Next Article in Journal
Effective Removal of Refractory Pollutants through Cinnamic Acid-Modified Wheat Husk Biochar: Experimental and DFT-Based Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
In Situ Surface Reconstruction of Catalysts for Enhanced Hydrogen Evolution
Previous Article in Journal
Tailorable Formation of Hierarchical Structure Silica (HMS) and Its Application in Hydrogen Production
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preparation of a Novel NiAlO Composite Oxide Catalyst for the Dehydrogenation of Methylcyclohexane
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Catalysts
Volume 12
Issue 9
10.3390/catal12091062
catalysts-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Catalytic Hydrogenation of Nitrocyclohexane with CuCo/SiO2 Catalysts in Gas and Liquid Flow Reactors

by
Emil Kowalewski
1,*,
Krzysztof Matus
2,
Arkadiusz Gajek
1 and
Anna Śrębowata
1,*
1
Institute of Physical Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kasprzaka 44/52, PL-01224 Warsaw, Poland
2
Materials Research Laboratory, Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 18A, PL-44100 Gliwice, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2022, 12(9), 1062; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12091062
Submission received: 12 August 2022 / Revised: 12 September 2022 / Accepted: 15 September 2022 / Published: 17 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Progress in Development of Hydrogenation and Dehydrogenation Catalysts)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane proved to be an attractive alternative source of various chemical compounds: cyclohexanone oxime, cyclohexanone, cyclohexanol, cyclohexylamine and dicyclohexylamine. A growing interest in this reaction has been observed in the last few years. Herein, we present the catalytic performance of Cu/SiO2, Co/SiO2 and CuCo/SiO2 in gas and liquid flow nitrocyclohexane hydrogenation. The analysis of synthesized catalysts morphology (BET, TPR, XRD, TEM) in terms of their catalytic behavior allows us to draw general conclusions and determine the optimal conditions for the production of desired products. Application of the monometallic copper leads to the formation of cyclohexanone as the main product, but with low activity. On the other hand, Co/SiO2 shows high activity but gives cyclohexylamine. Bimetallic system CuCo(3:1)/SiO2 allows for the efficient production of 100% cyclohexanone at 5 bar and 75 °C.

1. Introduction

Catalytic hydrogenation is one of the most widely used reactions in modern production, which found application in the fat industry, petroleum refining processes, production of modern materials, synthesis of pharmaceuticals and many others. Decades of research on hydrogenation catalysts have resulted in the development of many active, selective and stable catalytic systems [1]. A lot of patented solutions are based on noble metals. However, every year, more and more catalysts consisting of non-noble metals have been synthesized, tested and developed [1].
Whereas the hydrogenation of aromatic nitro compounds has been widely studied, the hydrogenation of aliphatic nitro compounds still needs to be investigated more thoroughly [2]. Among them, hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane (NC) seems to be an attractive alternative source of various chemicals: cyclohexanone oxime (essential in the manufacturing of polyamides), cyclohexanol (feedstock in the polymer industry and plasticizers production), cyclohexylamine (a building block for pharmaceuticals), cyclohexanone (a precursor in the production of nylons and resins) and dicyclohexylamine (which found application in the manufacture of antioxidants in rubber and plastics, agrochemicals and corrosion inhibitors). A thorough analysis of research on the catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane shows that this seemingly simple reaction could be very challenging due to the vast number of crucial factors. However, the possibility of obtaining numerous valuable chemicals in one reaction seems to be extremely interesting. Those individuals are produced by multi-step processes at elevated pressure and temperature [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. On the other hand, selective hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane provides the possibility to obtain each of them in a simple one-step process performed under mild conditions [10]. The development of catalytic flow reactors for scientific purposes even increased the applicability of this solution to the chemical industry.
Most of the research concerning the catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane has been focused on noble metal catalysts used in batch conditions [11,12,13,14,15,16]. However, relatively recently, the activity, selectivity and stability of non-noble catalysts in this reaction have been proved by different research groups [17,18,19]. Fangbo et al. [18] demonstrated the activity of Ni-based catalysts in the hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane. On the other hand, Zhang et al. [17] analyzed the activity catalysts containing 15 wt.% of Ni and Fe during batch mode NC hydrogenation at 100 °C and under 10 bar in ethylenediamine as a solvent. They revealed that, depending on the used transition metal, the catalysts were selective to different reaction products. Application of Fe led to the formation mainly cyclohexanone (75% selectivity), Ni gave cyclohexanone oxime as a major product with 59% selectivity [17].
Until now, not a lot of attention has been paid to the nitrocyclohexane hydrogenation in flow mode [19,20,21]. Moreover, only one of these articles demonstrated activity of the non-noble metals (CuZnAl hydrotalcite derived materials) in the liquid phase continuous flow hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane at mild conditions (5 or 10 bar and the temperature range 25–145 °C [19]. Despite the growing interest in this topic observed in the last few years, many essential for this reaction factors still need to be determined.
Therefore, this work is a continuation of our previous research on the use of flow conditions in the hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane with readily available transition metals.
Copper and cobalt-based catalysts proved to be active and selective in the hydrogenation of nitro compounds. Zhang et al. [17] demonstrated that Cu and Co catalysts could be very selective in nitrocyclohexane hydrogenation at 100 °C and under 10 bar in ethylenediamine as a solvent. They showed that Cu catalysts steer this reaction into the formation of cyclohexanone oxime (92% selectivity) and Co into the formation of cyclohexanone (59% selectivity).
The earlier studies concerning the activity of CuCo bimetallic systems in the hydrogenation of CO2 [22] and transformation of biomass-derived compounds: γ-butyrolactone into 1,4-butanediol [23], lauric acid into lauric alcohol [24] or 2-hydroxymethylfurfural into 2,5-dimethylfuran [25] clearly show the beneficial role of the close interaction or proximity of Cu0 and Co0. The coexistence of Cu and Co improved the catalytic performance by increasing the activity with maintaining selectivity toward desired product [26,27,28,29]. Hence, we wondered CuCo-based catalysts’ performance in NC hydrogenation.
Therefore, the main goal of the research was the modification of the catalytic behavior of Cu catalysts by Co addition to increase its activity with the preservation of the selectivity toward desired product. The monometallic and bimetallic catalysts with different Cu:Co ratio were synthesized, characterized and investigated in NC hydrogenation. The firstly reported catalytic results have shown the beneficial role of CuCo formation on their catalytic performance.

2. Results

2.1. N2 Physisorption Results

The nitrogen adsorption performed at 77 K for each catalyst showed satisfactory specific surface area ~240 m2/g and well-developed porosity, with the dominance of mesopores (Table 1). Moreover, the test for support material (SiO2) revealed that the applied synthesis procedure does not significantly affect the surface parameters of SiO2. The similarities in surface parameters between all catalysts eliminate the additional factor in the analysis of the catalytic behavior of tested materials.

2.2. Temperature-Programmed Reduction Studies (H2-TPR)

TPR profiles of the calcined Cu/SiO2, Co/SiO2 and CuCo/SiO2 catalysts are shown in Figure 1. The obtained results are in agreement with the previous observations of Smith et al. [29] for similar materials.
The maximum Cu/SiO2 reduction peak is located at 275 °C, with a distinguished sign of another peak at 233 °C. Unsupported CuO usually reduces directly into metallic Cu in a single step, without forming Cu2O [30,31]. However, multiple peaks during TPR are often observed in the case of supported CuO. Based on the reported data, several possible explanations exist for this phenomenon. Some authors attribute the low-temperature peak to the direct reduction of small particles with low crystallinity into Cu0 directly [32,33]. The other explanation involved the presence of CuO species with various hydrogen availability [19]. On the other hand, the subsequent reduction: CuO → Cu2O → Cu0 should also be considered, especially if the ratio between TPR peaks is almost 1:1 [29]. In the case of the presented results (Figure 1), the first one seems to be the most possible.
The TPR profile for the reduction of Co/SiO2 demonstrates two very-well distinguishable peaks related to sequential reduction: Co3O4 → CoO → Co0 [34,35]. In the presented results, related peaks are located at 320 °C and 384 °C, respectively. According to the literature data, the second step is strongly affected by the interaction with support material [36]. Powerful interaction of cobalt species with SiO2 increases the maximum temperature of reduction. The presence of cobalt silicate may increase the TPR maximum up to 900 °C [35]. Based on the obtained results (Figure 1), there is only little support interaction of Co species with SiO2 in the synthesized Co/SiO2 catalyst.
Each bimetallic catalyst demonstrated a lower reduction temperature than monometallic Cu/SiO2 and Co/SiO2. Only in the case of the catalyst with higher Co concentration (CuCo(1:3)/SiO2) does the presence of a broad area of hydrogen consumption (190–315 °C) indicate several overlapping reduction processes. The other two bimetallic catalysts showed only one reduction peak with a maximum located at ~235 °C. Such a TPR profile is typical for CuCo/SiO2 catalysts [37,38,39]. It could be explained by strong interaction between CuO and Co3O4 [37,39,40] or even a formation of CuxCo3-xO4 phase to explain the promoting effect of Cu on Co reduction [38,39]. In general, the addition of Cu into Co/SiO2 increases the reducibility of cobalt oxides, especially CoO. On the other hand, adding Co into Cu/SiO2 decreases the formation of Cu2O, which is more challenging to reduce [29].

2.3. X-ray Diffraction Results

The XRD patterns obtained for the Cu, Co and CuCo catalysts are shown in Figure 2. Each catalyst demonstrated a diffraction hump between 20 and 25 °C, corresponding to the structure of SiO2.
The activated Cu/SiO2 catalyst’s XRD pattern consisted of three visible diffraction peaks located at 43.3°, 50.5° and 74.3°, associated with Cu(1 1 1), Cu(2 0 0) and Cu(2 0 0). Besides the small signal located at ~36°, there was no evidence of CuO or Cu2O presence in the sample.
The diffraction pattern obtained for the activated Co/SiO2 suggests the presence of only the metallic form of Co. Nevertheless, the existence of highly dispersed on the catalysts’ surface Co3O4 and CoO cannot be excluded. However, thorough studies of the activation process of such catalysts performed by Smith et al. [29] showed similar behavior of the Co/SiO2 catalysts. CoO starts to convert into cubic Co0 phase above 400 °C. The transformation can be completed during a prolonged process at 600 °C [29].
Each bimetallic CuCo/SiO2 catalyst demonstrated entirely different XRD patterns and hence diverse morphology of their active phases. CuCo(1:3) presented only Co0 related diffraction signals. On the other hand, CuCo(3:1) exhibited mainly signals assigned to Cu0, with a small sign of Co0 in the sample. In both cases, slight shifts of Cu and Co peaks were observed relative to the monometallic catalysts. It could suggest the modification of Cu or Co unit cell by other metal. Because copper and cobalt have limited miscibility, it is highly possible that CuCo alloy is formed in a limited amount, while metal present in excess creates a separate crystalline phase. Different XRD profile was observed for CuCo(1:1)/SiO2 in which shifted Cu0 and Co0 signals overlapped. Simultaneously, the intensity of Cu0 signal significantly decreased. Such behavior could be associated with the formation of CuCo alloy or high dispersion of Cu nanoparticles on the SiO2.

2.4. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Results

TEM images and particle size distribution of monometallic Cu/SiO2 and Co/SiO2 are shown in Figure 3. In comparison to the bimetallic catalysts (Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6), both monometallic systems demonstrated smaller metal nanoparticles.
The elemental mapping images, particle size distribution charts and interplanar distances of the bimetallic catalysts are shown in Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6. Each catalyst presents well-dispersed metal nanoparticles consisting of Cu and Co supported on SiO2. The dominance of metal with higher concentration in the sample is noticeable. The increasing Co concentration in CuCo/SiO2 resulted in the growth of formed metal nanoparticles. The average particle size in CuCo(3:1)/SiO2 was equal to 13 nm, with a relatively narrow distribution. Setting up the Cu:Co ratio to 1:1 did not significantly affect the average particle size but broadened the distribution. Finally, the dominance of cobalt in CuCo/SiO2 catalysts meaningfully increased the overall particle size. The measured interplanar distances of nanoparticles in bimetallic systems allowed for determining the presence of CuCo alloy (Cu0.52Co0.48) in all tested catalysts.

2.5. Catalytic Tests Results

2.5.1. Catalytic Hydrogenation of Nitrocyclohexane in Liquid Flow Conditions

Before catalytic experiments, blank tests with support material in all reaction conditions were performed to eliminate the influence of the reaction conditions on catalytic performance. The obtained results proved negligible activity of SiO2 in all tested conditions.
The catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in the liquid phase was performed at various reaction parameters (from 1 to 40 bar and from 50 to 125 °C). The selectivity and activity (expressed as C/Co and marked with ◊) of the tested catalysts are shown in Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11. Both monometallic and bimetallic catalysts demonstrated satisfactory activity and selectivity to desired products.
Cu/SiO2 is generally less active than Co/SiO2 (Figure 7 and Figure 8). The main product of nitrocyclohexane hydrogenation with Cu/SiO2 is cyclohexanone (Figure 7). According to the reaction Scheme 1 , cyclohexanone formation requires less hydrogen. Hence, the selectivity of this catalyst could be influenced by a reduced amount of dissociated hydrogen on the catalyst surface. However, with simultaneous temperature and pressure increases, the activity of Cu/SiO2 also increases. On the other hand, its selectivity varies only slightly, and the formation of a higher amount of cyclohexylamine is observable.
Monometallic Co/SiO2 showed significantly higher activity in nitrocyclohexane hydrogenation (Figure 8) than its copper counterpart. Independently from the applied conditions, this catalyst steers the reaction into the formation of cyclohexylamine. At the temperature and pressure above 10 bar and 100 °C, cyclohexanol was detected as an additional product. No other products of nitrocyclohexane hydrogenation cyclohexyl-cyclohexylidene amine, dicyclohexylamine) were observed.
Each bimetallic catalyst showed a different catalytic performance from the monometallic ones (Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11). However, the influence of each metal seems to be apparent. Regarding the overall catalytic activity, bimetallic systems are much like the more active Co/SiO2. Nevertheless, the selectivity of CuCo/SiO2 catalysts seems to be determined by the copper presence. Cyclohexanone is a dominant product of nitrocyclohexane hydrogenation at lower temperatures and pressures. An increase of the reaction conditions also switches selectivity into the formation of cyclohexylamine, which is especially visible for the samples with higher Co content (CuCo(1:3)/SiO2). However, the formation of other nitrocyclohexane products (cyclohexyl-cyclohexylidene amine, dicyclohexylamine) was not observed.
Detailed analysis of the results obtained at various temperatures and pressures allowed us to determine the best conditions for the production of cyclohexylamine and cyclohexanone. Stability tests with selected catalysts were performed at determined parameters (Figure 12 and Figure 13). The samples were collected at regular intervals. Co/SiO2 allowed cyclohexylamine production at 10 bar and 125 °C, with over 90% selectivity for 5 h without any signs of deactivation. CuCo (3:1)/SiO2 demonstrated similar stability at 5 bar and 75 °C during the formation 100% of cyclohexanone.

2.5.2. Catalytic Hydrogenation of Nitrocyclohexane in Gas Flow Conditions under Atmospheric Pressure

Each catalyst tested in the liquid continuous-flow reactor was also tested in gas flow conditions (Figure 14, Figure 15, Figure 16, Figure 17 and Figure 18). Despite the differences between these two catalytic reactors and different reaction conditions, all the catalysts maintained similar selectivity to specific products.
Monometallic Cu/SiO2 demonstrated negligible activity in the hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane with approximately 60% selectivity to cyclohexanone (Figure 14). On the other hand, Co/SiO2 showed significantly higher conversion (~80%) and steered this reaction into the formation of cyclohexylamine (Figure 15).
The results obtained for bimetallic catalysts are different from monometallic ones. However, the comparative analysis of catalytic performance allowed us to observe some correlation between their activity and the activity of the former ones. As in the case of experiments performed in liquid flow conditions, the lowest conversion among the bimetallic catalysts was demonstrated by CuCo(3:1)/SiO2 (Figure 16). Determination of Cu:Co ratio for 1:1 in CuCo/SiO2 catalysts gave ~50% selectivity to cyclohexylamine and cyclohexanone with 35% conversion (Figure 17). On the other hand, the most active was the CuCo(1:3)/SiO2 with the highest concentration of Co.

2.6. Catalytic Hydrogenation of Nitrocyclohexane–Mechanism

Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane is still an under-researched area. Most of the research groups concerning this process proposed their own mechanisms. All of them were summarized by Kowalewski et al. [10]. In general, the nitrocyclohexane hydrogenation process could be presented as in Scheme 1. However, based on the mechanistic studies of Yao et al. [18], verifying the course of nitrocyclohexane hydrogenation is essential. Hence, the catalytic performance of the selected catalysts was examined at specific reaction conditions (40 bar, 100 °C). The results summarized in Table 2 confirmed that nitrocyclohexane hydrogenation on CuCo catalysts occurs by the pathway presented in Scheme 1.
Catalysts 12 01062 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane [17,20].
Scheme 1. Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane [17,20].
Catalysts 12 01062 sch001

3. Discussion

Despite the high applicability of nitrocyclohexane hydrogenation, the number of available studies is still limited. Nevertheless, a growing interest in this topic has been observed in the last few years [17,18,19]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no study concerning the comparison of the catalytic performance of any catalyst in gas-flow and liquid-flow conditions. Hence, the presented research seems to be unique in this field and may be an inspiration for further investigation.
Most of the research on the catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane is focused on reactions performed in batch reactors [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Moreover, the reaction conditions applied by various research groups are not consistent with each other. Hence, even a comparison of results obtained in the same reactor type could be challenging. Nevertheless, taking into account the concentration of used reactants, the mass of the used catalyst, and the time needed to achieve a similar conversion, a general comparison of catalysts’ performance can be made.
The analysis of the catalytic performance of Cu/SiO2, Co/SiO2 and CuCo/SiO2 catalysts allowed for drawing some conclusions.
The chosen catalyst synthesis method (incipient-wetness impregnation) did not change the support material properties. Hence, the influence of the specific surface area and porosity was not considered in the comparison of catalytic performance of Cu, Co and CuCo in the nitrocyclohexane hydrogenation (Table 1).
In general, despite the well-known activity of copper catalysts in hydrogenation reactions [30] (superior to cobalt catalysts [41]), Cu/SiO2 turned out to be significantly less active in the catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane, both in gas and liquid flow reactors. However, Cu/SiO2 demonstrated unique selectivity to cyclohexanone (Figure 7 and Figure 14), while Zhang et al. [17] showed that Cu/SiO2 in batch reactor steers nitrocyclohexane hydrogenation into the formation of cyclohexanone oxime (92 % selectivity with 74 % conversion). On the other hand, in our previous studies with CuZnAl hydrotalcite-derived materials [19], it was demonstrated that Cu nanoparticles steer this reaction into the formation of cyclohexylamine. However, CuZn nanoparticles could direct nitrocyclohexane hydrogenation into the production of cyclohexanone with a high yield [19]. Hence, the results obtained for Cu/SiO2 (Figure 7 and Figure 14) suggest that, in the case of cyclohexanone as a desirable product, modification of copper nanoparticles should be considered. The experiments with products of nitrocyclohexane hydrogenation on Cu/SiO2 (Table 2) indicated that the high yield to cyclohexanone strongly depends on the dominant presence of cyclohexanone oxime. The simultaneous presence of cyclohexanone oxime and nitrocyclohexane on the catalyst surface allows for the formation of cyclohexylamine and dicyclohexylamine. Therefore, efficient production of cyclohexanone requires a rapid transformation of nitrocyclohexane into cyclohexanone oxime, which limits their coexistence on the catalyst’s surface.
Co/SiO2 catalyst was previously tested in nitrocyclohexane hydrogenation in a batch reactor by Zhang et al. [17], and it turned out to be almost inactive and selective to cyclohexanone. However, Co/SiO2 used in gas and liquid flow reactors steered the nitrocyclohexane hydrogenation into the formation of cyclohexylamine (Figure 8 and Figure 15). The other hydrogenation product–cyclohexanol was also detected at higher pressures and temperatures (Figure 8). Considering the proposed reaction pathway (Scheme 1) and the results obtained at lower temperatures and pressures (Figure 8), the presence of cyclohexanol results from the further hydrogenation of cyclohexanone. Such catalytic behavior confirms the great activity of Co/SiO2. Moreover, the extended experiment showed the high stability of this catalyst in the production of cyclohexylamine (Figure 12).
All bimetallic catalysts are more active than Cu/SiO2 and less active than Co/SiO2 in gas and liquid flow catalytic reactors. Nevertheless, despite the increased activity through the presence of cobalt, their selectivity is determined by copper. The obtained EDS images (Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6) show the coexistence of copper and cobalt species, which indicates the synergistic effect in CuCo/SiO2 catalysts previously observed for CuCo catalysts by Marcos et al. [22] and Gou et al. [24]. Thorough literature analysis suggests limited mutual miscibility of Cu and Co. However, XRD measurements suggest the formation of CuCo alloy to some extent, while the metal present in excess creates a separate crystalline phase. Moreover, the measurement of interplanar distance confirmed the existence of CuCo nanoparticles on the SiO2 surface (Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6). Such bimetallic nanoparticles demonstrated higher activity than Cu, keeping selectivity toward cyclohexanone characteristic for monometallic copper. For example, CuCo(3:1)/SiO2 allows for a very efficient formation of cyclohexanone (100% of the selectivity, 9% conversion) at 75 °C under 5 bar for several hours, without signs of deactivation (Figure 13), while Cu/SiO2 shows 100% selectivity but only 0.2% conversion (Figure 7).

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Catalysts Synthesis

Commercially available SiO2 (Davison 62) was used as a support material in the synthesis of Cu, Co and CuCo catalysts. In the first step, it was washed with deionized water and dried for 24 h at 110 K. In the next step, SiO2 was pre-calcined in air at 723 K for 4 h.
All catalysts were prepared by incipient wetness impregnation using Cu(NO3)2 • 6H2O (Chempur, Piekary Śląskie, Poland) and/or Co(NO3)2 • 6H2O (Chempur, Piekary Śląskie, Poland) as metal precursors. The precursors were impregnated into support material using a rotary beaker with simultaneous heating provided by an infrared lamp for 24 h, until complete evaporation of the solvent.
Afterwards, the catalysts were calcined at 500 °C for 3 h (ramp 3 °C/min). Prior to the catalytic reactions, catalysts were activated in 10 % H2/Ar at conditions determined by TPR measurements.

4.2. Surface Analysis—BET

The porosity and surface area of the catalysts were determined by Micromeritics ASAP 2020, employing the BET (Brunauer-Emmett-Teller) and BJH (Barret-Joyner-Halenda) methods and nitrogen as adsorbate. Measurements were performed at 77 K, and they were preceded by evacuation step—3 h at 573 K.

4.3. Temperature-Programmed Reduction

Temperature programmed reductions of catalytic systems were performed in a glass gas flow system equipped with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD). A sample of the material (0.1 g) was placed on the quartz frit in the quartz reactor, which was heated to 1100 K (ramp 10 K/min) in the stream of 10% H2/Ar.

4.4. X-ray Diffraction (XRD)

X-ray powder diffraction patterns (PXRD) were collected using a PANalytical Empyrean Series 2 diffractometer equipped with a spinner and a silicon zero background holder. Cu-Kα radiation was used with an X-ray tube operating at 40 kV and 40 mA.

4.5. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

TEM experiments were performed on the electron microscope Titan G2 60–300 kV (FEI, Tokio, Japan) equipped with EDAX EDS (energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy) detector. Microscopic studies of the catalysts were performed at an accelerating voltage of the electron beam equal to 300 kV. The sample was prepared by dispersion in pure alcohol using an ultrasonic cleaner; a drop of this suspension was placed on carbon films on copper grids.

4.6. Catalytic Activity Tests

The liquid-phase catalytic hydrogenation was performed using ThalesNano H-Cube Pro continuous-flow micro-reactor with an HPLC pump. Nitrocyclohexane (>95%, TCI) solution in ethanol (99.8% pure from Avantor Performance Materials, Gliwice, Poland) was flown through CatCart®70 cartridge with 0.1 g of a catalyst. The hydrogen was generated in situ via water electrolysis. Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane was conducted with each catalyst over a wide range of temperatures (50–125 °C), in the pressure range from 1 to 40 bar and flow rate of 0.5 mL/min and H2 flow rate 60 mL/min. All of the reaction samples were taken at steady state conditions at regular intervals. Substrate conversion and product formation were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) Bruker 456 GC equipped with FID detector and BP 1 60 × 0.25 × 0.25 column.
The gas-phase catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane under atmospheric pressure was performed in a specially-designed glass gas-flow system equipped with independent H2 and Ar lines. The catalyst (0.1 g) was placed on a quartz frit in a glass reactor. All catalytic experiments were performed at 100 °C in the 10% H2/Ar mixture. Nitrocyclohexane (200 µL/h) was introduced into the reaction mixture via a syringe pump (New Era NE-300). The analysis of the reaction progress was performed by gas chromatograph (HP-5890II, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with switching valve, FID detector and BP1 30 × 0.25 × 0.25 column.

5. Conclusions

The demonstrated results are further evidence of the high potential applicability of the gas and liquid flow nitrocyclohexane hydrogenation for industrial applications. Monometallic and bimetallic catalysts consisting of Cu and Co active phases proved to be active, stable and selective in nitrocyclohexane hydrogenation, both in a gas and liquid continuous-flow reactor. Cu nanoparticles steer nitrocyclohexane hydrogenation into the formation of cyclohexanone, but with low activity in gas and liquid phase. On the other hand, the application of Co nanoparticles leads to the production of cyclohexylamine as the main product. The catalytic performance of bimetallic systems strongly depends on the ratio between Cu and Co. The addition of a small amount of Co into Cu significantly increases catalyst’s activity in comparison to Cu/SiO2 (from 0.2% to 9% conversion at 5 bar and 75 °C). While Co increases the activity of CuCo(3:1)/SiO2 catalyst, Cu has a much more significant effect on its selectivity. Finally, the optimal composition of the metallic phase Cu:Co = 3:1 gave 100% of cyclohexanone at 75 °C under 5 bar, showing very high and stable conversion for several hours. Further addition of Co leads to higher overall activity but affects the selectivity toward the desired product of CuCo(1:1)/SiO2 and CuCo(1:3)/SiO2. For these catalysts, the products of complete hydrogenation were obtained.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.K. and A.Ś.; methodology, E.K., K.M., A.G. and A.Ś.; formal analysis, E.K., K.M., A.G. and A.Ś.; investigation, E.K., A.G. and K.M.; data curation, E.K.; writing—original draft preparation, E.K. and A.Ś.; writing—review and editing, E.K. and A.Ś.; supervision, E.K. and A.Ś.; project administration, E.K. and A.Ś.; funding acquisition, E.K. and A.Ś. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Science Centre, Poland: UMO-2018/31/N/ST5/02555.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stoffels, M.A.; Klauck, F.J.R.; Hamadi, T.; Glorius, F.; Leker, J. Technology Trends of Catalysts in Hydrogenation Reactions: A Patent Landscape Analysis. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2020, 362, 1258–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Saito, Y.; Ishitani, H.; Kobayashi, S. Catalytic Hydrogenation of Aliphatic Nitro Compounds with Polysilane/Bone Charcoal-Supported Palladium Catalysts under Continuous-Flow Conditions. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2016, 5, 1124–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rapp, G.; Fuchs, H.; Thomas, E. Manufacture of Cyclohexanone Oxime. U.S. Patent No. 403,113,9, 26 January 1975. [Google Scholar]
  4. Thomas, D.C.; Adams, J.T. Chromium Amine Complex Catalyzed Oxidation of Cycloc Hydrocarbons to Ketones. U.S. Patent No. 3,404,185, 1 October 1964. [Google Scholar]
  5. Musser, M.T. Cyclohexanol and Cyclohexanone. Ullmann’s Encycl. Ind. Chem. 2011, 11, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Danker, L.J.; Permoda, D. Production of Dicyclohexylamine. U.S. Patent No. 2,571,016, 16 May 1949. [Google Scholar]
  7. Goetz, N.; Jacobs, P.; Hupfer, L.; Toussaint, H.; Reiss, W. Method for producing Cycloaliphatic and/or Aromatic Amines. DE Patent No. DE3045719A1, 4 December 1980. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kuhn, K. Methoden Der Organischen Chemie (Houben-Weyl), 4th ed.; Eugene, M., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1958; Volume 11/1. [Google Scholar]
  9. Poehler, G.; Corr, H.; Friedrichsen, W. Process for Catalytic Hydrogenation. DE Patent No. DE1921467A1, 26 April 1969. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kowalewski, E.; Śrębowata, A. Catalytic Hydrogenation of Nitrocyclohexane as an Alternative Pathway for the Synthesis of Value-Added Products. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Serna, P.; López-Haro, M.; Calvino, J.J.; Corma, A. Selective Hydrogenation of Nitrocyclohexane to Cyclohexanone Oxime with H2 on Decorated Pt Nanoparticles. J. Catal. 2009, 263, 328–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shimizu, K.I.; Yamamoto, T.; Tai, Y.; Satsuma, A. Selective Hydrogenation of Nitrocyclohexane to Cyclohexanone Oxime by Alumina-Supported Gold Cluster Catalysts. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2011, 345, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liao, H.G.; Xiao, Y.J.; Zhang, H.K.; Liu, P.L.; You, K.Y.; Wei, C.; Luo, H. Hydrogenation of Nitrocyclohexane to Cyclohexanone Oxime over Pd/CNT Catalyst under Mild Conditions. Catal. Commun. 2012, 19, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, P.L.; Zhang, H.K.; Liu, S.H.; Yao, Z.J.; Hao, F.; Liao, H.G.; You, K.Y.; Luo, H.A. Palladium Supported Catalysts for Nitrocyclohexane Hydrogenation to Cyclohexanone Oxime with High Selectivity. ChemCatChem 2013, 5, 2932–2938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yan, Y.; Liu, S.; Hao, F.; Liu, P.; Luo, H. Nitrocyclohexane Hydrogenation to Cyclohexanone Oxime over Mesoporous Carbon Supported Pd Catalyst. Catal. Commun. 2014, 50, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, S.; Hao, F.; Liu, P.; Luo, H. The Influences of Preparation Methods on the Structure and Catalytic Performance of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes Supported Palladium Catalysts in Nitrocyclohexane Hydrogenation. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 22863–22868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Q.Q.; Dong, J.; Liu, Y.M.; Cao, Y.; He, H.Y.; Wang, Y.D. An Efficient Noble-Metal-Free Supported Copper Catalyst for Selective Nitrocyclohexane Hydrogenation to Cyclohexanone Oxime. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 2930–2933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Yao, F.; Liu, S.; Cui, H.; Lv, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, P.; Hao, F.; Xiong, W.; Luo, H. Activated Carbon Supported Non-Noble Bimetallic Ni-Based Catalysts for Nitrocyclohexane Hydrogenation to Cyclohexanone Oxime under Mild Conditions. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 3300–3315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kowalewski, E.; Krawczyk, M.; Słowik, G.; Kocik, J.; Pieta, I.S.; Chernyayeva, O.; Lisovytskiy, D.; Matus, K.; Śrębowata, A. Continuous-Flow Hydrogenation of Nitrocyclohexane toward Value-Added Products with CuZnAl Hydrotalcite Derived Materials. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2021, 618, 118134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, X.; Perret, N.; Keane, M.A. Gas Phase Hydrogenation of Nitrocyclohexane over Supported Gold Catalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2013, 467, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kowalewski, E.; Zawadzki, B.; Matus, K.; Nikiforow, K.; Śrębowata, A. Continuous-Flow Hydrogenation over Resin Supported Palladium Catalyst for the Synthesis of Industrially Relevant Chemicals. React. Kinet. Mech. Catal. 2021, 132, 717–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Marcos, F.C.F.; Assaf, J.M.; Assaf, E.M. CuFe and CuCo Supported on Pillared Clay as Catalysts for CO2 Hydrogenation into Value-Added Products in One-Step. Mol. Catal. 2018, 458, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, Z.; Barnett, K.J.; Chada, J.P.; Brentzel, Z.J.; Xu, Z.; Dumesic, J.A.; Huber, G.W. Hydrogenation of γ-Butyrolactone to 1,4-Butanediol over CuCo/TiO2 Bimetallic Catalysts. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 8429–8440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gou, X.; Okejiri, F.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, M.; Liu, J.; Chen, H.; Chen, K.; Lu, X.; Ouyang, P.; Fu, J. Tannin-Derived Bimetallic CuCo/C Catalysts for an Efficient In-Situ Hydrogenation of Lauric Acid in Methanol-Water Media. Fuel Process. Technol. 2020, 205, 106426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hao, P.; Zuo, J.; Tong, W.; Lin, J.; Wang, Q.; Liu, Z. Selective Hydrogenation of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural to 2,5-Dimethylfuran over Popcorn-Like Nitrogen-Doped Carbon-Confined CuCo Bimetallic Catalyst. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bailliard-Letournel, R.M.; Gomez Cobo, A.J.; Mirodatos, C.; Primet, M.; Dalmon, J.A. About the Nature of the Co-Cu Interaction in Co-Based Catalysts for Higher Alcohols Synthesis. Catal. Lett. 1989, 2, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mouaddib, N.; Perrichon, V.; Martin, G.A. Characterization of Copper-Cobalt Catalysts for Alcohol Synthesis from Syngas. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 1994, 118, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chaumette, P.; Courty, P.; Kiennemann, A.; Kieffer, R.; Boujana, S.; Martin, G.A.; Dalmon, J.A.; Meriaudeau, P.; Mirodatos, C.; Hölhein, B.; et al. Evolution of Alcohol Synthesis Catalysts under Syngas. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1994, 33, 1460–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Smith, M.L.; Campos, A.; Spivey, J.J. Reduction Processes in Cu/SiO2, Co/SiO2, and CuCo/SiO2 Catalysts. Catal. Today 2012, 182, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kim, J.Y.; Rodriguez, J.A.; Hanson, J.C.; Frenkel, A.I.; Lee, P.L. Reduction of CuO and Cu2O with H2: H Embedding and Kinetic Effects in the Formation of Suboxides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10684–10692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Rodriguez, J.A.; Kim, J.Y.; Hanson, J.C.; Pérez, M.; Frenkel, A.I. Reduction of CuO in H2: In Situ Time-Resolved XRD Studies. Catal. Lett. 2003, 85, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, Z.; Ban, L.; Meng, P.; Li, H.; Zhao, Y. Ethynylation of Formaldehyde over CuO/SiO2 Catalysts Modified by Mg Species: Effects of the Existential States of Mg Species. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Matsumura, Y.; Ishibe, H. Suppression of CO By-Production in Steam Reforming of Methanol by Addition of Zinc Oxide to Silica-Supported Copper Catalyst. J. Catal. 2009, 268, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Van Steen, E.; Sewell, G.S.; Makhothe, R.A.; Micklethwaite, C.; Manstein, H.; De Lange, M.; O’Connor, C.T. TPR Study on the Preparation of Impregnated Co/SiO2 Catalysts. J. Catal. 1996, 162, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Saib, A.M.; Borgna, A.; van de Loosdrecht, J.; van Berge, P.J.; Geus, J.W.; Niemantsverdriet, J.W. Preparation and Characterisation of Spherical Co/SiO2 Model Catalysts with Well-Defined Nano-Sized Cobalt Crystallites and a Comparison of Their Stability against Oxidation with Water. J. Catal. 2006, 239, 326–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Khodakov, A.Y.; Lynch, J.; Bazin, D.; Rebours, B.; Zanier, N.; Moisson, B.; Chaumette, P. Reducibility of Cobalt Species in Silica-Supported Fischer–Tropsch Catalysts. J. Catal. 1997, 168, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Deng, S.; Chu, W.; Xu, H.; Shi, L.; Huang, L. Effects of Impregnation Sequence on the Microstructure and Performances of Cu-Co Based Catalysts for the Synthesis of Higher Alcohols. J. Nat. Gas Chem. 2008, 17, 369–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cesar, D.V.; Peréz, C.A.; Salim, V.M.M.; Schmal, M. Stability and Selectivity of Bimetallic Cu–Co/SiO2 Catalysts for Cyclohexanol Dehydrogenation. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 1999, 176, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fierro, G.; Lo Jacono, M.; Inversi, M.; Dragone, R.; Porta, P. TPR and XPS Study of Cobalt–Copper Mixed Oxide Catalysts: Evidence of a Strong Co–Cu Interaction. Top. Catal. 2000, 10, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Brands, D.S.; Poels, E.K.; Bliek, A. Ester Hydrogenolysis over Promoted Cu/SiO2 Catalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 1999, 184, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhou, H.; Song, J.; Fan, H.; Zhang, B.; Yang, Y.; Hu, J.; Zhu, Q.; Han, B. Cobalt Catalysts: Very Efficient for Hydrogenation of Biomass-Derived Ethyl Levulinate to Gamma-Valerolactone under Mild Conditions. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 3870–3875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Catalysts 12 01062 g001 550
Figure 1. Temperature-programmed reduction of Cu, Co and CuCo catalysts.
Figure 1. Temperature-programmed reduction of Cu, Co and CuCo catalysts.
Catalysts 12 01062 g001
Catalysts 12 01062 g002 550
Figure 2. XRD results of CuCo/SiO2 catalysts.
Figure 2. XRD results of CuCo/SiO2 catalysts.
Catalysts 12 01062 g002
Catalysts 12 01062 g003 550
Figure 3. TEM images and particle size distribution of Cu/SiO2 and Co/SiO2.
Figure 3. TEM images and particle size distribution of Cu/SiO2 and Co/SiO2.
Catalysts 12 01062 g003
Catalysts 12 01062 g004 550
Figure 4. Interplanar distance, TEM mapping and particle size distribution of CuCo(3:1)/SiO2.
Figure 4. Interplanar distance, TEM mapping and particle size distribution of CuCo(3:1)/SiO2.
Catalysts 12 01062 g004
Catalysts 12 01062 g005 550
Figure 5. Interplanar distance, TEM mapping and particle size distribution of CuCo(1:1)/SiO2.
Figure 5. Interplanar distance, TEM mapping and particle size distribution of CuCo(1:1)/SiO2.
Catalysts 12 01062 g005
Catalysts 12 01062 g006 550
Figure 6. Interplanar distance, TEM mapping and particle size distribution of CuCo(1:3)/SiO2.
Figure 6. Interplanar distance, TEM mapping and particle size distribution of CuCo(1:3)/SiO2.
Catalysts 12 01062 g006
Catalysts 12 01062 g007 550
Figure 7. Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in liquid flow conditions with Cu/SiO2.
Figure 7. Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in liquid flow conditions with Cu/SiO2.
Catalysts 12 01062 g007
Catalysts 12 01062 g008 550
Figure 8. Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in liquid flow conditions with Co/SiO2.
Figure 8. Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in liquid flow conditions with Co/SiO2.
Catalysts 12 01062 g008
Catalysts 12 01062 g009 550
Figure 9. Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in liquid flow conditions with CuCo(3:1)/SiO2.
Figure 9. Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in liquid flow conditions with CuCo(3:1)/SiO2.
Catalysts 12 01062 g009
Catalysts 12 01062 g010 550
Figure 10. Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in liquid flow conditions with CuCo(1:1)/SiO2.
Figure 10. Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in liquid flow conditions with CuCo(1:1)/SiO2.
Catalysts 12 01062 g010
Catalysts 12 01062 g011 550
Figure 11. Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in liquid flow conditions with CuCo(1:3)/SiO2.
Figure 11. Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in liquid flow conditions with CuCo(1:3)/SiO2.
Catalysts 12 01062 g011
Catalysts 12 01062 g012 550
Figure 12. Stability test of Co/SiO2 in catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in liquid flow conditions (10 bar, 125 °C).
Figure 12. Stability test of Co/SiO2 in catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in liquid flow conditions (10 bar, 125 °C).
Catalysts 12 01062 g012
Catalysts 12 01062 g013 550
Figure 13. Stability test of CuCo(3:1)/SiO2 in catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in liquid flow conditions (5 bar, 75 °C).
Figure 13. Stability test of CuCo(3:1)/SiO2 in catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in liquid flow conditions (5 bar, 75 °C).
Catalysts 12 01062 g013
Catalysts 12 01062 g014 550
Figure 14. Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in gas flow conditions with Cu/SiO2.
Figure 14. Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in gas flow conditions with Cu/SiO2.
Catalysts 12 01062 g014
Catalysts 12 01062 g015 550
Figure 15. Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in gas flow conditions with Co/SiO2.
Figure 15. Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in gas flow conditions with Co/SiO2.
Catalysts 12 01062 g015
Catalysts 12 01062 g016 550
Figure 16. Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in gas flow conditions with CuCo(3:1)/SiO2.
Figure 16. Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in gas flow conditions with CuCo(3:1)/SiO2.
Catalysts 12 01062 g016
Catalysts 12 01062 g017 550
Figure 17. Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in gas flow conditions with CuCo(1:1)/SiO2.
Figure 17. Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in gas flow conditions with CuCo(1:1)/SiO2.
Catalysts 12 01062 g017
Catalysts 12 01062 g018 550
Figure 18. Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in gas flow conditions with CuCo(1:3)/SiO2.
Figure 18. Catalytic hydrogenation of nitrocyclohexane in gas flow conditions with CuCo(1:3)/SiO2.
Catalysts 12 01062 g018
Table
Table 1. Cu/SiO2, CuCo/SiO2 and Co/SiO2 physicochemical parameters.
Table 1. Cu/SiO2, CuCo/SiO2 and Co/SiO2 physicochemical parameters.
Parameter\MaterialSiO2Cu/SiO2CuCo(3:1)/SiO2CuCo(1:1)/SiO2CuCo(1:3)/SiO2Co/SiO2
Surface area [m2/g]240 ± 5230 ± 5230 ± 5230 ± 5230 ± 5230 ± 5
Pore volume [cm3/g]1.01.01.01.01.01.0
Average pore diameter [nm]171717171717
Table
Table 2. Cu/SiO2, CuCo/SiO2, and Co/SiO2 physicochemical parameters.
Table 2. Cu/SiO2, CuCo/SiO2, and Co/SiO2 physicochemical parameters.
ReactantNitrocyclohexaneCyclohexanone OximeNitrocyclohexane +
Cyclohexanone Oxime
CatalystProducts
Cu/SiO2Cyclohexylamine
Cyclohexanone		CyclohexanoneCyclohexylamine
Cyclohexanone
Dicyclohexylamine
Co/SiO2Cyclohexylamine
Cyclohexanol		Cyclohexylamine
Cyclohexanone
Dicyclohexylamine		Cyclohexylamine
Cyclohexanone
Dicyclohexylamine
CuCo(1:1)/SiO2Cyclohexylamine
Cyclohexanol		Cyclohexylamine
Cyclohexanone
Cyclohexanol
Dicyclohexylamine		Cyclohexylamine
Cyclohexanone
Dicyclohexylamine
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kowalewski, E.; Matus, K.; Gajek, A.; Śrębowata, A. Catalytic Hydrogenation of Nitrocyclohexane with CuCo/SiO2 Catalysts in Gas and Liquid Flow Reactors. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12091062

AMA Style

Kowalewski E, Matus K, Gajek A, Śrębowata A. Catalytic Hydrogenation of Nitrocyclohexane with CuCo/SiO2 Catalysts in Gas and Liquid Flow Reactors. Catalysts. 2022; 12(9):1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12091062

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kowalewski, Emil, Krzysztof Matus, Arkadiusz Gajek, and Anna Śrębowata. 2022. "Catalytic Hydrogenation of Nitrocyclohexane with CuCo/SiO2 Catalysts in Gas and Liquid Flow Reactors" Catalysts 12, no. 9: 1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12091062

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop