Next Article in Journal
The Co-Application of PGPR and Biochar Enhances the Production Capacity of Continuous Cropping Peppers in the Karst Yellow Soil Region of Southwest China
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in Physicochemical Characteristics, Peel Color, and Juice Attributes of ‘Moro’ Blood Orange Fruit Treated with Glycine Betaine and Methyl Salicylate during Cold Quarantine Storage
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Horticulturae
Volume 9
Issue 10
10.3390/horticulturae9101105
horticulturae-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Overexpression of Cytosolic Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase 1 Gene Improves Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization in Potato

by
Jingrui Liu
1,†,
Jun Song
1,†,
Xiaoyu Zhuang
1,
Yifei Lu
1,
Qiang Wang
1,2,
Shimin Yang
1,
Liming Lu
1,
Xiyao Wang
1,2 and
Liqin Li
1,2,*
1
College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agriculture University, Chengdu 611130, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Exploration and Utilization in Southwest China, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Horticulturae 2023, 9(10), 1105; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9101105
Submission received: 20 August 2023 / Revised: 29 September 2023 / Accepted: 3 October 2023 / Published: 5 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Topic Recent Progress in Plant Nutrition Research and Plant Physiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Nitrogen is one of the most important elements for improving potato yield. However, excessive application of nitrogenous fertilizer not only produces river and other environmental pollution but also increases agricultural production costs. In recent years, to explain the molecular mechanisms of nitrogen metabolites, some vital genes involved have been reported; however, only limited success has been achieved in potato. Here, we report that the expression of cytosolic glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 1 (StGAPC1) is increased under low-nitrogen stress. StGAPC1-overexpressing potato seedlings had more biomass and a significant increase in total nitrogen content and root nitrate influx rate compared to the wild type. The overexpression of StGAPC1 also increased the expression of nitrate transporters and increased ROS system activity to reduce hydrogen peroxide content under low-nitrogen stress. Our results provide a foundation for further research on StGAPC1 function in nitrogen absorption and utilization mechanisms in potato.

1. Introduction

Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) are the world’s fourth largest food crop after rice, wheat, and corn, and have the advantages of strong adaptability, high yield, and rich nutritional value. Nitrogen (N) is one of the most important elements in plant nutrition, and its application plays a key role in improving crop yield. Although applying nitrogen fertilizer can improve crop yields, excessive application not only increases agricultural production costs, but also causes environmental pollution and ecological degradation [1,2]. Many studies have indicated that plants absorb nitrate (NO3−) and ammonium (NH4+) as the two main nitrogen forms [3], with the nitrate peptide transporter family/transporters (NPF/NRTs) playing a role in NO3− absorption and ammonium transporters (AMTs) absorbing NH4+ in roots [4,5]. In addition, NO3− and NH4+ are recognized as signalling molecules that interact with a variety of phytohormone signalling pathways to regulate N uptake, transport, and assimilation in plants [6]. Yang et al. reported that the N, potassium (K), phosphorus (P), sodium (Na), and iron (Fe) contents were reduced, meanwhile, magnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca), zinc (Zn), and copper (Cu) contents were increased in blueberry under nitrogen deficiency stress [7].
In recent years, some vital genes involved in N nutrition have been reported; for example, Dof daily fluctuations 1 (RDD1) improved N uptake and accumulation to increase grain productivity in rice [8]. Jia et al. reported that mild N deficiency induces key genes for BR biosynthesis; for example, the overexpression of DWF1 increases N accumulation to promote plant growth [9]. RNA-sequencing analysis results suggested that bHLH transcription factors, phosphatase 2C, sugar transporters, high-affinity nitrate transporters, proline-rich proteins, etc., probably play crucial roles in enhancing nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in potato [10]. In potato, differences in N metabolism among different varieties were found using transcriptome analysis of three potato cultivars, “Yanshu 4”, “Xiabodi”, and “Chunshu 4”. The upregulated DEGs in “Yanshu 4” related to N metabolism were closely related to N-utilization efficiency [11]. In rice, Luo et al. reported that the co-overexpression of genes for nitrogen transport, assimilation, and utilization improved rice grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency [12]. For example, the overexpression of an important ammonium transporter from flowering Chinese cabbage (BcAMT1;5) increased the NH4+ and NO3− contents compared to those in the wild type under low N concentrations. The findings indicate that BcAMT1;5 may be vital for the N metabolic process [13].
A previous study reported that cytosolic glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPC) mainly regulated the glycolysis process in the cytoplasm [14]. Further studies revealed that GAPC was vital for normal fertility and root development in Arabidopsis [15,16]. Anoman et al. reported that a lack of GAPCp activity influenced nitrogen, carbon, and mineral nutrition metabolism using transcriptomic and metabolomics analyses [17]. Interestingly, the downregulation activities of phosphorylating GAPC in transgenic potato also decreased the 3-phosphoglycerate content and increased the sucrose and UDP glucose content in leaves [18]. Liu et al. reported increased sucrose and glucose content in potato tubers, resulting in more and longer buds in StGAPC1 gene-silenced transgenic potato [19]. Further research suggested that the overexpression of StGAPC1 in potato delayed tuber sprouting [20]. Zhang et al. reported that reducing the use of N in field production significantly prolonged the dormancy period of tubers [21]. Therefore, these data indicate that N content is closely related to sprouting in potatoes, but few studies have reported the role of StGAPC1 in nitrogen nutrition in potatoes. Therefore, we wanted to explore whether StGAPC1 functions in the N absorption and assimilation processes in potato.
In our study, we found that the expression of StGAPC1 was inducible under N starvation. The overexpression of StGAPC1 promoted potato seedling growth and N accumulation under N starvation stress. Further research suggested that the overexpression of StGAPC1 increased the root nitrate influx rate and the expression of nitrate transporters. Finally, we report that the overexpression of StGAPC1 increases ROS system activity to reduce hydrogen peroxide content under N starvation stress, implying that StGAPC1 is a valuable candidate for developing crops with more efficient N use.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation and Detection of Transgenic Potato

The coding region of StGAPC1 (PGSC0003DMG400017433) was obtained using an RT-PCR experiment. Then, StGAPC1 was inserted into the PBI1221 vector with XbaⅠand SmaⅠendonucleases; the map of the constructed vector is provided in Figure S1. Then, the StGAPC1-PBI1221 vector was transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101. ‘Chuanyu 10’ potato cultivar plants were propagated in MS medium at 24 °C in a growth chamber under a 16 h light (100 μmol·m−2·s−1)/8 h dark cycle [22]. Microtubers with diameters of ~5 mm were cut into slices (~1–2 mm) to conduct gene transformation following a previously described method [22]. Three StGAPC1 transgenic potato lines were identified using real-time reverse transcription–PCR (qRT-PCR) experiments. The primers used in this study are listed in Table S1.

2.2. Potato Seedling Culture

Seedlings of the wild type (WT, Chuanyu 10) and the transgenic lines OE1, OE2, and OE3 were used in the hydroponic culture experiments. The seedling growth conditions and nutrient solution composition were described previously [23]. To analyse the expression patterns of StGAPC1 in response to nitrate, WT seedlings and transgenic potato lines (grown on MS medium for 20 d) were grown in nutrient solution that contained 1 mM Ca(NO3)2 (N-sufficient conditions) or 0.1 mM Ca(NO3)2 (low-N treatment, LN) for 15 d. The nutrient solution composition was described previously [24]. At least three replicates were used for each experiment. Seedlings from the WT and transgenic lines were obtained for physiological index measurements and gene expression analysis.

2.3. Measurement of Physiological Parameters and Enzyme Activity

Potato seedlings were collected and dried, and a semiautomated Kjeldahl method was used to measure the N content [24]. The activities of GS and NR were tested according to a previously described protocol [25]. The activities of POD and SOD were determined according to previously described methods [26,27]. H2O2 and superoxide anion radical (O2−) contents were determined according to a previously described method [28]. The GAPDH activity of seedlings was assayed according to the method described in [15].

2.4. Determination Method for Ion Flux Rate

The flux of NO3− and NH4+ in potato seedling tips was measured using a noninvasive micrometer system (NMT) according to a method described previously [29]. A nitrogen concentration of 1.44 mM NH4NO3 was used as a control, and 0.24 mM NH4NO3 was used as the low-nitrogen concentration. Each sample was measured for 10 min.

2.5. Real-Time Reverse Transcription–PCR Analysis of Gene Expression

Total RNA from potato seedlings was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Then, a reverse transcriptase kit (Thermo, Tokyo, Japan) was used to create cDNA. qRT-PCR experiments were conducted using a 7500 Real Time PCR System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The elongation factor gene in potato was used as an internal control, and the formula 2−ΔΔCt was used to calculate gene expression level.

2.6. Data Processing

In this study, all original data were obtained from at least three biological replicates. The data were analysed using SPSS 14.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) and Excel 2016 statistical software (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). Significant statistical differences between treatments were determined using One Way ANOWA (p ≤ 0.01 and p ≤ 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. StGAPC1 Is a Nitrate-Inducible Gene

Examining the expression patterns of StGAPC1 in different organs, the qRT-PCR experimental results suggested that the expression of StGAPC1 was higher in tuber pith and roots than in flowers and seedlings (Figure 1A). Then, the mRNA levels of StGAPC1 were determined under LN conditions ranging from 0 to 24 h in roots; the expression of StGAPC1 increased over time, reaching the highest level at 12 h (Figure 1B). Our results indicated that StGAPC1 was nitrate inducible.

3.2. Overexpression of StGAPC1 Promotes Seedling Growth under LN Stress

StGAPC1-overexpressing transgenic potatoes were obtained in our previous studies [20]. The expression levels of StGAPC1 and GAPDH activity were higher in the three selected transgenic seedlings than in the wild type (WT) (Figures S2 and S3). Then, the growth of the WT and transgenic lines in solution culture at the seedling stage was examined under N-sufficient and LN-stress conditions. Compared to the wild type, the three transgenic lines grew significantly better under both N-sufficient and LN conditions for 15 days (Figure 2A). At the same time, the three transgenic lines seedling had higher dry weights and N concentrations than the WT (Figure 2B,C). In summary, the transgenic lines grew better and had greater dry weights than the WT under both N-sufficient conditions and LN stress.

3.3. Overexpression of StGAPC1 Increases Enzyme Activity and Expression Level

To study the responses of transgenic lines to N concentration changes, seedlings of the WT and transgenic potato lines OE1, OE2, and OE3 were cultured in nutrient solution (N-sufficient conditions and LN conditions) for 15 days. First, the nitrate reductase (NR) and glutamine synthetase (GS) activities were obviously higher in the transgenic lines than in the WT under LN conditions; on the other hand, there were no significant differences between the transgenic lines and the WT under N-sufficient conditions (Figure 3A,B). Further analysis suggested that the expression levels of two enzymes were also increased in the transgenic lines compared to the WT under LN conditions. Similarly, there were no differences between the transgenic lines and the WT under N-sufficient conditions (Figure 3C,D). Therefore, it can be inferred that the StGAPC1-overexpressing transgenic seedlings were more adaptable to LN stress due to the promotion of NR and GS enzyme activity and gene expression level.

3.4. Overexpression of StGAPC1 Increases the Root NO3− Influx Rates

The noninvasive microtest technique (NMT) is widely used for the study of NO3− and NH4+ influx and efflux in plants. In our study, there was no significant difference in NO3− influx in the roots of the OE1 transgenic line and the WT under N-sufficient conditions (Figure 4A), but under LN conditions the NO3− influx of the transgenic lines increased obviously compared to that of the WT (Figure 4B). On the other hand, there was no significant difference in NH4+ efflux between the OE1 transgenic line and the WT under both N-sufficient conditions and LN stress (Figure 4C,D). The results indicated that the overexpression of StGAPC1 increased the uptake of NO3−, which coincided with the increased N content in transgenic line seedlings.

3.5. Overexpression of StGAPC1 Upregulates the Expression of Nitrate Transporters in Roots

Based on the above NO3− and NH4+ flux experimental results, we analysed the effects of overexpressing StGAPC1 on the expression of 10 nitrate transporter genes. The expression of NRT1.1, NRT2.1, NRT2.4, NRT2.5, NRT4.5, and NRT4.6 was obviously higher in the OE1 transgenic line compared to the WT under LN stress. In contrast, the expression of NRT1.5 and NRT2.7 was lower in the OE1 transgenic line root than the WT (Figure 5). Therefore, we concluded that the overexpression of StGAPC1 resulted in strong NO3− uptake, possibly due to the higher expression of the six NRT genes involved in nitrate transport.

3.6. Overexpressing StGAPC1 Increases ROS System Elimination

To study the effect of overexpressing StGAPC1 on the ROS system under LN stress, first, the seedlings of the WT and transgenic potato lines OE1, OE2, and OE3 were cultured in nutrient solution (N-sufficient conditions and LN conditions) for 15 days. Then, we measured the POD activity, SOD activity, and H2O2 and O2− contents. The results suggested that overexpressing StGAPC1 significantly increased the activity of SOD and POD (Figure 6A,B). On the other hand, the contents of both H2O2 and O2− in the transgenic lines were also decreased compared to those in the WT (Figure 6C,D). All the results demonstrated that overexpressing StGAPC1 increases antioxidant enzyme activity to reduce H2O2 and O2− accumulation under LN stress.

4. Discussion

Applying N fertilizer can significantly promote photosynthesis, increase dry matter accumulation, and significantly increase tuber yield [30]. Soualiou et al. reported that a high nitrogen treatment significantly improved maize photosynthesis under cold stress and enhanced the activity of nitrogen metabolism enzymes and nitrogen transport from roots to aboveground parts, therefore, promoting a significant increase in maize root and aboveground biomass compared to a low-nitrogen treatment [31]. Up to now, many important N-efficiency genes such as GRF4 and MYB61 and gene loci such as TCP19 and NAC42 have been identified in rice [32], but important N-efficiency genes in potato need further exploration.
Nishizawa et al. reported that cytosolic GAPDH had a role in cell death and interacted with ubiquitin ligase EL5 under high-nitrogen conditions to prevent root meristematic cell death [33]. Downregulated GAPCp activity affected nitrogen and carbon metabolism, especially glycerate and glutamine metabolites, and the ammonium assimilation pathway in Arabidopsis [14]. In this study, StGAPC1 was expressed in tuber pith, roots, flowers, and seedlings (Figure 1A). The expression of StGAPC1 increased continuously after the LN treatment, reaching its peak at 12 h in seedlings. After the LN treatment for 15 d, the StGAPC1-overexpressing lines had higher biomass and N concentration accumulation than the WT under N-sufficient conditions, but there was no significant difference between them under N-sufficient conditions (Figure 2A–C). The findings suggest that the overexpression of StGAPC1 can promote nitrogen accumulation, which may be similar to TaNAC2-5A as a positive regulator [24].
As key enzymes in the N assimilation process, nitrate reductase (NR) and glutamine synthetase (GS) activities were higher in the transgenic lines than in the WT under LN conditions (Figure 3A,B). Similarly, the expression levels of two enzymes were also increased in the transgenic lines compared to the WT under LN conditions (Figure 3C,D), suggesting that the overexpression of StGAPC1 enhances N assimilation under low-nitrogen stress, similar to PLDe function. Lu et al. reported that the overexpression of PLD lines increased the activity of nitrite reductase under nitrogen deficiency [34]. Khan et al. reported that transgenic rice overexpressing calcineurin B-like interacting protein kinase 2 (OsCIPK2) absorbed more NO3− and Ca2+ compared to the WT under LN [30]. Further research reported that the influx of NO3− increased significantly in the roots of the StGAPC1-overexpressing line compared to that in the roots of the WT plants under LN stress (Figure 4A,B). The results suggested that the upregulation of StGAPC1 expression promoted the uptake of NO3− in roots under LN conditions. A similar result was found for apple bHLH130 [35].
There are 39 StNRT gene members in the potato genome, and different members display different expression patterns in different tissues [36]. The transcript levels of eight TaNRTs were significantly increased after N starvation treatment in wheat [37]. In maize, the transcript expression of four N transporters was increased to promote N uptake after brassinosteroid treatment [38]. In rice, six N transporters (OsNRT1.1A, OsNRT1.1B, OsNPF6.1, OsNRT2.1, OsNRT2.3b, and OsNAR2.1) could increase N uptake and NUE [39]. Ma et al. reported that the expression of the OsNRT2s gene was regulated by ARE4 and exhibited a clear rhythmic pattern in response to the diurnal fluctuations of soluble sugar content, and nitrogen utilization was reduced in the are4 mutant, resulting in obvious defects in growth and development [40]. The expression of eight NRTs was higher in StGAPC1-overexpressing roots than in CK roots after 12 h of LN (Figure 5). These results suggested that StGAPC1 promoted the uptake of NO3− and NH4+ in roots through enhancing NRT function.
On the other hand, Krouk et al. reported that some N transporters transported hormones; for example, NPF6.3/NRT1.1 transported auxin in addition to transporting NO3− in Arabidopsis [41]. Four NO3− transporters had been found to transport abscisic acid in yeast or insect cells [42]. Similarly, NPF3 and NPF2.10 were reported to transport gibberellin in Arabidopsis [43]. Therefore, we speculated that the increased expression of NRT transporters in StGAPC1-overexpressing lines changed the auxin, ABA, and GA signalling pathways to improve low-nitrogen tolerance.
Previous studies suggested that LN stress promoted the accumulation of ROS, especially increased hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content [44]. Similarly, cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase 1 (CsAPX1) might, together with nitrogen regulatory protein P-II (CsGLB1), promote ascorbic acid accumulation compared to the WT under N deficiency solution condition in the tea plant [45]. In Arabidopsis, Chu et al. reported that transcription factor HOMOLOG OF BRASSINOSTEROID ENHANCED EXPRESSION2 INTERACTING WITH IBH1 (HBI1) was a vital regulator of nitrate signalling; meanwhile, it induced the expression levels of some antioxidant genes, then decreased the content of reactive oxygen species (ROS) under LN conditions [46].
Hancock et al. reported that GAPDH might also have a similar role in mediating ROS signalling, and H2O2 activated the interaction of GAPC and PLD to regulate growth and stress responses together in Arabidopsis [47]. In rice, the overexpression of the OsGAPC3 gene improved salt tolerance through increasing the activity of catalase and eliminating oxidative free radicals [48]. Zhang et al. found that the overexpression of TaGAPC1 promoted H2O2 detoxification to increase drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis [49]. The activities of POD and SOD were obviously higher in the StGAPC1 overexpression line seedlings than in the WT seedlings (Figure 6A,B), and in contrast, the contents of both H2O2 and O2− in the transgenic lines were also decreased compared to those in the WT (Figure 6CD), suggesting that the overexpression of StGAPC1 may contribute to enhanced ROS pathway function under LN stress.
Many studies had reported that GAPC and interacting proteins worked together in some important physiological processes. Han et al. reported that the overexpression of GAPCs inhibited autophagy in tobacco, and oxidative stress inhibited the interaction between GAPCs and autophagy-related protein 3 (ATG3) [50]. Zhang et al. reported that glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) interacted with OsSRT1 to regulate cell redox states and that OsSRT1 depressed GAPDH lysine acetylation and nuclear accumulation under oxidative stress in rice [51]. In potato, StGAPC1 interacted with snakin-2 to decrease its oxidative modification to inhibit sprout growth [20]. Summarising the above results, we speculate that StGAPC1 may interact with some proteins to regulate N nutrition pathways. GAPC also plays a role in gene transcription regulation, and GAPDH directly regulates the transcriptional activation function of a series of glycolytic enzyme-encoding genes in rice [51]. Kim et al. reported that in Arabidopsis, AtGAPC bound to the transcription factor NF-YC10 to induce the expression of heat-tolerance genes and enhance plant heat tolerance [52]. We believe that StGAPC1 may directly regulate the genes involved in N absorption and assimilation, which requires more research in the future.

5. Conclusions

The results of this study indicated that the expression of StGAPC1 was increased after low-nitrogen treatment. The StGAPC1-overexpressing transgenic potato seedlings had higher shoot and root dry weights than the WT potato seedlings after LN treatment for 15 days. Meanwhile, the transgenic potato seedlings also had higher N accumulation, NR and GS enzyme activity, and nitrate transporter expression. In addition, the activity of SOD and POD increased; in contrast, the contents of H2O2 and O2− were also decreased after the low-nitrogen treatment in the transgenic lines. In summary, our study provides a foundation for the thorough analysis of StGAPC1 function in potato N signalling pathways and improving the utilization rates of potato N fertilizer.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/horticulturae9101105/s1, Figure S1: The map of constructed vector; Figure S2: Expression level analysis of StGAPC1 in transgenic lines; Figure S3: The activity analysis of GAPDH in transgenic lines; Table S1: The primer sequences of ten genes.

Author Contributions

L.L. (Liqin Li) wrote the first draft of the manuscript; J.L., J.S. and X.Z. performed the experiments; Y.L. and S.Y. analysed the data; Q.W. and L.L. (Liming Lu) edited the manuscript; X.W. amended the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was funded by the Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (Program No. 2022NSFSC0178) and the State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Exploration and Utilization in Southwest China (SKL-ZY202217).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ladha, J.K.; Tirolpadre, A.; Reddy, C.K.; Cassman, K.G.; Verma, S.; Powlson, D.S.; van Kessel, C.; Richter, D.D.B.; Chakraborty, D.; Pathak, H. Global nitrogen budgets in cereals: A 50-year assessment for maize, rice, and wheat production systems. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bobbink, R.; Hicks, K.; Galloway, J.; Spranger, T.; Alkemade, R.; Ashmore, M.; Cinderby, S.; Davidson, E.; Dentener, F.; Emmett, B.; et al. Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: A synthesis. Ecol. Appl. 2010, 20, 30–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Chen, K.; Tsay, Y. Nitrate transport, signaling, and use efficiency. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2018, 69, 85–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. O’Brien, J.A.A.; Vega, A.; Bouguyon, E.; Krouk, G.; Gojon, A.; Coruzzi, G.; Gutiérrez, R.A.A. Nitrate transport, sensing, and responses in plants. Mol. Plant. 2016, 9, 837–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, Y.; Von, W.N. Ammonium as a signal for physiological and morphological responses in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2581–2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lam, H.M.; Coschigano, K.T.; Oliveira, I.C.; Melo-Oliveira, R.; Coruzzi, G.M. The molecular-genetics of nitrogen assimilation into amino acids in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1996, 47, 569–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yang, H.Y.; Duan, Y.K.; Wu, Y.Q.; Zhang, C.H.; Wu, W.L.; Lyu, L.F.; Li, W.L. Physiological and transcriptional responses of carbohydrate and nitrogen metabolism and ion balance in blueberry plants under nitrogen deficiency. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 101, 519–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Iwamoto, M.; Tagiri, K. MicroRNA-targeted transcription factor gene RDD1 promotes nutrient ion uptake and accumulation in rice. Plant J. 2016, 85, 466–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jia, Z.; Giehl, R.F.H. The root foraging response under low nitrogen depends on DWARF1-mediated brassinosteroid biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2020, 183, 998–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tiwari, J.K.; Buckseth, T.; Devi, S.; Varshney, S.; Sahu, S.; Patil, V.U.; Zinta, R.; Ali, N.; Moudgil, V.; Singh, R.K.; et al. Physiological and genome-wide RNA-sequencing analyses identify candidate genes in a nitrogen-use efficient potato cv. Kufri Gaurav. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 154, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, J.Y.; Wang, Y.P.; Zhao, Y.F.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.Y.; Ma, H.R.; Han, Y.Z. Transcriptome analysis reveals Nitrogen deficiency induced alterations in leaf and root of three cultivars of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0240662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Luo, J.; Hang, J.N.; Wu, B.L.; Wei, X.L.; Zhao, Q.Z.; Fang, Z.M. Co-overexpression of genes for nitrogen transport, assimilation, and utilization boosts rice grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency. Crop J. 2023, 3, 785–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhu, Y.N.; Zhong, L.H.; Huang, X.M.; Su, W.; Liu, H.C.; Sun, G.W.; Song, S.W.; Chen, R.Y. BcAMT1;5 mediates nitrogen uptake and assimilation in flowering Chinese cabbage and improves plant growth when overexpressed in Arabidopsis. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rius, S.P.; Casati, P.; Iglesias, A.A.; Gomez, C.D.F. Characterization of an Arabidopsis thaliana mutant lacking a cytosolic non-phosphorylating glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 61, 945–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rius, S.P.; Casati, P.; Iglesias, A.A.; Gomez, C.D.F. Characterization of Arabidopsis lines deficient in GAPC-1, a cytosolic NAD-dependent glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148, 1655–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Munoz., B.J.; Cascales, M.B.; Mulet, J.M.; Baroja, F.E.; Pozueta, R.J.; Kuhn, J.M.; Segura, J.; Ros, R. Plastidial glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency leads to altered root development and affects the sugar and amino acid balance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151, 541–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Anoman, A.D.; Muñoz, B.J.; Rosa, T.S.; Tornero, M.F.; Serrano, R.; Bueso, E.; Fernie, A.R.; Segura, J.; Ros, R. Plastidial glycolytic glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase is an important determinant in the carbon and nitrogen metabolism of heterotrophic cells in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 1619–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hajirezaei, M.M.; Peisker, S.; Peisker, M.; Lytovchenko, A.; Fernie, A.R.; Sonnewald, U. The influence of cytosolic phosphorylating glyceraldehyde3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPC) on potato tuber metabolism. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 2363–2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, T.F.; Fang, H.; Liu, J.; Reid, S.; Hou, J.; Zhou, T.T.; Tian, Z.D.; Song, B.T.; Xie, C.H. Cytosolic glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenases play crucial roles in controlling cold-induced sweetening and apical dominance of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 3043–3054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, L.Q.; Lyu, C.C.; Chen, J.; Lu, Y.F.; Yng, S.M.; Ni, S.; Zheng, S.L.; Yu, L.P.; Wang, X.Y.; Wang, Q.; et al. Snakin-2 interacts with cytosolic glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 1 to inhibit sprout growth in potato tubers. Hortic. Res. 2022, 9, uhab060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, H.; Liu, X.; Nie, B.; Song, B.; Du, P.; Liu, S.; Li, L.; Zhao, Z. Nitrogen management can inhibit or induce the sprouting of potato tubers: Consequences of regulation tuberization. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2022, 183, 111722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, X.Y.; Li, J.; Zou, X.; Lu, L.M.; Li, L.Q.; Ni, S.; Liu, F. Ectopic expression of AtCIPK23 enhances tolerance against low-K+ stress in transgenic potato. Am. J. Potato Res. 2010, 88, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ren, Y.Z.; He, X.; Liu, D.C.; Li, J.J.; Zhao, X.Q.; Li, B.; Tong, Y.P.; Zhang, A.M.; Li, Z.S. Major quantitative trait loci for seminal root morphology of wheat seedlings. Mol Breed. 2012, 30, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. He, X.; Qu, B.Y.; Li, W.J.; Zhao, X.Q.; Teng, W.; Ma, W.Y.; Ren, Y.Z.; Li, B.; Li, Z.S.; Tong, Y.P. The nitrate-inducible NAC transcription factor TaNAC2-5A controls nitrate response and increases wheat yield. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 1991–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yu, X.Z.; Zhang, F.Z. Activities of nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase in rice seedlings during cyanide metabolism. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 225, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, C.M.; Shi, S.L. Physiological and proteomic responses of contrasting alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) varieties to PEG-induced osmotic stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Dong, T.; Shi, J.; Jiang, C.Z.; Feng, Y.; Cao, Y.; Wang, Q. A short-term carbon dioxide treatment inhibits the browning of fresh-cut burdock. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2015, 110, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, D.; Ma, N.; Liu, Z.; Ma, X.; Zhao, S.; Meng, Q. Suppression of tomato SlGGP aggravates methyl viologen-mediated oxidative stress. Biol. Plant. 2016, 60, 677–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Khan, M.U.; Li, P.H.; Amjad, H.; Khan, A.Q.; Arafat, Y.; Waqas, M.; Li, Z.; Noman, A.; Islam, W.; Wu, L.K.; et al. Exploring the potential of overexpressed OsCIPK2 rice as a nitrogen utilization efficient crop and analysis of its associated rhizo-compartmental microbial communities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kumar, P.; Pandey, S.K.; Singh, B.P.; Singh, S.V.; Kumar, D. Effect of N rate on growth, yield, economics and crisps quality of Indian potato processing cultivars. Potato Res. 2007, 50, 143–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Soualiou, S.; Duan, F.Y.; Li, X.; Zhou, W.B. Nitrogen supply alleviates cold stress by increasing photosynthesis and nitrogen assimilation in maize seedlings. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 74, 3142–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hu, B.; Wang, W.; Chen, J.J.; Liu, Y.Q.; Chu, C.C. Genetic improvement toward nitrogen-use efficiency in rice: Lessons and perspectives. Mol. Plant 2023, 1, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Nishizawa, Y.; Mochizuki, S.; Koiwai, H.; Kondo, K.; Kishimoto, K.; Katoh, E.; Minami, E. Rice ubiquitin ligase EL5 prevents root meristematic cell death under high nitrogen conditions and interacts with a cytosolic GAPDH. Plant Signal. Behav. 2015, 10, e990801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lu, S.P.; Yao, S.B.; Wang, G.L.; Guo, L.; Zhou, Y.M.; Hong, Y.Y.; Wang, X.M. Phospholipase De enhances Braasca napus growth and seed production in response to nitrogen availability. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2016, 14, 926–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, X.N.; Chai, X.F.; Gao, B.B.; Deng, C.L.; Günther, C.S.; Wu, T.; Zhang, X.Z.; Xu, X.F.; Han, Z.H.; Wang, Y. Multiple-omics reveal the role of transcription factor bHLH130 during low nitrogen in apple. Plant Physiol. 2023, 191, 1305–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhang, J.Y.; Han, Z.J.; Lu, Y.; Zhao, Y.F.; Wang, Y.P.; Zhang, J.Y.; Ma, H.R.; Han, Y.Z. Genome-wide identification, structural and gene expression analysis of the nitrate transporters (NRTs) family in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). PLoS ONE 2021, 21, 0257383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Guo, T.C.; Xuan, H.M.; Yang, Y.Y.; Wang, L.N.; Wei, L.T.; Wang, Y.H.; Kang, G.Z. Transcription analysis of genes encoding the wheat root transporter NRT1 and NRT2 families during nitrogen starvation. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 33, 837–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xing, J.P.; Wang, Y.B.; Yao, Q.Q.; Zhang, Y.S.; Zhang, M.C.; Li, Z.H. Brassinosteroids modulate nitrogen physiological response and promote nitrogen uptake in maize (Zea mays L.). Crop J. 2022, 1, 166–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, Q.; Wu, K.; Song, W.Z.; Zhong, N.; Wu, Y.Z.; Fu, X.D. Improving crop nitrogen use efficiency toward sustainable green revolution. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2022, 73, 523–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ma, X.H.; Nian, J.Q.; Yu, H.; Zhang, F.X.; Feng, T.P.; Kou, L.Q.; Zhang, J.; Wang, D.F.; Li, H.W.; Cheng, L.C.; et al. Link glucose signaling to nitrogen utilization by the OsHXK7-ARE4 complex in rice. Dev. Cell. 2023, 58, 1489–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Krouk, G.; Lacombe, B.; Bielach, A.; Walker, F.P.; Malinska, K.; Mounier, E.; Hoyerova, K.; Tillard., P.; Leon, S.; Ljung, K.; et al. Nitrate-regulated auxin transport by NRT1.1 defines a mechanism for nutrient sensing in plants. Dev. Cell. 2010, 18, 927–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kanno, Y.; Hanada, A.; Chiba, Y.; Ichikawa, T.; Nakazawa, M.; Matsui, M.; Koshiba, T.; Kamiya, Y.; Seo, M. Identification of an abscisic acid transporter by functional screening using the receptor complex as a sensor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 9653–9658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Tal, I.; Zhang, Y.; Jørgensen, M.E.; Pisanty, O.; Barbosa, I.C.R.; Zourelidou, M.; Regnault, T.; Crocoll, C.; Olsen, C.E.; Weinstain, R.; et al. The Arabidopsis NPF3 protein is a GA transporter. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Safi, A.; Medici, A.; Szponarski, W.; Marshall-Colon, A.; Ruffel, S.; Gaymard, F.; Coruzzi, G.; Lacombe, B.; Krouk, G. GARP transcription factors and reactive oxygen species are regulators of Arabidopsis nitrogen starvation response. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 3881–3901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Li, H.; Liu, H.; Wang, Y.; Teng, R.M.; Liu, J.Y.; Lin, S.J.; Zhuang, J. Cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase 1 modulates ascorbic acid metabolism through cooperating with nitrogen regulatory protein P-II in tea plant under nitrogen deficiency stress. Genomics 2020, 112, 3497–3503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chu, X.Q.; Wang, J.G.; Li, M.Z.; Zhang, S.J.; Gao, Y.Y.; Fan, M.; Han, C.; Xiang, F.N.; Li, G.Y.; Wang, Y.; et al. HBI transcription factor-mediated ROS homeostasis regulates nitrate signal transduction. Plant Cell 2021, 33, 3004–3021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hancock, J.T.; Henson, D.; Nyirenda, M.; Desikan, R.; Harrison, J.; Lewis, M.; Hughes, J.; Neill, S.J. Proteomic identification of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase as an inhibitory target of hydrogen peroxide in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2005, 43, 828–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, X.H.; Rao, X.L.; Shi, H.T.; Li, R.J.; Lu, Y.T. Overexpression of a cytosolic glyceraldehyde-3-phosphatedehydrogenase gene OsGAPC3 confers salt tolerance in rice. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 2011, 107, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, L.; Xu, Z.Y.; Ji, H.K.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, S.S. TaWRKY40 transcription factor positively regulate the expression of TaGAPC1 to enhance drought tolerance. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Han, S.J.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, X.Y.; Jia, Q.; Zhao, J.P.; Bai, F.; Hong, Y.G.; Liu, Y.L. Cytoplastic glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenases interact with ATG3 to negatively regulate autophagy and immunity in nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Cell. 2015, 27, 1318–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, D.X. Rice NAD+-dependent histone deacetylase OsSRT1 represses glycolysis and regulates the moonlighting function of GAPDH as a transcriptional activator of glycolytic genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, 12241–12255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kim, S.C.; Guo, L.; Wang, X. Nuclear moonlighting of cytosolic glyceraldehyde-3-dehydrogenase regulates Arabidopsis response to heat stress. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Horticulturae 09 01105 g001
Figure 1. Expression pattern analysis of StGAPC1 in organs and under LN conditions. (A) Expression of StGAPC1 in different organs of potato plants. (B) StGAPC1 expression was increased in roots under LN stress. Potato seedlings were grown in nutrient solutions that contained 0.2 mM nitrate (low N) for 3, 6, 12, and 24 h, and nutrient solutions that contained 2 mM nitrate (N-sufficient conditions) were used as controls (0 h). The data are the means ± SEs of three replicates. Different lowercase letters represent a significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Expression pattern analysis of StGAPC1 in organs and under LN conditions. (A) Expression of StGAPC1 in different organs of potato plants. (B) StGAPC1 expression was increased in roots under LN stress. Potato seedlings were grown in nutrient solutions that contained 0.2 mM nitrate (low N) for 3, 6, 12, and 24 h, and nutrient solutions that contained 2 mM nitrate (N-sufficient conditions) were used as controls (0 h). The data are the means ± SEs of three replicates. Different lowercase letters represent a significant difference at p < 0.05.
Horticulturae 09 01105 g001
Horticulturae 09 01105 g002
Figure 2. Plant growth and dry weight analysis of the wild type and transgenic lines. (A) Seedlings of the WT and the transgenic lines (OE1, OE2, and OE3) grown under N-sufficient conditions and LN conditions. (B) Dry weight of seedlings. (C) N concentration of seedlings. Different lowercase letters represent a significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Plant growth and dry weight analysis of the wild type and transgenic lines. (A) Seedlings of the WT and the transgenic lines (OE1, OE2, and OE3) grown under N-sufficient conditions and LN conditions. (B) Dry weight of seedlings. (C) N concentration of seedlings. Different lowercase letters represent a significant difference at p < 0.05.
Horticulturae 09 01105 g002
Horticulturae 09 01105 g003
Figure 3. Analysis of enzyme activity and expression level of the transgenic lines. (A) NR activity of seedlings; (B) GS activity of seedlings; (C) NR expression level in seedlings; (D) GS expression level in seedlings. WT means wild type, OE1–OE3 means the transgenic lines. The data are the means ± SEs of three replicates. Different lowercase letters represent a significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Analysis of enzyme activity and expression level of the transgenic lines. (A) NR activity of seedlings; (B) GS activity of seedlings; (C) NR expression level in seedlings; (D) GS expression level in seedlings. WT means wild type, OE1–OE3 means the transgenic lines. The data are the means ± SEs of three replicates. Different lowercase letters represent a significant difference at p < 0.05.
Horticulturae 09 01105 g003
Horticulturae 09 01105 g004
Figure 4. NO3− and NH4+ fluxes of potato roots under different N concentration treatments. (A) NO3− flux under N-sufficient conditions; (B) NO3− flux under LN conditions; (C) NH4+ flux under N−sufficient conditions; (D) NH4+ flux under LN conditions. A positive value indicates efflux, a negative value indicates influx. WT means wild type; OE1 means the transgenic lines.
Figure 4. NO3− and NH4+ fluxes of potato roots under different N concentration treatments. (A) NO3− flux under N-sufficient conditions; (B) NO3− flux under LN conditions; (C) NH4+ flux under N−sufficient conditions; (D) NH4+ flux under LN conditions. A positive value indicates efflux, a negative value indicates influx. WT means wild type; OE1 means the transgenic lines.
Horticulturae 09 01105 g004
Horticulturae 09 01105 g005
Figure 5. Expression analysis of nitrate transporters in transgenic plants. WT means wild type; OE1 means the transgenic lines. Different lowercase letters represent a significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Expression analysis of nitrate transporters in transgenic plants. WT means wild type; OE1 means the transgenic lines. Different lowercase letters represent a significant difference at p < 0.05.
Horticulturae 09 01105 g005
Horticulturae 09 01105 g006
Figure 6. Effect of StGAPC1 overexpression on the ROS system. (A) SOD activity; (B) POD activity; (C) H2O2 content; (D) O2− content. WT means wild type, OE1–OE3 means the transgenic lines. Different lowercase letters represent a significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 6. Effect of StGAPC1 overexpression on the ROS system. (A) SOD activity; (B) POD activity; (C) H2O2 content; (D) O2− content. WT means wild type, OE1–OE3 means the transgenic lines. Different lowercase letters represent a significant difference at p < 0.05.
Horticulturae 09 01105 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, J.; Song, J.; Zhuang, X.; Lu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Yang, S.; Lu, L.; Wang, X.; Li, L. Overexpression of Cytosolic Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase 1 Gene Improves Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization in Potato. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9101105

AMA Style

Liu J, Song J, Zhuang X, Lu Y, Wang Q, Yang S, Lu L, Wang X, Li L. Overexpression of Cytosolic Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase 1 Gene Improves Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization in Potato. Horticulturae. 2023; 9(10):1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9101105

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Jingrui, Jun Song, Xiaoyu Zhuang, Yifei Lu, Qiang Wang, Shimin Yang, Liming Lu, Xiyao Wang, and Liqin Li. 2023. "Overexpression of Cytosolic Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase 1 Gene Improves Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization in Potato" Horticulturae 9, no. 10: 1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9101105

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop