Next Article in Journal
Cerebral Myelination in a Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Murine Model
Previous Article in Journal
Neurodevelopmental Outcome of Very Low Birth Weight Infants in the Northern District of Israel: A Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Children
Volume 10
Issue 8
10.3390/children10081322
children-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Ambient Air Pollutants on Hospital Admissions among Children Due to Asthma and Wheezing-Associated Lower Respiratory Infections in Mysore, India: A Time Series Study

by
Sowmya Malamardi
1,
Katrina Lambert
1,
Jayaraj Biligere Siddaiah
2,
Bircan Erbas
1,† and
Padukudru Anand Mahesh
2,*,†
1
Department of Public Health, School of Psychology & Public Health, College of Science Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia
2
Department of Respiratory Medicine, JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research (JSSAHER), JSS Medical College, Mysore 570015, Karnataka, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Children 2023, 10(8), 1322; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10081322
Submission received: 14 June 2023 / Revised: 14 July 2023 / Accepted: 20 July 2023 / Published: 31 July 2023
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Air pollutants are known to trigger asthma and wheezing-associated lower respiratory infections in children, but evidence regarding their effect on hospital admissions in India is limited. We conducted a time-series study over a period of five years to assess the role of ambient air pollutants in daily asthma-related hospital admissions in children in Mysore, India. Daily asthma and wheeze (associated with lower respiratory infections) admissions were modelled using a generalised additive model (GAM) to examine the non-linear effects and generalised linear models (GLM) for linear effects, if any. Models were adjusted by day of the week and lag days, with smooth terms for time, maximum temperature, and relative humidity, and they were stratified by sex and age group. Of the 362 children admitted, more than 50% were boys, and the mean age was 5.34 years (±4.66). The GAMs showed non-linear associations between NO2, PM2.5, and NH3. For example, a 10 µgm−3 (or 10%) increase in NO2 increased admissions by 2.42. These non-linear effects were more pronounced in boys. A linear effect was detected for PM10 with a relative risk (95% CI) of 1.028, 1.013, and 1.043 with admission. Further research is needed to explore whether these findings can be replicated in different cities in India. Air pollution needs to be controlled, and policies that focus on lower cut-off levels for vulnerable populations are necessary.

1. Introduction

Asthma is a non-communicable disease most common in children and adolescents [1]; it is characterised by coughing, wheezing, dyspnoea, and chest tightness [2], and requires immediate medical care at a hospital [3,4]. Asthma in children is an important global health burden [5]. Several environmental, individual, and familial factors are associated with hospitalisation for asthma in children [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Understanding the triggers for hospitalization is important, as a high rate of admissions is a burden on the individual, the carer, and the hospital system.
In India, air pollution is one of the leading environmental risk factors contributing to the global burden of disease (GBD) [12], especially in urban areas [11]. Key pollutants are particulate matter of an aerodynamic diameter no greater than 2.5 µm or 10 µm (PM2.5, PM10), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), or sulphur dioxide (SO2) [13,14]. In India, both burning of biomass and industrial activity (fertilisers) are common, and thus studying NH3 emissions is also important [15]. However, studies exploring the effects of air pollution on hospital admissions for asthma are limited to major cities in India, such as Delhi [16,17,18,19,20]. Hence, it is important to understand the impacts of air pollution on other cities with differing levels of environmental factors and that are not heavily polluted, such as Mysore, India.
Hospital admissions related to asthma are adverse events due to constriction of the airways and inflammation from exposure to air pollutants [21], which critically increase risk of hospitalisation [22]. The condition is episodic and reversible based on severity and individual response, but it is also preventable [23,24]. Emergency departmental visits due to asthma are high in children and adolescents [25], contributing to a higher disease burden for children, families, and hospitals. We aimed to study the association between air pollution and daily asthma-related hospital admissions (including wheeze-associated lower respiratory infections) in children and adolescents. A secondary aim was to assess differences in estimate effects based on sex and age strata.

2. Materials and Methods

We conducted a retrospective time-series study from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021. The study population comprised children aged less than 9 years and adolescents aged 10–19 years with asthma and wheezing-associated lower respiratory infections (WALRI) residing in Mysore, India (an area of 152.05 km2). Mysore is geographically situated in the southern part of the state of Karnataka, India, and lies at 12°18′ North latitude and 76°38′ East longitude, including ~4.17 million people. The study commenced after ethical approval was obtained from JSS Medical College and Hospital (ECR/387/Inst/KA/2013/RR-19). The data on asthma and WALRI hospital admissions on children and adolescents were composed of ICD-9 codes (493) and ICD-10 codes (J45, J46, or R06.2). A manual medical record abstraction by the medical staff and electronic health records review was conducted to collect data from the tertiary hospital. We included WALRIs as admissions in children 0–2 years of age, as asthma diagnosis is unreliable in this age group; this included all patterns of wheezing (never, transient early, late-onset, and persistent) [26,27]. Patients with unspecified asthma (J45.90x) and other associated severe respiratory infections were excluded. We reviewed the hospital records and harmonised the data from the daily hospital admissions. Patients admitted for any other cause were excluded. The counts of daily admissions for asthma exacerbations were noted. The daily counts of admissions did not comprise emergency room visits, as the treatment and management was different in the tertiary hospital. If the patient failed to respond to emergency care within 24 h, inpatient admission followed, and we have included those cases. Hence, we analysed these data as a continuous time-series study by achieving a sufficient sample size for reliable estimates, though the annual rate of admissions varied.
We included air pollutants particulate matter of up to 2.5 µm in diameter (PM2.5) and up to 10 µm (PM10), sulphur dioxide (SO2,), and nitrous oxide (NO2). We also included NH3, as ammoniated aerosols form a part of the particulate matter [28]. The air quality monitoring stations set up by India’s National Ambient air quality Monitoring Program (NAMP) were our sources of ambient air pollutants data collected from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021 [29]. In the city of Mysore, a manual air quality monitoring station was set up twice a week, which collected data on air pollutant parameters for 24 h, totalling 104 observations in each year. The protocol for data collection was at least two measurements per week, but the day of measurement varied depending on the period of data collection. Each pollutant was measured twice a week. We took a running cumulative average in between the two measures for each day of week. We also adjusted for these lags in our models. For example, if PM2.5 was collected only on 6 January 2017 and 10 January 2017, we took the measurement on the 6th, averaged across the 4 days before the next measurement, and then followed this process at the next measurement.
Data on daily measure of weather parameters, including maximum and minimum temperature (in degree Celsius) and percentage of relative humidity, were obtained from the appropriate publicly accessible databases www.weatheronline.in (accessed on 11 May 2022) and national ambient air quality monitoring station (NAAQS). Individual characteristics such as weight/height at admission, sociodemographic characteristics, and family history of asthma were obtained from the hospital records. A standard and widely accepted revised Kuppaswamy scale (2021) was used to capture socio-economic status (SES) data [30]. The CDC BMI classification designed to monitor the growth of children and teens aged 2–19 years was used in the study and standardised for the study population [31].
We conducted a time-series analysis of daily hospitalisations as the outcome variable and each pollutant’s daily average concentrations as the primary exposure variables separately. We assessed correlations between air pollutants (PM2.5, PM10, NO2, SO2, and NH3) and the meteorological factors (maximum temperature, relative humidity, and precipitation), thus generating a correlation matrix using Spearman’s correlation statistics. We described the characteristics of each admission and used statistical tests for comparisons depending on the distribution and definition of each variable. All data were analysed using Stata IC16 (STATA Corp., College Station, TX, USA).
We used Generalised Additive Models (GAMs) to assess the associations between each pollutant and admissions. As daily hospital admissions follow a probability of an event, we used Poisson distribution with the log link. Over dispersion was not present. SO2 was below detectable levels during the study and we did not include it in subsequent analyses. We first fitted a (GAM) to assess any non-linear effects for each air pollutant while adjusting for weather parameters (temperature and humidity), day of the week, and season. We chose the best-fitting models, which yielded the minimum Akaike information criterion (AIC) and maximum log links. If the GAMs showed no statistically significant linear effects, we reverted to generalised linear regression models (GLMs). R software (4.2.2v) was used for the analysis, and the results were reported as effect measures (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The graph plotting for this time series study involving R software (4.2.2v) used mgcv, mgcViz, and ggplot2 packages [32,33].

3. Results

There were 362 admissions between 2017 and 2021, with a total of 194 young (aged less than five years) and 168 older (aged more than or equal to five years) patients admitted to the tertiary care hospital in Mysore during the study period (Table 1). The participants’ mean age was 5.34 years (±4.66), with 83.89% aged less than ten years and 65.56% boys (n = 232). The mean (SD) average duration of hospital stay was slightly higher among boys, 3.77 (3.10) days, compared to girls, 3.54 (1.88). Of the total sample, 11.84% belonged to a lower socioeconomic status. Most of the children had a normal BMI (79.4%), followed by obese (10.3%), underweight (6.4%) and overweight 15 (4.2%). We observed a family history of asthma in a small number of subjects: paternal (11.71%), maternal (7.43%) and siblings (2.61%).
Over the 1826-day duration of the study, there were a total of 362 hospital admissions for asthma (N = 211) and WALRI (N = 151) (Table 2). We display the time series graph in Supplementary Figure S1. There was a decline in admissions during the COVID-19 lockdown in India. The admissions peaked during the monsoon (43.89%), then winter (21.39%), autumn (18.61%) and summer (16.11%). No difference was observed between boys and girls. There was a significant difference in admissions across months (p < 0.0001), and September had the highest admissions in a year, followed by August (Table 2). The number of asthma admissions on weekdays was higher than at weekends, and the highest numbers reported were on Tuesdays and Thursdays (p < 0.012). Small to moderate correlations were observed between air pollutants and weather parameters in this study (Supplementary Table S1).
We examined each air pollutant separately to assess the potential non-linear effects on daily asthma admission using the GAM framework. The effects of NO2, PM2.3, and NH3 were non-linear in adjusted models (Table 3). PM10 was not associated with admissions related to asthma/WALRI (Table 3). When models were stratified by boys/girls, our models showed that daily admissions in boys were higher with an increase in the air pollutants NO2, PM2.5, and PM10, but the same was not true for girls. We constructed smooth plots to show the non-linear effects between the pollutants and outcome (online Supplementary Figures S2–S5). When the results were stratified for boys, we found that the fitted non-linear curve for NO2 and PM2.5 resembled the figure for all children, suggesting that boys generally drive this trend. Interestingly, PM10 exposures only among boys were non-linear (online Supplementary Figure S4) but the same did not apply to girls. Among children, the effect of NH3 was non-linear and at higher levels of NH3 (>20 µgm−3), the number of hospital admissions declined (online Supplementary Figure S5).
The log relative risk of asthma hospital admissions for the PM10 effects showed linear relationships (Table 4). Daily exposure to PM10 was associated with daily admissions RR = 1.028 (95% CI 1.013, 1.043); there were no significant differences across sex and age groups.

4. Discussion

The current study is the first conducted in Mysore, India, to show that ambient air pollutants increase the risk of hospital admissions for asthma and wheeze (WALRI) among children and adolescents. Generative Additive Models detected non-linear associations with NO2, PM2.5, and NH3. The expected risk of daily asthma admissions, given children exposed to PM10, was linear with a RR = 1.028 and 95% CI (1.013, 1.043). These effects were pronounced in boys, but no such associations were observed among girls.
Our GAM models show that an increase in NO2 concentration was associated with an increase in asthma-related hospital admissions at lower levels, with a similar association having been observed in studies in the Netherlands [34] and the US [35]. Traffic pollutants contribute NO2 in the atmosphere, which is strongly associated with vehicular emissions and secondary formation of secondary pollutants (such as fine particles, ozone, and others) [36]. Recent studies reporting emissions from buses [37] have shown a high contribution of ambient NOx, especially in cities like Mysore [38].
PM2.5 had a non-linear association with asthma hospitalisation in our study, with increasing levels above 10 µgm−3 associated with increased daily asthma hospital admission rates. Similarly, in a study conducted in Ahmedabad, an increase in the concentration of PM2.5 was associated with an increase in the respiratory admissions (winter: RR = 1.16 95% CI = 1.007–1.23) [39]. With the interquartile range increase in PM2.5, a Taiwan study observed significant increases in asthma hospitalisation among children under 18 years old (RR = 1.156; CI = 1.142–1.170; p < 0.001) [24]. PM is a complex mixture of solid and liquid particles suspended in air and originates from the combustion process of diesel and gasoline-powered vehicles, burning of biomass, and burning of coal to generate power [24], affecting various pathways and causing differential health effects [40,41]. PM2.5 penetrates alveolar portions of the lung; the particles translocate to blood circulation through these alveolar capillaries while PM10 is trapped in the upper part of the lower respiratory tract, thus causing increased dose responses effects more closely related to PM2.5 than PM10 [42]. However, PM2.5 related to residential biomass fuel emissions is the most significant contributor to ambient levels across India, followed by the combustion of agricultural residue [43]. A study has shown that an increase in PM2.5 due to vehicular emissions over the years comprised 50% of vehicular emissions from heavy diesel vehicles and PM10 of all types of emissions [44].
In our study, the effect of PM10 on asthma-related hospital admissions was linearly associated. Samoli et al. showed a 2.54% increase in the number of daily paediatric asthma hospital admissions with increased 10 µgm−3 PM10 exposure [45]. With an interquartile range increase in PM10, a Taiwan study observed significant increases in asthma hospitalisation (RR = 1.120; CI = 1.107–1.134; p < 0.001) [24]. For India, residential and industrial sectors were the largest contributors, followed by power and transportation [46], while non-exhaust emission sources can also play a significant role in PM10 emissions [19].
We also identified some effects of NH3 exposure. There are few studies related to NH3 and asthma hospitalisation, but some studies have evidenced the effects [47,48]. Sources of NH3 include agriculture processes, industries (fertiliser and pharmaceutical) and vehicular emissions [48]. The effects of NH3 may be detrimental, as studies have shown that children exposed to such environments experience asthma and other respiratory symptoms [49,50]. In 2017, more than half India’s population (56%) remained exposed to household air pollution, and about one-third of the population still uses solid fuels in Karnataka.
Chakraborty (2014) in Kolkata, India, studied the effects of PM10 using GAM regression analysis and found that PM10 was associated with increased emergency asthma hospitalisation in school-aged children [51]. However, our study is on admissions and is not directly comparable. However, many of the studies in India focus on emergency department (ED) presentations, and a portion of these would account for admissions themselves, so they are relevant in terms of which pollutants may be impacting ED [20] and respiratory admissions [39]. The scatter plots present smooth S-shaped curves (Supplement Figures S3 and S4), where the risk of admission increases from a low level below a critical exposure concentration threshold to a high level above it; the curves appear to be smooth, meaning associations are linear at low doses at low levels [52,53,54]. Similarly, at low concentration levels of PM2.5, there is a short-term risk associated with exacerbation of asthma and associated hospital admissions. We observed exposure concentration response through our time series epidemiological study, presenting the linear and non-linear association of PM10, PM2.5, NO2, and NH3 and asthma-related hospital admissions in children. But to understand how a change in exposure would change the risks associated with respiratory health, a higher modelling, such as the use of Bayesian networks and dynamic simulation models, potentially supports in understanding the causally interpretable non-linear pattern of association [55].
Physiologically, the airways of boys are smaller than those of girls [56,57,58,59], making them prone to an increased number of respiratory infections and prevalence of asthma [60]; thus, they are twice as likely to be hospitalised compared to girls. Our study showed a greater number of asthma admissions among boys (n = 65.56%), with higher admissions for some pollutants in boys and not girls. Many studies have shown that air pollution affects boys and not girls. A study in Taiwan observed high asthma admissions among boys compared to girls, which is consistent with our findings [24]. An extensive database study in the US observed similar gender differences [61].
The viral respiratory panel (VRP) test is designed to detect viral pathogens in the respiratory tract, which may contribute to the exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), as the upper and lower respiratory tract infections are caused by a broad range of microbes and not only bacteria [62]. Opara et al. have discussed the advantages of VRP tests in acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) among 18–65-year-old adults. Studies have also demonstrated the benefits of utilising the rapid panel test of respiratory viral and atypical bacteria on the aetiological diagnosis of acute lower respiratory infection (ALRI) and rational use of antibiotics [63]. A study conducted in the UAE reported that RVP multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests in children offer benefits such as lower hospitalisation rates and rational use of antibiotics, making them a cost-effective clinical management tool, and may be beneficial due to the viral aetiology in asthma [64]. Unfortunately, VRP was not tested in children admitted with lower respiratory tract infections in tertiary centres in India.
Overall, this study had several strengths. The relationship between pollutants and asthma admissions was evaluated over five years, which adds robustness to the observations. A major strength of our study is that we had access to hospital records for a major hospital in Mysore, which is used by most of the population, and can be generalisable to populations like those in Mysore. Most of the studies in India have been conducted in cities with higher air pollution than Mysore. This study was the first in South India to focus on children; it evaluated the relationship between air pollutants and asthma-related conditions in a city with moderate to low pollution levels and provided insight into the impact of air pollution on asthma admissions in regions with lower pollution levels. The study had several limitations as well. A small sample size (in this case, 0 to 1 admissions on a given day) limits statistical power when conducting stratified analyses. Another limitation is the combination of asthma and WALRI in a single group. The exposure data in the first half of the study did not include daily measurements, so we could not assess lags. Ozone is also an important air pollutant. However, data collection and analysis occurred after this study began, and the exclusion of ozone may influence the findings. Our study observed a slight decline in hospital admissions after the first 3 years. Hospitalisation rates could reflect decreases in the frequency and severity of asthma exacerbations. However, other factors should also be considered, such as the COVID-19 epidemic that affected the dependent (asthma admissions) and exposure factors (ambient air pollutants); further research on post-COVID-19 trends would provide further insight. Unlike in prospective cohort studies, the multipollutant model interpretation may not strongly add to the casual interpretation. Therefore, we have opted not to conduct multi-pollutant models, with single pollutant models being the main interpretation from the analysis.

5. Conclusions

Even though some of the pollutants are slightly above the WHO standard, these findings need to be considered when government departments are revisiting the development of pollutant standards. India is focused on self-committed targets for reducing emissions, in accordance with the Paris Agreement [12]. Our study provides further insights into this growing problem of environmental triggers influencing respiratory-related conditions in children and adolescents. Further research over longer periods and different cities in India is necessary to replicate our findings.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/children10081322/s1, Figure S1: Time series graphs of all daily asthma hospital admissions for the year 2017–2021; Figure S2: GAM plot* of NO2 for children (n = 362); Figure S3: GAM plot* of PM2.5 for children (n = 362); Figure S4: GAM plot* of PM10 for boys (n = 232); Figure S5: GAM plot* of NH3 for children (n = 362); and Table S1: Spearman’s correlations between air pollutants and weather parameters.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, B.E. and P.A.M.; methodology, B.E. and K.L.; software, S.M.; validation, J.B.S., S.M. and K.L.; formal analysis, S.M.; investigation, J.B.S.; resources, S.M.; data curation, S.M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M.; writing—review and editing, B.E. and K.L.; visualisation, K.L.; supervision, B.E.; project administration, P.A.M. and J.B.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of JSS Medical College and Hospital (ECR/387/Inst/KA/2013/RR-19) dated 11 March 2020.

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to the medical record-based data collection.

Data Availability Statement

The data and materials used in this study can be made available on request through an email to the corresponding author of this study. The analysis code is obtainable from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support of the Karnataka State Pollution Control Board, Mysore, for their administrative support and data collection during this research study. We thank JSS Hospital for cooperating with data extraction, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. We thank Greeshma MV, a researcher, for her extra help with the data acquisition at sporadic times.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. WHO. Asthma. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/asthma (accessed on 21 January 2023).
  2. GINA. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention; Global INitiative for Asthma: Washington, DC, USA, 2022; pp. 1–222. Available online: www.ginasthma.org (accessed on 30 October 2022).
  3. Yang, J.F.; Chaudhuri, R.; Thomson, N.C.; Ramparsad, N.; O’Pray, H.; Barclay, S.; MacBride-Stewart, S.; McCallum, C.; Sharma, V.; McSharry, C.; et al. Insights into frequent asthma exacerbations from a primary care perspective and the implications of UK National Review of Asthma Deaths recommendations. NPJ Prim. Care Respir. Med. 2018, 28, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. DiMango, E.; Rogers, L.; Reibman, J.; Gerald, L.B.; Brown, M.; Sugar, E.A.; Henderson, R.; Holbrook, J.T. Risk Factors for Asthma Exacerbation and Treatment Failure in Adults and Adolescents with Well-controlled Asthma during Continuation and Step-Down Therapy. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2018, 15, 955–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Porsbjerg, C.; Melén, E.; Lehtimäki, L.; Shaw, D. Asthma. Lancet 2023, 401, 858–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Weinmayr, G.; Romeo, E.; De Sario, M.; Weiland, S.K.; Forastiere, F. Short-Term Effects of PM₁₀ and NO₂ on Respiratory Health among Children with Asthma or Asthma-like Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Environ. Health Perspect. 2010, 118, 449–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Iskandar, A.; Andersen, Z.J.; Bønnelykke, K.; Ellermann, T.; Andersen, K.K.; Bisgaard, H. Coarse and fine particles but not ultrafine particles in urban air trigger hospital admission for asthma in children. Thorax 2012, 67, 252–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ross, K.; Chmiel, J.F.; Ferkol, T. The Impact of the Clean Air Act. J. Pediatr. 2012, 161, 781–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Gleason, J.A.; Bielory, L.; Fagliano, J.A. Associations between ozone, PM2.5, and four pollen types on emergency department pediatric asthma events during the warm season in New Jersey: A case-crossover study. Environ. Res. 2014, 132, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Malamardi, S.; Lambert, K.A.; Batra, M.; Tham, R.; Padukudru Anand, M.; Erbas, B. A systematic review of the evidence of outdoor air pollution on asthma hospital visits in children and adolescents in South Asia—A call for data. Wellcome Open Res. 2021, 6, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dąbrowiecki, P.; Chciałowski, A.; Dąbrowiecka, A.; Badyda, A. Ambient Air Pollution and Risk of Admission Due to Asthma in the Three Largest Urban Agglomerations in Poland: A Time-Stratified, Case-Crossover Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Khilnani, C.G.; Tiwari, C.P. Air pollution in India and related adverse respiratory health effects: Past, present, and future directions. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2018, 24, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guarnieri, M.M.D.; Balmes, J.R.D. Outdoor air pollution and asthma. Lancet 2014, 383, 1581–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. WHO. Air Pollution. Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/air-pollution? (accessed on 21 January 2021).
  15. Kumar, A.; Patil, R.S.; Dikshit, A.K.; Kumar, R. Assessment of Spatial Ambient Concentration of NH3 and its Health Impact for Mumbai City. Asian J. Atmos. Environ. (AJAE) 2019, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pande, J.N.; Bhatta, N.; Biswas, D.; Pandey, R.M.; Ahluwalia, G.; Siddaramaiah, N.H.; Khilnani, G.C. Outdoor air pollution and emergency room visits at a hospital in Delhi. Indian J. Chest Dis. Allied Sci. 2002, 44, 13–20. [Google Scholar]
  17. Agarwal, R.; Jayaraman, G.; Anand, S.; Marimuthu, P. Assessing respiratory morbidity through pollution status and meteorological conditions for Delhi. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2006, 114, 489–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Maji, S.; Ghosh, S.; Ahmed, S. Association of air quality with respiratory and cardiovascular morbidity rate in Delhi, India. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2018, 28, 471–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pant, P.; Lal, R.M.; Guttikunda, S.K.; Russell, A.G.; Nagpure, A.S.; Ramaswami, A.; Peltier, R.E. Monitoring particulate matter in India: Recent trends and future outlook. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2019, 12, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yadav, R.; Nagori, A.; Mukherjee, A.; Singh, V.; Lodha, R.; Kabra, S.K.; Yadav, G.; Saini, J.K.; Singhal, K.K.; Jat, K.R.; et al. Effects of ambient air pollution on emergency room visits of children for acute respiratory symptoms in Delhi, India. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 45853–45866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Papi, A.; Brightling, C.; Pedersen, S.E.; Reddel, H.K. Asthma. Lancet 2018, 391, 783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zheng, X.-Y.; Ding, H.; Jiang, L.-N.; Chen, S.-W.; Zheng, J.-P.; Qiu, M.; Zhou, Y.-X.; Chen, Q.; Guan, W.-J. Association between Air Pollutants and Asthma Emergency Room Visits and Hospital Admissions in Time Series Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0138146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Hasegawa, K.; Tsugawa, Y.; Brown, D.F.; Camargo, C.A., Jr. Childhood Asthma Hospitalizations in the United States, 2000–2009. J. Pediatr. 2013, 163, 1127–1133.e1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Kuo, C.-Y.; Chan, C.-K.; Wu, C.-Y.; Phan, D.-V.; Chan, C.-L. The Short-Term Effects of Ambient Air Pollutants on Childhood Asthma Hospitalization in Taiwan: A National Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Puranik, S.; Forno, E.; Bush, A.; Celedón, J.C. Predicting severe asthma exacerbations in children. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2017, 195, 854–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Martinez, F.D.; Wright, A.L.; Taussig, L.M.; Holberg, C.J.; Halonen, M.; Morgan, W.J. Asthma and Wheezing in the First Six Years of Life. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995, 332, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Shah, D.; Gupta, P. Pertinent issues in diagnosis and management of wheezing in under-five children at community level. Indian Pediatr. 2010, 47, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Beale, C.A.; Paulot, F.; Randles, C.A.; Wang, R.; Guo, X.; Clarisse, L.; Van Damme, M.; Coheur, P.-F.; Clerbaux, C.; Shephard, M.W.; et al. Large sub-regional differences of ammonia seasonal patterns over India reveal inventory discrepancies. Environ. Res. Lett. 2022, 17, 104006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Central Pollution Control Board. National Ambient Air Quality Status and Trends 2019; NAAQMS/45/2019-2020; Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change: New Delhi, India, 2020; p. 156. Available online: https://cpcb.nic.in/upload/NAAQS_ (accessed on 12 October 2020).
  30. Majumder, S. Socioeconomic status scales: Revised Kuppuswamy, BG Prasad, and Udai Pareekh’s scale updated for 2021. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2021, 10, 3964–3967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. CDC. Overweight and Obesity, Defining Child BMI Categories. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/basics/childhood-defining.html (accessed on 12 April 2023).
  32. Wood, S.N. Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 2011, 73, 3–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Wilkinson, L. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis by WICKHAM, H. Biometrics 2011, 67, 678–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dijkema, M.B.A.; van Strien, R.T.; van der Zee, S.C.; Mallant, S.F.; Fischer, P.; Hoek, G.; Brunekreef, B.; Gehring, U. Spatial variation in nitrogen dioxide concentrations and cardiopulmonary hospital admissions. Environ. Res. 2016, 151, 721–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Grineski, S.E.; Staniswalis, J.G.; Bulathsinhala, P.; Peng, Y.; Gill, T.E. Hospital admissions for asthma and acute bronchitis in El Paso, Texas: Do age, sex, and insurance status modify the effects of dust and low wind events? Environ. Res. 2011, 111, 1148–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. USEPA. Integrated Science Assessment (ISA) for Nitrogen Dioxide—Health Criteria (Final Report, January 2016); EPA/600/R-15/068; United States Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2016; pp. 1–40.
  37. Nagpure, A.S.; Gurjar, B.R.; Kumar, V.; Kumar, P. Estimation of exhaust and non-exhaust gaseous, particulate matter and air toxics emissions from on-road vehicles in Delhi. Atmos. Environ. 2016, 127, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nori-Sarma, A.; Thimmulappa, R.; Venkataraman, G.V.; Warren, J.L.; Berman, J.D.; Whittaker, S.D.; Kulick, E.R.; Wellenius, G.A.; Mahesh, P.A.; Bell, M.L. NO2 exposure and lung function decline in a cohort of adults in Mysore, India. Environ. Res. Commun. 2021, 3, 55001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kakkad, K.M.; Oza, C.; Dutta, P.; Chorsiya, V.; Rajput, P. Linking PM Pollution to the Respiratory Health of Children: A Cross-sectional Study from Ahmedabad City in Western India. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2022, 22, 220038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ueda, K.; Nitta, H.; Odajima, H. The effects of weather, air pollutants, and Asian dust on hospitalization for asthma in Fukuoka. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2010, 15, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Jo, E.-J.; Lee, W.-S.; Jo, H.-Y.; Kim, C.-H.; Eom, J.-S.; Mok, J.-H.; Kim, M.-H.; Lee, K.; Kim, K.-U.; Lee, M.-K.; et al. Effects of particulate matter on respiratory disease and the impact of meteorological factors in Busan, Korea. Respir. Med. 2017, 124, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Huang, S.-K.; Zhang, Q.; Qiu, Z.; Chung, K.F. Mechanistic impact of outdoor air pollution on asthma and allergic diseases. J. Thorac. Dis. 2015, 7, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Venkataraman, C.; Brauer, M.; Tibrewal, K.; Sadavarte, P.; Ma, Q.; Cohen, A.; Sreelekha, C.; Frostad, J.; Klimont, Z.; Martin, R.V.; et al. Source influence on emission pathways and ambient PM2.5 pollution over India (2015–2050). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2018, 18, 8017–8039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Fauzie, A.K.; Venkataramana, G.V. Vehicular particulate emissions in Mysore city. Asian J. Environ. Sci. 2016, 11, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Samoli, E.; Nastos, P.T.; Paliatsos, A.G.; Katsouyanni, K.; Priftis, K.N. Acute effects of air pollution on pediatric asthma exacerbation: Evidence of association and effect modification. Environ. Res. 2011, 111, 418–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Winijkul, E.; Yan, F.; Lu, Z.; Streets, D.G.; Bond, T.C.; Zhao, Y. Size-resolved global emission inventory of primary particulate matter from energy-related combustion sources. Atmos. Environ. 2015, 107, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Holst, G.; Thygesen, M.; Pedersen, C.B.; Peel, R.G.; Brandt, J.; Christensen, J.H.; Bønløkke, J.H.; Hertel, O.; Sigsgaard, T. Ammonia, ammonium, and the risk of asthma: A register-based case–control study in Danish children. Environ. Epidemiol. 2018, 2, e019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sharma, S.B.; Jain, S.; Khirwadkar, P.; Kulkarni, S. The effects of air pollution on the environment and human health. Indian J. Res. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2013, 1, 391–396. [Google Scholar]
  49. Mirabelli, M.C. Exposure to Airborne Emissions from Confined Swine Feeding Operations as a Trigger of Childhood Respiratory Symptoms; ProQuest Dissertations Publishing: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  50. Pavilonis, B.T.; Sanderson, W.T.; Merchant, J.A. Relative exposure to swine animal feeding operations and childhood asthma prevalence in an agricultural cohort. Environ. Res. 2013, 122, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Chakraborty, P.; Chakraborty, A.; Ghosh, D.; Mandal, J.; Biswas, S.; Mukhopadhyay, U.K.; Gupta Bhattacharya, S. Effect of airborne Alternaria conidia, ozone exposure, PM10 and weather on emergency visits for asthma in school-age children in Kolkata city, India. Aerobiologia 2014, 30, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rhomberg, L.R.; Chandalia, J.K.; Long, C.M.; Goodman, J.E. Measurement error in environmental epidemiology and the shape of exposure-response curves. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2011, 41, 651–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Rhomberg, L.R.; Goodman, J.E.; Haber, L.T.; Dourson, M.; Andersen, M.E.; Klaunig, J.E.; Meek, B.; Price, P.S.; McClellan, R.O.; Cohen, S.M. Linear low-dose extrapolation for noncancer heath effects is the exception, not the rule. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2011, 41, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Cox, L.A. Effects of exposure estimation errors on estimated exposure-response relations for PM2.5. Environ. Res. 2018, 164, 636–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Cox, L.A. Nonlinear dose-time-response functions and health-protective exposure limits for inflammation-mediated diseases. Environ. Res. 2020, 182, 109026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mead, J. Dysanapsis in normal lungs assessed by the relationship between maximal flow, static recoil, and vital capacity. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1980, 121, 339–342. [Google Scholar]
  57. Fuseini, H.; Newcomb, D.C. Mechanisms Driving Gender Differences in Asthma. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2017, 17, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Hoo, A.-F.; Dezateux, C.; Hanrahan, J.P.; Cole, T.J.; Tepper, R.S.; Stocks, J. Sex-specific prediction equations for V maxFRC in infancy: A multicenter collaborative study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002, 165, 1084–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Pagtakhan, R.D.; Bjelland, J.C.; Landau, L.I.; Loughlin, G.; Kaltenborn, W.; Seeley, G.; Taussig, L.M. Sex differences in growth patterns of the airways and lung parenchyma in children. J. Appl. Physiol. 1984, 56, 1204–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Chowdhury, S.; Dey, S.; Smith, K.R. Ambient PM 2.5 exposure and expected premature mortality to 2100 in India under climate change scenarios. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Zein, J.G.; Udeh, B.L.; Teague, W.G.; Koroukian, S.M.; Schlitz, N.K.; Bleecker, E.R.; Busse, W.B.; Calhoun, W.J.; Castro, M.; Comhair, S.A.; et al. Impact of Age and Sex on Outcomes and Hospital Cost of Acute Asthma in the United States, 2011–2012. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Opara, N.U.; Hensley, B.M.; Judy, C. Evaluating the Benefits of Viral Respiratory Panel Test in the Reduction of Emergency Department Throughput Time for Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Curēus 2021, 13, e19213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Brotons, P.; Villaronga, M.; Henares, D.; Armero, G.; Launes, C.; Jordan, I.; Muñoz-Almagro, C. Clinical impact of rapid viral respiratory panel testing on pediatric critical care of patients with acute lower respiratory infection. Enfermedades Infecc. Y Microbiol. Clin. 2022, 40, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Thattakkat, K. A clinical study of the benefits and effectiveness of a respiratory viral panel PCR study in children presenting with respiratory tract infections. Br. J. Child Health 2022, 3, 95–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Descriptive statistics.
Table 1. Descriptive statistics.
VariableAllBoysGirlsp Value
N (%)362232 (64.08)130 (35.91)
Mean age ± SD5.34 (±4.66)5.69 (4.85)5.16 (4.47)
Age group, N (%)
<5 years (N = 194)194, (53.59)116 (59.79) 62 (31.95)
≥5 years (N = 161 + 7)168 (46.40)116 (69.04)68 (40.47)
Diagnosis N (%)
Asthma211 (57.34)134 (57.58)77 (56.91)
WALRI151 (42.66)98 (42.42)53 (43.09)
Weight (in kgs), mean (SD)18.07055 (12.5943)17.61 (12.04156)18.94906 (13.59612)
Height (in cm), mean (SD)103.2295 (28.22597)102.2735 (27.19837)105.0516 (30.12417)
BMI, mean (±SD)15.48876 (3.30534)15.48056 (3.408503)15.50438 (3.113445)p = 0.511
BMI (min, max)(9.002058, 27.6601)(10.38781, 27.6601)(9.002058, 27.38558)
BMI group N (%)
Underweight23 (6.4)15 (6.4)23 (6.4)p = 0.70
Normal285 (79.4)189 (80.1)285 (79.2)
Overweight15 (4.2)7 (3.0)15 (4.2)
Obese37 (10.3)25 (10.6)37 (10.3)
Average hospital stays (in days), mean (SD) (>3 days)3.69 (2.74)3.77 (3.10)3.54 (1.88)
Total duration of hospital stays (in days) N (min, max)360 (0, 28)236 (0, 28)124 (0, 10)
No of previous hospital admissions N (min, max)208 (1, 12)137 (1, 12)71 (1, 7)
No of previous hospital admissions within 12 months
N (min, max)		121 (1, 12)82 (1, 4)39 (1, 12)
No of previous hospital admissions within 28 days
N (min, max)		37 (1, 4)24 (1, 2)13 (1, 4)
Socioeconomic status N (%)
Lower36 (11.84)27 (13.30)9 (8.91)
Lower middle76 (25.00)46 (22.66)30 (29.70)
Middle167 (54.93)117 (57.64)50 (49.50)
Upper middle25 (8.22)13 (6.40)12 (11.88)
Family history of Asthma N (%)
Paternal history N (%)41 (11.71)18 (7.86)23 (19.01)
Maternal history N (%)26 (7.43)15 (6.55)11 (9.09)
Sibling history N (%)7 (2.61)4 (2.31)3 (3.16)
Season N (%)
Winter77 (21.39)44 (18.64)33 (26.61)
Summer58 (16.11)38 (16.10)20 (16.13)
Monsoon158 (43.89)112 (47.46)46 (37.10)
Autumn67 (18.61)42 (17.80)25 (20.16)
Note: N = Frequency/number; % means percentage; SD: standard deviation; mean = average; min: minimum; max: maximum; total = total number of hospital admissions from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021.
Table
Table 2. Summarising descriptive variables (mean of air pollution levels and meteorological variables, hospital admissions in Mysore, 2017–2021).
Table 2. Summarising descriptive variables (mean of air pollution levels and meteorological variables, hospital admissions in Mysore, 2017–2021).
VariableMean (SD)PercentileMinMax
25507590
PM2.5 (µgm−3)25.68 (5.35)24.0026.4029.0031.008.0041.40
PM10 (µgm−3)50.37 (8.61)46.0051.0055.0059.0020.0077.00
NO2 (µgm−3)15.72 (2.55)14.0915.1016.6219.7011.2024.20
NH3 (µgm−3)14.42 (2.98)12.6914.1115.6417.039.6238.30
Temperature (max) in Celsius30.91 (2.34)29.0031.0032.0034.0021.0038.00
Humidity (%)73 (26.02)5376.0065.286.317.098.4
Asthma admission (total 362)0.1982 (0.548)000104
Weekdays *N (%)
Monday51 (14.09)000103
Tuesday61 (16.85)000103
Wednesday49 (13.54)000103
Thursday59 (16.30)000104
Friday58 (16.02)000104
Saturday44 (12.15)000103
Sunday40 (11.05)000104
Total362 (100)000104
Month **N (%)
January31 (8.56)000103
February20 (5.52)000102
March25 (6.91)000102
April16 (4.42)000003
May08 (2.21)000002
June17 (4.70)000003
July34 (9.39)000104
August53 (14.64)000103
September60 (16.57)0011.504
October52 (14.36)000104
November25 (6.91)000103
December21 (5.80)000103
Total362 (100)000104
Note: SD: standard deviation; min: minimum; P25: 25th percentile; P75: 75th percentile; Min: minimum; Max: maximum; total = total number of hospital admissions for period 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001.
Table
Table 3. Summary of the GAMs for daily asthma admissions.
Table 3. Summary of the GAMs for daily asthma admissions.
GAM *All Participants *
(N = 362)		Boys *
(N = 232)		Girls *
(N = 130)		Children Less than 5 Years *
(N = 194)		Children More than Equal to 5 Years * (N = 168)
Air Pollutants + s (Time) + Day of Week Categorical + s (Tempmax) + s (Relative Humidity)Edf (p Value); logLIKEdf (p Value); logLIKEdf (p Value); logLIKEdf (p Value); logLIKEdf (p Value); logLIK
NO22.428 (0.0223); −879.8392.483 (0.00814); −651.7841.000 (0.931); −109.8291.000 (0.931); −179.2661.000 (0.740); −145.630
PM2.53.910 (0.0113); −876.8903.844 (0.016); −651.283 1.000 (0.572); −109.671.000 (0.790); −179.2351.000 (0.762); −145.640
PM101.006 (0.0534); −884.7252.049 (0.0271); −655.081.000 (0.916); −109.8281.000 (0.959); −179.2691.000 (0.640); −145.575
NH34.810 (<0.0001); −831.0684.532 (<0.0001); −631.2385.705 (0.00074); −357.643.751 (<0.0001); −553.1864.919 (<0.0001); −466.177
* All estimates adjusted for lag days, weekdays, maximum temperature, and relative humidity. Note: Each of the study variables was used in the generalised additive models (GAMs) with the Poisson link to explore the association between the daily asthma hospitalisation and air pollutants concentration (in µgm−3) as the primary exposure variable. In the GAM analysis, columns represent the estimates of GAM model for daily asthma hospitalisation in children and air pollutant concentrations adjusted for the day of the week, lag days, maximum temperature in degree Fahrenheit, and relative humidity in percentages. Smoothing parameters were time, maximum temperature, and relative humidity. The continuous variables represent PM10—particulate matter of diameter 10 µm or less; PM2.5—particulate matter of diameter 2.5 µm or less; NO2—nitrogen dioxide; NH3—Ammonia; and SO2—sulphur dioxide as µgm−3; and daily asthma admission as counts. The estimates are presented for all participants (children), boys, girls, children less than 5 years old, and children more than or equal to 5 years old from column 2 to 6. The p-values are reported for each of the estimates and the logLINK exponentiates the linear predictors where the higher value presents a better fit.
Table
Table 4. Summary estimates of GLM for daily asthma admissions.
Table 4. Summary estimates of GLM for daily asthma admissions.
GLMAll Participants *
(N = 362)		Boys *
(N = 232)		Girls *
(N = 130)		Children Less than 5 Years *
(N = 194)		Children More than Equal to 5 Years * (N = 168)
Air PollutantsRR (95% CI); p Value; logLIKRR (95% CI); p Value; logLIKRR (95% CI); p Value; logLIKRR (95% CI); p Value; logLIKRR (95% CI); p Value; logLIK
NO2Non-linear
(Refer to Figure S2)		Non-linear0.995 (0.915, 1.082); 0.671; −109.910.956 (0.878, 1.042); 0.314; −135.561.005 (0.912, 1.108); 0.905; −146.23
PM2.5Non-linear
(Refer to Figure S3)		Non-linear0.994 (0.971, 1.017); 0.642; −109.8100.993 (0.969, 1.018); 0.613; −135.960.990 (0.961, 1.019); 0.509; −146.03
PM101.028 (1.013, 1.043); <0.0001; −104.634Non-linear
(Refer to Figure S4)		0.998 (0.977, 1.020); 0.914; −109.9100.999 (0.970, 1.029); 0.988; −136.080.987 (0.952, 1.024); 0.507; −146.02
NH3Non-linear
(Refer to Figure S5)		Non-linearNon-linearNon-linearNon-linear
* Adjusted for lag days, maximum temperature, and relative humidity. Note: Each of the study variables was used in the generalised linear models (GLMs) with the Poisson link to explore the association between the daily asthma hospitalisation and air pollutants concentration (in µgm−3) as the primary exposure variable. In the GLM analysis, columns represent the estimates of GAM model for daily asthma hospitalisation in children and air pollutant concentrations adjusted for the lag days, maximum temperature in degree Fahrenheit, and relative humidity in percentage. The continuous variables represent PM10—particulate matter of diameter 10µm or less; PM2.5—particulate matter of diameter 2.5 µm or less; NO2—nitrogen dioxide; NH3—ammonia; and SO2—sulphur dioxide as µgm−3; and daily asthma admission as counts. The estimates are presented for all participants (children), boys, girls, children less than 5 years old, and children more than or equal to 5 years from column 2 to 6 as RR (Relative Risk). The p values are reported for each of the estimates and the logLIK exponentiates the linear predictors where the higher value present a better fit and p-value < 0.0001 is bold.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Malamardi, S.; Lambert, K.; Siddaiah, J.B.; Erbas, B.; Mahesh, P.A. Effects of Ambient Air Pollutants on Hospital Admissions among Children Due to Asthma and Wheezing-Associated Lower Respiratory Infections in Mysore, India: A Time Series Study. Children 2023, 10, 1322. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10081322

AMA Style

Malamardi S, Lambert K, Siddaiah JB, Erbas B, Mahesh PA. Effects of Ambient Air Pollutants on Hospital Admissions among Children Due to Asthma and Wheezing-Associated Lower Respiratory Infections in Mysore, India: A Time Series Study. Children. 2023; 10(8):1322. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10081322

Chicago/Turabian Style

Malamardi, Sowmya, Katrina Lambert, Jayaraj Biligere Siddaiah, Bircan Erbas, and Padukudru Anand Mahesh. 2023. "Effects of Ambient Air Pollutants on Hospital Admissions among Children Due to Asthma and Wheezing-Associated Lower Respiratory Infections in Mysore, India: A Time Series Study" Children 10, no. 8: 1322. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10081322

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop