Next Article in Journal
Mechanism and Algorithm for Stable Trading Matching between Coal Mining and Power Generation Companies in China
Next Article in Special Issue
A Differential Subgrid Stress Model and Its Assessment in Large Eddy Simulations of Non-Premixed Turbulent Combustion
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Acoustic Emission Activity during Progressive Failure in Heterogeneous Materials: Experimental and Numerical Investigation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multiscale Analysis of Anisotropy of Reynolds Stresses, Subgrid Stresses and Dissipation in Statistically Planar Turbulent Premixed Flames
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Transition of Ignition Kernel Delay Time at the Early Stages of Lean Premixed n-Butane/Air Turbulent Spherical Flame Propagation

by
Minh Tien Nguyen
1,2 and
Shenqyang (Steven) Shy
1,*
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan City 320317, Taiwan
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Technology and Education, The University of Danang, Da Nang City 550000, Vietnam
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(8), 3914; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12083914
Submission received: 1 March 2022 / Revised: 7 April 2022 / Accepted: 11 April 2022 / Published: 13 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Turbulent Combustion)

Abstract

:

Featured Application

A transition of ignition kernel delay time at the early stages of lean premixed n-butane/air turbulent expanding flame propagation is found, which may be relevant to spark ignition engines operated at lean-burn turbulent conditions.

Abstract

This paper explores the effects of root-mean-square turbulence fluctuation velocity (u′) and ignition energy (Eig) on an ignition kernel delay time (τdelay) of lean premixed n-butane/air spherical flames with an effective Lewis number Le ≈ 2.1 >> 1. Experiments are conducted in a dual-chamber, fan-stirred cruciform burner capable of generating near-isotropic turbulence with negligible mean velocities using a pair of cantilevered electrodes with sharp ends at a fixed spark gap of 2 mm. τdelay is determined at a critical flame radius with a minimum flame speed during the early stages of laminar and turbulent flame propagation. Laminar and turbulent minimum ignition energies (MIEL and MIET) are measured at 50% ignitability, where MIEL = 3.4 mJ and the increasing slopes of MIET with u′ change from gradual to drastic when u′ > 0.92 m/s (MIE transition). In quiescence, a transition of τdelay is observed, where the decrement of τdelay becomes rapid (modest) when Eig is less (greater) than MIEL. For turbulent cases, when applying Eig ≈ MIET, the reverse trend of MIE transition is found for τdelay versus u′ results with the same critical u′ ≈ 0.92 m/s. These results indicated that the increasing u′ could reduce τdelay on the one hand, but require higher Eig (or MIET) on the other hand. Moreover, the rising of Eig in a specific range, where Eig ≤ MIE, could shorten τdelay, but less contribution as Eig > MIE. These results may play an important role to achieve optimal combustion phases and design an effective ignition system on spark ignition engines operated under lean-burn turbulent conditions.

1. Introduction

It is known that lean premixed turbulent combustion can enhance the thermal efficiency of spark ignition (SI) engines through the increase of the specific heat ratio [1] and the reduction of heat-transfer losses due to smaller adiabatic flame temperature with lower NOx emissions [2,3]. However, one of the challenges to apply lean burn technology is the misfire problem that often relates to a longer ignition kernel delay time (τdelay) [1,4,5,6] or a slower development of initial flame kernel at the early stage of combustion, which may worsen cycle-to-cycle variations in SI engines. A higher root-mean-square (r.m.s.) turbulence fluctuation velocity (u′) could be useful in accelerating the initial flame kernel development and thus shortening τdelay. However, the increase of u′ usually requires a higher ignition energy (Eig) or minimum ignition energy (MIE) for successful ignition [7]. As such, a clear understanding of the relations among τdelay, MIE, and u′ during the combustion process is essential to the further development of high-thermal efficiency SI engines operated at lean-burn turbulent conditions. This motivates the present study.
To achieve a self-sustained flame propagation, many researchers have investigated a critical flame radius (Rc) for spherical flames (e.g., [8,9,10]) or for spray combustion flames [11]. When the heat release from chemical reaction is greater than the heat dissipation, the initial kernel radius could develop and grow beyond the required Rc, and then successful ignition with self-sustained flame propagation could occur [11]. Therefore, the ignition kernel delay time, which is determined as the time interval from the spark initiation to the time required to reach Rc, is an effective means to evaluate the physicochemical properties of combustible mixtures [11,12,13,14]. Although many ignition studies are available in the literature (e.g., Refs. [15,16,17]), most of these studies are for the autoignition delay time. Hence, τdelay data at the early stage of flame propagation are still sparse. Based on both experimental and numerical studies of laminar spherical flames, Kelley et al. [8] and Chen et al. [9,10] reported that an increase of Eig could enhance the early flame propagation speed, resulting in a shorter τdelay. The larger Eig, the higher concentration of active radicals inside the spark gap [18] and/or the higher chemical power release [19]. Further, using two-dimensional direct numerical simulation, Saito et al. [13] investigated the influence of turbulent strain rate (u′/l) on τdelay of the lean n-C7H16/air mixture at an equivalence ratio of ϕ = 0.5, where u′ and l were the r.m.s. turbulent fluctuating velocity and the integral length scale of turbulence. By assuming the initial peak temperature Tpeak,ini = 1500 K and Rc = 0.5 mm for all turbulent cases, they predicted an increase of τdelay of proportional to (u′/l)2. However, the engine result [20] indicated that the combination of the increase of Eig and the enhancement of in-cylinder turbulence level can lead to a shorter inflammation time from the spark timing to a crank angle of 5%-mass fraction burnt (CA5) and a shorter main combustion duration time (CA10 to CA90), allowing SI engines to be operated at an extra-lean flammability limit. The result in [20] suggested that the determination of τdelay at various Eig (or MIE) and u′ may be important for a better design of SI engines.
The main objective in this study is to gain a better understanding of the influences of Eig and turbulence level on τdelay for lean premixed turbulent combustion, which may be relevant to lean-burn SI engines with high thermal efficiency. To the first level approximation, this study measures MIEL and MIET of a lean n-butane/air mixture with an effective Lewis number Le ≈ 2.1 >> 1 using pin-to-pin electrodes at a fixed spark gap of dgap = 2 mm in a large dual-chamber, fan-stirred cruciform burner capable of generating near-isotropic turbulence with negligible mean velocities. Here, MIE is the measured value of Eig determined at 50% ignitability, the subscripts L and T represent laminar and turbulent conditions, and Le is defined as the ratio of thermal diffusivity and mass diffusivity with the mass diffusivity being that of the deficient reactant and the abundant inert. Near-isotropic turbulence was generated by a pair of counter-rotating fans and perforated plates in the central uniform region of the cruciform burner measured by high-speed PIV, detailed in Refs. [21,22]. Furthermore, as will be shown later, τdelay is determined at a minimum critical radius (Rmin) having a minimum flame speed (dR/dt)min during the early stage of flame kernel development. Hence, the effects of Eig or measured MIEL and MIET, as well as the r.m.s turbulence fluctuation velocity (u′) on τdelay, can be scrutinized.
Moreover, two ignition transition (IT) modes at dgap = 0.8 mm and 2.0 mm, based on MIE as a function of u′ for the present lean n-C4H10/air mixture, similar to that recently reported in Ref. [23] using a lean primary reference fuel (PRF) with Le ≈ 2.98 >> 1, are also discussed. At small dgap = 0.8 mm, an irregular IT is observed, where MIET decreases first with increasing u′ (turbulence facilitated ignition, TFI) and then MIET increases drastically when u′ is greater than some critical value (uc) [24]. The phenomenon of TFI was first observed by Wu et al. [25]. At large dgap = 2.0 mm, a regular IT is found by which the increasing slopes of MIET with u′ change from modestly to exponentially when u′ > uc. Finally, we discuss the relationship between the regular IT and the ignition kernel delay time, as well as their implication to the potential application in SI engines operated at turbulent lean-burn conditions.

2. Experimental Methods

Ignition experiments of the n-butane/air mixture at ϕ = 0.7 with Le ≈ 2.1 >> 1 are conducted in the central uniform region of the large dual-chamber, constant-temperature/pressure, fan-stirred cruciform explosion facility using a pair of stainless-steel electrodes of 2 mm in diameter with sharp ends over a range of u′ = 0~2.1 m/s and at atmospheric pressure and room temperature conditions. The selection of lean n-C4H10 at ϕ = 0.7 as a fuel is because of its possible relevance to lean-burn combustion in SI engines having a sufficiently large Le ≈ 2.1 >> 1, closely matching that of lean gasoline fuel. Such dual-chamber, fan-stirred cruciform burner has been used to measure laminar and turbulent burning velocities of expanding spherical flames at various gaseous and liquid fuel/air mixtures with different values of Le under high-temperature and high-pressure conditions [26,27], as well as MIEL and MIET of the lean iso-octane/air mixture [7] and the lean PRF95/air mixture [23]. Details of the explosion facility and its associated turbulence properties can be found in [21,22,24,28] and references therein. For completeness, a simplified sketch version of the dual-chamber cruciform explosion facility is presented in Figure 1. Moreover, also plotted in Figure 1 is the ignition circuit for generating near-square voltage and current waveforms to measure Eig of high accuracy [7], and the high-speed schlieren imaging arrangement for recording the early development of flame kernels over a range of u′ varying from 0 to 2.1 m/s.
The experimental procedure used in the present work is the same as our previous studies; this will not be elaborated upon here, so the reader is directed to Refs. [23,27,28] for details. The outer safety chamber is pressurized with the dehumidified air at a pressure slightly higher than the initially selected pressure inside the inner cruciform burner. The inner cruciform burner is first vacuumed and then the appropriate mole fractions of n-butane and air are sequentially injected into the inner cruciform burner to 1 atm in this study using the partial pressure method. Next is the mixing of the lean n-butane/air mixture by counter-rotating two specially-designed fans and perforated plates (see Figure 1), where the two fans are rotated at a fixed fan frequency f = 30 Hz for at least 1.5 min to ensure the well mixing of fuel and air. For the laminar case, the two fans are turned off right after the mixing, and then we wait for about 10 s to let turbulence completely dissipate, allowing a quiescent mixture before ignition. As to turbulent cases, after the well mixing of fuel and air, the fan frequency is set to the desired value for the wanted u′ ≈ 0.0462f (ms−1), measured by high-speed particle image velocimetry (PIV) [22,26,29]. Additionally, the integral length scale of turbulence LI ≈ 10.7f0.34 (mm), leveled off to about 45 mm at high values of f ≥ 70 Hz [22,26,29].
A pair of 2-mm stainless-steel electrodes with sharp ends at a constant dgap = 2.0 mm are used to centrally ignite the lean n-butane/air mixture under quiescent and turbulent conditions at various values of Eig controlled by the loading resistors (RΩ) in the ignition circuit (see the top left inset of Figure 1). The higher the value of RΩ is, the smaller the value of Eig is. An accurate Eig measurement is vital to determine the ignition probability, as well as MIEL and MIET. The present work applies the same ignition methodology as used in [7] to measure Eig of high accuracy with near-square current and voltage waveforms. Note that Eig is determined by the integration of the product of I(t) and [V1(t) − V2(t)] across the spark gap (see Figure 1) within a fixed pulse duration time of τp = 100 μs. Schlieren images of the ignition kernel and its subsequent flame development under various experimental conditions are recorded by a high-speed, high-resolution CMOS camcorder (Phantom V711), operated at 25,000 frames per second.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Laminar and Turbulent Minimum Ignition Energies of Lean n-Butane/Air Mixture

Figure 2a shows the ignition probability versus ignition trials with various values of Eig of the lean n-butane/air mixture at ϕ = 0.7 in quiescence, as a typical example for demonstrating the statistical determination of MIE at 50% ignitability. Each datum of MIEL and MIET is determined by more than 30 runs over a range of Eig with either “Go” (open circle symbols) or “No Go” (cross symbols), as indicated in Figure 2a. There is an overlapping regime within which “Go” and “No Go” co-exist. As indicated in Figure 2a, the newly obtained datum of MIEL for the present lean n-C4H10/air mixture at dgap = 2.0 mm is 3.4 mJ. The reader is directed to Ref. [7] for a detailed methodology on MIE determination using the logistic regression method.
In the presence of turbulence at large dgap = 2.0 mm, as shown in Figure 2b, newly measured values of MIET are respectively 3.96 mJ/9.37 mJ/17.3 mJ/30.5 mJ at u′ ≈ 0.46 m/s/0.92 m/s/1.4 m/s/2.1 m/s, where values of MIET are all larger than MIEL = 3.4 mJ. This confirms that that there is no TFI at dgap = 2.0 mm, even when the mixture’s Lewis number is sufficiently greater than unity (Le ≈ 2.1 >> 1). At large dgap = 2.0 mm, turbulence always renders ignition more difficult. A sufficiently large Eig is required to overcome heat losses induced by electrodes and turbulence for successful ignition. In the pre-transition when u′ < uc, MIET increases modestly with increasing u′, while such increase becomes much more drastic when in the post-transition u′ > uc. As previously shown on the inset of Figure 5 in Ref. [24], at small dgap = 0.8 mm, it was found that MIET first decreases with increasing u′ where MIET < MIEL ≈ 23 mJ, showing TFI with the minimum value of MIET ≈ 19.8 mJ occurring also at uc ≈ 0.92 m/s. When u′ > uc, turbulence re-claims its totally dominating role where MIET increases rapidly to be greater than MIEL ≈ 23 mJ. Again, the phenomenon of TFI only occurs at sufficiently large Le >> 1 and at sufficiently small dgap = 0.8 mm. This is attributed to the competition between differential diffusion (the effect of Le) and turbulent dissipation (the effect of u′), similar to that discussed in our previous studies for lean PRF95/air mixture with Le ≈ 2.95 >> 1 [23] or rich hydrogen/air mixture at ϕ = 5.1 with Le ≈ 2.3 >> 1 [28]. In the present study, except at the largest u′ = 2.1 m/s, where almost the same value of MIET ≈ 31 mJ is found for both small and large dgap, all other values of MIEL and MIET at dgap = 2.0 mm are smaller than those of dgap = 0.8 mm (Figure 2b). As such, the use of large dgap = 2.0 mm is better than small dgap = 0.8 mm because the former can have a higher ignition probability than the latter at the same u′ up to 2 m/s.

3.2. Flame Kernel Development in Quiescent and Turbulent Conditions

Figure 3 presents high-speed schlieren images for time evolutions of the early flame kernel development under laminar and turbulent conditions at five different values of u′ varying from 0 to 2.1 m/s, all for successful ignition events. The first four columns have a 24 × 24 mm2 view field to see the embryonic kernel development after the spark discharge; the fifth column has a larger view field of 42 × 42 mm2 for the observation of self-sustained flame propagation.
For the laminar case, the initial rod-like kernel at t = 0.04 ms develops into an oval flame kernel and continuously propagates to form a laminar self-sustained spherical flame at t = 20 ms (the last image of the first row in Figure 3). For the turbulent cases at u′ = 0.46 m/s (the 2nd row) and u′ = 0.92 m/s (the 3rd row), the initial spark kernels at t = 0.04 ms and their subsequent development of flame kernels at t = 1.2 ms are very similar to that of the laminar case, indicating that weak and/or modest turbulence have almost nearly negligible effect on the embryonic kernel development at least up to 1.2 ms. This is possibly due to the suppression effect by the emitted shock wave [30]. However, such a shock wave suppression effect seems to become unimportant, as the kernel is wrinkled earlier by stronger turbulence. This is evidenced by the schlieren images shown in the 4th and 5th rows of Figure 3 at u′ = 1.4 m/s and 2.1 m/s, where the flame kernels at t = 1.2 ms have largely wrinkled by turbulence with higher values of u′. For the early development of the flame kernel, the higher the value of u′ is, the larger the wrinkled flame kernel area is, and the higher the flame kernel speed is. Furthermore, the wrinkled flame kernel with negative curvature segments could be induced by turbulence that can enhance reaction rate of Le >> 1 mixtures through differential diffusion [25]. We observe that turbulence can enhance the flame kernel speed to be much greater than its laminar flame speed for successful ignition events, resulting in a shorter τdelay for the present Le >> 1 flames, as seen by comparing the lapsed times indicated in the last column of Figure 3.

3.3. Effect of Ignition Energy on Ignition Kernel Delay Time in Quiescence

To quantify the ignition kernel delay time as a function of ignition energy during the early development of flame kernel for successful ignition, the time evolutions of flame kernel radii (R) are recorded by using high-speed schlieren imaging (Figure 3). R = (A/π)0.5 and A is the area enclosed by the developing flame kernel front. As such, flame speeds (dR/dt) of the developing flame kernels versus R can be obtained. Figure 4a presents six data sets of (dR/dt) versus R at different Eig varied from one half to twice of MIEL (½MIEL ≤ Eig ≤ 2MIEL, where MIEL = 3.4 mJ) for successful ignition cases. After the discharge, all six laminar flame speeds (dR/dt) first decrease drastically to a minimum value of (dR/dt)min corresponding to a critical flame radius, which is termed as RLmin (see Figure 4a). If the kernel’s heat release generated by chemical reaction can be sustained to be greater than heat losses to electrodes and ambient after τdelay determined at RLmin with the minimum (dR/dt), successful ignition should occur. As such, the self-sustained laminar flame propagation becomes possible, by which dR/dt starts to increase and then the flame speed asymptotically approximates to its laminar burning velocity when R > 15 mm in the present lean n-butane/air flames (Figure 4a). Therefore, τdelay is the time interval from the initiation of the spark to the time that the flame speed reaches its minimum at RLmin. RLmin is found to be about 5 mm in the present study, regardless of different values of Eig applied (Figure 4a). As shown in the inset of Figure 4a, an increase of Eig from 0.5 MIEL to 2 MIEL promotes the early development of the flame kernel growth rate with an increase of (dR/dt)min, resulting in a reduction of τdelay.
Figure 4b shows the ignition kernel delay time measured at RLmin ≈ 5 mm that is plotted against a normalized ignition energy (Eig/MIEL), revealing a transition of τdelay by which the decreasing slope of τdelay with Eig/MIEL changes from rapid to gradual when Eig/MIEL reaches its critical value of unity. Note that the reverse result is found for that of (dR/dt)min. In the pre-transition, when 0.6 < Eig/MIEL < 1, values of τdelay decrease from 7.5 ms to 5 ms, but a much smaller decrease of τdelay from about 4.6 ms to 4.2 ms is observed when 1 < Eig/MIEL ≤ 2.15 in the post-transition. This is attributed to the reverse behavior of the drastic and modest increase of (dR/dt)min before and after the transition occurring at the same critical value of (Eig/MIEL)c ≈ 1.1. The marginal effect of higher Eig/MIEL > 1 on (dR/dt)min and τdelay is probably due to the saturation of the refreshed mixture induced by recirculation vortices inside the initial kernel [31,32] that may limit the increase of active radicals for the laminar case; the increase of heat conduction losses to electrodes with increasing Eig [19] could be another possible factor.

3.4. Effect of Turbulence on Ignition Kernel Delay Time

Figure 5 presents the effect of u′ on τdelay for the early flame kernel development at dgap = 2.0 mm, in which there are five averaged data sets of (dR/dt) versus R at five different values of u′ varying from 0 to 2.1 m/s, similar to the five cases presented in Figure 3. Each datum is averaged from at least three repeated successful ignition runs using the same Eig, where Eig,L ≈ MIEL for the laminar case and Eig,T ≈ MIET at corresponding vlues of u′ for turbulent cases from Figure 2b are applied. As seen, dR/dt increases with increasing u′ that leads to a decrease of τdelay, as indicated in the inset of Figure 5a. These measured (dR/dt)min and τdelay are then plotted in Figure 5b against u′. The result seems to indicate a transition of τdelay that occurs at a critical uc ≈ 0.92 m/s. When u′ < uc, τdelay decreases slightly from 4.8 ms at u′ = 0 to 4.3 ms at u′ ≈ 0.92 m/s (only about 8% decrement). However, when u′ > uc, a more rapid decrease of τdelay is found, where τdelay ≈ 4.3/3.7/2.8 ms at u′ = 0.92/1.4/2.1 m/s, respectively. The decrease of τdelay with increasing u′ is attributed to the flame kernel speed enhancement by turbulence, where corresponding values (dR/dt)min increase with u′. These results in Figure 5b reveal that turbulence in the pre-transition has a small influence on the early flame kernel development, as can be also seen from these sequential schlieren images in the 2nd and 3rd rows of Figure 3. In the post-transition at higher u′ > uc, turbulence can facilitate the growth rate of the early flame kernels (see the 4th and 5th rows in Figure 3), resulting in a more rapid reduction of τdelay. By comparing Figure 2b for the regular MIE transition with Figure 5b for the τdelay transition, it is found that both transitions are reversely dependent on each other. An increase of u′ accelerates the early flame kernel development with a shorter τdelay that requires a sufficiently high MIET to overcome the turbulent convection heat losses; such a trend is even more profound when u′ > uc in the post-transition.

4. Conclusions

Laminar and turbulent minimum ignition energies of a lean n-butane/air mixture with Le ≈ 2.1 >> 1 at a fixed 2-mm inter-electrode gap are statistically measured by the logistic regression method in a dual-chamber, fan-stirred cruciform burner capable of generating near-isotropic turbulence with negligible mean velocities. Using measured values of MIEL and MIET, the effects of the ignition energy and the r.m.s turbulence fluctuation velocity on the early flame kernel speed dR/dt and its associated ignition kernel delay time determined at (dR/dt)min were then investigated. These measurements reveal the following points.
(1) When dgap = 2 mm, it is found that turbulence always renders ignition more difficult; there is no turbulence facilitation ignition which only occurs at small dgap = 0.8 mm (Figure 2b). A regular MIE transition is found, where the increasing slopes of MIE with increasing u′ changes from gradual to rapid when u′ is greater than a critical value of uc ≈ 0.92 m/s for the present study.
(2) In quiescence, the early development of flame kernel speed increases with increasing Eig, resulting in a reduction of the ignition kernel delay time. Specifically, when Eig/MIEL is increased from 0.67 to about 1, values of τdelay decrease drastically from 7.5 ms to 5 ms, but a much more modest decrease of τdelay from about 4.6 ms to 4.2 ms is observed within 1 < Eig/MIEL ≤ 2.15. This is attributed to the reverse behavior of the drastic and modest increase of (dR/dt)min before and after Eig/MIEL ≈ 1.
(3) There is a τdelay transition. In the pre-transition, when u′ < uc ≈ 0.92 m/s, τdelay only decreases slightly from 4.8 ms at u′ = 0 to 4.3 ms at u′ = 0.92 m/s. However, the decrease of τdelay becomes drastic in the post-transition when u′ > uc, where τdelay ≈ 4.3/3.7/2.8 ms at u′ = 0.92/1.4/2.1 m/s, respectively. The decrease of τdelay with increasing u′ is attributed to the flame kernel speed enhancement by turbulence, where corresponding values of (dR/dt)min increase with u′. The increase of u′ promotes the early development of the flame kernel, which results in a smaller τdelay and a higher MIET is required to overcome turbulent convection heat losses; such higher MIET and lower τdelay with increasing u′ become profound when u′ > uc.
These results may be useful to our further understanding of lean premixed turbulent ignition and combustion with a potential application to lean-burn high-thermal efficiency SI engines. As a final remark, it should be interesting in modelling τdelay of the present n-butane/air mixture using detailed chemical kinetics even under one-dimensional or homogeneous condition.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S.; methodology, S.S.; formal analysis, M.T.N.; investigation, M.T.N. and S.S.; resources, S.S.; data curation, M.T.N. and S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T.N. and S.S.; writing—review and editing, S.S.; visualization, M.T.N.; supervision, S.S.; project administration, S.S.; funding acquisition, S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Experiments were conducted in the facilities at the National Central University, Taiwan. S.S.S. thanks the continuous financial support from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, under the grants (MOST 106-2923-E-008-004-MY3; 106-2221-E-008-054-MY3; 109-2221-E-008-088-MY3). M.T.N. greatly appreciates the financial support from the Ministry of Education and Training, Vietnam, under grant B2021-DNA-02.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hayashi, N.; Sugiura, A.; Abe, Y.; Suzuki, K. Development of ignition technology for dilute combustion engines. SAE Int. J. Engines 2017, 10, 984–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nakata, K.; Nogawa, S.; Takahashi, D.; Yoshihara, Y.; Kumagai, A.; Suzuki, T. Engine technologies for achieving 45% thermal efficiency of S.I. engine. SAE Int. J. Engines 2015, 9, 179–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tsuboi, S.; Miyokawa, S.; Matsuda, M.; Yokomori, T.; Iida, N. Influence of spark discharge characteristics on ignition and combustion process and the lean operation limit in a spark ignition engine. Appl. Energy 2019, 250, 617–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Aleiferis, P.G.; Taylor, A.M.K.P.; Ishii, K.; Urata, Y. The nature of early flame development in a lean-burn stratified-charge spark-ignition engine. Combust. Flame 2004, 136, 283–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yu, S.; Zheng, M. Future gasoline engine ignition: A review on advanced concepts. Int. J. Engine Res. 2020, 22, 1743–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. John, B.H. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, 2nd ed.; McGraw-Hill Education: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jiang, L.J.; Shy, S.; Nguyen, M.T.; Huang, S.Y.; Yu, D.W. Spark ignition probability and minimum ignition energy transition of the lean iso-octane/air mixture in premixed turbulent combustion. Combust. Flame 2018, 187, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kelley, A.P.; Jomaas, G.; Law, C.K. Critical radius for sustained propagation of spark-ignited spherical flames. Combust. Flame 2009, 156, 1006–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, Z.; Burke, M.P.; Ju, Y. Effects of Lewis number and ignition energy on the determination of laminar flame speed using propagating spherical flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2009, 32, 1253–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, Z.; Burke, M.P.; Ju, Y. On the critical flame radius and minimum ignition energy for spherical flame initiation. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2011, 33, 1219–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, R.; Okazumi, R.; Nishida, K.; Ogata, Y. Effect of ethanol ratio on ignition and combustion of ethanol-gasoline blend spray in disi engine-like condition. SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 2015, 8, 264–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Petrukhin, N.V.; Grishin, N.N.; Sergeev, S.M. Ignition kernel delay time time—An important fuel property. Chem. Technol. Fuels Oils 2016, 51, 581–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Saito, N.; Minamoto, Y.; Yenerdag, B.; Shimura, M.; Tanahashi, M. Effects of turbulence on ignition of methane–air and n-heptane–air fully premixed mixtures. Combust. Sci. Technol. 2017, 190, 452–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bradley, D.; Lung, F.K.K. Spark ignition and the early stages of turbulent flame propagation. Combust. Flame 1987, 69, 71–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gersen, S.; Mokhov, A.V.; Darmeveil, J.H.; Levinsky, H.B. Ignition properties of n-butane and iso-butane in a rapid compression machine. Combust. Flame 2010, 157, 240–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Healy, D.; Donato, N.S.; Aul, C.J.; Petersen, E.L.; Zinner, C.M.; Bourque, G.; Curran, H.J. N-butane: Ignition kernel delay time measurements at high pressure and detailed chemical kinetic simulations. Combust. Flame 2010, 157, 1526–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Treviño, C.; Turányi, T. Low temperature first ignition of n-butane. Combust. Theory Model. 2019, 23, 1150–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Han, J.; Yamashita, H.; Hayashi, N. Numerical study on the spark ignition characteristics of a methane–air mixture using detailed chemical kinetics: Effect of equivalence ratio, electrode gap distance, and electrode radius on mie, quenching distance, and ignition kernel delay time. Combust. Flame 2010, 157, 1414–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kravchik, T.; Sher, E.; Heywood, J.B. From spark ignition to flame initiation. Combust. Sci. Technol. 1995, 108, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jung, D.; Sasaki, K.; Iida, N. Effects of increased spark discharge energy and enhanced in-cylinder turbulence level on lean limits and cycle-to-cycle variations of combustion for si engine operation. Appl. Energy 2017, 205, 1467–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, C.C.; Shy, S.S.; Chen, H.C.; Peng, M.W. On interaction of centrally-ignited, outwardly-propagating premixed flames with fully-developed isotropic turbulence at elevated pressure. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2011, 33, 1293–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, C.; Shy, S.S.; Peng, M.; Chiu, C.; Dong, Y. High-pressure burning velocities measurements for centrally-ignited premixed methane/air flames interacting with intense near-isotropic turbulence at constant reynolds numbers. Combust. Flame 2012, 159, 2608–2619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shy, S.; Liao, Y.-C.; Chen, Y.-R.; Huang, S.-Y. Two ignition transition modes at small and large distances between electrodes of a lean primary reference automobile fuel/air mixture at 373 K with Lewis number >> 1. Combust. Flame 2021, 225, 340–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nguyen, M.T.; Shy, S.S.; Chen, Y.R.; Lin, B.L.; Huang, S.Y.; Liu, C.C. Conventional spark versus nanosecond repetitively pulsed discharge for a turbulence facilitated ignition phenomenon. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2021, 38, 2801–2808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wu, F.; Saha, A.; Chaudhuri, S.; Law, C.K. Facilitated ignition in turbulence through differential diffusion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 024503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jiang, L.J.; Shy, S.S.; Li, W.Y.; Huang, H.M.; Nguyen, M.T. High-temperature, high-pressure burning velocities of expanding turbulent premixed flames and their comparison with bunsen-type flames. Combust. Flame 2016, 172, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nguyen, M.T.; Yu, D.W.; Shy, S.S. General correlations of high pressure turbulent burning velocities with the consideration of Lewis number effect. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2019, 37, 2391–2398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shy, S.S.; Nguyen, M.T.; Huang, S.Y. Effects of electrode spark gap, differential diffusion, and turbulent dissipation on two distinct phenomena: Turbulent facilitated ignition versus minimum ignition energy transition. Combust. Flame 2019, 205, 371–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shy, S.S.; I, W.K.; Lin, M.L. A new cruciform burner and its turbulence measurements for premixed turbulent combustion study. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2000, 20, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ishii, K.; Aoki, O.; Ujiie, Y.; Kono, M. Investigation of ignition by composite sparks under high turbulence intensity conditions. Symp. Int. Combust. 1992, 24, 1793–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Castela, M.; Stepanyan, S.; Fiorina, B.; Coussement, A.; Gicquel, O.; Darabiha, N.; Laux, C.O. A 3-D DNS and experimental study of the effect of the recirculating flow pattern inside a reactive kernel produced by nanosecond plasma discharges in a methane-air mixture. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2017, 36, 4095–4103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Bane, S.P.M.; Ziegler, J.L.; Shepherd, J.E. Investigation of the effect of electrode geometry on spark ignition. Combust. Flame 2015, 162, 462–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The simplified sketch of a dual-chamber, constant temperature/pressure, fan-stirred explosion facility capable of generating near-isotropic turbulence alongside the schlieren imaging arrangement and the schematic ignition circuit. A typical enlarged schlieren image of the turbulent expanding flame is inserted in the experimentation domain (the central quartz window) to show the electrodes and the successful ignition event.
Figure 1. The simplified sketch of a dual-chamber, constant temperature/pressure, fan-stirred explosion facility capable of generating near-isotropic turbulence alongside the schlieren imaging arrangement and the schematic ignition circuit. A typical enlarged schlieren image of the turbulent expanding flame is inserted in the experimentation domain (the central quartz window) to show the electrodes and the successful ignition event.
Applsci 12 03914 g001
Figure 2. (a) A typical example for determining MIE at 50% ignitability (=Eig,50%) using the logistic regression method. (b) The present MIET data as a function of u′, showing a regular MIE transition occurring at a critical uc ≈ 0.92 m/s. In addition, also plotted for comparison are previous data measured at small dgap = 0.8 mm for the same lean n-butane/air mixture, revealing an irregular MIE transition with TFI when u′ < uc ≈ 0.92 m/s [24].
Figure 2. (a) A typical example for determining MIE at 50% ignitability (=Eig,50%) using the logistic regression method. (b) The present MIET data as a function of u′, showing a regular MIE transition occurring at a critical uc ≈ 0.92 m/s. In addition, also plotted for comparison are previous data measured at small dgap = 0.8 mm for the same lean n-butane/air mixture, revealing an irregular MIE transition with TFI when u′ < uc ≈ 0.92 m/s [24].
Applsci 12 03914 g002
Figure 3. Time evolutions of high-speed schlieren images of the lean n-butane/air mixture at ϕ = 0.7 with Le ≈ 2.1 >> 1 at dgap = 2.0 mm in quiescence and at various turbulent conditions.
Figure 3. Time evolutions of high-speed schlieren images of the lean n-butane/air mixture at ϕ = 0.7 with Le ≈ 2.1 >> 1 at dgap = 2.0 mm in quiescence and at various turbulent conditions.
Applsci 12 03914 g003
Figure 4. (a) Flame speed of the early flame kernel development plotted against flame kernel radius at different Eig using the same experimental settings in quiescence, obtained from the raw flame kernel radii versus time (the inset figure). (b) The ignition kernel delay time (τdelay) measured at RLmin ≈ 5.0 mm, with the minimum flame speed (dR/dt)min plotted against the normalized Eig/MIEL.
Figure 4. (a) Flame speed of the early flame kernel development plotted against flame kernel radius at different Eig using the same experimental settings in quiescence, obtained from the raw flame kernel radii versus time (the inset figure). (b) The ignition kernel delay time (τdelay) measured at RLmin ≈ 5.0 mm, with the minimum flame speed (dR/dt)min plotted against the normalized Eig/MIEL.
Applsci 12 03914 g004
Figure 5. (a) Averaged flame speed plotted against flame radii at different turbulent fluctuating velocities (u′), obtained from the average flame radii versus time (the inset figure). (b) The ignition kernel delay time (τdelay) and minimum flame speed (dR/dt)min as a function of r.m.s turbulent fluctuating velocity u′.
Figure 5. (a) Averaged flame speed plotted against flame radii at different turbulent fluctuating velocities (u′), obtained from the average flame radii versus time (the inset figure). (b) The ignition kernel delay time (τdelay) and minimum flame speed (dR/dt)min as a function of r.m.s turbulent fluctuating velocity u′.
Applsci 12 03914 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nguyen, M.T.; Shy, S. A Transition of Ignition Kernel Delay Time at the Early Stages of Lean Premixed n-Butane/Air Turbulent Spherical Flame Propagation. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3914. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12083914

AMA Style

Nguyen MT, Shy S. A Transition of Ignition Kernel Delay Time at the Early Stages of Lean Premixed n-Butane/Air Turbulent Spherical Flame Propagation. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(8):3914. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12083914

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nguyen, Minh Tien, and Shenqyang (Steven) Shy. 2022. "A Transition of Ignition Kernel Delay Time at the Early Stages of Lean Premixed n-Butane/Air Turbulent Spherical Flame Propagation" Applied Sciences 12, no. 8: 3914. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12083914

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop