Next Article in Journal
Effects of Aspen and Spruce Density on Size and Number of Lower Branches 20 Years after Thinning of Two Boreal Mixedwood Stands
Next Article in Special Issue
Nitrogen Fertilization Increases Windstorm Damage in an Aggrading Forest
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental Drivers and Age Trends in Site Productivity for Oak in Southern Poland
Previous Article in Special Issue
Long- and Short-Term Inorganic Nitrogen Runoff from a Karst Catchment in Austria
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Large-Scale Nitrogen Fertilization on Insect–Plant Interactions in the Canopy of Tall Alder Trees with N2-Fixing Traits in a Cool Temperate Forest

1
Division of Restoration Research, Research Center for Endangered Species, National Institute of Ecology, Yeongyang 36531, Korea
2
Wakayama Experimental Forest, Field Science Center for Northern Biosphere, Hokkaido University, Higashimuro, Wakayama 649-4563, Japan
3
Graduate School of Agriculture and Life Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2021, 12(2), 210; https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020210
Submission received: 24 December 2020 / Revised: 7 February 2021 / Accepted: 8 February 2021 / Published: 10 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Responses of Forest Ecosystems to Nitrogen Deposition)

Abstract

:
Nitrogen (N) deposition is expected to influence forests. The effects of large-scale N fertilization on canopy layer insect–plant interactions in stands of tall, atmospheric nitrogen (N2)-fixing tree species have never been assessed. We conducted a large-scale fertilization experiment (100 kg N ha−1 year−1 applied to approximately 9 ha) over three years (2012–2014) in a cool temperate forest in northern Japan. Our goal was to evaluate relational responses between alder (Alnus hirsuta [Turcz.]) and their insect herbivores to N deposition. Specifically, we assessed leaf traits (N concentration, C:N ratio, condensed tannin concentration, and leaf mass per unit area (LMA)) and herbivory by three feeding guilds (leaf damage by chewers and the densities of gallers and miners) between the fertilized site and an unfertilized control. Fertilization led to increased galler density in spring 2013 and increased leaf damage by chewers in late summer 2014. For leaf traits, the LMA decreased in spring 2013 and late summer 2014, and the C:N ratio decreased in late summer 2013. The N and condensed tannin concentrations remained unchanged throughout the study period. There was a negative correlation between LMA and leaf damage by chewers, but LMA was not correlated with galler density. These results show that large-scale N fertilization had a positive plant-mediated (i.e., indirect) effect on leaf damage by chewers via a decrease in LMA in the canopy layer. Changes in physical defenses in canopy leaves may be a mechanism by which N fertilization affects the herbivory in tall N2-fixing trees.

1. Introduction

The effects of enhanced atmospheric nitrogen (N2) deposition, a result of increased anthropogenic activities, on terrestrial ecosystem processes is a growing environmental problem [1,2]. Enhanced deposition leads to changes in plant community composition, decreases in plant diversity, and altered nitrogen (N) cycling [3,4,5,6]. There are several potential mechanisms by which deposition affects terrestrial ecosystem processes. Deposited N can act as a fertilizer, directly stimulating plant growth and increasing the N content in plant tissue; many studies have focused on this phenomenon [7]. On the other hand, N deposition may indirectly affect plant communities and terrestrial ecosystems by modifying plant–insect interactions [7,8]. Because increased N deposition can affect ecosystem processes directly (e.g., nutrient cycling [9]) or indirectly (e.g., causing shifts in herbivory resulting from altered host plant traits), more consideration should be given to changes in plant–insect interactions following increased N deposition, in order to fully understand N deposition effects on terrestrial ecosystem processes.
Many studies have shown that shifts in leaf traits, such as an increase in foliar N content and/or a decrease in carbon (C)-based chemical defenses, which can be caused by increased N deposition, positively affect the performance and/or abundance of insect herbivores, including Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera, and Coleoptera [10,11,12,13,14]. However, these studies have been based on small-scale ecosystem manipulations [10,12,15]. Experiments employing open-top chambers and N fertilization in <10 m × 10 m field plots [10,12,15] have important limitations, such as the lamp effect, wherein insects that prefer the conditions of a treated site (e.g., moths) congregate at an artificially high density, while others avoid the site due to those same conditions [16]. Thus, extrapolating data obtained from small-scale experiments to predicting the effects of these changes at large scales will not yield robust results. To avoid these limitations, N deposition studies should focus on large-scale manipulations and examine how N fertilization affects the performance and/or abundance of insect herbivores [17,18].
Plant tissues often have much lower N levels than herbivorous insect tissues [19]. N-containing nutrients in plant tissues are often a limiting factor for insect herbivores, either because of limited resource utilization, a high population density, or both [13,20]. According to the C-nutrient balance (CNB) hypothesis, when N is abundant, more C is allocated to growth than to C-based chemical defenses (e.g., condensed tannins and total phenolics) in plants [21,22]. Thus, the majority of N deposition studies have focused solely on changes in nutrients and C-based chemical defenses. However, N fertilization could also affect the hardness and thickness of foliage (i.e., leaf mass per unit area (LMA)) because elevated N enhances photosynthesis more than growth; thus, LMA may decrease [23]. It is probable that N fertilization could lead to shifts in leaf traits to the advantage of insect herbivores, not only by decreasing chemical defenses, but also by reducing physical defenses—specifically, the toughness and thickness of leaves. LMA has been shown to be a significant component of leaf toughness. Leaf toughness is widely recognized as one of the most effective forms of physical defense in leaves [24,25].
Numerous N fertilization experiments were conducted using N-limited species, which indicated that shifts in foliar chemical and nutritional status could affect plant–insect interactions, specifically with insect herbivores [7]. Alder (Alnus) species have a greater potential to accumulate N (mg/g) in their tissues than other species, owing to their N2-fixing traits, in association with symbiotic Frankia species (alder, >25 mg/g; oak, 15–25 mg/g; pine, 12–17 mg/g) [26]. Alder species are typically the largest natural pathway for N input in certain forest types [27,28]. Given the research focus on N-limited species, it remains unclear how the leaf traits of N2-fixing plants may be affected by increased N deposition, and how, in turn, plant–insect interactions may be affected, even when N fertilization promotes plant growth [29,30].
Classifying herbivorous insects into ecologically and evolutionarily related feeding guilds [31] allows for comparisons and generalizations that cannot be made using taxonomic groups alone [9,32]. In an insect herbivore community, chewers are external herbivores and gallers and miners are internal herbivores. These guilds (i.e., chewers, gallers, and miners) may respond differently to N fertilization. For example, N fertilization was shown to affect chewer performance (body size, development time, and survival) as a result of altered plant traits (increased N content and decreased C-based chemical defenses) [7]. By contrast, other studies showed no effect of N fertilization on the density and growth rate of the galler Eurosta solidaginis [33], and the abundance and diversity of miners [34]. A thorough understanding of insect herbivore responses to N fertilization requires assessing the responses of major feeding guilds on the same host plant.
Here, we report the first manipulative test of large-scale N fertilization effects on alder, an N2-fixing species, and its insect herbivores. We aimed to determine how fertilization affects leaf traits in canopy-sized trees and their interactions with insect herbivores. We asked how large-scale fertilization influences leaf traits in mature alder, how fertilization affects the three major insect feeding guilds, and if certain interactions between leaf traits and feed guilds are affected by N fertilization.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description and Study Species

This study was conducted in Tomakomai Experimental Forest, Hokkaido University, Japan (42°40′ N, 141°36′ E). The forest is formed on a 2 m deep volcanic ash layer that accumulated following the eruptions of Mt. Tarumae in 1699 and 1739; soils are very shallow [35]. The study area was divided into control (~10 ha) and treatment (fertilized) (~9 ha) compartments (sites). Tree basal area was investigated in four plots (20 m × 20 m) at each site; we found no difference between the control (27.5 ± 4.6 cm/m2) and the fertilized sites (24.8 ± 4.6 cm/m2) using a t-test (t = 0.827; p = 0.440). The dominant tree species at the study site were Quercus crispula, Acer mono, Sorbus alnifolia, and Tilia japonica [36]. Mature tall alder (Alnus hirsuta [Turcz.]) trees were the focus of our study. The alder trees were not suppressed by surrounding trees, and the distances between the trees were more than 10 m. The buds typically open in early spring (late April or early May) and the leaves emerge twice per year—in spring (early leaves) and in late summer (late leaves) [37].

2.2. Large-Scale N Fertilization Experiment

The fertilized site (~9 ha) was fertilized with a urea solution (100 kg N ha−1 year−1; CO[NH2]2) designed for dry application; it was applied to simulate a pulse of N input as rain melts the urea into the soil. The fertilizer was distributed by helicopter in 2013 (April 15 and 16) and manually in 2014 (April 21 and 22). Akata et al. [38] found that the N fertilization experiment had a larger diameter and high nitrogen concentrations in fine roots of oak species and dissolved organic carbon in soil. We did not have site replications, because individual trees could be considered as independent within and between the treatments. When conducting field experiments, the best way to do this is to create replications of sites, but if this is difficult to conduct such as in large-scale experiments, and individuals can be considered as replications, this can be another option [39,40]. Moreover, we had a limited number of alder trees in the study site, although it was worth-studying them due to their specific N2-fixing traits.

2.3. Estimation of Leaf Traits

We assessed 10 mature (>10 m in height) alder trees (diameter at breast height (DBH) = 30.7 ± 7.5 cm in the control site (n = 5) and 24.0 ± 4.6 cm in the fertilized site (n = 5) growing along roads through the control and fertilized compartments. One tree from the fertilized site died in 2014 and was thus excluded. During each sampling period, two branches (1 cm in diameter) were randomly sampled from the canopy of each tree using a crane car. All branches were located on the top of the canopy and were fully exposed to sunlight. Samples were collected from the selected trees from 2012–2014, including a visit on June 28–29, 2012, prior to N fertilization, which was used as a preliminary assessment period. Otherwise, sampling was conducted during early and late periods in each year, on June 17–18 and September 17–18, 2013, and June 19–20 and August 27–28, 2014, respectively, because the seasonal fluctuation of moth communities including chewers and gallers showed two large peaks in mid-June and early to mid-August in our study site [41].
Leaf traits (N concentration, C:N ratio, condensed tannin concentration (a measure of C-based defense), and LMA) were determined from at least five leaves randomly collected from the two sampled branches from each tree. LMA was calculated using:
LMA   =   W d r y   /   A a r e a
where Wdry is the mass of leaves dried at 60 °C for 48 h, and Aarea is the leaf area, calculated from leaf disks obtained by leaf punching (1.5 cm in diameter). Dried samples were maintained in an oven at 40 °C for another week, then ground to a fine powder using an analytical mill with a micro-smasher to assess leaf traits. C:N ratio was used as an indicator of C-based chemical defenses [21]. The leaf N concentration and C:N ratio were determined using an NC analyzer (Sumigraph NC-900; Sumika Chemical Analysis Service, Osaka, Japan). The condensed tannin concentration was determined using the method described by Julkunen–Tiitto [42].

2.4. Insect Herbivore Feeding Guilds

We collected 364 individuals accounting for 33 species of Coleoptera, Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, and Lepidoptera (Table S1).
Three major feeding guilds (chewers, gallers, and miners) were used to assess the community-level response to N fertilization. Feeding guilds are closely related to host specificity: chewers are generalist herbivores, whereas gallers and miners are specialists [43]. The three feeding guilds were assessed in 10 randomly selected current-year shoots obtained from the two canopy branches (diameter 1 cm) taken from each tree. First, leaf damage by chewers was defined as the percentage of leaf area chewed with respect to the total leaf area and was scored visually using six categories: 0% = 0, 1–10% = 1, 11–25% = 2, 26–50% = 3, 51–75% = 4, and 76–100% = 5 [44,45]. The median of each group was used in the statistical analysis of leaf damage by chewers (i.e., 0, 5, 18, 38, 63, and 88%, respectively). We then counted the number of gallers and miners on each shoot to determine their respective densities.

2.5. Statistical Analyses

Differences in leaf traits (N concentration, C:N ratio, condensed tannin concentration, and LMA) and guild-level insect herbivory (leaf damage by chewers and the respective densities of gallers and miners) were compared between the control and fertilized sites before and after N fertilization using t-tests. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to assess correlations between leaf traits and feeding guilds that were significantly altered by N fertilization. All variables were tested for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test, and non-normal variables were log-transformed. All statistical analyses were conducted using R version 2.9.2 [46].

3. Results

3.1. Effect of N Fertilization on Leaf Traits

Prior to the first application of N in early 2012, there were no significant differences in any of the leaf traits between the control and fertilized treatment (p > 0.050, t-test; Figure 1). Following N fertilization, there was a significant decrease in C:N ratio in late 2013 (t = 3.537, p = 0.007, Figure 1B), and in LMA in early 2013 (t = 2.610, p = 0.003, Figure 1C) and marginally in late 2014 (t = 1.982, p = 0.080, Figure 1C). There were no significant differences in N concentration (p > 0.050, Figure 1A) and condensed tannin concentration (p > 0.050, Figure 1D) between the control and fertilization treatment throughout the study period, which included two years following N fertilization.

3.2. Insect Herbivore Responses

As with leaf traits, no significant differences in leaf damage and galler or miner density were detected between the control and fertilization site prior to N fertilization (p > 0.050, Figure 2). Following N fertilization, there was a significant increase in leaf damage by chewers in late 2014 (t = −2.571, p = 0.037, Figure 2A). Galler density decreased marginally in early 2013 (t = 2.221, p = 0.057, Figure 2B). There was no difference in miner density between the control and fertilized sites throughout the study period (p > 0.050, t-test; Figure 2C).

3.3. Correlation Analysis between Leaf Traits and Insect Herbivory

We assessed correlations in the variables (LMA in early 2013 and late 2014, C:N ratio in late 2013, leaf damage by chewers in late 2014, and galler density in early 2013) that were significantly or marginally altered following N fertilization. There was a negative correlation between LMA and leaf damage by chewers in late 2014 (r = −0.887, p = 0.001, Figure 3). However, LMA was not correlated with galler density in early 2013 (p > 0.05). The timing of changes in C:N ratio and herbivory by any feeding guild did not align in any sampling period.

4. Discussion

Large-scale N fertilization led to a decrease in the C:N ratio and LMA in mature A. hirsuta, an N2-fixing species, and an increase in leaf damage by chewers and a decrease in the density of gallers, at least once during the study period; although other leaf traits (i.e., N and condensed tannin concentrations) remained unchanged throughout the study period. We found a negative relationship between LMA and leaf damage by chewers, but LMA was not correlated with the density of gallers. Our results suggest that large-scale N fertilization may have a positive, indirect (plant-mediated) effect on leaf damage by chewers, via a decrease in physical defense (LMA) in the canopy leaves of mature alder trees.
Interestingly, although we found no effect on N and condensed tannin concentrations, Koike et al. [15] reported that N addition led to a decrease in C:N ratio and chemical defense compounds, such as total phenolics and condensed tannin, in alder saplings. This discrepancy may be related to maturity and plant size. The responses of woody plants to shifting site conditions may vary depending on their stage of development [47,48,49,50]. In Q. crispula, N fertilization was shown to influence leaf traits (e.g., N, C:N, and condensed tannins) in two-year-old seedlings [15], but not in mature trees [51]. Given that our study employed a large-scale manipulation, which avoided issues such as the lamp effect [16], our findings suggest the actual effects of large-scale global change in N deposition [52]. However, no clear conclusions on the responses of secondary defense compounds can be drawn by the present study, because only tannins were measured, and future research should include a broad range of secondary metabolites.
LMA has been shown to decrease following N fertilization [13,52], especially when plant nutrients are limited [53,54]. In our study, N fertilization decreased the LMA of A. hirsuta (N2-fixing species) (Figure 1). Ruess et al. [55] also reported that N-fertilization significantly decreased leaf thickness of thin-leaf alder (A. tenuifolia), due to the down-regulation of N-fixation. The decrease in LMA may be driven primarily by a shift from N to C limitation in the fertilized site—carbon allocated in leaf growth is partitioned to increase leaf area though the production of thinner leaves.
Lee et al. [56] showed that large-scale N fertilization enhanced leaf quality (e.g., increase in N concentration and decrease in C:N ratio) in mature oak trees >10 m in height. These results are contrary to our findings with A. hirsuta (only C:N ratio), and may be reflective of differences in the severity of N deficiency between N-limited and N2-fixing species. N-limited species may be more sensitive to N fertilization than N-fixing species because of more N deficiency. Furthermore, leaf density and/or thickness reflect variation in anatomical structure arising from environmental conditions and species traits [57], although the role of physiological regulation in determining leaf traits remains unclear [23].
Major feeding guilds of insect herbivores may respond differently to N deposition-induced changes in the quality of their host plants [20]. Most previous studies have suggested that N fertilization affects chewer insects by altering chemical and nutritional qualities [10,11,12,13,14], whereas gallers and miners have been more poorly studied [13]. To assess insect herbivore responses to N fertilization, we assessed how each of the three major feeding guilds were affected on the same host plants and found that large-scale N fertilization significantly increased leaf damage by chewers (Figure 2). Leaf damage was negatively associated with LMA (Figure 3). As a physical defense, LMA has been reported to influence the performance of chewers [13,54,58,59]. These results suggest a mechanism by which large-scale N fertilization affects leaf damage by chewers on mature alder—through changes in physical defenses. Additionally, our results indicate that N fertilization marginally decreased galler density (Figure 2), as opposed to Hartley and Lawton’s findings [33], which suggested that leaf N concentration was not correlated with the density of the gall midge Eurosta solidaginis. It appears that N deposition-related changes in plant quality did not affect galler density because density was not associated with any of the assessed leaf traits. Several review papers have suggested the possibility of N deposition-mediated changes in herbivore susceptibility to predators as an important mechanism [7,8], although only a few studies have explored this. The decrease in galler density after N deposition may be related to changes in plant volatiles that are essential for successful foraging and attacks by predators. Our understanding of this mechanism remains limited, and we strongly encourage future work on the effect of N deposition on the susceptibility of insect herbivores to predation.

5. Conclusions

Our large-scale N fertilization experiment is the first manipulative study on tall N2-fixing trees and their insect herbivores. Fertilization has a positive, plant-mediated effect on leaf damage by chewers via a decrease in physical defense (LMA). Our study provides valuable information on large-scale N fertilization (i.e., N deposition) effects on insect–plant interactions in N2-fixing plants, which may be helpful in predicting future climate change impacts.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/2/210/s1, Table S1: List of herbivory species collected in this study.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, J.L.; writing—review and editing, M.N. and T.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was partly supported by JSPS [grant number 2529207903 to TH] and by the National Institute of Ecology [NIE-C-2021-46] in Korea.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank the members of Tomakomai Experimental Forest (TOEF) for help in N fertilization experiments and sampling.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bobbink, R.; Hornung, M.; Roelofs, J.G. The effects of air-borne nitrogen pollutants on species diversity in natural and semi-natural European vegetation. J. Ecol. 1998, 86, 717–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rockström, J.; Steffen, W.; Noone, K.; Persson, A.; Chapin, F.S., III; Lambin, E.F.; Lenton, T.M.; Scheffer, M.; Folke, C.; Schellnhuber, H.J.; et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 2009, 461, 472–475. [Google Scholar]
  3. Aber, J.D.; Magill, A.; Mcnulty, S.G.; Boone, R.D.; Nadelhoffer, K.J.; Downs, M.; Hallett, R. Forest biogeochemistry and primary production altered by nitrogen saturation. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1995, 85, 1665–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Fenn, M.E.; Baron, J.S.; Allen, E.B.; Rueth, H.M.; Nydick, K.R.; Geiser, L.; Bowman, W.D.; Sickman, J.O.; Meixner, T.; Johnson, D.W.; et al. Ecological effects of nitrogen deposition in the western United States. BioScience 2003, 53, 404–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jones, M.E.; Paine, T.D.; Fenn, M.E. The effect of nitrogen additions on oak foliage and herbivore communities at sites with high and low atmospheric pollution. Envion. Pollut. 2008, 151, 434–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tilman, D. Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients. Ecol. Monogr. 1987, 57, 189–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Throop, H.L.; Lerdau, M.T. Effects of nitrogen deposition on insect herbivory: Implications for community and ecosystem processes. Ecosystems 2004, 7, 109–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, Y.; Olson, D.M.; Ruberson, J.R. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on tritrophic interactions. Arthropod Plant Interact. 2010, 4, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Andrew, N.R.; Hughes, L. Herbivore damage along a latitudinal gradient: Relative impacts of different feeding guilds. Oikos 2005, 108, 176–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dittrich, A.D.; Helden, A.J. Experimental sward islets: The effect of dung and fertilisation on Hemiptera and Araneae. Insect Conserv. Divers. 2012, 5, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hargrove, W.W.; Crossley, D.A., Jr.; Seastedt, T.R. Shifts in insect herbivory in the canopy of black locust, Robinia pseudacacia, after fertilization. Oikos 1984, 43, 322–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jones, M.E.; Fenn, M.E.; Paine, T.D. The effect of nitrogen additions on bracken fern and its insect herbivores at sites with high and low atmospheric pollution. Arthropod Plant Interact. 2011, 5, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Kytö, M.; Niemelä, P. Larsson S Insects on trees: Population and individual response to fertilization. Oikos 1996, 75, 148–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Scriber, J.M.; Slansky, F., Jr. The nutritional ecology of immature insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1981, 26, 183–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Koike, T.; Tobita, H.; Shibata, T.; Matsuki, S.; Konno, K.; Kitao, M.; Yamashita, N.; Maruyama, Y. Defense characteristics of several deciduous broad-leaved tree seedlings grown under differing levels of CO2 and nitrogen. Popul. Ecol. 2006, 48, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Moise, E.R.; Henry, H.A. Like moths to a street lamp: Exaggerated animal densities in plot−level global change field experiments. Oikos 2010, 119, 791–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Englund, G.; Cooper, S.D. Scale effects and extrapolation in ecological experiments. Adv. Ecol. Res. 2003, 33, 161–213. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fay, T.M.; Turner, E.C.; Basset, Y.; Ewers, R.M.; Glen, R.; Novotny, V. Whole-ecosystem experimental manipulations of tropical forests. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2015, 30, 334–346. [Google Scholar]
  19. Southwood, T. Insect/plant relationship—An evolutionary perspective. In Insect-Plant Relationships; Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 1972; pp. 3–30. [Google Scholar]
  20. Awmack, C.S.; Leather, S.R. Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2002, 47, 817–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bryant, J.P.; Chapin, F.S., III; Klein, D.R. Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 1983, 40, 357–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Coley, P.D.; Bryant, J.P.; Chapin, F.S. Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 1985, 230, 895–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Poorter, H.; Niinemets, Ü.; Poorter, L.; Wright, I.J. Villar R Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): A meta-analysis. New Phytol. 2009, 182, 565–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Webber, B.L.; Woodrow, I.E. In Intra-plant variation in cyanogenesis and the continuum of foliar plant defense traits in the rainforest tree Ryparosa kurrangii (Achariaceae). Tree Physiol. 2008, 28, 977–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Webber, B.L.; Woodrow, I.E. Chemical and physical plant defence across multiple ontogenetic stages in a tropical rain forest understorey tree. J Ecol. 2009, 97, 761–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Stefan, K.; Fürst, A.; Hacker, R.; Bartels, U. Forest Foliar Condition in Europe. Results of Large-Scale Foliar Chemistry Surveys 1995; EC-UN/ECE-FBVA: Brussels, Belgium; Geneva, Switzerland, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  27. Perakis, S.S.; Matkins, J.J.; Hibbs, D.E. N2-fixing red alder indirectly accelerates ecosystem nitrogen cycling. Ecosystems 2012, 15, 1182–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rytter, L.; Arveby, A.S.; Granhall, U. Dinitrogen (C2H2) fixation in relation to nitrogen fertilization of grey alder [Alnus incana (L.) Moench.] plantations in a peat bog. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1991, 10, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gaulke, L.S.; Henry, C.L.; Brown, S.L. Nitrogen fixation and growth response of Alnus rubra following fertilization with urea or biosolids. Sci. Agric. 2006, 63, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Troelstra, S.R.; Wagenaar, R.; Smant, W. Growth of actinorhizal plants as influenced by the form of nitrogen with special reference to Myrica gale and Alnus glutinosa. J. Exp. Bot. 1992, 43, 1349–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Simberloff, D.; Dayan, T. The Guild Concept and the Structure of Ecological Communities. Annu. Rev. Eco. Syst. 1991, 22, 115–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Landsberg, J.; Smith, M.S. A functional scheme for predicting the outbreak potential of herbivorous insects under global atmospheric change. Aust. J. Bot. 1992, 40, 565–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hartley, S.E.; Lawton, J.H. Host-plant manipulation by gall-insects: A test of the nutrition hypothesis. J. Anim. Ecol. 1992, 61, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Faeth, S.H.; Mopper, S.; Simberloff, D. Abundances and diversity of leaf-mining insects on three oak host species: Effects of host-plant phenology and nitrogen content of leaves. Oikos 1981, 37, 238–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shibata, H.; Kirikae, M.; Tanaka, Y.; Sakuma, T.; Hatano, R. Proton budgets of forest ecosystems on volcanogenous regosols in Hokkaido, Northern Japan. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1998, 105, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hiura, T. Stochasticity of species assemblage of canopy trees and understory plants in a temperate secondary forest created by major disturbances. Ecol. Res. 2001, 16, 887–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kikuzawa, K. Leaf survival and evolution in Betulaceae. Ann. Bot. 1982, 50, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ataka, M.; Sun, L.; Nakaji, T.; Katayama, A.; Hiura, T. Five-year nitrogen addition affects fine root exudation and its correlation with root respiration in a dominant species, Quercus crispula, of a cool temperate forest, Japan. Tree Physiol. 2020, 40, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Oksanen, L. Logic of experiments in ecology: Is pseudoreplication a pseudoissue? Oikos 2001, 94, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Colegrave, N.; Ruxton, G.D. Using biological insight and pragmatism when thinking about pseudoreplication. Trends Ecol Evol. 2018, 33, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yoshida, K. Seasonal fluctuation of moth community in Tomakomai Experiment Forest of Hokkaido University. Res. Bull. Hokkaido Univ. For. 1980, 37, 675–685. [Google Scholar]
  42. Julkunen-Tiitto, R. Phenolic constituents in the leaves of northern willows: Methods for the analysis of certain phenolics. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1985, 33, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Barton, K.E.; Valkama, E.; Vehviläinen, H.; Ruohomäki, K.; Knight, T.M.; Koricheva, J. Additive and non-additive effects of birch genotypic diversity on arthropod herbivory in a long-term field experiment. Oikos 2015, 124, 697–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kudo, G. Herbivory pattern and induced responses to simulated herbivory in Quercus mongolica var. grosseserrata. Ecol. Res. 1996, 11, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nakamura, M.; Hina, T.; Nabeshima, E.; Hiura, T. Do spatial variation in leaf traits and herbivory within a canopy respond to selective cutting and fertilization? Can. J. For. Res. 2008, 38, 1603–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. R Development Core Team R. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  47. Augspurger, C.K.; Bartlett, E.A. Differences in leaf phenology between juvenile and adult trees in a temperate deciduous forest. Tree Physiol. 2003, 23, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Delagrange, S.; Messier, C.; Lechowicz, M.J.; Dizengremel, P. Physiological, morphological and allocational plasticity in understory deciduous trees: Importance of plant size and light availability. Tree Physiol. 2004, 24, 775–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Vitasse, Y. Ontogenic changes rather than difference in temperature cause understory trees to leaf out earlier. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Weiner, J.; Thomas, S.C. The nature of tree growth and the “age-related decline in forest productivity”. Oikos 2001, 94, 374–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Struve, D.K. A review of shade tree nitrogen fertilization research in the United States. J. Arboric. 2002, 28, 252–263. [Google Scholar]
  52. Coley, P.D. Herbivory and defensive characteristics of tree species in a lowland tropical forest. Ecol. Monogr. 1983, 53, 209–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bussotti, F.; Borghini, F.; Celesti, C.; Leonzio, C.; Bruschi, P. Leaf morphology and macronutrients in broadleaved trees in central Italy. Trees 2000, 14, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sardans, J.; Peñuelas, J.; Rodà, F. Plasticity of leaf morphological traits, leaf nutrient content, and water capture in the Mediterranean evergreen oak Quercus ilex subsp. ballota in response to fertilization and changes in competitive conditions. Ecoscience 2006, 13, 258–270. [Google Scholar]
  55. Ruess, R.W.; Anderson, M.D.; McFarland, J.M.; Kielland, K.; Olson, K.; Taylor, D.L. Ecosystem−level consequences of symbiont partnerships in an N-fixing shrub from interior Alaskan floodplains. Ecol Monogr. 2013, 83, 177–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Lee, J.; Nakumara, M.; Hiura, T. Does large-scale N fertilization have time-delayed effect on insects community structure by changing oak quantity and quality. Arthropod Plant Interact. 2017, 11, 515–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Witkowski, E.T.F.; Lamont, B.B. Leaf specific mass confounds leaf density and thickness. Oecologia 1991, 88, 486–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Clissold, F.J.; Sanson, G.D.; Read, J. The paradoxical effects of nutrient ratios and supply rates on an outbreaking insect herbivore, the Australian plague locust. J. Anim. Ecol. 2006, 75, 1000–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Clissold, F.J.; Sanson, G.D.; Read, J.; Simpson, S.J. Gross vs. net income: How plant toughness affects performance of an insect herbivore. Ecology 2009, 90, 3393–3405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Changes in leaf nutrients of alder trees. (A) Nitrogen content, (B) C/N ratio, (C) leaf mass per area (LMA), and (D) condensed tannin in the leaves of alder trees at the control (empty boxes, n = 5) and fertilized (filed boxes, n = 5) sites from 2012 (before N fertilization) to 2014. E and L indicate early and late seasons. Each point is mean ± SE and the p-values are the results of t-tests (ns, p > 0.05).
Figure 1. Changes in leaf nutrients of alder trees. (A) Nitrogen content, (B) C/N ratio, (C) leaf mass per area (LMA), and (D) condensed tannin in the leaves of alder trees at the control (empty boxes, n = 5) and fertilized (filed boxes, n = 5) sites from 2012 (before N fertilization) to 2014. E and L indicate early and late seasons. Each point is mean ± SE and the p-values are the results of t-tests (ns, p > 0.05).
Forests 12 00210 g001
Figure 2. Changes in the three major guilds of insect herbivores categorized based on feeding type. (A) Leaf damage by chewers, (B) galler density, and (C) miner density on trees in control (empty boxes, n = 5) and fertilized (filed boxes, n = 5) sites from 2012 (before N fertilization) to 2014. E and L indicate early and late seasons. Each point is mean ± SE and the p-values are the results of t-tests (ns, p > 0.05).
Figure 2. Changes in the three major guilds of insect herbivores categorized based on feeding type. (A) Leaf damage by chewers, (B) galler density, and (C) miner density on trees in control (empty boxes, n = 5) and fertilized (filed boxes, n = 5) sites from 2012 (before N fertilization) to 2014. E and L indicate early and late seasons. Each point is mean ± SE and the p-values are the results of t-tests (ns, p > 0.05).
Forests 12 00210 g002
Figure 3. Pearson’s correlation between the LMA and leaf damage by chewers in late 2014. Circles in white and black indicate control and fertilized trees, respectively. Regression results and the line of best fit are indicated.
Figure 3. Pearson’s correlation between the LMA and leaf damage by chewers in late 2014. Circles in white and black indicate control and fertilized trees, respectively. Regression results and the line of best fit are indicated.
Forests 12 00210 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, J.; Nakamura, M.; Hiura, T. Effects of Large-Scale Nitrogen Fertilization on Insect–Plant Interactions in the Canopy of Tall Alder Trees with N2-Fixing Traits in a Cool Temperate Forest. Forests 2021, 12, 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020210

AMA Style

Lee J, Nakamura M, Hiura T. Effects of Large-Scale Nitrogen Fertilization on Insect–Plant Interactions in the Canopy of Tall Alder Trees with N2-Fixing Traits in a Cool Temperate Forest. Forests. 2021; 12(2):210. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020210

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Jin, Masahiro Nakamura, and Tsutom Hiura. 2021. "Effects of Large-Scale Nitrogen Fertilization on Insect–Plant Interactions in the Canopy of Tall Alder Trees with N2-Fixing Traits in a Cool Temperate Forest" Forests 12, no. 2: 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020210

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop