Next Article in Journal
DNA Damage-Induced RNAPII Degradation and Its Consequences in Gene Expression
Previous Article in Journal
Eusocial Transition in Blattodea: Transposable Elements and Shifts of Gene Expression
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 13
Issue 11
10.3390/genes13111950
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genetic Diversity and Population Genetic Structure of Aedes albopictus in the Yangtze River Basin, China

by
Heng-Duan Zhang
†,
Jian Gao
†,
Chun-Xiao Li
,
Zu Ma
,
Yuan Liu
,
Ge Wang
,
Qing Liu
,
Dan Xing
,
Xiao-Xia Guo
,
Teng Zhao
,
Yu-Ting Jiang
,
Yan-De Dong
and
Tong-Yan Zhao
*
State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Beijing 100071, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors have contributed equally to this work.
Genes 2022, 13(11), 1950; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13111950
Submission received: 4 August 2022 / Revised: 6 September 2022 / Accepted: 12 September 2022 / Published: 26 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Population and Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Aedes albopictus is an indigenous primary vector of dengue and Zika viruses in China. Understanding the population spatial genetic structure, migration, and gene flow of vector species is critical to effectively preventing and controlling vector-borne diseases. The genetic variation and population structure of Ae. albopictus populations collected from 22 cities along the Yangtze River Basin were investigated with nine microsatellite loci and the mitochondrial CoxI gene. The polymorphic information content (PIC) values ranged from 0.534 to 0.871. The observed number of alleles (Na) values ranged from 5.455 to 11.455, and the effective number of alleles (Ne) values ranged from 3.106 to 4.041. The Shannon Index (I) ranged from 1.209 to 1.639. The observed heterozygosity (Ho) values ranged from 0.487 to 0.545. The FIS value ranged from 0.047 to 0.212. All Ae. albopictus populations were adequately allocated to three clades with significant genetic differences. Haplotype 2 is the most primitive molecular type and forms 26 other haplotypes after one or more site mutations. The rapid expansion of high-speed rail, aircraft routes and highways along the Yangtze River Basin have accelerated the dispersal and communication of mosquitoes, which appears to have contributed to inhibited population differentiation and promoted genetic diversity among Ae. albopictus populations.

1. Introduction

Ae. albopictus is an important vector of dengue fever, chikungunya fever, and Zika fever globally [1] and is one of 100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species (Global Invasive Species Database (2019). Downloaded from http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/100_worst.php (accessed on 12 December 2000)). Except for Antarctica, the distribution area of Ae. albopictus expands worldwide [2,3,4]. Ae. albopictus is a native mosquito species in Asia, including in most parts of China, where the distribution range of the species includes southern Chaoyang, Liaoning Province, eastern Baoji, Shanxi Province and Tianshui, Gansu Province [5]. Compared with Ae. aegypti, which is found only in several provinces in the southern part of China, Ae. albopictus is the main vector of dengue fever in mainland areas and the main blood-feeding mosquito in urban and rural areas of China [6].
In China, the shipping capacity of the Yangtze River exceeds 71,000 km per year, which is 56% of the total inland river. Meanwhile, its passenger capacity and the volume of freight traffic are 180 million people and 4.714 billon tons, respectively, which is 65% of the total passenger capacity of water passenger volume and 70% of the total water freight traffic volume, respectively. Due to its massive transportation capacity, a comprehensive transportation system of waterway networks, on-land traffic, railways and aviation is well developed alongside the Yangtze River. Mosquitoes can disperse through man-aided transport, especially species of Aedes, involving diapause or desiccative eggs and larvae in container water, and expansion of Ae. aegypti, Ae. albopictus, Ae. japonicus and Ae. koreicus beyond its original distribution to local, regional and intercontinental areas occurs via river boats, sea vessels, automobiles and airplanes [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Research to date has investigated the relationship between transportation and the population genetics of mosquitoes, and population genetic studies in Eastern Argentina indicate that passive dispersal of Ae. aegypti is supported by a low diversity of haplotypes [22]. Population genetic analysis based on the seven microsatellite loci shows that Ae. aegypti is relatively differentiated among 15 seaports in the Philippine Archipelago: low genetic structure and considerable gene flow was found in busy ports, with even distant ports being genetically similar; in small ports, even nearby ports, marine human-mediated long-range dispersal plays a pivotal role in determining the population structure of Ae. aegypti [23]. It has also been suggested that dispersal of Ae. aegypti is more affected by cargo shipments than by passenger ships. This indicates that Ae. aegypti gene flow among sub-populations is greatest between locations with heavy marine traffic [24].
Dispersal patterns and population genetic structure have been analysed to reveal the genetic diversity and gene flow of populations of vector mosquitoes and to supply population genetic information for surveillance as well as for assessing vector competence and integrated management of the species. A series of studies on the population genetics of Ae. albopictus probes showed worldwide dispersal and invasion patterns at regional and country levels based on microsatellites and SNPs in the genome and mitogenome to reveal population diversity [6,25,26,27,28]. The results showed that the low differentiation and high co-ancestry identified among Ae. albopictus populations in the native range, including China, Thailand and Japan, indicates the maintenance of high genetic connectivity of these populations. Using 13 nuclear microsatellite loci and mitochondrial CoxI sequences, it was determined that Ae. albopictus was most likely introduced to New Guinea via mainland Southeast Asia before colonizing the Solomon Islands via either Papua New Guinea or SE Asia, which supports that the recent incursion into northern Australia’s Torres Strait Islands was seeded chiefly from Indonesia. This study was the first to document evidence of a recently colonised population (the Torres Strait Islands) that has undergone rapid temporal changes in its genetic makeup resulting from genetic drift or representing a secondary invasion [29].
Female Ae. albopictus individuals can fly a limited distance of 500 m for blood feeding and oviposition, and long-distance dispersal of Ae. albopictus may occur through the convenient transportation system and the broad international, national and regional trade of tires, lucky bamboo and other items, where larvae and eggs could survive in container water [30]. The present research uses microsatellites and a mitochondrial locus to focus on the population genetic makeup of populations and the genetic diversity of Ae. albopictus in cities and counties along the Yangtze River Basin to reveal its dispersal and population genetic structure under conditions of convenient and heavy transport and to aid in the surveillance and control of the species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Mosquito Sampling

Ae. albopictus individuals were collected between July and September 2018 at 22 cities along the Yangtze River Basin, China (Figure 1, Table 1). Larvae were surveyed using the container method; small, indoor, and outdoor water receptacles were examined for larvae at each sampling site. Larvae were collected in the field with a straw and raised in the laboratory. To avoid inbreeding interference, each pool of larval mosquitoes for a given locality was collected from at least five wild breeding places within 500 m. For each of the samples, the larvae were reared separately and emerged at 25 ± 1 °C at 75 ± 5% relative humidity under 14 h light/10 h dark photoperiod, and then adults were identified as Ae. albopictus after emergence.

2.2. Genotyping of Mosquito Samples

A total of 624 mosquitoes from each of the 22 sample sites were genotyped, and at most 3 to 5 adult mosquitoes were picked out from the same wild breeding place. DNA of individual mosquitoes was extracted following the steps provided with a TAKARA DNA kit and stored at −30 °C until analysis. Individuals were genotyped based on variation at nine microsatellite loci [31]. Approximately 1~2 μL of PCR product was diluted with 10 μL of autoclaved distilled water for DNA. Two microlitres of the diluted PCR product was added to 7.75 μL Hi DiTM formamide and 0.25 Gene Scan-500 LIZTM. The mixture was heated at 94 °C for 5 min and then immediately chilled on ice for 2 min. Genotyping was carried out using a Genetic Analyser3130 ×l (A Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Following Bonacum J. [32], CoxI sequence polymorphisms among the 624 individuals were investigated. Briefly, DNA amplification of a 550-bp fragment of CoxI was performed using a T100 Thermal Cycler with a primer set (5′-GGAGGATTTGGAAATTGATTAGTTC-3′(F-CoxI) and 5′-CCCGGTAAAATT AAAATATAAACTTC-3′ (R-CoxI)) in a 50 µL reaction mixture containing 10 µL PCR buffer, 4 µL dNTPs, 1 µL primers, 0.5 µL Prime STAR HS DNA polymerase, and 34.5 µL ddH20. The PCR amplification program was set as follows: pre-denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 54 °C for 45 s and elongation at 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. All PCR products were separated by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis for detection. The target fragments for CoxI were excised from the gel under UV light and purified with GenElute™ PCR Clean-Up Kit. Each purified PCR product was cloned into the PCR™2.1 vector using TA Cloning™ Kit and selected by bacterial liquid PCR using T7 promoter primers. Finally, at least 20 positive clones for each PCR product were sequenced on both strands using an ABI 3730 × L automatic sequencer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

2.3. Data Analysis

Polymorphic information content (PIC) for each locus was calculated using POPGENE Version 1.3 and PIC-Calc 0.6. Genetic diversity (expected (He), observed (Ho) heterozygosity), the mean number of alleles (Na), and F-statistic parameters (FIS, FST, and FIT) were estimated from allele frequencies with FSTAT 2.9.3.2 [33]. For each locus–population combination for the global data set and population groupings, Fisher’s exact test with Bonferroni correction was employed to test for possible deviations from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) using GENEPOP’007 [34]. Exact p values were calculated using the Markov chain algorithm with 10,000 dememorizations, 500 batches, and 5000 iterations per batch. Arlequin software 3.5.2.2 was used to assess pairwise differences between populations [35] and perform AMOVA [36] based on allelic frequency. In addition, the FST of each population was calculated from the mean value of pairwise differences between populations. An excess of heterozygosity in a significant number of loci (calculated via Bottleneck 1.2.02) is an indicator of a genetic bottleneck, whereas the opposite (i.e., He, Heq) [37] suggests population expansion. NTsys 2.01 software was employed to build the UGPMA tree and the DAPC analysis was performed on the microsatellite data of each population with the R packages “Adegenet 2.1.3”. IBD analysis was also calculated via the R packages “Adegenet 2.1.3” with the comparation between genetic distance and geographic distance of all populations. The haplotypes of all populations were screened with DnaSP version 6.0 [38], and genetic relationships among all haplotypes were displayed as a TCS network constructed by Network 10.0.0.0 [39,40]. Moreover, Tajima’s D test was tested via Arlequin 3.5.2.2 to determine the population diffusion of each population, while dispersal routes among 7 locations were calculated via the R packages “divMigrate” with the number of bootstrap replicates set to 3, the α value set to 0.05, the Nm method chosen for the migration statistic and the filter threshold value set to 0.15.

3. Results

3.1. Genetic Diversity and Variation

In the present study, 22 Ae. albopictus populations were collected along the Yangtze River Basin (Table 1 and Figure 1). Nine pairs of microsatellite markers were found to be highly polymorphic and were therefore chosen for microsatellite genotyping analysis (Table S1). The PIC values of each locus range from 0.534 to 0.871. According to the definition of PIC values provided by Allah et al. [41], all of the selected markers are highly informative (PIC value > 0.5) (Table S1). As shown in Table 2, the observed number of alleles (Na) and the effective number of alleles (Ne) of each population range from 5.455~11.455 and from 3.106~4.041, respectively. The mean Na value of the midstream and downstream Yangtze River Basin populations (10.955) was calculated to be higher than that of the upstream Yangtze River Basin populations (8.364), except for Shanghai (5.455). Similarly, except for Shanghai (3.106), the mean Ne of the midstream and downstream populations (4.082) is higher than that of the upstream populations (3.780). The Shannon index (I) of each population ranges from 1.209 to 1.639. The mean I value of the midstream and downstream Yangtze River Basin populations (1.588) is higher than that of the upstream Yangtze River Basin populations (1.538); the I in Hubei is highest (1.639) and that in Shanghai lowest (1.209). The observed heterozygosity (Ho) values of all areas range from 0.487 to 0.545, which are lower than the expected heterozygosity (He) values (ranging from 0.617 to 0.709). Except for Shanghai, the FIS value of each population ranges from 0.047 to 0.212, and each Ae. albopictus population exhibited significant departure from HWE.

3.2. Population Structure and Differentiation Based on Microsatellite Analysis

In population structure analysis, all Ae. albopictus populations were adequately allocated to three groups with k-means calculation function of Adegenet 2.1.3 and the geographical distribution of samples (Figure 2a). Group I includes Shanghai, which was completely separate from the other six regions; Group II includes Hubei, Chongqing and Sichuan; and Group III includes Anhui, Jiangsu and Jiangxi. DAPC analysis showed the same grouping results (Figure 2b). AMOVA results are presented in Supplemental Table S1. From the total genetic variation partitioned, 2.03% could be attributed to differences among individuals within populations and 97.97% to differences within individuals (FST = 0.0203, FIS = 0.17846, FIT = 0.19514, and all p < 0.00001). In addition, pairwise FST values between populations range from 0.002 (Anhui and Jiangsu) to 0.108 (Shanghai and Chongqing). Overall, genetic differentiation between Ae. albopictus populations in Shanghai and the other six regions was found to be moderate, whereas the genetic differentiation levels among the other six regions is negligible (Table 3). We detected frequent communication among Ae. albopictus populations in the Yangtze River Basin, with the population diffusion path mainly spreading from Chongqing (CQ), Shanghai (SH), Jiangsu (JS), Jiangxi (JX) and Anhui (AH) to Hubei (HB), where gene flow (Nm) among populations was observed to be greater than 0.70, except in Shanghai (Figure 3). Meanwhile, a significant bottleneck effect was also detected among Ae. albopictus populations from all seven locations (Table 4). In contrast to the high individual variation observed, no significant positive correlation among all individuals was detected by isolation by distance (IBD) analysis (p = 0.147); While significant positive correlation (p = 0.009) between the genetic distance and the geographical distance of all individuals, when the Shanghai population was eliminated (Supplemental Figure S1).

3.3. Haplotype Diversity and Network Analysis Based on CoxI Sequences

A total of 27 CoxI haplotypes were found among 624 Ae. albopictus individuals based on analysis of CoxI sequences, and the haplotype indices changed dramatically across Ae. albopictus populations from different areas (Table 5). Across all populations, the number of polymorphic sites ranges from 1 (Shanghai) to 13 (Hubei). Except for Shanghai (Hd = 0.000; π = 0.000), the haplotype diversity (Hd) ranges from 0.074 (Chongqing) to 0.393 (Hubei), with nucleotide diversity (π) ranging from 0.0002 (Chongqing) to 0.001 (Anhui and Hubei). As illustrated in Supplemental Figure S2, a TCS network was reconstructed with all 624 CoxI sequences, and the results showed haplotype 2 (H2) to be the most common molecular type and the most frequent haplotype in Ae. albopictus populations in different regions of the Yangtze River Basin. Additionally, H2 forms 26 other haplotypes after one or more site mutations.

4. Discussion

The number of alleles, heterozygosity, and polymorphism information content (PIC) are common indices to evaluate the genetic diversity of populations [42,43,44], and PIC is a relatively good index of gene fragment polymorphism: the higher the population heterozygosity, the greater the genetic diversity and levels of polymorphism and the greater the potential variation for natural selection to act on. A He value between 0.5 and 0.8 reveals high genetic polymorphism in a population [45]. The average expected heterozygosity in this study was found to be 0.677, indicating high polymorphism. The average PIC of 0.706 suggests highly polymorphic loci [6,46,47]. Such variation in the nine microsatellites shows that the 22 Ae. albopictus populations are relatively rich in terms of PIC and have relatively even gene frequency distributions in the Yangtze River Basin. This approach is a highly effective and reliable way of assessing genetic diversity, and the results also show that the sample size was more than adequate. Analysis of CoxI polymorphism data for Ae. albopictus revealed different haplotypes in each population; 27 haplotypes were found in 624 samples, which suggests high genetic diversity.
According to the results of population differentiation analysis, all Ae. albopictus populations were adequately allocated to three clades with significant genetic differences. Shanghai was completely separated from the other six regions, and the Fst values > 0.05 in the population of Shanghai and the other six regions indicated a moderate level [43]. Previous studies have shown that the spread of mosquitoes is closely related to human activities [48]. Genome-wide SNPs have been used to reveal drivers of gene flow in Guangzhou, and the results showed that human transportation networks, particularly shipping terminals, influence the genetic structure of Ae. albopictus populations [49]. Landscape genetics and information-theoretic model selection have also been used to evaluate the relative roles of human aid and natural movement. In general, highways and water way availability are important and facilitate dispersal at a broad spatial scale [50]. With the rapid development of China, a comprehensive transportation system has formed alongside the Yangtze River Basin, including water transport, railways, highways, and aviation. Based on the result of diffusion analysis that frequent communication was detected among Ae. albopictus populations in the Yangtze River Basin and the significant bottleneck effect of each Ae. albopictus population, we hypothesised that the rapid expansion of high-speed rail, aircraft routes, and highways along the Yangtze River Basin has not only facilitated trade among different cities but has also accelerated the spread of mosquitoes. Meanwhile, compared with other cities, Shanghai’s disinfection work may be more thorough, resulting in a single diversity of mosquitoes.
As a transportation hub, Hubei Province connects the upper and lower Yangtze River. According to the results of haplotype diversity, Hubei Ae. albopictus populations contain 13 polymorphic sites, which is much higher than in other areas. The Shannon index was also richest in Hubei due to the high gene flow (Nm > 0.70) between Hubei and the other collection sites, except Shanghai (Nm = 0.17). This may be due to natural and geographical factors in Hubei, which is known as the “province of thousands of lakes”. Hubei has a rich ecosystem and various geomorphological types, including mountains, hills, and plains. Hubei has a strong high-speed rail hub network, air transport network, highway network and water transport system, directly connecting it with 10 other provinces and cities in China. Ae. albopictus populations can disperse and communicate via convenient transportation [51], which is the main reason for the greater number of haplotypes and richer haplotype diversity in Hubei.
In general, the genetic distance of populations and geographic separation are positively correlated; however, no significant correlation between these two variables was observed among all populations in the present study. Moreover, the genetic distance of Ae. albopictus displays no relationship with geographic distance in a study in which the mosquitos were sampled from 19 sites across 2512 km2 of volcanic Réunion Island [52], with different results in the Indo-Pacific, where the sample sites included Australasia, SE Asia, the Indian Ocean, Pacific Ocean islands and the United States [30]. This model assumes that populations that are closer to the original population should genetically be much more similar than those that are distant from the original population. At the same time, this satisfies the model’s prerequisite of obvious genetic and geographic distance between populations. Based on AMOVA, the most genetic variation in Ae. albopictus was detected within individuals, at 97.97%. Long-distance dispersal of mosquitoes including Ae. albopictus and Ae. aegypti is driven by human activity, with particular emphasis on human trafficking [14,16,17,18,21,22,23,24,29,48,50,53,54], resulting in high gene flow and low genetic distance along the Yangtze River Basin.
FIS is an index of inbreeding within populations. In present study, all FIS values tested are positive, which means different degrees of inbreeding exist in the populations. Meanwhile, Ho values were lower than He values, which also indicated high gene consistency for the Ae. albopictus populations and that the population might be inbreeding. A combination of anthropogenic and natural factors, such as eradication of breeding habitat, high temperature and decreased rainfall, may lead to breeding habitat fragmentation and reduced population size and therefore increase the likelihood of inbreeding, leading to a heterozygosity deficit [55,56]. Nevertheless, the neutral Tajima’s D test results showed that all populations were negative, suggesting that Ae. albopictus populations in the Yangtze River Basin are expanding. This may be due to the influence of hosts and various vehicles in the area.

5. Conclusions

The present study systematically evaluated the genetic variation, population structure and haplotype-based phylogenetic relationships of Ae. albopictus populations in the Yangtze River Basin. All Ae. albopictus populations were adequately allocated to three clades with significant genetic differences. Continuous dispersal and communication, as aided by human activities and transportation, appears to contribute to inhibited population differentiation and to promote genetic diversity among Ae. albopictus populations in the Yangtze River Basin.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes13111950/s1, Figure S1: IBD analysis of Ae. albopictus population in the Yangtze River Basin, Figure S2: Hap-lotype network analysis of 22 Ae. albopictus populations in the Yangtze River Basin based on CoxI gene, Table S1: Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) test of 22 Ae. albopictus populations sampled from 7 locations of the Yangtze River Basin.

Author Contributions

H.-D.Z., J.G., C.-X.L. and T.-Y.Z. jointly designed and coordinated the study, with contributions from Z.M., X.-X.G., D.X. and Y.-D.D.; H.-D.Z. drafted the article with contributions from J.G. and C.-X.L.; H.-D.Z., J.G., Z.M., Y.L., G.W., Q.L., T.Z. and Y.-T.J. collected samples from the Yangtze River Basin of China; H.-D.Z., J.G., C.-X.L. and Z.M. carried out the laboratory work and performed the statistical analysis; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by grants from the Infective Diseases Prevention and Cure Project of China (No.2017ZX10303404).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gratz, N.G. Critical review of the vector status of Aedes albopictus. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2004, 18, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bonizzoni, M.; Gasperi, G.; Chen, X.; James, A.A. The invasive mosquito species Aedes albopictus: Current knowledge and future perspectives. Trends Parasitol. 2013, 29, 460–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Tatem, A.J.; Hay, S.I.; Rogers, D.J. Global traffic and disease vector dispersal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 6242–6247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Tatem, A.J.; Rogers, D.J.; Hay, S.I. Global transport networks and infectious disease spread. Adv. Parasitol. 2006, 62, 293–343. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wu, F.; Liu, Q.; Lu, L.; Wang, J.; Song, X.; Ren, D. Distribution of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in northwestern China. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011, 11, 1181–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Liu, K.; Hou, X.; Wang, Y.; Sun, J.; Xiao, J.; Li, R.; Lu, L.; Xu, L.; Sang, S.; Hu, J.; et al. The driver of dengue fever incidence in two high-risk areas of China: A comparative study. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Reiter, P. Aedes albopictus and the world trade in used tires, 1988–1995: The shape of things to come? J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 1998, 14, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Laird, M.; Calder, L.; Thornton, R.C.; Syme, R.; Holder, P.; Mogi, M. Japanese Aedes albopictus among four mosquito species reaching New Zealand in used tires. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 1994, 10, 14–23. [Google Scholar]
  9. Craven, R.B.; Eliason, D.A.; Francy, D.B.; Reiter, P.; Campos, E.G.; Jakob, W.L.; Smith, G.C.; Bozzi, C.J.; Moore, C.G.; Maupin, G.O. Importation of Aedes albopictus and other exotic mosquito species into the United States in used tires from Asia. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 1988, 4, 138–142. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Moore, C.G.; Mitchell, C.J. Aedes albopictus in the United States: Ten-year presence and public health implications. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 1997, 3, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Reiter, P.; Sprenger, D. The used tire trade: A mechanism for the worldwide dispersal of container breeding mosquitoes. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 1987, 3, 494–501. [Google Scholar]
  12. Benedict, M.Q.; Levine, R.S.; Hawley, W.A.; Lounibos, L.P. Spread of the tiger: Global risk of invasion by the mosquito Aedes albopictus. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2007, 7, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Scholte, E.J.; Dijkstra, E.; Blok, H.; De Vries, A.; Takken, W.; Hofhuis, A.; Koopmans, M.; De Boer, A.; Reusken, C.B.E.M. Accidental importation of the mosquito Aedes albopictus into the Netherlands: A survey of mosquito distribution and the presence of dengue virus. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2008, 22, 352–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bennett, K.; Martínez, C.G.; Almanza, A.; Rovira, J.R.; McMillan, W.O.; Enriquez, V.; Barraza, E.; Diaz, M.; Sanchez-Galan, J.; Whiteman, A.; et al. High infestation of invasive Aedes mosquitoes in used tires along the local transport network of Panama. Parasit. Vectors 2019, 12, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Lwande, O.W.; Obanda, V.; Lindström, A.; Ahlm, C.; Evander, M.; Näslund, J.; Bucht, G. Globe-Trotting Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus: Risk Factors for Arbovirus Pandemics. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2020, 20, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Sherpa, S.; Blum, M.G.B.; Capblancq, T.; Cumer, T.; Rioux, D.; Després, L. Unravelling the invasion history of the Asian tiger mosquito in Europe. Mol. Ecol. 2019, 28, 2360–2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Egizi, A.; Kiser, J.; Abadam, C.; Fonseca, D.M. The hitchhiker’s guide to becoming invasive: Exotic mosquitoes spread across a US state by human transport not autonomous flight. Mol. Ecol. 2016, 25, 3033–3047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ibáñez-Justicia, A.; Koenraadt, C.J.M.; Stroo, A.; van Lammeren, R.; Takken, W. Risk-Based and Adaptive Invasive Mosquito Surveillance at Lucky Bamboo and Used Tire Importers in the Netherlands. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 2020, 36, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Guagliardo, S.A.; Morrison, A.C.; Barboza, J.L.; Requena, E.; Astete, H.; Vazquez-Prokopec, G.; Kitron, U. River boats contribute to the regional spread of the dengue vector Aedes aegypti in the Peruvian Amazon. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0003648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Miller, M.J.; Loaiza, J.R. Geographic expansion of the invasive mosquito Aedes albopictus across Panama—Implications for control of dengue and Chikungunya viruses. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0003383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Hofhuis, A.; Reimerink, J.; Reusken, C.B.E.M.; Scholte, E.J.; De Boer, A.; Takken, W.; Koopmans, M. The hidden passenger of lucky bamboo: Do imported Aedes albopictus mosquitoes cause dengue virus transmission in the Netherlands? Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2009, 9, 217–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Díaz-Nieto, L.M.; Chiappero, M.B.; de Astarloa, C.D.; Maciá, A.; Gardenal, C.N.; Berón, C.M. Genetic Evidence of Expansion by Passive Transport of Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti in Eastern Argentina. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, e0004839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Fonzi, E.; Higa, Y.; Bertuso, A.G.; Futami, K.; Minakawa, N. Human-Mediated Marine Dispersal Influences the Population Structure of Aedes aegypti in the Philippine Archipelago. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0003829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Guagliardo, S.A.J.; Lee, Y.; Pierce, A.A.; Wong, J.; Chu, Y.Y.; Morrison, A.C.; Astete, H.; Brosi, B.; Vazquez-Prokopec, G.; Scott, T.W.; et al. The genetic structure of Aedes aegypti populations is driven by boat traffic in the Peruvian Amazon. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Battaglia, V.; Gabrieli, P.; Brandini, S.; Capodiferro, M.R.; Javier, P.A.; Chen, X.-G.; Achilli, A.; Semino, O.; Gomulski, L.M.; Malacrida, A.R.; et al. The Worldwide Spread of the Tiger Mosquito as Revealed by Mitogenome Haplogroup Diversity. Front. Genet. 2016, 7, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Goubert, C.; Minard, G.; Vieira, C.; Boulesteix, M. Population genetics of the Asian tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus, an invasive vector of human diseases. Heredity 2016, 117, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wei, Y.; Wang, J.; Song, Z.; He, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Fan, P.; Yang, D.; Zhou, G.; Zhong, D.; Zheng, X. Patterns of spatial genetic structures in Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) populations in China. Parasit. Vectors 2019, 12, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Schmidt, T.L.; Swan, T.; Chung, J.; Karl, S.; Demok, S.; Yang, Q.; Field, M.A.; Muzari, M.O.; Ehlers, G.; Brugh, M.; et al. Spatial population genomics of a recent mosquito invasion. Mol. Ecol. 2021, 30, 1174–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Maynard, A.J.; Ambrose, L.; Cooper, R.D.; Chow, W.K.; Davis, J.B.; Muzari, M.O.; van den Hurk, A.F.; Hall-Mendelin, S.; Hasty, J.M.; Burkot, T.R.; et al. Tiger on the prowl: Invasion history and spatio-temporal genetic structure of the Asian tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus (Skuse 1894) in the Indo-Pacific. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0005546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Zhang, H.-D.; Gao, J.; Xing, D.; Guo, X.-X.; Dong, Y.-D.; Li, C.-X.; Zheng, Z.; Ma, Z.; Wu, Z.-M.; Zhu, X.-J.; et al. Fine-scale genetic structure and wolbachia infection of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Nanjing city, China. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 827655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gao, J.; Zhang, H.-D.; Guo, X.-X.; Xing, D.; Dong, Y.-D.; Lan, C.-J.; Wang, G.; Li, C.-J.; Li, C.-X.; Zhao, T.-Y. Dispersal patterns and population genetic structure of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in three different climatic regions of China. Parasit. Vectors 2021, 14, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bonacum, J.; DeSalle, R.; O’Grady, P.; Olivera DS, C.G.; Wintermute, J.; Zilversmit, M. New nuclear and mitochondrial primers for systematics and comparative genomics in Drosophilidae. Drosoph. Inf. Serv. 2001, 84, 201–204. [Google Scholar]
  33. Goudet, J. FSTAT, a Program to Estimate and Test Gene Diversities and Fixation Indices (Version 2.9.3). Updated from Goudet (1995). 2001. Available online: http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html (accessed on 5 July 2021).
  34. Rousset, F. genepop’007: A complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2008, 8, 103–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Slatkin, M. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 1995, 139, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Excoffier, L.; Lischer, H.E. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2010, 10, 564–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Piry, S.; Luikart, G.; Cornuet, J.-M. Bottleneck: A Computer Program for Detecting Recent Reductions in the Effective Population Size Using Allele Frequency Data. 2017. Available online: http://www.ensam.inra.fr/URLB (accessed on 5 July 2021).
  38. Rozas, J.; Sánchez-DelBarrio, J.C.; Messeguer, X.; Rozas, R. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 2496–2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Fröhlich, F.; Schmidt, S.L. Rational design of transcranial current stimulation (TCS) through mechanistic insights into cortical network dynamics. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013, 7, 804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Múrias dos Santos, A.; Cabezas, M.P.; Tavares, A.I.; Xavier, R.; Branco, M. tcsBU: A tool to extend TCS network layout and visualization. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 627–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Ditta, A.; Zhou, Z.; Cai, X.; Shehzad, M.; Wang, X.; Okubazghi, K.W.; Xu, Y.; Hou, Y.; Iqbal, M.S.; Khan, M.K.R.; et al. Genome-Wide Mining and Characterization of SSR Markers for Gene Mapping and Gene Diversity in Gossypium barbadense L. and Gossypium darwinii G. Watt Accessions. Agronomy 2018, 8, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Nei, M.; Maruyama, T.; Chakraborty, R. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 1975, 29, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Maudet, C.; Miller, C.; Bassano, B.; Breitenmoser-Würsten, C.; Gauthier, D.; Obexer-Ruff, G.; Michallet, J.; Taberlet, P.; Luikart, G. Microsatellite DNA and recent statistical methods in wildlife conservation management: Applications in Alpine ibex [Capra ibex (ibex)]. Mol. Ecol. 2002, 11, 421–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Botstein, D.; White, R.L.; Skolnick, M.; Davis, R.W. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1980, 32, 314–331. [Google Scholar]
  45. Takezaki, N.; Nei, M. Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genetics 1996, 144, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Multini, L.C.; de Souza, A.L.D.S.; Marrelli, M.T.; Wilke, A.B.B. Population structuring of the invasive mosquito Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) on a microgeographic scale. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0220773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Sherpa, S.; Rioux, D.; Pougnet-Lagarde, C.; Després, L. Genetic diversity and distribution differ between long-established and recently introduced populations in the invasive mosquito Aedes albopictus. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2018, 58, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gippet, J.M.; Liebhold, A.M.; Fenn-Moltu, G.; Bertelsmeier, C. Human-mediated dispersal in insects. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2019, 35, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Schmidt, T.L.; Rašić, G.; Zhang, D.; Zheng, X.; Xi, Z.; Hoffmann, A.A. Genome-wide SNPs reveal the drivers of gene flow in an urban population of the Asian Tiger Mosquito, Aedes albopictus. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0006009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Medley, K.A.; Jenkins, D.G.; Hoffman, E.A. Human-aided and natural dispersal drive gene flow across the range of an invasive mosquito. Mol. Ecol. 2014, 24, 284–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zé-Zé, L.; Borges, V.; Osório, H.C.; Machado, J.; Gomes, J.P.; Alves, M.J. Mitogenome diversity of Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus: Detection of multiple introduction events in Portugal. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020, 14, e0008657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Latreille, A.C.; Milesi, P.; Magalon, H.; Mavingui, P.; Atyame, C.M. High genetic diversity but no geographical structure of Aedes albopictus populations in Reunion Island. Parasit. Vectors 2019, 12, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Eritja, R.; Palmer, J.R.B.; Roiz, D.; Sanpera-Calbet, I.; Bartumeus, F. Direct Evidence of Adult Aedes albopictus Dispersal by Car. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 14399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Villena, O.C.; Terry, I.; Iwata, K.; Landa, E.R.; LaDeau, S.L.; Leisnham, P.T. Effects of tire leachate on the invasive mosquito Aedes albopictus and the native congener Aedes triseriatus. PeerJ 2017, 5, e3756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Powell, J.R. Genetic Variation in Insect Vectors: Death of Typology? Insects 2018, 9, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Powell, J.R.; Evans, B.R. How Much Does Inbreeding Reduce Heterozygosity? Empirical Results from Aedes aegypti. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2017, 96, 157–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genes 13 01950 g001 550
Figure 1. Ae. albopictus individuals were collected between July and September 2018 at 22 cities along the Yangtze River Basin.
Figure 1. Ae. albopictus individuals were collected between July and September 2018 at 22 cities along the Yangtze River Basin.
Genes 13 01950 g001
Genes 13 01950 g002 550
Figure 2. UGPMA (a) and DAPC (b) analysis of Ae. albopictus population structure based on microsatellite loci in the Yangtze River Basin. The x-axis for Figure 2a stands for the Dice Coefficient of Similarity. For Figure 2b, eighty first principal components (PCs) and six discriminant eigenvalues were retained during the analyses to describe the relationship between the clusters. The axes represent the first two linear discriminants (LD). Each circle represents a cluster and each colour represents the different subpopulations identified by the DAPC.
Figure 2. UGPMA (a) and DAPC (b) analysis of Ae. albopictus population structure based on microsatellite loci in the Yangtze River Basin. The x-axis for Figure 2a stands for the Dice Coefficient of Similarity. For Figure 2b, eighty first principal components (PCs) and six discriminant eigenvalues were retained during the analyses to describe the relationship between the clusters. The axes represent the first two linear discriminants (LD). Each circle represents a cluster and each colour represents the different subpopulations identified by the DAPC.
Genes 13 01950 g002
Genes 13 01950 g003 550
Figure 3. Diffusion analysis of Ae. albopictus population in the Yangtze River Basin based on microsatellite loci. Each circle stands for the Ae. albopictus population, the values (Nm) stand for the gene flow between two populations and the arrows stand for the direction of the gene flow, which varies with the gene flow value; the diffusion routines with Nm value greater than 0.2 are displayed.
Figure 3. Diffusion analysis of Ae. albopictus population in the Yangtze River Basin based on microsatellite loci. Each circle stands for the Ae. albopictus population, the values (Nm) stand for the gene flow between two populations and the arrows stand for the direction of the gene flow, which varies with the gene flow value; the diffusion routines with Nm value greater than 0.2 are displayed.
Genes 13 01950 g003
Table
Table 1. Sampling information of all 22 Ae. albopictus populations distributed in various regions of the Yangtze River.
Table 1. Sampling information of all 22 Ae. albopictus populations distributed in various regions of the Yangtze River.
No.LocationPopulation CodeGeographic CoordinateSample Size
1Anhui
(downstream)		AHBHN30°53′10.41″ E117°46′18.71″25
2AHYAN30°57′31.85″ E117°47′14.68″30
3AHTLN30°56′12.57″ E117°49′16.35″30
4Jiangsu
(downstream)		NJDXN32°03′25.02″ E118°46′27.42″26
5JSJYN31°54′05.29″ E120°16′20.34″28
6JYCSN31°55′31.69″ E120°15′19.61″30
7NJZSN32°05′19.69″ E118°43′54.56″30
8NJTHN32°04′14.44″ E118°45′54.30″30
9Jiangxi
(downstream)		JJLSN29°40′07.78″ E115°56′54.98″28
10JJXYN29°40′45.15″ E116°00′17.82″30
11JJWFN29°43′54.65″ E115°59′44.95″30
12Shanghai (downstream)
(downstream)		SHJDN31°12′03.49″ E121°25′41.03″25
13Hubei
(midstream)		WHWCN30°33′18.14″ E114°17′35.34″30
14WHDXN30°31′52.51″ E114°21′12.32″30
15HBSXN30°43′50.35″ E111°18′24.41″26
16HBQNN30°43′13.14″ E111°16′16.61″27
17HBYCN30°40′06.23″ E111°16′01.27″30
18HBBDN30°19′33.84″ E112°14′28.09″30
19Chongqing (upstream)CQDXN29°34′01.11″ E106°27′51.77″27
20CQWZN30°49′17.86″ E108°22′40.18″30
21Sichuan (upstream)KZXZN30°39′57.73″ E104°03′00.46″22
22SCDXN30°37′57.88″ E104°04′52.49″30
AHBH: AnHuiBaiHe; AHYA: AnHuiYiAn; AHTL: AnHuiTongLin; NJDX:NanJingDaXue; JSJY: JiangSuJiangYin; JYCS: JiangYinChunShen; NJZS: NanJingZhongShan; NJTH: NanJingTianHe; JJLS: JiuJiangLuShan; JJXY: JiuJiangXueYuan; JJWF: JiuJiangWanFu; SHJD: ShangHaiJiaoDa; WHWC: WuHanWuChang; WHDX: WuHanDaXue; HBSX: HuBeiShanXia; HBQN: HuBeiQiaoNan; HBYC: HuBeiYichang; HBBD: HuBeiBiDian; CQDX: ChongQingDaXue; CQWZ: ChongQingWanZhou; KZXZ: KuanZhaiXiangZi; SCDX: SiChuanDaXue.
Table
Table 2. Genetic diversity indices of 22 Ae. albopictus populations sampled from seven locations of the Yangtze River Basin based on nine microsatellite loci.
Table 2. Genetic diversity indices of 22 Ae. albopictus populations sampled from seven locations of the Yangtze River Basin based on nine microsatellite loci.
LocationnaneIHoHeWHDFIS
Anhui11.455 ± 2.7704.041 ± 2.2081.610 ± 0.4860.532 ± 0.2280.688 ± 0.1770.252 ***0.143 ***
Jiangsu11.273 ± 3.3493.896 ± 1.8411.578 ± 0.4780.487 ± 0.2290.678 ± 0.1870.288 ***0.210 ***
Jiangxi9.818 ± 3.0934.166 ± 2.2271.576 ± 0.4980.532 ± 0.2290.692 ± 0.1660.272 ***0.150 ***
Shanghai5.455 ± 2.1153.106 ± 1.4361.209 ± 0.4690.545 ± 0.2120.617 ± 0.1870.123 0.047
Hubei11.273 ± 3.3194.223 ± 1.8311.639 ± 0.4560.513 ± 0.2160.709 ± 0.1610.329 ***0.212 ***
Chongqing8.455 ± 2.4233.649 ± 1.6341.460 ± 0.4660.495 ± 0.2440.659 ± 0.1960.313 ***0.171 ***
Sichuan8.273 ± 1.8493.910 ± 1.6281.514 ± 0.4300.522 ± 0.2180.693 ± 0.1760.342 **0.168 ***
“± values” are standard deviations. na means numbers of alleles; ne means numbers of effective alleles; I means Shannon index; Ho means observed heterozygosity; He means expected heterozygosity; WHD means Hardy–Weinberg disequilibrium; FIS means inbreeding coefficient. ** means p-value < 0.01, *** means p-value < 0.001.
Table
Table 3. Genetic difference (FST) among 22 Ae. albopictus populations sampled from seven locations of the Yangtze River Basin.
Table 3. Genetic difference (FST) among 22 Ae. albopictus populations sampled from seven locations of the Yangtze River Basin.
AnhuiJiangsuJiangxiHubeiChongqingSichuanShanghai
Anhui 0.155 ± 0.0040.004 ± 0.0010.000 ± 0.0000.000 ± 0.0000.000 ± 0.0000.000 ± 0.000
Jiangsu0.002 0.000 ± 0.0000.000 ± 0.0000.000 ± 0.0000.000 ± 0.0000.000 ± 0.000
Jiangxi0.0080.013 0.000 ± 0.0000.000 ± 0.0000.000 ± 0.0000.000 ± 0.000
Hubei0.0110.0110.015 0.000 ± 0.0000.002 ± 0.0000.000 ± 0.000
Chongqing0.0220.0270.0240.015 0.000 ± 0.0000.000 ± 0.000
Sichuan0.0180.0210.0190.0090.015 0.000 ± 0.000
Shanghai0.0730.0750.0670.0670.1080.082
The numbers below the diagonal are FST values among each Ae. albopictus population, while numbers above the diagonal are p values for each FST value. The ± values are standard deviation.
Table
Table 4. Heterozygosity tests of 22 Ae. albopictus populations among seven locations based on the stepwise mutation model (S.M.M.) and two-phase model (T.P.M.).
Table 4. Heterozygosity tests of 22 Ae. albopictus populations among seven locations based on the stepwise mutation model (S.M.M.) and two-phase model (T.P.M.).
Yangtze River BasinAnhuiJiangsuJiangxiHubeiChongqingSichuanShanghai
S.M.M.He < Heq *1111101110108
He > Heq *0010113
p (He < Heq)0.0000.0000.0010.0000.0010.0010.032
T.P.M.He < Heq9968764
He > Heq2253457
p (He < Heq)0.0070.0070.2650.0310.1110.2650.514
*: He < Heq shows the numbers of loci showing a heterozygote deficient, while He > Heq shows the number of loci showing a heterozygote excess; p (He < Heq): p-value of Wilcoxon tests to determine the significance of the number of loci in which He < Heq.
Table
Table 5. The genetic diversity indices of all 22 Ae. albopictus populations sampled from seven locations of the Yangtze River Basin via CoxI analysis.
Table 5. The genetic diversity indices of all 22 Ae. albopictus populations sampled from seven locations of the Yangtze River Basin via CoxI analysis.
NO.LocationRegionHHdπkTajima’s DFu’s FsHaplotypes
1downstreamAnhui90.3150.0010.341−1.976 *−1.624H1(3),H2(67),H3(2),H4(2),H5(1),H6(1),H7(2),H8(2),H9(1)
2downstreamJiangsu60.1790.00040.185−1.669−2.407 *H2(105),H3(1),H15(1),H16(6),H23(2),H24(1)
3downstreamJiangxi70.3690.00080.403−1.603−1.154H2(57),H9(4),H10(1),H15(2),H17(5),H20(2),H21(1),
4downstreamShanghai10.0000.0000.0000.0000.000H2(25)
5midstreamHubei130.3930.0010.436−1.958 *−2.362 *H2(135),H4(2),H9(2),H10(4),H11(3),H12(1),H15(9),H16(1),H17(9),H18(5),H19(1),H21(1)
6upstreamChongqing40.0740.00020.075−1.639−3.251 **H2(77),H12(1),H13(1),H14(1)
7upstreamSichuan70.3150.00070.337−1.885 *−3.229 *H2(43),H3(1),H9(1),H15(1),H22(1),H25(4),H26(1)
H means the types of haplotypes; Hd means haplotype diversity; π means nucleotide diversity; k means the average number of nucleotide differences. * means p-value < 0.05; ** means p-value < 0.01.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, H.-D.; Gao, J.; Li, C.-X.; Ma, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, G.; Liu, Q.; Xing, D.; Guo, X.-X.; Zhao, T.; et al. Genetic Diversity and Population Genetic Structure of Aedes albopictus in the Yangtze River Basin, China. Genes 2022, 13, 1950. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13111950

AMA Style

Zhang H-D, Gao J, Li C-X, Ma Z, Liu Y, Wang G, Liu Q, Xing D, Guo X-X, Zhao T, et al. Genetic Diversity and Population Genetic Structure of Aedes albopictus in the Yangtze River Basin, China. Genes. 2022; 13(11):1950. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13111950

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Heng-Duan, Jian Gao, Chun-Xiao Li, Zu Ma, Yuan Liu, Ge Wang, Qing Liu, Dan Xing, Xiao-Xia Guo, Teng Zhao, and et al. 2022. "Genetic Diversity and Population Genetic Structure of Aedes albopictus in the Yangtze River Basin, China" Genes 13, no. 11: 1950. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13111950

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop