Next Article in Journal
Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule (EpCAM) Expression in Human Tumors: A Comparison with Pan-Cytokeratin and TROP2 in 14,832 Tumors
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of QRS Complex and ST-Segment in Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Prediction in Patients with ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction: A 6-Year Follow-Up Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

PET/CT Imaging of Infectious Diseases: Overview of Novel Radiopharmaceuticals

by
Ferdinando F. Calabria
1,*,
Giuliana Guadagnino
2,
Andrea Cimini
3 and
Mario Leporace
1
1
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Theragnostics, “Mariano Santo” Hospital, 87100 Cosenza, Italy
2
Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, St. Annunziata Hospital, 87100 Cosenza, Italy
3
Nuclear Medicine Unit, St Salvatore Hospital, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2024, 14(10), 1043; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14101043
Submission received: 6 April 2024 / Revised: 10 May 2024 / Accepted: 15 May 2024 / Published: 17 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Imaging and Theranostics)

Abstract

:
Infectious diseases represent one of the most common causes of hospital admission worldwide. The diagnostic work-up requires a complex clinical approach, including laboratory data, CT and MRI, other imaging tools, and microbiologic cultures. PET/CT with 18F-FDG can support the clinical diagnosis, allowing visualization of increased glucose metabolism in activated macrophages and monocytes; this tracer presents limits in differentiating between aseptic inflammation and infection. Novel PET radiopharmaceuticals have been developed to overcome these limits; 11C/18F-labeled bacterial agents, several 68Ga-labeled molecules, and white blood cells labeled with 18F-FDG are emerging PET tracers under study, showing interesting preliminary results. The best choice among these tracers can be unclear. This overview aims to discuss the most common diagnostic applications of 18F-FDG PET/CT in infectious diseases and, as a counterpoint, to describe and debate the advantages and peculiarities of the latest PET radiopharmaceuticals in the field of infectious diseases, which will probably improve the diagnosis and prognostic stratification of patients with active infectious diseases.

1. Introduction

Infectious diseases represent one of the most common causes of hospital admission in the world [1]. Usually, the diagnosis is reached by a clinical approach, including laboratory data, X-ray, other imaging tools, and microbiologic cultures. However, in some patients, the infectious process cannot be adequately identified with conventional imaging; in this clinical setting, nuclear medicine can be of help, allowing the identification of infectious foci with Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) and/or Positron Emission Tomography (PET); both scans allow the precise identification of infectious diseases and permit the assessment of response to therapy, with diagnostic accuracy superior to that of CT and MR imaging [2].
Moreover, the co-registration with CT, generally performed as a low-dose scan, allows the adequate depiction of localization and extension of the infectious focus, the involvement of surrounding tissues (i.e., the skeleton), and possible distant septic emboli [3,4].
Due to the worldwide distribution of hybrid scanners, PET/CT imaging of infectious diseases has been proven to be useful in the management of such patients, with the added value of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]-fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG). Being an analogue of glucose, 18F-FDG is taken up in inflammatory cells actively participating in the immune-inflammatory cascade, such as monocytes, macrophages and neutrophils [5], due to the local up-regulation of glucose transporters caused by inflammatory mediators, leading to high intracellular 18F-FDG accumulation.
Therefore, 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging is currently useful in the management of patients with systemic diseases or regional infectious diseases such as infection of vascular grafts [6], prosthetic joints [7], and device-related [8] infections, Fever of Unknown Origin (FUO) [9], granulomatosis [10], and endocarditis [11].
More recently, after the COVID-19 pandemic [12], 18F-FDG PET has also been hypothesized to have a feasible role in the detection and assessment of responses related to COVID-19 disease activity, holding significant clinical relevance due to the extreme versatility of 18F-FDG for its intrinsic molecular properties [13]. Beyond all of these cited features, as already known from oncologic studies, 18F-FDG PET suffers from a lack of specificity.
Both infectious and inflammatory diseases comprise a large number of different pathologies with heterogeneous clinical presentations, potentially confined to a precise district or with systemic involvement. 18F-FDG PET/CT is a very sensitive whole-body tool based on the relatively non-specific tracer uptake; moreover, in comparison with SPECT imaging with radiolabeled leukocytes, it is more rapid, with higher image resolution, and does not imply handling of blood. Nevertheless, this feature also represents the main limit of its use; in fact, the main advantage of 18F-FDG is also the basis for its diagnostic pitfalls and limitations. Its low specificity can hinder the differentiation between pathologic and physiologic uptake, particularly in the brain, liver, myocardium, and bladder [14]. Furthermore, the differentiation between aseptic inflammation and infectious foci can be difficult.
More specific PET radiopharmaceuticals, labeled with 18F and other nuclides such as 11C and 68Ga [15,16], are currently under study. These novel tracers have already shown promising features for the evaluation of systemic and/or localized infectious foci.
Our overview aims to discuss the most common diagnostic applications of 18F-FDG PET/CT in infectious diseases and, as a counterpoint, to describe and debate the latest radiopharmaceuticals in the field of hybrid PET/CT imaging of infectious diseases, which will probably improve the diagnosis and prognostic stratification of patients with active infectious diseases.

2. 18F-FDG in Infectious Diseases

The 18F-FDG uptake in infectious and inflammatory conditions follows the same metabolic pathway known for malignant lesions. The elevated rate of glucose metabolism in cells is mediated by the upregulation of the glucose transporter (GLUT), also representing the basis for the increased 18F-FDG uptake in monocytes, macrophages and neutrophils, in comparison to normal cells. After internalization in the cytoplasm, glucose is phosphorylated by the enzyme hexokinase to facilitate further processing through the glycolytic pathway, while 18F-FDG undergoes the same process. Due to the chemical differences, 18F-FDG-6-phosphate is not a substrate for the downstream enzymes in the glycolytic pathway [14], the process is not advanced further, and the tracer remains trapped inside the cell (Figure 1).

2.1. Prosthesis Joint Infection

Since 18F-FDG uptake persists in prosthesis joint infection cases, PET/CT can help in differentiating aseptic loosening from infection. Several studies demonstrated that 18F-FDG PET/CT shows good diagnostic accuracy in the detection of prosthesis infection, with high sensitivity and specificity [17,18]. This is because activated macrophages continue to accumulate 18F-FDG in chronic infection.
In particular, PET/CT imaging with 18F-FDG can provide additional information over conventional modalities by adding information on the disease extent in the bone as well as in the whole body, giving an idea of active pathology at the molecular level, and in the evaluation of response to therapy [19].
Therefore, some authors support its usefulness in the diagnosis and monitoring of infection in hip and knee prostheses, with a diagnostic accuracy superior to that of scintigraphy with labeled leukocytes [20,21]. On the other hand, it is important to state that a lack of specificity must be kept in consideration when examining patients with chronic prosthetic joint infections with 18F-FDG PET/CT; for this reason, authors from a multidisciplinary panel suggest that accurate diagnosis can be prospectively obtained with a diagnostic algorithm including multi-modal radionuclide imaging, involving 99Tc-phosphate SPECT/CT, 111In-labeled leukocytes and 99Tc-nanocoll bone marrow SPECT/CT, and 18F-FDG PET/CT. This approach could overcome the limits of all techniques before submitting patients to revision surgery of an infected prosthesis after total hip or knee arthroplasty [22].

2.2. Pulmonary Granulomatosis

Sarcoidosis is an idiopathic, granulomatous non-caseating disease generally involving the lungs and mediastinal lymph nodes but potentially affecting all organs. The clinical outcome is variable, with a significant percentage of patients needing systemic treatment [23]. PET/CT with 18F-FDG enables tracer uptake in granulomatous cells producing the inflammation seen in sarcoidosis, with good sensitivity in the detection of mediastinal and extra-thoracic lesions [24]. On this basis, hybrid PET/CT imaging is a valid method in the diagnosis and monitoring of response to therapy in patients with histologically proven sarcoidosis [25].
Tuberculosis is another granulomatous disease characterized by caseating lesions, still representing the leading cause of death from an infectious disease worldwide, among human-immunodeficiency virus (HIV) negative people and HIV-positive patients [26]. Mycobacterium tuberculosis remains one of the most lethal human pathogens since drug-resistant tuberculosis and HIV-related tuberculosis infection represent diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Considering that tuberculous granulomatous inflammation appears as 18F-FDG avid lesions on PET/CT scans [27], this tool enables the delineation of disease extent and assessment of occult extra-pulmonary lesions in whole-body imaging [28]. Furthermore, 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging is also effective in assessing treatment response during and after the therapy [28,29]. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging may be also useful in schistosomiasis, especially in the identification of infection sites: schistosomiasis is one of the most important parasitic infections in tropical and subtropical areas and represents a further cause of granulomatous disease, in which schistosome eggs trapped in organs lead to severe inflammatory reactions, including granulomas, appearing hypermetabolic on 18F-FDG PET/CT [30].

2.3. Vasculitis

18F-FDG PET/CT is an important component of the diagnostic work-up required for patients with large vessel vasculitis, such as Takayasu arteritis and giant cell arteritis. These diseases are vasculitis involving the aorta and/or large arteries. The presence of diffusely increased 18F-FDG activity along the aortic wall and its major branches may enable the diagnosis of patients with clinical signs and symptoms of vascular inflammation, with good sensitivity and specificity for Takayasu arteritis [31,32]. A late 18F-FDG PET-CT (performed during the first 10 days from the beginning of the treatment) can also help in assessing response to therapy [33]. Similar features are documented for giant cell arteritis [34], while its role is unclear in the management of smaller arteries, due to the low PET/CT power resolution limit.

2.4. Fever of Unknown Origin (FUO)

The diagnosis of fever of unknown origin (FUO) still represents a challenge, due to the complex clinical presentations of patients, also considering that the leading cause may be located anywhere throughout the body. 18F-FDG PET is involved in the frontline in the differential diagnosis of lymphoma or malignant neoplasms in patients with FUO and lymphadenopathies [35,36]. In this clinical setting, a whole-body PET/CT may suggest the diagnosis of a lymphoproliferative disorder by showing the pattern of distribution of tracer-avid lesions and displaying the best target for biopsy [37]. As reported above, 18F-FDG may also help in identifying the vasculitis potentially underlying the clinical onset in FUO [31].
Bacteriemia of unknown origin is a further condition linked to FUO, in which 18F-FDG PET may help the identification of the infectious focus, particularly in pediatric [38,39] or immunocompromised patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) [40].

2.5. Endocarditis and Cardiac Electronic Device Infections

Early diagnosis of endocarditis is crucial for optimal patient management, due to its high rates of mortality and morbidity [11]. The diagnosis can be difficult, involving a multidisciplinary discussion in addition to the integration of clinical signs, microbiology, and imaging data. Among imaging tools, 18F-FDG PET/CT is a valid approach to assessing the state of tracer distribution in the heart, also excluding other septic emboli or localizations, being a whole-body imaging tool. Thus, the European guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis have indeed incorporated intra-cardiac findings from 18F-FDG-PET/CT as major criteria for infective endocarditis [41].
The sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET/CT are respectively 86% and 84% [42,43]. Among other advantages, 18F-FDG PET enables the identification of possible portals of entry or the alternate diagnosis of infectious or inflammatory syndromes other than endocarditis. However, the high gradient of physiological distribution in some organs such as the brain and liver, and false negative results (i.e., after prolonged antibiotic therapy) limit the usefulness of 18F-FDG PET in this clinical setting [41].
Also, the presence of a cardiovascular implantable electronic device can be burdened by complications such as late infections, potentially associated with significant morbidity and mortality and requiring immediate treatment; some authors suggested that 18F-FDG PET/CT can be useful in the detection of infectious foci, due to its high sensitivity, easy repeatability and non-invasiveness [44].

2.6. Other Clinical Indications

For the reasons reported above, 18F-FDG PET/CT may have a more important role in managing osteomyelitis patients. This tracer is highly enhanced in chronic osteomyelitis cases because activated macrophages continue to accumulate 18F-FDG in chronic infection [45]. 18F-FDG PET has the highest diagnostic accuracy in chronic osteomyelitis, in comparison to bone scan, human-labeled leukocyte scan, and MRI [46].
Diabetic foot infection is among the most common complications of diabetes, frequently leading to serious sequelae such as amputation. The differentiation of osteomyelitis in diabetic foot from neuropathic osteoarthropathy is of the utmost importance; in fact, neuropathic osteoarthropathy demonstrates lower 18F-FDG metabolism compared to osteomyelitis. 18F-FDG PET/CT can show high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of diabetic foot infection and the detection of associated osteomyelitis, while scintigraphy with labeled white blood cells still plays the main diagnostic role in this field [47].

2.7. Limits of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Infectious Diseases

Activated human leukocytes in an inflammatory disease are characterized by high glucose consumption and, consequently, highly enhance 18F-FDG in PET imaging.
The use of 18F-FDG PET/CT to diagnose a wide range of patients with infectious or inflammatory diseases is growing. Nevertheless, using 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with such diseases presents some limits and pitfalls. We must consider that technical aspects linked to the acquisition protocol and quality imaging may underestimate the in vivo assessment of the disease under study. The power resolution limit of PET imaging is one of the most unfavorable aspects that needs to be taken into account, as it does not allow the identification of small infectious foci, as in the case of small vegetations at the root of acute infective endocarditis [41]. On the other hand, some organs, such as the liver and brain, present a high rate of physiological tracer distribution, which can hinder the recognition or the exact identification of a liver abscess [48] or encephalitis [49].
Moreover, all inflammatory and infectious diseases are linked to a more diffuse and less pathognomonic pattern of FDG uptake than malignant diseases [50]. However, to the best of our knowledge, patients referred to PET/CT with suspected infection or inflammation are rarely treatment-naïve and may have received varying doses of antibiotics, corticosteroids, or other immune-modulating drugs at the time of the scan.
All cited features lead to a higher rate of false positive 18F-FDG findings and also, in some cases, a lower sensitivity for the detection of active disease; we also must consider that other immune cells of the chronic inflammation, such as fibroblasts, may uptake 18F-FDG, thus potentially mimicking an infectious process. One of the major factors limiting the use of 18F-FDG PET in this field is the possibility of uptake in post-surgical procedures, occurring four weeks after a surgical intervention and/or acute injuries [51,52].
Finally, in some specific clinical indications such as the diagnosis of the diabetic foot infection, glucose serum levels at the time of the scan may negatively affect the sensitivity of the scan, causing false negative results.
In diabetic patients as well as in other subjects, the intrinsic properties of 18F-FDG as the analogue of glucose represent the major features in terms of diagnostic accuracy and, at the same time, the most relevant limit. In the last decade, the attention of researchers was focused on the development of novel molecular probes for the identification of infectious diseases. These novel molecular probes may be grouped by their molecular structures or their biological behavior. Due to the complexity of their mechanisms of action and their heterogeneity, we chose to describe the most important of these tracers, already tested for human use, with a classification based on the labeled nuclide rather than the involved biological molecule, to synthesize and classify all radiopharmaceuticals encountered in the literature.

3. 11C-Labeled Radiopharmaceuticals

Carbon-11 (11C) is an artificial radioisotope of carbon and one of the most widely used radionuclides in the PET imaging pharmacopeia, as carbon is present in any organic molecule. The incorporation of carbon-11 does not change the properties of the recipient molecule. Furthermore, given the short half-life (20 min), it is possible to administer more tracers in vivo on the same day [53]. This chapter will discuss the most accredited 11C-radiotracers in PET molecular imaging of bacterial infections (Figure 2).

3.1. D-methyl-11C-methionine (D-11C-Met)

In an attempt to select biomolecules capable of selectively identifying bacterial infections, some small molecules metabolized exclusively by bacteria were synthesized as PET radiopharmaceuticals. In this direction, unnatural D-amino acids have shown to be very promising as they are incorporated into bacterial cell membranes, as opposed to their L-amino acid counterparts that are building blocks of proteins in most mammalian cells [54,55]. Peptidoglycan is a polymer assembled in one or more layers in the bacterial wall and gives the cell shape and size by fixing its components [56]. In vitro studies with fluorescent D-amino acids demonstrated highly specific, rapid incorporation into the bacterial wall (~30 s in E. coli) [57].
In the first clinical study applied to humans, bio-distribution, dosimetry, and diagnostic efficacy in infected orthopedic prostheses were evaluated using D-methyl-11C-methionine (D-11C-Met) on PET/MRI scans. After administration, the first organs in which activity was manifested were the heart, lungs, and kidneys (within 4 min) and then decreased (within 20 min); rapid renal clearance was observed, with slow hepatobiliary clearance. Of note was the low absorption in the gastrointestinal system, where the normal bacterial flora resides, and in the musculoskeletal system, with evidently a good signal-to-noise ratio at the target sites. Low effective doses were reported, lower than those of L-11C-Met, which is widely used in oncology imaging. D-11C-Met uptake was shown to be approximately 1.5-fold higher in prosthetic joints with suspected infection than in the contralateral non-prosthetic joints [58].

3.2. 11C-para-aminobenzoic Acid (11C-PABA)

The demonstration that 11C-para-aminobenzoic acid (11C-PABA) is incorporated into tetrahydrofolate via the bacterial folate pathway has created the conditions for the synthesis of radiolabeled molecules that can be used in nuclear medical imaging [59,60,61]. 11C-PABA is used as a substrate by dihydropteroate synthase in the folate synthesis pathway and is subsequently trapped within bacteria [59]. 11C-PABA rapidly accumulates in a broad range of pathogenic bacteria and their clinical strains, including multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO), and is able to detect sites of infection in both the mouse model of Escherichia coli myositis and detect and identify Staphylococcus aureus. In a study with healthy human participants [62], 11C-PABA was safe and well tolerated with a favorable dosimetric profile; it also has renal excretion kinetics that make it applicable in functional studies [63]. Its background signal in the brain, lungs, and muscles is low, allowing prediction of an advantageous signal-to-noise ratio for infections at these anatomical sites.

3.3. 11C-trimethoprim (11C-TMP)

11C-trimethoprim (11C-TMP) is a broad-spectrum antibiotic that belongs to an inhibitory class of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), which is an important enzyme in the de novo pathway of purine and thymidine synthesis, essential for the survival of the microorganism [64]. 11C-labeled trimethoprim (TMP) antibiotic-derived PET radiotracers accumulate specifically at sites of bacterial infection, as opposed to sites of sterile inflammation or neoplasms [65,66]. Several examples of first-in-human 11C-TMP imaging cases are reported in the literature [67]. Regarding the antibiotic resistance issue, it was seen to not affect imaging because drug-resistant bacterial species had a similar uptake of 11C-TMP compared to non-resistant species [68].

4. 68Ga-Labeled Radiopharmaceuticals

Gallium-68 (68Ga)-labeled radiopharmaceuticals can be suitable for inflammation and infection imaging, considering their availability from a generator and ease of labeling. In the past decade, the development of 68Ga-labeled PET tracers has carved out an important place in the diagnostic panorama of inflammation and infection imaging.
In particular, PET imaging with these tracers offers the opportunity to follow the molecular and cellular processes of inflammation in vivo, such as receptor expression, chemotaxis, and macrophage activation.
Some of these radiopharmaceuticals are represented by 68Ga-citrate, 68Ga-Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor (68Ga-FAPI), and 68Ga-labeled somatostatin analogues (68Ga-DOTATOC, 68Ga-DOTANOC, and 68Ga-DOTATATE).

4.1. 68Ga-Citrate

Being analogues of iron, the isotopes of Gallium accumulate at sites of infection and inflammation following several molecular mechanisms; 67Ga-citrate and 68Ga-citrate can be used for inflammation imaging with SPECT and PET, respectively.
Nevertheless, 67Ga-citrate scintigraphy and/or SPECT present some limits, such as long half-life decay (78 h), low image quality and resolution, and long duration of the diagnostic procedures (3 days) [69]. 68Ga is a useful beta-emitting isotope for PET imaging, produced by commercially available Germanium/Gallium generators, with a shorter half-life decay (67 min) [70].
After the intravenous injection, 68Ga-citrate circulates in the bloodstream bounded with transferrin and is carried to sites of inflammation and infection by zonal blood flow and increased vascular permeability. Being a ferric ion-like nuclide, 68Ga-citrate binds to lactoferrin, released by the apoptotic processes of leukocytes (Figure 3).
The blood pool, liver, spleen, kidneys and growth plates were the most common sites of 68Ga-citrate involvement [71]. Thus, 68Ga-citrate is useful for imaging tuberculosis [72]; other feasible applications could be represented by bacterial infections [69,73], periprosthetic joint infections [74], and rheumatoid arthritis [75]. Further studies are needed to ensure its role in these clinical settings.
On a theoretical basis, 68Ga-citrate could be an alternative to 18F-FDG in infection imaging due to the peculiar characteristics of the nuclide in this clinical setting, already known for SPECT imaging, with the added value of a higher resolution limit provided by PET and better anatomical evaluation supplied by the co-registered CT component of the exam. However, cited studies are limited to a few researchers worldwide, while a direct comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT concerning the diagnostic accuracy in large populations is still missing.

4.2. 68Ga-Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor (68Ga-FAPI)

The fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is a cell membrane protein overexpressed in cancer-associated fibroblasts, representing a component of the tumor stroma. Several clinical studies have highlighted the usefulness of gallium-labeled FAP inhibitor in imaging cancer cells due to the high-affinity complex with FAP (Figure 4), demonstrating 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT to be highly feasible [76,77], particularly because of the low physiological uptake in the human body, with high target-to-background ratio [78].
From the experience acquired with oncologic patients, the possibility has emerged to detect high 68Ga-FAPI uptake in sites not linked to the underlying disease [79]. Particularly, it has been shown that 68Ga-FAPI can be enhanced in inflammation and infections in cancer patients. A recent review of 108 papers evaluating FAPI labeled with either 18F and 68Ga showed that a large number of benign clinical entities may show FAPI uptake and should be considered when interpreting FAPI PET/CT in cancer patients, since FAPI uptake may be detected in arterial plaques, post-traumatic bone/articular lesions, arthritis, and in inflammation, infection, fibrosis, inflammatory/reactive lymph nodes and tuberculosis [80]. The authors hypothesized that these diagnostic pitfalls may occur from both specific uptake through rising FAP cellular expression and unspecific accumulation due to edema and inflammation processes. Moreover, it is also known that some cellular types such as activated fibroblasts show increased tracer accumulation, as in systemic sarcoidosis [81] or intra-cranial bacterial lesions [82]. However, the role of this tracer in infectious diseases is still unclear.

4.3. 68Ga-DOTATOC, 68Ga-DOTANOC, and 68Ga-DOTATATE

Some cellular types of inflammation such as activated macrophages and T cells express somatostatin receptors on the cell surface (Figure 5). Thus, radiolabeled somatostatin analogues may be enhanced at the sites of inflammation.
One of the main proposed applications of these tracers is linked to their capability to detect the phlogosis of atherosclerotic plaques, in both coronary and carotid arteries [83,84], with a higher signal-to-background ratio, in comparison with 18F-FDG due to the physiological myocardial uptake of glucose [41].
Another disease characterized by mild-to-high somatostatin analogue uptake is sarcoidosis, since somatostatin receptors are also expressed in sarcoid granulomas; some authors have proposed a feasible role for 68Ga-DOTATATE in the management of patients with active cardiac sarcoidosis despite a low signal-to-background ratio and underestimation of treatment response [85].
It has also emerged in case reports or preliminary focused studies in the literature that the uptake of radiolabeled somatostatin receptor analogues in inflammation is a condition that is not rare and may occur in patients with neuroendocrine tumors [86].
In particular, 68Ga-DOTANOC and 68Ga-DOTATOC uptake has been documented in acute myocarditis [87,88], and 68Ga-DOTATATE is enhanced in large vessel vasculitis, such as Takayasu arteritis [89].
However, due to the heterogeneous nature of these studies, it is difficult to pool the for statistical analysis. Data in the literature seem to support more versatile and better validated 68Ga-based inflammation probes, such as 68Ga-citrate and 68Ga-FAPI, mainly due to higher signal-to-background ratio and better diagnostic accuracy [90]. On this topic, it also has been shown that both 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTANOC uptake were similar in pulmonary tuberculosis; 68Ga-DOTANOC helped to detect pulmonary tuberculosis lesions, while 18F-FDG was more sensitive for both active and sub-clinical lesions [91].
In neuroendocrine tumor patients, incidental uptake of radiolabeled somatostatin receptor analogues linked to inflammation should be taken into account. In particular, cardiac uptake can indicate myocardial inflammation. Myocardial inflammation is a condition of clinical importance, and its underlying etiology should be further assessed to prompt eventual and necessary treatment, as it is linked to a poor prognosis [86].

5. Other 18F-Labeled Radiopharmaceuticals

Due to its physicochemical properties, 18F is a nuclide showing several advantages in PET imaging that are ideal for PET studies. The half-life of 18F (110 min), the most predominant radionuclide used in PET imaging, permits multi-step radiosynthetic protocols and tracer transport between clinical facilities. Moreover, the high positron (>97% β+) branching and low positron energy (0.635 MeV) of 18F provide high-resolution PET images [92].

5.1. 18F-FDG-Labeled White Blood Cells (18F-FDG-WBCs)

White blood cells (WBCs) can be labeled with 18F-FDG just as with gamma-emitting radiotracers (111In or 99mTc), with the added value of a co-registered, whole-body PET/CT scan, allowing a comprehensive evaluation of the entire body in a single session. The labeling methodology [93] involves the removal of red blood cells by sedimentation of heparinized peripheral blood and subsequent centrifugation of the WBC-enriched plasma to separate the WBC pellet. At this time, the labeling takes place by incubation with 18F-FDG (Figure 6).
After administration, the optimal imaging time is 120 min post-injection (Figure 7).
Clinical applications of 18F-FDG-WBC [94] include infected renal cysts, infected peri-pancreatic collections, cardiac implant infections, or after cardiac surgery. In a pilot study, a feasible role was hypothesized in the management of chronic prosthetic joint infections, without meaningful differences with 99mTc-HMPAO-WBC SPECT/CT in terms of diagnostic accuracy [21].
Another potential indication is the evaluation of bone involvement in diabetic cellulitis [95]. In prosthetic implant surgery, the use of 18F-FDG-WBC is not affected by the limits presented by triphasic bone scintigraphy, generally related to false positive findings from postoperative reactive changes [96]. Even though it is not a specific infection tracer, a negative 18F-FDG PET still has high negative predictive value; hence, in clinical practice, it is not necessary to further study leukocytes labeled with 18F-FDG [97].
Many diagnostic limitations are due to potential false negatives, such as chronic infections mediated by lymphocytes and macrophages or previous therapy (antibiotics, immune suppressants), reducing the immune response mediated by neutrophils; furthermore, there is low performance in the diagnosis of vertebral infections. From data available in literature reviews, the use of 18F-FDG-WBC PET/CT in infections demonstrates feasibility and good diagnostic performance but remains confined to the research domain, considering the difficulty in labeling and limited availability of data [94,98]; moreover, WBCs take 24 h to accumulate in infections, and the half-life of 18F is only 110 min [6].

5.2. 18F-FAPI

Numerous studies have demonstrated a superior diagnostic accuracy of FAPI PET/CT over FDG PET/CT in several malignant diseases. As already stated for 68Ga-FAPI, the cancer specificity of the 8F-labeled analogue remains understudied, with several cases of false-positive FAPI PET/CT reported in oncologic studies [80]. Due to its molecular affinity with 68Ga-FAPI, the possibility of 18F-FAPI uptake is also conceivable in further inflammatory conditions, other than arterial plaques and arteritis. Nevertheless, current data on this topic are limited to diagnostic pitfalls registered in cancer populations. 18F-FAPI needs to be tested for inflammation and infectious diseases.

5.3. 18F-fluoro-maltose (18F-FDM)

18F-fluoro-maltose (18F-FDM) can be obtained by the reaction of 18F-FDG with maltose phosphorylase; this tracer has showed in vivo accumulation directly into several clinically relevant bacteria. In particular, the high sensitivity of 18F-FDM methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus could justify its clinical use in infected patients [99].
Thus, as already stated for D-11C-Met and 11C-PABA and 11C-TMP, 18F-FDM has the potential to directly image bacterial infections, being metabolized in bacteria. However, the role of this tracer in inflammation imaging needs to be investigated through in vivo studies [100].

5.4. 18F-fluorodeoxysorbitol (18F-FDS)

18F-Fluorodeoxysorbitol (18F-FDS) has already been tested in preclinical studies as an imaging probe with the capability to be enhanced in bacteria [101] and fungal diseases [102]; in healthy human volunteers, this tracer has shown no adverse reactions and the ability to specifically detect Enterobacteriaceae infections, showing suitability for human use from a radiation dosimetry perspective [103]. Unfortunately, no progress has been made in translating these results to routine human use.

5.5. 18F-fluoropropyl-trimethoprim (18F-FPTMP)

18F-fluoropropyl-trimethoprim (18F-FPTMP) is the fluorinated analogue of the above-mentioned 11C-TMP. As bacteria-specific imaging probes, both of these tracers are under study for their affinity for key enzymes in the folate synthesis pathway, in preclinical models and in humans [62]. Despite the promising role of all antibiotic tracers, limited success has been registered for 18F-FPTMP during the last decade, mainly due to limitations of PET spatial resolution in the detection of bacterial infections [104].

6. Discussion

The PET tracer most used in clinical practice for infectious disease is 18F-FDG, showing uptake in both infected and sterile inflammation, being enhanced in activated monocytes and macrophages. Among its advantages, we must consider the extreme versatility of this glucose analogue in imaging inflammation, the capability to assess the response to therapy, the easy reproducibility of related PET scans, its wide availability, and the extensive literature. The limits of 18F-FDG are its poor specificity, especially in detecting aseptic inflammation, requiring further diagnostic procedures, with effects on dosimetry [22].
The efforts of radiochemists are dedicated to overcoming these limits by developing novel radiopharmaceuticals such as those cited above (Table 1).
As bacterial imaging probes, proposed 11C-labeled tracers can present a higher specificity intrinsically linked to the molecular pathways of D-11C-Met, 11C-PABA, and 11C-TMP. They could improve the detection of infectious foci, allowing the visualization of bacteria directly at sites of infection [104].
Beyond good theoretical specificity, the major limit of these bacterial tracers could be the difficulty to be enhanced in a large volume of bacteria, due to reports of engulfed bacteria inside macrophages, in vitro testing results [105], and also the suboptimal limits of PET power resolution, corresponding to 5–10 mm [106]; moreover, the concentration of this kind of tracer in the bacteria should be higher than that of the surrounding background to overcome these limits.
On the other hand, thanks to their peculiar molecular pathways, the possible role of these radiopharmaceuticals in ensuring the resistance of certain bacteria to antimicrobial drugs needs to be assessed. Antimicrobial resistance is still a diagnostic dilemma, in terms of best treatment options and patient prognosis.
In this specific clinical setting, the role of PET with bacterial tracers needs to be investigated in order to avoid unnecessary antibiotic treatments and to choose the best antimicrobial drug [107]. The uptake of these tracers in bacterial infections, detected by PET, could be a preliminary step prior to submitting patients to a specific antimicrobial drug [108].
All of the above considerations can be applied also to the fluorinated counterparts of antibiotic tracers, respectively: 18F-FPTMP, 18F-FDS and 18F-FDM. The longer half-life decay of 18F could enable the availability of these tracers also in those PET centers not provided by a cyclotron, also allowing both early and late imaging to improve research results [109]. Basically, there is still a lack of knowledge about the potentiality of this class of PET radiopharmaceuticals.
Conversely, data in the literature about some of the 68Ga-labeled tracers for inflammation and infection are more robust. In particular, 68Ga-Citrate has already shown the capability to detect bacterial infections [72,74] due to the possibility of being highly enhanced in infectious foci and surrounding tissues, since its binding to transferrin allows the distribution in the infected tissue, which is characterized by high vascular permeability and chemotaxis factors produced by human leukocytes [69,71].
68Ga-labeled somatostatin analogues and 68Ga-FAPI enable visualization of the inflammatory process and infectious foci, although the record of these findings is normally linked to incidental observations during whole-body PET/CT scans performed for oncologic purposes [79], particularly in neuroendocrine tumor patients [86].
All 68Ga-labeled tracers share similar metabolic conditions such as macrophage activation, receptor expression, and chemotaxis, allowing their feasible use in the management of infection. 18F-FAPI permits tracking other cell types such as fibroblasts, potentially improving specificity, but this feature has only been incidentally documented in oncologic studies. Surely, 68Ga-labeled tracers show high target-to-background ratios and share a low rate of physiological distribution in the brain, myocardium and liver, thus potentially playing a role in overcoming limitations of 18F-FDG in brain infections, myocarditis and liver abscess. 68Ga-DOTATOC and DOTANOC have already shown good diagnostic performance in diagnosing acute myocarditis [87,88], while 68Ga-FAPI may enable the identification of intracranial infections [82]. A further feasible application of 68Ga-labeled somatostatin analogues may also be represented by the imaging of active atherosclerotic plaques.
It is also necessary not to underestimate the larger experience of the nuclear medicine community with 68Ga-citrate, due to its counterpart labeled with 67Ga, which was the most important tracer for the study of infection and phlogosis by SPECT before the advent of the PET era. On this topic, we must consider the potential impact of 68Ga-citrate imaging of infectious diseases with the help of the better-performing PET scanner, provided with correlative CT for better delineation and stratification of infectious foci, in a single whole-body imaging session.
Concerning the other fluorinated PET tracers, we must clarify that few data support a high specificity of 18F-FDG-WBC in the diagnosis of infectious foci. Unfortunately, this is a time-consuming approach, also requiring the handling of blood, with limited data in the literature. 18F-FAPI can present features similar to those of 68Ga-FAPI with a better-quality image due to the 18F emission [110]. Unfortunately, the data available in the literature do not allow a comprehensive evaluation.
Despite the heterogeneity of the proposed tracers, we can suggest some considerations.
To date, 18F-FDG remains the most versatile and useful tracer for the diagnosis of infection. On the other hand, 68Ga-labeled tracers could overcome the limits of the specificity of 18F-FDG, also enabling visualization of infectious foci in the brain and myocardium. The 68Ga-labeled somatostatin analogues can represent a valid alternative for the diagnosis of myocarditis.
The antibiotic tracers, especially those labeled with 18F, can play a role in the management of bacterial infections with possible implications for the assessment of treatment efficacy, in particular in the field of antidrug resistance in bacteria; nevertheless, the limited experience and limitations due to the low power resolution of PET do not support their use in humans. Among nuclides, 18F is the more favorable in terms of quality image and availability [110,111]; 11C presents good-quality images but a rapid half-life decay, limiting its wide distribution, while 68Ga-labeled tracers present an advantage over 18F-FDG in that they can be created by a 68Ge/68Ga generator, thus not requiring a nearby cyclotron for their use [112]. As a future trend, Zirconium-89 (89Zr) is worthy of note as an emerging radioisotope produced by cyclotrons, with a long half-life (3.3 days) suitable for immuno-PET (with the synthesis of 89Zr-antibodies) [113]. Its potential application is represented by the production of radiolabeled antibodies directed against bacterial surface molecules. An example of these attractive radiopharmaceuticals is the radiolabeled human monoclonal antibody 89Zr-SAC55, directed against lipoteichoic acid (LTA), a molecule localized on the surface of Gram-positive bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, as demonstrated by Pickett et al. in a preclinical study; 89Zr-SAC55 may be useful in the identification of infection sites, helping in the discrimination between sterile inflammation and infection [114].
However, in the literature, there is still a lack of head-to-head comparison studies among 18F-FDG and other cited tracers. Few data are available for all radiopharmaceuticals evaluated in this clinical setting, in comparison to the robust literature developed in the last decade on 18F-FDG PET/CT in infectious diseases.
As a future trend, we must also consider that some of the above limits can be overcome by the advent of PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in clinical practice. PET/MRI, with higher soft-tissue contrast and better-performing PET scanners, will extend the field of molecular imaging to the study of infectious diseases [115], with high sensitivity [116]. This is a necessary step to perform prior to considering, as a further point of reflection, that further imaging probes are under study for the visualization of retroviral infections [117], while 18F-FDG already plays a role in the detection of tracer-avid lymphadenopathies linked to monkeypox infection in HIV patients [118].

7. Conclusions

18F-FDG is still the best tracer in the imaging of infections, but some novel molecular probes can overcome its limits.
68Ga-labeled PET radiopharmaceuticals can play a role in the diagnosis of infectious diseases due to their uptake mechanisms and the high target-to-background ratio expressed. Among these, 68Ga-citrate shows encouraging results in the detection of infections, while 68Ga-labeled somatostatin analogues can help in diagnosing myocarditis and other infectious foci in tissues with a high physiological gradient of 18F-FDG uptake. 18F could be the best nuclide for imaging; among fluorinated tracers, while antibiotic radiopharmaceuticals need to be further investigated. Similar findings are conceivable for 11C-labeled antibiotic tracers, despite the less favorable availability of 11C.
Head-to-head comparison studies are of the utmost importance to determine the best alternative to 18F-FDG.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and design of the paper, F.F.C.; literature analysis, M.L. and G.G.; literature interpretation, F.F.C., G.G., A.C. and M.L.; draft of the work, F.F.C., A.C., G.G. and M.L.; iconographic material, F.F.C. and M.L.; critical revision, F.F.C. and A.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors do not have any conflicts of interest in the manuscript, including financial, consultant, institutional and other relationships that might lead to bias or a conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rudd, K.E.; Johnson, S.C.; Agesa, K.M.; Shackelford, K.A.; Tsoi, D.; Kievlan, D.R.; Colombara, D.V.; Ikuta, K.S.; Kisoon, N.; Finfer, S.; et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 2020, 395, 200–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gotthardt, M.; Bleeker-Rovers, C.P.; Boerman, O.C.; Oyen, W.J.G. Imaging of inflammation by PET, conventional scintigraphy, and other imaging techniques. J. Nucl. Med. Technol. 2013, 41, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Filippi, L.; Uccioli, L.; Giurato, L.; Schillaci, O. Diabetic foot infection: Usefulness of SPECT/CT for 99mTc-HMPAO-labeled leukocyte imaging. J. Nucl. Med. 2009, 50, 1042–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yoo, J.; Cheon, M. Septic Pulmonary Emboli Detected by 18F-FDG PET/CT in a Patient with Central Venous Catheter-Related Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hess, S. [18F]FDG-PET/CT in patients with bacteremia: Clinical impact on patient management and outcome. Front. Med. 2023, 10, 1157692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lauri, C.; Signore, A.; Glaudemans, A.W.J.M.; Treglia, G.; Gheysens, O.; Slart, R.H.J.A.; Iezzi, R.; Prakken, N.H.J.; Debus, E.S.; Honig, S.; et al. Evidence-based guideline of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) on imaging infection in vascular grafts. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2022, 49, 3430–3451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Palestro, C.J. Molecular Imaging of Periprosthetic Joint Infections. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2023, 52, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ten Hove, D.; Wahadat, A.R.; Slart, R.H.J.A.; Wouthuyzen-Bakker, M.; Mecozzi, G.; Damman, K.; Witteveen, H.; Caliskan, K.; Manintveld, O.C.; Sinha, B.; et al. Added value of semi-quantitative analysis of [18F]FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of device-related infections in patients with a left ventricular assist device. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2023, 24, 819–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Betrains, A.; Boeckxstaens, L.; Moreel, L.; Wright, W.F.; Blockmans, D.; Van Laere, K.; Vanderschueren, S. Higher diagnostic yield of 18F-FDG PET in inflammation of unknown origin compared to fever of unknown origin. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2023, 110, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Régis, C.; Benali, K.; Rouzet, F. FDG PET/CT Imaging of Sarcoidosis. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2023, 53, 258–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ferro, P.; Boni, R.; Bartoli, F.; Lazzeri, F.; Slart, R.H.J.A.; Erba, P.A. Radionuclide Imaging of Infective Endocarditis. Cardiol. Clin. 2023, 41, 233–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Calabria, F.; Bagnato, A.; Guadagnino, G.; Toteda, M.; Lanzillotta, A.; Cardei, S.; Tavolaro, R.; Leporace, M. COVID-19 vaccine related hypermetabolic lymph nodes on PET/CT: Implications of inflammatory findings in cancer imaging. Oncol. Res. 2023, 31, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Griffin, M.T.; Werner, T.J.; Alavi, A.; Revheim, M.E. The value of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the assessment, monitoring, and management of COVID-19. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2023, 138, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kung, B.T.; Seraj, S.M.; Zadeh, M.Z.; Rojulpote, C.; Kothekar, E.; Ayubcha, C.; Ng, K.S.; Ng, K.K.; Au-Yong, T.K.; Werner, T.J.; et al. An update on the role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in major infectious and inflammatory diseases. Am. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2019, 9, 255–273. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jørgensen, N.P.; Alstrup, A.K.; Mortensen, F.V.; Knudsen, K.; Jakobsen, S.; Madsen, L.B.; Bender, D.; Breining, P.; Petersen, M.S.; Schleimann, M.H.; et al. Cholinergic PET imaging in infections and inflammation using 11C-donepezil and 18F-FEOBV. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2017, 44, 449–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Suilamo, S.; Li, X.G.; Lankinen, P.; Oikonen, V.; Tolvanen, T.; Luoto, P.; Viitanen, R.; Saraste, A.; Seppänen, M.; Pirilä, L.; et al. 68Ga-Citrate PET of Healthy Men: Whole-Body Biodistribution Kinetics and Radiation Dose Estimates. J. Nucl. Med. 2022, 63, 1598–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kwee, T.C.; Kwee, R.M.; Alavi, A. FDG-PET for diagnosing prosthetic joint infection: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2008, 35, 2122–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Rachh, S.S.; Basu, S.; Alavi, A. Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/Computed Tomography in Evaluation of Prosthetic Joints and Diabetic Foot: A Comparative Perspective with Other Functional Imaging Modalities. PET Clin. 2022, 17, 517–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Loharkar, S.; Basu, S. PET-Computed Tomography in Bone and Joint Infections. PET Clin. 2023, 18, 49–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Basu, S.; Kwee, T.C.; Saboury, B.; Garino, J.P.; Nelson, C.L.; Zhuang, H.; Parsons, M.; Chen, W.; Kumar, R.; Salavati, A.; et al. FDG PET for diagnosing infection in hip and knee prostheses: Prospective study in 221 prostheses and subgroup comparison with combined (111)In-labeled leukocyte/(99m)Tc-sulfur colloid bone marrow imaging in 88 prostheses. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2014, 39, 609–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Teiler, J.; Ahl, M.; Åkerlund, B.; Brismar, H.; Holstensson, M.; Gabrielson, S.; Hedlund, H.; Axelsson, R. 99mTc-HMPAO-WBC SPECT/CT versus 18F-FDG-WBC PET/CT in chronic prosthetic joint infection: A pilot study. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2022, 43, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Khalid, V.; Schønheyder, H.C.; Larsen, L.H.; Nielsen, P.T.; Kappel, A.; Thomsen, T.R.; Aleksyniene, R.; Lorenzen, J.; Ørsted, I.; Simonsen, O.; et al. Multidisciplinary Diagnostic Algorithm for Evaluation of Patients Presenting with a Prosthetic Problem in the Hip or Knee: A Prospective Study. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Divakaran, S. Radionuclide Assessment of Sarcoidosis. Cardiol. Clin. 2023, 42, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Aide, N.; Benayoun, M.; Kerrou, K.; Khalil, A.; Cadranel, J.; Talbot, J.N. Impact of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]-FDG) imaging in sarcoidosis: Unsuspected neurosarcoidosis discovered by [18F]-FDG PET and early metabolic response to corticosteroid therapy. Br. J. Radiol. 2007, 80, e67–e71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chen, H.; Jin, R.; Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Li, K.; He, Y. The Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Monitoring Response and Predicting Prognosis after Glucocorticoids Therapy for Sarcoidosis. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 1823710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Goletti, D.; Pisapia, R.; Fusco, F.M.; Aiello, A.; Van Crevel, R. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation and management of TB in patients with HIV and diabetes. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2023, 27, 284–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lawal, I.O.; Abubakar, S.; Ankrah, A.O.; Sathekge, M.M. Molecular Imaging of Tuberculosis. Semin. Nucl. 2023, 53, 37–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kim, D.W.; Park, S.A.; Kim, M.H. The utility of F-18 FDG PET/CT for diagnosis and response evaluation of hepatosplenic tuberculosis. Liver Int. 2023, 43, 733–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dhingra, V.K.; Khan, D.; Kumar, R.; Basu, S. Nonmalignant Thoracic Disorders: An Appraisal of Fluorodeoxyglucose and Non-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/Computed Tomography Applications. PET Clin. 2022, 17, 495–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cimini, A.; Ricci, M.; Gigliotti, P.E.; Pugliese, L.; Chiaravalloti, A.; Danieli, R.; Schillaci, O. Medical Imaging in the Diagnosis of Schistosomiasis: A Review. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Danve, A.; O’Dell, J. The Role of 18F Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Scanning in the Diagnosis and Management of Systemic Vasculitis. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2015, 18, 714–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Webb, M.; Chambers, A.; AL-Nahhas, A.; Mason, J.C.; Maudlin, L.; Rahman, L.; Frank, J. The role of 18F-FDG PET in characterising disease activity in Takayasu arteritis. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2004, 31, 627–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Narváez, J.; Estrada, P.; Vidal-Montal, P.; Sánchez-Rodríguez, I.; Sabaté-Llobera, A.; Nolla, J.M.; Cortés-Romera, M. Impact of previous glucocorticoid therapy on diagnostic accuracy of [18F] FDG PET-CT in giant cell arteritis. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2023, 60, 152183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ramachandran, A.; Antala, D.; Pudasainee, P.; Panginikkod, S. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan as a Diagnostic Tool for Giant Cell Arteritis. Cureus 2023, 15, e35835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chen, J.; Xu, D.; Sun, W.; Wang, W.X.; Xie, N.N.; Ruan, Q.R.; Song, J.X. Differential diagnosis of lymphoma with 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with fever of unknown origin accompanied by lymphadenopathy. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2023, 149, 7187–7196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Palestro, C.J.; Brandon, D.; Dibble, E.H.; Keidar, Z.; Kwak, J. FDG PET in Evaluation of Patients With Fever of Unknown Origin: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2023, 221, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Letertre, S.; Fesler, P.; Zerkowski, L.; Picot, M.C.; Ribstein, J.; Guilpain, P.; Le Moing, V.; Mariano-Goulart, D.; Roubille, C. Place of the 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the Diagnostic Workup in Patients with Classical Fever of Unknown Origin (FUO). J. Nucl. Med. 2021, 10, 3831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tsai, H.Y.; Lee, M.H.; Wan, C.H.; Yang, L.Y.; Yen, T.C.; Tseng, J.R. C-reactive protein levels can predict positive 18F-FDG PET/CT findings that lead to management changes in patients with bacteremia. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2018, 51, 839–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Khalatbari, H.; Shulkin, B.L.; Parisi, M.T. Emerging Trends in Radionuclide Imaging of Infection and Inflammation in Pediatrics: Focus on FDG PET/CT and Immune Reactivity. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2023, 53, 18–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jain, L.; Mackenzie, S.; Bomanji, J.B.; Shortman, R.; Noursadeghi, M.; Edwards, S.G.; Miller, R.F. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging in HIV-infected patients with lymphadenopathy, with or without fever and/or splenomegaly. Int. J. STD AIDS 2018, 29, 691–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mikail, N.; Hyafil, F. Nuclear Imaging in Infective Endocarditis. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 15, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, T.K.M.; Sánchez-Nadales, A.; Igbinomwanhia, E.; Cremer, P.; Griffin, B.; Xu, B. Diagnosis of Infective Endocarditis by Subtype Using (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Contemporary Meta-Analysis. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2020, 13, e010600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Gomes, A.; Glaudemans, A.; Touw, D.J.; van Melle, J.P.; Willems, T.P.; Maass, A.H.; Natour, E.; Prakken, N.H.J.; Borra, R.J.H.; van Geel, P.P.; et al. Diagnostic value of imaging in infective endocarditis: A systematic review. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, e1–e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Rubini, G.; Ferrari, C.; Carretta, D.; Santacroce, L.; Ruta, R.; Iuele, F.; Lavelli, V.; Merenda, N.; D’Agostino, C.; Sardaro, A.; et al. Usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Suspected of Late Infection. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Koort, J.K.; Mäkinen, T.J.; Knuuti, J.; Jalava, J.; Aro, H.T. Comparative 18F-FDG PET of experimental Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis and normal bone healing. J. Nucl. Med. 2004, 45, 1406–1411. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Basu, S.; Chryssikos, T.; Moghadam-Kia, S.; Zhuang, H.; Torigian, D.A.; Alavi, A. (Eds.) Positron emission tomography as a diagnostic tool in infection: Present role and future possibilities. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2009, 39, 36–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Gnanasegaran, G.; Vijayanathan, S.; Fogelman, I. Diagnosis of infection in the diabetic foot using (18)F-FDG PET/CT: A sweet alternative? Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2012, 39, 1525–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fujimoto, K.; Norikane, T.; Mitamura, K.; Yamamoto, Y.; Okano, K.; Suzuki, Y.; Nishiyama, Y. Liver Abscess With High 18F-FDG Uptake and No 18F-Fluorothymidine Uptake. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2021, 46, e208–e209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Nabizadeh, F.; Ramezannezhad, E.; Sardaripour, A.; Seyedi, S.A.; Salehi, N.; Rezaeimanesh, N.; Naser Moghadasi, A. [18F]FDG brain PET and clinical symptoms in different autoantibodies of autoimmune encephalitis: A systematic review. Neurol. Sci. 2022, 43, 4701–4718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pijl, J.P.; Nienhuis, P.H.; Kwee, T.C.; Glaudemans, A.W.J.M.; Slart, R.H.J.A.; Gormsen, L.C. Limitations and Pitfalls of FDG-PET/CT in Infection and Inflammation. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2021, 51, 633–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Meyer, M.; Gast, T.; Raja, S.; Hubner, K. Increased F-18 FDG accumulation in an acute fracture. Clin. Nucl. Med. 1994, 19, 13–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zhuang, H.; Sam, J.W.; Chacko, T.K.; Duarte, P.S.; Hickeson, M.; Feng, Q.; Nakhoda, K.Z.; Guan, L.; Reich, P.; Altimari, S.M.; et al. Rapid normalization of osseous FDG uptake following traumatic or surgical fractures. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2003, 30, 1096–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Goud, N.S.; Bhattacharya, A.; Joshi, R.K.; Nagaraj, C.; Bharath, R.D.; Kumar, P. Carbon-11: Radiochemistry and Target-Based PET Molecular Imaging Applications in Oncology, Cardiology, and Neurology. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 1223–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Neumann, K.D.; Villanueva-Meyer, J.E.; Mutch, C.A.; Flavell, R.R.; Blecha, J.E.; Kwak, T.; Sriram, R.; VanBrocklin, H.F.; Rosenberg, O.S.; Ohliger, M.A.; et al. Imaging active infection in vivo using D-amino acid derived PET radiotracers. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 7903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Mota, F.; Jain, S.K. Flagging bacteria with radiolabeled D-amino acids. ACS Cent. Sci. 2020, 6, 97–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Bugg, T.D.; Walsh, C.T. Intracellular steps of bacterial cell wall peptidoglycan biosynthesis: Enzymology, antibiotics, and antibiotic resistance. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1992, 9, 199–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kuru, E.; Tekkam, S.; Hall, E.; Brun, Y.V.; Van Nieuwenhze, M.S. Synthesis of fluorescent D-amino acids and their use for probing peptidoglycan synthesis and bacterial growth in situ. Nat. Protoc. 2015, 10, 33–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Polvoy, I.; Seo, Y.; Parker, M.; Stewart, M.; Siddiqua, K.; Manacsa, H.S.; Ravanfar, V.; Blecha, J.; Hope, T.A.; Vanbrocklin, H.; et al. Imaging joint infections using D-methyl-11C-methionine PET/MRI: Initial experience in humans. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2022, 49, 3761–3771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Ordonez, A.A.; Weinstein, E.A.; Bambarger, L.E.; Saini, V.; Chang, Y.S.; DeMarco, V.P.; Klunk, M.H.; Urbanowski, M.E.; Moulton, K.L.; Murawski, A.M.; et al. A Systematic Approach for Developing Bacteria-Specific Imaging Tracers. J. Nucl. Med. 2017, 58, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mutch, C.A.; Ordonez, A.A.; Qin, H.; Parker, M.; Bambarger, L.E.; Villanueva-Meyer, J.E.; Blecha, J.; Carroll, V.; Taglang, C.; Flavell, R.; et al. [11C]Para-Aminobenzoic Acid: A Positron Emission Tomography Tracer Targeting Bacteria-Specific Metabolism. ACS Infect. Dis. 2018, 4, 1067–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, Z.; Ordonez, A.A.; Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Gogarty, K.R.; Weinstein, E.A.; Daryaee, F.; Merino, J.; Yoon, G.E.; Kalinda, A.S.; et al. Positron Emission Tomography Imaging with 2-[18F]F-p-Aminobenzoic Acid Detects Staphylococcus aureus Infections and Monitors Drug Response. ACS Infect. Dis. 2018, 4, 1635–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Ordonez, A.A.; Parker, M.F.; Miller, R.J.; Plyku, D.; Ruiz-Bedoya, C.A.; Tucker, E.W.; Luu, J.M.; Dikeman, D.A.; Lesniak, W.G.; Holt, D.P.; et al. 11C-Para-aminobenzoic acid PET imaging of S. aureus and MRSA infection in preclinical models and humans. JCI Insight 2022, 7, e154117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ruiz-Bedoya, C.A.; Ordonez, A.A.; Werner, R.A.; Plyku, D.; Klunk, M.H.; Leal, J.; Lesniak, W.G.; Holt, D.P.; Dannals, R.F.; Higuchi, T. 11C-PABA as a PET Radiotracer for Functional Renal Imaging: Preclinical and First-in-Human Study11. J. Nucl. Med. 2020, 61, 1665–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Srinivasan, B.; Tonddast-Navaei, S.; Roy, A.; Zhou, H.; Skolnick, J. Chemical space of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors: New approaches for discovering novel drugs for old bugs. Med. Res. Rev. 2019, 39, 684–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Sellmyer, M.A.; Lee, I.; Hou, C.; Weng, C.C.; Li, S.; Lieberman, B.P.; Zeng, C.; Mankoff, D.A.; Mach, R.H. Bacterial infection imaging with [18F]fluoropropyl-trimethoprim. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 8372–8377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Sellmyer, M.A.; Lee, I.; Hou, C.; Lieberman, B.P.; Zeng, C.; Mankoff, D.A.; Mach, R.H. Quantitative PET Reporter Gene Imaging with [11C]Trimethoprim. Mol. Ther. 2017, 25, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Gouws, A.C.; Kruger, H.G.; Gheysens, O.; Zeevaart, J.R.; Govender, T.; Naicker, T.; Ebenhan, T. Antibiotic-Derived Radiotracers for Positron Emission Tomography: Nuclear or “Unclear” Infection Imaging? Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2022, 61, e202204955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lee, I.K.; Jacome, D.A.; Cho, J.K.; Tu, V.; Young, A.J.; Dominguez, T.; Northrup, J.D.; Etersque, J.M.; Lee, H.S.; Ruff, A.; et al. Imaging Sensitive and Drug-Resistant Bacterial Infection with [11C]-TMP: In Vitro and First-in-Human Evaluation. J. Clin. Investig. 2022, 132, e156679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Nanni, C.; Errani, C.; Boriani, L.; Fantini, L.; Ambrosini, V.; Boschi, S.; Rubello, D.; Pettinato, C.; Mercuri, M.; Gasbarrini, A.; et al. 68Ga-citrate PET/CT for evaluating patients with infections of the bone: Preliminary results. J. Nucl. Med. 2010, 51, 1932–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zimmerman, B.E.; Cessna, J.T.; Fitzgerald, R. Standardization of (68)Ge/(68)Ga Using Three Liquid Scintillation Counting Based Methods. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 2008, 113, 265–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Uğur, A.; Gültekin, A. Physiological Animal Imaging with 68Ga-Citrate. Curr. Radiopharm. 2021, 14, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Vorster, M.; Maes, A.; Jacobs, A.; Malefahlo, S.; Pottel, H.; Van de Wiele, C.; Sathekge, M.M. Evaluating the possible role of 68Ga-citrate PET/CT in the characterization of indeterminate lung lesions. Ann. Nucl. Med. 2014, 28, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kumar, V.; Boddeti, D.K.; Evans, S.G.; Angelides, S. (68)Ga-Citrate-PET for diagnostic imaging of infection in rats and for intra-abdominal infection in a patient. Curr. Radiopharm. 2012, 5, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Xu, T.; Zeng, Y.; Yang, X.; Liu, G.; Lv, T.; Yang, H.; Jiang, F.; Chen, Y. Application of 68Ga-citrate PET/CT for differentiating periprosthetic joint infection from aseptic loosening after joint replacement surgery. Bone Jt. Res. 2022, 11, 398–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Wang, Z.; Hou, Y.; Cai, L.; Chen, Y. The Evaluation of 68Ga-Citrate PET/CT Imaging for Dihydroartemisinin in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2021, 23, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Sayiner, Z.A.; Elboğa, U.; Sahin, E.; Ozturk, S.; Cayirli, Y.B.; Celen, Y.Z.; Akarsu, E.; Dogan, I.; Kilbas, B.; Eryilmaz, K.; et al. Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI-04 and 18F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosis of metastatic lesions in patients with recurrent papillary thyroid carcinoma. Hell. J. Nucl. Med. 2023, 26, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  77. Kessler, L. Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor (FAPI)-PET Imaging in Sarcoma. PET Clin. 2023, 18, 353–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wass, G.; Clifford, K.; Subramaniam, R.M. Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of FAPI PET/CT in oncologic Studies: Systematic Review and Metaanalysis. J. Nucl. Med. 2023, 64, 1218–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Meetschen, M.; Sandach, P.; Darwiche, K.; Theegarten, D.; Moter, A.; Schaarschmidt, B.M.; Herrmann, K.; Fendler, W.P.; Hautzel, H.; Opitz, M. Rabbit fever: Granulomatous inflammation by Francisella tularensis mimics lung cancer in dual tracer 18FDG and 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2023, 50, 2567–2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bentestuen, M.; Al-Obaydi, N.; Zacho, H.D. FAPI-avid nonmalignant PET/CT findings: An expedited systematic review. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2023, 53, 694–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, J.; Huo, L.; Lin, L.; Niu, N.; Li, X. In Vivo Fibroblast Activation of Systemic Sarcoidosis: A 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT Imaging Study. Diagnostics 2023, 17, 1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Zhang, Z.; Hou, W.; Pan, G.; Zuo, C.; Cheng, C. Elevated 68 Ga-FAPI-04 Activity Due to Staphylococcus aureus Intracranial Infection. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2024, 1, 49. [Google Scholar]
  83. Malmberg, C.; Ripa, R.S.; Johnbeck, C.B.; Knigge, U.; Langer, S.W.; Mortensen, J.; Oturai, P.; Loft, A.; Hag, A.M.; Kjær, A. 64Cu-DOTATATE for Noninvasive Assessment of Atherosclerosis in Large Arteries and Its Correlation with Risk Factors: Head-to-Head Comparison with 68Ga-DOTATOC in 60 Patients. J. Nucl. Med. 2015, 56, 1895–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Anzola, L.K.; Rivera, J.N.; Ramirez, J.C.; Signore, A.; Mut, F. Molecular Imaging of Vulnerable Coronary Plaque with Radiolabeled Somatostatin Receptors (SSTR). J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 5515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Lee, H.; Schubert, E.K.; Vidula, M.K.; Pryma, D.A.; Marchlinski, F.E.; Goldberg, L.R.; Clancy, C.B.; Rossman, M.D.; DiCarli, M.F.; Bravo, P.E. Potential clinical utility of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT for detection and response assessment in cardiac sarcoidosis. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2023, 30, 1075–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Bobbio, E.; Dudás, A.; Bergström, A.; Esposito, D.; Angerås, O.; Taha, A.; van Essen, M.; Björkenstam, M.; Karason, K.; Bollano, E.; et al. Incidental cardiac findings on somatostatin receptor PET/CT: What do they indicate and are they of clinical relevance? J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2022, 29, 1159–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Jaleel, J.; Patel, C.D.; Chandra, K.B.; Ramakrishnan, S.; Seth, S. Imaging Acute Myocarditis with 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT. Indian J. Nucl. Med. 2023, 38, 69–70. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  88. Boughdad, S.; Latifyan, S.; Fenwick, C.; Bouchaab, H.; Suffiotti, M.; Moslehi, J.J.; Salem, J.E.; Schaefer, N.; Nicod-Lalonde, M.; Costes, J.; et al. 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT to detect immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis. J. Immunother. Cancer 2021, 9, e003594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ćorović, A.; Wall, C.; Nus, M.; Gopalan, D.; Huang, Y.; Imaz, M.; Zulcinski, M.; Peverelli, M.; Uryga, A.; Lambert, J.; et al. Somatostatin Receptor PET/MR Imaging of Inflammation in Patients With Large Vessel Vasculitis and Atherosclerosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2023, 81, 336–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Vorster, M. Gallium-68 Labelled Radiopharmaceuticals for Imaging Inflammatory Disorders. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2023, 53, 199–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Naftalin, C.M.; Leek, F.; Hallinan, J.T.P.D.; Khor, L.K.; Totman, J.J.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.T.; Paton, N.I. Comparison of 68Ga-DOTANOC with 18F-FDG using PET/MRI imaging in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Craig, A.; Kogler, J.; Laube, M.; Ullrich, M.; Donat, C.K.; Wodtke, R.; Kopka, K.; Stadlbauer, S. Preparation of 18F-Labeled Tracers Targeting Fibroblast Activation Protein via Sulfur [18F]Fluoride Exchange Reaction. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 2749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Bhattacharya, A.; Kochhar, R.; Sharma, S.; Ray, P.; Kalra, N.; Khandelwal, N.; Mittal, B.R. PET/CT with 18F-FDG-labeled autologous leukocytes for the diagnosis of infected fluid collections in acute pancreatitis. J. Nucl. Med. 2014, 55, 1267–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Meyer, M.; Testart, N.; Jreige, M.; Kamani, C.; Moshebah, M.; Muoio, B.; Nicod-Lalonde, M.; Schaefer, N.; Giovanella, L.; Prior, J.O.; et al. Diagnostic Performance of PET or PET/CT Using 18F-FDG Labeled White Blood Cells in Infectious Diseases: A Systematic Review and a Bivariate Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics 2019, 9, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Rastogi, A.; Bhattacharya, A.; Prakash, M.; Sharma, S.; Mittal, B.R.; Khandelwal, N.; Bhansali, A. Utility of PET/CT with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose-labeled autologous leukocytes for diagnosing diabetic foot osteomyelitis in patients with Charcot’s neuroarthropathy. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2016, 37, 1253–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Aksoy, S.Y.; Asa, S.; Ozhan, M.; Ocak, M.; Sager, M.S.; Erkan, M.E.; Halac, M.; Kabasakal, L.; Sönmezoglu, K.; Kanmaz, B. FDG and FDG-labelled leucocyte PET/CT in the imaging of prosthetic joint infection. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2014, 41, 556–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Yilmaz, S.; Vatankulu, B.; Ekmekciogu, O.; Sager, S.; Halac, M. FDG and FDG-labelled leucocyte PET/CT in the imaging of prosthetic joint infection: Response to Lazzeri et al. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2014, 41, 1813–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Krishnaraju, V.S.; Singh, H.; Kumar, R.; Sharma, S.; Mittal, B.R.; Bhattacharya, A. Infection imaging using [18F]FDG-labelled white blood cell positron emission tomography-computed tomography. Br. J. Radiol. 2021, 94, 20201204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Sorlin, A.M.; López-Álvarez, M.; Rabbitt, S.J.; Alanizi, A.A.; Shuere, R.; Bobba, K.N.; Blecha, J.; Sakhamuri, S.; Evans, M.J.; Bayles, K.W.; et al. Chemoenzymatic Syntheses of Fluorine-18-Labeled Disaccharides from [18F] FDG Yield Potent Sensors of Living Bacteria In Vivo. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 17632–17642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Furumoto, S.; Shinbo, R.; Iwata, R.; Ishikawa, Y.; Yanai, K.; Yoshioka, T.; Fukuda, H. In vitro and in vivo characterization of 2-deoxy-2-18F-fluoro-D-mannose as a tumor-imaging agent for PET. J. Nucl. Med. 2013, 54, 1354–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Li, J.; Zheng, H.; Fodah, R.; Warawa, J.M.; Ng, C.K. Validation of 2-18F-Fluorodeoxysorbitol as a Potential Radiopharmaceutical for Imaging Bacterial Infection in the Lung. J. Nucl. Med. 2018, 59, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Rua, M.; Simón, J.A.; Collantes, M.; Ecay, M.; Leiva, J.; Carmona-Torre, F.; Ramos, R.; Pareja, F.; Pulagam, K.R.; Llop, J.; et al. Infection-specific PET imaging with 18F-fluorodeoxysorbitol and 2-[18F]F-ρ-aminobenzoic acid: An extended diagnostic tool for bacterial and fungal diseases. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1094929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Zhu, W.; Yao, S.; Xing, H.; Zhang, H.; Tai, Y.C.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Wu, C.; Wang, H.; et al. Biodistribution and Radiation Dosimetry of the Enterobacteriaceae-Specific Imaging Probe [(18)F]Fluorodeoxysorbitol Determined by PET/CT in Healthy Human Volunteers. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2016, 18, 782–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Singh, S.B.; Bhandari, S.; Siwakoti, S.; Bhatta, R.; Raynor, W.Y.; Werner, T.J.; Alavi, A.; Hess, S.; Revheim, M. Is Imaging Bacteria with PET a Realistic Option or an Illusion? Diagnostics 2023, 13, 1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Hess, S.; Alavi, A.; Werner, T.; Høilund-Carlsen, P.F. Molecular Imaging of Bacteria in Patients Is an Attractive Fata Morgana, Not a Realistic Option. J. Nucl. Med. 2018, 59, 716–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Zaindi, H.; Alavi, A. Current Trends in PET and Combined (PET/CT and PET/MR) Systems Design. PET Clin. 2007, 2, 109–123. [Google Scholar]
  107. Morrison, L.; Zembower, T.R. Antimicrobial Resistance. Gastrointest. Endosc. Clin. N. Am. 2020, 30, 619–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Giraudo, C.; Evangelista, L.; Fraia, A.S.; Lupi, A.; Quaia, E.; Cecchin, D.; Casali, M. Molecular Imaging of Pulmonary Inflammation and Infection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Bioletto, F.; Barale, M.; Parasiliti-Caprino, M.; Prencipe, N.; Berton, A.M.; Procopio, M.; Deandreis, D.; Ghigo, E. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-Fluorocholine PET and 11C-Methionine PET for parathyroid localization in primary hyperparathyroidism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2021, 185, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Braune, A.; Oehme, L.; Freudenberg, R.; Hofheinz, F.; van den Hoff, J.; Kotzerke, J.; Hoberück, S. Comparison of image quality and spatial resolution between 18F, 68Ga, and 64Cu phantom measurements using a digital Biograph Vision PET/CT. EJNMMI Phys. 2022, 9, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Calabria, F.; Gallo, G.; Schillaci, O.; Cascini, G.L. Bio-Distribution, Imaging Protocols and Diagnostic Accuracy of PET with Tracers of Lipogenesis in Imaging Prostate Cancer: A Comparison between 11C-Choline, 18FFluoroethylcholine and 18F-Methylcholine. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2015, 21, 4738–4747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Sanchez, S.; Currie, G.M. Topical Sensor for the Assessment of Injection Quality for 18F-FDG, 68Ga-PSMA and 68Ga-DOTATATE Positron Emission Tomography. J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Sci. 2020, 51, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Yoon, J.K.; Park, B.N.; Ryu, E.K.; An, Y.S.; Lee, S.J. Current Perspectives on 89Zr-PET Imaging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Pickett, J.E.; Thompson, J.M.; Sadowska, A.; Tkaczyk, C.; Sellman, B.R.; Minola, A.; Corti, D.; Lanzavecchia, A.; Miller, L.S.; Thorek, D.L. Molecularly specific detection of bacterial lipoteichoic acid for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection of the bone. Bone Res. 2018, 6, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Kirienko, M.; Erba, P.A.; Chiti, A.; Sollini, M. Hybrid PET/MRI in Infection and Inflammation: An Update About the Latest Available Literature Evidence. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2023, 53, 107–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Rohan, T.; Hložanka, P.; Dostál, M.; Macek, T.; Fojtík, Z.; Šprláková-Puková, A.; Keřkovský, M. Significance of F-18 FDG PET/MRI in the search for the etiology of inflammation of unclear origin and fever of unknown origin. Eur. J. Radiol. 2024, 171, 111281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Tisseraud, M.; Goutal, S.; Bonasera, T.; Goislard, M.; Desjardins, D.; Le Grand, R.; Parry, C.M.; Tournier, N.; Kuhnast, B.; Caillé, F. Isotopic Radiolabeling of the Antiretroviral Drug [18F]Dolutegravir for Pharmacokinetic PET Imaging. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Manzarbeitia-Arroba, B.; Ruiz-Solis, S.; Vega-Perez, D.; Garcia-Alonso, P.; Tabuenca, M.J. F-FDG PET/CT Findings in Monkeypox Infection in an HIV Patient. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2023, 48, e574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Internalization and phosphorylation of 18F-FDG from the bloodstream in cells.
Figure 1. Internalization and phosphorylation of 18F-FDG from the bloodstream in cells.
Diagnostics 14 01043 g001
Figure 2. 11C radiolabeled PET radiopharmaceuticals and their respective cellular targets in Gram-positive bacteria. DHFR: dihydrofolate reductase; DHF: dihydrofolate; THF: tetrahydrofolate; 11C-PABA: 11C-para-Aminobenzoic acid; D-11C-Met: D-methyl-11C-methionine; 11C-TMP: 11C-trimethoprim.
Figure 2. 11C radiolabeled PET radiopharmaceuticals and their respective cellular targets in Gram-positive bacteria. DHFR: dihydrofolate reductase; DHF: dihydrofolate; THF: tetrahydrofolate; 11C-PABA: 11C-para-Aminobenzoic acid; D-11C-Met: D-methyl-11C-methionine; 11C-TMP: 11C-trimethoprim.
Diagnostics 14 01043 g002
Figure 3. After intravenous administration, transferrin-bounded 68Ga-citrate circulates in the bloodstream and is transported by the arteries to the site of inflammation by mechanisms of blood flow and increased vascular permeability. The ferric ion-like properties of 68Ga-citrate allow its binding to lactoferrin, released by the apoptotic processes of leukocytes.
Figure 3. After intravenous administration, transferrin-bounded 68Ga-citrate circulates in the bloodstream and is transported by the arteries to the site of inflammation by mechanisms of blood flow and increased vascular permeability. The ferric ion-like properties of 68Ga-citrate allow its binding to lactoferrin, released by the apoptotic processes of leukocytes.
Diagnostics 14 01043 g003
Figure 4. 68Ga-FAPI reaches the infectious site by the bloodstream and interacts with FAP in fibroblasts of the infectious microenvironment.
Figure 4. 68Ga-FAPI reaches the infectious site by the bloodstream and interacts with FAP in fibroblasts of the infectious microenvironment.
Diagnostics 14 01043 g004
Figure 5. The uptake of radiolabeled somatostatin analogues in infection is due to the overexpression of cell surface somatostatin receptors in activated macrophages.
Figure 5. The uptake of radiolabeled somatostatin analogues in infection is due to the overexpression of cell surface somatostatin receptors in activated macrophages.
Diagnostics 14 01043 g005
Figure 6. Simplified preparation of 18F-FDG-radiolabeled white blood cells. Venous blood is collected in a heparinized syringe; after plasma separation and centrifugation, 18F-FDG is added to the white blood cell pellet suspension. After incubation, the radiolabeled white blood cell sediment is reconstituted with the patient’s cell-free plasma and intravenously reinjected (18F-FDG: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose;—WBC: white blood cell).
Figure 6. Simplified preparation of 18F-FDG-radiolabeled white blood cells. Venous blood is collected in a heparinized syringe; after plasma separation and centrifugation, 18F-FDG is added to the white blood cell pellet suspension. After incubation, the radiolabeled white blood cell sediment is reconstituted with the patient’s cell-free plasma and intravenously reinjected (18F-FDG: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose;—WBC: white blood cell).
Diagnostics 14 01043 g006
Figure 7. Mechanism of uptake of 18F-FDG-labeled white blood cells in infectious foci.
Figure 7. Mechanism of uptake of 18F-FDG-labeled white blood cells in infectious foci.
Diagnostics 14 01043 g007
Table 1. Summary of the different radiopharmaceuticals used for infectious disease imaging, with their respective molecular pathways, clinical settings, advantages and drawbacks.
Table 1. Summary of the different radiopharmaceuticals used for infectious disease imaging, with their respective molecular pathways, clinical settings, advantages and drawbacks.
NuclideRadiopharmaceuticalsMolecular PathwayEvaluated DiseaseAdvantagesDrawbacks
D-11C-MetIncorporation into bacterial cell membraneInfected joint prostheses [58]Uptake in bacteria, high signal-to-background ratioLimits of PET spatial resolution for the detection of bacteria
11C11C-PABABacterial folate synthesisMethicillin-resistant S. aureus infection [62]Uptake in bacteria, high signal-to-background ratioLimits of PET spatial resolution for the detection of bacteria
11C-TMPBacterial purine and thymidine synthesisBacterial infection [67,68]Uptake in bacteriaLimits of PET spatial resolution for the detection of bacteria
68Ga-CitrateLeukocytes apoptosisTuberculosis [72], bacterial infections [69,73], periprosthetic joint infections [74], and rheumatoid arthritis [75]High affinity for infection sites and signal-to-background ratioMissing direct comparison with 18F-FDG
68Ga68Ga-FAPIFAP expression in fibroblastSarcoidosis [81], intracranial bacterial lesions [82]Selectivity for fibroblasts, high signal-to-background ratioFew available data
68Ga-DOTATOC/DOTANOC/DOTATATESomatostatin receptor expression in macrophages and T-cells Atherosclerotic plaques [83,84], cardiac sarcoidosis [85], myocarditis [87,88], vasculitis [89]Somatostatin receptors exression in granulomasMostly incidental detection in PET/CT scans developed for oncologic purpose
18F-FDG-WBCImaging of white blood cellsInfected renal cysts, infected peri-pancreatic collections, cardiac implant infections [94]Direct visualization of leukocytes in infected fociFalse positive findings, difficulty in labeling
18F-FAPIFAP expression in fibroblastArterial plaques and arteritis [80]Selectivity for fibroblastsIncidental detection in PET/CT developed for oncologic purpose
18F18F-FDMAccumulation into bacteriaMethicillin-resistant S.aureus infection [99]High sensitivityFew available data
18F-FDSAccumulation into bacteria and fungiBacterial diseases and mycoses [102]Detection of EnterobacteriaceaeOnly preclinical studies
18F-FPTMPBacterial folate synthesisS.aureus infection [62]High affinity for bacteriaLimits of PET spatial resolution for the detection of bacteria
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Calabria, F.F.; Guadagnino, G.; Cimini, A.; Leporace, M. PET/CT Imaging of Infectious Diseases: Overview of Novel Radiopharmaceuticals. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1043. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14101043

AMA Style

Calabria FF, Guadagnino G, Cimini A, Leporace M. PET/CT Imaging of Infectious Diseases: Overview of Novel Radiopharmaceuticals. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(10):1043. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14101043

Chicago/Turabian Style

Calabria, Ferdinando F., Giuliana Guadagnino, Andrea Cimini, and Mario Leporace. 2024. "PET/CT Imaging of Infectious Diseases: Overview of Novel Radiopharmaceuticals" Diagnostics 14, no. 10: 1043. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14101043

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop