Next Article in Journal
Allogenic Bone Graft in Dentistry: A Review of Current Trends and Developments
Previous Article in Journal
A Journey to Reach the Ovary Using Next-Generation Technologies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Binding of βL-Crystallin with Models of Animal and Human Eye Lens-Lipid Membrane
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Novel CRYGC Mutation in Conserved Ultraviolet-Protective Tryptophan (p.Trp131Arg) Is Linked to Autosomal Dominant Congenital Cataract

1
Institute of Medical Molecular Genetics, University of Zurich, 8952 Schlieren, Switzerland
2
Department of Ophthalmology, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland
3
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
4
Neuroscience Center Zürich (ZNZ), University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
5
Zurich Center for Integrative Human Physiology (ZIHP), University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(23), 16594; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242316594
Submission received: 27 August 2023 / Revised: 13 October 2023 / Accepted: 14 November 2023 / Published: 22 November 2023

Abstract

:
Congenital cataract (CC), the most prevalent cause of childhood blindness and amblyopia, necessitates prompt and precise genetic diagnosis. The objective of this study is to identify the underlying genetic cause in a Swiss patient with isolated CC. Whole exome sequencing (WES) and copy number variation (CNV) analysis were conducted for variant identification in a patient born with a total binocular CC without a family history of CC. Sanger Sequencing was used to confirm the variant and segregation analysis was used to screen the non-affected parents. The first de novo missense mutation at c.391T>C was identified in exon 3 of CRYGC on chromosome 2 causing the substitution of a highly conserved Tryptophan to an Arginine located at p.Trp131Arg. Previous studies exhibit significant changes in the tertiary structure of the crystallin family in the following variant locus, making CRYGC prone to aggregation aggravated by photodamage resulting in cataract. The variant can be classified as pathogenic according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) criteria (PP3 + PM1 + PM2 + PS2; scoring 10 points). The identification of this novel variant expands the existing knowledge on the range of variants found in the CRYGC gene and contributes to a better comprehension of cataract heterogeneity.

1. Introduction

Congenital cataract (CC), referring to any light scattering due to clouding of the crystalline lens detected at birth, is one of the leading causes of treatable childhood blindness and amblyopia worldwide [1,2,3]. It affects one to nine newborns per 10,000 live births globally [4]. Approximately 50% of CCs are inherited [5]. Inherited cataracts can phenotypically be distinguished by localization (i.e., polar, nuclear, lamellar, cortical, total), type of opacity (i.e., solid, pulverulent, blue dot, crystalline), and presence of sutural opacity (affecting y-sutures of the fetal lens nucleus), and are described accordingly: anterior polar, posterior polar, lamellar, cortical, nuclear, aculeiform, total, pulverulent, cerulean, or polymorphic cataracts [6]. Inherited CC may manifest independently (70%), with other ocular abnormalities (e.g., microphthalmia being the most common) (15%), or in conjunction with other systemic findings i.e., syndromic (15%) [7,8]. They are predominantly inherited in an autosomal dominant manner, therefore particularly penetrant, and display an extensive genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity; thus, it challenging to establish a genotype–phenotype correlation in CC [8,9]. The detection efficiency of genetic variants in familial and sporadic cataracts varies greatly. Panel-based sequencing shows a detection rate of around 75% in familial cases and ranges from 26% to 68% in sporadic cases [10,11]. Unknown genetic and nongenetic factors contribute to sporadic cases [11]. Whole exome sequencing (WES) has been shown to offer a higher diagnostic yield compared to a panel-based analysis, and according to recent studies, WES represents the genetic test of choice rather than whole genome sequencing (WGS) [9,12]. To date, the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) documented the identification of 49 loci and 37 genes associated with isolated CC (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim/ (accessed on 9 July 2023)). These associated genes can broadly be grouped into cytoplasmic proteins (i.e., crystallins), membrane proteins (i.e., connexins, aquaporins), cytoskeletal proteins, and DNA/RNA-binding proteins (i.e., transcription factors) [13,14].
Crystallin proteins make up over 90% of the soluble human lens protein; they are non-renewable, thus unusually stable serving a lifetime, and play a pivotal role in maintaining lens transparency and the refractive index of the lens [15,16]. Numerous mutations in the 12 crystallin (CRY) genes have been identified, accounting for almost 50% of all autosomal dominant inherited cataracts in humans described thus far [14]. There are three groups of crystallin proteins, α-, β-, and γ-crystallins. α-crystallins are small heat shock proteins. They exert their chaperone function by binding to unfolded or damaged β- and γ-crystallins to prevent their aggregation, preserving lens transparency [13]. β- and γ-crystallins function as structural proteins and contain Greek key domains as secondary protein structures [13]. A primary distinction between β- and γ-crystallins lies in their ability to assemble into oligomers. While γ-crystallins solely occur to be monomeric, β-crystallins have the capacity to form various oligomeric structures, like homomers or heteromers, ranging from dimers to octamers [17]. It is known that the Greek key domains in γ-crystallin contain four highly conserved Tryptophan (Trp) residues (i.e., Trp43, Trp69, Trp131, and Trp157), crucial for both protein stability and enabling ultraviolet radiation (UV) absorption with minimal protein damage (as in protein aggregation), which maintains lens transparency, ensuring UV protection for the retina [17,18]. Extensive photodamage to Trp residues within β- and γ-crystallin has widely been implicated as a contributing factor in the development of age-related cataracts [19]. The four conserved Trp residues display an efficient fluorescence quenching mechanism, which is understood to be an evolved property of protein folding, allowing UV absorption with minimal protein photodamage and delayed cataract formation [18].
In this study, we identified a de novo missense mutation in the crystallin γC (CRYGC) gene using WES, causing a substitution of one of the highly conserved Tryptophan at p.Trp131Arg in a patient with congenital nuclear cataract.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient

The index patient was identified through the cataract genetic study. The cataract genetic study at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, together with the Institute of Medical Molecular Genetics, University of Zurich, aims to characterize congenital cataracts by phenotype and genotype identification. Patients are identified and recruited through close collaboration with other ophthalmic centers in Switzerland. A detailed retrospective chart review was performed. In addition, the father received an undilated eye examination. Blood samples were collected from the index patient and both parents. The study adhered to the Good Clinical Practices and followed the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki [20]. Approval for genetic testing in human patients was awarded to the Institute of Medical Molecular Genetics by the Cantonal Ethics Committee of Zurich (Ref-No. 2019-00108). Written consent of the legal guardian of the patient was obtained.

2.2. Genes of Interest

The gene list of Rechsteiner et al. 2021 [9] was expanded through the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) as well as a current literature search (Supplementary Material, Table S1). The gene list compiles cataract-associated candidate genes (syndromic and non-syndromic phenotypes), as well as cataract-associated genes in animal models.

2.3. Exome Sequencing and Analysis

We performed exome sequencing and analysis as previously described [9,21,22]. In brief, DNA was isolated from venous blood samples using the Chemagic DNA Blood Kit (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA), fragmentation was executed using M220 Sonicator (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA), and library preparation was performed using the IDT-Illumina TruSeq DNA Exome protocol (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA and Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, USA). Paired-end sequencing (2 × 75 bp) was executed using the NextSeq 550 instrument (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The reads were aligned to the human genome (GRCh37) and variant calling was accomplished using Burrows–Wheeler Aligner (BWA) v0.7.17 on BaseSpace Onsite (Illumina). AlamutBatch version 1.10 (Interactive Biosoftware, Rouen, France) was used for variant annotation. Copy number variations (CNVs) within the genes of interest (Table S1) were collected from exome coverage depth data (Sequence Pilot version 5.0; JSI Medical Systems GmbH, Ettenheim, Germany). Variants with a heterozygous allele frequency > 1%, a homozygous allele frequency > 0.01% (gnomAD heterozygous, and homozygous frequency of all populations; https://gnomad.broadinsitute.org/ (accessed on 12 June 2023)), and a Combined Annotation-Dependent Depletion (CADD) score ≤ 20 were discarded.

2.4. Segregation Analysis

Segregation analysis was performed using Sanger sequencing as described in detail by Haug et al. (2021) [21]. In brief, the region of interest was amplified by PCR. Cycle sequencing was performed on the PCR products using BigDye™ Terminator V1.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), followed by ethanol precipitation purification, and sequencing on a SeqStudio (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) capillary sequencer.

3. Results

3.1. Case Presentation

The patient was diagnosed with an abnormal red reflex at the age of 2.5 months and referred for further evaluation to the Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen. Examination revealed a bilateral symmetrical dense and almost complete nuclear cataract not allowing fundus visibility. No associated ocular anomalies were diagnosed, particularly no microcornea or microphthalmia. The child was born on term, was developing well, and did not show any dysmorphic and/or systemic features. The family history did not reveal CCs, developmental and/or ocular anomalies, and consanguinity is not known. Lensectomy with primary posterior capsulotomy and anterior vitrectomy were performed in both eyes immediately after the diagnosis, within one week apart. The postoperative course in the left eye was complicated by increased inflammation despite intensive topical antibiotic and steroid treatment. After a second surgical intervention with detailed synechiolysis, no further complications occurred. Refractive correction was achieved by contact lens correction and bifocal glasses for near. Convergent strabismus and amblyopia in the right eye were diagnosed at the age of 13 months. Additionally, a secondary high-frequency pendular nystagmus to the left was described. Amblyopia treatment with patching therapy was initiated. Bilateral aphakic glaucoma was diagnosed at the age of 17 months and treated with topical anti-glaucomatous medication. The patient received cyclophotocoagulation in the right eye at three years of age. Intraocular pressure was controlled by topical medication until the last follow-up at the age of 10 years. The optic nerve displayed an increased cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) of 0.8 in the right eye. At this age, visual acuity (Snellen decimal) with contact lenses (right eye 10.75 diopters (dpt), left eye 14.5 dpt) and near correction of +6.0 dpt measured 0.2 and 0.3 at distance, and 0.3 and 0.4 at near, for the right and left eye, respectively.

3.2. Segregation Analysis

An index patient WES data analysis of the selected genes (n = 278) revealed a total of 475 variants (12 deletions, 1 insertion, 6 duplications, and 456 substitutions). Due to the index patient being the only affected family member, we focused our filtering on de novo and recessive variants. Filtering for variants with heterozygous allele frequency ≤ 1% and homozygous allele frequency ≤ 0.01% revealed seven variants with a CADD score ≥ 20, one of which was revealed to be classified as pathogenic (PP3 + PM1 + PM2 + PS2; scoring 10 points) by means of the standard guidelines of interpretations according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) [23] and highly damaging (score of 0.983 HumVar, sensitivity: 0.56; specificity: 0.94) according to PolyPhen2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph/ (accessed on 9 June 2023)). The identified variant, located in exon 3 (c.391T>C) of CRYGC (RefSeq NM_ 020989.4), causes a protein change from a highly conserved Tryptophan across species (Figure 1) with a phyloP score of 7.02 (indicating a high level of evolutionary conservation) to Arginine in codon 131 (p.Trp131Arg) (Table 1). No mosaicism was found in either blood sample; however, germline mosaicism remains unknown. Due to absence of the variant in both parents, it is considered de novo and has been verified using Sanger Sequencing as indicated (Figure 2).

4. Discussion

The CRYGC protein, like all γ-crystallins, exhibits a distinctive structural arrangement with a two-domain β-structure, consisting of four Greek key motifs that are remarkably similar in their folding pattern, displaying a high degree of symmetry and strong stability consequently [24]. As indicated in Table 2, 41 disease-causing mutations have been identified in CRYGC thus far, all of which cause various types of CC with or without microphthalmia. Most CRYGC mutations display a severe disruption of protein stability and symmetry due to either a frameshift or stop gain mutation (Table 2). Chen et al. (2009) [18] revealed significant findings on the ability to effectively quench excited states through electrostatic interactions of four highly conserved Tryptophans (Trp 43, Trp69, Trp131, and Trp 157) on a protein basis, to be an evolved property of all γ-crystallins to maintain the tertiary structure as a form of UV protection. Thus far, only 14 CRYGC missense mutations have been published, none of which affect these highly conserved Tryptophans (Table 2).
Out of all crystallin families, only five mutations in conserved Tryptophans have been published thus far (Table 3). Wang et al. (2011) [59] reported the first human γ-crystallin mutation in one of the four conserved Trp residues, p.Trp43Arg in CRYGD, in a Chinese family with autosomal dominant nuclear CC, revealing notable alteration in the tertiary structure despite a lack of secondary structural changes, as well as protein aggregation upon UV radiation of the CRYGD mutant. Ji et al. (2013) [60], on the contrary, described a very similar x-ray structure between the wild-type CRYGD and the p.Trp43Arg mutant. Instead, a significant change in the stability and solubility behavior has been demonstrated, particularly in terms of protein folding and unfolding dynamics, being responsible for cataract formation (i.e., protein precipitation and aggregation) [60]. Interestingly, there is a link between the p.Trp43Arg CRYGD mutant and UV-damaged wild-type CRYGD (i.e., in age-related cataract), displaying similar precipitation dynamics in vitro [60]. Rao et al. (2013) [61] demonstrated that UV light, in the later stages of gestation of mouse fetuses, plays a significant role in activating melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells, thus preparing the fetal eye for vision by regulating retinal neuron number. They measured visceral cavity photon flux to be sufficient to activate certain regulating signals for retinal development in the fetal mouse eye [61]. Many studies cover the overall effect of UV radiation in pregnancy, but none indicate the effect of direct UV on the unborn child, let alone the fetal lens. Though UVA (320–400 nm) can penetrate to the dermis [62], it ultimately remains unknown how much UV effectively reaches the human fetal lens. Hence, the UV protective character of conserved Tryptophans in crystallins resembles an observation on the protein basis of these crystallin mutations only.
Mutations in two conserved Tryptophans were also found to be responsible for CC in β-crystallins like CRYBB2, in which mutations at p.Trp59Arg and p.Trp151Arg/Cys were reported to cause a significant change in the structural integrity and stability of β-crystallin, even more so than γ-crystallins [17,63,64,65,66] (Table 3). Xu et al. (2021) [64] identified a family with progressive cortical CC due to a Trp151Arg mutation in CRYBB2, displaying that the mutant protein increasingly misfolds, exposing hydrophobic side chains in the fourth Greek key, making it prone to aggregate. Interestingly, a complete prevention or reverse effect was described in vitro after lanosterol application to the pTrp151Arg mutant, posing a potential therapy option for CC patients with p.Trp151Arg mutations in CRYBB2 [64]. However, children born with a dense CC may not be the target patient cohort for this approach.
To the best of our knowledge, we describe the first human nuclear CC caused by a novel de novo missense mutation at a highly conserved Tryptophan position, p.Trp131Arg, in the CRYGC gene, hypothesizing a similar disruption in the tertiary structure and solubility and stability dynamics in CRYGC. Functional assays would be necessary to provide conclusive evidence for pathogenicity of this specific variant.

5. Conclusions

We identified a novel de novo missense variant, c.391T>C, within exon 3 in CRYGC causing congenital nuclear cataract in a patient. Our findings expand the current understanding of the range of variants present in CRYGC and contribute crucial insight into the heterogeneity of inherited cataracts in the pediatric population.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms242316594/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.G.-K. and W.B.; methodology, S.K., C.G.-K. and W.B.; validation, F.D., S.K. and S.F., formal analysis, F.D., S.K. and S.F.; investigation, F.D., S.K. and S.F.; resources, C.G.-K. and W.B.; writing—original draft preparation, F.D.; writing—review and editing, F.D., S.K., C.G.-K., I.D. and W.B.; visualization, F.D.; supervision, S.K., C.G.-K. and W.B.; project administration, C.G.-K. and W.B.; funding acquisition, C.G.-K. and W.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by a grant from the Hedy Glor-Meyer Stiftung of the University Hospital Zurich Foundation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study adhered to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and obtained approval from the Cantonal Ethics Committee of Zurich (Ref-No. 2019-00108, 18 March 2019). Genetic testing on human patients was granted approval by the Federal Office for Public Health (FOPH) in Switzerland and entrusted to the Institute of Medical Molecular Genetics. The legal guardian of the participant was provided with comprehensive and informed explanations regarding the study procedures and their voluntary participation was obtained.

Informed Consent Statement

Signed informed consent was obtained from the legal guardians of the subject involved in the analysis.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the patient and family for their participation and cooperation in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no involvement in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, manuscript writing, or the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Jain, I.S.; Pillay, P.; Gangwar, D.N.; Dhir, S.P.; Kaul, V.K. Congenital Cataract: Etiology and Morphology. J. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus 1983, 20, 238–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wu, X.; Long, E.; Lin, H.; Liu, Y. Prevalence and Epidemiological Characteristics of Congenital Cataract: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Messina-Baas, O.; Cuevas-Covarrubias, S.A. Inherited Congenital Cataract: A Guide to Suspect the Genetic Etiology in the Cataract Genesis. Mol. Syndromol. 2017, 8, 58–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sheeladevi, S.; Lawrenson, J.G.; Fielder, A.R.; Suttle, C.M. Global Prevalence of Childhood Cataract: A Systematic Review. Eye 2016, 30, 1160–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pichi, F.; Lembo, A.; Serafino, M.; Nucci, P. Genetics of Congenital Cataract. Dev. Ophthalmol. 2016, 57, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Reddy, M.A.; Francis, P.J.; Berry, V.; Bhattacharya, S.S.; Moore, A.T. Molecular Genetic Basis of Inherited Cataract and Associated Phenotypes. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2004, 49, 300–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yi, J.; Yun, J.; Li, Z.K.; Xu, C.T.; Pan, B.R. Epidemiology and Molecular Genetics of Congenital Cataracts. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2011, 4, 422–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Berry, V.; Georgiou, M.; Fujinami, K.; Quinlan, R.; Moore, A.; Michaelides, M. Inherited Cataracts: Molecular Genetics, Clinical Features, Disease Mechanisms and Novel Therapeutic Approaches. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 104, 1331–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rechsteiner, D.; Issler, L.; Koller, S.; Lang, E.; Bähr, L.; Feil, S.; Rüegger, C.M.; Kottke, R.; Toelle, S.P.; Zweifel, N.; et al. Genetic Analysis in a Swiss Cohort of Bilateral Congenital Cataract. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021, 139, 691–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gillespie, R.L.; O’Sullivan, J.; Ashworth, J.; Bhaskar, S.; Williams, S.; Biswas, S.; Kehdi, E.; Ramsden, S.C.; Clayton-Smith, J.; Black, G.C.; et al. Personalized Diagnosis and Management of Congenital Cataract by Next-Generation Sequencing. Ophthalmology 2014, 121, 2124–2137.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tavtigian, S.V.; Deffenbaugh, A.M.; Yin, L.; Judkins, T.; Scholl, T.; Samollow, P.B.; De Silva, D.; Zharkikh, A.; Thomas, A. Comprehensive Statistical Study of 452 BRCA1 Missense Substitutions with Classification of Eight Recurrent Substitutions as Neutral. J. Med. Genet. 2006, 43, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jackson, D.; Malka, S.; Harding, P.; Palma, J.; Dunbar, H.; Moosajee, M. Molecular Diagnostic Challenges for Non-Retinal Developmental Eye Disorders in the United Kingdom. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part C Semin. Med. Genet. 2020, 184, 578–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Peng, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Deng, Z.; Zhang, S.; Tan, Y.; Hu, Z.; Tao, L.; Luo, Y. Case Report: A de Novo Variant of CRYGC Gene Associated with Congenital Cataract and Microphthalmia. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 866246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shiels, A.; Hejtmancik, J.F. Molecular Genetics of Cataract. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2015, 134, 203–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Santana, A.; Waiswol, M. The Genetic and Molecular Basis of Congenital Cataract. Arq. Bras. Oftalmol. 2011, 74, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bloemendal, H.; De Jong, W.; Jaenicke, R.; Lubsen, N.H.; Slingsby, C.; Tardieu, A. Ageing and Vision: Structure, Stability and Function of Lens Crystallins. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2004, 86, 407–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhao, W.J.; Xu, J.; Chen, X.J.; Liu, H.H.; Yao, K.; Yan, Y. Bin Effects of Cataract-Causing Mutations W59C and W151C on ΒB2-Crystallin Structure, Stability and Folding. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 103, 764–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, J.; Callis, P.R.; King, J. Mechanism of the Very Efficient Quenching of Tryptophan Fluorescence in Human ΓD- and ΓS-Crystallins: The γ-Crystallin Fold May Have Evolved to Protect Tryptophan Residues from Ultraviolet Photodamage. Biochemistry 2009, 48, 3708–3716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Robman, L.; Taylor, H. External Factors in the Development of Cataract. Eye 2005, 19, 1074–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Association, W.M. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA 2013, 310, 2191–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Haug, P.; Koller, S.; Maggi, J.; Lang, E.; Feil, S.; Wlodarczyk, A.; Bähr, L.; Steindl, K.; Rohrbach, M.; Gerth-Kahlert, C.; et al. Whole Exome Sequencing in Coloboma/Microphthalmia: Identification of Novel and Recurrent Variants in Seven Genes. Genes 2021, 12, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lang, E.; Koller, S.; Bähr, L.; Töteberg-Harms, M.; Atac, D.; Roulez, F.; Bahr, A.; Steindl, K.; Feil, S.; Berger, W.; et al. Exome Sequencing in a Swiss Childhood Glaucoma Cohort Reveals CYP1B1 and FOXC1 Variants as Most Frequent Causes. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2020, 9, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Richards, S.; Aziz, N.; Bale, S.; Bick, D.; Das, S.; Gastier-Foster, J.; Grody, W.W.; Hegde, M.; Lyon, E.; Spector, E.; et al. Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. Off. J. Am. Coll. Med. Genet. 2015, 17, 405–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Blundell, T.; Lindley, P.; Miller, L.; Moss, D.; Slingsby, C.; Turnell, B.; Wistow, G. The molecular structure and stability of the eye lens: X-ray Analysis of y-Crystallin II. Nature. 1981, 289, 773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Héon, E.; Priston, M.; Schorderet, D.F.; Billingsley, G.D.; Girard, P.O.; Lubsen, N.; Munier, F.L. The Gamma-Crystallins and Human Cataracts: A Puzzle Made Clearer. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1999, 65, 1261–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Berry, V.; Ionides, A.; Pontikos, N.; Georgiou, M.; Yu, J.; Ocaka, L.A.; Moore, A.T.; Quinlan, R.A.; Michaelides, M. The Genetic Landscape of Crystallins in Congenital Cataract. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2020, 15, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Astiazarán, M.C.; García-Montaño, L.A.; Sánchez-Moreno, F.; Matiz-Moreno, H.; Zenteno, J.C. Next Generation Sequencing-Based Molecular Diagnosis in Familial Congenital Cataract Expands the Mutational Spectrum in Known Congenital Cataract Genes. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2018, 176, 2637–2645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jiao, X.; Viswanathan, M.; Bobrova, N.F.; Romanova, T.V.; Hejtmancik, J.F. Molecular Genetic Analysis of Ukrainian Families with Congenital Cataracts. Child 2022, 10, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, J.; Sun, D.; Wang, Y.; Mu, W.; Peng, Y.; Mi, D. Identification of a novel CRYGC mutation in a pedigree affected with congenital cataracts. Zhonghua Yixue Yichuanxue Zazhi = Chin. J. Med. Genet. 2019, 36, 697–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fu, C.; Xu, J.; Yang, X.; Chen, X.; Yao, K. Cataract-Causing Mutations L45P and Y46D Impair the Thermal Stability of ΓC-Crystallin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2021, 539, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhong, Z.; Wu, Z.; Han, L.; Chen, J. Novel Mutations in CRYGC Are Associated with Congenital Cataracts in Chinese Families. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kumar, M.; Agarwal, T.; Khokhar, S.; Kumar, M.; Kaur, P.; Roy, T.S.; Dada, R. Mutation Screening and Genotype Phenotype Correlation of α-Crystallin, γ-Crystallin and GJA8 Gene in Congenital Cataract. Mol. Vis. 2011, 17, 693–707. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sun, Z.; Zhou, Q.; Li, H.; Yang, L.; Wu, S.; Sui, R. Mutations in Crystallin Genes Result in Congenital Cataract Associated with Other Ocular Abnormalities. Mol. Vis. 2017, 23, 977–986. [Google Scholar]
  34. Karahan, M.; Demirtaş, A.A.; Erdem, S.; Ava, S.; Tekeş, S.; Keklikçi, U. Crystalline Gene Mutations in Turkish Children with Congenital Cataracts. Int. Ophthalmol. 2021, 41, 2847–2852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Moon, D.; Park, H.W.; Surl, D.; Won, D.; Lee, S.T.; Shin, S.; Choi, J.R.; Han, J. Precision Medicine through Next-Generation Sequencing in Inherited Eye Diseases in a Korean Cohort. Genes 2022, 13, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, J.; Leng, Y.; Han, S.; Yan, L.; Lu, C.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, X.; Cao, L. Clinical and Genetic Characteristics of Chinese Patients with Familial or Sporadic Pediatric Cataract. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2018, 13, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, D.; Wang, S.; Ye, H.; Tang, Y.; Qiu, X.; Fan, Q.; Rong, X.; Liu, X.; Chen, Y.; Yang, J.; et al. Distribution of Gene Mutations in Sporadic Congenital Cataract in a Han Chinese Population. Mol. Vis. 2016, 22, 589–598. [Google Scholar]
  38. Li, X.-Q.; Cai, H.-C.; Zhou, S.-Y.; Yang, J.-H.; Xi, Y.-B.; Gao, X.-B.; Zhao, W.-J.; Li, P.; Zhao, G.-Y.; Tong, Y.; et al. A Novel Mutation Impairing the Tertiary Structure and Stability of ΓC-Crystallin (CRYGC) Leads to Cataract Formation in Humans and Zebrafish Lens. Hum. Mutat. 2012, 33, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xi, Y.-B.; Chen, X.-J.; Zhao, W.-J.; Yan, Y.-B. Congenital Cataract-Causing Mutation G129C in ΓC-Crystallin Promotes the Accumulation of Two Distinct Unfolding Intermediates That Form Highly Toxic Aggregates. J. Mol. Biol. 2015, 427, 2765–2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Prokudin, I.; Simons, C.; Grigg, J.R.; Storen, R.; Kumar, V.; Phua, Z.Y.; Smith, J.; Flaherty, M.; Davila, S.; Jamieson, R. V Exome Sequencing in Developmental Eye Disease Leads to Identification of Causal Variants in GJA8, CRYGC, PAX6 and CYP1B1. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2014, 22, 907–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fan, F.; Luo, Y.; Wu, J.; Gao, C.; Liu, X.; Mei, H.; Zhou, X. The Mutation Spectrum in Familial versus Sporadic Congenital Cataract Based on Next-Generation Sequencing. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020, 20, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ma, A.S.; Grigg, J.R.; Ho, G.; Prokudin, I.; Farnsworth, E.; Holman, K.; Cheng, A.; Billson, F.A.; Martin, F.; Fraser, C.; et al. Sporadic and Familial Congenital Cataracts: Mutational Spectrum and New Diagnoses Using Next-Generation Sequencing. Hum. Mutat. 2016, 37, 371–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Santhiya, S.T.; Shyam Manohar, M.; Rawlley, D.; Vijayalakshmi, P.; Namperumalsamy, P.; Gopinath, P.M.; Löster, J.; Graw, J. Novel Mutations in the Gamma-Crystallin Genes Cause Autosomal Dominant Congenital Cataracts. J. Med. Genet. 2002, 39, 352–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gonzalez-Huerta, L.M.; Messina-Baas, O.M.; Cuevas-Covarrubias, S.A. A Family with Autosomal Dominant Primary Congenital Cataract Associated with a CRYGC Mutation: Evidence of Clinical Heterogeneity. Mol. Vis. 2007, 13, 1333–1338. [Google Scholar]
  45. Devi, R.R.; Yao, W.; Vijayalakshmi, P.; Sergeev, Y.V.; Sundaresan, P.; Hejtmancik, J.F. Crystallin Gene Mutations in Indian Families with Inherited Pediatric Cataract. Mol. Vis. 2008, 14, 1157–1170. [Google Scholar]
  46. Yao, K.; Jin, C.; Zhu, N.; Wang, W.; Wu, R.; Jiang, J.; Shentu, X. A Nonsense Mutation in CRYGC Associated with Autosomal Dominant Congenital Nuclear Cataract in a Chinese Family. Mol. Vis. 2008, 14, 1272–1276. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kandaswamy, D.K.; Vasantha, K.; Graw, J.; Santhiya, S.T. A Novel CRYGC E128* Mutation Underlying an Autosomal Dominant Nuclear Cataract in a South Indian Kindred. Ophthalmic Genet. 2020, 41, 556–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Patel, N.; Anand, D.; Monies, D.; Maddirevula, S.; Khan, A.O.; Algoufi, T.; Alowain, M.; Faqeih, E.; Alshammari, M.; Qudair, A.; et al. Novel Phenotypes and Loci Identified through Clinical Genomics Approaches to Pediatric Cataract. Hum. Genet. 2017, 136, 205–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Reis, L.M.; Tyler, R.C.; Muheisen, S.; Raggio, V.; Salviati, L.; Han, D.P.; Costakos, D.; Yonath, H.; Hall, S.; Power, P.; et al. Whole Exome Sequencing in Dominant Cataract Identifies a New Causative Factor, CRYBA2, and a Variety of Novel Alleles in Known Genes. Hum. Genet. 2013, 132, 761–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Taylan Sekeroglu, H.; Karaosmanoglu, B.; Taskiran, E.Z.; Simsek Kiper, P.O.; Alikasifoglu, M.; Boduroglu, K.; Coskun, T.; Utine, G.E. Molecular Etiology of Isolated Congenital Cataract Using Next-Generation Sequencing: Single Center Exome Sequencing Data from Turkey. Mol. Syndromol. 2020, 11, 302–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, L.; Fu, S.; Ou, Y.; Zhao, T.; Su, Y.; Liu, P. A Novel Nonsense Mutation in CRYGC Is Associated with Autosomal Dominant Congenital Nuclear Cataracts and Microcornea. Mol. Vis. 2009, 15, 276–282. [Google Scholar]
  52. Kessel, L.; Bach-Holm, D.; Al-Bakri, M.; Roos, L.; Lund, A.; Grønskov, K. Genetic Disease Is a Common Cause of Bilateral Childhood Cataract in Denmark. Ophthalmic Genet. 2021, 42, 650–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Guo, Y.; Su, D.; Li, Q.; Yang, Z.; Ma, Z.; Ma, X.; Zhu, S. A Nonsense Mutation of CRYGC Associated with Autosomal Dominant Congenital Nuclear Cataracts and Microcornea in a Chinese Pedigree. Mol. Vis. 2012, 18, 1874–1880. [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhuang, J.; Cao, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, L.; Tong, Y.; Chen, X.; Wang, Y.; Lu, C.; Ma, X.; Yang, J. Mutation Screening of Crystallin Genes in Chinese Families with Congenital Cataracts. Mol. Vis. 2019, 25, 427–437. [Google Scholar]
  55. Ren, Z.; Li, A.; Shastry, B.S.; Padma, T.; Ayyagari, R.; Scott, M.H.; Parks, M.M.; Kaiser-Kupfer, M.I.; Hejtmancik, J.F. A 5-Base Insertion in the GammaC-Crystallin Gene Is Associated with Autosomal Dominant Variable Zonular Pulverulent Cataract. Hum. Genet. 2000, 106, 531–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kondo, Y.; Saitsu, H.; Miyamoto, T.; Lee, B.J.; Nishiyama, K.; Nakashima, M.; Tsurusaki, Y.; Doi, H.; Miyake, N.; Kim, J.H.; et al. Pathogenic Mutations in Two Families with Congenital Cataract Identified with Whole-Exome Sequencing. Mol. Vis. 2013, 19, 384–389. [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhou, Z.; Zhao, L.; Guo, Y.; Zhuang, J.; Zhuo, N.; Chen, H.; Liu, J.; Wang, L. A Novel Mutation in CRYGC Mutation Associated with Autosomal Dominant Congenital Cataracts and Microcornea. Ophthalmol. Sci. 2022, 2, 100093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Fernández-Alcalde, C.; Nieves-Moreno, M.; Noval, S.; Peralta, J.M.; Montaño, V.E.F.; Del Pozo, Á.; Santos-Simarro, F.; Vallespín, E. Molecular and Genetic Mechanism of Non-Syndromic Congenital Cataracts. Mutation Screening in Spanish Families. Genes 2021, 12, 580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, B.; Yu, C.; Xi, Y.B.; Cai, H.C.; Wang, J.; Zhou, S.; Zhou, S.; Wu, Y.; Yan, Y.B.; Ma, X.; et al. A Novel CRYGD Mutation (p.Trp43Arg) Causing Autosomal Dominant Congenital Cataract in a Chinese Family. Hum. Mutat. 2011, 32, 1939–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ji, F.; Jungs, J.; Koharudin, L.M.I.; Gronenborn, A.M. The Human W42R ΓD-Crystallin Mutant Structure Provides a Link between Congenital and Age-Related Cataracts. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rao, S.; Chun, C.; Fan, J.; Kofron, J.M.; Yang, M.B.; Hegde, R.S.; Ferrara, N.; Copenhagen, D.R.; Lang, R.A. A Direct and Melanopsin-Dependent Fetal Light Response Regulates Mouse Eye Development. Nature 2013, 494, 243–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pérez-Sánchez, A.; Barrajón-Catalán, E.; Herranz-López, M.; Micol, V. Nutraceuticals for Skin Care: A Comprehensive Review of Human Clinical Studies. Nutrients 2018, 10, 403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Santhiya, S.T.; Kumar, G.S.; Sudhakar, P.; Gupta, N.; Klopp, N.; Illig, T.; Söker, T.; Groth, M.; Platzer, M.; Gopinath, P.M.; et al. Molecular Analysis of Cataract Families in India: New Mutations in the CRYBB2 and GJA3 Genes and Rare Polymorphisms. Mol. Vis. 2010, 16, 1837–1847. [Google Scholar]
  64. Xu, J.; Wang, H.; Wang, A.; Xu, J.; Fu, C.; Jia, Z.; Yao, K.; Chen, X. ΒB2 W151R Mutant Is Prone to Degradation, Aggregation and Exposes the Hydrophobic Side Chains in the Fourth Greek Key Motif. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Mol. Basis Dis. 2021, 1867, 166018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chen, W.; Chen, X.; Hu, Z.; Lin, H.; Zhou, F.; Luo, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhong, X.; Yang, Y.; Wu, C.; et al. A Missense Mutation in CRYBB2 Leads to Progressive Congenital Membranous Cataract by Impacting the Solubility and Function of ΒB2-Crystallin. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e81290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Santhiya, S.T.; Manisastry, S.M.; Rawlley, D.; Malathi, R.; Anishetty, S.; Gopinath, P.M.; Vijayalakshmi, P.; Namperumalsamy, P.; Adamski, J.; Graw, J. Mutation Analysis of Congenital Cataracts in Indian Families: Identification of SNPs and a New Causative Allele in CRYBB2 Gene. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004, 45, 3599–3607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Amino acid conservation across species (https://www.ensembl.org/index.html (accessed on 4 September 2023)). The Tryptophan (W; marked red) affected by the identified variant is highly conserved among species. Dark blue indicates high, medium blue indicates moderate, light blue indicates minor and white indicates low conservation across species.
Figure 1. Amino acid conservation across species (https://www.ensembl.org/index.html (accessed on 4 September 2023)). The Tryptophan (W; marked red) affected by the identified variant is highly conserved among species. Dark blue indicates high, medium blue indicates moderate, light blue indicates minor and white indicates low conservation across species.
Ijms 24 16594 g001
Figure 2. Sanger Sequencing variant verification.
Figure 2. Sanger Sequencing variant verification.
Ijms 24 16594 g002
Table 1. Disease-causing variant identified by WES.
Table 1. Disease-causing variant identified by WES.
GeneCRYGC
cDNANM_020989.4:c.391T>C
Predicted amino acid changep.Trp131Arg
Zygosityhet
gnomADn/a
Mode of inheritancead
RegionExon 3
ACMGpathogenic (PP3 + PM1 + PM2 + PS2) [23]
Acronyms: ACMG, American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics; het, heterozygous; n/a, not available; ad, autosomal dominant.
Table 2. Previously described disease-causing CRYGC variants.
Table 2. Previously described disease-causing CRYGC variants.
Exon/
Intron
cDNAAmino Acid ChangeCoding EffectProtein
Domain
PhenotypeReference
Exon 2NM_020989.4:c.13A>Cp.Thr5Promissense1st Greek keyCoppock-like CCHeon et al. (1999) [25]; Berry et al. (2020) [26]
Exon 2NM_020989.4:c.17T>Cp.Phe6Sermissense1st Greek keyLamellar CCAstiazaran et al. (2018) [27]
Exon 2NM_020989.4:c.83C>Tp.Pro28Leumissense1st Greek keyNuclear CC + microphthalmos + nystagmusJiao, et al. (2022) [28]
Exon 2NM_020989.4:c.110G>Cp.Arg37Promissense1st Greek keyCC NFSZhang et al. (2019) [29]
Exon 2NM_020989.4:c.134T>Cp.Leu45Promissense2nd Greek keyNon-syndromic CCGillespie et al. (2014) [10]; Fu et al. (2021) [30]
Exon 2NM_020989.4:c.136T>Gp.Tyr46Aspmissense2nd Greek keyNuclear CCZhong et al. (2017) [31]; Fu et al. (2021) [30]
Exon 2NM_020989.4:c.143G>Ap.Arg48Hismissense2nd Greek keyNuclear pulverulent CC; unilateral CC + optic disc colobomaKumar et al. (2011) [32]; Sun et al. (2017) [33]
Exon 2NM_020989.4: c.164A>Gp.Gln55Argmissense2nd Greek keyCC NFSKarahan et al. (2021) [34]
Exon 2NM_020989.4:c.173T>Cp.Leu58Promissense2nd Greek keyCC NFSMoon et al. (2021) [35]
Exon 2NM_020989.4:c.233C>Tp.Ser78Phemissense2nd Greek keyCC + microcorneaLi et al. (2018) [36]
Exon 3NM_020989.4:c.280G>Ap.Glu94Lysmissense3rd Greek keyUnilateral total CCLi et al. (2016) [37]
Exon 3NM_020989.4:c.385G>Tp.Gly129Cysmissense4th Greek keyCC NFSLi et al. (2012) [38]; Xi et al. (2015) [39]
Exon 3NM_020989.4:c.497C>Tp.Ser166Phemissense4th Greek keyNuclear CC + microphthalmosProkudin et al. (2014) [40]; Zhong et al. (2017) [31]; Fan et al. (2020) [41]; Ma et al. (2016) [42]
Exon 3NM_020989.4:c.502C>Tp.Arg168Trpmissense4th Greek keyLamellar/nuclear CC + peripupillary iris atrophy, nystagmus,Santhiya et al. (2022) [43]; Gonzaez-Huerta et al. (2007) [44]; Devi et al. (2008) [45]
Exon 3NM_020989.4:c.327C>Ap.Cys109Ternonsense3rd Greek keyNuclear CCYao et al. (2008) [46]
Exon 3NM_020989.4:c.337C>Tp.Gln113Ternonsense3rd Greek keyNuclear CCLi et al. (2016) [37]
Exon 3NM_020989.4:c.382G>Tp.Glu128Ternonsense3rd Greek keyNuclear CCKandaswamy et al. (2020) [47]
Exon 3NM_020989.4:c.402C>Gp.Tyr134Ternonsense4th Greek keyCC NFSGillespie et al. (2014) [10]
Exon 3NM_020989.4:c.403G>Tp.Glu135Ternonsense4th Greek keyCC + microcorneaPatel et al. (2017) [48]
Exon 3NM_020989.4:c.417C>Gp.Tyr139Ternonsense4th Greek keyTotal CC + microphthalmosReis et al. (2013) [49]
Exon 3NM_020989.4:c.417C>Ap.Tyr139Ternonsense4th Greek keyNuclear CC + microcorneaZhong et al. (2017) [31]
Exon 3NM_020989.4:c.432C>Gp.Tyr144Ternonsense4th Greek keyNuclear CCZhong et al. (2017) [31]; Sun et al. (2017) [33]; Taylan Sekeroglu et al. (2020) [50]
Exon 3NM_020989.4:c.470G>Ap.Trp157Ternonsense4th Greek keyNuclear CC + microcorneaZhang et al. (2009) [51]; Kessel et al. (2021) [52]
Exon 3NM_020989.4:c.471G>Ap.Trp157Ternonsense4th Greek keyNuclear CC + microcorneaGuo et al. (2012) [53]
Exon 3NM_020989.4:c.505A>Tp.Arg169Ternonsense4th Greek keyNuclear CCZhong et al. (2017) [31]
Intron 1NM_020989.4:c.10-1G>A splicing CC NFSZhuang et al. (2019) [54]
Exon 2NM_020989.4:c.119_123dupGCGGCp.Cys42AlafsTer63frameshift2nd Greek keyZonular pulverulent CCRen et al. (2000) [55]
Exon 2NM_020989.4:c.124delTp.Cys42AlafsTer61frameshift2nd Greek keyTotal CC ± microphthalmosKondo et al. (2013) [56]
Exon 2NM_020989.4:c.130delAp.Met44CysfsTer59frameshift2nd Greek keyTotal CC + microcorneaSun et al. (2017) [33]
Exon 2NM_020989.4:c.157_161dup-GCGGCp.Gln55ValfsTer50frameshift2nd Greek keyCC NFSReis et al. (2013) [49]
Exon 2NM_020989.4:c.179delGp.Arg60GlnfsTer43frameshift2nd Greek keyNuclear CCBerry et al. (2020) [26]
Exon 2NM_020989.4:c.192delCp.Asp65ThrfsTer38frameshift2nd Greek keyCC NFSFan et al. (2020) [41]
Exon 2NM_020989.4:c.193delGp.Asp65ThrfsTer38frameshift2nd Greek keyNuclear CCZhong et al. (2017) [31]
Exon 3NM_020989.4:c.320_321del-AAp.Glu107GlyfsTer56frameshift3rd Greek keyTotal CCRechsteiner et al. (2021) [9]
Exon 3NM_020989.4:c.328_329del-CCinsTp.Pro110SerfsTer37frameshift3rd Greek keyLamellar CCMa et al. (2016) [42]
Exon 3NM_020989.4:c.386_389dup-GCTGp.Cys130TrpfsTer35frameshift4th Greek keyNuclear CC ± microphthalmosZhou et al. (2022) [57]
Exon 3NM_020989.4:c.394delGp.Val132SerfsTer15frameshift4th Greek keyTotal CC + microphthalmosPeng et al. (2022) [13]
Exon 3NM_020989.4:c.423delGp.Arg142GlyfsTer5frameshift4th Greek keyNuclear CCZhong et al. (2017) [31]
Exon 3NM_020989.4:c.423dupGp.Arg142AlafsTer22frameshift4th Greek keyNuclear CCZhong et al. (2017) [31]
Exon 3NM_020989.4:c.425_432dupp.Leu145GlyfsTer5frameshift4th Greek keyNuclear CC + microphthalmos + iris malformationsFernández-Alcalde et al. (2021) [58]
Exon 3NM_020989.4:c.438delGp.Arg147GlyfsTer32frameshift4th Greek keyNuclear CCFernandez-Alcade et al. (2021) [58]
Acronyms: CC, congenital cataract; NFS, not further specified.
Table 3. Previously described disease-causing point mutations in conserved Tryptophans of crystallins.
Table 3. Previously described disease-causing point mutations in conserved Tryptophans of crystallins.
GeneExoncDNAAmino Acid ChangeCoding
Effect
Protein DomainPhenotypeReference
CRYGDExon 2NM_006891.4:c.127T>Cp.Trp43Argmissense2nd Greek KeyNuclear CCWang et al. (2011) [59]; Ji et al. (2013) [60]
CRYBB2Exon 4NM_000496.3:c.177G>Cp.Trp59Argmissense2nd Greek KeyTotal CCSanthiya et al. (2010) [63]; Zhao et al. (2017) [17]
CRYBB2Exon 6NM_000496.3:c.451T>Cp.Trp151Argmissense4th Greek keyProgressive CCXu et al. (2021) [64]
CRYBB2Exon 6NM_000496.3:c.453G>Cp.Trp151Cysmissense4th Greek keyProgressive membranous CCChen et al. (2013) [65]; Zhao et al. (2017) [17]
CRYBB2Exon 6NM_000496.3:c.453G>Tp.Trp151Cysmissense4th Greek keyNuclear CCSanthiya et al. (2004) [66]
Acronyms: CC, congenital cataract.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Delas, F.; Koller, S.; Feil, S.; Dacheva, I.; Gerth-Kahlert, C.; Berger, W. Novel CRYGC Mutation in Conserved Ultraviolet-Protective Tryptophan (p.Trp131Arg) Is Linked to Autosomal Dominant Congenital Cataract. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16594. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242316594

AMA Style

Delas F, Koller S, Feil S, Dacheva I, Gerth-Kahlert C, Berger W. Novel CRYGC Mutation in Conserved Ultraviolet-Protective Tryptophan (p.Trp131Arg) Is Linked to Autosomal Dominant Congenital Cataract. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(23):16594. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242316594

Chicago/Turabian Style

Delas, Flora, Samuel Koller, Silke Feil, Ivanka Dacheva, Christina Gerth-Kahlert, and Wolfgang Berger. 2023. "Novel CRYGC Mutation in Conserved Ultraviolet-Protective Tryptophan (p.Trp131Arg) Is Linked to Autosomal Dominant Congenital Cataract" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 23: 16594. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242316594

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop