Next Article in Journal
X-ray Structures and Hirshfeld Studies of Two Dinuclear Cd(II) Complexes with a s-Triazine/Pyrazolo Ligand and Pesudohalides as a Linker
Next Article in Special Issue
A Short and Practical Overview on Light-Sensing Proteins, Optogenetics, and Fluorescent Biomolecules inside Biomorphs Used as Optical Sensors
Previous Article in Journal
Phononic Crystal Coupled Mie Structure for Acoustic Amplification
Previous Article in Special Issue
Structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis 1-Deoxy-D-Xylulose 5-Phosphate Synthase in Complex with Butylacetylphosphonate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Crystal Packing Differences as a Key Factor for Stabilization of the N-Terminal Fragment of the Human HINT1 Protein

Centre of Molecular and Macromolecular Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences, Sienkiewicza 112, 90-363 Lodz, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2023, 13(8), 1197; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13081197
Submission received: 26 June 2023 / Revised: 26 July 2023 / Accepted: 27 July 2023 / Published: 2 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Biomolecular Crystals in 2022-2023)

Abstract

:
Histidine triad nucleotide-binding protein 1 (HINT1) is the oldest and most widely distributed branch of the histidine triad superfamily of proteins. The HINT1 protein plays an important role in various biological processes and has been found in many species. Here we report the first nearly complete structure of the human HINT1 protein at 1.43 Å resolution obtained from a crystal of the P212121 orthorhombic space group. The final structure has an Rcryst = 22.4% (Rfree = 27.7%) and contains a fragment of the N-terminal part that was not determined in the previously deposited structures. In addition, selective binding of the L-malate ion was detected, which had not been observed previously.

1. Introduction

Histidine triad nucleotide-binding protein 1 (HINT1) belongs to a branch of the histidine triad protein superfamily (HIT), which consists mainly of mono- and dinucleotide hydrolases and nucleotide transferases. They have a characteristic active site motif HXHXHXX, where X is a hydrophobic residue [1]. HINT1 and other HINT proteins are the most highly conserved members of the HIT superfamily, and their homologs are found in many organismal kingdoms, including metazoans [2,3,4], plants [5], fungi [6], and bacteria [7,8]. HINT1 is expressed in numerous tissues and is present in cell nuclei and cytoplasm, but its function is only partially elucidated. It is involved in transcriptional regulation [9,10,11,12,13,14,15] and cell cycle control [16]. In mammals, HINT1 modulates apoptosis in cancer cells and is a potential tumor suppressor [12,14,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Recent studies have shown that HINT1 plays an important role as a platform protein in the formation of the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) MOR (µ-opioid receptor) and CNR1 (cannabinoid receptor type 1) [24,25].
The first crystal structure of HINT1 was published in 1996 [26], and the protein was first described as an inhibitor of protein kinase C [27] and later as PKCI (protein kinase C-interacting) [28]. The name “HINT” resulted from structural analysis [29]. Currently, many HINT1 structures are deposited in the PDB, including human [26,30,31,32], rabbit [29,33,34], and bacterial homologs [8,9,10]. The deposited structures show HINT either in the apo state [26] or as complexes with selected ligands—either substrate analogs or products of their hydrolysis [8,30,33]. The best resolution of data for HINT1 to date was 0.95 Å for a human homolog (PDB code 6j64) [35].
In vitro studies indicate that human HINT1 binds multiple nucleotides, e.g., adenosine-5’-monophosphate (AMP), adenosine-5’-diphosphate (ADP), and the diadenosine polyphosphates 5’,5’’-diadenosine triphosphate (Ap3A) and 5’,5’’-diadenosine tetraphosphate (Ap4A) [30]. Rabbit HINT1 (rHINT1) also binds certain purine nucleosides and nucleotides [29]. HINT proteins exert phosphoramidase activity toward adenosine 5’-O-phosphoramidate (AMP-NH2) [2]. Lysyl adenylate (produced by lysyl-tRNA synthetase (LysRS)) is also considered a substrate for HINT1 hydrolase [36,37]. HINT1-assisted hydrolysis of P–N bonds in nucleoside 5’-O-phosphoramidates [38] and desulfuration of nucleoside 5’-O-phosphorothioates [35,39] have been documented.
To date, all mammalian HINT1 structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank lack the first eleven N-terminal amino acids, and electron density maps show only the remaining 115 residues. The length of this truncated structure is similar to that of E. coli HINT1, which is shorter than the mammalian protein (119 amino acids). In the present manuscript, we show and discuss data demonstrating a nearly complete structure of the N-terminal part of the protein chain, refined to 1.43 Å. This improvement may be related to the modified arrangement of the HINT1 molecules in an asymmetric unit (compared to the previously reported crystal structures obtained in the same space group) when modified crystallization conditions were used.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cloning, Expression, and Purification of hHINT1

Human HINT1 protein was expressed and purified in an E. coli BL21 strain using a pSGA02-hHINT1 plasmid as previously described for rabbit HINT1 [40]. Purification was performed in one step by AMP-agarose (Sigma) affinity chromatography. The homogeneous protein preparation was dialyzed against a buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) and 150 mM NaCl, concentrated to a protein concentration of 10 mg mL−1, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C.

2.2. Crystallization of hHINT1

Human HINT1 was crystallized by a standard hanging drop variant of the vapor diffusion method using a protein solution with a concentration of 6 mg mL−1. Suitable crystals were obtained during crystallization experiments under Jena Biosciences JBScreen PACT ++ conditions. Aliquots of a 1.5 μL protein solution were mixed with a 1.5 μL precipitation solution and the crystallization droplets were suspended over a 500 µL precipitation solution. After 72 h of storage at 281 K under PACT ++ 2 D4 conditions (25% w/v PEG 1500 and 0.1 M MMT buffer pH 7.0), several suitable crystals (plate-shaped with typical dimensions 0.6 × 0.35 × 0.05 mm, Figure 1) were obtained.

2.3. Data Collection, Structure Determination, and Refinement

The crystals studied did not require cryoprotection, but were deposited on a very thin film of crystallization buffer. The excess liquid was removed by gently touching the mounting loop on the plate surface, and the crystal was then cooled directly in an N2 stream. Diffraction data were acquired with synchrotron radiation using a Dectris Pilatus 6M detector at the BL14.1 beamline of the BESSY II synchrotron (Berlin, Germany) [41]. The data were processed, integrated, and scaled using an XDS package [42]. Data acquisition and processing statistics are listed in Table 1.
The structure was solved by molecular replacement with MOLREP [43], using the protein model of the hHINT1 crystal structure (PDB entry 3tw2 [32]) as a search model. Refinement was performed using REFMAC5 [44]. After calculating an initial electron density map, the structure was completed by alternating manual building cycles (in the program COOT [45]), including rebuilding the main and side chains, adding alternative conformations of selected residues, loop fragments, ligand, and solvent molecules. All refinement steps were monitored using Rcryst and Rfree values. The stereochemical quality of the resulting model was evaluated using the program MOLPROBITY [46] and the validation tools implemented in COOT. The values of the mean temperature factors for the main and side chains of the protein, the ligands, and the water molecules were calculated using the BAVERAGE program from the CCP4 suite. Interface analysis was performed using an EBI PISA server [47]. The refinement statistics of the described structures are listed in Table 1. All figures were generated using PyMOL v.1.7 [48].

2.4. Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Positive ion MALDI-TOF mass spectra were acquired using a Voyager-Elite (PerSeptive Biosystems Inc., Framingham, MA, USA) instrument equipped with a nitrogen laser (337 nm) and operating in linear mode at 20 kV accelerating voltage and delayed extraction. A mixture of 10 mg mL−1 solution of trans-3,5-dimethoxy-4-hydroxycinnamic acid with 50% acetonitrile in water was used as the matrix. A 1 µL aliquot of the 10 pmol µL−1 protein solution in deionized water was mixed with 1 µL of the matrix on a MALDI plate and air dried. A mass spectrum from at least 100 laser shots was accumulated and analyzed using a Data Explorer ver. 4 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Overall Structure of a New Crystal Form of hHINT1 in Space Group P212121

The crystal structure of hHINT1 (an extended model refined to 1.43 Å and referred to here as form II, in contrast to previously published form I [26,30,49]) contains two protein molecules as well as 401 water molecules in the asymmetric unit, giving an R-factor of 0.224 (Rfree = 0.277). In addition, an L-malate ion (2-hydroxybutanedioic acid residue), a component of the crystallization buffer, was identified in the nucleotide-binding cleft of one of the chains. Almost all protein residues were in favored/allowed Ramachandran conformations, except Val10 of chain B. A pair of molecules around the non-crystallographic twofold symmetry axis parallel to the x-axis of the crystal formed a homodimer (Figure 2). Subunit dimerization was identical to that observed previously and occurs over a broad interfacial region providing multiple polar interactions and salt bridges between chains A and B on the accessible 1902.6 Å2 surface area. Each subunit exhibited the typical HINT1 fold and consisted of five β-strands and two α-helices. In contrast to previously published mammalian HINT1 structures, including those refined to atomic resolution, the detailed electron density analysis in maps 2 FOFC and FOFC allowed for an extension of the existing model so that the final HINT1 model of the form II included residues 6–126 of the A chain and 9–126 of the B chain. The data obtained allowed for modeling of alternative side-chain rotamers for nine residues of the A chain and ten residues of the B chain, with possible double or multiple conformations.

3.2. Two Crystal Forms—The Same Space Group

The form II of HINT1 was crystallized in an orthorhombic P212121 space group and showed significant differences compared to form I (PDB entry 5klz) [49]. The b and c unit cell parameters of the II form were smaller by 17% and 4%, respectively (form II: a = 46.08 Å, b = 63.38 Å, c = 76.84 Å; form I: a = 45.83 Å, b = 75.92 Å, c = 80.79 Å). A comparison of the calculated Matthews coefficients for form I (2.49 Å3 Da−1; 50.66% solvent content) and form II (2.03 Å3 Da−1; 39.51% solvent content) revealed that the crystals of form II were much more densely packed, with a loss of solvent content of more than 10% (Figure 3). The denser crystal packing dramatically increased the number of crystal contacts, from only three detected hydrogen bonds between symmetry-related molecules in form I to thirteen hydrogen bonds and eight salt bridges in form II. The size of the interface with symmetry-related protein chains increased from 940.3 Å2 (form I) to 1673.1 Å2 (form II) [47]. The observed degree of packing for form II was comparable to that previously observed in crystals of the C2 monoclinic space group (VM = 2.08 Å3 Da−1) [32]. Comparisons with other crystal forms listed in the Protein Data Bank are shown in Table 2.

3.3. Structure of the N-Terminus

Since the C-terminus of the HINT1 protein does not interact with other proteins, especially transcription factors, it is suggested that the N-terminus or some of its structural motifs may be responsible for the contacts with the binding partners of HINT1 [14]. Among the deposited crystal structures of mammalian HINT1, only the structure described here (PDB entry 6g9z) shows a fragment of the N-terminal part of the polypeptide chain, which has not been shown before. In the previously published structures of HINT1, only residues 12–126 were visible. The ordered state observed here is likely an artefact of crystal packing and is therefore probably not physiologically relevant. In solution, the N-terminal region likely remains disordered unless there are stabilizing protein–protein interactions. To be sure that the studied crystals contained the entire protein chain, mass spectrometry analysis was performed, which confirmed the presence of the intact HINT1 molecule (Figure 4). The major mass peak (m/z 13,679.8) corresponds to the entire protein chain with the initiation Met residue removed (13,670.7 Da).
Detailed analyses of the calculated electron density maps allowed for stepwise modeling of the remaining N-terminal fragments of chains A and B from residues Ala6 (Figure 5a) and Gln9, respectively. Residues 1–5 of chain A and 1–8 of chain B are not visible on the maps, perhaps because of the high flexibility of these regions indicated by high values of the thermal vibration factors of the visible fragments of the N-terminal parts. The different crystal packing of form II led to a decrease in the flexibility of the N-terminus of chain A when interacting with the following symmetry-related molecules: the chain A of SYM1 (4_445) and the chain B of SYM2 (3_545). The interactions arise from hydrogen bonds formed by the carbonyl oxygen of Ala8 with the NE2 atom of His42SYM1, the OE1 and NE2 atoms of Gln9 with the carbonyl oxygen atoms of Ile31SYM1 and Ile32SYM1, and the O and N atoms of the main chain of Ala11 with the corresponding atoms of Gln34SYM2, as well as by the salt bridge between the side chains of Arg12 and Asp87SYM1 (Figure 5b). The N-terminus of chain B is involved in interactions with the following symmetry-related molecules: SYM3 (4_455) and SYM4 (4_555). In this case, the number of visible interactions is reduced to hydrogen bonds between the carbonyl oxygen of Pro13 with the OG atom of Ser45SYM3 and the NE2 atom of Gln47SYM3, and between the NE2 atom of Gln9 with the OD1 and OD2 atoms of Asp69SYM4. In addition, several water molecules mediate the formation of non-direct hydrogen interactions between the N-terminal parts of chains A and B and symmetry-related protein molecules. Unfortunately, the quality of the calculated electron density maps decreased when Ala6 in chain A and Gln9 in chain B were reached, along with the observed perturbations due to solvent molecules, artifacts, and noncontinuous or weak density maps that cannot be reliably interpreted.

3.4. Analysis of the Nucleotide Binding Site/Ligand Molecule

HINT proteins bind purine nucleosides and nucleotides, although their nucleotide-binding motif differs in amino acid sequence from other nucleotide-binding proteins [51]. An analysis of the data for the hHINT1 form II (based on 2 FOFC and FOFC electron density maps) showed that no nucleotide ligands are bound in the cleft usually described as the active site [29,30], but we detected the presence of a single molecule of the L-malate ion in the binding pocket of chain B (Figure 6a). This ion was used as a component of the crystallization buffer, because the MMT buffer from the PACT++ crystallization screen consisted of DL-malic acid, MES and Tris base in the molar ratios 1:2:2, with a final buffer concentration of 100 mM. We observed that only the L-stereoisomer from the DL-malic acid mixture was recognized and bound by the HINT1 protein. L-malate interacts directly with the protein chain via four hydrogen bonds formed with three protein side chains: Asn99 (ND2 atom of Asn99 and O2 atom of L-malate), His112 (NE2 atom of His112 and O2 and O4A atoms of L-malate), and His114 (NE2 atom of His114 and O2 atom of L-malate). Additional interactions are formed by water molecules with the backbone of residues Asn99, Ser107, Val108, and His112 (Figure 6b), and with the side chain of the Asp43 residue (not shown in Figure 6). Although the binding of this molecule is rather incidental than intentional, this, along with the use of a different type of buffer, may have contributed to the changes in crystal packing that led to the stabilization of the N-terminus. This information can also be used to design and verify the binding properties of other compounds being developed as inhibitors/substrate analogs for HINTs.

4. Conclusions

The structure of a new crystal form of the human HINT1 protein (referred to here as form II), crystallized in space group P212121 has been determined and refined to 1.43 Å resolution. It is characterized by a different crystal packing than those previously published. By changing the crystallization conditions, especially the type of buffer used, crystals with a higher degree of packing and a larger number of crystal contacts between symmetrically connected molecules could be obtained. The tighter crystal packing caused stabilization of the N-terminal fragment of the HINT1 polypeptide chain by forming new interactions with neighboring molecules. The stabilized fragment of the N-terminus was found using the obtained diffraction data. We also found that HINT1 selectively binds the L-malate ion from the mixture of stereoisomers in the crystallization buffer, which was not previously described.

Author Contributions

Overexpression and purification of the protein, A.M.; crystallization, X-ray data collection, structure solution and refinement, data visualization, validation, deposition and analysis, writing—original draft, R.D.; writing—review and editing, supervision, B.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by CMMS PAS Statutory Funds, Poland.

Data Availability Statement

Atomic coordinates and structural factor amplitudes of the human HINT1 protein with visible extended N-terminus are available in the Protein Data Bank as entry 6g9z.

Acknowledgments

Diffraction data were collected at the BL14.1 beamline at the BESSY II electron storage ring at Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin (HZB), Germany. We would especially like to thank Martin Gerlach for his help and support during the experiments. The authors thank Piotr Guga for constructive suggestions and discussions and Ewelina Wielgus for mass spectrometric analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brenner, C. Hint, Fhit, and GalT: Function, structure, evolution, and mechanism of three branches of the histidine triad superfamily of nucleotide hydrolases and transferases. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 9003–9014. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Bieganowski, P.; Garrison, P.N.; Hodawadekar, S.C.; Faye, G.; Barnes, L.D.; Brenner, C. Adenosine monophosphoramidase activity of Hint and Hnt1 supports function of Kin28, Ccl1, and Tfb3. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 10852–10860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Parks, K.P.; Seidle, H.; Wright, N.; Sperry, J.B.; Bieganowski, P.; Howitz, K.; Wright, D.L.; Brenner, C. Altered specificity of Hint-W123Q supports a role for Hint inhibition by ASW in avian sex determination. Physiol. Genom. 2004, 20, 12–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Wu, L.; Wu, X.; Deng, H.; Huang, Y. First identification and functional analysis of a histidine triad nucleotide binding protein in an invertebrate species Haliotis diversicolor supertexta. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2010, 34, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Guranowski, A.; Wojdyla, A.M.; Rydzik, A.M.; Stepinski, J.; Jemielity, J. Plant nucleoside 5′-phosphoramidate hydrolase; simple purification from yellow lupin (Lupinus luteus) seeds and properties of homogenous enzyme. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2011, 58, 131–136. [Google Scholar]
  6. Korsisaari, N.; Rossi, D.J.; Luukko, K.; Huebner, K.; Henkemeyer, M.; Mäkelä, T.P. The histidine triad protein Hint is not required for murine development or Cdk7 function. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23, 3929–3935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Chou, T.-F.; Bieganowski, P.; Shilinski, K.; Cheng, J.; Brenner, C.; Wagner, C.R. 31P NMR and genetic analysis establish hint as the only Escherichia coli purine nucleoside phosphoramidase and as essential for growth under high salt conditions. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 15356–15361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Bardaweel, S.; Pace, J.; Chou, T.F.; Cody, V.; Wagner, C.R. Probing the impact of the echinT C-terminal domain on structure and catalysis. J. Mol. Biol. 2010, 404, 627–638. [Google Scholar]
  9. Baugh, L.; Phan, I.; Begley, D.W.; Clifton, M.C.; Armour, B.; Dranow, D.M.; Taylor, B.M.; Muruthi, M.M.; Abendroth, J.; Fairman, J.W.; et al. Increasing the structural coverage of tuberculosis drug targets. Tuberculosis 2015, 95, 142–148. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lorimer, D.D.; Choi, R.; Abramov, A.; Nakazawa Hewitt, S.; Gardberg, A.S.; Van Voorhis, W.C.; Staker, B.L.; Myler, P.J.; Edwards, T.E. Structures of a histidine triad family protein from Entamoeba histolytica bound to sulfate, AMP and GMP. Acta Crystallogr. F Struct. Biol. Commun. 2015, 71, 572–576. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee, Y.N.; Nechushtan, H.; Figov, N.; Razin, E. The function of lysyl-tRNA synthetase and Ap4A as signaling regulators of MITF activity in FcεRI-activated mast cells. Immunity 2004, 20, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Lee, Y.N.; Razin, E. Nonconventional involvement of LysRS in the molecular mechanism of USF2 transcriptional activity in FcεRI-activated mast cells. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 25, 8904–8912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Weiske, J.; Huber, O. The histidine triad protein Hint1 triggers apoptosis independent of its enzymatic activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 27356–27366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Cen, B.; Li, H.; Weinstein, I.B. Histidine triad nucleotide-binding protein 1 up-regulates cellular levels of p27KIP1 by targeting ScfSKP2 ubiquitin ligase and Src. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 5265–5276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Wang, L.; Li, H.; Zhang, Y.; Santella, R.M.; Weinstein, I.B. HINT1 inhibits beta-catenin/TCF4, USF2 and NFkappaB activity in human hepatoma cells. Int. J. Cancer 2009, 124, 1526–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Weiske, J.; Huber, O. The histidine triad protein Hint1 interacts with Pontin and Reptin and inhibits TCF-beta-catenin-mediated transcription. J. Cell Sci. 2005, 118, 3117–3129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Su, T.; Suzui, M.; Wang, L.; Lin, C.S.; Xing, W.Q.; Weinstein, I.B. Deletion of histidine triad nucleotide-binding protein1/PKC-interacting protein in mice enhances cell growth and carcinogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 7824–7829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, H.; Zhang, Y.; Su, T.; Santella, R.M.; Weinstein, I.B. Hint1 is a haplo-insufficient tumor suppressor in mice. Oncogene 2006, 25, 713–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; Xu, Z.; Santella, R.M.; Weinstein, I.B. Hint1 inhibits growth and activator protein-1 activity in human colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 4700–4708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hsieh, S.Y.; Hsu, C.Y.; He, J.R.; Liu, C.L.; Lo, S.J.; Chen, Y.C.; Huang, H.H. Identifying apoptosis-evasion proteins/pathways in human hepatoma cells via induction of cellular hormesis by UV irradiation. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 3977–3986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Y.-J.; Li, H.; Wu, H.-C.; Shen, J.; Wang, L.; Yu, M.-W.; Lee, P.-H.; Weinstein, I.B.; Santella, R.M. Silencing of Hint1, a novel tumor suppressor gene, by promoter hypermetylation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2009, 275, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Zambelli, D.; Zuntini, M.; Nardi, F.; Manara, M.C.; Serra, M.; Landuzzi, L.; Lollini, P.L.; Ferrari, S.; Alberghini, M.; Llombart-Bosch, A.; et al. Biological indicators of prognosis in Ewing’s sarcoma: An emerging role for lectin galactoside-binding soluble 3 binding protein (LGALS3BP). Int. J. Cancer 2010, 126, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zuk, K.; Peczek, L.; Stec-Michalska, K.; Medrek, M.; Nawrot, B. Family history of gastric cancer correlates with decreased expression of HINT1 tumor suppressor gene in gastric mucosa of dyspeptic patients. Oncol. Lett. 2012, 3, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rodríguez-Muñoz, M.; Garzón, J. Nitric oxide and zinc-mediated protein assemblies involved in mu opioid receptor signaling. Mol Neurobiol. 2013, 48, 769–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Vicente-Sánchez, A.; Sánchez-Blázquez, P.; Rodríguez-Muñoz, M.; Garzón, J. HINT1 protein cooperates with cannabinoid 1 receptor to negatively regulate glutamate NMDA receptor activity. Mol. Brain 2013, 6, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Lima, C.D.; Klein, M.G.; Weinstein, I.B.; Hendrickson, W.A. Three-dimensional structure of human protein kinase C interacting protein 1, a member of the HIT family of proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 5357–5362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pearson, J.D.; DeWald, D.B.; Mathews, W.R.; Mozier, N.M.; Zürcher-Neely, H.A.; Heinrikson, R.L.; Morris, M.A.; McCubbin, W.D.; McDonald, J.R.; Fraser, E.D.; et al. Amino acid sequence and characterization of a protein inhibitor of protein kinase C. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 265, 4583–4591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Klein, M.G.; Yao, Y.; Slosberg, E.D.; Lima, C.D.; Doki, Y.; Weinstein, I.B. Characterization of PKCI and comparative studies with FHIT, related members of the HIT protein family. Exp. Cell Res. 1998, 244, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Brenner, C.; Garrison, P.; Gilmour, J.; Peisach, D.; Ringe, D.; Petsko, G.A.; Lowenstein, J.M. Crystal structures of HINT1 demonstrate that histidine triad proteins are GalT-related nucleotide-binding proteins. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1997, 4, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lima, C.D.; Klein, M.G.; Hendrickson, W.A. Structure-based analysis of catalysis and substrate definition in the HIT protein family. Science 1997, 278, 286–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, J.; Fang, P.; Schimmel, P.; Guo, M. Side chains independent recognition of aminoacyl adenylates by the Hint1 transcription suppressor. J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 6798–6805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Dolot, R.; Ozga, M.; Włodarczyk, A.; Krakowiak, A.; Nawrot, B. A new crystal form of human histidine triad nucleotide-binding protein 1 (hHINT1) in complex with adenosine 5′-monophosphate at 1.38 Å resolution. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. F Struct. Cryst. Commun. 2012, 68, 883–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Krakowiak, A.; Pace, H.C.; Blackburn, M.; Adams, M.; Mekhalfia, A.; Kaczmarek, R.; Baraniak, J.; Stec, W.J.; Brenner, C. Biochemical, crystallographic, and mutagenic characterization of Hint1, the AMP-lysine hydrolase, with novel substrates and inhibitors. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 18711–18716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Dolot, R.; Ozga, M.; Krakowiak, A.; Nawrot, B. High-resolution X-ray structure of the rabbit histidine triad nucleotide-binding protein 1 (rHINT1)-adenosine complex at 1.10 Å resolution. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2011, 67, 601–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yu, J.; Liu, Z.; Liang, Y.; Luo, F.; Zhang, J.; Tian, C.; Motzik, A.; Zheng, M.; Kang, J.; Zhong, G.; et al. Second messenger Ap4A polymerizes target protein HINT1 to transduce signals in FcεRI-activated mast cell. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Chou, T.-F.; Wagner, C.R. Lysyl-tRNA synthetase-generated lysyl-adenylate is a substrate for histidine triad nucleotide binding proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 4719–4727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Chou, T.-F.; Tikh, I.B.; Horta, B.A.; Ghosh, B.; De Alencastro, R.B.; Wagner, C.R. Engineered monomeric human histidine triad nucleotide-binding protein 1 hydrolyzes fluorogenic acyl-adenylate and lysyl-tRNA synthetase-generated lysyl-adenylate. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 15137–15147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Murakami, E.; Tolstykh, T.; Bao, H.; Niu, C.; Steuer, H.M.; Bao, D.; Chang, W.; Espiritu, C.; Bansal, S.; Lam, A.M.; et al. Mechanism of activation of PSI-7851 and its diastereoisomer PSI-7977. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 34337–34347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Krakowiak, A.; Kaczmarek, R.; Baraniak, J.; Wieczorek, M.; Stec, W.J. Stereochemistry of rHint1 hydrolase assisted cleavage of P-N bond in nucleoside 5′-O-phosphoramidothioates. Chem. Commun. 2007, 21, 2163–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gilmour, J.; Liang, N.; Lowenstein, J.M. Isolation, cloning and characterization of a low-molecular -mass purine nucleoside- and nucleotide-binding-protein. Biochem. J. 1997, 326, 471–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Mueller, U.; Darowski, N.; Fuchs, M.R.; Förster, R.; Hellmig, M.; Paithankar, K.S.; Pühringer, S.; Steffien, M.; Zocher, G.; Weiss, M.S. Facilities for macromolecular crystallography at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2012, 19, 442–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kabsch, W. Integration, scaling, space-group assignment and post-refinement. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010, 66, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Vagin, A.; Teplyakov, A. Molecular replacement with MOLREP. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010, 66, 22–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Murshudov, G.N.; Skubák, P.; Lebedev, A.A.; Pannu, N.S.; Steiner, R.A.; Nicholls, R.A.; Winn, M.D.; Long, F.; Vagin, A.A. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2011, 67, 355–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Emsley, P.; Lohkamp, B.; Scott, W.G.; Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010, 66, 486–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Williams, C.J.; Headd, J.J.; Moriarty, N.W.; Prisant, M.G.; Videau, L.L.; Deis, L.N.; Verma, V.; Keedy, D.A.; Hintze, B.J.; Chen, V.B.; et al. MolProbity: More and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci. 2018, 27, 293–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Krissinel, E.; Henrick, K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 372, 774–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. DeLano, W.L. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System; DeLano Scientific: San Carlos, CA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  49. Maize, K.M.; Shah, R.; Strom, A.; Kumarapperuma, S.; Zhou, A.; Wagner, C.R.; Finzel, B.C. A crystal structure based guide to the design of human histidine triad nucleotide binding protein (hHINT1) activated ProTides. Mol. Pharm. 2017, 14, 3987–3997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kabsch, W.; Sander, C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983, 22, 2577–2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Varnum, J.M.; Baraniak, J.; Kaczmarek, R.; Stec, W.J.; Brenner, C. Di-, tri- and tetra-5′-O-phosphorothioadenosyl substituted polyols as inhibitors of Fhit: Importance of the alpha-beta bridging oxygen and beta phosphorus replacement. BMC Chem. Biol. 2001, 1, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Laskowski, R.A.; Swindells, M.B. LigPlot+: Multiple ligand-protein interaction diagrams for drug discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 2778–2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Crystals of hHINT1 obtained from JBScreen PACT++2 D4 conditions.
Figure 1. Crystals of hHINT1 obtained from JBScreen PACT++2 D4 conditions.
Crystals 13 01197 g001
Figure 2. Cartoon representation of the hHINT1 dimer with extended N-terminus (based on PDB entry 6g9z). Structural elements are shown in red (α-helices) and blue (β-strands). Each monomer is shown in a darker (chain A) and lighter (chain B) color scheme. The secondary structure elements were assigned using DSSP [50]. The views after a 90° rotation are shown below.
Figure 2. Cartoon representation of the hHINT1 dimer with extended N-terminus (based on PDB entry 6g9z). Structural elements are shown in red (α-helices) and blue (β-strands). Each monomer is shown in a darker (chain A) and lighter (chain B) color scheme. The secondary structure elements were assigned using DSSP [50]. The views after a 90° rotation are shown below.
Crystals 13 01197 g002
Figure 3. Crystal packing diagram of two forms of human HINT1 crystallized in space group P212121: (ac) hHINT1 form II with visible N-terminus (based on PDB entry 6g9z) and (df) hHINT1 form I (based on PDB entry 5klz) [49]. Shown are views along crystallographic axes: a (a,d), b (b,e), and c (c,f).
Figure 3. Crystal packing diagram of two forms of human HINT1 crystallized in space group P212121: (ac) hHINT1 form II with visible N-terminus (based on PDB entry 6g9z) and (df) hHINT1 form I (based on PDB entry 5klz) [49]. Shown are views along crystallographic axes: a (a,d), b (b,e), and c (c,f).
Crystals 13 01197 g003
Figure 4. Positive-ion spectrum MALDI-TOF, obtained for the sample of hHINT1 protein crystals used in this study.
Figure 4. Positive-ion spectrum MALDI-TOF, obtained for the sample of hHINT1 protein crystals used in this study.
Crystals 13 01197 g004
Figure 5. The N-terminal fragment of chain A of the hHINT1 protein. (a) The protein chain is shown in the stick representation. The electron density map 2 FOFC (colored light blue) at the 0.6σ level was derived from data at 1.43 Å resolution (PDB entry 6g9z). (b) Location of the N-terminus (green) between the symmetry-related molecules SYM1 (cyan) and SYM2 (yellow). Hydrogen bonds formed between amino acid residues of the N-terminal part of chain A and the symmetry-related molecules are shown as dashed black lines. Amino acid residues involved in the interactions are shown in stick mode. The red and blue sticks indicate oxygen and nitrogen atoms, respectively.
Figure 5. The N-terminal fragment of chain A of the hHINT1 protein. (a) The protein chain is shown in the stick representation. The electron density map 2 FOFC (colored light blue) at the 0.6σ level was derived from data at 1.43 Å resolution (PDB entry 6g9z). (b) Location of the N-terminus (green) between the symmetry-related molecules SYM1 (cyan) and SYM2 (yellow). Hydrogen bonds formed between amino acid residues of the N-terminal part of chain A and the symmetry-related molecules are shown as dashed black lines. Amino acid residues involved in the interactions are shown in stick mode. The red and blue sticks indicate oxygen and nitrogen atoms, respectively.
Crystals 13 01197 g005
Figure 6. The nucleotide binding site of hHINT1 with bound L-malate anion. (a) The view of the binding site indicating Asn99, His112, and His114 residues involved in the L-malate ion direct binding. The hydrogen bonds between the ligand atoms and the nearby protein side chains are shown as dashed orange lines. The OMIT FOFC map of the L-malate molecule is contoured at the 3.0σ level based on data with a resolution of 1.43 Å (PDB entry 6g9z). (b) Schematic diagram of the binding site of the hHINT1/L-malate complex. Hydrogen -bonding interactions between L-malate atoms and nearby side chains and water molecules are shown as dashed lines. C atoms are shown in black, O atoms in red and N atoms in blue. Water molecules are shown in cyan. The L-malate ion is labeled as “LMR”, according to the code used in PDB. This diagram was prepared with LIGPLOT [52].
Figure 6. The nucleotide binding site of hHINT1 with bound L-malate anion. (a) The view of the binding site indicating Asn99, His112, and His114 residues involved in the L-malate ion direct binding. The hydrogen bonds between the ligand atoms and the nearby protein side chains are shown as dashed orange lines. The OMIT FOFC map of the L-malate molecule is contoured at the 3.0σ level based on data with a resolution of 1.43 Å (PDB entry 6g9z). (b) Schematic diagram of the binding site of the hHINT1/L-malate complex. Hydrogen -bonding interactions between L-malate atoms and nearby side chains and water molecules are shown as dashed lines. C atoms are shown in black, O atoms in red and N atoms in blue. Water molecules are shown in cyan. The L-malate ion is labeled as “LMR”, according to the code used in PDB. This diagram was prepared with LIGPLOT [52].
Crystals 13 01197 g006
Table 1. Crystallographic parameters, data collection and refinement statistics for the HINT1 structure described here. Values in parentheses correspond to the highest resolution shell.
Table 1. Crystallographic parameters, data collection and refinement statistics for the HINT1 structure described here. Values in parentheses correspond to the highest resolution shell.
PDB Entry6g9z
Space groupP212121
Wavelength (Å)0.96690
Unit-cell parameters
a (Å)46.08
b (Å)63.38
c (Å)76.84
Total no. of reflections154,268
Unique reflections40,954
Resolution (Å)39.52–1.43 (1.51–1.43)
Completeness (%)96.1 (92.7)
CC(1/2) (%)99.4 (83.3)
Rmergea (%)13.7 (70.3)
Redundancy3.77
Mosaicity (°)0.21
Wilson B factor (Å2)15.0
Mean I/σ(I)8.78 (1.96)
Refinement statistics
No. reflections used in refinement38,759
No. reflections used to Rfree2041
Rcryst (Rfree) b0.224/0.277
No. non-H atoms
Protein1998
Solvent401
Ligands9 (malate ion)
R.m.s.d. from ideal values
Bond lengths (Å)0.016
Bond angles (°)1.812
Ramachandran plot c
Favored (%)98.4
Allowed (%)1.2
Outliers (%)0.4
Mean B values d
Protein (Å2)8.53
Malate ion (Å2)14.26
Water (Å2)25.53
a  R m e r g e = h i | I i ( h ) I ( h ) | / h i I i ( h ) , where Ii(h) is the intensity of an individual measurement of the reflection and 〈I(h)〉 is the mean intensity of the reflection. b  R c r y s t = h | | F o | | F c | | / h | F o | for all reflections, where FO and FC are observed and calculated structure factors, respectively. Rfree is calculated analogously for the test reflections, randomly selected, and excluded from the refinement. c Calculated using MOLPROBITY. d Calculated using BAVERAGE.
Table 2. Examples of different crystal forms of human HINT1 protein presented in Protein Data Bank.
Table 2. Examples of different crystal forms of human HINT1 protein presented in Protein Data Bank.
Space GroupPDB IDCell Dimensions
a, b, c [Å], α, β, γ [°]
Matthews Coefficient
3 Da−1]
Solvent Content
[%]
Triclinic
P16j5z45.42 45.44 63.92
86.57 86.48 61.35
2.0740.54
Monoclinic
P214zkl63.71 46.42 103.43
90 97.41 90
3.0359.45
P214zkv46.21 79.00 63.88
90 90.10 90
2.2745.92
P215km064.33 89.59 46.37
90 90.03 90
2.3748.10
C23tw277.42 46.45 64.03
90 94.42 90
2.0840.75
Orthorhombic
P2121215klz45.83 75.92 80.79
90 90 90
2.4950.66
Tetragonal
P417q2u112.89 112.89 43.63
90 90 90
2.5251.18
P432126b4239.74 39.74 141.13
90 90 90
1.9837.76
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dolot, R.; Mikołajczyk, A.; Nawrot, B. Crystal Packing Differences as a Key Factor for Stabilization of the N-Terminal Fragment of the Human HINT1 Protein. Crystals 2023, 13, 1197. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13081197

AMA Style

Dolot R, Mikołajczyk A, Nawrot B. Crystal Packing Differences as a Key Factor for Stabilization of the N-Terminal Fragment of the Human HINT1 Protein. Crystals. 2023; 13(8):1197. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13081197

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dolot, Rafał, Aleksandra Mikołajczyk, and Barbara Nawrot. 2023. "Crystal Packing Differences as a Key Factor for Stabilization of the N-Terminal Fragment of the Human HINT1 Protein" Crystals 13, no. 8: 1197. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13081197

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop