Next Article in Journal
Numerical Analysis of the Factors Influencing the Erosion of the Valve Port of a High-Speed On/Off Valve
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength and Microleakage of Three Ion-Releasing Restorative Materials at Various pH Levels
Previous Article in Journal
Automatic Transmission Fluids in Electrified Transmissions: Compatibility with Elastomers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study of the Intra-Coronal Pressure Generated by Internal Bleaching Agents and Its Influence on Temporary Restoration
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Torsional Fracture Resistance of Niti Rotary Glide Path Files under Flexural Stress

1
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Kyung Hee University Medical Center Dental Hospital, 23 Kyungheedaero, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Korea
2
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry, 23 Kyungheedaero, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Korea
3
Daehwa Appletree Dental Clinic, 1573 Jungang-ro, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang-si 10381, Korea
4
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, 23 Kyungheedaero, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Korea
5
Division of Restorative Dentistry, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A3K7, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(12), 6214; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12126214
Submission received: 25 May 2022 / Revised: 13 June 2022 / Accepted: 16 June 2022 / Published: 18 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Restorative and Endodontic Materials for Clinical Dentistry)

Abstract

:
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of flexural stress on the torsional fracture resistance of NiTi glide path files. PathFile #16/02, RaCe #15/04, RaCe Evo #15/04, HyFlex EDM #15/03, TruNatomy Glider #17/02, and V Taper 2H #17/04 were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (n = 3/brand) and subjected to differential scanning calorimetry (n = 2/brand). Torsional fracture resistance testing was performed in straight (ISO 3630-1) and flexural modes (n = 15/brand/mode). Flexural mode testing involved instruments rotating within a stainless-steel artificial double-curved canal. Ultimate strength and distortion angle until failure were recorded, and fractured instruments were examined by SEM. Statistical analyses involved independent sample t-test and one-way analysis of variance with Games–Howell pots hoc test. Austenitic transformation- finishing temperatures of heat-treated files were above body temperature. For RaCe Evo, HyFlex EDM, TruNatomy Glider, and V Taper 2H, the flexural mode resulted in a significantly higher distortion angle compared to the straight mode (p < 0.05). The maximum torque of RaCe Evo, HyFlex EDM increased with the flexural stress (p < 0.05). V taper 2H showed the highest distortion angle and ultimate strength. SEM showed typical patterns of torsional fracture for all tested files. The flexural stress positively affected distortion angle of heat-treated NiTi glide path files.

1. Introduction

Nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary files enable faster and more efficient root canal shaping [1] and maintain original canal anatomy better than manual preparation, even when obtaining glide path [2,3]. NiTi rotary glide path file usage prior to canal shaping preserves original canal anatomy and reduces risks of transportation and stresses generated by NiTi shaping files [2,4,5].
The NiTi rotary files initially available for glide path preparation, such as PathFile (Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland), have a small diameter and taper to reach the apical canal. Then, manufacturers developed NiTi glide path files with heat treatments that increase flexibility and resistance to fracture, and files with various designs. A recently released heat-treated file system, TruNatomy (Dentsply Sirona), is suitable for minimally invasive root canal preparation. TruNatomy Glider has a variable taper that averages 2%, with tip size of #17 [6].
The NiTi alloy is composed of nickel and titanium with an equi-atomic ratio [7]. The NiTi alloy can exist in different crystal structures depending on temperature, i.e., austenite and martensite [7,8]. The martensitic phase of the NiTi alloy has lower Young’s modulus and yield strength compared to those of austenitic phase of the NiTi alloy [7]. Namely, martensite is easily deformed and is soft and ductile [7,8]. Conventional NiTi files mainly consist of austenite and exhibit superelasticity, which allows deformation of 8% strain to be recoverable [7,8].
NiTi files made from a thermo-mechanically treated alloy, Controlled Memory (CM) wire, do not possess superelastic properties. CM wire files contain some martensite at room temperature [8], which have demonstrated remarkable flexibility [9,10]. These include V Taper 2H (SS White, Lakewood, CA, USA) and HyFlex EDM (Coltene-Whaledent, Altstätten, Switzerland) [10]. HyFlex EDM files produced by electrical discharge machining of CM wire exhibited superior resistance to cyclic fatigue fracture [11]. HyFlex EDM glide path files are available in sizes #10/05 and #15/03, and the latter released more recently has had limited assessment of its mechanical properties.
Heat treatments with electropolishing during manufacturing produce blue surfaces with enhanced properties, as in RaCe Evo (FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) [12]. However, the torsional fracture resistance of RaCe Evo glide path files has not been compared to original RaCe (FKG Dentaire).
When the instrument’s tip becomes tightly bound within a canal and the handpiece continues to rotate beyond the maximum strain it can withstand, torsional fracture occurs [13]. Testing torsional resistance in vitro according to ISO 3630-1 involves immobilizing 3 mm of the instrument’s tip, while rotating the shaft continuously until fracture [14]. Although these tests are performed on straight instruments, actual canals are curved, and instruments resist both torsional and bending stresses simultaneously.
This study aimed to compare NiTi rotary glide path file’s design, phase transformation behavior, and torsional fracture resistance under flexural stress for six brands.

2. Materials and Methods

PathFile (tip size #16, 2% taper), RaCe (tip size #15, 4% taper), RaCe Evo (tip size #15, 4% taper), HyFlex EDM (tip size #15, 3% taper), TruNatomy Glider (tip size #17, variable 2% taper), and V Taper 2H (tip size #17, variable 4% taper) instruments (n = 35/brand) were obtained. PathFile, RaCe, RaCe Evo, and HyFlex EDM have a constant taper, whereas TruNatomy Glider and V Taper 2H possess a variable taper. PathFile, HyFlex EDM, and TruNatomy Glider have square cross-sectional shape, while RaCe, RaCe Evo, and V Taper 2H demonstrate triangular cross-sectional shape.

2.1. Instrument Design

New unused instruments (n = 3/brand) were carefully examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM; S-4700, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan, ×30 magnification). Surface features were observed, and the pitch length and helix angles were measured with Image J software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).

2.2. Phase Transformation Behavior

Unused instruments (n = 2/brand) were subjected to differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), which demonstrated their phase transformation behavior. Each instrument tip (4 mm) was sealed in an aluminum cell and DSC analysis performed (DSC250, TA instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). Sample was heated from 25 °C to 90 °C, then cooled to −90 °C, and heated again to 90 °C at 10 °C/min. The DSC curve was used to determine phase transformation temperatures.

2.3. Torsional Fracture Resistance

Instruments (n = 30/brand) were subjected to torsional fracture tests in either straight (n = 15/brand) or flexural mode (n = 15/brand) using a universal testing machine (UTM; Universal Mechanics Analyzer, IB systems, Seoul, Korea). This consisted of a torque sensor, an upper chuck connected to a reversible geared motor, and a lower chuck with a staging platform (Figure 1A,B).
Torsional testing in the straight mode was performed according to ISO3630-1. Each instrument’s tip (3 mm) was clamped into a lower chuck with brass jaws that prevented sliding (Figure 1A). The instrument’s shaft was clamped into the upper chuck and rotated (2 rpm) clockwise continuously until fracture.
Torsional testing in flexural mode was performed with the UTM using a stainless-steel jig that simulated root canal with a double curvature (135°) (Figure 1B). The jig contained two stainless-steel components with prepared grooves on their inner surfaces that created an artificial root canal when joined with screws (Figure 1B,C). The apical curve of the canal was positioned 6 mm from each instrument’s tip (3 mm in the metal jig + 3 mm in the lower chuck), and the coronal curve was located 3.3 mm vertically from the apical curvature (Figure 1C,D). The internal diameter of the artificial canal (1 mm) allowed unimpeded rotation of the instrument without binding. Each instrument’s tip (3 mm) was clamped in the lower chuck, and the staging platform was repositioned laterally such that the longitudinal axis of the instrument was perpendicular to the plane. The instrument’s shaft was clamped into the upper chuck and rotated (2 rpm) clockwise continuously until fracture. Rotation angles and torque values were measured in real-time with a torque sensor contained in the UTM and recorded automatically by a software program installed in a notebook connected to the UTM. The ultimate strength and angular distortion at failure were recorded.
After torsional resistance tests, the fractured and lateral surfaces of the instruments were examined under SEM (Teneo VS, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) to identify patterns (×100, ×1000 and ×5000 magnifications).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

For torsional fracture resistance testing, a priori sample size calculation was performed to determine effect size, using results from a previous study [15]. Analysis of variance was selected from the F test family using an alpha type error of 0.05 and a power beta of 0.95 (G*Power for Windows v3.1; Heinrich Heine, Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany). A minimum of 12 samples/group were required to observe the same effect (3.07) [15]. Therefore, sample size was set to 15/group.
Torsional fracture resistance testing data were verified for normality by the Shapiro–Wilk test. Homogeneity of variances between instrument brands was not satisfied by Levene’s test. Therefore, one-way analysis of variance was followed by Games–Howell post hoc tests. Differences in the torsional fracture resistance between straight and flexural test modes for each instrument brand were evaluated by independent sample t-test. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 25 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), and the p-value set at 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Instrument Design

SEM revealed surface features on unused instruments (Figure 2). RaCe and RaCe Evo had markedly longer pitch length, and alternating long and short pitch length, which distinguishes them from the other instruments (Figure 2B,C). PathFile, HyFlex EDM, and V Taper 2H had similar pitch length in their apical 4 mm regions (Figure 2A,D,F). HyFlex EDM showed longer pitch length, followed by V Taper 2H and PathFile in the middle 4 mm region (Figure 2A,D,F). TruNatomy Glider had the shortest pitch length in both middle and apical regions (Figure 2E). All instruments except PathFile showed longer pitch length in the middle region compared to the apical region. Helix angles were measured at the cutting edge located around 3 mm from instrument tip. Helix angles of PathFile, HyFlex EDM, TruNatomy Glider and V Taper 2H were 16.9°, 15.9°, 20.9° and 20.5°, respectively. Helix angles of RaCe and RaCe Evo were alternately 11.5° and 16.0° for both instruments. The lateral surface of PathFile showed milling mark and metal rollover (Figure 2A), TruNatomy Glider showed milling mark (Figure 2E), and HyFlex EDM showed characteristic crater-like pattern without milling mark (Figure 2D). Whereas RaCe, RaCe Evo, and V Taper 2H demonstrated smooth, flawless surfaces (Figure 2B,C,F).

3.2. Phase Transformation Behavior

DSC plot of PathFile showed a single peak for the heating curve, and no distinct peak during cooling (Figure 3A). DSC plots of RaCe and HyFlex EDM showed single peaks in the heating and cooling curves, respectively (Figure 3B,D). RaCe Evo, TruNatomy Glider, and V Taper 2H had a single peak in heating, and double peaks during cooling, as austenite transformed to R-phase, then transformed to martensite (Figure 3C,E,F). As and Af in the heating curves and Ms, Mf, Rs and Rf in cooling curves were measured (Table 1).

3.3. Torsional Fracture Resistance

Ultimate strengths (N cm) were significantly higher (p < 0.001) under flexural stress than in straight mode for RaCe Evo and HyFlex EDM (Table 2). Distortion angles increased significantly (p < 0.001) under flexural stress for RaCe Evo, HyFlex EDM, TruNatomy Glider, and V Taper 2H but were not significantly different than in straight mode for PathFile and RaCe (Table 2).
When comparing between files, V Taper 2H showed the highest ultimate strength, and PathFile had the lowest in both test modes (Table 2). The ultimate strength of TruNatomy Glider was higher than those of PathFile and RaCe and lower than that of V Taper 2H.
The distortion angle was highest for V Taper 2H, followed by RaCe Evo and TruNatomy Glider in both test modes (Table 3). RaCe showed the lowest distortion angle in both test modes.
Graphs of the torque and distortion angle were plotted for representative samples in each group (Figure 4). As soon as the file was rotated, the torque increased in proportion to the distortion angle, which is regarded as elastic deformation, and the elastic limit of each file is marked in the graph. After that, the torque was found to increase unevenly, the decrease and increase were repeated, and the deformation between the elastic limit and failure point was regarded as plastic deformation. The amount of plastic deformation increased with the flexural stress (Figure 4).
SEM images of the lateral surface of the fractured files showed a typical ductile fracture pattern for the tested instruments (Figure 5). Circular abrasion marks were observed in the central area of the fractured surfaces for all the samples (Figure 6). There was no difference in the fractographic patterns in the microscopic images according to the test mode.

4. Discussion

In this study, the effect of flexural stress on the torsional resistance of NiTi glide path files was material dependent. PathFile and RaCe, which are manufactured without heat treatment, were not affected by flexural stress. In contrast, heat-treated NiTi files showed increased torsional resistance during flexural stress. RaCe Evo and HyFlex EDM showed significantly higher distortion angle and ultimate strength in flexural than straight modes. Similarly, TruNatomy Glider and V Taper 2H showed higher distortion angle under flexure. Although there was no significant difference, the mean ultimate strength of V Taper 2H was higher at straight mode compared to that of flexural mode (Table 2). The smooth, flawless surface of V Taper 2H might favorably act upon the ultimate strength in straight mode, yet further study is needed.
Larger distortion angles under flexural stress in heat-treated instruments can be attributed to their phase composition. While PathFile and RaCe consist of austenite, HyFlex EDM contain austenite and martensite (Figure 3A,B,D). RaCe Evo, TruNatomy Glider, and V Taper 2H are a mixed state of austenite, martensite, and R-phase (Figure 3C,E,F). When torsional fracture resistance testing was performed in flexural mode, V Taper 2H, RaCe Evo, and TruNatomy Glider, which possess some martensite and R-phase at room temperature, showed larger distortion angles than other files. The elastic modulus of R-phase is lower than martensite, which is lower than that of austenite [10]. Therefore, instruments containing martensite and R-phase can deform more readily under flexural stress. Indeed, charting of torque with distortion angle (Figure 4) showed that increased distortion angles from flexural stress involved plastic deformation, which are a warning sign for torsional fracture of the instrument. The mean distortion angle of RaCe was higher for straight mode compared to that of flexural mode, although the difference was not statistically significant (Table 3). The smooth, electropolished surface and alternating pitch length of RaCe might have affected the distortion angle in straight mode, yet further research is needed.
In this study V Taper 2H showed the highest distortion angle and ultimate strength. This instrument’s large diameter at 3 mm from the tip (D3), relatively short pitch length, and metallurgical properties contributed to the highest torsional fracture resistance. Estimated D3 size was largest for V Taper 2H (0.29 mm), followed by RaCe and RaCe Evo (0.27 mm), HyFlex EDM (0.24 mm), TruNatomy Glider (0.23 mm), and PathFile (0.22 mm). PathFile and RaCe, manufactured from conventional NiTi alloy, showed lower ultimate strength than those of heat-treated instruments, which agrees with previous reports that manufacturing method and metal mass affect torsional strength [14,15].
The ultimate strength of TruNatomy Glider was higher than PathFile, and comparable to HyFlex EDM or RaCe Evo, which have larger D3 than TruNatomy glider. However, TruNatomy Glider had the shortest pitch length (Figure 2E), and thereby a greater number of threads than other instruments. More threads as well as square cross-sectional design ensured that TruNatomy Glider withstood torsional load despite its small diameter. This agrees with previous reports that NiTi files with more threads [16,17,18,19], and instruments with larger core mass and square cross sections had higher torsional resistance [15,20].
In contrast to flexural mode, for torsional resistance in straight mode, there were no significant differences in the distortion angles between PathFile, made from conventional NiTi alloy, and HyFlex EDM or TruNatomy Glider that are heat-treated instruments. PathFile exhibited superior flexibility in the 3–6 mm portion of the instrument due to smaller taper (2%), and more threads in the middle portion (Figure 2). Indeed, multiple factors including diameter, pitch length, and heat treatment affect distortion angles of NiTi glide path files [14,15,21,22].
This study’s limitation is that although instruments have different size and taper, the same artificial double-curved root canal was utilized. PathFile and TruNatomy Glider with small taper had less severe instrument bending within the canal. Furthermore, these torsional fracture resistance tests were performed at room temperature, and previous studies reported decreased cyclic fatigue resistance of conventional NiTi files that had Af below body temperature [23,24]. These limitations need to be addressed in further studies.
In conclusion, the NiTi rotary glide path file ultimate strength was unaffected, and the heat-treated instruments’ angular distortion actually increased under flexural stress. V Taper 2H that are manufactured from heat-treated CM-wire demonstrated the highest resistance to torsional fracture.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.O. and S.W.C.; Methodology, S.O., J.-H.P., H.-J.K. (Hye-Jeong Kim) and E.S.; Software, H.-J.K. (Hyun-Jung Kim); Validation, H.P. and J.-Y.W.; Formal Analysis, S.O. and K.-K.C.; Investigation, H.-J.K. (Hyun-Jung Kim), H.-J.K. (Hye-Jeong Kim) and J.-Y.W.; Resources, S.W.C.; Data Curation, J.-H.P. and E.S.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, S.O., J.-H.P., H.-J.K. (Hye-Jeong Kim), E.S. and J.-Y.W.; Writing-Review & Editing, H.-J.K. (Hyun-Jung Kim), H.P., K.-K.C. and S.W.C.; Visualization, H.-J.K. (Hyun-Jung Kim), H.P.; Supervision, S.W.C. and K.-K.C.; Project Administration, S.O. and J.-H.P.; Funding Acquisition, S.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation (NRF) of the Republic of Korea (NRF-2021R1G1A1006751).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Celik, D.; Taşdemir, T.; Er, K. Comparative study of 6 rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. J. Endod. 2013, 39, 278–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yilmaz, O.S. “Glide path” in endodontics. Turk. Endod. J. 2021, 6, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Paleker, F.; van der Vyver, P.J. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of k-files, ProGlider file, and G-files: A micro-computed tomography study of curved root canals. J. Endod. 2016, 42, 1105–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Abu-Tahun, I.H.; Kwak, S.W.; Ha, J.H.; Sigurdsson, A.; Kayahan, M.B.; Kim, H.C. Effective establishment of glide-path to reduce torsional stress during nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation. Materials 2019, 12, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Berutti, E.; Paolino, D.S.; Chiandussi, G.; Alovisi, M.; Cantatore, G.; Castellucci, A.; Pasqualini, D. Root canal anatomy preservation of WaveOne reciprocating files with or without glide path. J. Endod. 2012, 38, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Morales, M.L.N.P.; Sánchez, J.A.G.; Olivieri, J.G.; Elmsmari, F.; Salmon, P.; Jaramillo, D.E.; Terol, F.D.-S. Micro-computed tomographic assessment and comparative study of the shaping ability of 6 nickel-titanium files: An in vitro study. J. Endod. 2021, 47, 812–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhou, H.; Peng, B.; Zheng, Y.F. An overview of the mechanical properties of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. Endod. Top. 2013, 29, 42–54. Available online: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/etp.12045 (accessed on 1 January 2022). [CrossRef]
  8. Zupanc, J.; Vahdat-Pajouh, N.; Schäfer, E. New thermomechanically treated NiTi alloys—A review. Int. Endod. J. 2018, 51, 1088–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Shen, Y.; Qian, W.; Abtin, H.; Gao, Y.; Haapasalo, M. Fatigue testing of controlled memory wire nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J. Endod. 2011, 37, 997–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chang, S.W.; Shim, K.S.; Kim, Y.C.; Jee, K.K.; Zhu, Q.; Perinpanayagam, H.; Kum, K.K. Cyclic fatigue resistance, torsional resistance, and metallurgical characteristics of V taper 2 and V taper 2H rotary NiTi files. Scanning 2016, 38, 564–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Goo, H.J.; Kwak, S.W.; Ha, J.H.; Pedullà, E.; Kim, H.C. Mechanical properties of various heat-treated nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J. Endod. 2017, 43, 1872–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. RaCe Evo Switzerland: FKG Dentaire, SA. 2020. Available online: https://www.fkg.ch/sites/default/files/FKG_RACE%20EVO_Brochure_EN_WEB_202006.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  13. McGuigan, M.B.; Louca, C.; Duncan, H.F. Endodontic instrument fracture: Causes and prevention. Br. Dent. J. 2013, 214, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sivas Yilmaz, Ö.; Keskin, C.; Aydemir, H. Comparison of the torsional resistance of 4 different glide path instruments. J. Endod. 2021, 47, 970–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. İnan, U.; Keskin, C. Torsional resistance of ProGlider, Hyflex EDM, and One G glide path instruments. J. Endod. 2019, 45, 1253–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. He, R.; Ni, J. Design improvement and failure reduction of endodontic files through finite element analysis: Application to V-Taper file designs. J. Endod. 2010, 36, 1552–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Elnaghy, A.M.; Elsaka, S.E.; Elshazli, A.H. Dynamic cyclic and torsional fatigue resistance of TruNatomy compared with different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Aust. Endod. J. 2020, 46, 226–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Oh, S.; Kum, K.Y.; Cho, K.; Lee, S.H.; You, S.H.; Go, J.; Jeon, B.K.; Kim, S.W.; Kim, T.H.; Jang, J.H.; et al. Torsional and bending properties of V Taper 2H, ProTaper NEXT, NRT, and One Shape. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 6368958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Al Raeesi, D.; Kwak, S.W.; Ha, J.H.; Sulaiman, S.; El Abed, R.; Kim, H.C. Mechanical properties of glide path preparation instruments with different pitch lengths. J. Endod. 2018, 44, 864–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Baek, S.H.; Lee, C.J.; Versluis, A.; Kim, B.M.; Lee, W.; Kim, H.C. Comparison of torsional stiffness of nickel-titanium rotary files with different geometric characteristics. J. Endod. 2011, 37, 1283–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Silva, E.; Giraldes, J.F.N.; de Lima, C.O.; Vieira, V.T.L.; Elias, C.N.; Antunes, H.S. Influence of heat treatment on torsional resistance and surface roughness of nickel-titanium instruments. Int. Endod. J. 2019, 52, 1645–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nishijo, M.; Ebihara, A.; Tokita, D.; Doi, H.; Hanawa, T.; Okiji, T. Evaluation of selected mechanical properties of NiTi rotary glide path files manufactured from controlled memory wires. Dent. Mater. J. 2018, 37, 549–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. De Vasconcelos, R.A.; Murphy, S.; Carvalho, C.A.; Govindjee, R.G.; Govindjee, S.; Peters, O.A. Evidence for reduced fatigue resistance of contemporary rotary instruments exposed to body temperature. J. Endod. 2016, 42, 782–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Arias, A.; Macorra, J.C.; Govindjee, S.; Peters, O.A. Correlation between temperature-dependent fatigue resistance and differential scanning calorimetry analysis for 2 contemporary rotary instruments. J. Endod. 2018, 44, 630–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Apparatus for testing NiTi files. (A) Torsional testing in straight mode, according to ISO 3630-1. (B) Torsional testing in flexural mode, by using two opposing stainless-steel jigs (red box) with artificial double-curved canal. (C) Internal surface of stainless-steel jig showing artificial root canal (red box). (D) A schematic diagram of the artificial root canal.
Figure 1. Apparatus for testing NiTi files. (A) Torsional testing in straight mode, according to ISO 3630-1. (B) Torsional testing in flexural mode, by using two opposing stainless-steel jigs (red box) with artificial double-curved canal. (C) Internal surface of stainless-steel jig showing artificial root canal (red box). (D) A schematic diagram of the artificial root canal.
Applsci 12 06214 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of unused NiTi rotary glide path files. Coronal flutes (left images, ~5–9 mm from tip) and apical cutting surfaces (right images, ~0–4 mm of tip) of PathFile (A), RaCe (B), RaCe Evo (C), HyFlex EDM (D), TruNatomy Glider (E), and V Taper 2H (F), are shown (×30 magnification).
Figure 2. SEM images of unused NiTi rotary glide path files. Coronal flutes (left images, ~5–9 mm from tip) and apical cutting surfaces (right images, ~0–4 mm of tip) of PathFile (A), RaCe (B), RaCe Evo (C), HyFlex EDM (D), TruNatomy Glider (E), and V Taper 2H (F), are shown (×30 magnification).
Applsci 12 06214 g002
Figure 3. DSC plots of tested new files. (A) PathFile; (B) RaCe; (C) RaCe Evo; (D) HyFlex EDM; (E) TruNatomy Glider; (F) V Taper 2H. As and Af, Austenitic transformation starting and finishing temperatures; Rs and Rf, R-phase transformation starting and finishing temperatures; Ms and Mf, Martensitic transformation starting and finishing temperatures.
Figure 3. DSC plots of tested new files. (A) PathFile; (B) RaCe; (C) RaCe Evo; (D) HyFlex EDM; (E) TruNatomy Glider; (F) V Taper 2H. As and Af, Austenitic transformation starting and finishing temperatures; Rs and Rf, R-phase transformation starting and finishing temperatures; Ms and Mf, Martensitic transformation starting and finishing temperatures.
Applsci 12 06214 g003aApplsci 12 06214 g003b
Figure 4. Representative torque (N cm)-angle (degrees) curves from the torsional resistance test. The curves of each file brand were depicted in both straight mode and flexural mode. (A) PathFile; (B) RaCe; (C) RaCe Evo; (D) HyFlex EDM; (E) TruNatomy Glider; (F) V Taper 2H. An arrow indicates elastic limit in each test mode.
Figure 4. Representative torque (N cm)-angle (degrees) curves from the torsional resistance test. The curves of each file brand were depicted in both straight mode and flexural mode. (A) PathFile; (B) RaCe; (C) RaCe Evo; (D) HyFlex EDM; (E) TruNatomy Glider; (F) V Taper 2H. An arrow indicates elastic limit in each test mode.
Applsci 12 06214 g004
Figure 5. SEM images of the fractured instruments. Lateral surfaces of PathFile (A), RaCe (B), RaCe Evo (C), HyFlex EDM (D), TruNatomy Glider (E), and V Taper 2H (F), which fractured in straight mode. Lateral surfaces of PathFile (G), RaCe (H), RaCe Evo (I), HyFlex EDM (J), TruNatomy Glider (K), and V Taper 2H (L), which fractured in flexural mode. Plastic deformation included unwinding and overwinding of instruments (original magnification ×100).
Figure 5. SEM images of the fractured instruments. Lateral surfaces of PathFile (A), RaCe (B), RaCe Evo (C), HyFlex EDM (D), TruNatomy Glider (E), and V Taper 2H (F), which fractured in straight mode. Lateral surfaces of PathFile (G), RaCe (H), RaCe Evo (I), HyFlex EDM (J), TruNatomy Glider (K), and V Taper 2H (L), which fractured in flexural mode. Plastic deformation included unwinding and overwinding of instruments (original magnification ×100).
Applsci 12 06214 g005
Figure 6. SEM images of the fractured surfaces of instruments. The left two images in each row show fractured surface of instrument in straight mode and its magnified view of the central area; the right two images are fractured surface of instrument in flexural mode and its magnified view. (A) PathFile; (B) RaCe; (C) RaCe Evo; (D) HyFlex EDM; (E) TruNatomy Glider; (F) V Taper 2H (original magnification ×1000, ×5000).
Figure 6. SEM images of the fractured surfaces of instruments. The left two images in each row show fractured surface of instrument in straight mode and its magnified view of the central area; the right two images are fractured surface of instrument in flexural mode and its magnified view. (A) PathFile; (B) RaCe; (C) RaCe Evo; (D) HyFlex EDM; (E) TruNatomy Glider; (F) V Taper 2H (original magnification ×1000, ×5000).
Applsci 12 06214 g006
Table 1. Phase transformation temperatures from the DSC plots.
Table 1. Phase transformation temperatures from the DSC plots.
Heating CurveCooling Curve
AsAfRsRfMsMf
PathFile−16.630
Race3.8527.88 21.92−4.04
Race Evo12.0445.3737.5015.74−27.5−65.87
HyFlex EDM26.5450.1 42.3117.31
TruNatomy Glider10.5837.0230.968.65−34.23−64.04
V Taper 2H15.7744.3340.1912.21−20.38−45.87
As and Af, Austenitic transformation starting and finishing temperatures; Rs and Rf, R-phase transformation starting and finishing temperatures; Ms and Mf, Martensitic transformation starting and finishing temperatures.
Table 2. Instrument’s ultimate strength (N cm) from torsional fracture resistance testing in straight and flexural mode shown as mean (standard deviation).
Table 2. Instrument’s ultimate strength (N cm) from torsional fracture resistance testing in straight and flexural mode shown as mean (standard deviation).
PathFileRaCeRaCe EvoHyFlex EDMTruNatomy
Glider
V Taper 2H
Straight0.213 (0.030) a0.225 (0.039) a0.250 (0.060) a,b0.293
(0.051) b
0.285 (0.063) b0.404 (0.079) c
Flexural0.227 (0.024) a0.233 (0.056) a0.348 (0.055) b,c,*0.348
(0.019) b,c,*
0.307 (0.061) b0.397 (0.081) c
pvalue0.1880.706<0.001<0.0010.3550.827
p value calculated from independent sample t-test. Asterisk indicates significant difference between straight and flexural modes (p < 0.05). Different superscript letters indicate significant difference between instruments (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Instrument’s distortion angle (degrees) from torsional fracture resistance testing in straight and flexural mode shown as mean (standard deviation).
Table 3. Instrument’s distortion angle (degrees) from torsional fracture resistance testing in straight and flexural mode shown as mean (standard deviation).
PathFileRaCeRaCe EvoHyFlex EDMTruNatomy
Glider
V Taper 2H
Straight748.22 (82.68) b574.42 (85.29) a743.92 (122.61) b627.17 (47.32) a687.25 (45.08) b2036.76 (517.97) c
Flexural772.37 (68.98) b572.84 (99.6) a1003.34 (117.76) c,*755.04 (83.67) b,*938.55 (103.75) c,*2969.86 (831.34) d,*
pvalue0.2630.971<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
p value calculated from independent sample t-test. Asterisk indicates significant difference between straight and flexural modes (p < 0.05). Different superscript letters indicate significant difference between instruments (p < 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oh, S.; Park, J.-H.; Kim, H.-J.; Kim, H.-J.; Shim, E.; Woo, J.-Y.; Perinpanayagam, H.; Choi, K.-K.; Chang, S.W. Torsional Fracture Resistance of Niti Rotary Glide Path Files under Flexural Stress. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 6214. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12126214

AMA Style

Oh S, Park J-H, Kim H-J, Kim H-J, Shim E, Woo J-Y, Perinpanayagam H, Choi K-K, Chang SW. Torsional Fracture Resistance of Niti Rotary Glide Path Files under Flexural Stress. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(12):6214. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12126214

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oh, Soram, Ju-Hyo Park, Hyun-Jung Kim, Hye-Jeong Kim, Eurok Shim, Jee-Yeon Woo, Hiran Perinpanayagam, Kyung-Kyu Choi, and Seok Woo Chang. 2022. "Torsional Fracture Resistance of Niti Rotary Glide Path Files under Flexural Stress" Applied Sciences 12, no. 12: 6214. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12126214

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop