Next Article in Journal
Dissecting the Meiotic Recombination Patterns in a Brassica napus Double Haploid Population Using 60K SNP Array
Next Article in Special Issue
Multiple Dosing and Preactivation of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Enhance Efficacy in Established Pneumonia Induced by Antimicrobial-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Rodents
Previous Article in Journal
Schmidtea mediterranea as a Model Organism to Study the Molecular Background of Human Motile Ciliopathies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Opposing MMP-9 Expression in Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Head and Neck Tumor Cells after Direct 2D and 3D Co-Culture
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 5
10.3390/ijms24054464
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Acquired Aplastic Anemia: The Spectrum from Basic to Clinical Utility

by
Xing-An Wang
1,
Ju-Pi Li
1,2,
Kang-Hsi Wu
1,2,
Shun-Fa Yang
3,4 and
Yu-Hua Chao
1,2,5,*
1
Department of Pediatrics, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 402, Taiwan
2
School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
3
Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
4
Department of Medical Research, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 402, Taiwan
5
Department of Clinical Pathology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 402, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(5), 4464; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24054464
Submission received: 29 January 2023 / Revised: 17 February 2023 / Accepted: 21 February 2023 / Published: 24 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mesenchymal Stromal Cells’ Involvement in Human Diseases and Their Treatment)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Aplastic anemia (AA), a rare but potentially life-threatening disease, is a paradigm of bone marrow failure syndromes characterized by pancytopenia in the peripheral blood and hypocellularity in the bone marrow. The pathophysiology of acquired idiopathic AA is quite complex. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), an important component of the bone marrow, are crucial in providing the specialized microenvironment for hematopoiesis. MSC dysfunction may result in an insufficient bone marrow and may be associated with the development of AA. In this comprehensive review, we summarized the current understanding about the involvement of MSCs in the pathogenesis of acquired idiopathic AA, along with the clinical application of MSCs for patients with the disease. The pathophysiology of AA, the major properties of MSCs, and results of MSC therapy in preclinical animal models of AA are also described. Several important issues regarding the clinical use of MSCs are discussed finally. With evolving knowledge from basic studies and clinical applications, we anticipate that more patients with the disease can benefit from the therapeutic effects of MSCs in the near future.

1. Introduction

Aplastic anemia (AA) is a paradigm of bone marrow failure syndromes characterized by peripheral pancytopenia and bone marrow hypoplasia. The first formal description dates back to 1888 when Paul Ehrlich reported a young pregnant women with profound anemia, bleeding, high fever, and eventually death [1]. AA can be graded by the severity of cytopenias in the peripheral blood [2]. The criteria of severe aplastic anemia (SAA) are bone marrow hypocellularity of less than 25% and at least two of following: absolute neutrophil count < 0.5 × 109/L, platelet count < 20 × 109/L, and reticulocyte count < 20 × 109/L. In very severe AA, there is extreme neutropenia of less than 0.2 × 109/L. In nonsevere AA, hypocellular bone marrow is noted but peripheral blood values do not meet the criteria of SAA. SAA is potentially life-threatening if dedicated treatment is not implemented.
Acquired AA can affect patients of all ages, with an annual incidence of about 2 per million population [3]. A variety of insults, such as drugs, chemicals or irradiation, and infections, can lead to the impairment of hematopoiesis, which is the main feature of AA. A specific cause cannot be identified in a large proportion of patients and is termed “idiopathic AA”. Historically, immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have been the mainstay of treatment for these patients. Having unique properties, the clinical application of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is evolving rapidly in the recent decade for many human diseases, including AA.
Here, we present a comprehensive review of current concepts regarding the insufficiency of MSCs in acquired idiopathic AA and the clinical use of MSCs in patients with the disease. We also summarized the pathophysiology of AA, the properties of MSCs, and preclinical results of MSC therapy in animal models of AA. In view of different entities, a discussion about congenital AA with an identified germline mutation is outside the scope of this review.

2. Pathophysiology of Aplastic Anemia

AA is characterized by pancytopenia in the peripheral blood and hypocellularity in the bone marrow. When AA is suspected, a comprehensive evaluation should be performed to exclude other mimicking conditions and search for underlying etiologies. Despite of these efforts, a specific cause cannot be identified in a large proportion of patients and is termed “idiopathic”. The pathogenesis of acquired idiopathic AA is complex, and we summarized the current concepts in the following sections (Figure 1).

2.1. Immune Dysfunction

The immune-mediated destruction of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) is the most widely accepted mechanism of hematopoietic failure in AA. Available evidence suggests the gross homeostatic dysregulation of the T cell repertoire in AA, and T cell attack on marrow cells of AA has been illustrated in vitro and in vivo. It has been demonstrated that the percentage of activated CD8+ cytotoxic T cells is increased in the both bone marrow and peripheral blood of patients with AA. In vitro coculture with CD8+ T cells isolated from patients with AA was found to inhibit colony formation and enhance apoptosis of CD34+ cells isolated from normal individuals [4,5,6], suggesting CD8+ cytotoxic T cell dysfunction in AA. Abnormalities in the number and function of CD4+ T cells have also been documented in AA, with increased T helper (Th)1, Th2, and Th17 cells [7]. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are believed to control autoimmunity by suppressing autoreactive T cells and play an important role in the maintenance of immune homeostasis. A decrease in the number of CD4+ CD25+ FOXP3+ Tregs was found in almost all patients with AA [8], and there was an inverse relationship between the numbers of Th17 cells and Tregs in the peripheral blood of patients [9]. Meanwhile, hyperactive T cells in AA may release a variety of inflammatory cytokines, such as interferon-γ (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interleukin (IL)-17, thus with elevated concentrations in the serum and bone marrow plasma [10,11,12]. These cytokines were found to confer additional hematopoietic suppression by increasing Fas expression on CD34+ progenitor cells and inducing the programmed cell death of these cells [6]. On the other hand, the effectiveness of IST in the treatment of AA provides compelling clinical evidence for the immune-mediated nature of the disease.

2.2. Deficiencies of HSCs

HSCs are capable of self-renewal and differentiation into various hematopoietic cells and are critical for the maintenance of the hematopoietic system. There is evidence of primary deficiencies, both quantitative and qualitative, in AA HSCs. Patients with AA have decreased numbers of HSCs at diagnosis [13,14], and these cells were found to display poor plating efficiency for colony formation [15,16]. Increased apoptosis of CD34+ cells in both the bone marrow and peripheral blood was observed in patients with AA [17,18]. Some intrinsic abnormalities predispose AA HSCs to apoptosis, resulting in HSC depletion. The upregulated expression of Fas antigen, which is a receptor molecule in the death signaling pathway, was frequently found on CD34+ cells in AA [19]. Abnormal expression of the apoptotic modulators Bcl-2 and Bcl-x was associated with the increased apoptosis of CD34+ cells in AA [20]. In addition, downregulated expression of cell cycle check point genes, such as CDK6, CDK2, MYB, MYC, and FANCG, was found in AA HSCs [21] and may compromise their replicative ability. Meanwhile, about one-third of patients with AA have telomere attrition in their leukocytes [22], and the telomere length at diagnosis correlates with disease severity and clinical outcomes [23,24]. Only a small subset of patients harbors mutations in the telomerase complex genes, such as TERT or TERC [25,26], and the majority of patients do not have these identifiable mutations. Therefore, multiple mechanisms may contribute to telomeric shortening in AA, including increased stem cell turnover, unidentified damage to telomeres, and genetic defects.

2.3. Genetic Susceptibility

Genetic factors play an important role in the pathogenesis of AA. Because patients harboring cytogenetic abnormalities may exhibit distinct pathogenesis and clinical manifestations, these patients should be discussed separately.
Several studies have reported the association between certain human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles and the predisposition of AA. AA is more common in HLA-DR2-positive individuals than in the general population and in particular with the HLA-DRB1*15 allele in Asia. Moreover, DRB1*03, DQB1*0601, and DQB1*0603 were found to be either susceptible or protective alleles [27,28]. Although still being elucidated, HLA allelic variations may contribute to the activation of autoreactive T cells and the protective failure of Tregs.
Recent advances in genomic analysis have revealed the complexity of somatic mutations and clonal hematopoiesis in AA. PIGA mutations were frequently detected in patients with AA at diagnosis but without paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria-related symptoms [29]. About one third of patients have somatic mutations in myeloid cancer candidate genes and in a limited set of genes, such as DNMT3A, ASXL1, and BCOR, and at a lower variant allele frequency [30]. The prevalence of these mutations increases with age, with a lower incidence in pediatric population. Some mutations were related to clinical outcomes; some may have potential to evolve from AA to myelodysplastic syndrome [31].

2.4. Alterations in the Bone Marrow Microenvironment

As known, bone marrow provides the distinct microenvironment for hematopoiesis. The cellular elements, including endosteal, vascular, and perivascular cells, were found to be markedly decreased in the bone marrow of patients with AA [32], implicating the possibility of microenvironmental impairment in the bone marrow. MSCs play a central role in the establishment of the bone marrow niche, and their defects may lead to the development of AA. In the following sections, the characteristics of MSCs and the alterations of bone marrow MSCs in patients with AA are discussed in detail.

3. Mesenchymal Stem Cells

3.1. MSCs in the Bone Marrow

There are three main cellular systems in the bone marrow: hematopoietic, endothelial, and stromal [33]. The stromal cell system, which was first proposed by Owen et al. in 1985 [34], is composed of a variety of nonhematopoietic stromal cells of a mesenchymal origin. MSCs, an important component of the stromal bone marrow, constitute only a small percentage of marrow cells, about one in 3.4 × 104 [35]. Being the so-called stem cells, MSCs within the bone marrow have to maintain a level of self-renewal and give rise to various mesenchyme-lineage cells [36].
In the bone marrow, MSC-derived stromal cells provide the specific microenvironment for hematopoiesis by establishing an appropriate scaffold of extracellular matrix molecules along with a complex network of paracrine factors. MSCs secrete a number of cytokines, which can act not only on hematopoietic cells but also on stromal cells [37]. Numerous growth factors, such as stem cell factor, granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and macrophage colony-stimulating factor, have positive effects on hematopoiesis. MSCs also produce negative regulators of hematopoiesis, such as IL-8, macrophage inflammatory protein-1, and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β). In addition, MSCs involve cell migration and homing to the bone marrow via the expression of adhesion molecules, including integrins, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), and other molecules of the extracellular matrix [38,39]. Given the significant role in the hematopoietic niche, many studies have demonstrated the promotive effects of MSCs on in vitro HSC expansion [40,41,42,43]. In animal models, the infusion of MSCs has been shown to enhance the engraftment of donor HSCs after transplantation [43,44,45].

3.2. Properties of MSCs

According to the consensus statement by the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT), human MSCs are defined by their in vitro growth pattern, the expression of specific surface markers, and the multipotent differentiation potential (Figure 2) [46]. Having a spindle-shaped fibroblastic morphology, MSCs must be plastic-adherent when maintained in standard culture conditions. MSCs must express CD105, CD73, and CD90 and lack expression of CD45, CD34, CD14 or CD11b, CD79α or CD19, and HLA-DR. With a broad differentiation potential, the most unique property to identify MSCs is the capacity for trilineage mesenchymal differentiation, including osteoblasts, adipocytes, and chondroblasts.
MSCs express HLA-class I molecules, but not class II. MSCs do not express costimulatory molecules CD80 (B7-1), CD86 (B7-2), CD40, and CD40 ligand and probably, therefore, do not activate alloreactive T cells [47,48,49]. In vivo, transplanted allogeneic MSCs can be detected in recipients at extended time points, implicating the lack of immune recognition and clearance [50]. In humans, numerous clinical reports have demonstrated that infused mismatched allogeneic MSCs do not trigger vigorous T cell responses in recipients without the risk of transferred cell rejection [51,52,53]. These data offer evidence that MSCs are immunologically inert or potentially tolerogenic, indicating the convenience for their clinical utility.

3.3. Immunomodulation by MSCs

MSCs are able to regulate the activities of immune cells from both innate and adaptive immune systems, but their immunomodulatory capacity is not constitutive. MSCs require “licensing” to gain their immunosuppressive function after stimulation from certain inflammatory cytokines and are therefore chemokine-dependent. IFN-γ is critical for the chemokine induction in MSCs [54,55,56]. However, the optimal induction of immunosuppression requires the concurrent addition of other proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-1α, IL-1β, and IL-17 [55,56,57]. Constitutively, MSCs express low levels of immunomodulatory molecules, including indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), prostaglandin E-2 (PGE-2), TGF-β, and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). These inflammatory cytokines can differentially regulate their expression under inflammatory conditions [58]. Again, IFN-γ in particular plays an important role in regulating MSC immunomodulatory factor expression [58]. On the contrary, immunosuppressive cytokines, such as TGF-β and IL-10, are believed to serve a counterbalancing role by inducing less immunosuppressive MSCs and thus become immune-enhancing. It was observed that TGF-β abolishes the immunosuppressive capacity of MSCs by downregulating the expression of IDO or inducible NO synthase (iNOS) in MSCs [59]. In addition to cytokines, Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling has also been implicated in the licensing of MSCs, and the stimulation of specific TLRs on MSCs may greatly affect their immune-modulating responses. TLR4 priming can induce a proinflammatory signature of MSCs (MSC1 phenotype), which mostly involves inflammatory mediators, such as IL-6, IL-8, and TGF-β. In contrast, TLR3-primed MSCs represent immunosuppressive activities (MSC2 phenotype) and secrete IDO, PGE-2, IL-4, and IL-1RA [60]. These data indicate that the inflammatory status in their microenvironment determines the immunoregulatory fate of MSCs (Figure 3). They are rendered immunosuppressive in the presence of strong inflammation, but week inflammation may cause MSCs to promote immune responses [61].
Having profound immunomodulatory potential, MSCs are receptive to environmental cues and orchestrate the activation, proliferation, and function of immune cells from both innate and adaptive immune systems. Under inflammatory conditions, the immunosuppressive activities of MSCs have been demonstrated to prevent overstimulation of the immune system. Monocyte/macrophage modulation is critical in the MSC-mediated immunomodulatory process. MSCs can inhibit monocyte differentiation from CD34+ HSCs and promote macrophage polarization into an anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype [62,63]. MSCs can affect the differentiation of dendritic cells (DCs) from monocyte precursors [64,65,66]. They could inhibit DC maturation and activation by downregulating the expression of presentation molecules (HLA-DR and CD1a) and costimulatory molecules (CD80 and CD86) in DCs [67,68]. MSCs also exert immunosuppressive effects on mature DCs by inhibiting their migration, compromising their antigen-presenting abilities, repressing their stimulation of lymphocyte proliferation, and decreasing their secretion of inflammatory mediators [69]. Moreover, MSCs can modulate the immune responses of natural killer cells by downregulating their proliferation, cytokine production, and cytolytic activity [70]. MSCs exert immunomodulatory effects on these innate cells mainly through paracrine mechanisms, involving a complicated network of cytokines.
MSCs act on the adaptive immune system in multiple ways, through both direct cell contacts and paracrine effects. MSCs are able to inhibit the proliferation, differentiation, chemotaxis, and immunoglobulin production of B cells [71,72,73,74]. MSCs can also promote the induction of IL-10-producing regulatory B cells, which restrain inflammation by enhancing the conversion of effector CD4+ T cells into Tregs [75]. MSCs influence the behavior of T cells significantly, including proliferation, activation, cytokine secretion, and cytotoxicity [76]. Under inflammatory conditions, MSCs inhibit the expression of Th1 proinflammatory cytokines and enhance Th2 factors, resulting in a more tolerant immune status [50]. MSCs can also regulate the balance between Th1 and Th2 cells through interactions with DCs and natural killer cells [77]. An important mechanism of MSC-mediated immunomodulation of T cells is the generation of Tregs, which are essential for immune homeostasis and the prevention of alloreactive and autoimmune diseases [78]. MSCs can directly induce Treg differentiation through the TLR–Notch pathway and the secretion of TGF-β, IDO, and iNOS [79,80,81]. By increasing IL-10 secretion and decreasing IFN-γ and IL-17 production, MSCs can also promote Treg differentiation from CD4+ T cells and suppress Th1 and Th17 differentiation [82]. MSCs play a role in modulating the balance between Tregs and Th17 cells, and the Treg/Th17 ratio is implicated in shaping the outcome of immune responses (immunosuppression versus inflammation) [83,84]. Due to their great immunomodulatory functions, MSC therapy has been used in numerous immune- or inflammation-associated disorders in humans.

3.4. MSCs from Various Origins

MSCs are derived from mesodermal progenitor cells, and they were firstly identified in the bone marrow [85]. In addition to bone marrow, MSCs can also be isolated from a broad spectrum of tissues, including adult tissues (peripheral blood, fat, and dental pulp) and fetal tissues (umbilical cord, cord blood, placenta, amniotic membrane, and amniotic fluid). The frequency of MSCs in different tissues varies greatly, and their ontological origin also has considerable influence on their performance. The umbilical cord is much richer in MSCs than cord blood [86]; adult bone marrow is a reliable source, but peripheral blood is not [35]. There are several differences between fetal-type MSCs and adult-type MSCs. Fetal-type MSCs appear to have greater expansion capacity, which may be due to their longer telomeres, greater telomerase activity, and higher expression of telomerase reverse transcriptase [87,88,89]. Fetal-type MSCs are less lineage-committed and display lower levels of HLA-class I [90]. Fetal-type MSCs and adult-type MSCs may express different cytokine profiles, immunomodulatory properties, and differentiation potential [88,89,90,91,92].

4. Alterations to MSCs in AA

4.1. Hematopoietic Support

The regulation of hematopoiesis depends on the interaction between HSCs and various cells within the bone marrow niche. Several studies have demonstrated the involvement of MSCs in the functional restriction of HSCs in AA. Using a long-term culture system, bone marrow stromal cells of patients with AA were found to be insufficient to maintain normal HSCs and failed in confluent growth [93,94]. When cocultured with AA MSCs, the proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and the colony-forming capacity of CD34+ cells were significantly reduced [95,96]. These data implicated the insufficiency of AA MSCs in hematopoietic support. Downregulated expression of VCAM-1 in AA MSCs was proposed as being associated with the impairment of in vitro growth support and in vivo engraftment of CD34+ cells [97]. However, multiple intrinsic defects in the bone marrow MSCs of patients with AA may exist.

4.2. Proliferative Potential

Impaired proliferative potential is the hallmark of MSCs in AA. Using population doubling as the indicator, we firstly reported that AA MSCs had a worse average population doubling at each passage and a smaller cumulative population doubling from passage 4 to 6 [98]. We observed that three of five AA MSC cultures stopped proliferating at passage 5, implicating the possibility of early senescence in AA MSCs [95]. We further determined the distribution of cultured cells in different cell cycle phases by flow cytometry and found a high percentage of cells in the abnormal sub-G1 phase in AA MSCs [95]. Our data suggested that an increased apoptotic rate of AA MSCs may contribute to their poor proliferative capacity and early senescence. Our findings were confirmed by numerous studies thereafter [96,99,100,101,102,103]. The worse proliferative potential of AA MSCs was documented based on different parameters, including population doublings [96,99,100], a CCK-8 assay [100,101], growth curves [102], and colony-forming potential [103]. Higher rates of apoptotic cells in AA MSCs were measured via cell cycle analysis [100] and an annexin V-affinity assay [101,103]. AA MSCs were found to be prone to senescence, shown by a higher proportion of β-galactosidase-stained cells [100] and failure to passage [102].

4.3. Surface Marker Expression

Phenotypic characterization is an important ISCT criterion to define MSCs, as shown in Figure 2 [46]. Flow cytometric analysis has been used to examine the alteration in surface marker expression in AA MSCs. The study by Bueno et al. was the only one that fully complied with all the marker criteria established by the ISCT [104], and most studies used six to eight markers as the indicator. Consistent results showed that no difference was noted in the expression of any single surface marker between MSCs derived from patients with AA and controls [105].

4.4. Differentiation Capacity

The final criterion of the ISCT for the definition of MSCs is their in vitro trilineage mesenchymal differentiation capacity (Figure 2) [46]. We firstly reported lower osteogenic and adipogenic capacities of AA MSCs following differentiation induction [98]. Thereafter, a variety of qualitative and quantitative modalities was used to assess alterations to AA MSCs in differentiation tendencies towards osteoblasts, adipocytes, and chondroblasts, including staining methods, RT-qPCR, and Western blot analysis. Lower osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation propensities of AA MSCs were confirmed in most studies. However, there was an apparent discrepancy in the results of adipogenesis in AA MSCs, which included increased adipogenic differentiation potency in some studies and decreased in others [105]. The discrepancy can be explained by the complex pathogenesis of idiopathic AA and heterogeneous study populations. Nevertheless, alterations in the differentiation potential of AA MSCs may exist.

4.5. Immunomodulation

Immune-mediated HSC destruction is an important pathogenic mechanism of idiopathic AA, and MSCs have great immunomodulatory functions. The dysregulation of immune cells from MSCs may impact immune homeostasis in the bone marrow microenvironment. Our previous study demonstrated aberrant cytokine profiles in the conditioned medium of AA MSCs with increased concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, IFN-γ, and TNF-α, suggesting the association between aberrant paracrine factors secreted by MSCs and the hyperinflammatory marrow niche in AA [95]. Bacigulupo et al. observed deficiency in the ability of AA MSCs to downregulate T cell priming, proliferation, and cytokine release [106]. Hu et al. demonstrated impaired inhibition of AA MSCs based on the activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and differentiation towards Th1 and Th17 cells [100]. Li et al. found that AA MSCs were reduced in suppressing the proliferation and clonogenic potential of CD4+ T cells and the production of IFN-γ and TNF-α by CD4+ T cells [107]. We recently examined the influence of AA MSCs on the differentiation of CD4+ T cells into CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Tregs under Treg polarization conditions. AA MSCs showed promotive effects on Treg differentiation, but there were inconsistent changes based on TGF-β and IL-1β levels in the supernatant, implying that a large number of dysfunctional Tregs was produced when CD4+ T cells were cocultured with AA MSCs during differentiation [108]. Collectively, these data provide evidence for the disordered immunomodulatory function of MSCs in AA.

4.6. Gene Expression

Consistent with the anomalous biological performance of bone marrow MSCs in AA, differential gene expression profiles were reported in the literature. Using microarray analysis, we found two different gene expression patterns of MSCs in children with AA, suggesting the heterogeneity of idiopathic AA. Fourteen genes associated with DNA synthesis and growth factors, including POLE2, HFG, KIF20A, TK1, IL18R1, KITLG, FGF18, RRM2, TTK, CXCL12, DLG7, TOP2A, NUF2, and TYMS, were markedly downregulated in AA MSCs [109]. Li et al. performed a comprehensive analysis and confirmed the consistency between the abnormal biological features and the alteration of gene expression profiles in AA MSCs. They observed decreased expression in a number of genes implicated in the cell cycle, cell division, proliferation, chemotaxis, and hematopoietic cell lineage in AA MSCs. Conversely, the expression of genes related to apoptosis, adipogenesis, and the immune response was increased in AA MSCs [103]. With the advance in experimental tools, Hue et al. documented the differential gene expression pattern of AA MSCs using genome-wide RNA sequencing. They found that the differentially expressed genes were principally associated with immunoregulation, cell cycle, and cell division [100].
Aside from the global view of gene expression profiles, there were several reports about the differential expression of an individual gene, which involved one or more defective properties of MSCs in AA. Regarding the contribution of MSCs to angiogenesis, downregulated expression of VCAM-1 and ANG-1 genes was noted in AA MSCs [97,110]. Jiang et al. found downregulated FGF2 expression in AA MSCs, suggesting their compromised ability of self-renewal and impaired support of HSCs [102]. As an important molecule for the maintenance of HSCs in the bone marrow, decreased CXCL12 expression in AA MSCs was found in our previous study, and the knockdown of CXCL12 compelled control MSCs to behave like AA MSCs [109]. A number of genes was reported to contribute to the alteration in the differentiation potential of AA MSCs, including CBF-α1, RUNX2, and BGLAP in osteogenesis, SOX9 and ACAN in chondrogenesis, and PPAR-γ, ADIPOQ, and FABP4 in adipogenesis [105].

5. MSC Therapy in Animal Models of AA

In view of the promotive effects of MSCs on hematopoiesis, various murine models of AA have been used to examine the efficacy of MSC therapy in the context of AA (Table 1). Several attempts were used to induce hypocellular bone marrow in animals, including the administration of toxic or chemical agents, irradiation, and lymph node infusion, but none represented the exact etiology of human idiopathic AA. Although not perfect, lymph node cell infusion combined with irradiation may be superior to irradiation alone to mimic AA in humans because immune-mediated HSC destruction is an important mechanism. The source of MSCs was quite different among studies, being autologous, allogenic, or even xenogeneic. In addition, the dosage of MSCs and time points of MSC administration were variable. Nevertheless, MSC therapy could lead to longer survival, better hematopoietic reconstitution, and faster recovery of peripheral blood cells in most studies [111,112,113,114,115,116,117].

6. Clinical Application of MSCs in AA

6.1. MSC Therapy in Human Diseases

With the growing biologic interest in MSCs, the clinical application of MSCs has been evolving rapidly in the recent decade. More than 1000 clinical trials based on the use of MSCs were implemented to treat various pathologies, according to the US National Institute of Health-Clinical Trial Database (http://clinicaltrials.gov, accessed on 16 February 2022). Several biological properties of MSCs contribute to their therapeutic effects in cell therapy, such as immunomodulation, tissue repair/regeneration, angiogenesis, and antiapoptotic activity [118]. As expected, there are many reports in the literature regarding outcomes of MSC therapy for various human diseases [52,119]. Presumably, diseases with optimal efficacy fall into two main categories. One is associated with immune dysregulation, such as autoimmune diseases (systemic lupus erythematosus, type 1 diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis), inflammatory diseases (Crohn’s disease, acute respiratory distress syndrome), and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic transplantation. The other regards tissue regeneration, such as traumatic injury (spinal cord injury, cerebral infarction, ischemic heart disease, wound repair), degenerative diseases (osteoarthritis, liver cirrhosis), and bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

6.2. Current Treatment for Patients with AA

For patients with idiopathic SAA, allogeneic HSCT or IST should be used as the first-line therapy. The choice is determined by numerous factors, such as severity of the disease, age of the patient, donor availability, and available medical facility [120]. For pediatric and young adult patients with newly diagnosed SAA, allogeneic HSCT should be pursued when an HLA-identical sibling donor is available. IST with antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporine is the most common alternative frontline therapy for older adult patients and those without a matched sibling donor.
The major advantages of HSCT over IST in SAA are the significant reduction in the risk of relapse and the abrogation of the risk for clonal evolution [121]. However, the risk of graft failure and GVHD after HSCT remains the main challenges in the context of SAA. Graft failure was noted in 11–32% of patients with SAA receiving bone marrow transplantation, and acute severe GVHD and symptomatic chronic GVHD occurred in 11–40% and 21–32%, respectively [122]. Moreover, HSCT using grafts from donors other than HLA-identical siblings, such as matched unrelated and haploidentical donors, offers an option for those who have failed previous IST and lack a matched sibling donor. However, the risk of graft failure and GVHD may significantly increase. Novel strategies are needed to improve the transplant-related mortality and morbidity.
Chemotherapy and radiotherapy prior to HSCT cause bone marrow stromal damage, which may be associated with engraftment delay. GVHD is a paradigm of immune dysfunction. As mentioned above, MSCs can differentiate into various mesenchyme-lineage cells and produce a complex network of paracrine factors [37]. Along with their great immunomodulatory function, MSCs are crucial for maintaining immune homeostasis and repairing tissue damage in the bone marrow. A large body of evidence indicated that MSCs are efficient in the promotion of engraftment, the prevention and treatment of graft failure, and the management of GVHD in HSCT [123]. Furthermore, multiple MSC alterations were found in patients with AA, and these may contribute to bone marrow insufficiency in AA. Taken together, MSC therapy is rational in the context of AA.
With the promising results of MSC therapy using preclinical animal models of AA, MSC transplantation alone or in combination with allogeneic HSCs was performed for patients with AA. The safety and efficacy of MSC therapy were evaluated. As of February 2023, there were nine clinical trials registered on the US National Institute of Health-Clinical Trial Database (http://clinicaltrials.gov, accessed on 16 February 2022) when searching for “MSCs and AA”. Meanwhile, there are many reports in the literature regarding the use of MSCs in AA. In the next paragraphs, the available data on the therapeutic role of allogeneic MSCs for patients with AA are discussed.

6.2.1. MSC Infusion

Five studies regarding allogeneic MSC transplantation for patients with refractory or relapsed AA were reported in the literature (Table 2) [124,125,126,127,128]. Most patients received concomitant immunosuppressants, such as antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporine. Four of the five studies included only a small number of patients. Only one study compared the combination of MSC infusions and IST with IST alone, but the number of patients was quite small [128]. Despite some insufficiency in the quality, all of these reports demonstrated the safety of MSC infusions. However, there were no significant effects on hematopoiesis. Clinical hematologic responses were observed in only a small proportion of patients and were mainly partial. Accordingly, MSC infusions, even multiple times, may not be enough to reconstitute the hematopoiesis in patients with AA.

6.2.2. MSC and HSC Co-Transplantation

In view of the unsatisfactory outcomes of MSC infusion, the co-transplantation of MSCs during HSCT may be a better option for patients with SAA because allogeneic HSCs can result in the direct reconstruction of hematopoiesis in the bone marrow. In addition, MSCs have the potential to overcome the obstacles in HSCT, for example, graft failure and GVHD. We and Jaganathan et al. firstly reported the promotive effects of MSC infusion on hematopoietic engraftment during HSCT in two children and one adult with refractory SAA, respectively [129,130]. No acute or chronic GVHD was found in our patients. Since then, several studies that enrolled a higher number of patients with SAA receiving MSC and HSC co-transplantation were reported (Table 3) [131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138]. Different treatment protocols were used in different studies, and only one retrospective study had a control group [138]. Nevertheless, the great benefit of MSC co-transplantation during HSCT was observed based on enhancing hematopoietic reconstitution, preventing graft rejection, ameliorating GVHD, and improving overall survival in patients with SAA. The efficacy of MSCs appears to be maintained across different patient populations and treatment protocols: the source and cell number of MSCs, the frequency and time point of MSC administration, and the donor and source of HSCs. The safety of MSC co-transplantation was also evaluated, and no immediate infusion or late MSC-associated toxicities were reported. Accordingly, co-transplantation of MSCs during allogeneic HSCT may be superior to traditional HSCT for patients with SAA. Further prospective studies with a larger cohort of patients are needed.

6.3. Challenges and Road Ahead

Current clinical results showed the beneficial effects of MSC co-transplantation during HSCT in patients with SAA. Some issues related to the application of MSCs should be further explored, and consensus and guidelines are required to maximize their therapeutic efficacy. Because the number of MSCs obtained from the donor is not enough, passaged cells are used widely in clinical practice. However, the in vitro expansion of MSCs may lead to genetic instability and changes in cell behavior. For example, MSCs may gradually lose their properties of early progenitor cells with passaging, and transforming events may occur [46]. Therefore, conditions for MSC culture should be guaranteed, and it is better to use cells without extensive population doublings. Generally, MSCs within six passages are used in humans [139].
When co-transplanted during HSCT for patients with SAA, MSCs were infused for a single time or multiple times, and the cell doses were 0.5–10 × 106/kg per injection. A single injection with a dose of around 1 × 106/kg before HSC infusion was used most frequently (Table 3). Typically, MSCs are administrated intravenously at doses in 1–2 × 106/kg for most clinical conditions [52]. However, it remains to be verified whether this is the optimal strategy. Tracking studies using labeled MSCs demonstrated that most MSCs were cleared from the body within 24–48 h after infusion. Acting as a hit-and-run attack, multiple injections may be needed in some difficult situations, such as graft rejection and severe GVHD. The injection interval ranged from 3 days to 1 week in most clinical conditions, but the optimal frequency and interval in SAA should be further determined.
The source of MSCs is another important issue. MSCs can be obtained from many kinds of tissues, and their ontological origins may greatly impact their properties and their performance in clinical utility. As we know now, no study has compared head-to-head clinical outcomes of MSC therapy with different origins in a single human disease. Fetal-type MSCs are less lineage-committed and have greater expansion capacity [140]. In contrast, bone marrow MSCs exhibit accelerated senescence significantly with age. In addition, umbilical cords are rich in MSCs, and no invasive procedure is needed to obtain MSCs from umbilical cords. Moreover, umbilical cord-derived MSC products from MSC banks are off-the-shelf, with well-performed characterization and the confirmation of sterility. With the great advantage of availability, umbilical cord-derived MSCs have been used prevalently in many human diseases, including SAA. However, the exact discrepancy in the clinical performance of MSCs from different sources should be evaluated.
Many studies reported that no significant side effects were noted in the clinical use of MSCs. However, MSC administration is not completely free of risks and most patients were monitored only for a short period of time. While a post-infusion febrile reaction was reported as the most frequent side effect associated with the use of MSCs, other short-term adverse events, such as allergic reactions, secondary infections, viral reactivations, and thromboembolic events, should be closely monitored and promptly managed. On the other hand, cryopreserved MSC products usually contain dimethyl sulfoxide, which may cause acute infusion toxicities, such as headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, and allergic reactions. Premedication with antihistamines can alleviate these symptoms. Meanwhile, future studies are needed to assess possible long-term complications, such as ectopic tissue formation and tumorigenesis.

7. Conclusions

Acquired idiopathic AA is a rare but life-threatening bone marrow failure syndrome, with a complex pathophysiology. In this review article, we summarized what is known today regarding the association between MSCs in the pathogenesis of the disease and the use of MSCs for patients with AA (Figure 4). On the whole, MSCs are promising for the management of AA, especially when co-transplanted during HSCT. Meanwhile, there are several important issues regarding their utility in AA and other clinical situations. A variety of challenges still lay ahead! With deeper knowledge from basic studies and clinical applications, we anticipate that more patients can benefit from the therapeutic effects of MSCs, including those with AA. While no severe short-term adverse effects have been observed, long-term safety still needs to be assessed in future studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.-H.W. and Y.-H.C.; writing-original draft, X.-A.W. and J.-P.L.; writing-review and editing, S.-F.Y.; supervision, Y.-H.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 110-2314-B-040-012) and the Chung Shan Medical University Hospital (CSH-2023-C-018).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ehrlich, P. Ueber einem Fall von Anämie mit Bemerkungen über regenerative Veränderungen des Knochenmarks. Charite’-Annalen 1888, 13, 300–309. [Google Scholar]
  2. Guinan, E.C. Diagnosis and management of aplastic anemia. Hematology 2011, 2011, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Young, N.S.; Kaufman, D.W. The epidemiology of acquired aplastic anemia. Haematologica 2008, 93, 489–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Xing, L.; Liu, C.; Fu, R.; Wang, H.; Wang, J.; Liu, X.; Feng, L.; Li, L.; Liu, H.; Wang, H.; et al. CD8+HLA-DR+ T cells are increased in patients with severe aplastic anemia. Mol. Med. Rep. 2014, 10, 1252–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Nakao, S.; Takami, A.; Takamatsu, H.; Zeng, W.; Sugimori, N.; Yamazaki, H.; Miura, Y.; Ueda, M.; Shiobara, S.; Yoshioka, T.; et al. Isolation of a T-cell clone showing HLA-DRB1 0405-restricted cytotoxicity for hematopoietic cells in a patient with aplastic anemia. Blood 1997, 89, 3691–3699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Maciejewski, J.; Selleri, C.; Anderson, S.; Young, N.S. Fas antigen expression on CD34+ human marrow cells is induced by interferon gamma and tumor necrosis factor alpha and potentiates cytokine-mediated hematopoietic suppression in vitro. Blood 1995, 85, 3183–3190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kordasti, S.; Marsh, J.; Al-Khan, S.; Jiang, J.; Smith, A.; Mohamedali, A.; Abellan, P.P.; Veen, C.; Costantini, B.; Kulasekararaj, A.G.; et al. Functional characterization of CD4+ T cells in aplastic anemia. Blood 2012, 1, 2033–2043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Solomou, E.E.; Rezvani, K.; Mielke, S.; Malide, D.; Keyvanfar, K.; Visconte, V.; Kajigaya, S.; Barrett, A.J.; Young, N.S. Deficient CD4+ CD25+ FOXP3+ T regulatory cells in acquired aplastic anemia. Blood 2007, 110, 1603–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. de Latour, R.P.; Visconte, V.; Takaku, T.; Wu, C.; Erie, A.J.; Sarcon, A.K.; Desierto, M.J.; Scheinberg, P.; Keyvanfar, K.; Nunez, O.; et al. Th17 immune responses contribute to the pathophysiology of aplastic anemia. Blood 2010, 116, 4175–4184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Shi, J.; Ge, M.; Li, X.; Shao, Y.; Yao, J.; Zheng, Y. Increased bone marrow (BM) plasma level of soluble CD30 and correlations with BM plasma level of interferon (IFN)-gamma, CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio and disease severity in aplastic anemia. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e110787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sloand, E.; Kim, S.; Maciejewski, J.P.; Tisdale, J.; Follmann, D.; Young, N.S. Intracellular interferon-gamma in circulating and marrow T cells detected by flow cytometry and the response to immunosuppressive therapy in patients with aplastic anemia. Blood 2002, 100, 1185–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Dubey, S.; Shukla, P.; Nityanand, S. Expression of interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in bone marrow T cells and their levels in bone marrow plasma in patients with aplastic anemia. Ann. Hematol. 2005, 84, 572–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Marsh, J.C.; Chang, J.; Testa, N.G.; Hows, J.M.; Dexter, T.M. The hematopoietic defect in aplastic anemia assessed by long-term marrow culture. Blood 1990, 76, 1748–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Manz, C.Y.; Nissen, C.; Wodnar-Filipowicz, A. Deficiency of CD34+ c-kit+ and CD34+38- hematopoietic precursors in aplastic anemia after immunosuppressive treatment. Am. J. Hematol. 1996, 52, 264–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Maciejewski, J.P.; Selleri, C.; Sato, T.; Anderson, S.; Young, N.S. A severe and consistent deficit in marrow and circulating primitive hematopoietic cells (long-term culture-initiating cells) in acquired aplastic anemia. Blood 1996, 88, 1983–1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Rizzo, S.; Scopes, J.; Elebute, M.O.; Papadaki, H.A.; Gordon-Smith, E.C.; Gibson, F.M. Stem cell defect in aplastic anemia: Reduced long term culture-initiating cells (LTC-IC) in CD34+ cells isolated from aplastic anemia patient bone marrow. Hematol. J. 2002, 3, 230–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Timeus, F.; Crescenzio, N.; Doria, A.; Foglia, L.; Linari, A.; Giaccone, M.; Pastore, G.; di Montezemolo, L.C.; Ramenghi, U.; Saracco, P. Flow cytometric evaluation of circulating CD34+ cell counts and apoptotic rate in children with acquired aplastic anemia and myelodysplasia. Exp. Hematol. 2005, 33, 597–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Callera, F.; Falcao, R.P. Increased apoptotic cells in bone marrow biopsies from patients with aplastic anaemia. Br. J. Haematol. 1997, 98, 18–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Maciejewski, J.P.; Selleri, C.; Sato, T.; Anderson, S.; Young, N.S. Increased expression of Fas antigen on bone marrow CD34+ cells of patients with aplastic anaemia. Br. J. Haematol. 1995, 91, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ismail, M.; Gibson, F.M.; Gordon-Smith, E.C.; Rutherford, T.R. Bcl-2 and Bcl-x expression in the CD34+ cells of aplastic anaemia patients: Relationship with increased apoptosis and upregulation of Fas antigen. Br. J. Haematol. 2001, 113, 706–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zeng, W.; Chen, G.; Kajigaya, S.; Nunez, O.; Charrow, A.; Billings, E.M.; Young, N.S. Gene expression profiling in CD34 cells to identify differences between aplastic anemia patients and healthy volunteers. Blood 2004, 103, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Brummendorf, T.H.; Maciejewski, J.P.; Mak, J.; Young, N.S.; Lansdorp, P.M. Telomere length in leukocyte subpopulations of patients with aplastic anemia. Blood 2001, 97, 895–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Scheinberg, P.; Cooper, J.N.; Sloand, E.M.; Wu, C.O.; Calado, R.T.; Young, N.S. Association of telomere length of peripheral blood leukocytes with hematopoietic relapse, malignant transformation, and survival in severe aplastic anemia. JAMA 2010, 304, 1358–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Sakaguchi, H.; Nishio, N.; Hama, A.; Kawashima, N.; Wang, X.; Narita, A.; Doisaki, S.; Xu, Y.; Muramatsu, H.; Yoshida, N.; et al. Peripheral blood lymphocyte telomere length as a predictor of response to immunosuppressive therapy in childhood aplastic anemia. Haematologica 2014, 99, 1312–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Yamaguchi, H.; Calado, R.T.; Ly, H.; Kajigaya, S.; Baerlocher, G.M.; Chanock, S.J.; Lansdorp, P.M.; Young, N.S. Mutations in TERT, the gene for telomerase reverse transcriptase, in aplastic anemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 352, 1413–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Yamaguchi, H.; Baerlocher, G.M.; Lansdorp, P.M.; Chanock, S.J.; Nunez, O.; Sloand, E.; Young, N.S. Mutations of the human telomerase RNA gene (TERC) in aplastic anemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood 2003, 102, 916–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Akram, Z.; Ahmed, P.; Kajigaya, S.; Satti, T.M.; Satti, H.S.; Chaudhary, Q.U.N.; Gutierrez-Rodrigues, F.; Ibanez, P.F.; Feng, X.; Mahmood, S.K.; et al. Epidemiological, clinical and genetic characterization of aplastic anemia patients in Pakistan. Ann. Hematol. 2019, 98, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shao, W.; Tian, D.; Liu, C.; Sun, X.; Zhang, X. Aplastic anemia is associated with HLA-DRB1 1501 in northern Han Chinese. Int. J. Hematol. 2000, 71, 350–352. [Google Scholar]
  29. Babushok, D.V.; Perdigones, N.; Perin, J.C.; Olson, T.S.; Ye, W.; Roth, J.J.; Lind, C.; Cattier, C.; Li, Y.; Hartung, H.; et al. Emergence of clonal hematopoiesis in the majority of patients with acquired aplastic anemia. Cancer Genet. 2015, 208, 115–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Yoshizato, T.; Dumitriu, B.; Hosokawa, K.; Makishima, H.; Yoshida, K.; Townsley, D.; Sato-Otsubo, A.; Sato, Y.; Liu, D.; Suzuki, H.; et al. Somatic mutations and clonal hematopoiesis in aplastic anemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 1, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kulasekararaj, A.G.; Jiang, J.; Smith, A.E.; Mohamedali, A.M.; Mian, S.; Gandhi, S.; Gaken, J.; Czepulkowski, B.; Marsh, J.C.; Mufti, G.J. Somatic mutations identify a subgroup of aplastic anemia patients who progress to myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood 2014, 124, 2698–2704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Wu, L.; Mo, W.; Zhang, Y.; Deng, H.; Li, Y.; Zhou, R.; Zhang, L.; Pan, S.; Wang, S. Impairment of hematopoietic stem cell niches in patients with aplastic anemia. Int. J. Hematol. 2015, 102, 645–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Deans, R.J.; Moseley, A.B. Mesenchymal stem cells: Biology and potential clinical uses. Exp. Hematol. 2000, 28, 875–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Owen, M. Lineage of osteogenic cells and their relationship to the stromal system. Bone Miner. Res. 1985, 3, 25. [Google Scholar]
  35. Wexler, S.A.; Donaldson, C.; Denning-Kendall, P.; Rice, C.; Bradley, B.; Hows, J.M. Adult bone marrow is a rich source of human mesenchymal ‘stem’ cells but umbilical cord and mobilized adult blood are not. Br. J. Haematol. 2003, 121, 368–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Pittenger, M.F.; Mackay, A.M.; Beck, S.C.; Jaiswal, R.K.; Douglas, R.; Mosca, J.D.; Moorman, M.A.; Simonetti, D.W.; Craig, S.; Marshak, D.R. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 1999, 284, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Lazennec, G.; Jorgensen, C. Concise review: Adult multipotent stromal cells and cancer: Risk or benefit? Stem Cells 2008, 26, 1387–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. De Ugarte, D.A.; Alfonso, Z.; Zuk, P.A.; Elbarbary, A.; Zhu, M.; Ashjian, P.; Benhaim, P.; Hedrick, M.H.; Fraser, J.K. Differential expression of stem cell mobilization-associated molecules on multi-lineage cells from adipose tissue and bone marrow. Immunol. Lett. 2003, 89, 267–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Conget, P.A.; Minguell, J.J. Phenotypical and functional properties of human bone marrow mesenchymal progenitor cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 1999, 181, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. da Silva, C.L.; Goncalves, R.; Crapnell, K.B.; Cabral, J.M.S.; Zanjani, E.D.; Almeida-Porada, G. A human stromal-based serum-free culture system supports the ex vivo expansion/maintenance of bone marrow and cord blood hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Exp. Hematol. 2005, 33, 828–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Van Overstraeten-Schlogel, N.; Beguin, Y.; Gothot, A. Role of stromal-derived factor-1 in the hematopoietic-supporting activity of human mesenchymal stem cells. Eur. J. Haematol. 2006, 76, 488–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, N.; Feugier, P.; Serrurrier, B.; Latger-Cannard, V.; Lesesve, J.F.; Stoltz, J.F.; Eljaafari, A. Human mesenchymal stem cells improve ex vivo expansion of adult human CD34+ peripheral blood progenitor cells and decrease their allostimulatory capacity. Exp. Hematol. 2007, 35, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Carrancio, S.; Blanco, B.; Romo, C.; Muntion, S.; Lopez-Holgado, N.; Blanco, J.F.; Brinon, J.G.; San Miguel, J.F.; Sanchez-Guijo, F.M.; del Canizo, M.C. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for improving hematopoietic function: An in vitro and in vivo model. Part 2: Effect on bone marrow microenvironment. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e26241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Almeida-Porada, G.; Porada, C.D.; Tran, N.; Zanjani, E.D. Cotransplantation of human stromal cell progenitors into preimmune fetal sheep results in early appearance of human donor cells in circulation and boosts cell levels in bone marrow at later time points after transplantation. Blood 2000, 95, 3620–3627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Noort, W.A.; Kruisselbrink, A.B.; Anker, P.S.I.; Kruger, M.; van Bezooijen, R.L.; de Paus, R.A.; Heemskerk, M.H.M.; Lowik, C.W.G.M.; Falkenburg, J.H.; Willemze, R.; et al. Mesenchymal stem cells promote engraftment of human umbilical cord blood-derived CD34(+) cells in NOD/SCID mice. Exp. Hematol. 2002, 30, 870–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dominici, M.; Le Blanc, K.; Mueller, I.; Slaper-Cortenbach, I.; Marini, F.; Krause, D.; Deans, R.; Keating, A.; Prockop, D.; Horwitz, E. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 2006, 8, 315–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Di Nicola, M.; Carlo-Stella, C.; Magni, M.; Milanesi, M.; Longoni, P.D.; Matteucci, P.; Grisanti, S.; Gianni, A.M. Human bone marrow stromal cells suppress T-lymphocyte proliferation induced by cellular or nonspecific mitogenic stimuli. Blood 2002, 99, 3838–3843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Potian, J.A.; Aviv, H.; Ponzio, N.M.; Harrison, J.S.; Rameshwar, P. Veto-like activity of mesenchymal stem cells: Functional discrimination between cellular responses to alloantigens and recall antigens. J. Immunol. 2003, 171, 3426–3434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Klyushnenkova, E.; Mosca, J.D.; Zernetkina, V.; Majumdar, M.K.; Beggs, K.J.; Simonetti, D.W.; Deans, R.J.; McIntosh, K.R. T cell responses to allogeneic human mesenchymal stem cells: Immunogenicity, tolerance, and suppression. J. Biomed. Sci. 2005, 12, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Aggarwal, S.; Pittenger, M.F. Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate allogeneic immune cell responses. Blood 2005, 105, 1815–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Jones, B.J.; McTaggart, S.J. Immunosuppression by mesenchymal stromal cells: From culture to clinic. Exp. Hematol. 2008, 36, 733–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Galipeau, J.; Sensebe, L. Mesenchymal stromal cells: Clinical challenges and therapeutic opportunities. Cell Stem Cell 2018, 22, 824–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Pelagiadis, I.; Dimitriou, H.; Kalmanti, M. Biologic characteristics of mesenchymal stromal cells and their clinical applications in pediatric patients. J. Pediatr. Hematol./Oncol. 2008, 30, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Krampera, M.; Cosmi, L.; Angeli, R.; Pasini, A.; Liotta, F.; Andreini, A.; Santarlasci, V.; Mazzinghi, B.; Pizzolo, G.; Vinante, F.; et al. Role for interferon-gamma in the immunomodulatory activity of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 2006, 24, 386–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ren, G.; Su, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, X.; Ling, W.; L’Huillie, A.; Zhang, J.; Lu, Y.; Roberts, A.I.; Ji, W.; et al. Species variation in the mechanisms of mesenchymal stem cell-mediated immunosuppression. Stem Cells 2009, 27, 1954–1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. de Witte, S.F.H.; Merino, A.M.; Franquesa, M.; Strini, T.; van Zoggel, J.A.A.; Korevaar, S.S.; Luk, F.; Gargesha, M.; O’Flynn, L.; Roy, D.; et al. Cytokine treatment optimises the immunotherapeutic effects of umbilical cord-derived MSC for treatment of inflammatory liver disease. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2017, 8, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Han, X.; Yang, Q.; Lin, L.; Xu, C.; Zheng, C.; Chen, X.; Han, Y.; Li, M.; Cao, W.; Cao, K.; et al. Interleukin-17 enhances immunosuppression by mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Death Differ. 2014, 21, 1758–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. English, K.; Barry, F.P.; Field-Corbett, C.P.; Mahon, B.P. IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha differentially regulate immunomodulation by murine mesenchymal stem cells. Immunol. Lett. 2007, 110, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Xu, C.; Yu, P.; Han, X.; Du, L.; Gan, J.; Wang, Y.; Shi, Y. TGF-beta promotes immune responses in the presence of mesenchymal stem cells. J. Immunol. 2014, 192, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Waterman, R.S.; Tomchuck, S.L.; Henkle, S.L.; Betancourt, A.M. A new mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) paradigm: Polarization into a pro-inflammatory MSC1 or an Immunosuppressive MSC2 phenotype. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Cao, W.; Shi, Y. Plasticity of mesenchymal stem cells in immunomodulation: Pathological and therapeutic implications. Nat. Immunol. 2014, 15, 1009–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Luz-Crawford, P.; Djouad, F.; Toupet, K.; Bony, C.; Franquesa, M.; Hoogduijn, M.J.; Jorgensen, C.; Noel, D. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived interleukin 1 receptor antagonist promotes macrophage polarization and inhibits B cell differentiation. Stem Cells 2016, 34, 483–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Melief, S.M.; Schrama, E.; Brugman, M.H.; Tiemessen, M.M.; Hoogduijn, M.J.; Fibbe, W.E.; Roelofs, H. Multipotent stromal cells induce human regulatory T cells through a novel pathway involving skewing of monocytes toward anti-inflammatory macrophages. Stem Cells 2013, 31, 1980–1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ramasamy, R.; Fazekasova, H.; Lam, E.W.F.; Soeiro, I.; Lombardi, G.; Dazzi, F. Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit dendritic cell differentiation and function by preventing entry into the cell cycle. Transplantation 2007, 83, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Du Rocher, B.; Mencalha, A.L.; Gomes, B.E.; Abdelhay, E. Mesenchymal stromal cells impair the differentiation of CD14(++) CD16(-) CD64(+) classical monocytes into CD14(++) CD16(+) CD64(++) activate monocytes. Cytotherapy 2012, 14, 12–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chen, P.; Huang, Y.; Womer, K.L. Effects of mesenchymal stromal cells on human myeloid dendritic cell differentiation and maturation in a humanized mouse model. J. Immunol. Methods 2015, 427, 100–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jiang, X.X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, B.; Zhang, S.X.; Wu, Y.; Yu, X.D.; Mao, N. Human mesenchymal stem cells inhibit differentiation and function of monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Blood 2005, 105, 4120–4126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Zhang, W.; Ge, W.; Li, C.; You, S.; Liao, L.; Han, Q.; Deng, W.; Zhao, R.C. Effects of mesenchymal stem cells on differentiation, maturation, and function of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2004, 13, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Deng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, L.; Zhang, T.; Cheng, J.; Chen, G.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, Y. Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells instruct monocytes towards an IL10-producing phenotype by secreting IL6 and HGF. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Hu, C.D.; Kosaka, Y.; Marcus, P.; Rashedi, I.; Keating, A. Differential immunomodulatory effects of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells on natural killer cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2019, 28, 933–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Corcione, A.; Benvenuto, F.; Ferretti, E.; Giunti, D.; Cappiello, V.; Cazzanti, F.; Risso, M.; Gualandi, F.; Mancardi, G.L.; Pistoia, V.; et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate B-cell functions. Blood 2006, 107, 367–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Franquesa, M.; Mensah, F.K.; Huizinga, R.; Strini, T.; Boon, L.; Lombardo, E.; DelaRosa, O.; Laman, J.D.; Grinyó, J.M.; Weimar, W.; et al. Human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells abrogate plasmablast formation and induce regulatory B cells independently of T helper cells. Stem Cells 2015, 33, 880–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Asari, S.; Itakura, S.; Ferreri, K.; Liu, C.P.; Kuroda, Y.; Kandeel, F.; Mullen, Y. Mesenchymal stem cells suppress B-cell terminal differentiation. Exp. Hematol. 2009, 37, 604–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Rafei, M.; Hsieh, J.; Fortier, S.; Li, M.; Yuan, S.; Birman, E.; Forner, K.; Boivin, M.N.; Doody, K.; Tremblay, M.; et al. Mesenchymal stromal cell-derived CCL2 suppresses plasma cell immunoglobulin production via STAT3 inactivation and PAX5 induction. Blood 2008, 112, 4991–4998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Carter, N.A.; Vasconcellos, R.; Rosser, E.C.; Tulone, C.; Munoz-Suano, A.; Kamanaka, M.; Ehrenstein, M.R.; Flavell, R.A.; Mauri, C. Mice lacking endogenous IL-10-producing regulatory B cells develop exacerbated disease and present with an increased frequency of Th1/Th17 but a decrease in regulatory T cells. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 5569–5579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Davies, L.C.; Heldring, N.; Kadri, N.; Le Blanc, K. Mesenchymal stromal cell secretion of programmed death-1 ligands regulates T cell mediated immunosuppression. Stem Cells 2017, 35, 766–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Wang, Q.; Sun, B.; Wang, D.; Ji, Y.; Kong, Q.; Wang, G.; Wang, J.; Zhao, W.; Jin, L.; Li, H. Murine bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells cause mature dendritic cells to promote T-cell tolerance. Scand. J. Immunol. 2008, 68, 607–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Marson, A.; Kretschmer, K.; Frampton, G.M.; Jacobsen, E.S.; Polansky, J.K.; MacIsaac, K.D.; Levine, S.S.; Fraenkel, E.; von Boehmer, H.; Young, R.A. Foxp3 occupancy and regulation of key target genes during T-cell stimulation. Nature 2007, 445, 931–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Ge, W.; Jiang, J.; Arp, J.; Liu, W.; Garcia, B.; Wang, H. Regulatory T-cell generation and kidney allograft tolerance induced by mesenchymal stem cells associated with indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase expression. Transplantation 2010, 90, 1312–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. English, K.; Ryan, J.M.; Tobin, L.; Murphy, M.J.; Barry, F.P.; Mahon, B.P. Cell contact, prostaglandin E(2) and transforming growth factor beta 1 play non-redundant roles in human mesenchymal stem cell induction of CD4+CD25(High) forkhead box P3+ regulatory T cells. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2009, 156, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Rashedi, I.; Gómez-Aristizábal, A.; Wang, X.H.; Viswanathan, S.; Keating, A. TLR3 or TLR4 activation enhances mesenchymal stromal cell-mediated Treg induction via Notch signaling. Stem Cells 2017, 35, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ghannam, S.; Pene, J.; Torcy-Moquet, G.; Jorgensen, C.; Yssel, H. Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit human Th17 cell differentiation and function and induce a T regulatory cell phenotype. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 302–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Ren, J.; Li, B. The functional stability of FOXP3 and RORγt in Treg and Th17 and their therapeutic applications. Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol. 2017, 107, 155–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Terraza-Aguirre, C.; Campos-Mora, M.; Elizondo-Vega, R.; Contreras-Lopez, R.A.; Luz-Crawford, P.; Jorgensen, C.; Djouad, F. Mechanisms behind the immunoregulatory dialogue between mesenchymal stem cells and Th17 cells. Cells 2020, 9, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Friedenstein, A.J.; Piatetzky-Shapiro, I.I.; Petrakova, K.V. Osteogenesis in transplants of bone marrow cells. Development 1966, 16, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Secco, M.; Zucconi, E.; Vieira, N.M.; Fogaca, L.L.; Cerqueira, A.; Carvalho, M.D.; Jazedje, T.; Okamoto, O.K.; Muotri, A.R.; Zatz, M. Multipotent stem cells from umbilical cord: Cord is richer than blood! Stem Cells 2008, 26, 146–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Guillot, P.V.; Gotherstrom, C.; Chan, J.; Kurata, H.; Fisk, N.M. Human first-trimester fetal MSC express pluripotency markers and grow faster and have longer telomeres than adult MSC. Stem Cells 2007, 25, 646–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Kern, S.; Eichler, H.; Stoeve, J.; Kluter, H.; Bieback, K. Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or adipose tissue. Stem Cells 2006, 24, 1294–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Baksh, D.; Yao, R.; Tuan, R.S. Comparison of proliferative and multilineage differentiation potential of human mesenchymal stem cells derived from umbilical cord and bone marrow. Stem Cells 2007, 25, 1384–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Zhang, Z.Y.; Teoh, S.H.; Chong, M.S.K.; Schantz, J.T.; Fisk, N.M.; Choolani, M.A.; Chan, J. Superior osteogenic capacity for bone tissue engineering of fetal compared with perinatal and adult mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 2009, 27, 126–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Gotherstrom, C.; Ringden, O.; Westgren, M.; Tammik, C.; Le Blanc, K. Immunomodulatory effects of human foetal liver-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2003, 32, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Chan, C.K.; Wu, K.H.; Lee, Y.S.; Hwang, S.M.; Lee, M.S.; Liao, S.K.; Cheng, E.H.; See, L.C.; Tsai, C.N.; Kuo, M.L.; et al. The comparison of interleukin 6-associated immunosuppressive effects of human ESCs, fetal-type MSCs, and adult-type MSCs. Transplantation. Transplantation 2012, 94, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Hotta, T.; Kato, T.; Maeda, H.; Yamao, H.; Yamada, H.; Saito, H. Functional changes in marrow stromal cells in aplastic anaemia. Acta Haematol. 1985, 74, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Holmberg, L.A.; Seidel, K.; Leisenring, W.; Torok-Storb, B. Aplastic anemia: Analysis of stromal cell function in long-term marrow cultures. Blood 1994, 84, 3685–3690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Chao, Y.H.; Lin, C.W.; Pan, H.H.; Yang, S.F.; Weng, T.F.; Peng, C.T.; Wu, K.H. Increased apoptosis and peripheral blood mononuclear cell suppression of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in severe aplastic anemia. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2018, 65, e27247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Hamzic, E.; Whiting, K.; Gordon Smith, E.; Pettengell, R. Characterization of bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells in aplastic anaemia. Br. J. Haematol. 2015, 169, 804–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lu, S.; Ge, M.; Zheng, Y.; Li, J.; Feng, X.; Feng, S.; Huang, J.; Feng, Y.; Yang, D.; Shi, J.; et al. CD106 is a novel mediator of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells via NF-kappaB in the bone marrow failure of acquired aplastic anemia. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2017, 8, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Chao, Y.H.; Peng, C.T.; Harn, H.J.; Chan, C.K.; Wu, K.H. Poor potential of proliferation and differentiation in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells derived from children with severe aplastic anemia. Ann. Hematol. 2010, 89, 715–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. El-Mahgoub, E.R.; Ahmed, E.; Afifi, R.A.E.A.; Kamal, M.A.; Mousa, S.M. Mesenchymal stem cells from pediatric patients with aplastic anemia: Isolation, characterization, adipogenic, and osteogenic differentiation. Fetal Pediatr. Pathol. 2014, 33, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Huo, J.; Zhang, L.; Ren, X.; Li, C.; Li, X.; Dong, P.; Zheng, X.; Huang, J.; Shao, Y.; Ge, M.; et al. Multifaceted characterization of the signatures and efficacy of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells in acquired aplastic anemia. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2020, 11, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Li, S.; Qin, M.; Wu, R.; Meng, H.; He, Y.; Wang, B.; Zhou, X.; Zhu, G. Insensitive to PTH of CD8+ T cells regulate bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cell in aplastic anemia patients. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2020, 17, 1665–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Jiang, S.Y.; Xie, X.T.; Jiang, H.; Zhou, J.J.; Li, F.X.; Cao, P. Low expression of basic fibroblastic growth factor in mesenchymal stem cells and bone marrow of children with aplastic anemia. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 2014, 31, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Li, J.; Yang, S.; Lu, S.; Zhao, H.; Feng, J.; Li, W.; Ma, F.; Ren, Q.; Liu, B.; Zhang, L.; et al. Differential gene expression profile associated with the abnormality of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in aplastic anemia. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e47764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Bueno, C.; Roldan, M.; Anguita, E.; Romero-Moya, D.; Martin-Antonio, B.; Rosu-Myles, M.; del Canizo, C.; Campos, F.; Garcia, R.; Gomez-Casares, M.; et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells from patients with aplastic anemia maintain functional and immune properties and do not contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease. Haematologica 2014, 99, 1168–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Atmar, K.; Tulling, A.J.; Lankester, A.C.; Bartels, M.; Smiers, F.J.; van der Burg, M.; Mohseny, A.B. Functional and immune modulatory characteristics of bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells in patients with aplastic anemia: A systematic review. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 859668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Bacigalupo, A.; Valle, M.; Podesta, M.; Pitto, A.; Zocchi, E.; De Flora, A.; Pozzi, S.; Luchetti, S.; Frassoni, F.; Van Lint, M.T.; et al. T-cell suppression mediated by mesenchymal stem cells is deficient in patients with severe aplastic anemia. Exp. Hematol. 2005, 33, 819–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Li, J.; Lu, S.; Yang, S.; Xing, W.; Feng, J.; Li, W.; Zhao, Q.; Wu, H.; Ge, M.; Ma, F.; et al. Impaired immunomodulatory ability of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on CD4(+) T cells in aplastic anemia. Results Immunol. 2012, 2, 142–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Li, J.P.; Wu, K.H.; Chao, W.R.; Lee, Y.J.; Yang, S.F.; Chao, Y.H. Alterations of mesenchymal stem cells on regulating Th17 and Treg differentiation in severe aplastic anemia. Aging 2023, 15, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Chao, Y.H.; Wu, K.H.; Chiou, S.H.; Chiang, S.F.; Huang, C.Y.; Yang, H.C.; Chan, C.K.; Peng, C.T.; Wu, H.P.; Chow, K.C.; et al. Downregulated CXCL12 expression in mesenchymal stem cells associated with severe aplastic anemia in children. Ann. Hematol. 2015, 94, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Shipounova, I.N.; Petrova, T.V.; Svinareva, D.A.; Momotuk, K.S.; Mikhailova, E.A.; Drize, N.I.; Shipounova, I.N.; Petrova, T.V.; Svinareva, D.A.; Momotuk, K.S.; et al. Alterations in hematopoietic microenvironment in patients with aplastic anemia. Clin. Transl. Sci. 2009, 2, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Hu, K.X.; Sun, Q.Y.; Guo, M.; Ai, H.S. The radiation protection and therapy effects of mesenchymal stem cells in mice with acute radiation injury. Br. J. Radiol. 2010, 83, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Shim, S.; Lee, S.B.; Lee, J.G.; Jang, W.S.; Lee, S.J.; Park, S.; Lee, S.S. Mitigating effects of hUCB-MSCs on the hematopoietic syndrome resulting from total body irradiation. Exp. Hematol. 2013, 41, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Gan, J.; Meng, F.; Zhou, X.; Li, C.; He, Y.; Zeng, X.; Jiang, X.; Liu, J.; Zeng, G.; Tang, Y.; et al. Hematopoietic recovery of acute radiation syndrome by human superoxide dismutase-expressing umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells. Cytotherapy 2015, 17, 403–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Fernandez-Garcia, M.; Yanez, R.M.; Sanchez-Dominguez, R.; Hernando-Rodriguez, M.; Peces-Barba, M.; Herrera, G.; O’Connor, J.E.; Segovia, J.C.; Bueren, J.A.; Lamana, M.L. Mesenchymal stromal cells enhance the engraftment of hematopoietic stem cells in an autologous mouse transplantation model. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2015, 6, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Li, J.; Chen, H.; Lv, Y.B.; Wang, Q.; Xie, Z.J.; Ma, L.H.; He, J.; Xue, W.; Yu, S.; Guo, J.; et al. Intraperitoneal injection of multiplacentas pooled cells treatment on a mouse model with aplastic anemia. Stem Cells Int. 2016, 2016, 3279793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Zhang, J.; Zhou, S.; Zhou, Y.; Feng, F.; Wang, Q.; Zhu, X.; Zhao, J.; Fu, H.; Lv, M.; Ai, H.; et al. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) with the potential to ameliorate platelet recovery, enhance megakaryopoiesis, and inhibit apoptosis of bone marrow cells in a mouse model of radiation-induced thrombocytopenia. Cell Transpl. 2016, 25, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zhao, J.; Chen, J.; Huang, F.; Wang, J.; Su, W.; Zhou, J.; Qi, Q.; Cao, F.; Sun, B.; Liu, Z.; et al. Human gingiva tissue-derived MSC ameliorates immune-mediated bone marrow failure of aplastic anemia via suppression of Th1 and Th17 cells and enhancement of CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells differentiation. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2019, 11, 7627–7643. [Google Scholar]
  118. Galderisi, U.; Peluso, G.; Di Bernardo, G. Clinical trials based on mesenchymal stromal cells are exponentially increasing: Where are we in recent years? Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2022, 18, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Jovic, D.; Yu, Y.; Wang, D.; Wang, K.; Li, H.; Xu, F.; Liu, C.; Liu, J.; Luo, Y. A brief overview of global trends in MSC-based cell therapy. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2022, 18, 1525–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Peslak, S.A.; Olson, T.; Babushok, D.V. Diagnosis and treatment of aplastic anemia. Curr. Treat. Options Oncol. 2017, 18, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. DeZern, A.E.; Guinan, E.C. Aplastic anemia in adolescents and young adults. Acta Haematol. 2014, 132, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Boddu, P.C.; Kadia, T.M. Updates on the pathophysiology and treatment of aplastic anemia: A comprehensive review. Expert Rev. Hematol. 2017, 10, 433–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Chao, Y.H.; Wu, H.P.; Chan, C.K.; Tsai, C.; Peng, C.T.; Wu, K.H. Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012, 2012, 759503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Fouillard, L.; Bensidhoum, M.; Bories, D.; Bonte, H.; Lopez, M.; Moseley, A.M.; Smith, A.; Lesage, S.; Beaujean, F.; Thierry, D.; et al. Engraftment of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells in the bone marrow of a patient with severe idiopathic aplastic anemia improves stroma. Leukemia 2003, 17, 474–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Xiao, Y.; Jiang, Z.J.; Pang, Y.; Li, L.; Gao, Y.; Xiao, H.W.; Li, Y.H.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Q. Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stromal cell treatment from related donors for patients with refractory aplastic anemia. Cytotherapy 2013, 15, 760–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Cle, D.V.; Santana-Lemos, B.; Tellechea, M.F.; Prata, K.L.; Orellana, M.D.; Covas, D.T.; Calado, R.T. Intravenous infusion of allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells in refractory or relapsed aplastic anemia. Cytotherapy 2015, 17, 1696–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Pang, Y.; Xiao, H.W.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Z.H.; Li, L.; Gao, Y.; Li, H.B.; Jiang, Z.J.; Tan, H.; Lin, J.R.; et al. Allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells expanded in vitro for treatment of aplastic anemia: A multicenter phase II trial. Stem cells Transl. Med. 2017, 6, 1569–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Lan, Y.; Liu, F.; Chang, L.; Liu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yi, M.; Cai, Y.; Feng, J.; Han, Z.; Han, Z.; et al. Combination of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells and standard immunosuppressive regimen for pediatric patients with severe aplastic anemia. BMC Pediatr. 2021, 21, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Jaganathan, B.G.; Tisato, V.; Vulliamy, T.; Dokal, I.; Marsh, J.; Dazzi, F.; Bonnet, D. Effects of MSC co-injection on the reconstitution of aplastic anemia patient following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Leukemia 2010, 24, 1791–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Chao, Y.H.; Tsai, C.; Peng, C.T.; Wu, H.P.; Chan, C.K.; Weng, T.; Wu, K.H. Cotransplantation of umbilical cord MSCs to enhance engraftment of hematopoietic stem cells in patients with severe aplastic anemia. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2011, 46, 1391–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Wang, H.; Yan, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, L.; Liu, J.; Guo, Z. Cotransplantation of allogeneic mesenchymal and hematopoietic stem cells in children with aplastic anemia. Pediatrics 2012, 129, e1612–e1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Si, Y.; Yang, K.; Qin, M.; Zhang, C.; Du, Z.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Yue, Y.; Feng, Z. Efficacy and safety of human umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy in children with severe aplastic anemia following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A retrospective case series of 37 patients. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 2014, 31, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Li, X.H.; Gao, C.J.; Da, W.M.; Cao, Y.B.; Wang, Z.H.; Xu, L.X.; Wu, Y.M.; Liu, B.; Liu, Z.Y.; Yan, B.; et al. Reduced intensity conditioning, combined transplantation of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells in patients with severe aplastic anemia. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e89666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Xiao, H.; Yao, Z.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Q.; Wu, B.; Nie, D.; Li, Y.; Pang, Y.; et al. Cotransplantation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with severe aplastic anemia: An interim summary for a multicenter phase II trial results. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2017, 52, 704–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Xu, L.; Liu, Z.; Wu, Y.; Yang, X.; Cao, Y.; Li, X.; Yan, B.; Li, S.; Da, W.; Wu, X. Clinical evaluation of haploidentical hematopoietic combined with human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells in severe aplastic anemia. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2018, 23, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Wang, Z.; Yu, H.; Cao, F.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Feng, W.; Liu, X.; Yu, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Li, L.; et al. Donor-derived marrow mesenchymal stromal cell co-transplantation following a haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation trail to treat severe aplastic anemia in children. Ann. Hematol. 2019, 98, 473–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Ding, L.; Han, D.M.; Zheng, X.L.; Yan, H.M.; Xue, M.; Liu, J.; Zhu, L.; Guo, Z.K.; Mao, N.; Ning, H.M.; et al. Infusion of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cells combined with mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of severe aplastic anemia in adult patients yields curative effects. Cytotherapy 2022, 24, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Sheng, X.F.; Li, H.; Hong, L.L.; Zhuang, H. Combination of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells in patients with severe aplastic anemia: A retrospective controlled study. Turk. J. Hematol. 2022, 39, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Troyer, D.L.; Weiss, M.L. Wharton’s jelly-derived cells are a primitive stromal cell population. Stem Cells 2008, 26, 591–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Gotherstrom, C.; West, A.; Liden, J.; Uzunel, M.; Lahesmaa, R.; Le Blanc, K. Difference in gene expression between human fetal liver and adult bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Haematologica 2005, 90, 1017–1026. [Google Scholar]
Ijms 24 04464 g001 550
Figure 1. Pathophysiology of acquired idiopathic aplastic anemia.
Figure 1. Pathophysiology of acquired idiopathic aplastic anemia.
Ijms 24 04464 g001
Ijms 24 04464 g002 550
Figure 2. Criteria of the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT) for the definition of human MSCs.
Figure 2. Criteria of the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT) for the definition of human MSCs.
Ijms 24 04464 g002
Ijms 24 04464 g003 550
Figure 3. Plasticity of MSCs in immunomodulation. Being receptive to environmental signals, MSCs can gain immunomodulatory capacity for both promoting and inhibiting immune reactions. IDO and/or iNOS serve as an “on-off” switch that determines the outcome of immunomodulation by MSCs.
Figure 3. Plasticity of MSCs in immunomodulation. Being receptive to environmental signals, MSCs can gain immunomodulatory capacity for both promoting and inhibiting immune reactions. IDO and/or iNOS serve as an “on-off” switch that determines the outcome of immunomodulation by MSCs.
Ijms 24 04464 g003
Ijms 24 04464 g004 550
Figure 4. Association between MSCs and the development of AA and MSC therapy in AA.
Figure 4. Association between MSCs and the development of AA and MSC therapy in AA.
Ijms 24 04464 g004
Table
Table 1. MSC transplantation in animal models of AA.
Table 1. MSC transplantation in animal models of AA.
ReferenceAnimalsAttempt to Induce AAMSC SourceMSC AdministrationEfficacy of MSC Therapy
[111]BALB/c miceIR (5.5 Gy)Allogenic BM2.5 × 107/kg, IV, once, 4 h after IRRapid recovery of blood cells; lower apoptotic ratio of BM cells; increase in BM hematopoietic islands; recovery of CFU-GM and CFU-F
[111]BALB/c miceIR (8 Gy)Allogenic BMThree groups: 2.5, 5, or 15 × 107/kg, IV, once, cotransplanted with 1 × 109/kg of donor BM cellsImprovements in survival, but not in those receiving 15 × 107/kg MSCs
[112]BALB/c miceIR (7 Gy)Human cord blood2 × 106, IV, once, 4 h after IRGreater proliferation of BM and PB cells; better hematopoietic reconstitution
[113]BALB/c miceIR (5.8 Gy)Human umbilical cords + ECSOD1 × 106, IV, twice, 1 h and 48 h after IRImprovements in survival; promoted hematopoietic recovery; decrease in radiation-induced O2- and apoptosis
[114]B6D2F1 miceIR (5 Gy)Autologous adipose tissue6 × 105, IV, once, cotransplanted with HSCsImprovements in hematopoietic reconstitution; enhanced donor HSC engraftment; facilitated migration and homing of donor HSCs
[115]BALB/cBy miceIR (4 Gy) + lymph node cell infusionAllogenic multiplacenta pooled cells1 × 107/kg, IP, once, 7 days after IRLonger survival time; improved PB hemoglobin levels, but not BM architecture response
[116]BALB/c miceIR (4 Gy)Rat adipose tissue2 × 106, IV, once, immediately after IRBetter recovery of platelets and leukocytes in PB, but not RBCs; increase in BM total CFUs and megakaryocyte-CFUs; improved BM cellularity; inhibited apoptosis of BM cells; antiapoptotic effects mediated via the PI3K/Akt pathway
[117]CB6F1 miceIR (5 Gy) + lymph node cell infusionHuman gingiva tissue2 × 106, IV, once, 6 days after IRImprovements in survival; attenuated T cells-mediated BM damage; protective effects by regulating the balance of Th1, Th17, and Tregs
[100]CByB6F1 miceIR (5 Gy) + lymph node cell infusionHuman umbilical cords1 × 106, IV, once, 3 days after IRImprovements in survival; alleviate body weight decline; ameliorated pathological damages; regained hematopoiesis and immunoregulatory capacity
AA: aplastic anemia; BM: bone marrow; CFU: colony-forming unit; CFU-F: colony-forming unit-fibroblast; CFU-GM: colony-forming unit-granulocyte macrophage; ECSOD: extracellular superoxide dismutase; HSCs: hematopoietic stem cells; IP: intraperitoneal injection; IR: irradiation; IV: intravenous infusion; MSC: mesenchymal stem cell; PB: peripheral blood; RBCs: red blood cells; Tregs: regulatory T cells.
Table
Table 2. Studies on MSC infusion for patients with AA.
Table 2. Studies on MSC infusion for patients with AA.
ReferenceNumber of PatientsDisease Status
(SAA/NSAA)		MSC SourceMSC AdministrationMain Findings
[124]1Refractory SAAAllogeneic relative BMTwice (2 × 106/kg and 6 × 106/kg), IVNo effects on hematopoiesis; partial recovery of BM stroma; MSC engraftment detected in recipient BM; death due to invasive fungal infection
[125]18Refractory AA
(4/14)		Allogeneic relative BM5.0–7.1 × 105/kg, IV, onceAchieved CR or PR at 1 year in 6 patients; no major adverse events; increase in Tregs in PB
[126]9Refractory or relapsed AA
(7/2)		Allogeneic HLA- mismatched unrelative BM1.3–4.5 × 106/kg, IV, weekly, 2–5 timesAchieved PR at 6 months in only 2 patients; no significant improvement in clinical hematologic responses; no infusion-related adverse events; four deaths due to heart failure and infections; no evidence for MSC engraftment in recipient BM
[127]74Refractory AA
(24/50)		Allogeneic BM1–2 × 106/kg, IV, weekly, for 4 weeks28.4% overall response (6.8% CR; 21.6% PR); 87.8% overall survival at 2 years; no significant adverse events
[128]9Newly diagnosed SAA in childrenAllogeneic umbilical cords1 × 106/kg, IV, weekly, for 3 weeksCompared to that in patients receiving IST alone, no significant differences in early response rates and long-term outcomes
AA: aplastic anemia; BM: bone marrow; CR: complete response; IST: immunosuppressive therapy; IV: intravenous infusion; MSC: mesenchymal stem cell; NSAA: non-severe aplastic anemia; PB: peripheral blood; PR: partial response; SAA: severe aplastic anemia; Tregs: regulatory T cells.
Table
Table 3. Studies on co-transplantation of MSCs and HSCs for patients with SAA.
Table 3. Studies on co-transplantation of MSCs and HSCs for patients with SAA.
ReferencePatient NumberStatusMSC SourceMSC AdministrationMain Findings
[129]1Refractory SAA for MUD PBSCTThird-party donor1 × 106/kg, twice, 1st dose on day 0 and 2nd boost on day + 26Hematopoietic engraftment; sustained remission
[130]2Children with refractory SAA for MUD PBSCT5/6 MUD umbilical cords4.2–4.3 × 106/kg, once, 4 h before HSC infusionFaster neutrophil and platelet engraftment; no acute or chronic GVHD; no infusion-related adverse events
[131]6Children with refractory SAA for HSCTUmbilical cords or BM0.85–2.5 × 106/kg, once, before HSC infusionStable HSC engraftment; no severe acute GVHD; no infusion-related adverse events
[132]37Pediatric patients with refractory SAA for allogeneic HSCTUmbilical cords0.78–3.41 × 106/kg, one (n = 20) or more times (n = 17), infusion frequency depending on GVHD severityEvidence of proliferative BM; 100% successful HSC engraftment; 74.2% OS; decrease in death due to infection and organ failure; no effective control in patients with severe GVHD and concomitant serious infection; no significant adverse effects
[133]17Refractory SAA for haploidentical HSCTUmbilical cords2.87–10 × 106/kg, 6 h before HSC infusionNo primary graft failure; 23.5% grade III–IV acute GVHD; 14.2% moderate and severe chronic GVHD; 76.5% OS at 6 months; no infusion-related adverse events
[134]44SAA for haploidentical HSCTAllogeneic BM3.2–4.1 × 106/kg, 1st dose on day 0 and 2nd dose on day + 14, additional doses weekly for 1–4 weeks if poor graft function and severe GVHDReduced graft failure and severe GVHD in haploidentical HSCT: 97.6% hematopoietic reconstitution and full donor chimerism, 29.3% grade II–IV acute GVHD, 14.6% chronic GVHD; 77.3% OS; no infusion toxicity
[135]24SAA for haploidentical HSCTUmbilical cords5 × 105/kg, once, 4 h before HSC infusionAll achieved donor chimerism within 1 month; 50% acute GVHD; 83.3% OS at 6 months
[136]33Children with SAA for haploidentical HSCTDonor BM1 × 106/kg, twice, 1st dose on day 0 (6 h before HSC infusion) and 2nd dose on day + 14Faster hematopoietic implantation; 100% hematopoietic reconstitution and full donor chimerism; effective prevention of severe GVHD (25.71% grade II–IV acute GVHD, 22.86% chronic GVHD); 85.71% OS; no infusion toxicity
[137]25SAA for haploidentical HSCTUmbilical cords1 × 106/kg, once, on day 0All achieved neutrophil engraftment; achieved platelet engraftment in 23 patients; 32% grade II acute GVHD; no grade III–IV acute GVHD; 28% chronic GVHD; 71.78% OS
[138]47SAA for haploidentical HSCTUmbilical cords1 × 106/kg, once, 4 h before HSC infusionCompared to those without MSC infusion, faster neutrophil engraftment, lower cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD, similar rate of acute GVHD, better 5-year OS
BM: bone marrow; GVHD: graft-versus-host disease; HSC: hematopoietic stem cell; HSCT: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; MSC: mesenchymal stem cell; MUD: matched unrelated donor; OS: overall survival; PBSCT: peripheral blood stem cell transplantation; SAA: severe aplastic anemia.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.-A.; Li, J.-P.; Wu, K.-H.; Yang, S.-F.; Chao, Y.-H. Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Acquired Aplastic Anemia: The Spectrum from Basic to Clinical Utility. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 4464. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24054464

AMA Style

Wang X-A, Li J-P, Wu K-H, Yang S-F, Chao Y-H. Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Acquired Aplastic Anemia: The Spectrum from Basic to Clinical Utility. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(5):4464. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24054464

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xing-An, Ju-Pi Li, Kang-Hsi Wu, Shun-Fa Yang, and Yu-Hua Chao. 2023. "Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Acquired Aplastic Anemia: The Spectrum from Basic to Clinical Utility" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 5: 4464. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24054464

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop