment Samples from the East Coast of Tamilnadu, India with Statistical Approach. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2015, 97, 419–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Calin, M.R.; Radulescu, I.; Chiper, D.; Barna, C.; Cimpeanu, C. Chemical Characterization and Radiation Exposure from the Natural Radioactivity in Romanian Building Materials. Radiochim. Acta 2018, 106, 413–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ghoneim, M.M.; Abdel Gawad, A.E.; Awad, H.A.; Zakaly, H.M.H.; Mira, H.I.; El-Taher, A. Distribution Patterns of Natural Radioactivity and Rare Earth Elements in Intrusive Rocks (El Sela Area, Eastern Desert, Egypt). Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2021, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zakaly, H.M.; Uosif, M.A.; Madkour, H.; Tammam, M.; Issa, S.; Elsaman, R.; El-Taher, A. Assessment of Natural Radionuclides and Heavy Metal Concentrations in Marine Sediments in View of Tourism Activities in Hurghada City, Northern Red Sea, Egypt. J. Phys. Sci. 2019, 30, 21–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation: UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes; UNSCEAR, Ed.; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2000; ISBN 978-92-1-142238-2. [Google Scholar]
  35. Tufail, M. Radium Equivalent Activity in the Light of UNSCEAR Report. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012, 184, 5663–5667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. ICRP. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann. ICRP 1991, 21, 1–201. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Location map of Homrit Waggat area, Central Eastern Desert of Egypt; (b) geologic map of Homrit Waggat area modified after [10].
Figure 1. (a) Location map of Homrit Waggat area, Central Eastern Desert of Egypt; (b) geologic map of Homrit Waggat area modified after [10].
Materials 15 04069 g001
Figure 2. Photomicrographs showing: (a) well-developed zonation of plagioclase (Pl) in granodiorite; (b) aggregates of wedge-like shape of titanite (Tnt) crystals in granodiorite; (c) biotite (bt) is partially altered to chlorite in syenogranites; (d) flamy perthite (Pr) associated with plagioclase (Pl) crystal in alkali-feldspar granites; (e) turbid perthite engulfing plagioclase crystal in alkali-feldspar granites; and (f) fractured albitic plagioclase associated with biotite in albitized granites.
Figure 2. Photomicrographs showing: (a) well-developed zonation of plagioclase (Pl) in granodiorite; (b) aggregates of wedge-like shape of titanite (Tnt) crystals in granodiorite; (c) biotite (bt) is partially altered to chlorite in syenogranites; (d) flamy perthite (Pr) associated with plagioclase (Pl) crystal in alkali-feldspar granites; (e) turbid perthite engulfing plagioclase crystal in alkali-feldspar granites; and (f) fractured albitic plagioclase associated with biotite in albitized granites.
Materials 15 04069 g002
Figure 3. Classification and magma-type diagrams of Homrit Waggat rocks using: (a) SiO2 vs. Na2O + K2O diagram [18]; (b) Ab-Or-An normative diagram [19]; (c) SiO2 vs. K2O diagram [20]; and (d) 10,000*Ga/Al vs. K2O/MgO diagram [21].
Figure 3. Classification and magma-type diagrams of Homrit Waggat rocks using: (a) SiO2 vs. Na2O + K2O diagram [18]; (b) Ab-Or-An normative diagram [19]; (c) SiO2 vs. K2O diagram [20]; and (d) 10,000*Ga/Al vs. K2O/MgO diagram [21].
Materials 15 04069 g003
Figure 4. Multi trace elements pattern normalized to primitive mantle [23] for (a) tonalite-granodiorite and (b) alkali-feldspar granites, syenogranites, and albitized granites. Tectonic discrimination diagrams (c) Y + Nb versus Rb binary diagram [24], where post-collisional field is adapted from [25]; and (d) NKC diagram (Na2O-K2O-CaO) of the Egyptian granitoids [26], III = late (subphase) orogenic calc-alkaline phase, II = early subphase of younger granites, I = calc-alkaline diorite and metagabbro. Rock symbols as in Figure 3.
Figure 4. Multi trace elements pattern normalized to primitive mantle [23] for (a) tonalite-granodiorite and (b) alkali-feldspar granites, syenogranites, and albitized granites. Tectonic discrimination diagrams (c) Y + Nb versus Rb binary diagram [24], where post-collisional field is adapted from [25]; and (d) NKC diagram (Na2O-K2O-CaO) of the Egyptian granitoids [26], III = late (subphase) orogenic calc-alkaline phase, II = early subphase of younger granites, I = calc-alkaline diorite and metagabbro. Rock symbols as in Figure 3.
Materials 15 04069 g004
Figure 5. Hazard indices values. (a) Internal hazard index value (Hin) and (b) external hazard index value (Hex).
Figure 5. Hazard indices values. (a) Internal hazard index value (Hin) and (b) external hazard index value (Hex).
Materials 15 04069 g005
Table 1. Whole-rock analyses (major (%) and trace elements (ppm)) of the examined rocks and their normative values.
Table 1. Whole-rock analyses (major (%) and trace elements (ppm)) of the examined rocks and their normative values.
Rock UnitsSyenogranitesAlkali-
Feldspar Granites
Albitized GranitesGranodioriteTonalite
SiO276.80376.56574.51165.58571.507
Al2O313.34914.92316.13717.02415.471
TiO20.1130.0470.0120.7170.369
Fe2O31.7460.3730.5484.7193.448
MgO0.0270.1060.0281.5260.562
Na2O2.153.174.1092.5752.766
K2O4.7813.6791.9342.1021.385
CaO0.8440.2911.5114.1742.673
MnO0.0420.0660.0770.0590.123
P2O50.0230.0330.0440.420.94
LOI0.640.620.480.451.42
Total100.5299.8799.3999.35100.66
SCNDND2.47.35.7
VNDNDND27.415.1
CoNDNDNDNDND
NiNDNDND6.2ND
Cu3.53.2036.44.5
Zn48.151.109.756.543.9
Ga20.223.3023.619.914.8
Rb65.20153.30031.942.220
Sr13.4027.0076.9356.2102.4
Zr168.5040.7057.1212132.6
Y27.3015.5036.711.130.2
Nb11.526.40ND4.90.5
CdND2.00NDND3.10
Sn8.710.96.88.410.5
CsND6.7NDNDND
Ba1841.710.4135.2133.9
La9.5ND11.4116.6
Ce39.7ND3.516.49.1
Nd14.73.1ND5.26.2
Sm3.5ND6.3ND5.2
Hf5.95.83.65.17.3
Ta2.2NDND4.5ND
W2.40.72.115.513
Tl7.86.48.67.87.8
Pb8.17.213.85.12.2
Th9.67.82.48.9ND
UND2.3NDNDND
Qz44.243.440.0632.5449
Crn3.25.28549
Or28.321.7411128
Ab18.226.82352223.41
An4.01.2371812
Hy0.10.30.073.801
Hm20053
ND indicates that the measuring system does not give any concentrations of these elements.
Table 2. The measured activity concentrations for radionuclides and radiological hazard indices for the examined rocks.
Table 2. The measured activity concentrations for radionuclides and radiological hazard indices for the examined rocks.
Activity Concentration (Bq/Kg)Radiological Hazard Indices
Rock Units238 U232 Th226 Ra240 KRaeqAbsorbedHinHexEff. DoseELCR * 10−4
Alkali-feldspar granite 41.6036.4436.40927.87159.9677.520.530.430.540.100.00004
51.6046.4446.40937.87185.0388.600.630.500.620.110.00003
55.6050.4450.40941.87195.0593.030.660.530.660.110.00004
Av49.6044.4444.40935.87180.0186.380.610.490.600.110.00004
Syenogranites 54.0020.2825.301034.29133.9467.070.430.360.440.080.00004
64.0030.2835.301044.29159.0178.140.520.430.530.100.00003
68.0034.2839.301048.29169.0482.580.560.460.560.100.00003
Av62.0028.2833.301042.29154.0075.930.510.420.510.090.00003
Albitized granites 0.002.0336.40724.4295.0848.250.360.260.310.060.00004
0.005.0246.40734.42110.1355.090.420.300.360.070.00002
0.005.0750.40738.42114.5157.140.450.310.380.070.00002
Av0.004.0444.40732.42106.5753.490.410.290.350.070.00002
Granodiorite 0.0012.2014.20499.0670.0734.740.230.190.230.040.00002
0.0022.2024.20509.0695.1445.820.320.260.320.060.00002
0.0026.2028.20513.06105.1750.250.360.280.350.060.00001
Av0.0020.2022.20507.0690.1343.600.300.240.300.050.00002
Tonalite 0.000.083.10251.7922.6011.980.070.060.070.010.00002
0.0010.0813.10261.7947.6723.060.160.130.160.030.00001
0.0014.0817.10265.7957.7027.490.200.160.190.030.00001
Av0.008.0811.10259.7942.6620.840.150.120.140.030.00001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lasheen, E.S.R.; Azer, M.K.; Ene, A.; Abdelwahab, W.; Zakaly, H.M.H.; Awad, H.A.; Kawady, N.A. Radiological Hazards and Natural Radionuclide Distribution in Granitic Rocks of Homrit Waggat Area, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt. Materials 2022, 15, 4069. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124069

AMA Style

Lasheen ESR, Azer MK, Ene A, Abdelwahab W, Zakaly HMH, Awad HA, Kawady NA. Radiological Hazards and Natural Radionuclide Distribution in Granitic Rocks of Homrit Waggat Area, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt. Materials. 2022; 15(12):4069. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124069

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lasheen, El Saeed R., Mokhles K. Azer, Antoaneta Ene, Wael Abdelwahab, Hesham M. H. Zakaly, Hamdy A. Awad, and Nilly A. Kawady. 2022. "Radiological Hazards and Natural Radionuclide Distribution in Granitic Rocks of Homrit Waggat Area, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt" Materials 15, no. 12: 4069. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124069

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop