Next Article in Journal
Smart Helmet-Based Proximity Warning System to Improve Occupational Safety on the Road Using Image Sensor and Artificial Intelligence
Next Article in Special Issue
Sports Participation and Academic Performance in Primary School: A Cross-Sectional Study in Chinese Children
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: McKinlay et al. Effects of Post-Exercise Whey Protein Consumption on Recovery Indices in Adolescent Swimmers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7761
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effects of Physical Activity on Positive Emotions in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Walking, Running, Swimming: An Analysis of the Effects of Land and Water Aerobic Exercises on Cognitive Functions and Neural Substrates

1
IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, 00179 Rome, Italy
2
Department of Humanities, Federico II University of Naples, 80138 Naples, Italy
3
Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy
4
Department of Human Sciences, Guglielmo Marconi University, 00193 Rome, Italy
5
Department of Neuroscience ‘Rita Levi Montalcini’, University of Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
6
Department of Neuroscience, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RY, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(23), 16310; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316310
Submission received: 11 November 2022 / Revised: 2 December 2022 / Accepted: 2 December 2022 / Published: 6 December 2022

Abstract

:
In the brain and cognitive reserves framework, aerobic exercise is considered as a protective lifestyle factor able to induce positive effects on both brain structure and function. However, specific aspects of such a beneficial effect still need to be completely clarified. To this aim, the present narrative review focused on the potential brain/cognitive/neural reserve–construction mechanisms triggered by different aerobic exercise types (land activities; such as walking or running; vs. water activities; such as swimming), by considering human and animal studies on healthy subjects over the entire lifespan. The literature search was conducted in PubMed database. The studies analyzed here indicated that all the considered kinds of activities exert a beneficial effect on cognitive/behavioral functions and on the underlying brain neurobiological processes. In particular, the main effects observed involve the cognitive domains of memory and executive functions. These effects appear related to structural and functional changes mainly involving the fronto-hippocampal axis. The present review supports the requirement of further studies that investigate more specifically and systematically the effects of each type of aerobic activity, as a basis to plan more effective and personalized interventions on individuals as well as prevention and healthy promotion policies for the general population.

1. Introduction

In the last two decades the relationship between brain damage and clinical symptoms has appeared to be more complex previously thought. Additionally, it has becoming clearer that healthy elderly individuals can recruit larger or additional brain regions than healthy young individuals to perform the same cognitive tasks [1]. Reserve mechanisms have been hypothesized as acting to make the brain more resilient to injuries by using pre-existent neural resources or by using neural and cognitive compensatory processes. In this framework, the reserve hypothesis has been developed, which posits that not only in aging, but also across the entire lifespan, exposure to stimulating activities is able to equip individuals with high-level resilience that can be spent in case of damage [2,3]. The reserve concept basically encompasses: the brain reserve, consisting in a very powerful cerebral structure, both at molecular and supra-molecular levels; the cognitive reserve, consisting in a high-level functional capacity to efficiently engage cognitive processes; the neural reserve, consisting in a high-level ability to recruit alternative cognitive strategies [4,5,6].
It is well known that several kinds of stimuli, including education, occupation, and leisure activities, such as cognitive, social and physical activities and exercises, contribute to the development of reserves. Namely, engagement in physical exercise has been associated with successful aging [7], and adequate motor function in the elderly has been considered as evidence of reserve occurrence [8]. Indeed, education has been found to be directly associated with walking speed and indirectly associated with white matter lesion load in the elderly [8].
In this context, the World Health Organization [9] released the global recommendation on physical activity for health, establishing a minimum level of physical activity (in terms of frequency, duration, type and total amount of exercise) during the entire lifespan. In fact, physical inactivity is the fourth risk factor for global mortality and the WHO promotes physical activity as a modifiable factor to prevent diseases and to promote general health in population. Anaerobic/aerobic exercise has been considered as an important protective factor for physical and psychological wellbeing [10]. Anaerobic activities include fast and short high-intensity exercises (such as sprinting and jumping) that do not require any oxygen consumption during their performance. Conversely, aerobic activities imply a moderate effort for a prolonged period (typical examples are walking or swimming) that allows the body to receive constant amounts of oxygen to produce energy during performance.
A large number of studies focusing on the neuroplastic effects of lifespan enriched experience have been conducted also in animal models, demonstrating that enhanced stimulations support the construction of brain/cognitive/neural reserve [11,12,13,14]. In animals, a multidimensional high-level stimulation is modeled by the experimental paradigm of environmental enrichment [15,16,17]. However, several studies have specifically focused on the analysis of the effects of physical activity in animal models, both in physiological and pathological conditions [18,19,20]. The use of rodent-based exercise models provides a number of advantages in comparison to human studies, because of their shorter gestational period and lifespan, more numerous progenies, superior genetical and physiological homogeneity, higher control in experimental procedure choices, and the larger possibility of investigation in the nervous system [21]. Moreover, rodent models provide the possibility of carrying out specific studies on the effects of anaerobic and aerobic physical activities by using specifical exercise tools and animals housed in conventional cages (without specifical exercise tools) as control subjects. Human anaerobic activities are modeled in animal resistance training designed to increase muscular strength and power and physical capacity [22]. Among the various models, an example of widely used procedures is ladder climbing, in which the animal is progressively trained to climb a ladder with a fixed load to the tail [23]. Another example is weightlifting performed by the animal standing upright with the weight typically added by means of a belt or a shoulder harness [24]. On the other hand, human aerobic activities are modeled in animals by means of voluntary or forced walking, running, and swimming (for details, see below). The effects of aerobic exercise on cognitive functions and neuroplasticity have been more widely investigated in animal models compared to studies involving anaerobic exercise [25].
On the basis of the described evidence, the aim of the present review was to offer an overview of physical activity, with particular attention to aerobic activities, as a potential builder of brain, cognitive, and neural reserves. To this aim, we considered human and animal studies on healthy subjects.
The review first presents a general section on the effects of aerobic exercise on cognitive functions and neural substrates by taking into account the evidence provided by animal and human studies. The following two sections focus on the potential brain/cognitive/neural reserve development mechanisms elicited by different aerobic exercise types: (1) land activities such as walking or running; and (2) water activities, such as swimming. Human and animal models were considered separately in these analyses.

2. Aerobic Exercise Effects on Cognitive Functions and Neural Substrates

2.1. Humans

In humans, it has been observed that aerobic exercise enhances both the mood and cognitive functioning (mainly, the executive functions) [26,27]. A recent study on young female artistic gymnasts compared with age/gender-matched sedentary children highlighted the beneficial effect of endurance and controlled aerobic training on working memory and learning abilities [28]. Studies showed that aerobic training performed for 3 days per week for at least one year limited the hippocampal decline due to normal aging processes [29,30,31,32]. Other studies showed an increase of hippocampal and entorhinal volumes after regular aerobic exercises [33,34].
Several studies have demonstrated the long-term effects of physical exercise on brain functioning, especially in the prefrontal areas and consequently on executive functions (see [35] for a review). The long-lasting beneficial effects of physical exercise on attention, working memory, cognitive flexibility, inhibition mechanisms and affective state, persisting up to 2 h after exercise cessation have also been demonstrated [35,36].
More recently, physical exercise has been found to be associated with better cognitive functioning in older adults, with increased serum neurofilament concentrations [37]. Some studies investigating the effect of different kinds of physical exercises not only on cognition [35,38] but also on the mood and emotional states, reported beneficial effects in individuals practicing sports [35,39]. Moreover, it has been shown that open skill sports (e.g., tennis) trained not only motor but also cognitive functions, in particular, inhibitory control [40,41]. Interestingly, a study investigating the effect of physical exercise on brain functional connectivity in Olympic athletes showed the strongest connections in the thalamo-sensorimotor network of the swimmers reporting the highest world rankings [42].
Recently, a study focusing on aerobic exercise associated this activity with less age-related gray and white matter loss [43]. By using functional magnetic resonance imaging (f-MRI) Vivar and colleagues [44] showed that higher-fit older adults achieved better results than low-fit adults on attentional tests. Interestingly, this finding was associated to increased BOLD signals in the prefrontal regions and by decreased signals in the anterior cingulate cortex.
Details on the original studies cited in this section are provided in Table 1.

2.2. Animal Models

As mentioned above, animal studies have also largely investigated the effects of physical activity on cognitive functions and neural substrates, shedding light on mechanisms able to build brain/cognitive/neural reserve [11,12,13,14]. In the bulk of studies carried out in animal models, it has been demonstrated that aerobic exercise exerts beneficial influence on cognition over the entire lifespan. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that even prenatal exposure to exercise (namely the exposure of the mothers to exercise during pregnancy) is able to improve behavioral and cognitive performance of the progeny, both in early life and in later ages [45]. Similar beneficial effects have been observed when the exposure occurred after birth, during infancy and adolescence [46], as well as during adulthood, middle age, and even aging [47,48,49,50]. Such a functional effect is accompanied by a number of neuroplastic rearrangements over the entire lifespan that involve molecular and supra-molecular processes (for a review see [51]). Many epigenetic mechanisms are believed to be involved in such structural and biological effects [52]. In particular, exposure to aerobic exercise elicits changes in the expression of neurotrophic factors and neurotransmitters [25]. Moreover, it is largely reported that a key role is played by the neurotrophin brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which appears to regulate also the exercise-induced hippocampal neurogenesis [53].
The beneficial effects of aerobic exercise have been demonstrated in animal models with reference to several cognitive functions. To give some examples, 14 days of voluntary aerobic exercise exerted a long-lasting improvement on hippocampus-dependent memory tasks, in both female and male adult mice [54,55]. The beneficial effects of aerobic exercise beneficial effects have been shown both on short- and long-term memory performance. Alomari et al. [56] demonstrated that adult rats exposed to aerobic exercise for periods of different durations (1, 7, 14, and 28 days) showed enhanced performance both in short- and in long-term memory tasks. Such an improvement was evident after seven days of training, with no further significant enhancements after longer training periods. However, other inconsistent and not completely clear results are present in the literature. The effects of chronic voluntary aerobic exercise have been investigated at different ages in mice [57]. Animals were tested in learning and memory tasks as well as in cognitive flexibility tasks at adult age (4 months), middle age (9 months), and old age (14 months). Spatial recognition memory ameliorated in exercised middle-aged mice, but not in adult and old mice. In addition, reduced object recognition memory and cognitive flexibility were seen in exercised adult and old mice. Similarly, Segabinazi and colleagues [58] showed that adult rats previously exposed to a six-week period of aerobic training did not exhibit any improvement when evaluated for cognitive flexibility.

2.3. Methodology of Literature Search

Thus, although aerobic exercise has been considered as a lifestyle factor that might lead to increased physical and mental health throughout life, acting as a reserve promoter [4,59], specific aspects in such a frame need to be studied in greater depth. In particular, the present review focuses on the potential brain/cognitive/neural reserve development mechanisms elicited by different aerobic exercise types (land activities, such as walking or running, vs. water activities, such as swimming) in animal models and human beings.
For the human studies, the literature search was conducted in PubMed database, by screening the records obtained by searching for the combination of the “aerobic exercise” OR “walking” OR “running” OR “swimming” AND “cognition” OR “neural bas*” keywords. Moreover, full texts and reference lists were screened to identify further potentially relevant articles. Articles fulfilling the following criteria were included in the present overview: as population of interest, healthy human subjects of every age were included; as interventions of interest, we selected the practice of aerobic exercise, namely the practice of walking, running, or swimming; as control group of interest, we selected human subjects not practicing aerobic exercise; as outcomes of interest, we selected structural and functional effects of aerobic exercise. No language limitation was selected. No publication period limitation was selected. Records indexed up to September 2022 were screened.
For the animal studies, the literature search was conducted in PubMed database, by screening the records obtained by searching for the combination of the “aerobic exercise” OR “running wheel” OR “treadmill” OR “swimming” AND “cognition” OR “neural bas*” key-words. Moreover, full texts and reference lists were screened to identify further potentially relevant articles. Articles fulfilling the following criteria were included in the present overview: as a population of interest, healthy rodents of every age were included; as interventions of interest, we selected exposure to aerobic exercise, namely exposure to running wheels, treadmills, or swimming; as control group of interest, we selected animals not exposed to aerobic exercise; as outcomes of interest, we selected structural and functional effects of aerobic exercise. No language limitation was selected. No publication period limitation was selected. Records indexed up to September 2022 were screened.

3. Land Activities: Walking and Running Effects on Cognitive Functions and Neural Substrates

3.1. Humans

A recent study investigated brain structural and functional features in endurance runners (ER) [60]. The Authors found in the ER group compared to controls greater grey matter (GM) volumes and thicker thickness in the left precentral gyrus together with an increase of functional connectivity in the right post- and pre-central gyri [60]. Moreover, the ER group showed increased GM volume in the bilateral hippocampus and increased functional connectivity hippocampal-driven with the supplementary motor area, middle cingulate cortex, and left posterior lobe of cerebellum [60]. Finally, the ER group showed higher fractional anisotropy, an index of microstructural integrity of white matter, in the corpus callosum, left internal capsule, in the left corona radiata, and bilateral precuneus [60], suggesting thus that regular ER training impacts positively on brain structure and function.
It has also been shown that running increases neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus (DG), a part of the hippocampus that continues to proliferate during adulthood [61,62,63]. Moreover, it is well known that exercise induces high BDNF levels in serum associated with increased hippocampal volumes [30]. On the contrary, lower BDNF levels are associated with smaller hippocampal volumes as effect of aging [64]. It has been shown that physical activity impacts on grey matter volumes during aging, in particular in brain areas associated with cognition [65]. Hippocampal volumes are very sensitive to the positive effect of aerobic exercise [65]. Moreover, it was shown that the volumetric increase is lost in participants who are no longer regularly engaged in running [66]. Furthermore, after running, activation of the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex has been described in association with better executive functions [67].
From a behavioral viewpoint, the relationship between physical exercise and cognitive functioning is complicated because of several factors, such as modality, intensity and duration of the physical activity impacting on brain and cognition [68,69,70,71]. Recently, a study documented that high-intensity intermittent running enhanced executive functions in adolescents, improving their reaction times and accuracy in attentional tasks [72]. Also, long-distance marches have been reported to improve working memory performances in middle-aged athletes (age range: 40–68 years) [73].
Details on the original studies cited in this section are provided in Table 2.

3.2. Animal Models

Human walking and running activities may be modeled in rodents through experimental paradigms based on exposure to different kinds of voluntary and involuntary exercise, that can be scheduled to construct an acute or chronic model [74]. The exposure to voluntary aerobic activity is typically carried out by means of running wheels or an equivalent tool, such as an angled rotating running track [21]. Animal cages may be equipped with one or more wheels to provide the animals with free access to exercise; control cages are equipped with locked wheels. The minimal stress imposed to animals allows to easily realize long-term exposures. In addition, running wheels may be used as an involuntary exercise paradigm, by utilizing motorized wheels, which provide the researcher with the greater possibility of experimental variable controls [22]. However, the more widely used model of involuntary exercise is the walking/running treadmill. In this case, the researcher is able to modulate, besides the duration of the exposure, also the speed and the inclination of the apparatus in a progressive manner [75].
Animal studies focusing on juvenile age animals have documented the beneficial effects of the exposure to walking and running, both at functional and at structural levels, since the improvements in cognitive performance were accompanied by plastic rearrangements in the brain. A six-week exposure to free-access to a running wheel in 25-day-old rats induced the amelioration of spatial learning and memory performance, accompanied by increased hippocampal and prefrontal neuronal densities as well as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and BDNF levels. In association, anxiety levels and blood corticosterone amounts decreased [76]. A six-week exposure of 25-day-old rats to involuntary aerobic activity (treadmill; 30 min/day; 5 day/week; 8 m/min) induced similar beneficial effects, but at a lower level in comparison to voluntary activity [76]. Similarly, Merritt and Rhodes [77] documented that 30 days of voluntary wheel-running in six-week-old mice improved learning performance and increased hippocampal neurogenesis. Also, O’Leary et al. [48] reported that a seven-week period of free access to a running wheel did not change the performance of four-week-old rats in fear conditioning, but increased mRNA expression of plasticity-related hippocampal markers (including BDNF, synaptophysin, Creb, PSD-95, Arc, TLX, and DCX). As for involuntary exposure to aerobic activity, Chen et al. [78] reported that a 21-day treadmill training (60 min/day; 12 m/min) exercise regime enhanced the motor learning of four-week-old mice and increased dendritic spine formation in the motor cortex.
For adult age animals, substantial evidence in animal studies confirms the beneficial effects of walking and running activities in the development of reserves. Several investigations demonstrated that a long-term (one to five months) exposure to voluntary access to running wheels improved adult (two/three-month-old) rodents’ spatial learning and memory performance and increased the expression of plasticity-related hippocampal proteins, particularly BDNF [79,80,81]. In addition, Li et al. [82] reported that eight weeks of free access to wheel running ameliorated in three-month-old rats working memory performance and increased hippocampal theta activity. Motta-Teixeira et al. [83] reported that even seven days of exposure to voluntary wheel running are enough to induce hippocampal neurogenesis in two-month-old rats, though not accompanied by any improved working memory performance. As for the indication provided by the studies on forced aerobic activity with a treadmill, Li et al. [84] reported that exposure of three-month-old mice to a 28-day training (60 min/day; 10 m/min) improved learning and memory performance, and increased hippocampal neurogenesis. Wang and Wang [85] documented that eight-week-old rats exposed to different intensities (15–20–30 m/min) of treadmill training for 30 days (40 min/day) showed improved spatial memory abilities and increased neurogenesis. A caveat comes from the study by Sun and colleagues [86], who reported that seven-day high-intensity treadmill running (up to 20 m/min, imposed until the rats showed fatigue, expressed as no response to electric stimulation) may induce an impairment of spatial learning ability and hippocampal LTP, accompanied by increased hippocampal expression of hippocampal inflammatory factors in adult rats (200 g, age not specified).
Finally, evidence about reserve-building processes induced by walking and running is available also in aging animal models. Xu et al. [87] exposed 16-month-old mice to five months of voluntary wheel running (60 min/day; 5 days/week) and reported improved spatial learning and memory and increased density of hippocampal pyramidal cell dendritic spines. On the other hand, 30 days of involuntary treadmill running (30 min/day; 8 m/min; 5 days/week) enhanced blood volume in the motor cortex and hippocampus of 25-month-old mice [88].
Details on the original studies cited in this section are provided in Table 3.

4. Water Activities: Swimming Effects on Cognitive Functions and Neural Substrates

4.1. Humans

A recent study showed that master swimmer athletes gained successful aging in terms of better cognitive performances, better physical, psychological, and social functioning than non-athletes [89]. This research supported the association between regular aerobic exercise and reserve accumulation. Unfortunately, no brain measures were considered in this community-dwelling study [89]. Another behavioral study investigating the effect of swimming on cognition reported that the regular practice exerted a positive effect of moderation mainly on executive functioning in healthy elderly individuals [90].
Long-term swimming practice induced neural and behavioral changes in young competitive swimmers compared to novices in terms of higher motor cortical inhibition and superior sensory-motor skills when engaged in a water environment [91]. It has been shown that water immersion induces both peripheral (increased venous return and decreased antigravity muscle activity) and central responses (increased cerebral blood flow) [92,93,94,95]. Expert swimmers showed higher self-perception of passive movement sensation in a water environment than non-expert swimmers, which is likely due to higher activity in the somatosensory cortex [96]. It is well known that several brain areas, including the sensorimotor cortex, primary motor cortex, posterior parietal cortex, striatum and cerebellum are involved in sensorimotor learning. A recent study showed that sensorimotor skills of expert swimmers were superior to those observed in non-expert swimmers and that the excitability of the primary motor cortex was increased in the latter compared to the former [91].
Details on the original studies cited in this section are provided in Table 4.

4.2. Animal Models

The exposure of rodents to swimming sessions is quite easy to make. This paradigm requires a simpler tool in comparison to those needed to model walking or running. In addition, it is possible to expose a large number of animals at once to swimming sessions [75]. This experimental setting is based on the innate ability of the rodents to swim, and the control conditions can be realized by placing the animals in shallow water and maintaining the same temperature and the same duration as those used for the experimental conditions [21].
As was observed in the walking and running models, swimming animal models provided evidence that confirms neuroprotective effects over the entire lifespan, although fewer studies are available.
For juvenile age, four-week-old rats exposed to nine weeks of swimming regime (60–90 min/day; 5 days/week) showed improved learning abilities and attenuated accumulation of oxidatively damaged proteins [97].
Similarly, Drumond et al. [98] demonstrated that adult rats (150–200 g; age not specified) previously exposed to eight weeks of swimming regime (30 min/day; 5 days/week) showed improved spatial short-term memory and increased hippocampal levels of neuronal calcium sensor-1, a calcium-binding protein that regulates synaptic transmission and cortico-hippocampal plasticity, and controls learning and memory abilities and spontaneous exploration. Neuroprotective effects were found also in a six-week period of involuntary aerobic activity, obtained by exposing adult rats (180–200 g; age not specified) to alternate swimming (5 min) and resting (5 min) sessions for 60 min/day (5 days/week). By applying such a protocol, Alomari et al. [99] found improved learning and memory abilities, accompanied by increased expression of hippocampal BDNF. Moreover, by using the very same swimming protocol, Alomari et al. [56] demonstrated that even seven days of this exercise exerts enhancing effects on learning and memory abilities, with no significant further improvements following longer treatment periods (up to 28 days).
Finally, Radák et al. [97] demonstrated that swimming activity (60–90 min/day; 5 days/week; 9 weeks) significantly improved learning abilities and attenuated the accumulation of oxidatively damaged proteins even in old rats (14-month-old).
Details on the original studies cited in this section are provided in Table 5.

5. Discussion

The present review aimed to deepen the impact of aerobic exercise on cognitive functions and structural/functional brain substrates, and to demonstrate the presence of protective effects in both human and animal model studies. Such effects have been investigated with regard to the practice of both land and water activities. In particular, we considered walking, running, and swimming exercises.
On the whole, human and animal studies indicated that all these kinds of activities exert a beneficial action on cognitive/behavioral functions and on underlying neurobiological processes. In particular, the main effects observed in humans and animals involved the cognitive domain encompassing memory and executive functions, in line with previous evidence [28,35,36,54,55,56,100]. Moreover, these effects appeared to be related to structural and functional changes in several brain areas, and mainly in the fronto-hippocampal axis [60,61,62,63,79,80,81]. The reported evidence was achieved in healthy subjects and allows us to postulate that such beneficial changes constitute potential processes of brain maintaining and successful adaptation that can be spent in the case of neural damage and pathological aging. In this perspective, the evidence can be interpreted as supporting the key role of aerobic exercise in developing brain/cognitive/neural reserve [4,5]. Indeed, the beneficial effects of aerobic exercise are highly documented with regard to memory functions, which are specifically affected during aging [101]. On the whole, the human studies we considered showed the beneficial effect of aerobic exercise on memory and executive functions [10,35,101], and also on brain volume and functional connectivity involving mainly the hippocampus and prefrontal structures [60,67]. Animal studies indicated that aerobic exercise induces beneficial effects on learning and memory as well as on executive functions [56,99]. Such behavioral findings are associated with the observation of structural rearrangements, such as spinogenesis and neurogenesis, in hippocampal areas that are accompanied by changes in the expression of BDNF, which is known to be heavily involved in triggering exercise-related pathways [76,77].
A specific aim of the present review was to attempt to disentangle the peculiar effects of different kinds of aerobic exercise. Although our analysis of the literature provided a structured framework of the available evidence, the current state of knowledge does not permit us to clearly define the superiority of land or water activities in promoting healthy brain functioning. According to our literature analysis, positive effects were attested for both land and water activities, in human and animal models. These findings are inserted in a more general framework attesting the beneficial effects of aerobic activity on cognition [10,28,35,36,54,55,56]. Studies carried out on community dwelling showed a reduced risk of developing dementia in individuals practicing aerobic exercise at various levels of intensity [40]. Such evidence was provided by categorizing the different exercises on the basis of their intensity but not in terms of the specific typology. However, even by focusing the analysis on the latter criterium, we did not obtain a clear indication that supports the superiority of either typology of aerobic exercise (land or water activities). Controlled studies directly comparing the different exercises are needed to shed light on this issue. At present, some suggestions can be derived from human studies, which indicate that long-lasting aerobic training is more effective in protecting brain structure and function in comparison to intermitting or short-lasting practice [40,72]. However, animal studies suggest that even brief periods of aerobic exercise may induce some plastic rearrangement in the brain [56,83]. Additionally, indications on the beneficial effects of aerobic exercise are available at all ages of the lifespan. Specific studies differentially investigating the effects of aerobic exercise begun in childhood or later in life could provide useful indications to promote tuned and proper healthy policies for the different ages in the general population.
Despite the fact that humans practicing physical activity is a voluntary choice per se, animal studies provide differential indications about voluntary or forced aerobic activities. In this framework, suggestions are presently in favor of the superior beneficial effects of voluntary activity [76,86]. Such evidence suggests that a key role in the positive effects of aerobic activity is played by the motivation in engaging with it per se. As is well known, motivation implies reward mechanisms, which require the activation of the dopaminergic system [102,103]. It has been recently demonstrated that dopaminergic depletion plays a key role in the onset of cognitive and brain dysfunctions observed since the early stages of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s Disease, both in animal [104] as well as in clinical [105,106] studies. Therefore, if aerobic exercise engages the motivational reward system and promotes an overflow of dopamine widespread in the brain, we hypothesize that it could be beneficial in both healthy subjects and those with pathological conditions for this reason alone. In particular, we argue that a dopamine overflow might mitigate the onset of cognitive symptoms in the early phases of neurodegenerative disorders. Thus, aerobic exercise may be considered as an important and accessible tool to promote healthy aging. Moreover, from this point of view it could be very interesting to investigate the effects of different aerobic activities on general psychological and emotional well-being.
However, a limitation of the present paper is that it is merely a narrative and not a systematic review based on the selection of relevant findings in relation to the topic of interest. Thus, the indications provided may be considered as suggestions and not as comprehensive summarizing findings. Future systematic studies on such an important issue appear desirable.

6. Conclusions

In conclusion, the human and animal studies analyzed here indicate that all the considered kinds of activities exert a beneficial effect on cognitive/behavioral functions and on the underlying brain neurobiological processes. In particular, the main effects observed involve the cognitive domains of memory and executive functions. These effects appear related to structural and functional changes mainly involving the fronto-hippocampal axis. The engagement of the motivational reward system in aerobic exercise may be involved in the beneficial effects induced by such an activity.
The evidence reported here and summarized in Figure 1 supports the requirement of further studies that investigate more specifically the effects of each kind of aerobic activity, as a basis in which to plan more effective and personalized interventions on individuals as well as for prevention and healthy promotion policies for the population. Such suggestions are in line with the WHO recommendations [107] affirming the importance of physical activity not only for the health of the individuals but also for the entire environment and the well-being of society. This is one of the objectives targeted in the Sustainable Development Agenda 2030 [107].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and study design, L.S. and F.G.; literature search and analysis, L.S., S.B., F.B. and F.G.; writing—original draft preparation, L.S. and F.G.; writing—review and editing, L.S., L.P., L.M., M.B., C.C. and F.G.. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Laboratories of the IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia are supported in part by Ministero della Salute (Italian Ministry of Health) (Linea di Ricerca corrente 2021-2022).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The concept reported in this manuscript is not associated with raw data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cabeza, R.; Albert, M.; Belleville, S.; Craik, F.I.M.; Duarte, A.; Grady, C.L.; Lindenberger, U.; Nyberg, L.; Park, D.C.; Reuter-Lorenz, P.A.; et al. Author Correction: Maintenance, reserve and compensation: The cognitive neuroscience of healthy ageing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2018, 19, 772, Erratum for: Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2018, 19, 701–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Stern, Y. What is cognitive reserve? Theory and research application of the reserve concept. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2002, 8, 448–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Stern, Y.; Arenaza-Urquijo, E.M.; Bartrés-Faz, D.; Belleville, S.; Cantilon, M.; Chetelat, G.; Ewers, M.; Franzmeier, N.; Kempermann, G.; Kremen, W.S.; et al. The Reserve, Resilience and Protective Factors PIA Empirical Definitions and Conceptual Frameworks Workgroup Whitepaper: Defining and investigating cognitive reserve, brain reserve, and brain maintenance. Alzheimers Dement. 2020, 16, 1305–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Serra, L.; Gelfo, F.; Petrosini, L.; Di Domenico, C.; Bozzali, M.; Caltagirone, C. Rethinking the Reserve with a Translational Approach: Novel Ideas on the Construct and the Interventions. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2018, 65, 1065–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Serra, L.; Gelfo, F. What good is the reserve? A translational perspective for the managing of cognitive decline. Neural Regen. Res. 2019, 14, 1219–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gelfo, F.; Petrosini, L. Environmental Enrichment Enhances Cerebellar Compensation and Develops Cerebellar Reserve. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pruchno, R.A.; Wilson-Genderson, M. A Longitudinal Examination of the Effects of Early Influences and Midlife Characteristics on Successful Aging. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2015, 70, 850–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Elbaz, A.; Vicente-Vytopilova, P.; Tavernier, B.; Sabia, S.; Dumurgier, J.; Mazoyer, B.; Singh-Manoux, A.; Tzourio, C. Motor function in the elderly: Evidence for the reserve hypothesis. Neurology 2013, 81, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. World Health Organization. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mandolesi, L.; Polverino, A.; Montuori, S.; Foti, F.; Ferraioli, G.; Sorrentino, P.; Sorrentino, G. Effects of Physical Exercise on Cognitive Functioning and Wellbeing: Biological and Psychological Benefits. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Petrosini, L.; De Bartolo, P.; Foti, F.; Gelfo, F.; Cutuli, D.; Leggio, M.G.; Mandolesi, L. On whether the environmental enrichment may provide cognitive and brain reserves. Brain Res. Rev. 2009, 61, 221–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gelfo, F.; Mandolesi, L.; Serra, L.; Sorrentino, G.; Caltagirone, C. The Neuroprotective Effects of Experience on Cognitive Functions: Evidence from Animal Studies on the Neurobiological Bases of Brain Reserve. Neuroscience 2018, 370, 218–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gelfo, F. Does Experience Enhance Cognitive Flexibility? An Overview of the Evidence Provided by the Environmental Enrichment Studies. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cutuli, D.; Landolfo, E.; Petrosini, L.; Gelfo, F. Environmental Enrichment Effects on the Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Expression in Healthy Condition, Alzheimer’s Disease, and Other Neurodegenerative Disorders. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2022, 85, 975–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mandolesi, L.; Gelfo, F.; Serra, L.; Montuori, S.; Polverino, A.; Curcio, G.; Sorrentino, G. Environmental Factors Promoting Neural Plasticity: Insights from Animal and Human Studies. Neural Plast. 2017, 2017, 7219461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Sampedro-Piquero, P.; Begega, A. Environmental Enrichment as a positive behavioral intervention across the lifespan. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2017, 15, 459–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Balietti, M.; Conti, F. Environmental enrichment and the aging brain: Is it time for standardization? Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2022, 139, 104728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jahangiri, Z.; Gholamnezhad, Z.; Hosseini, M. Neuroprotective effects of exercise in rodent models of memory deficit and Alzheimer’s. Metab. Brain Dis. 2019, 34, 21–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Crowley, E.K.; Nolan, Y.M.; Sullivan, A.M. Exercise as a therapeutic intervention for motor and non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease: Evidence from rodent models. Prog. Neurobiol. 2019, 172, 2–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Short, A.K.; Bui, V.; Zbukvic, I.C.; Hannan, A.J.; Pang, T.Y.; Kim, J.H. Sex-dependent effects of chronic exercise on cognitive flexibility but not hippocampal Bdnf in aging mice. Neuronal Signal 2022, 6, NS20210053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Seo, D.Y.; Lee, S.R.; Kim, N.; Ko, K.S.; Rhee, B.D.; Han, J. Humanized animal exercise model for clinical implication. Pflug. Arch. 2014, 466, 1673–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Börzsei, D.; Szabó, R.; Hoffmann, A.; Harmath, A.; Sebestyén, J.; Osman, J.; Juhász, B.; Priksz, D.; Varga, C.; Pósa, A. Multiple Applications of Different Exercise Modalities with Rodents. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2021, 2021, 3898710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Testa, M.T.J.; Cella, P.S.; Marinello, P.C.; Frajacomo, F.T.T.; Padilha, C.S.; Perandini, P.C.; Moura, F.A.; Duarte, J.A.; Cecchini, R.; Guarnier, F.A.; et al. Resistance Training Attenuates Activation of STAT3 and Muscle Atrophy in Tumor-Bearing Mice. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 880787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Łochyński, D.; Kaczmarek, D.; Grześkowiak, M.; Majerczak, J.; Podgórski, T.; Celichowski, J. Motor Unit Force Potentiation and Calcium Handling Protein Concentration in Rat Fast Muscle After Resistance Training. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 652299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hamilton, G.F.; Rhodes, J.S. Exercise Regulation of Cognitive Function and Neuroplasticity in the Healthy and Diseased Brain. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2015, 135, 381–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hillman, C.H.; Erickson, K.I.; Kramer, A.F. Be smart, exercise your heart: Exercise effects on brain and cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 9, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hyodo, K.; Takashi, J.; Suwabe, K.; Soya, H.; Nagamatsu, T. Acute effects of light-intensity, slow-tempo aerobic dance exercise on mood and executive function in older adults. Bull. Phys. Fit. Res. Inst. 2019, 117, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Serra, L.; Raimondi, S.; Di Domenico, C.; Maffei, S.; Lardone, A.; Liparoti, M.; Sorrentino, P.; Caltagirone, C.; Petrosini, L.; Mandolesi, L. The beneficial effects of physical exercise on visuospatial working memory in preadolescent children. AIMS Neurosci. 2021, 8, 496–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Erickson, K.I.; Prakash, R.S.; Voss, M.W.; Chaddock, L.; Hu, L.; Morris, K.S.; White, S.M.; Wójcicki, T.R.; McAuley, E.; Kramer, A.F. Aerobic fitness is associated with hippocampal volume in elderly humans. Hippocampus 2009, 19, 1030–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Erickson, K.I.; Voss, M.W.; Prakash, R.S.; Basak, C.; Szabo, A.; Chaddock, L.; Kim, J.S.; Heo, S.; Alves, H.; White, S.M.; et al. Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 3017–3022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Maass, A.; Düzel, S.; Goerke, M.; Becke, A.; Sobieray, U.; Neumann, K.; Lövden, M.; Lindenberger, U.; Bäckman, L.; Braun-Dullaeus, R.; et al. Vascular hippocampal plasticity after aerobic exercise in older adults. Mol. Psychiatry 2015, 20, 585–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ten Brinke, L.F.; Bolandzadeh, N.; Nagamatsu, L.S.; Hsu, C.L.; Davis, J.C.; Miran-Khan, K.; Liu-Ambrose, T. Aerobic exercise increases hippocampal volume in older women with probable mild cognitive impairment: A 6-month randomised controlled trial. Br. J. Sport. Med. 2015, 49, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Duzel, E.; van Praag, H.; Sendtner, M. Can physical exercise in old age improve memory and hippocampal function? Brain 2016, 139, 662–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Whiteman, A.S.; Young, D.E.; Budson, A.E.; Stern, C.E.; Schon, K. Entorhinal volume, aerobic fitness, and recognition memory in healthy young adults: A voxel-based morphometry study. Neuroimage 2016, 126, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Basso, J.C.; Suzuki, W.A. The Effects of Acute Exercise on Mood, Cognition, Neurophysiology, and Neurochemical Pathways: A Review. Brain Plast. 2017, 2, 127–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Chiu, C.N.; Chen, C.Y.; Muggleton, N.G. Sport, time pressure, and cognitive performance. Prog. Brain Res. 2017, 234, 85–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Desai, P.; Dhana, K.; DeCarli, C.; Wilson, R.S.; McAninch, E.A.; Evans, D.A.; Rajan, K.B. Examination of Neurofilament Light Chain Serum Concentrations, Physical Activity, and Cognitive Decline in Older Adults. JAMA Netw. Open 2022, 5, e223596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Aly, M.; Ahmed, A.M.; Hasan, A.; Kojima, H.; Abdelhakem, R.A. Sport Experience and Physical Activity: Event-Related Brain Potential and Task Performance Indices of Attention in Young Adults. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2019, 4, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Zhang, Z.; Wang, T.; Kuang, J.; Herold, F.; Ludyga, S.; Li, J.; Hall, D.L.; Taylor, A.; Healy, S.; Yeung, A.S.; et al. The roles of exercise tolerance and resilience in the effect of physical activity on emotional states among college students. Int. J. Clin. Health Psychol. 2022, 22, 100312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, C.H.; Chang, C.C.; Liang, Y.M.; Shih, C.M.; Chiu, W.S.; Tseng, P.; Hung, D.L.; Tzeng, O.J.; Muggleton, N.G.; Juan, C.H. Open vs. closed skill sports and the modulation of inhibitory control. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e55773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Montuori, S.; D’Aurizio, G.; Foti, F.; Liparoti, M.; Lardone, A.; Pesoli, M.; Sorrentino, G.; Mandolesi, L.; Curcio, G.; Sorrentino, P. Executive functioning profiles in elite volleyball athletes: Preliminary results by a sport-specific task switching protocol. Hum. Mov. Sci. 2019, 63, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vivar, C.; Potter, M.C.; Praag, H.V. Thalamo-Sensorimotor Functional Connectivity Correlates with World Ranking of Olympic, Elite, and High Performance Athletes. Neural Plast 2017, 2017, 1473783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Cheng, S.T. Cognitive Reserve and the Prevention of Dementia: The Role of Physical and Cognitive Activities. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2016, 18, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Vivar, C.; Potter, M.C.; van Praag, H. All about running: Synaptic plasticity, growth factors and adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci. 2013, 15, 189–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Kim, T.W.; Park, S.S.; Park, H.S. Effects of Exercise Training during Advanced Maternal Age on the Cognitive Function of Offspring. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ivy, A.S.; Yu, T.; Kramár, E.; Parievsky, S.; Sohn, F.; Vu, T. A Unique Mouse Model of Early Life Exercise Enables Hippocampal Memory and Synaptic Plasticity. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Barha, C.K.; Falck, R.S.; Davis, J.C.; Nagamatsu, L.S.; Liu-Ambrose, T. Sex differences in aerobic exercise efficacy to improve cognition: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in older rodents. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2017, 46, 86–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. O’Leary, J.D.; Hoban, A.E.; Cryan, J.F.; O’Leary, O.F.; Nolan, Y.M. Differential effects of adolescent and adult-initiated voluntary exercise on context and cued fear conditioning. Neuropharmacology 2019, 145, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Bao, C.; He, C.; Shu, B.; Meng, T.; Cai, Q.; Li, B.; Wu, G.; Wu, B.; Li, H. Aerobic exercise training decreases cognitive impairment caused by demyelination by regulating ROCK signaling pathway in aging mice. Brain Res. Bull. 2021, 168, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Belviranlı, M.; Okudan, N. Differential effects of voluntary and forced exercise trainings on spatial learning ability and hippocampal biomarkers in aged female rats. Neurosci. Lett. 2022, 773, 136499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Arida, R.M.; Teixeira-Machado, L. The Contribution of Physical Exercise to Brain Resilience. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2021, 14, 626769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liang, J.; Wang, H.; Zeng, Y.; Qu, Y.; Liu, Q.; Zhao, F.; Duan, J.; Jiang, Y.; Li, S.; Ying, J.; et al. Physical exercise promotes brain remodeling by regulating epigenetics, neuroplasticity and neurotrophins. Rev. Neurosci. 2021, 32, 615–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Liu, P.Z.; Nusslock, R. Exercise-Mediated Neurogenesis in the Hippocampus via BDNF. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Butler, C.W.; Keiser, A.A.; Kwapis, J.L.; Berchtold, N.C.; Wall, V.L.; Wood, M.A.; Cotman, C.W. Exercise opens a temporal window for enhanced cognitive improvement from subsequent physical activity. Learn Mem. 2019, 26, 485–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dong, T.N.; Kramár, E.A.; Beardwood, J.H.; Al-Shammari, A.; Wood, M.A.; Keiser, A.A. Temporal endurance of exercise-induced benefits on hippocampus-dependent memory and synaptic plasticity in female mice. Neurobiol. Learn Mem. 2022, 194, 107658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Alomari, M.A.; Alzoubi, K.H.; Khabour, O.F. Swimming exercise improves short- and long-term memories: Time-course changes. Physiol. Rep. 2021, 9, e14851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Morgan, J.A.; Singhal, G.; Corrigan, F.; Jaehne, E.J.; Jawahar, M.C.; Baune, B.T. The effects of aerobic exercise on depression-like, anxiety-like, and cognition-like behaviours over the healthy adult lifespan of C57BL/6 mice. Behav. Brain Res. 2018, 337, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Segabinazi, E.; Gasperini, N.F.; Faustino, A.M.; Centeno, R.; Santos, A.S.D.; Almeida, W.; Bronauth, L.P.; Marcuzzo, S.; Pereira, L.O. Comparative overview of the effects of aerobic and resistance exercise on anxiety-like behavior, cognitive flexibility, and hippocampal synaptic plasticity parameters in healthy rats. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2020, 53, e9816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Nithianantharajah, J.; Hannan, A.J. The neurobiology of brain and cognitive reserve: Mental and physical activity as modulators of brain disorders. Prog. Neurobiol. 2009, 89, 369–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, R.; Li, L.; Xia, F.; Zou, L.; Yu, Q.; Lin, J.; Herold, F.; Perrey, S.; et al. Structural and functional brain signatures of endurance runners. Brain Struct. Funct. 2021, 226, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kuhn, H.G.; Dickinson-Anson, H.; Gage, F.H. Neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of the adult rat: Age-related decrease of neuronal progenitor proliferation. J. Neurosci. 1996, 16, 2027–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Eriksson, P.S.; Perfilieva, E.; Björk-Eriksson, T.; Alborn, A.M.; Nordborg, C.; Peterson, D.A.; Gage, F.H. Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus. Nat. Med. 1998, 4, 1313–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Spalding, K.L.; Bergmann, O.; Alkass, K.; Bernard, S.; Salehpour, M.; Huttner, H.B.; Boström, E.; Westerlund, I.; Vial, C.; Buchholz, B.A.; et al. Dynamics of hippocampal neurogenesis in adult humans. Cell 2013, 153, 1219–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Erickson, K.I.; Prakash, R.S.; Voss, M.W.; Chaddock, L.; Heo, S.; McLaren, M.; Pence, B.D.; Martin, S.A.; Vieira, V.J.; Woods, J.A.; et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor is associated with age-related decline in hippocampal volume. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30, 5368–5375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Erickson, K.I.; Leckie, R.L.; Weinstein, A.M. Physical activity, fitness, and gray matter volume. Neurobiol. Aging 2014, 35 (Suppl. S2), S20–S28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Fink, A.; Koschutnig, K.; Zussner, T.; Perchtold-Stefan, C.M.; Rominger, C.; Benedek, M.; Papousek, I. A two-week running intervention reduces symptoms related to depression and increases hippocampal volume in young adults. Cortex 2021, 144, 70–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Damrongthai, C.; Kuwamizu, R.; Suwabe, K.; Ochi, G.; Yamazaki, Y.; Fukuie, T.; Adachi, K.; Yassa, M.A.; Churdchomjan, W.; Soya, H. Benefit of human moderate running boosting mood and executive function coinciding with bilateral prefrontal activation. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 22657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chang, Y.K.; Labban, J.D.; Gapin, J.I.; Etnier, J.L. The effects of acute exercise on cognitive performance: A meta-analysis. Brain Res. 2012, 1453, 87–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Donnelly, J.E.; Hillman, C.H.; Castelli, D.; Etnier, J.L.; Lee, S.; Tomporowski, P.; Lambourne, K.; Szabo-Reed, A.N. Physical Activity, Fitness, Cognitive Function, and Academic Achievement in Children: A Systematic Review. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc. 2016, 48, 1197–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Janssen, I.; Dugan, S.A.; Karavolos, K.; Lynch, E.B.; Powell, L.H. Correlates of 15-year maintenance of physical activity in middle-aged women. Int. J. Behav. Med. 2014, 21, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Li, M.Y.; Huang, M.M.; Li, S.Z.; Tao, J.; Zheng, G.H.; Chen, L.D. The effects of aerobic exercise on the structure and function of DMN-related brain regions: A systematic review. Int. J. Neurosci. 2017, 127, 634–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hatch, L.M.; Dring, K.J.; Williams, R.A.; Sunderland, C.; Nevill, M.E.; Cooper, S.B. Effect of Differing Durations of High-Intensity Intermittent Activity on Cognitive Function in Adolescents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Wouters, H.; Aalbers, T.; Maessen, M.F.H.; Verbeek, A.L.M.; Rikkert, M.G.M.O.; Kessels, R.P.C.; Hopman, M.T.E.; Eijsvogels, T.M.H. Physical Activity and Cognitive Function of Long-Distance Walkers: Studying Four Days Marches Participants. Rejuvenation Res. 2017, 20, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Hastings, M.H.; Herrera, J.J.; Guseh, J.S.; Atlason, B.; Houstis, N.E.; Abdul Kadir, A.; Li, H.; Sheffield, C.; Singh, A.P.; Roh, J.D.; et al. Animal Models of Exercise from Rodents to Pythons. Circ. Res. 2022, 130, 1994–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Thu, V.T.; Kim, H.K.; Han, J. Acute and Chronic Exercise in Animal Models. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2017, 999, 55–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Uysal, N.; Kiray, M.; Sisman, A.R.; Camsari, U.M.; Gencoglu, C.; Baykara, B.; Cetinkaya, C.; Aksu, I. Effects of voluntary and involuntary exercise on cognitive functions, and VEGF and BDNF levels in adolescent rats. Biotech. Histochem. 2015, 90, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Merritt, J.R.; Rhodes, J.S. Mouse genetic differences in voluntary wheel running, adult hippocampal neurogenesis and learning on the multi-strain-adapted plus water maze. Behav. Brain Res. 2015, 280, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Chen, K.; Zheng, Y.; Wei, J.A.; Ouyang, H.; Huang, X.; Zhang, F.; Lai, C.S.W.; Ren, C.; So, K.F.; Zhang, L. Exercise training improves motor skill learning via selective activation of mTOR. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaaw1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Liu, Y.F.; Chen, H.I.; Wu, C.L.; Kuo, Y.M.; Yu, L.; Huang, A.M.; Wu, F.S.; Chuang, J.I.; Jen, C.J. Differential effects of treadmill running and wheel running on spatial or aversive learning and memory: Roles of amygdalar brain-derived neurotrophic factor and synaptotagmin I. J. Physiol. 2009, 587, 3221–3231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lee, M.C.; Okamoto, M.; Liu, Y.F.; Inoue, K.; Matsui, T.; Nogami, H.; Soya, H. Voluntary resistance running with short distance enhances spatial memory related to hippocampal BDNF signaling. J. Appl. Physiol. 2012, 113, 1260–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Venezia, A.C.; Guth, L.M.; Sapp, R.M.; Spangenburg, E.E.; Roth, S.M. Sex-dependent and independent effects of long-term voluntary wheel running on Bdnf mRNA and protein expression. Physiol. Behav. 2016, 156, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Li, J.Y.; Kuo, T.B.J.; Hung, C.T.; Yang, C.C.H. Voluntary exercise enhances hippocampal theta rhythm and cognition in the rat. Behav. Brain Res. 2021, 399, 112916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Motta-Teixeira, L.C.; Takada, S.H.; Machado-Nils, A.V.; Nogueira, M.I.; Xavier, G.F. Spatial learning and neurogenesis: Effects of cessation of wheel running and survival of novel neurons by engagement in cognitive tasks. Hippocampus 2016, 26, 794–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Li, H.; Liang, A.; Guan, F.; Fan, R.; Chi, L.; Yang, B. Regular treadmill running improves spatial learning and memory performance in young mice through increased hippocampal neurogenesis and decreased stress. Brain Res. 2013, 1531, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Wang, X.Q.; Wang, G.W. Effects of treadmill exercise intensity on spatial working memory and long-term memory in rats. Life Sci. 2016, 149, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Sun, L.N.; Li, X.L.; Wang, F.; Zhang, J.; Wang, D.D.; Yuan, L.; Wu, M.N.; Wang, Z.J.; Qi, J.S. High-intensity treadmill running impairs cognitive behavior and hippocampal synaptic plasticity of rats via activation of inflammatory response. J. Neurosci. Res. 2017, 95, 1611–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Xu, B.; Sun, A.; He, Y.; Qian, F.; Liu, L.; Chen, Y.; Luo, H. Running-induced memory enhancement correlates with the preservation of thin spines in the hippocampal area CA1 of old C57BL/6 mice. Neurobiol. Aging 2017, 52, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Mariotti, R.; Fattoretti, P.; Malatesta, M.; Nicolato, E.; Sandri, M.; Zancanaro, C. Forced mild physical training improves blood volume in the motor and hippocampal cortex of old mice. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2014, 18, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Geard, D.; Reaburn, P.R.J.; Rebar, A.L.; Dionigi, R.A. Masters Athletes: Exemplars of Successful Aging? J. Aging Phys. Act. 2017, 25, 490–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Abou-Dest, A.; Albinet, C.T.; Boucard, G.; Audiffren, M. Swimming as a positive moderator of cognitive aging: A cross-sectional study with a multitask approach. J. Aging Res. 2012, 2012, 273185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Sato, D.; Yamazaki, Y.; Yamashiro, K.; Onishi, H.; Baba, Y.; Ikarashi, K.; Maruyama, A. Elite competitive swimmers exhibit higher motor cortical inhibition and superior sensorimotor skills in a water environment. Behav. Brain Res. 2020, 395, 112835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Miyoshi, T.; Kimitaka, N.; Masashi, T.; Takeshi, S.; Masami, A. Altered activation pattern in synergistic ankle plantarflexor muscles in a reduced-gravity environment. Gait Posture 2006, 24, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Petersen, L.G.; Damgaard, M.; Petersen, J.C.G.; Norsk, P. Mechanisms of increase in cardiac output during acute weightlessness in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 2011, 111, 407–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Carter, H.H.; Spence, A.L.; Pugh, C.J.; Ainslie, P.; Naylor, L.H.; Green, D.J. Cardiovascular responses to water immersion in humans: Impact on cerebral perfusion. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2014, 306, R636–R640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Sato, D.; Yamashiro, K.; Yoshida, T.; Onishi, H.; Shimoyama, Y.; Maruyama, A. Effects of water immersion on short- and long-latency afferent inhibition, short-interval intracortical inhibition, and intracortical facilitation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2013, 124, 1846–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Kusanagi, K.; Sato, D.; Hashimoto, Y.; Yamada, N. Water Sensation During Passive Propulsion for Expert and Nonexpert Swimmers. Percept. Mot. Ski. 2017, 124, 662–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Radák, Z.; Kaneko, T.; Tahara, S.; Nakamoto, H.; Pucsok, J.; Sasvári, M.; Nyakas, C.; Goto, S. Regular exercise improves cognitive function and decreases oxidative damage in rat brain. Neurochem. Int. 2001, 38, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Drumond, L.E.; Mourão, F.A.; Leite, H.R.; Abreu, R.V.; Reis, H.J.; Moraes, M.F.; Pereira, G.S.; Massensini, A.R. Differential effects of swimming training on neuronal calcium sensor-1 expression in rat hippocampus/cortex and in object recognition memory tasks. Brain Res. Bull. 2012, 88, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Alomari, M.A.; Khabour, O.F.; Alzoubi, K.H.; Alzubi, M.A. Forced and voluntary exercises equally improve spatial learning and memory and hippocampal BDNF levels. Behav. Brain Res. 2013, 247, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Passarello, N.; Varini, L.; Liparoti, M.; Troisi Lopez, E.; Sorrentino, P.; Alivernini, F.; Gigliotta, O.; Lucidi, F.; Mandolesi, L. Boosting effect of regular sport practice in young adults: Preliminary results on cognitive and emotional abilities. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 957281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Voss, M.W.; Soto, C.; Yoo, S.; Sodoma, M.; Vivar, C.; van Praag, H. Exercise and Hippocampal Memory Systems. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2019, 23, 318–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Arias-Carrión, O.; Pŏppel, E. Dopamine, learning, and reward-seeking behavior. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. 2007, 67, 481–488. [Google Scholar]
  103. Serra, L.; Scocchia, M.; Meola, G.; D’Amelio, M.; Bruschini, M.; Silvestri, G.; Petrucci, A.; Di Domenico, C.; Caltagirone, C.; Koch, G.; et al. Ventral tegmental area dysfunction affects decision-making in patients with myotonic dystrophy type-1. Cortex 2020, 128, 192–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Nobili, A.; Latagliata, E.C.; Viscomi, M.T.; Cavallucci, V.; Cutuli, D.; Giacovazzo, G.; Krashia, P.; Rizzo, F.R.; Marino, R.; Federici, M.; et al. Dopamine neuronal loss contributes to memory and reward dysfunction in a model of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Serra, L.; D’Amelio, M.; Di Domenico, C.; Dipasquale, O.; Marra, C.; Mercuri, N.B.; Caltagirone, C.; Cercignani, M.; Bozzali, M. In vivo mapping of brainstem nuclei functional connectivity disruption in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2018, 72, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Serra, L.; D’Amelio, M.; Esposito, S.; Di Domenico, C.; Koch, G.; Marra, C.; Mercuri, N.B.; Caltagirone, C.; Artusi, C.A.; Lopiano, L.; et al. Ventral Tegmental Area Disconnection Contributes Two Years Early to Correctly Classify Patients Converted to Alzheimer’s Disease: Implications for Treatment. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2021, 82, 985–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. World Health Organization. Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018–2030: More Active People for a Healthier World; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The figure illustrates the effects of the aerobic exercises investigated in the manuscript by parallelizing activities in human and animal models.
Figure 1. The figure illustrates the effects of the aerobic exercises investigated in the manuscript by parallelizing activities in human and animal models.
Ijerph 19 16310 g001
Table 1. Studies on aerobic exercise effects on cognitive functions and neural substrates of healthy human subjects.
Table 1. Studies on aerobic exercise effects on cognitive functions and neural substrates of healthy human subjects.
AuthorsSample SizeDesignPhysical ExercisesCognitive/Behavioural EffectsBrain Effects
Aerobic physical activity
Elbaz et al., 2013 [8]n = 4010;
M/F% = 39%/61%
Age [range] = 65–85 years
Longitudinal study over 10 yearsWalking speed measured at baseline and after 4 years as 6 m by time-White matter lesions (deep, periventricular and total volumes assessed on structural MRI scans)
Hyodo et al., 2019 [27] n = 21
M/F = 10/11
Age [range] = 65–74 years
Cross-sectional study with repeated measure Single session: Cycling exercises (intensity = 60% of the individual ventilatory threshold; duration = 10′)
vs. dance exercises (intensity = 3 different movements [twisting the upper body; swinging the arms side to side; swinging the arms back] duration = 3′.20′ for each)
Improvement in the executive functions (by Stroop task, before the training and after 5 min at the end of the training) and in the mood (vitality, stability, pleasure, arousal) (by Two dimensional mood scale before and immediately after the exercises)-
Serra et al., 2021 [28]n = 28
M/F = 0/28
Age [range] = 7–10 years
Cross-sectional studyArtistic gymnastics (Intensity = 3 sessions a week for 2 years minimum; duration = 90′ for session) vs. no gymImprovement in the memory functions measured by the Table Radial Arm Maze task and in the schooling achievements assessed by BVN5-11 -
Erickson et al., 2009 [29]n = 165 M/F = 56/109
Age [range] = 59–81 years
Correlational studyAerobic exercises (by motor driven treadmill)Improvement in the cardiorespiratory aerobic fitness assessed by VO2 peakIncrease of hippocampal volumes measured by manual segmentation on T1-weighted images obtained on 3T scan
Erickson et al., 2011 [30]n = 120
Age [mean ± SD] = 66.5 ± 5.6 years
M%/F% = 33.5%/66.5%
Cross-sectional studyAerobic exercises (by motor driven treadmill; Intensity = 30–100 m/min with increments of 2% every 2 min; duration = 10′–40′ in seven weeks) vs. Stretching and toning exercise (four muscle toning exercises using dumbbells or resistance bands; two exercises for balance; one yoga sequences and one free exercise; Intensity = increasing the weight or repetitions; duration = seven weeks) Improvement in the memory function by computerized spatial memory task preformed before, after 6 months and at the end of the trainings Increase of hippocampal volumes measured by manual segmentation on T1-weighted images obtained on 3T scan. Scans were performed before, during and after trainings
Maass et al., 2015 [31]n = 40 M%/F% = 45%/55%
Age [mean ± SD] = 68.4 ± 4.3 years
Cross-sectional studyAerobic exercises in terms of running/walking by stationary treadmills (Intensity = 30-min interval training 3 times per week; duration = 12 weeks) vs. Stretching exercise by progressive muscle relaxation (Intensity = twice a week; Duration = 45′ each session for 12 weeks)Improvement in the recognition memory functions by the verbal learning memory test (free recall, 30-min delayed recall and recognition). Cognition was assessed before and after trainingsIncrease of hippocampal volumes assessed by manual segmentation using a 7T T1-weighted images and increase in the cerebral blood flow by 3T high resolution perfusion-weighted images. Scans were performed before and after tranings
Brinke et al., 2015 [32]n = 86
M/F = 0/86
Age [range] = 70–80 years
Cross-sectional study with repeated measureResistance Training (Keiser-based exercises; Intensity = 6–8 repetitions for two sets; Duration = 60′ daily) vs. Aerobic Training (outdoor walking program; Intensity = 40–80% of individual age-specific target heart rate; duration = 12 weeks) vs. Balance and tone Training by using stretching, motion exercises, balance exercises, functional and relaxation techniquesImprovement in the memory functions assessed by the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning test (immediate and 20-min delayed recall)Increase of hippocampal volumes assessed by automated segmentation of 3T T1-weighted images
Whiteman et al., 2016 [34] n = 33
M/F = 13/20
Age [range] = 18–30 years
Correlational studyAerobic exercises by treadmill (Intensity = speed 0.8 m/s and incline of 10%, increasing speed of 0.35% m/sec and incline of 2% grade every 3 min; Duration = volitional exhaustion criterium Improvement in the cardiorespiratory aerobic fitness by VO2 max and in memory functions by an inside/outside MRI scanner visual memory recognition testIncrease of entorhinal volumes assessed on 3T T1-weighed images by using the voxel-based morphometry approach
Chiu et al., 2017 [36]n = 31
M/F = 15/16
Age [mean ± SD] = 22.2 ± 4.3 years
Cross-sectional study with repeated measureOpen skills sports (Volleyball) vs. Closed skills (Exercise) sportsImprovement in the cognitive processing speed by flanker task; improvement in aerobic physical fitness by VO2 max after PACER test-
Desai et al., 2022 [37]n = 1158
M/F = 430/728
Age [mean ± SD] = 77.4 ± 4.3 years
Correlational studyPhysical activity assessed by US Health Interview Survey and divided in little activity (0 min of activity participation per week), medium activity (<150 min activity participation per week), high activity (>150 min activity participation per week)Decrease of cognitive decline assessed by the East Boston Memory test; the Mini Mental state Examination and the Symbol digit modalities test. Association with neurofilament concentration was tested-
Aly et al., 2019 [38]n = 33
Age [mean ± SD] = 19.7 ± 1.5 years
Cross-sectional studySwimming vs. Karate vs. generic physical activity assessed by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and divided in vigorous, moderate and light intensity Increase of attentional resources by the auditory oddball task Changes in neurophysiological activity by EEG measurement
Zhang et al., 2022 [39]n = 1117
M/F = 554/563
Age [mean ± SD] = 18.9 ± 1.2 years
Correlational studySwimming vs. Karate vs. generic physical activity assessed by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and divided in vigorous, moderate and light intensity Improvement in the cardiorespiratory aerobic fitness by VO2 Max and decrease of negative emotional states assessed by Depression Anxiety Stress scale and by Connor-Davidson resilience scale-
Wang et al., 2013 [40]n = 60
M/F = 60/0
Age [mean ± SD] = 20.2 ± 2.9 years
Cross-sectional studyOpen skills: Tennis vs. Closed skills: swimming vs. no physical activity assessed by a 7-day physical activity recall questionnaire divided in light, moderate, high, intense and sleep of PAImprovement in the inhibitory control assessed by Stop-signal task and in the Aerobic fitness assessed by VO2 Max-
Montuori et al., 2019 [41]n = 27
M/F = 27/0
Age [mean ± SD] = 25.3 ± 5.2 years
Cross-sectional studyVolleyball (Intensity = 2–4 h for session 5 times a week; duration = about 13 years of experience)Improvement in the executive functioning (Reaction time and accuracy in terms of ‘switch costs’ and errors in a switching task)-
Huang et al., 2017 [42] n = 30
M/F = 14/16
Age [range] = 20–22 years
Cross-sectional studySwimming. Athletes were divided in high-ranked Olympic and World Championship competitors and low-ranked individuals -Increased thalamo-cortical functional connectivity in the sensorymotor network assessed by 3T EPI images for resting-state fMRI
Abbreviations: BVN5-11 = Batteria per la Valutazione Neuropsicologica 5-11 (Battery for neuropsychological assessment 5-11); maximal rate of oxygen consumption; EEG = electroencefalography; fMRI = functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging; MRI = Magnetic resonance imaging.
Table 2. Studies on land activity effects on cognitive functions and neural substrates of healthy human subjects.
Table 2. Studies on land activity effects on cognitive functions and neural substrates of healthy human subjects.
AuthorsSample SizeDesignPhysical ExercisesCognitive/Behavioural EffectsBrain Effects
Land activities
Cao et al., 2020 [60] n = 42
M/F = 42/0 Age [mean ± SD] = 20.2 ± 2.9 years
Cross-sectional studyEndurance running (Duration = >3 years of running training) vs. no physical activity in the last 2 years-Increase of gray matter volume and cortical surface area in the precentral gyrus assessed by using 3T T1-weighted images; increase of functional connectivity into the same cortical regions assessed by using 3T EPI scans for resting-state fMRI; Increase of fractional anisotropy in the corpus callosum and corona radiata assessed by using 3T Diffusion weighted images
Fink et al., 2021 [66]n = 48
M/F = 21/27
Age [mean ± SD] = 23.0 ± 2.2 years
Cross-sectional study with repeated measureRunning (Intensity = 5 km for 60′ session; Duration = Two-weeks running intervention time delayed: first group performed running intervention between the first T1 and the second T2 test session; the second group performed the running intervention between the T2 and the third T3 test session)Decrease of depression levels assessed in two different tests sessions by using PANAS and CES-DIncrease of hippocampal volumes assessed by automatic segmentation on 3T T1-weighted images
Damrongthai et al., 2021 [67]n = 26
M/F = 18/8
Age [mean ± SD] = 23.0 ± 2.1 years
Cross-sectional studyRunning (Intensity = moderate running; Duration = single bout)Increase in the arousal and pleasure levels by TDMS; Decrease in the interference reaction time by Stroop test. All measures assessed before and after running trainingIncrease activation in the prefrontal hemodynamic response by using fNIRS
Hatch et al., 2021 [72]n = 38
M/F = 15/23
Age [mean ± SD] = 12.3 ± 0.4 years
Within-subject, randomized, counterbalanced, crossover designRunning trained by the LIST protocol (Intensity = 30-min high intensity intermittent running, 60-min intermittent running and rest; Duration = eight repetitions)Increase in the executive functions (interference reaction time and attention assessed by the Stroop test, Stenberg paradigm, Flanker test) -
Wouters et al., 2017 [73]n = 521
M/F = 267/254
Age [mean ± SD] = 12.3 ± 0.4 years
Correlational studyWalking, cycling etc. assessed by SQUASHCognition was assessed by BAMCOG; Positive association with working memory was found-
Abbreviations: BAMCOG = Brain Aging Monitor-Cognitive Assessment; CES-D = Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale; fNIRS = functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy; PANAS = Positive and Negative Affect Schedule; LIST = Loughborough Intermittent Shuttle Test; SQUASH = Short QUestionnaire to Assess Health-enhancing physical activity; TDMS = Two-Dimensional Mood Scale.
Table 3. Studies on land activity effects on cognitive functions and neural substrates of healthy animals.
Table 3. Studies on land activity effects on cognitive functions and neural substrates of healthy animals.
ReferenceSample
(Age or Weight at the Start of Treatment)
Kind of Exercise
(Duration)
Effects on Cognitive Functions and Neural Substrates
(Evaluation Methodology)
Liu et al., 2009 [79]Male BALB/c
mice
(3 months)
n = 10–18/group
Voluntary exercise protocol:
free access to a running wheel
(4 weeks)

Involuntary exercise protocol:
motorized treadmill exposure—
10 m/min−1; 20–60 min/day; 5 days/week
(4 weeks)
Ameliorated spatial memory (Morris water maze test; both protocols);
ameliorated aversive memory (one-trial passive avoidance; only involuntary protocol); increased hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) (ELISA; both protocols), tyrosine-related kinase B (TrkB) and Syt I levels (Western blot; both protocols); increased amygdalar BDNF (ELISA; only involuntary protocol), TrkB and Syt I levels (Western blot; only involuntary protocol); transiently increased serum corticosterone levels, returned to the resting state after 24 h (ELISA; only involuntary protocol)
Lee et al., 2012 [80]Male Wistar rats
(10 weeks)
n = 7–10/group
Voluntary exercise protocol:
free access to a running wheel
(4 weeks)
Ameliorated spatial learning (Morris water maze test); increased hippocampal BDNF protein (Western blot), and BDNF, TrkB, N-methyl-D-asparate receptor, protein kinase C mRNA expression (quantitative RT-PCR); unchanged plasma corticosterone levels (radioimmunoassay)
Li et al., 2013 [84] Male C57BL/6 mice
(3 months)
n = 24/group
Involuntary exercise protocol:
motorized treadmill exposure—
10 m/min; 60 min/day from 08:00 to 09:00
(4 weeks)
Ameliorated spatial learning and memory (Morris water maze test); increased hippocampal neurogenesis (immunohistochemistry); increased plasma corticosterone levels (radioimmunoassay)
Mariotti et al., 2014 [88]Male BALB/c
mice
(25 months)
n = 7–10/group
Involuntary exercise protocol:
motorized treadmill exposure—
8 m/min; 30 min/day; 5 days/week
(4 weeks)
Increased cerebral blood volume in hippocampus and motor cortex; unchanged cortical thickness (magnetic resonance imaging—by using a Biospec Tomograph equipped with a 4.7 T 33 cm bore horizontal magnet)
Merrit and Rhodes, 2015 [77]Male mice of different strains-B6, 129S1, B6D2F1, D2, and B6129F1
(6 weeks)
n = 10–11/group
Voluntary exercise protocol:
free access to a running wheel
(4 weeks)
Ameliorated spatial learning (4-arm plus water maze test); increased hippocampal neurogenesis (immunohistochemistry)
Uysal et al., 2015 [76]Male and female Wistar rats
(28 days)
n = 7/group; M/F 1:1
Voluntary exercise protocol:
free access to a running wheel
(6 weeks)
Ameliorated spatial learning and memory (Morris water maze test; both protocols); decreased anxiety levels (open field test; Morris water maze test; both protocols for males, but only voluntary protocol for females); increased hippocampal and prefrontal neuronal densities (cresyl violet staining; both protocols) increased vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and BDNF levels (immunohistochemistry; ELISA; both protocols); decreased serum corticosterone levels (not specified method; only voluntary protocol)
Involuntary exercise protocol:
motorized treadmill exposure—
8 m/min; 30 min/day; 5 days/week
(6 weeks)
Motta-Teixeira et al., 2016 [83]Male Wistar rats
(2 months)
n = 27–28/group
Voluntary exercise protocol:
free access to a running wheel
(7 days)
Unchanged working memory performance (Morris water maze test); increased hippocampal neurogenesis (immunohistochemistry)
Venezia et al., 2016 [81]Male and female C57Bl/6J mice
(8 weeks)
n = 10/group; M/F 1:1
Voluntary exercise protocol:
free access to a running wheel
(20 weeks)
Increased hippocampal Bdnf IV (quantitative RT-PCR) and total Bdnf mRNA (quantitative RT-PCR; only in males) expression; increased hippocampal mature BDNF protein expression (ELISA; only in males)
Wang and Wang, 2016 [85]Female Wistar rats
(8 weeks)
n = 10/group
Involuntary exercise protocols:
motorized treadmill exposure—
15–20–30 m/min; 40 min/day
(30 days)
Ameliorated spatial memory performance (Morris water maze test); increased hippocampal neurogenesis (immunohistochemistry)
Sun et al., 2017 [86]Male Sprague Dawley rats
(200 ± 20 g)
n = 8–16/group
Involuntary exercise protocols:
motorized treadmill exposure—
20 m/min; imposed until the rats showed fatigue, expressed as no response to electric stimulation
(7 days)
Ameliorated spatial learning performance (Y-maze active avoidance test);
suppressed induction and maintenance of hippocampal LTP (evocation and recording of the field excitatory postsynaptic potentials); increased hippocampal IL-1β, TNF-α, and iNOS expression (semiquantitative PCR); upregulated hippocampal levels of phosphorylated JNK (p-Jnk), phosphorylated p38 (p-p38), and phosphorylated ERK (p-Erk) (Western blot)
Xu et al., 2017 [87]Male C57BL/6J mice
(16 months)
n = 12–20/group
Voluntary exercise protocol:
free access to a running wheel
(60 min/day; 5 days/weeks; 5 months)
Ameliorated spatial learning and memory performance (Morris water maze test); increased density of hippocampal pyramidal cell dendritic spines (Golgi staining); prevented age-related loss of hippocampal postsynaptic density protein-95 (immunohistochemistry)
Chen et al., 2019 [78]Male C57BL/6J and Thy1-YFP transgenic mice
(4 weeks)
n = 4–8/group
Involuntary exercise protocols:
motorized treadmill exposure—
12 m/min; 60 min/day
(3 weeks)
Ameliorated motor learning performance (rotarod test);in motor cortex: increased mature BDNF protein, TrkB, phosphorylated mTor, phosphorylated ribosomal S6 protein, postsynaptic protein PSD95, vesicular protein SNAP25 expression (Western blot); inhibited elongation factor 4E-BP2 (Western blot); increased postsynaptic density lengths and thicknesses (electron microscopy); elevated the amplitude of miniature excitatory postsynaptic current in layer 5 pyramidal neurons (whole-cell patch-clamp recording); increased dendritic spine formation in layer 3 and 5 pyramidal neurons (in vivo imaging); increased axonal myelination (immunohistochemistry; electron microscopy)
O’Leary et al., 2019 [48]Male Sprague Dawley rats
(4/8 weeks)
n = 7–11/group
Voluntary exercise protocol:
free access to a running wheel
(7 weeks)
Increased hippocampal-dependent learning (fear and cued fear conditioning test; only after training initiated at 8 weeks of age);
increased hippocampal BDNF, synaptophysin, Creb, PSD-95, Arc, TLX, and DCX mRNA expression (quantitative RT-PCR; only after training initiated at 4 weeks of age); increased amygdalar synaptophysin mRNA expression (quantitative RT-PCR)
Li et al., 2021 [82]Male Wistar–Kyoto rats
(12 weeks)
n = 6–12/group
Voluntary exercise protocol:
free access to a running wheel
(8 weeks)
Ameliorated working memory performance (8-arm radial maze test); increased middle to high range frequency (6.5–12 Hz) of hippocampal theta power (24-h electrophysiological recording)
Note: unless otherwise specified, the described effects regard all the exercised groups.
Table 4. Studies on water activity effects on cognitive functions and neural substrates of healthy human subjects.
Table 4. Studies on water activity effects on cognitive functions and neural substrates of healthy human subjects.
AuthorsSample SizeDesignPhysical ExercisesCognitive/Behavioural EffectsBrain Effects
Water activity
Abou-Dest et al., 2012 [90]n = 48
M/F = 27/21
Age [mean ± SD] = 23.5 ± 2.5 years; 69.1 ± 3.8; 69.2 ± 3.2
Cross-sectional studySwimming (Duration = at least twice a week for at least 2 years)Increase in the executive functions assessed by SRT, CRT, Stop-signal task and Stroop test -
Sato et al., 2020 [91]n = 28
M/F = 18/10
Cross-sectional studySwimming-Positive association with intracortical inhibition in motor cortex assessed by TMS before and after water immersion
Carter et al., 2014 [94]n = 9
M/F = 9/0
Age [mean ± SD] = 24.6 ± 2.0 years;
Cross-sectional study with repeated measuresWater immersion-Increase in cerebral blood flow on middle and posterior cerebral artery by using a 2-MHz pulsed ST3 transcranial ultrasound system
Sato et al., 2013 [95]n = 15
M/F = 15/0
Age [mean ± SD] = 21.7 ± 0.4 years;
Cross-sectional study with repeated measuresWater immersion-Changes in sensorimotor integration assessed by TMS before during and after 15 min water immersion
Abbreviations: CRT = visual 2-choice Reaction Time test; SRT = auditory Simple Reaction Time; TMS = Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
Table 5. Studies on water activity effects on cognitive functions and neural substrates of healthy animals.
Table 5. Studies on water activity effects on cognitive functions and neural substrates of healthy animals.
ReferenceSample
(Age or Weight at the Start of Treatment)
Kind of Exercise
(Duration)
Effects on Cognitive Functions and Neural Substrates
(Evaluation Methodology)
Radák et al., 2001 [97]Male Wistar rats
(4 weeks/14 months)
n = 12–20/group
Swimming–60 min/day; 5 days/week
(6 weeks); then, 90 min/day; 5 days/week
(3 weeks)
Ameliorated active avoidance conditioning (pole-jumping conditioned avoidance behavior test); ameliorated short- and long-term memory (passive avoidance behavior test; only in 14-month-old rats); decreased brain protein carbonyl levels (spectrophotometric measurement and Western blot); increased brain chymotrypsin-like activity of proteasome complex (fluorometric measurement); increased brain DT-diaphorase activity (spectrophotometric measurement; only in 4-week-old rats)
Drumond et al., 2012 [98]Male Wistar rats
(150–200 g)
n = 5–15/group
Swimming–30 min/day; 5 days/week– with 60% of maximal supported load, previously determined
(8 weeks)
Ameliorated spatial short-term memory (object location test); increased hippocampal levels of Neuronal Calcium Sensor-1 (Western blot)
Alomari et al., 2013 [99]Male Wistar rats
(180–220 g)
n = 14–15/group
Swimming/rest protocol 5 min alternatively for 60 min/day; 5 days/week
(6 weeks)
Ameliorated spatial learning and short- and long-term memory (radial-arm water maze test); increased hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels (ELISA)
Alomari et al., 2021 [56]Male Wistar rats
(180–220 g)
n = 12/group
Swimming/rest protocol 5 min alternatively for 60 min/day; 5 days/week
(0, 1, 7, 14, or 28 days)
Ameliorated spatial learning and short- and long-term memory (radial-arm water maze test; only after 7, 14, and 28 days of exercise)
Note: unless otherwise specified, the described effects regard all the exercised groups.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Serra, L.; Petrosini, L.; Mandolesi, L.; Bonarota, S.; Balsamo, F.; Bozzali, M.; Caltagirone, C.; Gelfo, F. Walking, Running, Swimming: An Analysis of the Effects of Land and Water Aerobic Exercises on Cognitive Functions and Neural Substrates. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16310. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316310

AMA Style

Serra L, Petrosini L, Mandolesi L, Bonarota S, Balsamo F, Bozzali M, Caltagirone C, Gelfo F. Walking, Running, Swimming: An Analysis of the Effects of Land and Water Aerobic Exercises on Cognitive Functions and Neural Substrates. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(23):16310. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316310

Chicago/Turabian Style

Serra, Laura, Laura Petrosini, Laura Mandolesi, Sabrina Bonarota, Francesca Balsamo, Marco Bozzali, Carlo Caltagirone, and Francesca Gelfo. 2022. "Walking, Running, Swimming: An Analysis of the Effects of Land and Water Aerobic Exercises on Cognitive Functions and Neural Substrates" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 23: 16310. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316310

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop