Next Article in Journal
Green Synthesis of 2-Oxazolidinones by an Efficient and Recyclable CuBr/Ionic Liquid System via CO2, Propargylic Alcohols, and 2-Aminoethanols
Previous Article in Journal
Easily Recycled CuMgFe Catalysts Derived from Layered Double Hydroxides for Hydrogenolysis of Glycerol
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Catalysts
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/catal11020230
catalysts-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Carbon Content in Ni-Doped Mo2C Catalysts on CO Hydrogenation to Mixed Alcohol

by
Zhenjiong Hao
1,
Xiaoshen Li
1,
Ye Tian
1,*,
Tong Ding
1,
Guohui Yang
2,
Qingxiang Ma
3,
Noritatsu Tsubaki
2 and
Xingang Li
1,4,*
1
Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin), State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Applied Catalysis Science & Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China
2
Department of Applied Chemistry, School of Engineering, University of Toyama, Gofuku 3190, Toyama 930-8555, Japan
3
State Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency Coal Utilization and Green Chemical Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
4
School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2021, 11(2), 230; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11020230
Submission received: 12 January 2021 / Revised: 24 January 2021 / Accepted: 5 February 2021 / Published: 9 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Catalytic Materials)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Herein, we synthesize the Ni-doped Mo2C catalysts by a one-pot preparation method to illuminate the effect of the number of carbon atoms in Mo2C lattice on CO hydrogenation to mixed alcohol. The Ni doping inhibits the agglomeration of Mo2C crystals into large particles and the surface carbon deposition, which increase the active surface area. In addition, the interaction between Ni and Mo increases the electron cloud density of Mo species and promotes the non-dissociative adsorption and insertion of CO. Especially, our results indicate that with the increase of the nickel content, the number of carbon atoms in Mo2C lattice on the surface of the catalyst shows a volcano type variation. The low carbon content induces the formation of coordination unsaturated molybdenum species which exhibit the higher catalytic activity and mixed alcohol selectivity than other molybdenum species. Among the catalysts, the MC-Ni-1.5 catalyst with Ni/Mo molar ratio of 1.5:8.5, which has the largest amount of coordination unsaturated molybdenum species, shows the highest space-time yield of mixed alcohols, which is three times higher than that of the Mo2C catalyst.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Mixed alcohol can be used not only as clean fuels to replace fossil energy but also as solvents, intermediates of chemical raw materials and gasoline additives [1,2,3,4]. Considering energy utilization and environmental protection, directly producing mixed alcohol from syngas can realize clean and efficient utilization of coal resources [5,6].
Four kinds of catalysts are commonly used in CO hydrogenation to mixed alcohol: Rh-based catalysts [7,8,9,10], Mo-based catalysts [11,12,13,14], modified Fischer–Tropsch synthesis catalysts [15,16,17,18] and modified methanol synthesis catalysts [19,20]. Molybdenum carbide catalysts are widely used in CO or CO2 hydrogenation to mixed alcohol [21,22,23], water gas shift [24,25], methanol steam reforming [26,27,28], methane dry reforming [29] and so on. At present, the research results show that molybdenum carbide catalysts have excellent carbon deposition resistance and sulfur resistance [30]. However, CO hydrogenation to mixed alcohol is often accompanied by side reactions such as Fischer–Tropsch synthesis to hydrocarbon and water gas shift. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the selectivity of alcohol by catalyst modification [31,32,33,34,35,36].
Some researchers found that the performance of the molybdenum carbide catalysts for CO hydrogenation to mixed alcohol could be improved by transition metal modification [37,38,39]. Two main reasons are considered to improve the performance of the catalyst. The new formed mixed carbide of metal and Mo, such as Ni6Mo6C [40] and Co3Mo3C [41], might be active sites for alcohol synthesis. The other reason is that the metal–support interaction balances dissociative adsorption and molecular adsorption of CO [42] and further promotes formation of alcohol. However, due to the complexity of the reaction, there is not enough evidence to confirm these views, and the reason for improvement of catalyst performance is still unclear. To identify the factors affecting the catalyst performance for CO hydrogenation to mixed alcohol is still a great challenge.
Defects often play an important role in catalytic reactions [43,44,45]. Some researchers found that there are many molybdenum and carbon defects in molybdenum carbide [43,45,46,47], which might induce electronic and structural changes [48]. However, at present, the effect of these defects on the catalytic performance for CO hydrogenation is still unclear. Although these defects are still difficult to characterize, they are obviously related to the number of carbon atoms in the crystal lattice. Therefore, the effect of defects can be studied by studying carbon content in molybdenum carbide, which will be helpful for rational design of high-performance molybdenum carbide catalyst.
In this work, the Ni and Mo mixed oxide precursors were prepared by a one-pot method, and the Ni-doped molybdenum carbide catalysts were synthesized by the carbonization of the precursors. In order to avoid the formation of local hot spots on the catalyst, which will lower the selectivity of alcohol, we adopted slurry bed reactor to evaluate the catalytic performance of the catalysts for CO hydrogenation to mixed alcohol [49,50]. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), N2 physical adsorption and thermogravimetry (TG) were used to investigate the structure–activity relationship of the catalyst in the reaction system. Especially, the effect of the number of carbon atoms in molybdenum carbide lattice on the catalytic performance was discussed.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Physical Properties of the Catalysts

Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of the catalysts. The diffraction peaks at 2θ = 34.4, 38.0, 39.5, 52.3, 61.7, 69.7 and 74.9° belong to β-Mo2C phase (PDF#72-1683) [28]. For the MC catalyst, only the diffraction peaks of β-Mo2C phase were detected. For the MC-Ni-X catalysts, besides the β-Mo2C phase, a new diffraction peak appeared at 2θ = 44.4°. It can be attributed to n-diamond type carbon phase (PDF#43-1104). No diffraction peak of Ni species is observed in Figure 1, indicating that Ni species are highly dispersed in the catalysts. The enlarged XRD patterns (Figure 1B) show that with the increase of the nickel content, the diffraction peak at 2θ of 39.5° gradually shifts to higher angles. It indicates that Ni2+ cations with smaller ionic radius than Mo2+ cations are doped into the molybdenum carbide lattice, which makes the crystal plane spacing smaller [51]. Compared with the MC catalyst, the diffraction peak intensity of the β-Mo2C phase of the MC-Ni-X catalysts increases sharply. It suggests that the crystallinity of β-Mo2C crystals in the Ni-doped catalysts significantly increases. The average size of β-Mo2C crystals was calculated by Scherrer formula, as listed in Table 1. The results show that the size of β-Mo2C crystal in the MC-Ni-X catalysts is about twice larger than that of the MC catalyst.
Figure 2 shows the HRTEM images of the catalysts. We observed the (121), (200) and (021) planes of Mo2C in MC catalyst, but only observed (121) plane in Ni-doping catalysts. Figure 2a shows that some carbon is deposited on the surface of the MC catalyst, and the amount of carbon deposition on the surface of the MC-Ni-X catalysts is significantly decreased by Ni doping. No Ni-related crystal is observed in the TEM images of the MC-Ni-X catalysts, indicating that Ni atoms are doped in Mo2C, which is consistent with the XRD results.
Figure 3 shows the SEM images of the catalysts. The particles of the MC catalyst in Figure 3a present the irregular large lamellar structure, and most of them are about 1 μm in diameter and 100–200 nm in thickness. After the Ni doping, the particle size of the catalyst in Figure 3b–d significantly decreases, and most of the particles are less than 100 nm. Many stacking pore structures are formed in the MC-Ni-X catalysts. However, the XRD and TEM results show that the crystal size of the MC catalyst is smaller than that of the MC-Ni-X catalysts. Combining the results of XRD and SEM, we believe that small crystals in the MC catalyst finally agglomerate into large particles. Nevertheless, the Ni doping significantly inhibits the agglomeration of the Mo2C crystal [40] which is conducive to increasing the active surface area and further promoting the catalytic performance.
Table 1 gives the specific surface area calculated from the nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms. The specific surface area of the MC-Ni-X catalysts is about 3.0 m2 g−1, which is only one sixth of that of the MC catalyst (17.5 m2 g−1). The isotherm of the MC catalyst (Figure S1 in Supplementary Materials) is similar to that of amorphous carbon [52,53]. We infer that the larger specific surface area of the MC catalyst is due to more carbon deposition on it than that on the MC-Ni-X catalysts.

2.2. Catalytic Performances

Table 2 provides the activity of the catalysts and the selectivity of mixed alcohol. The selectivity of mixed alcohol over the MC-Ni-X catalysts is significantly higher than that over the MC catalyst. It demonstrates that the Ni doping of Mo2C can promote the formation of mixed alcohol products. For the MC-Ni-X catalysts, with the increase of the Ni content, the CO conversion decreases, while the selectivity of mixed alcohol increases. The space-time yield of mixed alcohol over the MC-Ni-1.5 catalyst is the highest among the catalysts. Moreover, at the similar catalytic activity, the reaction temperature of the MC-Ni-1.5 catalyst decreases by more than 70 °C compared with the reported molybdenum carbide-based catalysts [8,37,42,54] (Table 3). It is probably because the reaction environment of the slurry bed reactor is significantly different from that of the fixed bed one [49]. We also calculated the rs (CO conversion rate per unit specific surface area) of each catalyst, and the results are given in Table 2. It can be seen from the table that the rs of the MC catalyst is much smaller than that of the Ni-doped catalysts.

2.3. Surface Properties of the Catalysts

Figure 4 shows the Mo 3d XPS spectra of the catalyst. There are four binding energy peaks in the Mo 3d5/2 region of the MC catalyst. The peaks at 228.5, 229.1, 231.3 and 232.8 eV are assigned to Mo2+, Mo4+, Mo5+ and Mo6+, respectively [55,56]. The MC-Ni-X catalysts have a new binding energy peak at 227.0 eV, which belongs to Mo0. Table 4 lists the relative contents of various valence Mo species on the catalyst surface calculated according to the XPS peak area. Compared with the MC catalyst, the peak position of Mo2+ on the MC-Ni-X catalysts shifted about 0.2 eV towards lower binding energy. It indicates that there is partial electron transfer from Ni to Mo, which increases the electron cloud density of Mo species in the catalyst. It is beneficial to non-dissociative adsorption and insertion of CO to produce mixed alcohol [40,42].
It has been proved that the molybdenum species in the Mo2C bulk are Mo2+ [56]. In addition, there exists some low valence molybdenum species (Moδ+, 0 < δ < 2) on the Mo2C surface under synthesis and reaction conditions because the Mo2C catalyst is synthesized in a strong reduction atmosphere of methane and hydrogen at 700 °C. After passivation, the surface of the catalyst was partially oxidized, so the higher valence molybdenum species appear in the ex-situ XPS results, including Mo4+, Mo5+ and Mo6+.
Figure 5 shows the schematic diagram of the surface states of the catalysts. The first case is the formation of Mo0 on the surface due to the excessive reduction in the process of carbonization. The second and third case are the formation of the carbon defects around the molybdenum atoms and the molybdenum defects around the carbon atoms, respectively.
The surface Mo0 species are more easily oxidized than other Mo species in Figure 5. Thus, we assigned Mo6+ species in Figure 4 to the oxidation of Mo0 during passivation. The XPS results show that the Mo6+ species on the surface of the MC-Ni-X catalysts is only 1/3 to 1/5 to that of the MC catalyst. The activity results suggest that the Mo0 species is not the active site of the catalyst, since the MC-Ni-X catalysts have higher activity than the MC catalyst.
Similarly, Mo species near carbon defects is readily oxidized than stoichiometric Mo2C. Thus, we assume that Mo4+ and Mo5+ species in Figure 4 are originated from Mo species around carbon defects. The activity results show the catalyst with higher Mo4+ and Mo5+ content of has higher space-time yield of mixed alcohol. It indicates that these Mo species have higher activity for the synthesis of mixed alcohol than other Mo species.

2.4. TG Analysis

Figure 6 gives the TG and derivative thermogravimetry (DTG) curves of the catalysts. The DTG curve of the MC catalyst can be divided into five temperature ranges, which are marked as stage A, B, C, D and E. In order to determine the oxidation process corresponding to each temperature range, the samples obtained by oxidizing the MC catalyst at different temperatures (MC-T) were characterized by XRD.
Figure 7 shows the XRD patterns of these samples. The selected oxidation temperature points were determined according to the DTG curve (Figure S2 in Supplementary Materials) of the MC catalyst with a slow heating rate (1 °C min−1) to ensure that the selected temperature points are more illustrative. The MC-270 and MC-305 samples were further characterized by XPS to determine the surface species.
The weight loss below 250 °C can be attributed to the removal of adsorbed impurities on the catalyst surface. The MC-270 sample corresponds to stage B of the DTG curve. According to the XRD results (Figure 7), the composition of the MC-270 sample is similar to the MC catalyst, which exists as the β-Mo2C phase (PDF#72-1683). However, the XPS results (Figure S3 in Supplementary Materials) show that the surface of the MC-270 sample is mainly composed of Mo6+ and Mo5+, indicating that the catalyst surface has been oxidized to molybdenum oxide. Therefore, we attribute the weight gain in stage B to the oxidation of surface Mo2C. Since the oxidation temperature of stage B is relatively low, the carbon deposited on the surface has not been oxidized, so it can reflect the number of carbon atoms in the surface molybdenum carbide lattice.
The MC-305 sample corresponds to stage C of the DTG curve. According to the XRD results (Figure 7), the MC-305 sample still mainly exists as Mo2C. At the same time, a very weak peak belonging to MoO3 phase (PDF#01-0706) appeared at 2θ of 27.2°. We attribute it to the oxidation of small Mo2C particles highly dispersed on the surface of large catalyst particles. The MC-450 and MC-550 sample correspond to stage D and E of the DTG curve, respectively. The XRD patterns of the two samples agree well with the MoO3 phase (PDF#01-0706). The XRD peak intensity of the MC-550 sample is significantly stronger than that of the MC-450 sample. The weight gain at the two stages can be attributed to the oxidation of the bulk Mo2C to MoO3. For these two stages, the product is the same, but the DTG curve shows two peaks. We speculate that the rate control step of the oxidation process has changed. Stage D is the oxidation of the outer Mo2C. Stage E is the oxidation of the internal Mo2C, and in this stage, the rate control step of oxidation is that oxygen enters from outside to inside of crystals.
The DTG curves of the MC-Ni-X catalysts are similar to that of the MC catalyst, but the boundary between the stage D and E is not obvious, probably due to the smaller particle size of the former catalysts than that of the latter one.
According to the TG curves, the amount of weight gain at different stages was calculated. The weight gain of stage B corresponds to the number of carbon atoms in the surface molybdenum carbide lattice of the catalyst, and the total weight gain of stage C, D and E corresponds to the bulk carbon content of the catalyst. The less weight gain indicates the more carbon content. Figure 8 shows the surface, bulk phase and total weight gain of the catalysts. With the increase of the nickel content, the weight gain shows a volcano type variation, indicating that the surface carbon content obeys the similar tendency, which is consistent with the trend of surface Mo4+ and Mo5+ contents and the space-time yield of mixed alcohol. This demonstrates that the number of carbon atoms in the surface molybdenum carbide lattice may be the key factors affecting the synthesis of mixed alcohol.
Table 1 provides the molar ratio of C and Mo (C/Mo) in the catalyst calculated from the TG results. The C/Mo ratios of all the catalysts exceed 0.5, which is the C/Mo theoretical value of Mo2C. It may be due to the fact that we assume the weight decrease of stage A only to desorption during TG analysis. However, a small amount of surface molybdenum species may be oxidized therein, which makes us overestimate the carbon content in the catalyst. On the other hand, the higher C/Mo ratio than 0.5 can also be attributed to carbon deposition on the catalyst surface.
The C/Mo ratio of the MC catalyst is 1.4 times higher than that of the MC-Ni-X catalyst. The Ni doping significantly decreases the amount of carbon on the surface and in the bulk of the catalyst during the carbonization of the precursor. It can accordingly reduce the numbers of carbon atoms in the molybdenum carbide lattice and active sites exposed on the catalyst surface. This inevitably promotes the activity of the Ni-doped catalysts for CO hydrogenation.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Catalysts Preparations

Typically, the catalyst precursors were prepared by a one-pot method. In a mixed solvent of deionized water and ethanol, 0.1 mol of citric acid (C6H8O7) was dissolved. To the citric acid solution was added 0.1 mol (the total amount of Ni and Mo atoms) of Ni(NO3)2·6H2O and (NH4)3Mo7O24·4H2O according to the molar ratio of Ni:Mo = X:(10-X), (X = 1, 1.5, 2). The suspension was stirred until Ni(NO3)2 and (NH4)3Mo7O24 were completely dissolved with addition of ammonia to get a stable pH value of 3 and then evaporated in oil bath at 120 °C for 4 h. Then, it was dried overnight in a constant temperature oven at 100 °C for 12 h. The precursor was obtained by calcining the solid powder in a muffle furnace at 500 °C for 3 h.
The precursors were carbonized to obtain the Ni-doped molybdenum carbide catalysts in a tube furnace in 20% CH4/H2 flow (100 mL min−1). Precursor (0.69 g) was heated from room temperature to 700 °C and maintained for 2 h. The obtained catalyst was cooled to 40 °C naturally. For comparison, molybdenum carbide catalyst was also prepared. The preparation process was consistent with the above process except the absence of nickel. For convenience, the Ni-doped molybdenum carbide catalyst was named as MC-Ni-X, (X = 1, 1.5, 2), and the prepared Mo2C catalyst was named as MC.
In order to investigate the carbonization of the precursor, several samples were prepared by oxidizing the MC catalyst at different temperatures. MC catalyst (80 mg) was heated to the specified temperature of T in air flow (100 mL min−1) at a heating rate of 1 °C min−1, and kept at temperature T for 20 min. The resulting sample was named as MC-T.

3.2. Catalysts Characterization

Before the catalyst characterization, all catalysts were added to dioxane for passivation under the protection of CH4/H2.
The XRD test was carried out on a D8-focus X-ray diffractometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) with the emission source of Cu Kα (λ = 0.15418 nm). The nitrogen physical adsorption test was carried out on a QuadraSorb SI physical adsorption instrument (Quantachrome Instruments, Boynton Beach, FL, USA). The SEM images of the catalysts were taken on a Hitachi S-4800 scanning electron microscope (Hitachi S-4800, Tokyo, Japan). The high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM) images of the catalyst were obtained on a JEOL-JEM-2100F electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). The XPS experiments were conducted on A K-Alpha+ X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Walham, MA, USA). Al Kα was used as X-ray source.
Thermogravimetric analysis was performed on a STA7300 thermogravimetric analyzer. The catalyst was heated to 700 °C at the heating rate of 10 °C min−1 in air flow (100 mL min−1). Based on the thermogravimetric results, the molar ratio of C to Mo (C/Mo) was calculated by the following equation:
x = m2/[MMo + pMNi + (p + 3)MO]
y = px
z = (m1 − xMMo − yMNi)/MC
q = z/y
where x, y and z are the molar quantities of Mo, Ni and C, respectively. p and q are Ni/Mo and C/Mo molar ratio, respectively. m1 is the mass of the catalyst after removing the adsorbed impurities at the temperature of 200–250 °C. m2 is the total mass of MoO3 and NiO obtained by complete oxidation of Mo and Ni species in the catalyst at 600–650 °C. MMo, MNi, MO and MC are the relative atomic mass of Mo, Ni, O and C, respectively.
The ratios of the surface, bulk phase and total weight gain of the catalysts to the total weight of MoO3 (mMoO3) obtained by the complete oxidation of the catalysts were also calculated from the TG analysis results.

3.3. Activity Measurement

CO hydrogenation experiments were carried out in a micro slurry bed reactor. Dioxane was used as the reaction solvent and 2-butanol was used to absorb the liquid products in a cold trap. Catalysts (0.69 g) was added to the slurry bed reactor in the protection of synthesis atmosphere. The gas flow rate was 20 mL min−1. The gas composition was CO (30%), CO2 (5%), H2 (62%) and Ar (3%). The reaction pressure was 5 MPa, and the reaction temperature was 180 °C. The gas chromatograph (GC-9060) produced by Shanghai Ruimin company was used for on-line detection of tail gas. The organic components were detected by a flame ionization detector (FID), and inorganic components were detected by a thermal conductivity detector (TCD). The liquid products were quantitatively detected by a gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GCMS-QP2010) produced by Shimadzu Company (Kyoto, Japan).
The conversion, selectivity and space-time yield of mixed alcohol (STYROH) were calculated by the following equations:
XCO = (nin − nout)/nin × 100%
Si = mi × ni/[∑(mHC×nHC) + ∑(mROH × nROH)] × 100%
STYROH = MROH/(Trec × mcat)
where XCO is the conversion of CO, nin and nout are the molar flow rates of CO in the inlet and outlet gas, respectively. Si is the selectivity of product i, and mi and ni are the number of carbon atoms and moles of product i, respectively. nHC and nROH are the mole numbers of hydrocarbons and alcohols in the product, respectively. mHC and mROH are the corresponding carbon atom numbers of hydrocarbons and alcohols, respectively. MROH is the mass of mixed alcohol, Trec is the reaction time, mcat is the mass of the catalyst, respectively.

4. Conclusions

In this work, the catalyst precursors were prepared by a one-pot method and then carbonized to obtain the Ni-doped Mo2C catalysts. With the protection of synthesis atmosphere, the catalyst was transferred to a slurry bed reactor to test the activity of CO hydrogenation to mixed alcohol. The Ni doping promotes not only the CO hydrogenation activity but also the selectivity of mixed alcohol by more than 20% compared with Mo2C. The SEM, TEM and TG results show that the Ni doping inhibits the agglomeration of Mo2C crystals and the surface carbon deposition to increase the active surface area. The XPS and TG results show that the Ni doping decreases the number of carbon atoms in the molybdenum carbide lattice on the catalyst surface to simultaneously form coordination unsaturated surface Mo species, which is more active for CO hydrogenation. In addition, we discover the electron transfer from Ni to Mo, which increases the electron cloud density of Mo species, improving CO non-dissociation adsorption and insertion to produce mixed alcohol products.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/11/2/230/s1. Figure S1: N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of the catalysts. (a) MC; (b). MC-Ni-1; (c) MC-Ni-1.5; (d) MC-Ni-2. Figure S2: TG curves of MC with the heating rate of 1 °C min-1 in air. 270, 305, 450 and 550 °C are chosen to represent stage B, C, D and E, respectively. Figure S3: Mo 3d XPS spectra of (a) MC-270 and (b) MC-305.

Author Contributions

Z.H., investigation, writing—original draft; Y.T., investigation, writing—review and editing, supervision; X.L.(Xiaoshen Li), investigation, methodology; X.L.(Xingang Li), funding acquisition, writing—review and editing, project administration, resources, supervision; T.D., resources; G.Y., methodology; Q.M., methodology; N.T., resources, methodology. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21676182), the Program for Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities of China (No. BP0618007), and State Key Laboratory of High-efficiency Utilization of Coal and Green Chemical Engineering (2020-KF-26).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

The authors greatly acknowledge the support by the Large Instrument Center of the School of Chemical Engineering, Tianjin University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fang, K.; Li, D.; Lin, M.; Xiang, M.; Wei, W.; Sun, Y. A Short Review of Heterogeneous Catalytic Process for Mixed Alcohols Synthesis via Syngas. Catal. Today 2009, 147, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Deng, X.; Liu, Y.-J.; Huang, W. Higher Alcohols Synthesis from Syngas over Lanthanum-promoted CuZnAl Catalyst. J. Energ. Chem. 2018, 27, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Subramanian, N.D.; Balaji, G.; Kumar, C.S.S.R.; Spivey, J.J. Development of Cobalt–copper Nanoparticles as Catalysts for Higher Alcohol Synthesis from Syngas. Catal. Today 2009, 147, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yüksel, F.; Yüksel, B. The Use of Ethanol–gasoline Blend as a Fuel in an SI Engine. Renew. Energ. 2004, 29, 1181–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Luk, H.T.; Mondelli, C.; Ferre, D.C.; Stewart, J.A.; Perez-Ramirez, J. Status and Prospects in Higher Alcohols Synthesis from Syngas. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 1358–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bao, J.; Yang, G.; Yoneyama, Y.; Tsubaki, N. Significant Advances in C1 Catalysis: Highly Efficient Catalysts and Catalytic Reactions. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 3026–3053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, Y.; Göeltl, F.; Ro, I.; Ball, M.R.; Sener, C.; Aragão, I.B.; Zanchet, D.; Huber, G.W.; Mavrikakis, M.; Dumesic, J.A. Synthesis Gas Conversion over Rh-Based Catalysts Promoted by Fe and Mn. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 4550–4563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, L.; Ball, M.R.; Liu, Y.; Kuech, T.F.; Huber, G.W.; Mavrikakis, M.; Hermans, I.; Dumesic, J.A. Synthesis Gas Conversion over Rh/Mo Catalysts Prepared by Atomic Layer Deposition. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 1810–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Schwartz, V.; Campos, A.; Egbebi, A.; Spivey, J.J.; Overbury, S.H. EXAFS and FT-IR Characterization of Mn and Li Promoted Titania-Supported Rh Catalysts for CO Hydrogenation. ACS Catal. 2011, 1, 1298–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yu, J.; Yu, J.; Shi, Z.; Guo, Q.; Xiao, X.; Mao, H.; Mao, D. The Effects of the Nature of TiO2 Supports on the Catalytic Performance of Rh–Mn/TiO2 Catalysts in the Synthesis of C2 Oxygenates from Syngas. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 3675–3685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Morrill, M.R.; Thao, N.T.; Shou, H.; Davis, R.J.; Barton, D.G.; Ferrari, D.; Agrawal, P.K.; Jones, C.W. Origins of Unusual Alcohol Selectivities over Mixed MgAl Oxide-Supported K/MoS2 Catalysts for Higher Alcohol Synthesis from Syngas. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 1665–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Christensen, J.M.; Duchstein, L.D.L.; Wagner, J.B.; Jensen, P.A.; Temel, B.; Jensen, A.D. Catalytic Conversion of Syngas into Higher Alcohols over Carbide Catalysts. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 4161–4172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, X.; Luan, X.; Dai, X.; Ren, Z.; Cui, M.; Zhao, H.; Nie, F.; Huang, X. Enhanced Higher Alcohol Synthesis from CO Hydrogenation on Zn-Modified MgAl-Mixed Oxide Supported KNiMoS-Based Catalysts. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 1413–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tominaga, H.; Aoki, Y.; Nagai, M. Hydrogenation of CO on Molybdenum and Cobalt Molybdenum Carbides. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2012, 423–424, 192–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pei, Y.-P.; Liu, J.-X.; Zhao, Y.-H.; Ding, Y.-J.; Liu, T.; Dong, W.-D.; Zhu, H.-J.; Su, H.-Y.; Yan, L.; Li, J.-L.; et al. High Alcohols Synthesis via Fischer–Tropsch Reaction at Cobalt Metal/Carbide Interface. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 3620–3624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, Y.; Lin, T.; Qi, X.; Yu, F.; An, Y.; Li, Z.; Dai, Y.; Zhong, L.; Wang, H.; Sun, Y. Direct Synthesis of Long-chain Alcohols from Syngas over CoMn Catalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2018, 549, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Prieto, G.; Beijer, S.; Smith, M.L.; He, M.; Au, Y.; Wang, Z.; Bruce, D.A.; de Jong, K.P.; Spivey, J.J.; de Jongh, P.E. Design and Synthesis of Copper-cobalt Catalysts for the Selective Conversion of Synthesis Gas to Ethanol and Higher Alcohols. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Eng. 2014, 53, 6397–6401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Du, H.; Zhu, H.; Liu, T.; Zhao, Z.; Chen, X.; Dong, W.; Lu, W.; Luo, W.; Ding, Y. Higher Alcohols Synthesis via CO Hydrogenation on Fe-promoted Co/AC Catalysts. Catal. Today 2017, 281, 549–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Su, J.; Zhang, Z.; Fu, D.; Liu, D.; Xu, X.-C.; Shi, B.; Wang, X.; Si, R.; Jiang, Z.; Xu, J.; et al. Higher Alcohols Synthesis from Syngas over CoCu/SiO2 Catalysts: Dynamic Structure and the Role of Cu. J. Catal. 2016, 336, 94–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sun, J.; Cai, Q.; Wan, Y.; Wan, S.; Wang, L.; Lin, J.; Mei, D.; Wang, Y. Promotional Effects of Cesium Promoter on Higher Alcohol Synthesis from Syngas over Cesium-Promoted Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 Catalysts. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 5771–5785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chai, S.-H.; Schwartz, V.; Howe, J.Y.; Wang, X.; Kidder, M.; Overbury, S.H.; Dai, S.; Jiang, D.-e. Graphitic Mesoporous Carbon-supported Molybdenum Carbides for Catalytic Hydrogenation of Carbon Monoxide to Mixed Alcohols. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2013, 170, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, Y.; Choi, S.; Thompson, L.T. Low-Temperature CO2 Hydrogenation to Liquid Products via a Heterogeneous Cascade Catalytic System. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 1717–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, Y.; Choi, S.; Thompson, L.T. Low Temperature CO2 Hydrogenation to Alcohols and Hydrocarbons over Mo2C Supported Metal Catalysts. J. Catal. 2016, 343, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Sabnis, K.D.; Cui, Y.; Akatay, M.C.; Shekhar, M.; Lee, W.-S.; Miller, J.T.; Delgass, W.N.; Ribeiro, F.H. Water–gas Shift Catalysis over Transition Metals Supported on Molybdenum Carbide. J. Catal. 2015, 331, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Schweitzer, N.M.; Schaidle, J.A.; Ezekoye, O.K.; Pan, X.; Linic, S.; Thompson, L.T. High Activity Carbide Supported Catalysts for Water Gas Shift. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 2378–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lin, L.; Zhou, W.; Gao, R.; Yao, S.; Zhang, X.; Xu, W.; Zheng, S.; Jiang, Z.; Yu, Q.; Li, Y.W.; et al. Low-temperature hydrogen production from water and methanol using Pt/α-MoC catalysts. Nature 2017, 544, 80–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cai, F.; Ibrahim, J.J.; Fu, Y.; Kong, W.; Zhang, J.; Sun, Y. Low-temperature Hydrogen Production from Methanol Steam Reforming on Zn-modified Pt/MoC Catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ma, Y.; Guan, G.; Hao, X.; Zuo, Z.; Huang, W.; Phanthong, P.; Kusakabe, K.; Abudula, A. Highly-efficient Steam Reforming of Methanol over Copper Modified Molybdenum Carbide. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 44175–44184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shi, C.; Zhang, A.; Li, X.; Zhang, S.; Zhu, A.; Ma, Y.; Au, C. Ni-modified Mo2C Catalysts for Methane Dry Reforming. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2012, 431, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Deng, Y.; Ge, Y.; Xu, M.; Yu, Q.; Xiao, D.; Yao, S.; Ma, D. Molybdenum Carbide: Controlling the Geometric and Electronic Structure of Noble Metals for the Activation of O-H and C-H Bonds. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 3372–3383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xiang, M.; Li, D.; Li, W.; Zhong, B.; Sun, Y. Performances of Mixed Alcohols Synthesis over Potassium Promoted Molybdenum Carbides. Fuel 2006, 85, 2662–2665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Luan, X.; Yong, J.; Dai, X.; Zhang, X.; Qiao, H.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Peng, W.; Huang, X. Tungsten-Doped Molybdenum Sulfide with Dominant Double-Layer Structure on Mixed MgAl Oxide for Higher Alcohol Synthesis in CO Hydrogenation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 10170–10179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, T.; Sun, K.; Wang, L.; Xie, H.; Tan, Y. Effect of Potassium on the Regulation of C1 Intermediates in Isobutyl Alcohol Synthesis from Syngas over CuLaZrO2 Catalysts. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 9343–9351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xu, R.; Zhang, S.; Roberts, C.B. Mixed Alcohol Synthesis over a K Promoted Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 Catalyst in Supercritical Hexanes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 14514–14524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, C.; Virginie, M.; Griboval-Constant, A.; Khodakov, A. Impact of Potassium Content on the Structure of Molybdenum Nanophases in Alumina Supported Catalysts and Their Performance in Carbon Monoxide Hydrogenation. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2015, 504, 565–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ao, M.; Pham, G.H.; Sunarso, J.; Li, F.; Jin, Y.; Liu, S. Effects of Alkali Promoters on Tri-metallic Co-Ni-Cu-based Perovskite Catalyst for Higher Alcohol Synthesis from Syngas. Catal. Today 2019, 355, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shou, H.; Ferrari, D.; Barton, D.G.; Jones, C.W.; Davis, R.J. Influence of Passivation on the Reactivity of Unpromoted and Rb-Promoted Mo2C Nanoparticles for CO Hydrogenation. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 1408–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Marquart, W.; Morgan, D.J.; Hutchings, G.J.; Claeys, M.; Fischer, N. Oxygenate Formation over K/β-Mo2C Catalysts in the Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2018, 8, 3806–3817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Xiang, M.; Li, D.; Xiao, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.; Zhong, B.; Sun, Y. K/Ni/β-Mo2C: A Highly Active and Selective Catalyst for Higher Alcohols Synthesis from CO Hydrogenation. Catal. Today 2008, 131, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhao, L.; Fang, K.; Jiang, D.; Li, D.; Sun, Y. Sol–gel Derived Ni–Mo Bimetallic Carbide Catalysts and Their Performance for CO Hydrogenation. Catal. Today 2010, 158, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kiai, R.M.; Nematian, T.; Tavasoli, A.; Karimi, A. Effect of Elemental Molar Ratio on the Synthesis of Higher Alcohols over Co-promoted Alkali-modified Mo2C Catalysts Supported on CNTs. J. Energ. Chem. 2015, 24, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liakakou, E.T.; Heracleous, E. Transition Metal Promoted K/Mo2C as Efficient Catalysts for CO Hydrogenation to Higher Alcohols. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 1106–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. De Oliveira, C.; Salahub, D.R.; de Abreu, H.A.; Duarte, H.A. Native Defects in α-Mo2C: Insights from First-Principles Calculations. J. Phy. Chem. C 2014, 118, 25517–25524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, R.; Pang, M.; Chen, X.; Li, C.; Xu, C.; Liang, C. W2C Nanorods with Various Amounts of Vacancy Defects: Determination of Catalytic Active Sites in the Hydrodeoxygenation of Benzofuran. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2017, 7, 1333–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pang, J.; Sun, J.; Zheng, M.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, T. Transition Metal Carbide Catalysts for Biomass Conversion: A Review. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 254, 510–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jiang, R.; Pi, L.; Deng, B.; Hu, L.; Liu, X.; Cui, J.; Mao, X.; Wang, D. Electric Field-Driven Interfacial Alloying for in Situ Fabrication of Nano-Mo2C on Carbon Fabric as Cathode toward Efficient Hydrogen Generation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 38606–38615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vitale, G.; Frauwallner, M.L.; Scott, C.E.; Pereira-Almao, P. Preparation and Characterization of Low-temperature Nano-crystalline Cubic Molybdenum Carbides and Insights on their Structures. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2011, 408, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ge, R.; Huo, J.; Sun, M.; Zhu, M.; Li, Y.; Chou, S.; Li, W. Surface and Interface Engineering: Molybdenum Carbide-Based Nanomaterials for Electrochemical Energy Conversion. Small 2019, 1903380, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. De la Peña O’Shea, V.A.; Álvarez-Galván, M.C.; Campos-Martín, J.M.; Fierro, J.L.G. Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis on mono- and Bimetallic Co and Fe Catalysts in Fixed-bed and Slurry Reactors. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2007, 326, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Krishna, R.; Sie, S.T. Design and Scale-up of the Fischer–Tropsch Bubble Column Slurry Reactor. Fuel Process. Technol. 2000, 64, 73–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, J.; Hodes, G.; Yan, J.; Liu, S. Metal-doped Mo2C (metal = Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) as catalysts on TiO2 for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution in neutral solution. Chin. J. Catal. 2021, 42, 205–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yang, J.; Yu, J.; Zhao, W.; Li, Q.; Wang, Y.; Xu, G. Upgrading Ash-Rich Activated Carbon from Distilled Spirit Lees. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 6037–6043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rosas, M.J.; Bedia, J.; Rodrı´guez-Mirasol, J.; Cordero, T. Preparation of Hemp-Derived Activated Carbon Monoliths Adsorption of Water Vapor. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 1288–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wu, Q.; Christensen, J.M.; Chiarello, G.L.; Duchstein, L.D.L.; Wagner, J.B.; Temel, B.; Grunwaldt, J.-D.; Jensen, A.D. Supported Molybdenum Carbide for Higher Alcohol Synthesis from Syngas. Catal. Today 2013, 215, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Ma, Y.; Chen, M.; Geng, H.; Dong, H.; Wu, P.; Li, X.; Guan, G.; Wang, T. Synergistically Tuning Electronic Structure of Porous β-Mo2C Spheres by Co Doping and Mo-Vacancies Defect Engineering for Optimizing Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Activity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Murugappan, K.; Anderson, E.M.; Teschner, D.; Jones, T.E.; Skorupska, K.; Román-Leshkov, Y. Operando NAP-XPS Unveils Differences in MoO3 and Mo2C During Hydrodeoxygenation. Nat. Catal. 2018, 1, 960–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Catalysts 11 00230 g001 550
Figure 1. XRD patterns of (a) MC, (b) MC-Ni-1, (c) MC-Ni-1.5 and (d) MC-Ni-2 in the 2θ range of (A) 20–80° and (B) 38–42°.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of (a) MC, (b) MC-Ni-1, (c) MC-Ni-1.5 and (d) MC-Ni-2 in the 2θ range of (A) 20–80° and (B) 38–42°.
Catalysts 11 00230 g001
Catalysts 11 00230 g002 550
Figure 2. HRTEM images of (a) MC, (b) MC-Ni-1, (c) MC-Ni-1.5 and (d) MC-Ni-2.
Figure 2. HRTEM images of (a) MC, (b) MC-Ni-1, (c) MC-Ni-1.5 and (d) MC-Ni-2.
Catalysts 11 00230 g002
Catalysts 11 00230 g003 550
Figure 3. SEM images of (a) MC, (b) MC-Ni-1, (c) MC-Ni-1.5 and (d) MC-Ni-2.
Figure 3. SEM images of (a) MC, (b) MC-Ni-1, (c) MC-Ni-1.5 and (d) MC-Ni-2.
Catalysts 11 00230 g003
Catalysts 11 00230 g004 550
Figure 4. Mo 3d XPS spectra of (a) MC, (b) MC-Ni-1, (c) MC-Ni-1.5 and (d) MC-Ni-2. Mo0: green line, Mo2+: blue line, Mo4+: pink line, Mo5+: orange line, Mo6+: cyan line.
Figure 4. Mo 3d XPS spectra of (a) MC, (b) MC-Ni-1, (c) MC-Ni-1.5 and (d) MC-Ni-2. Mo0: green line, Mo2+: blue line, Mo4+: pink line, Mo5+: orange line, Mo6+: cyan line.
Catalysts 11 00230 g004
Catalysts 11 00230 g005 550
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of Mo2C surface. (A) Mo0, (B) carbon defects and (C) Mo defects.
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of Mo2C surface. (A) Mo0, (B) carbon defects and (C) Mo defects.
Catalysts 11 00230 g005
Catalysts 11 00230 g006 550
Figure 6. TG curves of (a) MC, (b) MC-Ni-1, (c) MC-Ni-1.5 and (d) MC-Ni-2.
Figure 6. TG curves of (a) MC, (b) MC-Ni-1, (c) MC-Ni-1.5 and (d) MC-Ni-2.
Catalysts 11 00230 g006
Catalysts 11 00230 g007 550
Figure 7. XRD patterns of (a) MC-270, (b) MC-305, (c) MC-450 and (d) MC-550.
Figure 7. XRD patterns of (a) MC-270, (b) MC-305, (c) MC-450 and (d) MC-550.
Catalysts 11 00230 g007
Catalysts 11 00230 g008 550
Figure 8. The ratios of the surface, bulk phase and total weight gain of the catalysts to the total weight of MoO3 obtained by the complete oxidation of the catalysts, calculated from the TG analysis results.
Figure 8. The ratios of the surface, bulk phase and total weight gain of the catalysts to the total weight of MoO3 obtained by the complete oxidation of the catalysts, calculated from the TG analysis results.
Catalysts 11 00230 g008
Table
Table 1. Physical properties of the catalysts.
Table 1. Physical properties of the catalysts.
Catalystsa Ni:Mo bd (nm)cSBET (m2 g−1)d C/Mo
MC-10.217.51.4
MC-Ni-11:919.22.60.75
MC-Ni-1.51.5:8.518.73.40.85
MC-Ni-22:824.72.20.96
a Molar ratio of Ni and Mo. b. The size of Mo2C crystallite, calculated by Scherrer formula according to the peak at 2θ = 39.5° in the XRD patterns. c BET surface area obtained by nitrogen adsorption method. d Determined by TG.
Table
Table 2. The catalytic performance of the catalysts.
Table 2. The catalytic performance of the catalysts.
CatalystsaXCO (%)brs
(mmol·gcat−1∙h−1∙m−2∙g)		cS (%)ROH Distribution (%)eSTYROH
(mg gcat−1 h−1)
MeOHC2+OHd HC MeOHC2+OH
MC4.40.06710.731.158.225.674.47.5
MC-Ni-19.71.17929.130.740.248.751.324.3
MC-Ni-1.57.40.70735.826.238.057.742.325.0
MC-Ni-24.40.63438.529.831.756.343.714.4
a CO conversion. b rs refers to CO conversion rate per unit specific surface area. c Selectivity: free of CO2. d Hydrocarbons. e Space-time yield of mixed alcohol. Reaction conditions: T = 180 °C, P = 5 MPa, H2:CO = 2:1, 0.69 g catalysts, V=20 mL min−1, using dioxane (50 mL) as solvent.
Table
Table 3. Comparison with the activity of the catalysts in references for MAS.
Table 3. Comparison with the activity of the catalysts in references for MAS.
CatalystsaXCO (%)bS (%)cSTYROH
(mg∙gcat−1∙h−1)		dT, PH2/COReactor TypeRef.
MeOHC2+OHHC
6.1%Ni/K/Mo2C3.77.834.857.424.5250, 4.02fixed bed[42]
6.5%Cu/K/Mo2C7.36.724.269.135.4280, 4.02fixed bed[42]
1.5%Rb/Mo2C/Al2O35.016.040.044.0-300, 3.01fixed bed[37]
K2CO3/Mo2C3.820.130.449.520.0250, 101fixed bed[54]
1%Rh/Mo2C/SiO21.560.020.020.0-250, 5.81fixed bed[8]
MC-Ni-1.57.435.826.238.025.0180, 5.02slurry bedThis work
a CO conversion. b Selectivity: free of CO2. c Space-time yield of mixed alcohol. d Reaction temperature (°C) and pressure (MPa).
Table
Table 4. The percentage content of Mo species calculated from the XPS spectra.
Table 4. The percentage content of Mo species calculated from the XPS spectra.
CatalystsMo 3d
Mo0Mo2+Mo4+Mo5+Mo6+
MC042.721.78.826.8
MC-Ni-113.443.623.910.98.2
MC-Ni-1.54.650.228.311.95.0
MC-Ni-22.855.623.39.09.3
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hao, Z.; Li, X.; Tian, Y.; Ding, T.; Yang, G.; Ma, Q.; Tsubaki, N.; Li, X. Influence of Carbon Content in Ni-Doped Mo2C Catalysts on CO Hydrogenation to Mixed Alcohol. Catalysts 2021, 11, 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11020230

AMA Style

Hao Z, Li X, Tian Y, Ding T, Yang G, Ma Q, Tsubaki N, Li X. Influence of Carbon Content in Ni-Doped Mo2C Catalysts on CO Hydrogenation to Mixed Alcohol. Catalysts. 2021; 11(2):230. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11020230

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hao, Zhenjiong, Xiaoshen Li, Ye Tian, Tong Ding, Guohui Yang, Qingxiang Ma, Noritatsu Tsubaki, and Xingang Li. 2021. "Influence of Carbon Content in Ni-Doped Mo2C Catalysts on CO Hydrogenation to Mixed Alcohol" Catalysts 11, no. 2: 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11020230

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop