Next Article in Journal
Microstructure of Bio-Based Building Materials: New Insights into the Hysteresis Phenomenon and Its Consequences
Next Article in Special Issue
Long-Term Behavior Related to Water Ingress in Mortars Which Combine Expanded and Natural Cork Lightweight Aggregates and Eco-Friendly Cements
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Verification of Wireless Vibration Sensors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Improvement of the Mechanical Properties of Mortars Manufactured with Partial Substitution of Portland Cement by Kaolinitic Clays

by
Beatriz Astudillo
1,
Domingo A. Martín
1,2,
Jorge L. Costafreda
2,*,
Leticia Presa
2,
Miguel A. Sanjuán
3 and
José Luis Parra
2
1
Laboratorio Oficial para Ensayos de Materiales de Construcción (LOEMCO), Fundación Gómez Pardo, C/Eric Kandell, 1, 28906 Getafe, Spain
2
Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Minas y Energía, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, C/Ríos Rosas, 21, 28003 Madrid, Spain
3
Department of Science and Technology of Building Materials, Civil Engineering School, Technical University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2023, 13(7), 1647; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071647
Submission received: 14 June 2023 / Revised: 24 June 2023 / Accepted: 27 June 2023 / Published: 28 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Studies in Concrete Materials)

Abstract

:
Presently, the search for urgent solutions to mitigate climate change has become a global priority. One of the most important challenges is the characterization, standardization, and technology of sustainable natural raw materials, which will significantly improve the quality of common types of cement, the production process of which emits large amounts of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. This work is focused on the study of natural kaolinitic clays (NKC) from the eastern part of the Iberian Peninsula and its main objective is to define and normalize their properties as natural pozzolanic materials. This research consists of an initial study to determine the morphological and chemical properties using SEM and XRF. Furthermore, the physical properties of the samples were studied, such as thermic treatment (TT), Blane particle finesse (BPF), real density (RD) and apparent density (AD), porosity (P), volume stability (VS) and start and final setting time (SFST). On the other hand, technological analyses were carried out as follows: chemical analysis (CATQ), pozzolanicity (CAP), mechanical compression strength tests at 7, 28, and 90 days (MCST) as well as the ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV). XRF results indicated that the SiO2 content (49.9–51.0%) of kaolinitic clay in its natural state (NKC) increases to 57.41 and 58.10%, respectively, when calcined (CKC). The chemical analysis of pozzolanicity established that the NKC does not show pozzolanic activity during the first 8 and 15 days; however, once calcinated, its pozzolanic reactivity increases substantially. On the other hand, the results of the mechanical stress tests (MCST) indicate an exponential increase in mechanical resistance from 7 to 90 days, which is higher in mortars made with CKC; similarly, and according to the results of the calculation of the Resistant Activity Index (RAI), it shows that the substitutions of Portland cement (PC) by NKC are effective between the ranges of 10 and 25%, while in the case of the substitution of PC by CKC, all formulations (10, 25 and 40%) are effective. This research establishes that the kaolinitic clays of the east of the Iberian Peninsula can be considered quality pozzolanic materials, capable of partially replacing Portland cement. The results presented here could be used as guidelines for the understanding and application of natural pozzolanic materials contributing to the improvement of types of cement, mortars, and concretes, which would positively affect the quality and preservation of the environment as well as the sustainability of eco-efficient construction materials.

1. Introduction

Presently, kaolinitic clay is well known, studied, and used today in many scientific and industrial fields, as it is a highly valued and versatile raw material from the point of view of its use as a pozzolan. In this sense, the work of Tironi et al. [1,2] established that kaolinitic clays have sufficient pozzolanic reactivity even when they replace Portland cement by 30%, which is also confirmed by Cao et al. [3], Almenares et al. [4] and Alujas et al. [5]. On the other hand, Marvila et al. [6] managed to partially replace hydrated limestone with kaolinitic clays, establishing that this substitution becomes effective even when using 50%. Msinjili et al. [7] developed bricks based on calcined kaolinitic clays achieving a significant improvement in the resistance to chloride penetration. In the research of Boakye et al. [8], a study of the mechanical and chemical properties of mortars containing kaolinitic clays was carried out to establish their suitability in the construction industry; According to their conclusions, a proportion of 20% of these clays is suitable for this purpose. These conclusions have also been confirmed in the work of Singh [9]. In the manufacture of cement, there is much research today that validates the effectiveness of the use of kaolinitic clays as supplementary cementitious material capable of partially replacing Portland cement clinker by 30–50%, which also has an important effect which is to greatly reduce the vast amounts of CO2 being released into the atmosphere, as well as improvements in mechanical strength and durability [10,11,12,13,14,15]. Nevertheless, kaolinitic clays are used in many applications and new fields, such as in the manufacture of ceramic materials [16], the adsorption of methane, Ni(II) and Mn(II) [17,18], the manufacture of cosmetic and pharmaceutical products [19] as well as in soil stabilization [20]. Finally, the current rise of the ternary mixture of limestone, calcined clays, and cement, known as “LC3 cement”, should be highlighted as an ideal formula for the production of more efficient and less environmentally aggressive cement; authors such as Scrivener et al. [21], Krishnan et al. [22], and Canbek et al. [23], among others, have highlighted the advantages of these cementitious mixtures in their recent studies.
The specific purpose of this research is to establish the nature of the kaolinitic clays that lie in the eastern part of the Iberian Peninsula as pozzolans (Figure 1) and prove their ability to replace part of the Portland cement (PC) in mortar mixtures. This research has been developed in several stages; first, a characterization of the morphological, mineralogical, and chemical features of kaolinitic clays was made through SEM and XRF; second, the characterization of physical properties was also made; and third, a chemical analysis study of pozzolanicity was made as well as mechanical resistance tests and non-destructive analysis of ultrasonic pulse which established parameters of quality and technical viability of the kaolinitic clays.
The data and conclusions established in this work could be considered to be a methodology to characterize and normalize kaolinitic clays, used mainly to improve pozzolanic cement, mortars, and concretes adapted to the demands of environmental care and with low CO2 emission into the atmosphere.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

To carry out this work, a representative sample of kaolinitic clays weighing 60 kg was chosen and taken directly from the outcrops located in the eastern region of the Iberian Peninsula (Figure 1). The sample is characterized by its light colors, which can be pale gray, white, and pinkish. It is not very compact, earthy, and powdery in appearance (Figure 2).
Before submitting the sample to the study planned in this research, a series of initial preparations were carried out in phases, as follows: a grinding phase in a planetary ball mill Retsch, model PM 100, for 10 s and at 250 rpm; a standardized homogenization phase using an approved cracker machine; and a selection phase of standard quantities of samples according to the guidelines in each of the standards used in this research.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Analysis Using SEM and XRF

A SEM study was carried out to monitor the textural, structural, and morphological properties of the sample under study, both in the natural state (NKC) and calcined (CKC). A Hitachi S-570 electron microscope, owned by the E.T.S.I.M.E. of the Polytechnic University of Madrid, was used. The microscope is equipped with a Kevex-1728 analyzer and a BIORAD Polaron, as well as a power supply and a Polaron SEM coating system. It uses two different pieces of software, namely Winshell and Printerface.
XRF analysis was applied to obtain information on the chemical composition of the natural kaolinitic clay (NKC) sample. To develop this analysis, a portion of natural kaolinitic clay was mixed with a flux with the following ratio: NKC/Flux: 0.3–5.5. Next, this mixture was melted together with a lithium tetraborate compound, with the help of the Perl ′3 induction device, by Philips. Finally, the sample obtained was subjected to XRF spectrometry analysis, using wavelength dispersion (WDXRF) in PANalytical’s apparatus conditioned with a Rhodium tube.

2.2.2. Physical Characterization Tests (PCT)

The natural kaolinitic clay sample was subjected to a thermic treatment (TT) test to expel moisture and other undesirable substances that could interact negatively with the experiments. Initially, the sample was heated in a Binder stove, model 9010-0101 ED 240, to 105 °C for 8 h. It was then calcined in a Thermo Scientific Heraeus muffle furnace, model M 110 Muffle Furnace, at 800 °C for 1 h. A granulometric analysis was conducted to match the size of the kaolinitic clay particles with that of Portland cement following the guidelines of the Standard UNE-EN-196-6:2019 [25].
Other tests were carried out to determine the real density (RD) using the Micromeritics Accupyc 1330 air pycnometer (Standard UNE-EN-80103:2013) [26], apparent density (AD) and porosity (P) (Standard UNE-EN 1097-3:1999) [27]. Volume stability (VS) was carried out in accordance with the guidelines given by the Standard UNE-EN 196-3:2017 [28]. This method determined the volumetric expansivity of the paste composed of PC/NKC.
Finally, the start and final setting time (SFST) was calculated through the Standard UNE-EN 196-3:2017 [28].

2.2.3. Technological Tests for the Qualitative Assessment of Natural (NKC) and Calcined Kaolinitic Clays (CKC)

A chemical analysis was carried out to determine the technological quality (CATQ) of natural (NKC) and calcined kaolinitic clays (CKC) to study the pozzolanic properties of these samples and monitor their influence on the partial substitution of Portland cement (PC). This analysis also determined the amount of SiO2 capable of reacting with Ca(OH)2, as well as the percentage of insoluble residue formed as a reaction product, the presence of sulfates, chlorides, magnesium oxide, and free lime. The reason for doing this test was the Standard UNE-EN 196-2:2014 [29].
The chemical analysis of pozzolanicity (CAP) to monitor the pozzolanic reactivity of NKC and CKC samples was performed following the guidelines of the Standard UNE-EN 196-5:2011 [30]. The fundamental criterion of this test is to determine the degree of pozzolanicity of the samples by comparing the concentrations of calcium ions (expressed as calcium hydroxide) dissolved in the solution with an amount of calcium ions capable of saturating a solution of the same alkalinity. When the amount of calcium ions is less than the saturation concentration, the analysis is considered positive, and the samples analyzed are considered to be suitable pozzolans. To determine the hydroxyl ion [OH] concentrated in the solution, as well as the CaO the following formulas were used:
O H = 1000 × 0.1 × V 3 × f 2 50 = 2 × V 3 × f 2
where:
  • [OH]: is the concentration in hydroxyl ions (mmol/L).
  • V3: is the volume of the hydrochloric acid solution (0.1 mol/L).
  • f2: is the factor of the hydrochloric acid solution (0.1 mol/L).
C a O = 1000 × 0.03 × V 4 × f 1 50 = 0.6 × V 4 × f 1
where:
  • [CaO]: is the concentration of calcium oxide (mmol/L).
  • V4: is the volume of EDTA solution used in the titration.
  • f1: is the factor of the EDTA solution.
Mechanical compressive stress tests (MCST) were carried out at 7, 28, and 90 days to monitor the rate of increase in the mechanical resistance of the specimens manufactured with NKC and CKC compared to the reference specimen made exclusively from Portland cement (RMS). Additionally, in the preparation of the mortar mixtures, 225 g of demineralized water (DW) and 1350 g of natural sand (NS) used as fine aggregate were selected. Table 1 provides details of the proportions of each material. The dosages used in each of the mixing projects rigorously adhered to the criteria of the Standard UNE-EN 196-1:2018 [31].
The method to determine the ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) is a non-destructive test applied to the specimens of mortars already consolidated and is based on calculating the time an ultrasonic pulse takes to travel through each specimen. In addition to the propagation time, it also allows the calculation of the speed of the pulse. Through the data obtained, a reliable interpretation can be made of the structural makeup of the specimens, the degree of homogeneity, the influence of the materials on the interfaces, and the possible defects produced during the setting process, among other phenomena. Each stage of this test has been carried out in accordance with the Standard UNE-EN ISO 16810 [32].
To determine the UPV the following formula was used (3):
U P V * = d t
where:
  • d: distance (km).
  • t: time(s).
  • *UPV is in km/s.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Figure 3a–d shows several microphotographs made with an electronic microscope of the samples of natural kaolinitic clays (NKC) and calcined clays (CKC). The samples in the natural state (Figure 3a,b) have pseudo-hexagonal and tabular aspects, although they also appear as subrounded to rounded aggregates of irregular texture, exhibiting discontinuous and intermittent edges. The sizes range from very fine to thick, and their color varies from light gray to white. The surfaces of the grains have small pores of unimportant dimensions. The morphology exhibited by kaolin grains seems to indicate an alluvial sedimentary origin [33].
In calcinated samples (Figure 3c,d), an increase in porosity due to heating is highlighted [34]; some of the original texture has been modified, markedly increasing the surface area of the samples [35].

3.2. X-ray Fluorescence (XRF)

The data provided by the analysis of the chemical composition of the samples and seen in Table 2 suggest three fundamental facts: high contents of SiO2 (NKC-01: 49.9%/NKC-02: 51.0%), Al2O3 (NKC-01: 31.5%/NKC-02: 33.5%) and high values of loss by calcination (NKC-01: 12.0%/NKC-12.1%). According to the work of the authors in [36], the samples of kaolinitic clays seem to have sufficient quality as sources of kaolin.

3.3. Physical Tests (PT)

Table 3 and Figure 4 detail the results obtained by granulometry analysis. It also shows the graphs with the variations in particle size distribution of the NKC-01 and NKC-02 samples.
Table 4 shows the remaining results of the physical properties of natural kaolinitic clay samples, such as real density (RD), apparent density (AD), and porosity (P). On the other hand, the results of the study of volume stability (VS) start and final setting time (SFST) are presented in Table 5.
According to the data of the real and apparent density, as well as the porosity, it seems that both samples have similar characteristics, which can be interpreted to mean that the geological conditions under which they were formed were influenced by the same natural factors [34,37]. Another aspect to note is that the presence of kaolinitic clays in the cement paste hardly influences the volume stability of the paste and exhibits practically insignificant values in the order of 0.5 to 1 mm (Table 5). Similarly, it seems that pastes made with NKC in which they replace Portland cement (PC) between 10 and 25% experience a significant decrease in the start and final setting time, which is even lower than Portland cement (PC). A similar but even more remarkable case occurs with pastes containing CKC (Table 5), where the start and final setting times of the process are shortened even more. This is very significant, as pozzolans usually produce the opposite effect [38,39,40].

3.4. Chemical Analysis of Technological Quality (CATQ)

The results of the chemical analysis of the technological quality of the samples (NKC and CKC) are shown in Table 6. The results show that these kaolinitic clays in their natural state have a high content of SiO2 (NKC-01: 52.39%/NKC-02: 50.97%) and Al2O3 (NKC-01: 31.80%/NKC-02: 31.56%) that increase significantly after the calcination process between 88 and 91% and 88%, respectively. The increase of these compounds, mainly in the case of SiO2, seems to be a consequence of the transformation process of the crystalline siliceous phase, present in the insoluble residue, to the amorphous siliceous phase, due to calcination [41]. The formation of this new amorphous phase makes the samples react even more and improves their qualities as pozzolans [42].
The high values determined for reactive SiO2 are highlighted, from which it follows that for samples NKC-01 and NKC-02 about 68.4 and 68.6%, respectively, of the total SiO2 can have a pozzolanic reaction. In the case of calcined samples (CKC-01 and CKC-02), this percentage increases to between 77.3 and 83.3%, respectively. On the other hand, a decrease of 64–68% of the insoluble residue takes place after the calcination process of the samples, which seems to contribute to the increase in the pozzolanic properties of these kaolinitic clays [43,44,45]. In relation to the Loss on Ignition (LOI), a comparatively similar situation seems to occur, where the values decrease drastically by up to 2.8–3%. The total loss of moisture after calcination, added to the low contents of Cl, SO3, and MgO, makes the samples increase their qualities as pozzolans [46].

3.5. Chemical Analysis of Pozzolanicity (CAP)

Figure 5a,b graphically shows the results of the chemical analysis of pozzolanicity (CAP) to which the samples of kaolinitic clays were subjected both in natural state (NKC-01, NKC-02) and calcined (CKC-01, CKC-02). This is in accordance with the results shown in Figure 5a, which establishes that samples NKC-01 and NKC-02 do not manifest pozzolanic properties at 8 or 15 days of research, which is deduced by the position that both occupy above the isothermal solubility curve.
According to the authors in [30], the pozzolanic capacity of a sample is determined when its location occurs below the above-mentioned curve. The low pozzolanic response of the samples analyzed in their natural state could be due to an excess of crystalline silica present in them. As already seen in Table 6, it could also be due to the presence of non-reactive organic matter [47].
A comparatively different fact occurs when the samples have undergone a calcination process (CKC-01 and CKC-02) (Figure 5b), where it is evident that the samples have acquired significant pozzolanic properties, mainly the CKC-02 sample. In both cases, there is a tendency to increase the pozzolanic properties from 8 to 15 days of testing. The cause of this increase could be found in the fact that during the calcination process, crystalline silica could be converted into amorphous silica, which is more likely to react in solution with Ca(OH)2 [48]; this contribution of silica could reinforce the original contents of reactive silica (Table 6) and enhance the pozzolanic character of the samples [49]. It could also be argued that after calcination substances of organic origin and other non-reactive residues have been removed [50].

3.6. Mechanical Strength Tests (MST) at 7, 28, and 90 Days

Figure 6 shows the results of the mechanical strength test (MST) performed at 7, 28, and 90 days of setting. It seems evident that the dosages of mortar specimens with the presence of natural (NKC) and calcined (CKC) kaolinitic clays, in proportions of 10, 25, and 40%, contribute to the gain of mechanical strength throughout the period of research. During the monitoring of the mechanical behavior, it is noted that the specimens made with 10% of NKC and CKC are those that have higher values of mechanical resistance, followed by those formulated with 25% and 40%. The specimens made with each mixture maintain a homogeneous mechanical behavior over time, although the case of the sample NKC-01/PC 10/90% is highlighted, as it practically equals the value of mechanical resistance of the reference specimen (RMS) at 90 days of age.
Figure 7 shows the evolution of the mechanical compressive strengths of mortar specimens manufactured with standardized amounts (10, 25, and 40%) of calcinated kaolinitic clay (CKC). In relation to what is observed in Figure 6, the scenario is very different; the pozzolanic behavior of the calcined samples positively influences the hydraulic reactivity of the CKC-PC interface, leading to significant values of compressive strength from 7 to 90 days. In the specific case of the 7 days of curing, note how all specimens made with 10 and 25% CKC have equaled or exceeded the reference specimen (RMS); this trend is still observed at 28 and 90 days, where even specimens with a proportion of 40% CKC equal or significantly approach the RMS.
This seems to show that several factors analyzed above, such as the chemical composition and physical properties of the samples, improve significantly after the calcination process, which not only influences the pozzolanic reactivity but also the hydraulic reactivation, which in turn implies an improvement in the mechanical properties of the mortar specimens. Researchers have demonstrated these anomalous increases in mechanical resistance in their investigation with other pozzolans such as natural zeolites [51], dacitic tuffs [52], volcanic ash [53], and bentonite clays [54].
The data in Figure 6 and Figure 7 show the Resistance Activity Index (RAI) calculated for all the mortar specimens dosed with natural kaolinitic clay (NKC) and calcined clay (CKC) studied in this work (Table 7). The calculation was made through Formula (4), by which the values of mechanical resistance to compression of all the specimens are related to the reference (RMS); the resulting values of the calculation equal to or greater than 75% are considered positive.
R A I = V 1 × f ( % ) V 2
where:
V1:
Mechanical compressive strength (MPa) of mixed mortar specimens produced according to NDT/PC and CDT/PC formulations.
V2:
Mechanical compressive strength (MPa) of reference mortar specimens.
f(%):
Percentage factor with a value of 100%.
The assessment of the data that appears in Table 7 establishes an RAI value pattern of behavior that depends directly on the percentage of kaolinitic clay present in the mortar mixtures, either in the natural state (NKC) or calcined (CKC). On this basis, it is observed that the specimens with 10% NKC are the only ones capable of exceeding 75% of the normalized RAI calculated for the periods of 7, 28, and 90 days; and although the values calculated for NKC at 25% are quite close to the reference limit value, the truth is that it does not reach it at any of the study ages, in the same way as NKC at 40%. However, specimens that include calcined kaolinitic clay (CKC) at 10, 25, and 40% in their composition not only reach the limit value of the RAI but also exceed it abnormally from initial curing periods up to 90 days. The calculation of the Resistant Activity Index (RAI) has once again permitted the recording of the criteria established in this work regarding the influence of the chemical constitution, porosity, specific surface, and pozzolanic activity of the samples studied and their increase once they have been subjected to high normalized temperatures. The papers of Presa et al. [55], Martín et al. [56], and Rosado et al. [57] describe similar conclusions that support the arguments discussed in this research.
Table 7. Calculation of the values of the Resistance Activity Index (RAI) from the mechanical resistances of the mortar specimens manufactured with NKC and CKC with 10, 25, and 40%.
Table 7. Calculation of the values of the Resistance Activity Index (RAI) from the mechanical resistances of the mortar specimens manufactured with NKC and CKC with 10, 25, and 40%.
Sample7 Days of Curing28 Days of Curing90 Days of Curing
Compressive Strength
(MPa)
RAI 1
Calculated
(%)
Compressive Strength
(MPa)
RAI
Calculated
(%)
Compressive Strength
(MPa)
RAI
Calculated
(%)
RMS 242.7-51.6-57.8-
NKC 3-01-1037.186.944.085.256.197.05
NKC-01-2529.769.633.865.535.962.1
NKC-01-4019.545.720.840.324.542.4
CKC 4-01-1047.8111.959.0114.366.4114.9
CKC-01-2546.7109.456.9110.361.7106.7
CKC-01-4038.089.054.5105.660.1104.0
NKC-02-1039.291.845.989.048.083.04
NKC-02-2529.869.833.865.535.761.8
NKC-02-4018.844.0224.547.424.842.9
CKC-02-1051.2119.960.2116.764.7112.0
CKC-02-2550.9119.256.7109.960.3104.3
CKC-02-4033.979.447.992.852.290.3
1 Resistant activity index; 2 Reference mortar sample; 3 Natural kaolinitic clay (10, 25 and 40%); 4 Calcined kaolinitic clay (10, 25 and 40%).

3.7. Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV)

Table 8 shows the values obtained by calculating the UPV on mortar specimens containing natural kaolinitic clay (NKC) and calcined clay (CKC) with proportions of 10, 25, and 40%. As can be seen, the lowest value of the propagation time of the ultrasonic wave corresponds to the reference specimen (RMS). Specimens made with only 10% NKC and CKC are very close to the value of the ultrasonic pulse propagation time of the reference specimen (RMS) [55]; however, a growing increase in propagation time can be observed as the percentage of natural (NKC) and calcined (CKC) kaolinitic clays in the specimens increases, being comparatively higher in formulas with 25 and 40%, respectively. Regarding the calculated ultrasonic pulse velocity, there is an inverse relationship is established with respect to the UWPT, meaning that the values tend to decrease when the percentages of NKC and CKC increase in the specimens [58]. Furthermore, the formulas with 10 and 25% have higher values regarding the velocity parameter. According to the results shown in Table 8, it seems that the cause of this behavior lies in the complex composition of the kaolinitic clays themselves, mainly in the mineral, chemical, pozzolanic properties, porosity, and calcination conditions [59,60,61]. This heterogeneity inherent to the mass of the specimens studied is more marked as the percentage of NKC and CKC increases.

4. Conclusions

The samples of natural kaolinitic clays (NKC) are characterized by their high contents of SiO2 (>50%) and Al2O3 (>30%); However, despite this, they do not have pozzolanic behavior at 8 or 15 days. Nevertheless, once the samples were subjected to the calcination process, the pozzolanic properties manifested and increased markedly for the test periods. The reason for this behavior could be found in the highly crystalline nature of the silica present in the natural sample, which is not prone to react; however, after the calcination process, it seems that this silica passes into its amorphous phase, making it more reactive.
Kaolinitic clays, both natural (NKC) and calcined (CKC), at 10, 25, and 40%, contribute to the increase of the mechanical resistance of mortar specimens from 7 to 90 days. In the case of NKC at 10%, the gain is very positive in relation to the formulas of 25 and 40%. However, the increase in mechanical resistance grows exponentially when the kaolinitic clays have been calcined (CKC). It is significant that at 7 days, the specimens with CKC at 10 and 25% equal or exceed the value of the resistance of the reference specimen; this phenomenon continues to manifest at 28 and 90 days of curing, a period in which specimens with 40% formulations also match the mechanical strength of RMS.
Specimens made with NKC only exceed 75% of the Resistant Activity Index when their proportion was 10%, a fact that is different from what happens with specimens containing CKC in which all calculated RAI values significantly exceed the normalized limit value.
The nature and proportion of the kaolinitic clays (NKC and CKC) used in this research seem to cause an increase in the propagation time of the ultrasonic wave and a decrease in the speed of the ultrasonic pulse through the specimens, which depends directly on the proportion of NKC and CKC in the specimens. Therefore, specimens with a content of 10% NKC and CKC are those that behave closest to the reference specimen (RMS).
All of the above emphasizes that the materials analyzed in this research could not only be capable of replacing Portland cement in a standardized way but could also be used to improve eco-efficient pozzolanic cement that is more environmentally friendly, therefore reducing the emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere and contributing to the process of reversing climate change. Furthermore, for industrial processes, costs could be comparatively lower due to the use of geologically abundant and easily accessible natural materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L.C. and D.A.M.; methodology, J.L.C., D.A.M. and L.P.; software, L.P., B.A., M.A.S. and J.L.P.; validation, J.L.C., D.A.M. and L.P.; formal analysis, J.L.C., D.A.M., L.P., B.A., M.A.S. and J.L.P.; investigation, J.L.C., D.A.M., L.P., B.A., M.A.S. and J.L.P.; resources, J.L.C. and D.A.M.; data curation, J.L.C. and D.A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, J.L.C., D.A.M. and L.P.; writing—review and editing, J.L.C., D.A.M. and L.P.; visualization, J.L.C., D.A.M., L.P., B.A., M.A.S. and J.L.P.; supervision, J.L.C. and D.A.M.; project administration, J.L.C. and D.A.M.; funding acquisition, J.L.C. and D.A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Laboratorio Oficial para Ensayos de Materiales de Construcción (LOEMCO) and the Fundación Gómez Pardo for the preparation of the samples, the performance of the tests and the interpretation of the results, as well as the financial support offered to cover the translation costs of this work. The authors would also like to thank the laboratories of the Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Minas y Energía of the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (Spain), as well as the Instituto Español del Cemento y sus Aplicaciones (IECA) for their support with the granulometric, XRF and SEM analyses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tironi, A.; Trezza, M.A.; Scian, A.N.; Irassar, E.F. Potential use of Argentine kaolinitic clays as pozzolanic material. Appl. Clay Sci. 2014, 101, 468–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tironi, A.; Trezza, M.A.; Scian, A.N.; Irassar, E.F. Kaolinitic calcined clays: Factors affecting its performance as pozzolans. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 28, 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Ma, Y.; Wang, H. Recent progress of utilization of activated kaolinitic clay in cementitious construction materials. Compos. Part B Eng. 2021, 211, 108636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Almenares, R.S.; Vizcaíno, L.M.; Damas, S.; Mathieu, A.; Alujas, A.; Martirena, F. Industrial calcination of kaolinitic clays to make reactive pozzolans. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2017, 6, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Alujas, A.; Fernández, R.; Quintana, R.; Scrivener, K.L.; Martirena, F. Pozzolanic reactivity of low grade kaolinitic clays: Influence of calcination temperature and impact of calcination products on OPC hydration. Appl. Clay Sci. 2015, 108, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Marvila, M.T.; Alexandre, J.; Azevedo, A.R.G.; Zanelato, E.B.; Xavier, G.C.; Monteiro, S.N. Study on the replacement of the hydrated lime by kaolinitic clay in mortars. Adv. Appl. Ceram. 2019, 118, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Msinjili, N.S.; Vogler, N.; Sturm, P.; Neubert, M.; Schröder, H.-J.; Kühne, H.-C.; Hünger, K.-J.; Gluth, G.J. Calcined brick clays and mixed clays as supplementary cementitious materials: Effects on the performance of blended cement mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 266, 120990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Boakye, K.; Khorami, M.; Saidani, M.; Ganjian, E.; Dunster, A.; Ehsani, A.; Tyrer, M. Mechanochemical Characterisation of Calcined Impure Kaolinitic Clay as a Composite Binder in Cementitious Mortars. J. Compos. Sci. 2022, 6, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Singh, N.B. Clays and Clay Minerals in the Construction Industry. Minerals 2022, 12, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Avet, F.; Snellings, R.; Diaz, A.A.; Ben Haha, M.; Scrivener, K. Development of a new rapid, relevant and reliable (R3) test method to evaluate the pozzolanic reactivity of calcined kaolinitic clays. Cem. Concr. Res. 2016, 85, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cardinaud, G.; Rozière, E.; Martinage, O.; Loukili, A.; Barnes-Davin, L.; Paris, M.; Deneele, D. Calcined clay—Limestone cements: Hydration processes with high and low-grade kaolinite clays. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 277, 122271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Krishnan, S.; Bishnoi, S. A numerical approach for designing composite cements with calcined clay and limestone. Cem. Concr. Res. 2020, 138, 106232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Teklay, A.; Yin, C.; Rosendahl, L.; Bøjer, M. Calcination of kaolinite clay particles for cement production: A modeling study. Cem. Concr. Res. 2014, 61–62, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Malacarne, C.; Longhi, M.; Silva, M.; Gonçalves, J.; Rodríguez, E.; Kirchheim, A. Influence of low-grade materials as clinker substitute on the rheological behavior, hydration and mechanical performance of ternary cements. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2021, 15, e00776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Babafemi, A.J.; Knobel, H.; Kolawole, J.T.; Oyebanjo, O.M.; Bukalo, N.N.; Paul, S.C.; Miah, J. Performance of Selected South African Kaolinitic Clays for Limestone Calcined Clay Cement. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 10751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dondi, M.; Raimondo, M.; Zanelli, C. Clays and bodies for ceramic tiles: Reappraisal and technological classification. Appl. Clay Sci. 2014, 96, 91–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ji, L.; Zhang, T.; Milliken, K.L.; Qu, J.; Zhang, X. Experimental investigation of main controls to methane adsorption in clay-rich rocks. Appl. Geochem. 2012, 27, 2533–2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dawodu, F.A.; Akpomie, K.G. Simultaneous adsorption of Ni(II) and Mn(II) ions from aqueous solution unto a Nigerian kaolinite clay. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2014, 3, 129–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Lopezgalindo, A.; Viseras, C.; Cerezo, P. Compositional, technical and safety specifications of clays to be used as pharmaceutical and cosmetic products. Appl. Clay Sci. 2007, 36, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kavak, A.; Baykal, G. Long-term behavior of lime-stabilized kaolinite clay. Environ. Earth Sci. 2011, 66, 1943–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Scrivener, K.; Martirena, F.; Bishnoi, S.; Maity, S. Calcined clay limestone cements (LC3). Cem. Concr. Res. 2018, 114, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Krishnan, S.; Emmanuel, A.C.; Bishnoi, S. Hydration and phase assemblage of ternary cements with calcined clay and limestone. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 222, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Canbek, O.; Xu, Q.; Mei, Y.; Washburn, N.; Kurtis, K.E. Predicting the rheology of limestone calcined clay cements (LC3): Linking composition and hydration kinetics to yield stress through Machine Learning. Cem. Concr. Res. 2022, 160, 106925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Google Earth. Available online: https://earth.google.com/web/@39.28941152,-4.23079161,-2731.47524373a,1782178.3365798d,35y,0h,0t,0r (accessed on 10 April 2023).
  25. UNE-EN-196-6:2019; Métodos de Ensayo de Cementos. Parte 6: Determinación de la Finura. AENOR: Madrid, Spain, 2011.
  26. UNE-EN-80103:2013; Métodos de Ensayo de Cementos. Ensayos Físicos. Determinación de la Densidad Real. AENOR: Madrid, Spain, 2013.
  27. UNE-EN 1097-3:1999; Ensayos para Determinar las Propiedades Mecánicas y Físicas de los Áridos. Parte 3: Determinación de la Densidad Aparente y la Porosidad. AENOR: Madrid, Spain, 1999.
  28. UNE-EN 196-3:2017; Métodos de Ensayo de Cementos. Parte 3: Determinación del Tiempo de Fraguado y de la Estabilidad de Volumen. AENOR: Madrid, Spain, 2017.
  29. UNE-EN 196-2:2014; Métodos de Ensayo de Cementos. Parte 2: Análisis Químico de Cementos. AENOR: Madrid, Spain, 2014.
  30. UNE-EN 196-5:2011; Métodos de Ensayo de Cementos. Parte 5: Ensayo de Puzolanicidad para los Cementos Puzolánicos. AENOR: Madrid, Spain, 2011.
  31. UNE-EN 196-1:2018; Métodos de Ensayo de Cementos. Parte 1: Determinación de Resistencias. AENOR: Madrid, Spain, 2018.
  32. UNE-EN ISO 16810; Ensayos no Destructivos. Ensayos por Ultrasonidos. Principios Generales. AENOR: Madrid, Spain, 2014.
  33. Galán, E.; Aparicio, P.; Fernández-Caliani, J.C.; Miras, A.; Márquez, M.G.; Fallick, A.E.; Clauer, N. New insights on mineralogy and genesis of kaolin deposits: The Burela kaolin deposit (Northwestern Spain). Appl. Clay Sci. 2016, 131, 14–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Obada, D.O.; Dodoo-Arhin, D.; Dauda, M.; Anafi, F.O.; Ahmed, A.S.; Ajayi, O.A. The impact of kaolin dehydroxylation on the porosity and mechanical integrity of kaolin based ceramics using different pore formers. Results Phys. 2017, 7, 2718–2727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Drzal, L.T.; Rynd, J.; Fort, T. Effects of calcination on the surface properties of kaolinite. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1983, 93, 126–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Saikia, N.; Bharali, D.; Sengupta, P.; Bordoloi, D.; Goswamee, R.; Saikia, P.; Borthakur, P. Characterization, beneficiation and utilization of a kaolinite clay from Assam, India. Appl. Clay Sci. 2003, 24, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Galán, E.; Ferrell, R. Genesis of Clay Minerals. Dev. Clay Sci. 2013, 5, 83–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Çolak, A. Characteristics of pastes from a Portland cement containing different amounts of natural pozzolan. Cem. Concr. Res. 2003, 33, 585–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mboya, H.A.; King’ondu, C.K.; Njau, K.N.; Mrema, A.L. Measurement of Pozzolanic Activity Index of Scoria, Pumice, and Rice Husk Ash as Potential Supplementary Cementitious Materials for Portland Cement. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2017, 2017, 6952645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Turanli, L.; Uzal, B.; Bektas, F. Effect of material characteristics on the properties of blended cements containing high volumes of natural pozzolans. Cem. Concr. Res. 2004, 34, 2277–2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Aguilar, R.A.; Díaz, O.B.; García, J.E. Lightweight concretes of activated metakaolin-fly ash binders, with blast furnace slag aggregates. Constr. Build. Mater. 2010, 24, 1166–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Costa, L.M.; Almeida, N.G.S.; Houmard, M.; Cetlin, P.R.; Silva, G.J.B.; Aguilar, M.T.P. Influence of the addition of amorphous and crystalline silica on the structural properties of metakaolin-based geopolymers. Appl. Clay Sci. 2021, 215, 106312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tironi, A.; Trezza, M.A.; Scian, A.N.; Irassar, E.F. Assessment of pozzolanic activity of different calcined clays. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2013, 37, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sabir, B.; Wild, S.; Bai, J. Metakaolin and calcined clays as pozzolans for concrete: A review. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2001, 23, 441–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tantawy, M. Characterization and pozzolanic properties of calcined alum sludge. Mater. Res. Bull. 2015, 61, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fernandez, R.; Martirena, F.; Scrivener, K.L. The origin of the pozzolanic activity of calcined clay minerals: A comparison between kaolinite, illite and montmorillonite. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Harvey, O.R.; Harris, J.P.; Herbert, B.E.; Stiffler, E.A.; Haney, S.P. Natural organic matter and the formation of calcium-silicate-hydrates in lime-stabilized smectites: A thermal analysis study. Thermochim. Acta 2010, 505, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zheng, K. Pozzolanic reaction of glass powder and its role in controlling alkali–silica reaction. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2016, 67, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Oertel, T.; Helbig, U.; Hutter, F.; Kletti, H.; Sextl, G. Influence of amorphous silica on the hydration in ultra-high performance concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 2014, 58, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Reina-Leal, C.R.; Ramirez, C.S.; Colmenares, J.E. Influence of the Organic Matter Content on the soil water retention characteristics of a reconstituted kaolinitic clay. Jpn. Geotech. Soc. Spéc. Publ. 2019, 7, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Bilim, C. Properties of cement mortars containing clinoptilolite as a supplementary cementitious material. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 3175–3180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Costafreda, J.L.; Martín, D.A.; Presa, L.; Parra, J.L. Altered Volcanic Tuffs from Los Frailes Caldera. A Study of Their Pozzolanic Properties. Molecules 2021, 26, 5348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Siddique, R. Effect of volcanic ash on the properties of cement paste and mortar. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2011, 56, 66–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, M.; Hu, Y.; Lai, Z.; Yan, T.; He, X.; Wu, J.; Lu, Z.; Lv, S. Influence of various bentonites on the mechanical properties and impermeability of cement mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 241, 118015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Presa, L.; Rosado, S.; Peña, C.; Martín, D.A.; Costafreda, J.L.; Astudillo, B.; Parra, J.L. Volcanic Ash from the Island of La Palma, Spain: An Experimental Study to Establish Their Properties as Pozzolans. Processes 2023, 11, 657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Martín, D.A.; Costafreda, J.L.; Costafreda, J.L.; Presa, L. Improving the Performance of Mortars Made from Recycled Aggregates by the Addition of Zeolitised Cineritic Tuff. Crystals 2022, 12, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rosado, S.; Costafreda, J.; Martín, D.; Presa, L.; Gullón, L. Recycled Aggregates from Ceramic and Concrete in Mortar Mixes: A Study of Their Mechanical Properties. Materials 2022, 15, 8933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Presa, L.; Costafreda, J.L.; Martín, D.A. Correlation between Uniaxial Compression Test and Ultrasonic Pulse Rate in Cement with Different Pozzolanic Additions. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Camara, L.A.; Wons, M.; Esteves, I.C.; Medeiros-Junior, R.A. Monitoring the Self-healing of Concrete from the Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity. J. Compos. Sci. 2019, 3, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Hong, G.; Oh, S.; Choi, S.; Chin, W.-J.; Kim, Y.-J.; Song, C. Correlation between the Compressive Strength and Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity of Cement Mortars Blended with Silica Fume: An Analysis of Microstructure and Hydration Kinetics. Materials 2021, 14, 2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Estévez, E.; Martín, D.A.; Argiz, C.; Sanjuán, M. Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity—Compressive Strength Relationship for Portland Cement Mortars Cured at Different Conditions. Crystals 2020, 10, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of the research area [24].
Figure 1. Location of the research area [24].
Buildings 13 01647 g001
Figure 2. Natural kaolinitic clay (NKC) sample appearance.
Figure 2. Natural kaolinitic clay (NKC) sample appearance.
Buildings 13 01647 g002
Figure 3. Microphotographs taken from samples of natural kaolinitic clays in (NKC) (a,b) and later after being calcined (CKC) (c,d).
Figure 3. Microphotographs taken from samples of natural kaolinitic clays in (NKC) (a,b) and later after being calcined (CKC) (c,d).
Buildings 13 01647 g003
Figure 4. Granulometric distribution obtained by granulometric analysis of natural kaolinitic clay samples; (a) NKC-01 and (b) NKC-02.
Figure 4. Granulometric distribution obtained by granulometric analysis of natural kaolinitic clay samples; (a) NKC-01 and (b) NKC-02.
Buildings 13 01647 g004
Figure 5. Evolution of the pozzolanic behavior of the samples of kaolinitic clays in natural state (a) and calcined (b) analyzed at 8 days and 15 days.
Figure 5. Evolution of the pozzolanic behavior of the samples of kaolinitic clays in natural state (a) and calcined (b) analyzed at 8 days and 15 days.
Buildings 13 01647 g005
Figure 6. Mechanical behavior of samples of mortar specimens made with natural kaolinitic clay (NKC) at 7, 28, and 90 days.
Figure 6. Mechanical behavior of samples of mortar specimens made with natural kaolinitic clay (NKC) at 7, 28, and 90 days.
Buildings 13 01647 g006
Figure 7. Results of the tests of mechanical resistance to compression obtained from the study of specimens made with calcined kaolinitic clay (CKC) at 7, 28, and 90 days.
Figure 7. Results of the tests of mechanical resistance to compression obtained from the study of specimens made with calcined kaolinitic clay (CKC) at 7, 28, and 90 days.
Buildings 13 01647 g007
Table 1. Design of dosages of mixtures of natural kaolinite clay (NKC) and calcined clay (CKC) partially replacing Portland cement (PC).
Table 1. Design of dosages of mixtures of natural kaolinite clay (NKC) and calcined clay (CKC) partially replacing Portland cement (PC).
SampleProportion (Ratios)Temperature of
Calcination
(°C)
NKC 1/CKC 2:PC 3
(%)
NS 4
(g)
DW 5
(g)
RMS *PC:1001350225-
NKC-01-1010:90-
NKC-01-2525:75-
NKC-01-4040:60-
CKC-01-1010:90800
CKC-01-2525:75800
CKC-01-4040:60800
NKC-02-1010:90-
NKC-02-2525:75-
NKC-02-4040:60-
CKC-02-1010:90800
CKC-02-2525:75800
CKC-02-4040:60800
1 Natural kaolinite; 2 Calcined kaolinite; 3 Portland cement; 4 Normalized sand; 5 Demineralized water. * Reference mortar sample.
Table 2. Results of chemical analyses obtained by X-ray fluorescence (XRF).
Table 2. Results of chemical analyses obtained by X-ray fluorescence (XRF).
SampleCompounds in % Weight
SiO2Al2O3Fe2O3CaOTiO2SO3K2OMgOP2O5Na2OClLOI *
NKC-0149.931.52.51.90.430.170.80.340.130.00.0112.0
NKC-0251.033.51.00.30.270.560.540.230.080.00.012.1
PC 117.475.573.3964.010.334.01.390.640.070.09-2.41
* Loss on ignition; 1 Portland cement.
Table 3. Details of the results of the granulometric analysis performed on the samples of natural kaolinitic clays NKC-01 and NKC-02.
Table 3. Details of the results of the granulometric analysis performed on the samples of natural kaolinitic clays NKC-01 and NKC-02.
SampleSize
(µm)
Retained
(%)
Passing Through
(%)
Percentage
(%)
Size
(µm)
(B.P.F.) 1
(cm2/g)
NKC-013226.373.7446101.3526643
4523.276.8439507.309
6320.579.497363.213.859
9018.081.984590221.703
NKC-023217.182.8706101.2157640
4514.685.4088505.699
6312.587.549463.29.207
9010.689.375490104.952
Sample NKC-01Sample NKC-02
Type of distribution: volumeType of distribution: volume
Average diameter D[4,3]: 56.159 μmAverage diameter D[4,3]: 37.716 μm
Distribution width (10–90%)/50%: 30.150Distribution width (10–90%)/50%: 18.204
Mode: 4.551 μmMode: 4.371 μm
1 Blaine particle fineness.
Table 4. Results of the calculation of the real density, apparent density, and porosity of the samples of natural kaolinitic clays NKC-01 and NKC-02.
Table 4. Results of the calculation of the real density, apparent density, and porosity of the samples of natural kaolinitic clays NKC-01 and NKC-02.
SampleMass
(g)
Volume
(cm3)
R.D.1
(g/cm3)
A.D 2
(g/cm3)
Porosity
(%)
NKC-011057.232,740.1720.913
NKC-021058.762,730.1730.911
1 Real density; 2 Apparent density.
Table 5. Results of the volume stability test and the start and final setting time of the samples of natural kaolinitic clays (NKC) and calcined clays (CKC).
Table 5. Results of the volume stability test and the start and final setting time of the samples of natural kaolinitic clays (NKC) and calcined clays (CKC).
SampleVolume Stability
(mm)
Start and Final Setting Time
A 1C 2C-AStart
(min)
Final
(min)
RMS 3000170230
NKC-01-10 4011160205
NKC-01-25011180225
NKC-01-40001230275
NKC-02-10000155215
NKC-02-25011160225
NKC-02-400.50.50210225
CKC-01-10 5330165200
CKC-01-25000180215
CKC-01-40011190225
CKC-02-10000135205
CKC-02-25000150215
CKC-02-40000155220
1 Distance measured between the tips of the needles after resting the Le Chatelier equipment for 24 h ± 30 min at 20 ± 1 °C in the wet chamber; 2 Distance measured between the tips of the needles after allowing the Le Chatelier equipment to cool to room temperature; 3 Reference mortar sample; 4 Natural diatomite at 40, 25 and 10%; 5 Calcined diatomite at 40, 25 and 10%.
Table 6. Results of the chemical composition and pozzolanic quality of the samples.
Table 6. Results of the chemical composition and pozzolanic quality of the samples.
CompoundsNKC-01 1
(%)
CKC-01 2
(%)
NKC-02
(%)
CKC-02
(%)
Limit Allowed *
(%)
Total SiO252.3957.4150.9758.10-
Reactive SiO235.8444.3634.9947.81>25
Total CaO0.210.480.390.53-
Reactive CaO0.00.390.030.47-
Al2O331.8036.0531.5635.84<16
MgO0.190.490.150.12<5
Fe2O31.241.530.611.06-
SO30.010.010.010.01<4
Humidity2.33-2.24--
IR 324.5915.6223.3515.82<3
LOI 411.570.3311.900.35-
Cl 50.00.00.00.0<0.1
SiO2/(CaO + MgO)130.959.1894.3889.38>3.5
1 Natural kaolinite; 2 Calcined kaolinite; 3 Insoluble residue; 4 Loss on ignition; 5 Chlorides; * [26].
Table 8. Ultrasonic wave propagation time (UWPT) and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) of the samples.
Table 8. Ultrasonic wave propagation time (UWPT) and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) of the samples.
SamplesUWPT 1
(µs)
UPV 2
(km/s)
RMS36.334.40
NKC 1-01-1036.734.36
NKC-01-2539.204.08
NKC-01-4041.473.86
CKC 2-01-1037.804.23
CKC-01-2539.304.07
CKC-01-4040.133.99
NKC-02-1037.574.26
NKC-02-2539.634.04
NKC-02-4041.403.86
CKC-02-1036.834.34
CKC-02-2538.634.14
CKC-02-4040.503.95
1 Ultrasonic wave propagation time; 2 Value of Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity calculated.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Astudillo, B.; Martín, D.A.; Costafreda, J.L.; Presa, L.; Sanjuán, M.A.; Parra, J.L. Improvement of the Mechanical Properties of Mortars Manufactured with Partial Substitution of Portland Cement by Kaolinitic Clays. Buildings 2023, 13, 1647. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071647

AMA Style

Astudillo B, Martín DA, Costafreda JL, Presa L, Sanjuán MA, Parra JL. Improvement of the Mechanical Properties of Mortars Manufactured with Partial Substitution of Portland Cement by Kaolinitic Clays. Buildings. 2023; 13(7):1647. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071647

Chicago/Turabian Style

Astudillo, Beatriz, Domingo A. Martín, Jorge L. Costafreda, Leticia Presa, Miguel A. Sanjuán, and José Luis Parra. 2023. "Improvement of the Mechanical Properties of Mortars Manufactured with Partial Substitution of Portland Cement by Kaolinitic Clays" Buildings 13, no. 7: 1647. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071647

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop