Next Article in Journal
Pathways of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor (HIF) in the Orchestration of Uterine Fibroids Development
Previous Article in Journal
Structure-Based Multi-Targeted Molecular Docking and Dynamic Simulation of Soybean-Derived Isoflavone Genistin as a Potential Breast Cancer Signaling Proteins Inhibitor
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 13
Issue 8
10.3390/life13081741
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Protective Effect of Vitamin D on Dementia Risk in Hemodialysis Patients

by
Chih-Lang Lin
1,2,3,†,
Wan-Ming Chen
4,5,†,
An-Tzu Jao
6,
Ben-Chang Shia
4,5 and
Szu-Yuan Wu
4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,*
1
Liver Research Unit, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung 204, Taiwan
2
College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 833, Taiwan
3
Community Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung Branch, Keelung 204, Taiwan
4
Graduate Institute of Business Administration, College of Management, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taipei 242, Taiwan
5
Artificial Intelligence Development Center, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taipei 242, Taiwan
6
Big Data Center, Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital, Yilan 265, Taiwan
7
Department of Food Nutrition and Health Biotechnology, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung 413, Taiwan
8
Division of Radiation Oncology, Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital, Yilan 265, Taiwan
9
Department of Healthcare Administration, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung 413, Taiwan
10
Cancer Center, Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital, Yilan 265, Taiwan
11
Centers for Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Taipei Municipal Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 116, Taiwan
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Life 2023, 13(8), 1741; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13081741
Submission received: 18 July 2023 / Revised: 3 August 2023 / Accepted: 11 August 2023 / Published: 13 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Topic Translational Advances in Neurodegenerative Dementias)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

This study investigated the effect of vitamin D supplementation on the risk of dementia in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis, which is a novel contribution to the literature. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the relationship between vitamin D supplementation and the risk of dementia in this patient population. The use of a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort design adds robustness and reliability to the study findings. The results demonstrated that vitamin D supplementation at doses of ≥70 μg/week significantly reduced the risk of dementia in a dose-dependent manner, regardless of age. These findings add new and important information to the existing literature on the relationship between vitamin D and cognitive health in ESRD patients on hemodialysis, and suggest that vitamin D supplementation may be an effective preventive strategy for cognitive impairment in this vulnerable patient population.

Abstract

Background: Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing hemodialysis are at an elevated risk of developing dementia, potentially linked to the high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in this population, which may contribute to cognitive impairment. Nevertheless, the impact of vitamin D supplementation on the risk of dementia in hemodialysis patients remains uncertain, necessitating further investigation to elucidate the potential benefits of vitamin D intervention in this vulnerable group. Methods: In this propensity-score-matched comparative cohort study, we sought to assess the impact of vitamin D supplementation on the occurrence of dementia in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing hemodialysis. A total of 1424 patients were included and matched 1:1 using propensity scores. The study population was divided into two groups: those receiving vitamin D supplementation at a dose of ≥70 μg/week and those without any supplementation. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of dementia. We calculated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) to examine the association between vitamin D supplementation and the risk of dementia while controlling for relevant covariates. Results: The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) comparing vitamin D supplementation to no supplementation was 0.44 (95% CI 0.29–0.69; p < 0.0001), demonstrating a significant decrease in the risk of dementia associated with vitamin D supplementation. The aHRs for vitamin D supplementation at different dose ranges (70–105, 106–350, 351–1000, and >1000 μg/week) were 0.51, 0.49, 0.43, and 0.41, respectively (p for trend < 0.0001). These findings suggest a potential dose-dependent relationship between vitamin D supplementation and the reduction of dementia risk. Conclusions: In our study, we found that vitamin D supplementation at doses of ≥70 μg/week significantly reduced the risk of dementia in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing hemodialysis. Furthermore, our results indicated a dose-dependent effect, with higher doses of supplementation correlating with a greater reduction in dementia risk. These findings underscore the potential of vitamin D supplementation as a preventive approach for cognitive impairment in this high-risk population.

1. Introduction

In Taiwan, the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is estimated to be around 11.9%, with the disease affecting more than 2·5 million people [1]. Taiwan boasts the highest incidence and prevalence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) globally, with over 90% of dialysis in Taiwan being hemodialysis [1,2,3,4]. Renal dysfunction in older adults is linked to a heightened risk of cognitive decline and dementia, possibly due to shared risk factors for vascular diseases, such as coronary heart disease, diabetes, and hypertension [5,6]. Fukunishi et al. [7] revealed that older adults on hemodialysis had a 7.4-fold higher annual incidence of dementia compared to older adults in the general population. These findings underscore the elevated risk of dementia among individuals with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis in Taiwan [3,4], and interventions, such as nutritional support, exercise, and medical management, may be necessary for the prevention, early detection, and attenuation of dementia [5,6,7,8].
Dementia is a devastating neurological condition that results in cognitive decline and impairments in daily functioning [9]. The global cost of caring for individuals with dementia is staggering, with estimates suggesting that in 2022 alone, USD 321 billion will be spent on healthcare, long-term care, and hospice services for those with the disease [10]. As the population ages and the number of individuals with dementia continues to rise, by 2060, projections suggest that the population of individuals affected by the condition is expected to reach 13.8 million, emphasizing the growing magnitude of the issue [10]. In order to tackle this urgent public health concern, it is imperative to identify modifiable risk factors for dementia and implement targeted interventions to mitigate the incidence and economic impact of the disease.
The association between vitamin D supplementation and the risk of dementia remains uncertain, necessitating further investigation and clarification. Prior research has provided evidence indicating an association between vitamin D deficiency and an elevated risk of dementia [11,12,13,14,15,16]. In 2022, a study found that vitamin D supplementation may exacerbate dementia progression, but this study did not consider factors such as vitamin D dosage, the severity of underlying diseases, or comorbidities associated with dementia, or adjust for competing mortality [17]. In order to better understand this relationship, we performed a comparative propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to investigate the impact of vitamin D on the risk of dementia in patients with ESRD who are undergoing hemodialysis [7,18]. Prior studies have firmly established the association between vitamin D deficiency and an elevated risk of developing dementia [7,18]. Patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis face a significantly higher risk of developing dementia, potentially linked to the high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in this population, which may contribute to cognitive impairment [19,20,21]. While prior research has shown an association between vitamin D deficiency and an elevated risk of dementia [11,12,13,14,15,16], the relationship between vitamin D supplementation and dementia risk remains uncertain. Some studies have suggested that vitamin D supplementation may exacerbate dementia progression [17], but these studies lacked consideration of dosage and comorbidities associated with dementia. To address this uncertainty, our study utilized a comparative propensity-score matching analysis to investigate the impact of vitamin D on dementia risk in ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis, aiming to provide more insights into this relationship.

2. Patients and Methods

2.1. Study Cohort

We retrieved data from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan, encompassing the period from January 2004 to December 2020. The NHIRD contains comprehensive claims data from beneficiaries enrolled in the National Health Insurance program [22]. The NHIRD ensures the privacy and confidentiality of individuals by encrypting all data. Within this database, we accessed detailed outpatient and inpatient claims data, which encompassed patients’ identification numbers, birth dates, sex, diagnostic codes according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM), treatment details, medical costs, as well as dates of hospital admission, discharge, and death [22,23,24,25,26]. Our protocols were thoroughly reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Taipei Medical University (Approval No. 202212119).

2.2. Patient Selection

Patients aged 40 years or older who had undergone hemodialysis were included in this study. The index date was defined as the date of hemodialysis initiation. Exclusion criteria included a history of dementia prior to or within 1 year after the index date, as well as patients who died before 31 December 2020. Vitamin D supplementation was defined as the consumption of supplements containing vitamin D on most days, with a weekly dosage of ≥70 μg. Patients on hemodialysis who were prescribed ≥70 μg/week of vitamin D for more than 1 year constituted the treatment group, and those who were not prescribed vitamin D constituted the control group.
This study’s exclusion criteria were designed to ensure a specific and homogeneous study population. Firstly, patients with a history of dementia before or within 1 year after the index date were excluded to focus on incident cases of dementia rather than pre-existing conditions. This allowed for a clearer examination of the association between vitamin D supplementation and the risk of developing dementia. Secondly, patients who died before 31 December 2020 were excluded from this study. This exclusion aimed to avoid survival bias, as including patients who died during the study period could skew the results and lead to an inaccurate estimation of dementia risk. Additionally, individuals with any neurological disorders, such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, were excluded. This decision aimed to eliminate potential confounding factors that could influence this study’s outcomes and focus solely on the effect of vitamin D supplementation on dementia risk in hemodialysis patients. Furthermore, patients who discontinued hemodialysis treatment before 31 December 2020 were excluded from this study to minimize the impact of competing mortality. Discontinuation of hemodialysis could significantly affect the patient’s health status and lead to early mortality, introducing bias into the results. The defined daily dose (DDD) of vitamin D was converted into micrograms per week for ease of calculation and to standardize the measurement. Patients taking less than 70 μg/week of vitamin D were excluded from this study to ensure that the analysis focused on patients with consistent and significant vitamin D supplementation, rather than those with occasional or minimal intake.
The primary endpoint of this study was the occurrence of all-cause dementia. Dementia was defined based on specific ICD-9 cm codes (290.0, 290.1, 290.2, 290.3, 290.4, 294.1, or 331.0) recorded by board-certified psychiatrists or neurologists in accordance with the diagnostic criteria outlined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-V). To ensure accurate identification of dementia cases, we required a minimum of three outpatient records or one hospital admission with a diagnostic code issued by a qualified psychiatrist or neurologist. It should be noted that our study employed a stricter definition of dementia compared to previous studies utilizing NHIRD data [27,28,29]. The NHIRD serves as a valuable population-level data source, offering real-world evidence that can inform clinical decision-making and healthcare policy development. Its comprehensive nature allows for the analysis of large patient cohorts, enabling robust evaluations of treatment outcomes, disease patterns, and healthcare utilization. The utilization of NHIRD data in our study provides a representative overview of the population, enhancing the generalizability and applicability of our findings to clinical practice and healthcare planning [30,31,32]. Continual efforts to validate diagnostic codes and refine methodological approaches have enhanced the reliability and validity of studies utilizing the NHIRD. The NHIRD has demonstrated high accuracy in diagnosing various diseases, making it a reliable resource for population-based research. These advancements in data quality and research methodologies have strengthened the credibility of NHIRD studies, providing valuable insights into disease epidemiology, treatment outcomes, and healthcare utilization at a population level [30,31,32].

2.3. PSM and Covariates

Patients prescribed vitamin D supplementation were identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to select patients not prescribed vitamin D supplementation from the remaining eligible database population. To account for potential confounders, a time-varying Cox proportional-hazards model was employed, taking into consideration the interval between the start of hemodialysis and a dementia diagnosis. A greedy method with a caliper size of 0.2 was used to match participants in a 1:1 ratio based on sex, age, income level, hospital type, and dementia-related comorbidities [33]. Comorbidities were determined based on primary ICD-9 cm codes from inpatient records, with patients requiring the corresponding code for ≥2 outpatient visits within 1 year to be considered as having the comorbidity. The analysis included comorbidities documented within 1 year before and after the index date. PSM is a widely used technique in clinical research to balance covariate distributions between treatment groups, while the standardized mean difference is commonly used to compare covariate distributions.

2.4. Dementia Hazard Ratios

We utilized time-varying Cox regression models to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in order to compare the risks of dementia in patients undergoing hemodialysis with and without vitamin D supplementation.

2.5. Dose-Dependent Vitamin D Supplementation and Dementia Risk

The analysis of vitamin D dosage was based on the defined daily dose (DDD), as defined by the World Health Organization. The DDD represents the average daily maintenance dose of a drug used for its primary indication in adults [34]. To facilitate calculations, the defined daily dose (DDD) was converted into micrograms per week. Patients with a DDD of zero were considered not to be taking vitamin D. Moreover, to estimate the dose-dependent effects in the Cox regression model, the patients receiving vitamin D supplementation were subdivided into four groups based on dosage: 70–105, 106–350, 351–1000, or >1000 μg/week.

2.6. Subgroup Analysis

We conducted a subgroup analysis using a time-varying multivariate Cox regression model to assess the association between dementia and age, while adjusting for the confounding factors mentioned earlier.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation, as appropriate. We employed a time-varying Cox regression analysis to assess the risk of dementia. To account for clustering within matched sets, a robust sandwich estimator was utilized. Furthermore, a time-varying multivariate Cox regression model was employed to estimate HRs with 95% CIs and identify potential independent predictors of dementia. All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). The significance level was set at p < 0.05, determined by a two-tailed Wald test. The cumulative incidence of dementia was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier estimator, and a stratified log-rank test was employed to compare the incidence of dementia, stratified according to matched sets.

3. Results

3.1. Study Cohort

PSM resulted in a final cohort of 1424 patients on hemodialysis, evenly distributed between the treatment and control groups (N = 712 each). The baseline characteristics of the two groups, including sex, age, income level, hospital type, and dementia-related comorbidities, were well-balanced after PSM, as shown in Table 1. The crude incidence rate of dementia differed significantly between the treatment and control groups (p < 0.0001; Table 1). The baseline characteristics of the two groups were well-balanced after PSM, and the incidence rate of dementia differed significantly between the treatment and control groups.

3.2. Predictors of Dementia in Patients on Hemodialysis

The time-varying multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed a significantly lower risk of dementia in the treatment group compared to the control group (Table 2). Following propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in sex, income level, hospital type, or dementia-related comorbidities between the two groups. The aHR for the treatment group, compared to the control group, was 0.44 (95% CI 0.29–0.69; p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that compared to the 40–50-year-old subgroup, the aHRs (95% CIs) for the 51–60-year-old, 61–70-year-old, and >70-year-old subgroups were 2.51 (1.59–7.76), 4.18 (3.85–9.40), and 6.76 (5.36–11.23), respectively (Table 2). Time-varying multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed a significantly lower risk of dementia in the treatment group compared to the control group. Subgroup analysis indicated that age had a significant influence on dementia risk, with older age groups showing higher aHRs.

3.3. Risk of Dementia by Vitamin D Dosage

We further observed a dose–response relationship between vitamin D dosage and the risk of dementia. Compared to the control group (0 μg/week), the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for vitamin D dosages of 70–105 μg/week, 106–350 μg/week, 351–1000 μg/week, and >1000 μg/week were 0.51, 0.49, 0.43, and 0.41, respectively (p < 0.0001) (Table 3). There was a dose–response relationship between vitamin D dosage and the risk of dementia. Higher vitamin D dosages were associated with lower risks of dementia.

3.4. Kaplan–Meier Curves Dementia

The cumulative risks of dementia for the control and treatment groups are depicted in Figure 1. Notably, the cumulative risk of dementia was significantly higher in the control group compared to the treatment group (p = 0.0060). Kaplan–Meier curves depicted significantly lower cumulative risks of dementia in the treatment group compared to the control group.

3.5. Subgroup Analysis

To further explore the influence of age on dementia risk, a subgroup analysis was conducted by dividing the sample into two groups: aged ≥65 or <65 years. The analysis utilized a time-varying Cox regression model, and the findings are displayed in a forest plot depicted in Figure 2. Notably, in comparison to the treatment group, the control group exhibited significantly adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for dementia risk, indicating a significantly elevated risk of dementia in the absence of vitamin D supplementation, regardless of age. Subgroup analysis by age groups (<65 and ≥65 years) demonstrated that the treatment group consistently exhibited lower dementia risks compared to the control group, irrespective of age.
In conclusion, our study provides evidence supporting the protective effects of vitamin D supplementation on dementia risk in hemodialysis patients. The results indicate a significant reduction in dementia risk with vitamin D supplementation, and the protective effect appears to be dose-dependent. Subgroup analysis further confirms the benefits of vitamin D supplementation across different age groups.

3.6. Discussion

CKD represents a significant risk factor for dementia, and patients undergoing hemodialysis face an even higher risk. This heightened risk is evidenced by the annual incidence of dementia among older adults on hemodialysis, which is 7.4 times greater than that among older adults not receiving hemodialysis [7,35,36]. The potential benefits of nutritional intervention or medication in mitigating the risk of dementia among these patients are of considerable interest; however, the impact of vitamin D supplementation on dementia risk in this population remains uncertain [17,37]. Existing studies have yielded conflicting findings regarding the potential impact of vitamin D supplementation on the risk of dementia. While some studies have not observed a significant reduction in dementia risk with vitamin D supplementation, further investigation is needed to provide a clearer understanding of its effects [17,37], while others, including a retrospective observational study in 2022, have shown that vitamin D supplementation may even accelerate dementia progression [17]. However, these studies did not consider factors such as dosage, the severity of underlying diseases, or comorbidities related to dementia, or control for competing mortality [17]. The results of a preclinical study suggest that double-transgenic mice with certain gene variations may have lower vitamin D levels, but this effect was not observed in mice without these variations [17]. Specifically, the study found that mice with amyloid precursor protein and presenilin 1 gene variations, which are associated with early-onset Alzheimer’s disease but not all-cause dementia, had lower vitamin D levels. However, this effect was not observed in mice without a chimeric mouse/human amyloid precursor protein or variant human presenilin 1. These findings suggest a potential genetic specificity in the association between vitamin D levels and early-onset Alzheimer’s disease [17]. The main difference between our study and previous studies concerning a similar issue lies in the use of PSM to create a well-controlled comparative analysis. While existing studies have yielded conflicting findings regarding the impact of vitamin D supplementation on dementia risk [17,37], our study employed a rigorous PSM approach to minimize potential bias and provide compelling evidence of a significant reduction in the risk of all-cause dementia among patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis receiving vitamin D supplementation. We observed a noteworthy adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.44 (0.29–0.69; p < 0.0001) for vitamin D supplementation, indicating a substantial protective effect. Notably, we identified a dose-dependent relationship, with higher doses of vitamin D associated with a progressively lower risk of dementia. Specifically, our findings revealed adjusted hazard ratios of 0.51, 0.49, 0.43, and 0.41 for vitamin D dosages of 70–105, 106–350, 351–1000, and >1000 μg/week, respectively (p < 0.0001). This study represents a significant advancement in the understanding of the impact of vitamin D supplementation on dementia risk in a high-risk population of patients with ESRD on hemodialysis.
Previous studies have consistently demonstrated an association between vitamin D deficiency and an increased risk of dementia in older adults [11]. Cross-sectional and case–control studies have shown that low vitamin D levels are associated with cognitive impairment, white matter abnormalities, and an elevated risk of all-cause dementia and Alzheimer’s disease [12,13,14]. Additionally, longitudinal studies have revealed an inverse relationship between vitamin D levels and cognitive decline over time [15]. However, the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation in reducing the risk of dementia remains uncertain, with some low-quality reports suggesting no benefit [17,37]. The lack of controlled intervention studies hinders the identification of compelling reasons to prescribe vitamin D supplementation for preventing cognitive decline or dementia. Consequently, well-controlled intervention studies are warranted to confirm the dose-dependent effect of vitamin D supplementation in reducing dementia risk among hemodialysis patients [7,18].
Vitamin D deficiency has been implicated in the pathogenesis of dementia through several mechanisms. Studies suggest that vitamin D may play a role in the clearance of amyloid plaques in the brain [38,39], thereby reducing the risk of Alzheimer’s disease [40]. Additionally, vitamin D deficiency has been associated with vascular dysfunction and an increased risk of ischemic stroke [41], which are known contributors to cognitive decline and dementia. Furthermore, vitamin D deficiency has been linked to brain atrophy [42], which can contribute to the development of dementia. These findings highlight the potential mechanisms by which vitamin D deficiency may increase the risk of dementia. To date, no clinical studies have specifically examined the association between vitamin D and dementia risk in high-risk populations, such as patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing hemodialysis. Our study is the first well-controlled clinical investigation to assess the dose-dependent effects of vitamin D supplementation on dementia risk in this patient population. While our findings demonstrate a significant reduction in dementia risk with vitamin D supplementation, the underlying mechanisms responsible for these effects remain unclear and warrant further investigation.
In our study, we have not explored studies concerning the use of other plant extracts in relation to dementia risk. The focus of our study was specifically on vitamin D supplementation in hemodialysis patients. However, it is worth noting that previous research has investigated the association between other plant extracts and dementia risk. Some studies have explored the potential cognitive benefits of various herbal supplements, such as Ginkgo biloba, Bacopa monnieri, and Curcuma longa (turmeric), in reducing the risk of cognitive decline and dementia [43,44]. These studies often utilized observational designs or randomized controlled trials to assess the effects of these plant extracts on cognitive function [43,44]. Due to the fact that the aforementioned plant extracts are not covered by Taiwan National Health Insurance, we were unable to retrieve data on this category of plant extracts in our dataset. However, to offer a comprehensive understanding of the topic, it would be beneficial to conduct further investigation into the literature on plant extracts and their potential impact on dementia risk in the near future.
In this study, we employed a rigorous 1:1 PSM approach to minimize potential bias. Furthermore, we performed subgroup analyses by sex, age, income level, hospital type, and dementia-related comorbidities, and adjusted for relevant covariates to thoroughly investigate the impact of vitamin D supplementation on dementia risk. Our findings based on real-world data support the notion that vitamin D supplementation is associated with a reduced risk of dementia. However, further validation through large-scale randomized controlled trials is warranted to confirm these results definitively.
This study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. Firstly, the study participants consisted only of individuals of Asian descent, and caution should be exercised when generalizing the results to other populations. Secondly, the diagnosis of dementia relied on specific ICD-9 cm codes provided by professional psychiatrists or neurologists, which suggests accuracy but does not eliminate the possibility of misdiagnosis. The National Health Insurance system in Taiwan conducts audits and verifications to ensure the reliability of diagnoses recorded in the NHIRD. Nevertheless, a large-scale randomized controlled trial with carefully selected patients on hemodialysis and vitamin D supplementation may be necessary to provide more definitive evidence, although such trials are challenging to conduct in this patient population due to the limitations of tangible interventions [45]. Thirdly, as an observational study, we could not determine the reasons behind the decision to prescribe vitamin D supplementation. Fourthly, one limitation of our study is the lack of data on serum vitamin D concentrations. In clinical practice, the dosage of vitamin D supplementation is typically determined by monitoring serum calcium, phosphorus, and parathyroid hormone levels. Physicians are obliged to track these blood indicators when prescribing vitamin D. The patients’ condition must demonstrate improvements in these parameters for the physician to continue the prescription. Non-adherence to these regulations could lead to audits by the Taiwan National health insurance bureau and severe penalties, including a hundredfold increase in drug costs and exclusion of insurance coverage for that specific medication. Therefore, we believe that patients’ serum vitamin D concentrations generally experience some degree of improvement to justify the continuation of the medication prescription. Fifthly, our study did not directly measure estrogen levels in the NHIRD, as laboratory data is unavailable in NHIRD. However, in the context of hemodialysis patients, the hemodialysis procedure involves the clearance of metabolites and hormones, including estrogen, from the bloodstream. Consequently, the estrogen levels in hemodialysis patients are typically lower compared to those of individuals with normal kidney function [46]. Additionally, the matching process has already addressed age, a critical factor related to estrogen levels, within the study cohort. Considering that the study population consists of individuals with lower estrogen levels and age has been appropriately matched, we expect that the association between vitamin D supplementation and dementia risk in hemodialysis patients remains unaffected by estrogen levels. Sixthly, regarding adverse events in patients receiving 1000 mcg/week of vitamin D [47], our study did not specifically mention any observed adverse effects. However, it is important to note that vitamin D toxicity can occur with excessive doses, leading to hypercalcemia and related health issues [48]. Fortunately, our study cohort consisted of hemodialysis patients who undergo frequent treatments (three times a week at the hospital), which can help regulate blood calcium levels and minimize the risk of vitamin D toxicity (as nephrologists closely monitor electrolyte balance during hemodialysis sessions). The patients are closely monitored by kidney specialists, which can further mitigate potential adverse effects (three times a week). Due to the frequent hemodialysis sessions and close monitoring by nephrologists, the study cohort is less likely to experience kidney damage, bone problems, digestive system disturbances, and muscle and nerve problems associated with vitamin D toxicity. Lastly, the NHIRD lacked information on dietary habits, educational background, family history, and laboratory parameters, which could potentially influence the risk of dementia. Despite these limitations, the present study benefits from its use of a nationwide population-based registry with comprehensive baseline data and the ability to perform lifelong follow-up through linkage with the national cause-of-death register in Taiwan. Given the strong and statistically significant effects observed in this study, it is unlikely that the aforementioned limitations have significantly impacted our results.

4. Conclusions

In our study, we observed a significant dose-dependent reduction in the risk of dementia among patients on hemodialysis who received vitamin D supplementation. This effect was consistent across different age groups, indicating the potential effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation as an intervention for reducing dementia risk in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis. However, further research is warranted to validate these findings and establish the optimal dosage and duration of vitamin D supplementation for preventing dementia in this specific population.

Author Contributions

Conception and Design: C.-L.L., W.-M.C., A.-T.J., B.-C.S. and S.-Y.W.; Collection and Assembly of Data: C.-L.L. and S.-Y.W.; Data Analysis and Interpretation: W.-M.C., W.-M.C. and B.-C.S.; Administrative Support: S.-Y.W.; Manuscript Writing: C.-L.L. and S.-Y.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, LotungPoh-Ai Hospital, supports Szu-Yuan Wu’s work (Funding Number: 11001, 11010, 11013 and 11103). This research is supported by the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Research Projects CLRPG2L0051.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study protocols were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tzu-Chi Medical Foundation (IRB109-015-B).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets supporting the study conclusions are included within this manuscript and its additional files.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to declare. The datasets supporting the study conclusions are included within the manuscript.

Abbreviations

HR: hazard ratio; aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; ICD-9-CM, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification; PSM, propensity-score matching; NHIRD, National Health Insurance Research Database; DDD, defined daily dose; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; PMP, per million population; SMD, standardized mean difference.

References

  1. Wen, C.P.; Cheng, T.Y.; Tsai, M.K.; Chang, Y.C.; Chan, H.T.; Tsai, S.P.; Chiang, P.H.; Hsu, C.C.; Sung, P.K.; Hsu, Y.H.; et al. All-cause mortality attributable to chronic kidney disease: A prospective cohort study based on 462,293 adults in Taiwan. Lancet 2008, 371, 2173–2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wu, M.Y.; Wu, M.S. Taiwan renal care system: A learning health-care system. Nephrology 2018, 23, 112–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Noguchi, M.; Youhira, Y.; Tanaka, M.; Kaneko, S.; Odaira, M.; Anabata, M.; Koshino, Y. Effects of an additional resistance training intervention in hemodialysis patients performing long-term ergometer exercise during dialysis. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2022, 34, 110–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lai, T.S.; Hsu, C.C.; Lin, M.H.; Wu, V.C.; Chen, Y.M. Trends in the incidence and prevalence of end-stage kidney disease requiring dialysis in Taiwan: 2010–2018. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2022, 121, S5–S11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Deckers, K.; Camerino, I.; van Boxtel, M.P.; Verhey, F.R.; Irving, K.; Brayne, C.; Kivipelto, M.; Starr, J.M.; Yaffe, K.; de Leeuw, P.W.; et al. Dementia risk in renal dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Neurology 2017, 88, 198–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Singh-Manoux, A.; Oumarou-Ibrahim, A.; Machado-Fragua, M.D.; Dumurgier, J.; Brunner, E.J.; Kivimaki, M.; Fayosse, A.; Sabia, S. Association between kidney function and incidence of dementia: 10-year follow-up of the Whitehall II cohort study. Age Ageing 2022, 51, afab259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fukunishi, I.; Kitaoka, T.; Shirai, T.; Kino, K.; Kanematsu, E.; Sato, Y. Psychiatric disorders among patients undergoing hemodialysis therapy. Nephron 2002, 91, 344–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Livingston, G.; Huntley, J.; Sommerlad, A.; Ames, D.; Ballard, C.; Banerjee, S.; Brayne, C.; Burns, A.; Cohen-Mansfield, J.; Cooper, C.; et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet 2020, 396, 413–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Collaborators, G.B.D.D. Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019, 18, 88–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Alzheimer’s Association. 2022 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2022, 18, 700–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Balion, C.; Griffith, L.E.; Strifler, L.; Henderson, M.; Patterson, C.; Heckman, G.; Llewellyn, D.J.; Raina, P. Vitamin D, cognition, and dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 2012, 79, 1397–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Buell, J.S.; Dawson-Hughes, B.; Scott, T.M.; Weiner, D.E.; Dallal, G.E.; Qui, W.Q.; Bergethon, P.; Rosenberg, I.H.; Folstein, M.F.; Patz, S.; et al. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D, dementia, and cerebrovascular pathology in elders receiving home services. Neurology 2010, 74, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Annweiler, C.; Schott, A.M.; Allali, G.; Bridenbaugh, S.A.; Kressig, R.W.; Allain, P.; Herrmann, F.R.; Beauchet, O. Association of vitamin D deficiency with cognitive impairment in older women: Cross-sectional study. Neurology 2010, 74, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mokry, L.E.; Ross, S.; Morris, J.A.; Manousaki, D.; Forgetta, V.; Richards, J.B. Genetically decreased vitamin D and risk of Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2016, 87, 2567–2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Llewellyn, D.J.; Lang, I.A.; Langa, K.M.; Muniz-Terrera, G.; Phillips, C.L.; Cherubini, A.; Ferrucci, L.; Melzer, D. Vitamin D and risk of cognitive decline in elderly persons. Arch. Intern. Med. 2010, 170, 1135–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Littlejohns, T.J.; Henley, W.E.; Lang, I.A.; Annweiler, C.; Beauchet, O.; Chaves, P.H.; Fried, L.; Kestenbaum, B.R.; Kuller, L.H.; Langa, K.M.; et al. Vitamin D and the risk of dementia and Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2014, 83, 920–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Lai, R.H.; Hsu, C.C.; Yu, B.H.; Lo, Y.R.; Hsu, Y.Y.; Chen, M.H.; Juang, J.L. Vitamin D supplementation worsens Alzheimer’s progression: Animal model and human cohort studies. Aging Cell 2022, 21, e13670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. McAdams-DeMarco, M.A.; Daubresse, M.; Bae, S.; Gross, A.L.; Carlson, M.C.; Segev, D.L. Dementia, Alzheimer’s Disease, and Mortality after Hemodialysis Initiation. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2018, 13, 1339–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Williams, S.; Malatesta, K.; Norris, K. Vitamin D and chronic kidney disease. Ethn. Dis. 2009, 19, S5. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hung, P.H.; Yeh, C.C.; Hsiao, C.Y.; Sung, P.S.; Muo, C.H.; Sung, F.C.; Hung, K.Y.; Tsai, K.J. End stage renal disease is associated with development of dementia. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 107348–107355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Wolfgram, D.F.; Szabo, A.; Murray, A.M.; Whittle, J. Risk of dementia in peritoneal dialysis patients compared with hemodialysis patients. Perit. Dial. Int. 2015, 35, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sun, M.; Chang, C.L.; Lu, C.Y.; Zhang, J.; Wu, S.Y. Effect of opioids on cancer survival in patients with chronic pain: A propensity score-matched population-based cohort study. Br. J. Anaesth. 2022, 128, 708–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, J.; Lu, C.Y.; Chen, H.M.; Wu, S.Y. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Endocrine Therapy for Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast With High Hormone Receptor Positivity and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Negativity. JAMA Netw. Open 2021, 4, e211785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wu, S.Y.; Chang, C.L.; Chen, C.I.; Huang, C.C. Comparison of Acute and Chronic Surgical Complications Following Robot-Assisted, Laparoscopic, and Traditional Open Radical Prostatectomy Among Men in Taiwan. JAMA Netw. Open 2021, 4, e2120156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lin, K.C.; Chen, T.M.; Yuan, K.S.; Wu, A.T.H.; Wu, S.Y. Assessment of Predictive Scoring System for 90-Day Mortality Among Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Who Have Completed Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e1920671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Sun, M.; Lin, J.A.; Chang, C.L.; Wu, S.Y.; Zhang, J. Association between long-term opioid use and cancer risk in patients with chronic pain: A propensity score-matched cohort study. Br. J. Anaesth. 2022, 129, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, C.M.; Lee, C.T. Association of Hearing Loss With Dementia. JAMA Netw. Open 2019, 2, e198112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Shih, Y.J.; Wang, J.Y.; Wang, Y.H.; Shih, R.R.; Yang, Y.J. Analyses and identification of ICD codes for dementias in the research based on the NHIRD: A scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2022, 12, e062654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wong, C.S.; Lin, Y.C.; Hong, L.Y.; Chen, T.T.; Ma, H.P.; Hsu, Y.H.; Tsai, S.H.; Lin, Y.F.; Wu, M.Y. Increased Long-Term Risk of Dementia in Patients With Carbon Monoxide Poisoning: A Population-Based Study. Medicine 2016, 95, e2549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hsieh, C.Y.; Chen, C.H.; Li, C.Y.; Lai, M.L. Validating the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke in a National Health Insurance claims database. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2015, 114, 254–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Cheng, C.L.; Kao, Y.H.; Lin, S.J.; Lee, C.H.; Lai, M.L. Validation of the National Health Insurance Research Database with ischemic stroke cases in Taiwan. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2011, 20, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hsieh, C.Y.; Su, C.C.; Shao, S.C.; Sung, S.F.; Lin, S.J.; Kao Yang, Y.H.; Lai, E.C. Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database: Past and future. Clin. Epidemiol. 2019, 11, 349–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Zhang, Z.; Kim, H.J.; Lonjon, G.; Zhu, Y.; written on behalf of AME Big-Data Clinical Trial Collaborative Group. Balance diagnostics after propensity score matching. Ann. Transl. Med. 2019, 7, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Polk, R.E.; Fox, C.; Mahoney, A.; Letcavage, J.; MacDougall, C. Measurement of adult antibacterial drug use in 130 US hospitals: Comparison of defined daily dose and days of therapy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007, 44, 664–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yaffe, K.; Ackerson, L.; Kurella Tamura, M.; Le Blanc, P.; Kusek, J.W.; Sehgal, A.R.; Cohen, D.; Anderson, C.; Appel, L.; Desalvo, K.; et al. Chronic kidney disease and cognitive function in older adults: Findings from the chronic renal insufficiency cohort cognitive study. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2010, 58, 338–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kurella, M.; Chertow, G.M.; Fried, L.F.; Cummings, S.R.; Harris, T.; Simonsick, E.; Satterfield, S.; Ayonayon, H.; Yaffe, K. Chronic kidney disease and cognitive impairment in the elderly: The health, aging, and body composition study. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2005, 16, 2127–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Livingston, G.; Sommerlad, A.; Orgeta, V.; Costafreda, S.G.; Huntley, J.; Ames, D.; Ballard, C.; Banerjee, S.; Burns, A.; Cohen-Mansfield, J.; et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. Lancet 2017, 390, 2673–2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Masoumi, A.; Goldenson, B.; Ghirmai, S.; Avagyan, H.; Zaghi, J.; Abel, K.; Zheng, X.; Espinosa-Jeffrey, A.; Mahanian, M.; Liu, P.T.; et al. 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 interacts with curcuminoids to stimulate amyloid-beta clearance by macrophages of Alzheimer’s disease patients. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2009, 17, 703–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mizwicki, M.T.; Menegaz, D.; Zhang, J.; Barrientos-Duran, A.; Tse, S.; Cashman, J.R.; Griffin, P.R.; Fiala, M. Genomic and nongenomic signaling induced by 1alpha,25(OH)2-vitamin D3 promotes the recovery of amyloid-beta phagocytosis by Alzheimer’s disease macrophages. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2012, 29, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Dursun, E.; Gezen-Ak, D.; Yilmazer, S. A novel perspective for Alzheimer’s disease: Vitamin D receptor suppression by amyloid-beta and preventing the amyloid-beta induced alterations by vitamin D in cortical neurons. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2011, 23, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Brondum-Jacobsen, P.; Nordestgaard, B.G.; Schnohr, P.; Benn, M. 25-hydroxyvitamin D and symptomatic ischemic stroke: An original study and meta-analysis. Ann. Neurol. 2013, 73, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Annweiler, C.; Montero-Odasso, M.; Hachinski, V.; Seshadri, S.; Bartha, R.; Beauchet, O. Vitamin D concentration and lateral cerebral ventricle volume in older adults. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2013, 57, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Zieneldien, T.; Kim, J.; Cao, C. The Multifaceted Role of Neuroprotective Plants in Alzheimer’s Disease Treatment. Geriatrics 2022, 7, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chang, D.; Liu, J.; Bilinski, K.; Xu, L.; Steiner, G.Z.; Seto, S.W.; Bensoussan, A. Herbal Medicine for the Treatment of Vascular Dementia: An Overview of Scientific Evidence. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 2016, 7293626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Deaton, A.; Cartwright, N. Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials. Soc. Sci. Med. 2018, 210, 2–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ramesh, S.; James, M.T.; Holroyd-Leduc, J.M.; Wilton, S.B.; Seely, E.W.; Wheeler, D.C.; Ahmed, S.B. Sex Hormone Status in Women With Chronic Kidney Disease: Survey of Nephrologists’ and Renal Allied Health Care Providers’ Perceptions. Can. J. Kidney Health Dis. 2017, 4, 2054358117734534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary Reference Intakes for Thiamin, Riboflavin, Niacin, Vitamin B6, Folate, Vitamin B12, Pantothenic Acid, Biotin, and Choline; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  48. Marcinowska-Suchowierska, E.; Kupisz-Urbanska, M.; Lukaszkiewicz, J.; Pludowski, P.; Jones, G. Vitamin D Toxicity—A Clinical Perspective. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Life 13 01741 g001
Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of dementia in patients with and without vitamin D supplementation.
Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of dementia in patients with and without vitamin D supplementation.
Life 13 01741 g001
Life 13 01741 g002
Figure 2. Subgroup analysis by age of dementia risk in patients with and without vitamin D supplementation. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; adj HR, adjusted hazard ratio.
Figure 2. Subgroup analysis by age of dementia risk in patients with and without vitamin D supplementation. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; adj HR, adjusted hazard ratio.
Life 13 01741 g002
Table 1. Characteristics of patients on hemodialysis with and without vitamin D supplementation (after propensity score matching).
Table 1. Characteristics of patients on hemodialysis with and without vitamin D supplementation (after propensity score matching).
Without Vitamin D SupplementationWith Vitamin D Supplementation
N = 712N = 712 p Value
N%N%
Sex 0.6332
     Female36451.12%37352.39%
     Male34848.88%33947.61%
Age (years) 0.9735
     40–50 28439.89%27638.76%
     51–6018425.84%19026.69%
     61–7013919.52%14119.80%
     >7010514.75%10514.75%
Income level (NTD) 0.8510
        Low income11816.57%12717.84%
        ≤20,0009012.64%8812.36%
        20,001–30,00033947.61%32545.65%
        >30,00016523.17%17224.16%
Hospital type 0.9195
     Medical center16423.03%17023.88%
     Regional hospital44963.06%44262.08%
     Clinic9913.90%10014.04%
Dementia-related comorbidities
     Myocardial infarction273.79%243.37%0.6688
     Coronary heart disease19226.97%19727.67%0.7662
     Heart failure15121.21%14920.93%0.8966
     Peripheral vascular disease689.55%7710.81%0.4303
     Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease17224.16%19126.83%0.2480
     Atrial fibrillation131.83%101.40%0.5283
     Hypertension54876.97%54977.11%0.9498
     Diabetes27438.48%28339.75%0.6250
     Dyslipidemia28540.03%29841.85%0.4836
     Traumatic head injury111.54%121.69%0.8335
     Depression334.63%436.04%0.2384
     Hearing loss233.23%243.37%0.8821
     Sleep apnea40.56%50.70%0.7381
     Peptic ulcer disease29341.15%27538.62%0.3300
     Chronic liver disease22932.16%21329.92%0.3594
     Rheumatic diseases466.46%466.46%0.9999
Follow-up (years)
Mean ± SD		8.87 ± 5.298.72 ± 5.050.5446
Follow-up (years)
Median (IQR, Q1, Q3)		7.83 (2.66, 10.53)7.93 (3.84, 12.32)
Outcomes
     Dementia7210.11%375.20%0.0023
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; NTD, new Taiwan dollars; N, number; IQR, interquartile range; Q1, first quartile; Q3, third quartile.
Table 2. Results of Cox proportional hazards regression model of dementia risk in patients on hemodialysis with and without vitamin D supplementation.
Table 2. Results of Cox proportional hazards regression model of dementia risk in patients on hemodialysis with and without vitamin D supplementation.
Crude HR95% CIp Value Adjusted HR *95% CIp Value
Vitamin D supplementation
    Without vitamin D supplementation (ref.)1.00 1.00
    With vitamin D supplementation0.46(0.32, 0.64)<0.00010.44(0.29, 0.69)<0.0001
Sex
    Female (ref.)1.00 1.00
    Male0.87(0.72, 1.05)0.14990.68(0.42, 1.09)0.1075
Age (years)
    40–50 (ref.)1.00 1.00
    51–602.28(1.15, 5.01)<0.00012.51(1.59, 7.76)0.0019
    61–704.25(3.27, 9.29)<0.00014.18(3.85, 9.40)<0.0001
    >706.31(5.24, 13.39)<0.00016.76(5.36, 11.23)<0.0001
Income level (NTD)
       Low income (ref.)1.00 1.00
       ≤20,0000.84(0.61, 1.14)0.25420.50(0.25, 1.19)0.2464
       20,001–30,0000.91(0.73, 1.13)0.38650.48(0.28, 1.22)0.3274
       >$30,0000·62(0.45, 1.26)0.35540.44(0.21, 1.14)0.3470
Hospital type
    Clinic (ref.)1.00 1.00
    Regional hospital1.12(0.90, 1.39)0.3011.04(0.56, 1.94)0.9039
    Medical center0.92(0.67, 1.26)0.61880.56(0.26, 1.22)0·1459
Dementia-related comorbidities
    Myocardial infarction0.77(0.52, 1.14)0.19452.32(0.98, 5.44)0.0544
    Coronary heart disease1.02(0.82, 1.25)0.88011.32(0.78, 2.22)0.3060
    Heart failure1.10(0.90, 1.34)0.37440.77(0.48, 1.26)0.3026
    Peripheral vascular disease1.13(0.89, 1.43)0.32030.52(0.25, 1.10)0.0863
    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease1.09(0.9, 1.33)0.38571.07(0.64, 1.78)0.8071
    Atrial fibrillation1.31(0.84, 2.03)0.23290.70(0.81, 5.13)0.7233
    Hypertension1.28(0.95, 1.73)0.10741.99(0.96, 3.73)0.3257
    Diabetes1.27(1.03, 1.57)0.02481.09(0.66, 1.81)0.7304
    Dyslipidemia0.98(0.79, 1.2)0.81161.78(0.85, 3.01)0.2321
    Traumatic head injury1.66(0.92, 2.99)0.09021.85(0.85, 3.24)0.2169
    Depression1.72(1.32, 2.24)<0.00011.03(0.44, 2.39)0.9426
    Hearing loss1.69(1.25, 2.29)0.00061.91(0.66, 5.50)0.2298
    Sleep apnea0.76(0.52, 1.14)0.06720.70(0.58, 1.10)0.9823
    Peptic ulcer disease1.14(0.93, 1.39)0.19870.98(0.61, 1.55)0.9217
    Chronic liver disease1.19(0.98, 1.45)0.08450.67(0.40, 1.13)0.1313
    Rheumatic diseases0.87(0.61, 1.23)0.42091.82(0.83, 4.02)0.1365
Abbreviations: NTD, new Taiwan dollars; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; ref., reference group. * All covariates presented in Table 2 were adjusted for.
Table 3. Adjusted hazard ratios for dementia of vitamin D supplementation at various dosages.
Table 3. Adjusted hazard ratios for dementia of vitamin D supplementation at various dosages.
0 μg/Week70–105 μg/Week106–350 μg/Week351–1000 Μg/Week>1000 μg/Week
DementiaN%N%N%N%N%
    No 64089.89%14194.00%16594.83%18594.87%18495.34%
    Yes7210.11%96.00%95.17%105.13%94.66%
p for trend
aHR * (95% CI)1.00ref.0.51(0.23, 0.92)0.49(0.26, 0.93)0.43(0.22, 0.84)0.41(0.24, 0.81)<0.0001
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; N, number; ref., reference group. * All covariates presented in Table 2 were adjusted for.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, C.-L.; Chen, W.-M.; Jao, A.-T.; Shia, B.-C.; Wu, S.-Y. The Protective Effect of Vitamin D on Dementia Risk in Hemodialysis Patients. Life 2023, 13, 1741. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13081741

AMA Style

Lin C-L, Chen W-M, Jao A-T, Shia B-C, Wu S-Y. The Protective Effect of Vitamin D on Dementia Risk in Hemodialysis Patients. Life. 2023; 13(8):1741. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13081741

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Chih-Lang, Wan-Ming Chen, An-Tzu Jao, Ben-Chang Shia, and Szu-Yuan Wu. 2023. "The Protective Effect of Vitamin D on Dementia Risk in Hemodialysis Patients" Life 13, no. 8: 1741. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13081741

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop