Next Article in Journal
The CRISPR/Cas System: A Customizable Toolbox for Molecular Detection
Previous Article in Journal
An in Silico Approach to Identifying TF Binding Sites: Analysis of the Regulatory Regions of BUSCO Genes from Fungal Species in the Ceratocystidaceae Family
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

A Complex Intrachromosomal Rearrangement Disrupting IRF6 in a Family with Popliteal Pterygium and Van der Woude Syndromes

by
Alya A. Al-Kurbi
1,2,†,
Elbay Aliyev
2,†,
Sana AlSa’afin
1,
Waleed Aamer
2,
Sasirekha Palaniswamy
2,
Aljazi Al-Maraghi
2,
Houda Kilani
3,
Ammira Al-Shabeeb Akil
2,
Mitchell A. Stotland
3,4 and
Khalid A. Fakhro
1,2,5,*
1
College of Health and Life Sciences, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha 34110, Qatar
2
Department of Human Genetics, Sidra Medicine, Doha 26999, Qatar
3
Division of Plastic and Craniofacial Surgery, Sidra Medicine, Doha 26999, Qatar
4
Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, Doha 24144, Qatar
5
Department of Genetic Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Doha 24144, Qatar
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Genes 2023, 14(4), 849; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14040849
Submission received: 12 February 2023 / Revised: 26 March 2023 / Accepted: 28 March 2023 / Published: 31 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Human Genomics and Genetic Diseases)

Abstract

:
Clefts of the lip and/or palate (CL/P) are considered the most common form of congenital anomalies occurring either in isolation or in association with other clinical features. Van der woude syndrome (VWS) is associated with about 2% of all CL/P cases and is further characterized by having lower lip pits. Popliteal pterygium syndrome (PPS) is a more severe form of VWS, normally characterized by orofacial clefts, lower lip pits, skin webbing, skeletal anomalies and syndactyly of toes and fingers. Both syndromes are inherited in an autosomal dominant manner, usually caused by heterozygous mutations in the Interferon Regulatory Factor 6 (IRF6) gene. Here we report the case of a two-generation family where the index presented with popliteal pterygium syndrome while both the father and sister had clinical features of van der woude syndrome, but without any point mutations detected by re-sequencing of known gene panels or microarray testing. Using whole genome sequencing (WGS) followed by local de novo assembly, we discover and validate a copy-neutral, 429 kb complex intra-chromosomal rearrangement in the long arm of chromosome 1, disrupting the IRF6 gene. This variant is copy-neutral, novel against publicly available databases, and segregates in the family in an autosomal dominant pattern. This finding suggests that missing heritability in rare diseases may be due to complex genomic rearrangements that can be resolved by WGS and de novo assembly, helping deliver answers to patients where no genetic etiology was identified by other means.

1. Introduction

Orofacial clefts (OFC), specifically, clefts of the lip and/or the palate (CL/P), are among the most common form of congenital craniofacial anomalies affecting about 1 in 500 to 1 in 2500 births depending on the population [1,2]. The majority of cleft lip and palate cases occur as a non-syndromic isolated phenotype with complex disease etiology, while about 30% of cases are syndromic occurring in association with other mendelian phenotypes [1,2]. Previous studies have shown that both genetic and environmental factors contribute to the cause of orofacial clefts making it difficult to identify the main etiology in many cases; however, it was also shown that many of the syndromic cases of CL/P were due to chromosomal abnormalities and/or monogenic causes [3].
Currently, more than 500 syndromes have been found to be associated with syndromic CL/P, with Van der Woude syndrome (VWS, OMIM 119300) being the most common, accounting for about 2% of all CL/P cases [4,5]. VWS is dominantly inherited and characterized by orofacial clefts with additional phenotypes including lower lip pits and hypodontia in some cases [5,6]. Like VWS, Popliteal Pterygium Syndrome (PPS, OMIM 119500) is an autosomal dominant condition also characterized by orofacial clefts, lower lip pits with additional features including genital and skeletal anomalies, skin webbing, and syndactyly of toes or fingers [5,6]. PPS is considered a more serious form of VWS with popliteal webbing, CL/P, and syndactyly used as key clinical differentiators occurring in more than half of all PPS cases [4,7]. Both VWS and PPS are very rare occurring in about 1 in 35,000 and 1 in 300,000 births respectively, and both are reported to be caused by mutations in the Interferon Regulatory Factor 6 gene (IRF6, OMIM 607199) [4,5].
Structural variants (SVs) are a class of genomic variation that are larger than 50 base pairs in size and account for about 1% of differences in terms of base content across human populations [8]. SVs may be simple deletions and duplications (together referred to as copy number variants (CNVs)) or complex events, including inversions, insertions, and translocations, all of which may either be balanced or unbalanced and/or co-occur with CNVs, in some cases involving three or more breakpoints [9]. Like other classes of genomic variation, SVs can be either benign or disease-causing, where they lead to gene disruption or gene dosage alterations [8]. Previous studies have reported complex SVs in patients with different Mendelian disorders; for instance, an inverted triplicated segment within a duplication was found at MECP2 and PLP1 gene loci in patients with Lubs syndrome and Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease [9,10]. Additionally, recent studies reported the association of complex structural variants with neuropsychiatric conditions and ASD [9]. Despite these discoveries, the true prevalence of complex SVs in Mendelian disorders remain poorly understood due to the analytical and technical challenges of both discovering and interpreting such variants from short read data analysis pipelines, which are typically used in both whole exome (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) today [9].
Recent improvements in variant identification tools, and in particular the development of more sensitive and specific algorithms for SV discovery, have aided the effort to identify and understand complex structural variations from short or long DNA fragments [11,12]. Once identified, de novo assembly of genomic regions of interest may help resolve difficult regions and understand their role of complex SVs in Mendelian disease [13,14].
Here, we describe the use of WGS on a family with both VWS and PPS who were initially negative by clinical WES, but in whom we use WGS with combined SV tools to identify and validate a novel complex intrachromosomal rearrangement on chromosome 1 disrupting the IRF6 protein. We believe such approaches could be generalized to other pediatric syndromic disorders that are exome-negative but for which WGS data can be generated and where orthogonal SV detection approaches may help identify genetic etiology.

2. Detailed Case Description

The index patient is a female 2nd child to non-consanguineous parents. She presented to the Plastics and Craniofacial clinic at 17 months of age and was diagnosed with Popliteal Pterygium syndrome (PPS). She had bilateral cleft lip (complete on the left, incomplete on the right) and cleft palate (both were repaired elsewhere) with large residual anterior fistula (Figure 1B). She also had lower lip pits and cysts on both sides, right popliteal pterygium, and bilateral complete simple syndactyly of second and third webspace of the hands (only nail plates fused were on the right-hand 3rd–4th digits) (Figure 1C–E). She was otherwise developmentally normal, had normal intelligence, normal cardiovascular and respiratory system, with no other anomalies or medical conditions noted. The older sister presented to our institution at 38 months of age with bilateral cleft lip and cleft palate (both repaired elsewhere) with large residual anterior fistula and had lower lip pits and cysts on both sides consistent with the diagnosis of van der woude syndrome (VWS) (Figure 1F). Similarly, the father -39 years old- also showed clinical features of VWS, having bilateral cleft lip (repaired elsewhere), unrepaired cleft of the entire secondary palate, and lower lip pits and cysts (Figure 1G). Both the father and the older sister were otherwise normal, with no other anomalies or medical conditions noted. Sanger sequencing of the IRF6 gene revealed no candidate pathogenic variants, prompting enrollment into the Qatari Mendelian Disease Program, where whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed for the entire family.

3. Results

The family was first referred with a suspicion of PPS and VWS, however routine pathology investigation, including re-sequencing of known gene panels and microarray testing, found no pathogenic variants in IRF6—a known candidate gene causing both conditions–segregating with disease in this family. The family was thus enrolled for WGS as part of the Qatar Mendelian Disease Program [15], to identify a genetic etiology for their clinical phenotype. All family members were enrolled by informed consent, and their genomes were sequenced to a minimum depth of 30×, and data was processed to identify rare, putatively pathogenic variants segregating with disease (for details see Appendix A). The WGS analysis revealed no immediate candidate pathogenic variants in the sub−50 bp range (single nucleotide variants or insertions/deletions (INDELS)). We therefore employed an in-house structural variant discovery pipeline (see Appendix A), to look for possible chromosomal abnormalities that could be causing the phenotype.
Among 136 deletion, duplication, and inversion events shared by affected family members (Figure 2), we detected a copy-neutral rearrangement segregating in affected family members on the long arm of chromosome 1 (1q32.2) that appeared to overlap the IRF6 gene. This event was captured by our analysis pipeline as two consecutive deletions, 177 kb and 251 kb, that were both encompassed by a larger 429 kb duplication event (Figure 3). To further resolve the possible rearrangement event, we selected all reads within 500 kb window upstream and downstream of the putative breakpoints and proceeded with de novo assembly of short-read data at this locus. This approach revealed a rearranged allele in which the sequence of the two candidate ‘deleted’ segments originally detected were in fact reversed in order along the same chromosome, i.e., a deletion of the upstream segment and re-insertion of this first segment downstream of the second segment. Notably, the breakpoints identified from the de novo assembly suggested that exon 6 of the IRF6 gene was disrupted (Figure 4A). By comparison to publicly available as well as internal Qatari structural variation data [16], this variant appeared to be novel, and was shared among the 3 affected family members, and absent from the unaffected mother and sibling, and thus consistent with autosomal dominant disease etiology.
We then proceeded to validate this rearrangement in the lab. To do this, we designed 3 sets of primers around the rearranged breakpoints (Figure A1). We amplified these genomic segments using PCR, and found the reference allele in all family members. While unaffected members were homozygous for the reference allele, the 3 affected members were heterozygous for it, alongside the rearranged allele as predicted from the in silico analysis (Figure 4A,B).

4. Discussion and Conclusions

In this paper, we present a two-generation family with an intrafamilial phenotypic variability who were found to have a complex rearrangement event on chromosome 1 disrupting the continuity of the IRF6 gene. The index patient was diagnosed with popliteal pterygium syndrome, while the father and the sister showed clinical features of van der woude syndrome, both of which are caused by mutations in the IRF6 gene.
Both popliteal pterygium and van der woude syndromes are dominantly inherited and mainly characterized by orofacial clefts. In popliteal pterygium syndrome, the most common feature present in more than 90% of cases is cleft palate with/without cleft lip and it includes additional cutaneous, genital, and musculoskeletal phenotypes such as popliteal skin webbing occurring in 58% of cases, genital anomalies in 37%, syndactyly in 50% and nail anomalies in 33% of cases, and any three of these phenotypes must be present for the diagnosis of PPS [17]. On the other hand, in addition to the cleft lip and/or palate, lower lip pits must be present in order to be diagnosed with van der woude syndrome [4].
Previously, Tan et al. reported a de novo 2.3 Mb microdeletion of 1q32.2 region involving the IRF6 gene in a patient diagnosed with van der woude syndrome [6]. Upon searching the literature, no cases with complex structural variants involving the IRF6 gene locus were found the variant in this family was a highly complex rearrangement that did not affect exonic sequence, and would therefore be missed using routine targeted and/or exome sequencing approaches. While it is known that families with IRF6 mutations can have significant inter- and intra- familial phenotypic variability, such cases are normally seen in families with point mutations in IRF6, no previous cases were reported with such complex intrachromosomal rearrangement event [18]. Further, the wide phenotype diversity seen in the previously described and current cases, supports the idea that the two syndromes, VWS and PPS, represent two ends of a phenotypic spectrum of a single condition rather than two separate disorders [18].
The use of WGS offers the ability to detect a multitude of genomic variants ranging from simple base-substitutions to complex rearrangements, including copy number changes, as well as copy-neutral inversions and translocations [19]. However, a major challenge remains accurately analyzing, filtering, and interpreting WGS data to identify such variants [19]. In this study, we identified variants on chromosome 1 that by traditional tools suggested 2 successive deletions overlapping a duplication. This prompted further analysis to resolve this variant. We therefore leverage de novo local genome assembly as a powerful approach to reconstruct the allele from the ground up. This approach revealed a complex intra-chromosomal translocation, where one genomic segment was removed and re-inserted downstream of its neighboring segment on the 1q32.2 region. This rearrangement affecting exon 6, disrupting the continuity of the IRF6 gene, and causing the dominantly inherited phenotypes observed in this family.
In the human genome, structural variants (SVs) are considered a significant source of variation, and it was shown that complex structural variants, representing 2% of SVs, are more abundant than what have been previously thought, playing an important role in Mendelian diseases [9]. However, due to the challenge in identifying and interpreting such complex SVs, they are typically missed or under-reported during genomic analyses. This familial case study demonstrates the potential of using de novo assembly from short-read WGS data and the use of several structural variant detection tools to identify such rare and complex intrachromosomal rearrangements, which could help with solving the missing heritability in a subset of patients with rare diseases in clinical settings.

Author Contributions

A.A.A.-K. performed literature search, interpretation of results, figures design, and manuscript writing. E.A. conducted and supervised the structural variant analysis pipeline, interpretation of the results and participated in manuscript writing. S.A. performed the analysis and variant validation experiments. W.A. contributed to Whole Genome Sequence data acquisition and analysis. A.A.-S.A., A.A.-M. and H.K. prepared the regulatory requirements and recruited the patient for this study. S.P. played a role in clinical data acquisition and feedback to the physicians. M.A.S. conducted the clinical assessment of the patient and a critical review of the manuscript. K.A.F. designed and planned the study, supervised all experiments, led the interpretation of all results, and performed the final critical review of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded in part by Qatar National Research Fund’s National Priorities Research Program (NPRP11S-0110-180250) and Path to Precision Medicine Program (PPM1-1229-15002), and Sidra Medicine’s Precision Medicine Program Internal Research Fund (IRF 2019: SDR200054 and SDR400034).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Sidra Medicine (IRB 1500816 and date of approval 10 April 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study allowing for the publication of both our research findings as well as the patient’s clinical images.

Data Availability Statement

To respect patients’ privacy and confidentiality, their individual genome data cannot be shared.

Acknowledgments

We thank the patients and family members for their kind participation in this report. We also thank Carl Sulit, medical photographer at Sidra Medicine for the clinical images.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Appendix A.1. Whole-Genome Sequencing

Blood samples were collected from all available family members. Genomic DNA was extracted and WGS data were generated and processed as described previously [20]. Variant identification was based on the following criteria: (1) Being in the coding region including exonic, splice-site region, (2) being rare (<1%) in all mutation databases (i.e., 1000 genomes [21], gnomAD [22], ExAC [23], and ESP6500 [24], and (3) segregating with the phenotype in the family.
For structural variants (SV) analysis, we employed three structural variant callers: Delly version 0.7.8 [PMID: 22962449], Speedseq version 0.1.2 [PMID: 26258291], and Manta version 1.6.0 [PMID: 26647377], and applied the best practices recommended for each tool. Family-level consensus vcf files were generated using SURVIVOR [25]. We retained only SVs reported by at least two tools, with sizes ranging from 50 bp to 10 Mb. The annotation of structural variants was carried out using ANNOTSV version 2.2 [26]. We primarily retained variants predicted to disrupt genes shared by affected individuals, absent in unaffected family members and either novel or very rare in global databases. For the visualization of candidate structural variants, we used SAMPlot version 1.0.7 [PMID: 34034781], and confirmation was performed as described below. For estimation of exact region around breakpoints affected by rearrangement event we debug local assembly and produce the assembly graph at breakpoints of event using SvABA [PMID: 29535149].

Appendix A.2. Primer Design

To confirm the 3 breakpoints identified algorithmically, primers were designed across the breakpoints to differentiate the normal from the rearranged allele. For the reference allele, primer set 1 (P1) was around the 1st breakpoint, primer set 2 (P2) around the 2nd breakpoint, and primer set 3 (P3) around the 3rd breakpoint (Figure A1). Similarly, for the rearranged allele a mixture of the same primer’s sets was used around the breakpoints to confirm the occurrence of a rearrangement event in affected family members (Figure A1). The sequence of the primers used is found in Table A1. Visualization of rearranged allele sequence generated using SvABA de novo assembly(Figure A2).
Figure A1. Primer design. Forwards and reverse primers were designed around the three breakpoints in both the reference and the rearranged alleles.
Figure A1. Primer design. Forwards and reverse primers were designed around the three breakpoints in both the reference and the rearranged alleles.
Genes 14 00849 g0a1
Table A1. Sequence of forward and reverse primers used around the breakpoints.
Table A1. Sequence of forward and reverse primers used around the breakpoints.
Primer SetForward/ReverseSequence 5′ > 3′Product Size
P1ForwardTCCCAGGGAAGCAGCATTTT437
ReverseGAGGTTTGGCAGGAGCAGAT
P2ForwardCAGAGCACAATGTTCCCCCA231
ReverseCAGTGGCCAGGAACCGTATT
P3ForwardAGAAGCAGAAGACCGAGCAA132
ReverseCCCAAAACTGAACCCCTGGA
Figure A2. Visualization of rearranged allele sequence generated using SvABA de novo assembly.
Figure A2. Visualization of rearranged allele sequence generated using SvABA de novo assembly.
Genes 14 00849 g0a2

Appendix A.3. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

A ProFlex PCR System thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) was used. The PCR primer pairs were designed to be specific to the region around the breakpoints in both the reference and rearranged alleles. PCR reactions included a MasterMix (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), forward primer (10 μM), reverse primer (10 μM), and purified DNA. Reaction mix was amplified using 35 cycles as the following: a denaturation phase at 95 °C for 30 s, an annealing phase for 45 sec at a temperature that suites the primers and an extension phase at 72 °C for 1 min. Amplified products (110 bp) were analyzed using ChemiDoc MP Imaging System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) following a 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) containing SYBR Safe (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA).

References

  1. Wilkie, A.O.; Morriss-Kay, G.M. Genetics of craniofacial development and malformation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2021, 2, 458–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Levi, B.; Brugman, S.; Wong, V.W.; Grova, M.; Longaker, M.T.; Wan, D.C. Palatogenesis: Engineering, pathways and pathologies. Organogenesis 2011, 7, 242–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Chandrasekharan, D.; Ramanathan, A. Role of IRF6 Gene in Orofacial Clefting: A Systematic Review. Biomed. Pharmacol. J. 2017, 10, 1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Butali, A.; Mossey, P.A.; Adeyemo, W.L.; Eshete, M.A.; Gaines, L.A.; Even, D.; Braimah, R.O.; Aregbesola, B.S.; Rigdon, J.V.; Emeka, C.I.; et al. Novel IRF6 mutations in families with Van Der Woude syndrome and popliteal pterygium syndrome from sub-Saharan Africa. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 2014, 2, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Leslie, E.J.; Standley, J.; Compton, J.; Bale, S.; Schutte, B.C.; Murray, J.C. Comparative analysis of IRF6 variants in families with Van der Woude syndrome and popliteal pterygium syndrome using public whole-exome databases. Genet. Med. 2013, 15, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Tan, E.C.; Lim, E.C.; Lee, S.T. De Novo 2.3 Mb microdeletion of 1q32. 2 involving the Van der Woude Syndrome locus. Mol. Cytogenet. 2013, 6, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Lees, M.M.; Winter, R.M.; Malcolm, S.; Saal, H.M.; Chitty, L. Popliteal pterygium syndrome: A clinical study of three families and report of linkage to the Van der Woude syndrome locus on 1q32. J. Med. Genet. 1999, 36, 888–892. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tattini, L.; D’Aurizio, R.; Magi, A. Detection of genomic structural variants from next-generation sequencing data. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2015, 3, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Sanchis-Juan, A.; Stephens, J.; French, C.E.; Gleadall, N.; Mégy, K.; Penkett, C.; Shamardina, O.; Stirrups, K.; Delon, I.; Dewhurst, E.; et al. Complex structural variants in Mendelian disorders: Identification and breakpoint resolution using short- and long-read genome sequencing. Genome Med. 2018, 10, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Carvalho, C.; Ramocki, M.B.; Pehlivan, D.; Franco, L.M.; Gonzaga-Jauregui, C.; Fang, P.; McCall, A.; Pivnick, E.K.; Hines-Dowell, S.; Seaver, L.H.; et al. Inverted genomic segments and complex triplication rearrangements are mediated by inverted repeats in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43, 1074–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bergant, G.; Maver, A.; Peterlin, B. Whole-genome sequencing in diagnostics of selected slovenian undiagnosed patients with rare disorders. Life 2021, 11, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chaisson, M.J.; Wilson, R.K.; Eichler, E.E. Genetic variation and the de novo assembly of human genomes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2015, 16, 627–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Boycott, K.M.; Vanstone, M.R.; Bulman, D.E.; MacKenzie, A.E. Rare-disease genetics in the era of next-generation sequencing: Discovery to translation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013, 14, 681–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, Y.; Zheng, H.; Luo, R.; Wu, H.; Zhu, H.; Li, R.; Cao, H.; Wu, B.; Huang, S.; Shao, H.; et al. Structural variation in two human genomes mapped at single-nucleotide resolution by whole genome de novo assembly. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 723–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Fakhro, K.A.; Robay, A.; Rodrigues-Flores, J.L.; Mezey, J.G.; Al-Shakaki, A.A.; Chidiac, O.; Stadler, D.; Malek, J.A.; Imam, A.B.; Sheikh, A.; et al. Point of Care Exome Sequencing Reveals Allelic and Phenotypic Heterogeneity Underlying Mendelian disease in Qatar. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2019, 28, 3970–3981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fakhro, K.A.; Yousri, N.A.; Rodriguez-Flores, J.L.; Robay, A.; Staudt, M.R.; Agosto-Perez, F.; Salit, J.; Malek, J.A.; Suhre, K.; Jayyousi, A.; et al. Copy number variations in the genome of the Qatari population. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Qasim, M.; Shaukat, M. Popliteal pterygium syndrome: A rare entity. APSP J. Case Rep. 2012, 3, 5. [Google Scholar]
  18. Busche, A.; Hehr, U.; Sieg, P.; Gillessen-Kaesbach, G. Van der Woude and Popliteal Pterygium Syndromes: Broad intrafamilial variability in a three-generation family with mutation in IRF6. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 2016, 170, 2404–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Trappe, K.; Emde, A.K.; Ehrlich, H.C.; Reinert, K. Gustaf: Detecting and correctly classifying SVs in the NGS twilight zone. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 3484–3490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Da’as, S.I.; Aamer, W.; Hasan, W.; Al-Maraghi, A.; Al-Kurbi, A.; Kilani, H.; AlRayahi, J.; Zamel, K.; Stotland, M.A.; Fakhro, K.A. PGAP3 Associated with Hyperphosphatasia with Mental Retardation Plays a Novel Role in Brain Morphogenesis and Neuronal Wiring at Early Development. Cells 2020, 9, 1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Consortium, G.P. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 2015, 526, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Karczewski, K.J.; Francioli, L.C.; Tiao, G.; Cummings, B.B.; Alföldi, J.; Wang, Q.; Collins, R.L.; Laricchia, K.M.; Ganna, A.; Birnbaum, D.P.; et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature 2020, 581, 434–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lek, M.; Karczewski, K.J.; Minikel, E.V.; Samocha, K.E.; Banks, E.; Fennell, T.; O’Donnell-Luria, A.; Ware, J.S.; Hill, A.J.; Cummings, B.B.; et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature 2016, 536, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Exome, E.V.S.N.G. Sequencing Project (ESP); Exome Variant Server: Seattle, WA, USA, 2011; Available online: http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/ (accessed on 22 January 2019).
  25. Jeffares, D.C.; Jolly, C.; Hoti, M.; Speed, D.; Shaw, L.; Rallis, C.; Balloux, F.; Dessimoz, C.; Bähler, J.; Sedlazeck, F.J. Transient structural variations have strong effects on quantitative traits and reproductive isolation in fission yeast. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Geoffroy, V.; Guignard, T.; Kress, A.; Gaillard, J.B.; Solli-Nowlan, T.; Schalk, A.; Gatinois, V.; Dollfus, H.; Scheidecker, S.; Muller, J. AnnotSV and knotAnnotSV: A web server for human structural variations annotations, ranking and analysis. Nucl. Acids Res. 2021, 49, W21–W28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Family pedigree and clinical phenotypes in proband and affected family members. (A) Pedigree of family members shows the proband (II-2) with popliteal pterygium syndrome (PPS), father (I-2) and sister (II-1) with van der woude syndrome (VWS); (B) Proband with repaired bilateral cleft lip and lower lip pits and cysts on both sides; (C) Proband with cleft palate; (D) Proband with bilateral complete, simple syndactyly of second and third webspace of the hands; (E) Proband with right popliteal pterygium; (F) Sister with repaired bilateral cleft lip and palate and lower lip pits and cysts on both sides; (G) Father with repaired bilateral cleft lip, unrepaired cleft of the entire secondary palate, and lower lip pits and cysts.
Figure 1. Family pedigree and clinical phenotypes in proband and affected family members. (A) Pedigree of family members shows the proband (II-2) with popliteal pterygium syndrome (PPS), father (I-2) and sister (II-1) with van der woude syndrome (VWS); (B) Proband with repaired bilateral cleft lip and lower lip pits and cysts on both sides; (C) Proband with cleft palate; (D) Proband with bilateral complete, simple syndactyly of second and third webspace of the hands; (E) Proband with right popliteal pterygium; (F) Sister with repaired bilateral cleft lip and palate and lower lip pits and cysts on both sides; (G) Father with repaired bilateral cleft lip, unrepaired cleft of the entire secondary palate, and lower lip pits and cysts.
Genes 14 00849 g001
Figure 2. UpSet plot of variant intersection between the family members. Dotted line showing the shared 136 events in affected family members.
Figure 2. UpSet plot of variant intersection between the family members. Dotted line showing the shared 136 events in affected family members.
Genes 14 00849 g002
Figure 3. Visualization of the rearranged allele appeared as two consecutive deletions encompassed by a bigger duplication at the same region on chromosome 1 segregating in all affected family members.
Figure 3. Visualization of the rearranged allele appeared as two consecutive deletions encompassed by a bigger duplication at the same region on chromosome 1 segregating in all affected family members.
Genes 14 00849 g003
Figure 4. (A) Diagram showing the rearrangement event occurring in affected family members where the red and blue regions are switched disturbing the continuity of IRF6 exon 6; (B) Gel electrophoresis of PCR products (100 bp ladder used) from the reference and rearranged alleles. All family members had the reference allele, while only the affected family members had the rearranged allele. F1/R1, F2/R2, and F3/R3 are the 3 primer sets (Forward and reverse) designed around the breakpoints.
Figure 4. (A) Diagram showing the rearrangement event occurring in affected family members where the red and blue regions are switched disturbing the continuity of IRF6 exon 6; (B) Gel electrophoresis of PCR products (100 bp ladder used) from the reference and rearranged alleles. All family members had the reference allele, while only the affected family members had the rearranged allele. F1/R1, F2/R2, and F3/R3 are the 3 primer sets (Forward and reverse) designed around the breakpoints.
Genes 14 00849 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-Kurbi, A.A.; Aliyev, E.; AlSa’afin, S.; Aamer, W.; Palaniswamy, S.; Al-Maraghi, A.; Kilani, H.; Akil, A.A.-S.; Stotland, M.A.; Fakhro, K.A. A Complex Intrachromosomal Rearrangement Disrupting IRF6 in a Family with Popliteal Pterygium and Van der Woude Syndromes. Genes 2023, 14, 849. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14040849

AMA Style

Al-Kurbi AA, Aliyev E, AlSa’afin S, Aamer W, Palaniswamy S, Al-Maraghi A, Kilani H, Akil AA-S, Stotland MA, Fakhro KA. A Complex Intrachromosomal Rearrangement Disrupting IRF6 in a Family with Popliteal Pterygium and Van der Woude Syndromes. Genes. 2023; 14(4):849. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14040849

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al-Kurbi, Alya A., Elbay Aliyev, Sana AlSa’afin, Waleed Aamer, Sasirekha Palaniswamy, Aljazi Al-Maraghi, Houda Kilani, Ammira Al-Shabeeb Akil, Mitchell A. Stotland, and Khalid A. Fakhro. 2023. "A Complex Intrachromosomal Rearrangement Disrupting IRF6 in a Family with Popliteal Pterygium and Van der Woude Syndromes" Genes 14, no. 4: 849. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14040849

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop