Next Article in Journal
Behavioural Traits in Bos taurus Cattle, Their Heritability, Potential Genetic Markers, and Associations with Production Traits
Previous Article in Journal
Poultry Meat Quality in Antibiotic Free Production Has Improved by Natural Extract Supplement
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 12
Issue 19
10.3390/ani12192601
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Prophylactic Effect of Fenestration on the Recurrence of Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disc Disease in Dogs

by
Afroditi E. Pontikaki
,
Kiriaki Pavlidou
,
Zoe Polizopoulou
,
Ioannis Savvas
and
George Kazakos
*
Companion Animal Clinic, School of Veterinary Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 546 27 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(19), 2601; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12192601
Submission received: 29 July 2022 / Revised: 22 September 2022 / Accepted: 23 September 2022 / Published: 28 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Companion Animals)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The prophylactic effect of fenestration on the recurrence of thoracolumbar (TL) intervertebral disc herniation (IVDH) in dogs that have been surgically decompressed has been a topic of ongoing debate in veterinary medicine. The aim of this study was to systematically review the existing literature and critically evaluate the evidence behind the application of prophylactic fenestration on the recurrence of TL IVDH in dogs. PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus electronic databases were searched to collect relevant articles. Twenty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria and were assessed for scientific quality, treatment plan, and recurrence incidence. Five articles were selected for a meta-analysis to test if the recurrence differs in animals treated with or without prophylactic fenestration. In the light of the low scientific quality and the amount of published literature on the topic, further research is needed to robustly support the prophylactic effect of fenestration on the recurrence of TL IVDH in dogs.

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to assess the effect of prophylactic fenestration (PF) on the recurrence of thoracolumbar (TL) intervertebral disc (IVD) disease in dogs. Three online databases were searched (Web of Science, MEDLINE via PubMed, SCOPUS), 115 relevant studies were thoroughly examined by the authors, 29 of which met the pre-defined inclusion criteria for this systematic review. Data about the initial treatment, the performance of PF, the incidence of recurrence, and the site of recurrence were extracted. Most of the studies were deemed to have serious to moderate risk of bias. Out of 5457 dogs, 1264 underwent prophylactic fenestration. A total of 504 cases of suspected or confirmed recurrence were recorded, in which 164 (32.54% of total recurrences and 11.02% of PF cases) were in dogs treated with PF. In order to perform quantitative analysis for the recurrence odds, we conducted a meta-analysis. Five studies were included that met the inclusion criteria. Despite a large number of relevant publications, the quality of the evidence they provide is low. This prevented us from reaching a definitive conclusion on the prophylactic effect of fenestration on recurrence in dogs surgically treated for TL IVDH.

1. Introduction

Thoracolumbar intervertebral disc herniation (IVDH) is reported as the most common IVDH in canine patients, with a ratio of 66–87% [1]. The intervertebral disc spaces of T12-T13 to L2-L3 have been shown to be at higher risk, especially the T12-T13 and T13-L1 [2,3,4,5,6,7]. Hansen type I disc extrusion is commonly seen with chondrodystrophic breeds and the Dachshund shows a particular high risk [1]. For a definitive diagnosis of TL intervertebral disc herniation (IVDH) and localization of the herniated disc, the gold standard of imaging studies is Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) [1,8,9,10]. Surgical decompression, with hemilaminectomy being the preferred method, is invariably the treatment of choice when neurological deficits ensue [11]. Concomitant prophylactic fenestration of the adjacent not affected discs is not always performed as its efficacy as a prophylactic measure is questioned. In a survey conducted among board-certified surgeons and neurologists in order to gain information about the management of TL IVDH in everyday clinical practice, fenestration was performed by 69% of neurologists but only by 36% of surgeons. On the same questionnaire, 47% of the surgeons responded that they never or rarely performed fenestration in contrast to 12% of neurologists [12].
Fenestration involves the removal of the nucleus pulposus (NP) through a window in the annulus fibrosus (AF) of the intervertebral disc (IVD) [13]. It is a surgical method used for management of patients with TL IVDH, attempting not only treatment of acute pain but prophylaxis against early and late recurrence at the adjacent and other discs. Fenestration could be accomplished by manual (blade), power-assisted, percutaneous laser disc ablation (PLDA), cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspiration (CUSA), vacuum aspiration, chemonucleolysis and, most recently, discolysis by injection of radiopaque gelified ethanol [14,15,16,17]. The effectiveness of the procedure is based on the amount of the NP removed, although complete removal is not achievable, and it is correlated with a surgeon’s skills [18,19]. Fenestration seems to reduce the chance of further herniation of the prophylactically treated discs, especially in cases of mineralized discs. This favors Dachshunds especially, who are 10 times more prone to recurrence than other breeds, especially in adjacent mineralized discs [13,20,21,22,23,24]. However, there is no confirmed evidence that after fenestration the created window will remain open, or it will act as an alternate path [13,25]. Despite the fact that fenestrated discs appear to not herniate, relapse of disease seems to occur in the adjacent and/or further discs spaces [1]. Moreover, the increase in anesthesia and surgical time, the post-surgical exacerbation of the neurological deficits, the risk of complications, such as hemorrhages and iatrogenic pneumothorax, post-surgical morbidity (scoliosis, abdominal wall weakness) and discospondylitis are some of the main arguments against fenestration. Furthermore, PF has been identified as a predisposing factor of vertebral subluxation and instability, disc degeneration and persistent lameness or paresis on pelvic limbs (due to root trauma when fenestration is performed on L3 and on more caudal intervertebral disc spaces) [26]. Considering that it may only favor a few animals and comes with the risk of recurrence, the question if fenestration should be applied prophylactically as a routine remains unanswered.
This systematic review critically evaluates the existing literature and research data to determine if there is enough evidence to safely support the argument that fenestration decreases the risk of recurrence in thoracolumbar disc (TLD) disease in canine patients, or if further research and investigation are required.

2. Materials and Methods

The protocol of this systematic review was performed according to the guidelines of the Systematic Review Protocol for Animal Intervention Studies (SYRCLE).
Two research teams with two researchers each (group A: GK/AP; Group B: IS/KP) were set up to evaluate and assess the articles and conduct the systematic review (SR). Any authors of this review were excluded from the evaluation of any eligible study in which they were also authors.

2.1. Literature Search and Identification

The PICO (P: population, I: intervention, C: control, O: outcome) question of this research is if PF in TLD spaces, in dogs previously suffering from and treated for TLD herniation, decreases the risk of recurrence of TL IVD prolapse. Three electronic databases were used as literature sources to determine the incidence of recurrence through references in articles of interest: MEDLINE via PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus. The string sequence used in each database engine was: (thoracolumbar disc* OR thoracolumbar disk*) OR (fenestration OR ablation OR annulectomy OR discectomy) AND (canine* OR dog*) AND (recurrence).

2.2. Study Selection

Types of studies included in this review were cohort studies (retrospective, prospective and case series studies) and clinical studies (randomized clinical trials and blinded clinical trials) in English up to June 2022. Cadaveric studies, review studies and case reports were excluded from our research. The population investigated was dogs with TLD disease of all breeds and ages. Surgically treated dogs without concomitant PF when the relapse outcome was recorded were set as the control group, while the surgically treated animals with concomitant PF were defined as the intervention group. The surgical treatment identified was any surgical technique chosen for treatment of the affected disc. In this SR, the primary outcome established the number of dogs that experienced a recurrence episode. Related data were collected from the available follow-up (clinical examination from a veterinarian or telephone communication with the owners). Confirmed (by surgery or imaging study) and suspected (presentation suffering related clinical signs) recurrences were both included. Complications related with PF were the secondary outcome of interest. Unrelated to this review studies, duplicated research, studies unavailable in full texts and abstract only papers were excluded from this SR. Similarly, studies that did not fit the inclusion criteria were excluded. The PICO framework of the study featuring the inclusion criteria of the systematic review is demonstrated in Table 1.

2.3. Study Screening and Data Extraction

After screening the included studies at the title and abstract level from the two author groups, the data extracted from each research were: author, title, year, sample number, surgical treatment of choice, performance of PF, incidence of recurrence, site of recurrence (if mentioned in detail).

2.4. Quality Assessment

For the introduction, storage, analysis, and synthesis of data, a specialized software (Review Manager/RevMan Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014) was used. To evaluate the risk of bias on each of the included articles, two risk of bias assessment tools were used: ROBINS I for the cohort studies (retrospective studies and prospective studies/case series) with the recommended scale: Low–Moderate–Serious–Critical–No information. RoB2 was used for the clinical trials (randomized clinical trials, blinded clinical trials) with the recommended assessment scale: High–Low–With Some concerns in the RoB2 tool. Each tool was used according to the existing guidelines (https://www.riskofbias.info/, accessed on 23 September 2022). Quality reviews were independently conducted by the two research teams (GK/AP; IS/KP).

2.5. Data Analysis

Descriptive statistics is used to evaluate the results of our SR. Recurrence incidence among the total population examined, PF cases and Dachshunds were recorded. Additionally, the recurrent incidences, other than the primary surgical treated area (cranially and caudally), were recorded, as were areas of interest according to the literature. To evaluate the difference of the incidence of recurrence after PF, a meta-analysis was conducted. Included studies investigate the number of prophylactic fenestrations performed, recurrence rate and site of recurrence. Only the confirmed recurrence cases (by surgery or imaging study) were included to identify the incidence. A second meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the difference of the incidence of recurrence after PF on adjacent disc(s). The selected inclusion criteria were the same as in the previous meta-analysis, with the addition of cases that experienced confirmed recurrence on disc(s) adjacent to a previously surgically treated area. RevMan software was used for the meta-analysis. The outcome was dichotomous and analyzed by the Mantel–Haenszel method with a random effects model. The I-squared index was employed to evaluate heterogeneity, with values: 0% to 40%: might not be important; 30% to 60%: may represent moderate heterogeneity; 50% to 90%: may represent substantial heterogeneity; 75% to 100%: considerable heterogeneity. Heterogeneity was calculated. Statistical significance was set to α = 0.05.

3. Results

As evidenced in the flow diagram (Figure 1), 818 articles were extracted from the selected electronic databases. After the removal of the duplicates, 648 articles remained. After screening the articles at title and abstract level from the two research groups (GK/AP; IS/KP), 115 were eligible for further screening at full text level. Twenty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria for the SR. From the 29 included studies, 27 were cohort studies and 2 were randomized clinical trials. Five of them were suitable for meta-analysis.

3.1. Characteristics of the Excluded Studies

Eighty-six studies were excluded from the SR for the following reasons:

3.2. Characteristics of the Included Studies

Of the 29 studies included, 9 examined dogs with TLD surgically treated with concomitant PF, 14 studies were without PF, and 6 of them included both dogs with and without PF. Five out of those six studies were included in the meta-analysis (Table 2). One study was excluded from the meta-analysis as it could not provide sufficient data for the recurrent dogs. Most of them were retrospective studies (24), three were prospective studies/prospective case series study and two were clinical trials. Finally, data for 5457 dogs with thoracolumbar IVDH were collected and examined in terms of recurrence incidence.

3.3. Risk of Bias in the Included Studies

Twenty-seven cohort studies were evaluated in seven domains of bias due to confounding factors, selection of participants into the study, classification of intervention, deviations from intended interventions, missing data, measurement of outcome, and selection of the reported result as proposed by the guidelines. The majority of the included studies were evaluated as serious (16), while for 10 studies the evaluation grade was critical and for 1 was moderate (Figure 2 and Figure 3). The two clinical trials (one randomized, one blinded) were evaluated for risk of bias with the ROB2 tool in five domains: randomization process, deviation from intended intervention, missing outcome data, measurement of the outcome, and selection of the reported result. One was evaluated as low bias and the second as high bias, due to missing data (Figure 4 and Figure 5).

3.4. Characteristics of the Examined Population

Five thousand four hundred and fifty-seven canines with TL IVDH were examined and surgically decompressed in the 29 studies included in the SR. Dachshunds were the most affected breed with 2161 (39.60%) affected animals. In seven studies the population examined was: (a) only chondrodystrophic breeds [23,113,114]; (b) only Dachshunds [117,120]; (c) only large breed dogs [117]; and (d) only French bulldogs [123]. In one study the breeds were recorded only for the recurrent cases [107]. Twelve studies (n = 2593 dogs) [19,20,21,22,24,104,106,107,108,113,116,121] recorded the primary affected site, with the highest presentation of IVDH being at T12-13 (n = 484, 18.66%).

3.5. Characteristics of Prophylactic Fenestration

In total, 15 out of the 29 included studies have examined dogs with TL IVD surgically treated with concomitant PF (see in Table 2). Fourteen had full records for the number of dogs that underwent PF. In one study the number of dogs was not specified [122]. Overall, 1487 dogs out of the total 5457 dogs (27.25%) belonged to the intervention group. The types of prophylactic fenestration used were manual blade fenestration [19,20,21,23,24], power-assisted fenestration [21,24], PLDA [8,15,109,118], and chemonucleolysis [24].

3.6. Recurrence Incidence among the Surgically Treated Dogs

Out of 5457 dogs surgically treated for TL IVDH, available follow-up existed only for 5235 of them. The two author groups assessed the recurrence incidence in all the studies as established from our inclusion criteria. Some dogs experienced more than one incidence of recurrence. No recurrence incidence occurred in three of the included studies [20,110,120]. Another three did not provide full data records for the dogs that experienced a recurrent episode [19,122,123]. Five hundred and four dogs had at least one suspected or confirmed episode of recurrence of the total dogs examined (total: 5457 dogs). From the total recurrences, 105 were recorded in Dachshunds (20.83%). However, only in 11 studies out of 29 the breed of recurrent dogs was recorded [15,19,21,22,24,105,106,107,118,121,123]. No sufficient data were able to be collected to distinguish the recurrent Dachshunds that underwent PF from the included studies. Recurrent PF cases (total = 164, confirmed = 61, suspected = 103) represented 32.54% of the total 504 recorded recurrences (and 11.02% of the total PF cases (n = 1487). A total of 82 out of 164 incidences of recurrence in PF cases (50.0% of PF recurrences; 16.27% of total 504 recurrences) were found to occur at a site other than the PF treated area, and only in eight cases (4.88% of PF recurrences; 1.59% of total 504 recurrences) were located on the surgically treated area. In five studies [15,108,114,118,122] the exact site of the recurrence was not investigated and in one study [119] the group in which the relapsed cases occurred was not recorded. Table 3 illustrates a summary of the recurrence cases.

3.6.1. Recurrence Incidence Cranially to Primary Surgically Treated Site

The recurrence incidence cranially to the primary surgically treated site retrieved from seven studies is demonstrated in Table 4. Out of 504 dogs that experienced recurrence, 17 (3.37%) involved a disc more cranially than those surgically treated with decompression. Six of such recurrences occurred in the PF group of dogs and represented 3.66% of PF recurrent dogs (n = 164).

3.6.2. Recurrence Incidences on the Caudal Lumbar Area (L3-L4-L5-L6)

Recurrence incidences on caudal lumbar area were recorded on six studies [19,21,24,107,116,121]. Of the 25 incidences, 10 were on L3-4, 12 on L4-5, and 3 on L5-6. In one study [107], there was one more caudal recurrence on L3-4. This was due to a previously operated disc, and it was excluded. These recurrences represent 4.96% of total recurrences (n = 504). Seventeen of this type of incidence occurred in the intervention group representing 68.0% of recurrences on the caudal lumbar area (n = 25) and 10.36% of the total incidences in PF group (n = 164). Results are shown in Table 5.

3.7. Secondary Outcome: Complications Associated with PF

Complications associated with PF were reported in 10 studies. The most common complications seen among the examined population were: discospondylitis (3 dogs); mild pneumothorax (4 dogs); hemorrhage or hematoma at the needle site in the dogs that underwent PLDA (10 dogs); exacerbation of the neurological deficits (14 dogs); abdominal wall weakness (4 dogs); and ataxia (7 dogs). In Table 6, complications are presented in detail.

3.8. Meta-Analysis for Recurrence Ratio between Dogs with and without PF

A meta-analysis was conducted to determine the exact ratio of recurrence between dogs with or without prophylactic fenestration. Data from 1406 dogs were collected out of five studies that met the inclusion criteria [19,21,24,104,105]. Overall, PF was performed on 1134 dogs and 272 dogs treated without PF. In total, 59 dogs experienced recurrence (PF n = 43, without PF n = 16). The heterogeneity within the five included studies was substantial and statistically significant (Tau2 = 1.26; Chi2 = 10.47; df = 4 (p = 0.03); I2 = 62%). The overall effect of the meta-analysis was statistically non-significant (p = 0.97). The results are demonstrated in Figure 6.

3.9. Meta-Analysis for Recurrence Ratio on Disc(s) Adjacent to Surgical Treated Area between Dogs with and without PF

A meta-analysis was conducted to demonstrate the ratio of recurrence on the adjacent disc to previously surgically treated dogs with or without PF. Data from three studies that met the inclusion criteria were collected [19,24,104]. Recurrence incidents on adjacent discs were recorded, all of them on PF group of dogs. Overall, 16 dogs experienced this type of recurrence. The results of this meta-analysis are presented in Figure 7. The heterogeneity among the three studies was substantial and statistically non-significant (Tau2 = 3.05; Chi2 = 4.53; df = 2 (p = 0.10); I2 = 56%). The overall effect on the difference in ratio between the two groups was statistically non-significant (p = 0.85).

4. Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to robustly estimate the incidence of recurrence in dogs that underwent PF for TLD herniation. From the included studies, data about the initial treatment, the performance of PF, the incidence of recurrence, and the site of recurrence were extracted. Most of the studies were considered to be running a serious to critical risk of bias, with missing data being the key factor impacting the overall bias grade.
This SR can make a range of important assumptions. From the pool of the 5457 surgically treated dogs, the total number of recurrences was low at 9.23% (number of dogs (n = 504)). From the total recurrences (n = 504, suspected and confirmed) the percentage of canines previously fenestrated was relatively high (32.54%, n = 164). Relapses on previously prophylactically fenestrated discs were recorded only in eight cases in the SR. They represent only 4.88% of the total incidences in dogs that underwent PF (n = 164, suspected and confirmed). Eighty-two (50.0%) of PF recurrent cases had a confirmed recurrence in other than the fenestrated discs. In a published review about the prophylactic role of the fenestration in TL IVDH, a recurrence rate is referred to from 0–24.4% [1]. This finding is in line with the results of the present SR. The same question appears once again about the role of fenestration as a prophylaxis for future disc extrusions on adjacent and further discs. These recurrences may be correlated with vertebral instability as AF has a stabilizing effect on spine. A cadaveric study [43] supports that the combination of hemilaminectomy and fenestration produced the greatest degree of instability in the vertebral column, with fenestration being the most significant, single destabilizing factor. In an effort to quantify the incidence in the previously fenestrated dogs, a meta-analysis was conducted. The measured heterogeneity was substantial and significant, but the overall effect of PF on recurrence ratio was non-significant. At this point it is important to mention that the surgical technique used in the majority of these studies (with only one exception) was manual blade or power-assisted fenestration. Records for the type of the chosen fenestration technique performed in the recurrent cases were missing. Hence this review cannot draw safe conclusions about the incidence of recurrence according to the type of fenestration.
As noted above, 82 confirmed cases of recurrences were found in areas other than the primary PF treated area. Seventeen of those incidences (10.36% of recurrent PF cases) occurred in the caudal lumbar area (L3-4-5-6). Interestingly, the caudal lumbar area was the site of spontaneous incidence of IVDH in 3.7% and 7% of reported cases [1,2,24], which is less than the rate in this SR. It seems that PF may result in non-fenestrated adjacent disc herniation. Moreover, 6 out of 164 recurrences (3.66%) on dogs that underwent PF have occurred in a disc more cranial than the primarily treated discs. These results are in agreement with the widely held belief that prophylactic fenestration may decrease the recurrence in the disc that underwent treatment, but on the other hand, may result in other IVDH in discs located adjacent or further away from the treated site. Aikawa et al., 2012 [19] recommended that if there is a concern of possible vertebral instability, the vertebral segment should be stabilized, to minimize the possibility of recurrence in further discs. Considerations also exist for the iatrogenic nerve roots damage of the lumbar intumescence, during fenestration on the caudal area of L4-L5-L6 [26,107]. Only three studies met the criteria for a meta-analysis to correlate the incidence of recurrence in the adjacent discs between the surgically treated canines with or without concomitant PF. Once again, the heterogeneity was substantial but statistically non-significant and so was its overall effect.
In this systematic review, data were also collected about the breed and the site of presentation of IVDH. Dachshunds represented in the majority of the cases with IVDH. In the relevant literature, chondrodystrophic breeds and, more specifically, Dachshunds are at higher risk to experience at least one episode of IVDH during their life and also at higher risk of recurrence [1,13,26]. In this SR, the recurrent episodes of Dachshunds reflect 20.83% (n = 105) of the total recurrences. Although Dachshunds seem to be at a higher risk for recurrence than other breeds in this SR, it will be unreasonable to make this assumption as the breed of the recurrent dogs was reported in only 8 out of 27 studies (in three studies, there was no recurrence).
As for the complications related to the prophylactic fenestration, only 10 out of the 17 included studies where PF was performed recorded the incidence of complication postoperatively. Complications associated with the surgeon’s skills or with the chosen technique of fenestration (spinal cord damage, hematomas at the site of insertion, hemorrhages, pneumothorax, hemothorax, nerve root trauma) could be limited [19]. For other complications, such as abdominal wall weakness, discospondylitis, vertebral instability pneumothorax, and neurological deterioration postoperatively, further research is needed, apart from cadaveric studies, to show the actual clinical impact on dogs that underwent PF.
A significant limitation to this SR is that available studies that detect the recurrence incidences post prophylaxis of intervertebral discs by fenestration, were qualitative assessed to have serious to critical risk of bias. Authors also collected data from studies whose aim was not always to screen the incidence of the recurrence, but enough information was presented. The decision to include these studies was based on the relatively small pool of available studies. Relevant studies that were not written in English, or studies that were not available on electronic databases were excluded, which may have affected our results. The available literature includes retrospective studies, among which there was a high variability of: (1) the selected dogs (chondrodystrophic or not, small or large breeds, dogs with or without previous IVDH episodes, presence or not of deep pain perception on the examined canines), (2) intended intervention techniques of fenestration, and (3) follow-up periods. The main limitation among the included studies, which affected the bias risk of this SR, was that the postoperative follow-up was based on telephone contact with the owners and many of the relapsed incidences recorded were suspected but not confirmed. Authors believe that the low evidence bias was expected as 24 of the 29 studies were retrospective and the inclusion criteria and the outcome of each study differed. This was a serious limitation to the attempt to provide a definitive answer to the research question of this study.
Prophylactic fenestration is not consistently performed with individual variability as its effectiveness is still questioned. The complications associated with the procedure, the increase surgical and anesthesia time, postoperative morbidity, and the relative cost should be taken under consideration. This systematic review could not reach a safe conclusion about its contribution towards prophylaxis against recurrence in dogs suffering TLD herniation.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the question of whether PF decreases the rate of recurrence in 5457 cases remains unanswered. PF protects the treated discs from further herniation. However, the risk to the adjacent and further discs has not been determined. The role of the AF for the vertebral stability of the spine is indisputable and it is sacrificed during this procedure. It is clear to the authors that the risk of recurrence in discs not fenestrated prophylactically remains high. Unfortunately, the quality of evidence provided in this SR is low and prevents the authors from reaching valuable conclusions on the recurrence incidence in dogs surgically treated with concomitant PF for thoracolumbar disc herniation. The authors highlight the need for further studies, preferably clinical trials, to offer objective insights into the recurrence risk in adjacent discs following surgical treatment with PF.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.E.P. and G.K.; methodology, A.E.P., G.K., I.S. and K.P.; formal analysis, A.E.P., G.K., I.S., Z.P. and K.P.; reviewing, A.E.P., G.K., I.S., Z.P. and K.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brisson, B.A. Intervertebral Disc Disease in Dogs. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2010, 40, 829–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Brown, N.O.; Helphrey, M.L.; Prata, R.G. Thoracolumbar Disk Disease in Dog Retrospective Analysis of 187 Cases. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 1977, 13, 665–672. [Google Scholar]
  3. Knecht, C.D. Results of Surgical Treatment for Thoracolumbar Disk Protrusion. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1972, 13, 449–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Levine, J.M.; Fosgate, G.T.; Chen, A.V.; Rushing, R.; Nghiem, P.P.; Platt, S.R.; Bagley, R.S.; Kent, M.; Hicks, D.G.; Young, B.D.; et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Dogs with Neurologic Impairment Due to Acute Thoracic and Lumbar Intervertebral Disk Herniation. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2009, 23, 1220–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hansen, H.J. A Pathologic-Anatomical Study on Disc Degeneration in Dog, with Special Reference to the so-Called EnchondrosisIntervertebralis. Acta Orthop. Scand. 1952, 11, 1–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tanaka, H.; Nakayama, M.; Takase, K. Usefulness of Myelography with Multiple Views in Diagnosis of Circumferential Location of Disc Material in Dogs with Thoracolumber Intervertebral Disc Herniation. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2004, 66, 827–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gambardella, P.C. Dorsal Decompressive Laminectomy for Treatment of Thoracolumbar Disk Disease in Dogs-A Retrospective Study of 98 Cases. Vet. Surg. 1980, 9, 24–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Irizarry, I.N.; Dugat, D.R.; Sippel, K.M.; Payton, M.E. Evaluation of the Intervertebral Disk, Vertebral Body, and Spinal Cord for Changes Secondary to Percutaneous Laser Disk Ablation. Vet. Surg. 2022, 51, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Naude, S.H.; Lambrechts, N.E.; Wagner, W.M.; Thompson, P.N. Association of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings with Surgical Features in Dachshunds with Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disk Extrusion. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2008, 232, 702–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Besalti, O.; Pekcan, Z.; Sirin, Y.S.; Erbas, G. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Dogs with Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disk Disease: 69 Cases (1997–2005). J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 2006, 228, 902–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Langerhuus, L.; Miles, J. Proportion Recovery and Times to Ambulation for Non-Ambulatory Dogs with Thoracolumbar Disc Extrusions Treated with Hemilaminectomy or Conservative Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case-Series Studies. Vet. J. 2017, 220, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Moore, S.A.; Early, P.J.; Hettlich, B.F. Practice Patterns in the Management of Acute Intervertebral Disc Herniation in Dogs. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2016, 57, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Brisson, B.A. Pros and Cons of Prophylactic Fenestration; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; ISBN 9781118940372. [Google Scholar]
  14. Denny, H.R. The Lateral Fenestration of Canine Thoracolumbar Disc Protrusions: A Review of 30 Cases. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1978, 19, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dickey, D.T.; Bartels, K.E.; Henry, G.A.; Stair, E.L.; Schafer, S.A.; Fry, T.R.; Nordquist, R.E. Use of the Holmium Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser for Percutaneous Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disk Ablation in Dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1996, 208, 1263–1267. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Bray, J.P.; Burbidge, H.M.; Thompson, K.G. A Comparative Study of Chemonucleolysis with Collagenase and Fenestration on the Canine Intervertebral Disc. Prog. Veternary Neurol. 1996, 7, 117–123. [Google Scholar]
  17. Forterre, F.; Dickomeit, M.; Senn, D.; Gorgas, D.; Spreng, D. Microfenestration Using the CUSA Excel Ultrasonic Aspiration System in Chondrodystrophic Dogs with Thoracolumbar Disk Extrusion: A Descriptive Cadaveric and Clinical Study. Vet. Surg. 2011, 40, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hettlich, B.F.; Kerwin, S.C.; Levine, J.M. Early Reherniation of Disk Material in Eleven Dogs with Surgically Treated Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disk Extrusion. Vet. Surg. 2012, 41, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Aikawa, T.; Fujita, H.; Shibata, M.; Takahashi, T. Recurrent Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disc Extrusion after Hemilaminectomy and Concomitant Prophylactic Fenestration in 662 Chondrodystrophic Dogs. Vet. Surg. 2012, 41, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Davies, J.V.; Sharp, N.J.H. A Comparison of Conservative Treatment and Fenestration for Thoracolumbar Intervertebral-Disk Disease in the Dog. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1983, 24, 721–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Brisson, B.A.; Holmberg, D.L.; Parent, J.; Sears, W.C.; Wick, S.E. Comparison of the Effect of Single-Site and Multiple-Site Disk Fenestration on the Rate of Recurrence of Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disk Herniation in Dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2011, 238, 1593–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mayhew, P.D.; McLear, R.C.; Ziemer, L.S.; Culp, W.T.N.; Russell, K.N.; Shofer, F.S.; Kapatkin, A.S.; Smith, G.K. Risk Factors for Recurrence of Clinical Signs Associated with Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disk Herniation in Dogs: 229 Cases (1994–2000). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2004, 225, 1231–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Funkquist, B. Investigations of the Therapeutic and Prophylactic Effects of Disc Evacuation in Cases of Thoraco-Lumbar Herniated Discs in Dogs. Acta Vet. Scand. 1978, 19, 441–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Brisson, B.A.; Moffatt, S.L.; Swayne, S.L.; Parent, J.M. Recurrence of Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disk Extrusion in Chondrodystrophic Dogs after Surgical Decompression with or without Prophylactic Fenestration: 265 Cases (1995–1999). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2004, 224, 1808–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Holmberg, D.L.L.; Palmer, N.C.C.; Vanpelt, D.; Willan, A.R. A Comparison of Manual and Power-Assisted Thoracolumbar Disc Fenestration in Dogs. Vet. Surg. 1990, 19, 323–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Forterre, F.; Fingeroth, J.M.M. Pros and Cons of Prophylactic Fenestration: The Potential Arguments against; Wiley Online Books: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; ISBN 9781118940372/9780470959596. [Google Scholar]
  27. Necas, A. Rate of Neurologic Recovery as an Indicator of Long-Term Prognosis in Dogs with Surgically Treated Thoracolumbar Disc Disease. Vet. Med. 2000, 45, 19–24. [Google Scholar]
  28. Grevel, V.; Schwartau, K. Hemilaminectomy in Thoracolumbar Disc Disease in the Dog. 2. Intraoperative Findings and Surgical Results. Kleintierpraxis 1997, 42, 173. [Google Scholar]
  29. Klesty, A.; Forterre, F.; Bolln, G. Outcome of Intervertebral Disk Disease Surgery Depending on Dog Breed, Location and Experience of the Surgeon: 1113 Cases. Tierarztl. Prax. Ausg. K Kleintiere Heimtiere 2019, 47, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Godde, T.; Jaggy, A. Diagnosis and Treatment of the Thoracolumbar Disk Protrusion in the Dachshund. Prakt. Tierarzt 1993, 74, 653. [Google Scholar]
  31. Flegel, T.; Munch, M.; Heidi, K.; Salger, F.; Ziegler, L.; Bottcher, P. Multiple Thoracolumbar Partial Lateral Corpectomies in 17 Dogs. Tierarztl. Prax. Ausg. K Kleintiere Heimtiere 2016, 44, 397–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Grevel, V.; Schwartau, K. Hemilaminectomy in Thoracolumbar Disc Disease in the Dog.1. Clinical Signs and Radiodiagnostics. Kleintierpraxis 1997, 42, 5. [Google Scholar]
  33. Festugatto, R.; Mazzanti, A.; Raiser, A.G.; Pelizzari, C.; Salbego, F.Z.; Beckmann, D.V.; Pereira, D.T.; dos Santos, R.P. Functional recovery of dogs with thoracolumbar intervertebral disk disease submitted the surgical treatment. Cienc. Rural 2008, 38, 2232–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Santos, R.P.; Mazzanti, A.; Beckmann, D.V.; Berte, L.; Ripplinger, A.; Polidoro Neto, D.; Baumhardt, R. Functional recovery in dogs with thoracolumbar intervertebral disk disease without deep pain perception: 37 cases (2002–2010). Pesqui. Vet. Bras. 2011, 31, 345–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chaves, R.O.; Polidoro, D.N.; Feranti, J.P.S.; Fabretti, A.K.; Copat, B.; Gomes, L.A.; Mazzanti, A. Clinical Evaluation of Dogs with Intervertebral Disc Disease (Hansen Type I) Submitted to Surgical Decompression: 110 Cases. Pesqui. Vet. Bras. 2017, 37, 835–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. McKee, W.M.; Downes, C.J. Vertebral Stabilisation and Selective Decompression for the Management of Triple Thoracolumbar Disc Protrusions. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2008, 49, 536–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Stigen, Ø.; Ottesen, N.; Jäderlund, K.H. Early Recurrence of Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disc Extrusion after Surgical Decompression: A Report of Three Cases. Acta Vet. Scand. 2010, 52, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Arthurs, G. Spinal Instability Resulting from Bilateral Mini-Hemilaminectomy and Pediculectomy. Vet. Comp. Orthop. Traumatol. 2009, 22, 422–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Marinho, P.V.T.; Macedo, A.S.; Ferrigno, C.R.A.; Dal-Bo, I.S.; Pinto, A.C.B.C.F.; Ontivero, C.R.G.R.; Paes, F.; Bregadioli, T.; Rocha, M.C.; Nery, C.V.C.; et al. Pediculectomy and Fenestration for Spinal Cord Decompression of the Lumbar Spine of a Bush Dog (SpeothosVenaticus)-Case Report. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2020, 72, 1397–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Covino Diamante, G.A.; TertulianoMarinho, P.V.; Zani, C.C.; Elias, B.C.; Bahr Arias, M.V. Intervertebral Disc Extrusion between T8 and T9 in a Dachshund. Acta Sci. Vet. 2016, 44, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  41. Liptak, J.M.; Watt, P.R.; Thomson, M.J.; Copeland, S.E.; Galloway, A.M. Hansen Type I Disk Disease at T1-2 in a Dachshund. Aust. Vet. J. 1999, 77, 156–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kim, J.; Kim, H.; Hwang, J.; Eom, K.; Kim, J. Far Lateral Lumbar Disc Extrusion in a Dachshund Dog. Korean J. Vet. Res. 2019, 59, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hill, T.P.; Lubbe, A.M.; Guthrie, A.J. Lumbar Spine Stability Following Hemilaminectomy, Pediculectomy, and Fenestration. Vet. Comp. Orthop. Traumatol. 2000, 13, 165–171. [Google Scholar]
  44. Reves, N.V.; Buerki, A.; Ferguson, S.; Geissbuehler, U.; Stahl, C.; Forterre, F. Influence of Partial Lateral Corpectomy with and without Hemilaminectomy on Canine Thoracolumbar Stability: A Biomechanical Study. Vet. Surg. 2012, 41, 228–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Schulz, K.S.; Waldron, D.R.; Grant, J.W.; Shell, L.; Smith, G.; Shires, P.K. Biomechanics of the Thoracolumbar Vertebral Column of Dogs during Lateral Bending. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1996, 57, 1228–1232. [Google Scholar]
  46. Lockwood, A.A.; Griffon, D.J.; Gordon-Evans, W.; Matheson, J.A.; Barthelemy, N.; Schaeffer, D.J. Comparison of Two Minimally Invasive Approaches to the Thoracolumbar Spinal Canal in Dogs. Vet. Surg. 2014, 43, 209–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Thomovsky, S.A.; Packer, R.A.; Lambrechts, N.E.; Moore, G.E. Canine Intervertebral Disc Fenestration Using a Vacuum-Assisted Tissue Resection Device. Vet. Surg. 2012, 41, 1011–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jeffery, N.D.; Harcourt-Brown, T.R.; Barker, A.K.; Levine, J.M. Choices and Decisions in Decompressive Surgery for Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disk Herniation. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2018, 48, 169–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Braund, K.G.; Taylor, T.K.F.; Ghosh, P.; Sherwood, A.A. Lateral Spinal Decompression in the Dog. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1976, 17, 583–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Cook, J.R., Jr. Decompressive Procedures. Indications and Techniques. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 1992, 22, 917–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jeffery, N.D.; Freeman, P.M. The Role of Fenestration in Management of Type I Thoracolumbar Disk Degeneration. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2018, 48, 187–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Freeman, P.; Jeffery, N.D. Re-Opening the Window on Fenestration as a Treatment for Acute Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation in Dogs. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2017, 58, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bartels, K.E. Use of the Holmium Yttrium Aluminum Ganet Laser for Percutaneous Ablation of Thoracolumbar Discs in Dogs: A His-torical Summary. Photon Lasers Med. 2012, 1, 75–80. [Google Scholar]
  54. McKee, M. Intervertabral Disc Disease in the Dog 2. Management Options. Practice 2000, 22, 458–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Seim, H.B. Thoracolumbar Disk Disease-Diagnosis Treatment and Prognosis. Canine Pract. 1995, 20, 8–13. [Google Scholar]
  56. Moore, S.A.; Tipold, A.; Olby, N.J.; Stein, V.; Granger, N. Current Approaches to the Management of Acute Thoracolumbar Disc Extrusion in Dogs. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hall, J.F.; Freeman, P. Approach to and Practice of Disc Fenestration in the Management of Intervertebral Disc Extrusions in Dogs: A Questionnaire Survey. Vet. Comp. Orthop. Traumatol. 2021, 34, 437–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wagner, S.D.; Ferguson, H.R.; Leipold, H.; Guffy, M.M.; Butler, H.C. Radiographic and Histologic Changes After Thoracolumbar Disc Curettage. Vet. Surg. 1987, 16, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Küpper, W.; Bruchmüller, K.; Persdorf, T. Percutaneous Partial Diskectomy in the Dog—An Alternative to Surgical Disk Fenestration [Die PerkutanePartielleDiskektomieBeim Hund–Eine Alternative ZurOperativenDiskusfenestration]. Tierarztl. Prax. 1989, 17, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Butterworth, S.J.; Denny, H.R. Follow Up Study of 100 Cases with Thoraclumbar Disk Protrusion by Lateral Fenestration. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1991, 32, 443–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Scott, H.W.; Mckee, W.M. Laminectomy for 34 Dogs with Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disc Disease and Loss of Deep Pain Perception. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1999, 40, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ito, D.; Matsunaga, S.; Jeffery, N.D.; Sasaki, N.; Nishimura, R.; Mochizuki, M.; Kasahara, M.; Fujiwara, R.; Ogawa, H. Prognostic Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Dogs with Paraplegia Caused by Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disk Extrusion: 77 Cases (2000–2003). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2005, 227, 1454–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Moissonnier, P.; Meheust, P.; Carozzo, C. Thoracolumbar Lateral Corpectomy for Treatment of Chronic Disk Herniation: Technique Description and Use in 15 Dogs. Vet. Surg. 2004, 33, 620–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Flegel, T.; Boettcher, I.C.; Ludewig, E.; Kiefer, I.; Oechtering, G.; Boettcher, P. Partial Lateral Corpectomy of the Thoracolumbar Spine in 51 Dogs: Assessment of Slot Morphometry and Spinal Cord Decompression. Vet. Surg. 2011, 40, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Saitoh, Y.; Aikawa, T.; Miyazaki, Y.; Nishimura, M. Long-Term Outcome After Surgical Resection of a Spinal Choroid Plexus Tumor in a Dog. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 2021, 57, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Aikawa, T.; Shibata, M.; Asano, M.; Yasushi, H.; Tagawa, M.; Orima, H. A Comparison of Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disc Extrusion in French Bulldogs and Dachshunds and Association With Congenital Vertebral Anomalies. Vet. Surg. 2014, 43, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Harris, G.; Freeman, P. Introduction of Disc Material into the Vertebral Canal by Fenestration of Thoracolumbar Discs Following Decompressive Surgery. Vet. Comp. Orthop. Traumatol. 2020, 33, 66–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. McCartney, W. Partial Pediculectomy for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Disc Disease. Vet. Comp. Orthop. Traumatol. 1997, 10, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kamishina, H.; Nakano, Y.; Nozue, Y.; Nakata, K.; Kimura, S.; Drury, A.G.; Maeda, S. Microendoscopic Mini-Hemilaminectomy and Discectomy in Acute Thoracolumbar Disc Extrusion Dogs: A Pilot Study. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Joaquim, J.G.F.; Luna, S.P.L.; Brondani, J.T.; Torelli, S.R.; Rahal, S.C.; de Paula Freitas, F. Comparison of Decompressive Surgery, Electroacupuncture, and Decompressive Surgery Followed by Electroacupuncture for the Treatment of Dogs with Intervertebral Disk Disease with Long-Standing Severe Neurologic Deficits. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2010, 236, 1225–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Guevar, J.; Olby, N. Minimally Invasive Microsurgical Decompression of an Intervertebral Disc Protrusion in a Dog. Vet. Surg. 2020, 49, O86–O92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Loughin, C.A.; Dewey, C.W.; Ringwood, P.B.; Pettigrew, R.W.; Kent, M.; Budsberg, S.C. Effect of Durotomy on Functional Outcome of Dogs with Type 1 Thoracolumbar Disc Extrusion and Absent Deep Pain Perception. Vet. Comp. Orthop. Traumatol. 2005, 18, 141–146. [Google Scholar]
  73. Jeffery, N.D. Treatment of Acute and Chronic Thoracolumbar Disk Disease by Mini Hemilaminectomy. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1988, 29, 611–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ruddle, T.L.; Allen, D.A.; Schertel, E.R.; Barnhart, M.D.; Wilson, E.R.; Lineberger, J.A.; Klocke, N.W.; Lehenbauer, T.W. Outcome and Prognostic Factors in Non-Ambulatory Hansen Type I Intervertebral Disc Extrusions: 308 Cases. Vet. Comp. Orthop. Traumatol. 2006, 19, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Penning, V.; Platt, S.R.; Dennis, R.; Cappello, R.; Adams, V. Association of Spinal Cord Compression Seen on Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Clinical Outcome in 67 Dogs with Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disc Extrusion. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2006, 47, 644–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Aikawa, T.; Fujita, H.; Kanazono, S.; Shibata, M.; Yoshigae, Y. Long-Term Neurologic Outcome of Hemilaminectomy and Disk Fenestration for Treatment of Dogs with Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disk Herniation: 831 Cases (2000–2007). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2012, 241, 1617–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Roach, W.J.; Thomas, M.; Weh, J.M.; Bleedorn, J.; Wells, K. Residual Herniated Disc Material Following Hemilaminectomy in Chondrodystrophic Dogs with Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disc Disease. Vet. Comp. Orthop. Traumatol. 2012, 25, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Svensson, G.; Simonsson, U.S.H.; Danielsson, F.; Schwarz, T. Residual Spinal Cord Compression Following Hemilaminectomy and Mini-Hemilaminectomy in Dogs: A Prospective Randomized Study. Front. Vet. Sci. 2017, 4, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zidan, N.; Sims, C.; Fenn, J.; Williams, K.; Griffith, E.; Early, P.J.; Mariani, C.L.; Munana, K.R.; Guevar, J.; Olby, N.J. A Randomized, Blinded, Prospective Clinical Trial of Postoperative Rehabilitation in Dogs after Surgical Decompression of Acute Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2018, 32, 1133–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Harari, J.; Marks, S.L. Surgical Treatments for Intervertebral Disc Disease. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 1992, 22, 899–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Haudiquet, P. Extented foraminotomy in the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar disk herniation. A retrospective study of 46 cases. Prat. Med. Chir. Anim. 1998, 33, 469–481. [Google Scholar]
  82. Lubbe, A.M.; Kirberger, R.M.; Verstraete, F.J.M. Pediculectomy for Thoracolumbar Spinal Decompression in the Dachshund. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 1994, 30, 233–238. [Google Scholar]
  83. Cardy, T.J.A.; Tzounos, C.E.; Volk, H.A.; De Decker, S. Clinical Characterization of Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Intervertebral Disk Extrusions in English Cocker Spaniels. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2016, 248, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Aikawa, T.; Shibata, M.; Sadahiro, S. Hemilaminectomy and Vertebral Stabilization for Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disc Associated Dynamic Compression in 11 Dogs. Vet. Comp. Orthop. Traumatol. 2013, 26, 498–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Salger, F.; Ziegler, L.; Boettcher, I.C.; Oechtering, G.; Boettcher, P.; Flegel, T. Neurologic Outcome After Thoracolumbar Partial Lateral Corpectomy for Intervertebral Disc Disease in 72 Dogs. Vet. Surg. 2014, 43, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Jeffery, N.D.; Mankin, J.M.; Ito, D.; Boudreau, E.C.; Kerwin, S.C.; Levine, J.M.; Krasnow, M.S.; Andruzzi, M.N.; Alcott, C.J.; Granger, N. Extended Durotomy to Treat Severe Spinal Cord Injury after Acute Thoracolumbar Disc Herniation in Dogs. Vet. Surg. 2020, 49, 884–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Itoh, H.; Hara, Y.; Yoshimi, N.; Harada, Y.; Nezu, Y.; Yogo, T.; Ochi, H.; Hasegawa, D.; Orima, H.; Tagawa, M. A Retrospective Study of Intervertebral Disc Herniation in Dogs in Japan: 297 Cases. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2008, 70, 701–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Bush, W.W.; Tiches, D.M.; Kamprad, C.; Murtaugh, R.J.; Barr, C.S. Functional Outcome Following Hemilaminectomy without Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate for Acute Thoracolumbar Disk Disease in 51 Non-Ambulatory Dogs. J. Vet. Emerg. Crit. Care 2007, 17, 72–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Shores, A.; Cechner, P.E.; Cantwell, H.D.; Wheaton, L.G.; Carlton, W.W. Structural Changes in Thoracolumbar Disks Following Lateral Fenestration A Study of the Radiographic, Histologic, and Histochemical Changes in the Chondrodystrophoid Dog. Vet. Surg. 1985, 14, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Takahashi, F.; Honnami, A.; Toki, M.; Ayako, D.; Fujita, Y.; Hara, Y.; Yamaguchi, S. Effect of Durotomy in Dogs with Thoracolumbar Disc Herniation and without Deep Pain Perception in the Hind Limbs. Vet. Surg. 2020, 49, 860–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ingram, E.A.; Kale, D.C.; Balfour, R.J. Hemilaminectomy for Thoracolumbar Hansen Type I Intervertebral Disk Disease in Ambulatory Dogs With or Without Neurologic Deficits: 39 Cases (2008–2010). Vet. Surg. 2013, 42, 924–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Forterre, F.; Konar, M.; Spreng, D.; Jaggy, A.; Lang, J.; Andre, J.; Lang, J.; Jaggy, A.; Lang, J. Influence of Intervertebral Disc Fenestration at the Herniation Site in Association with Hemilaminectomy on Recurrence in Chondrodystrophic Dogs with Thoracolumbar Disc Disease: A Prospective MRI Study. Vet. Surg. 2008, 37, 399–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Gendreau, C.; Stowater, J.; Menhusen, M. Surgical Treatment of Thoracolumbar Disk Herniation. Vet. Med. Small Anim. Clin. 1976, 71, 1051–1058. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  94. Knapp, D.W.; Pope, E.R.; Hewett, J.E.; Bojrab, M.J. A Retrospective Study of Thoracolumbar Disk Fenestration in Dogs Using a Ventral Approach-160 Cases (1976 to 1986). J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 1990, 26, 543–549. [Google Scholar]
  95. Bartels, K.E.; Creed, J.E.; Yturraspe, D.J. Complications Associated with the Dorsolateral Muscle-Separating Approach for Thoracolumbar Disk Fenestration in the Dog. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1983, 183, 1081–1083. [Google Scholar]
  96. Dallman, M.J.; Moon, M.L.; Giovannitti-Jensen, A. Comparison of the Width of the Intervertebral Disk Space and Radiographic Changes before and after Intervertebral Disk Fenestration in Dogs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1991, 52, 140–145. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  97. Lorinson, D.; Henninger, W.; CzedikEysenberg, T. Neurologic and Radiologic Findings in Follow-up Examinations after Surgical Treatment of Thoracolumbar Discs Disease in 27 Dogs. Wien. Tierarztl. Mon. 1996, 83, 185–188. [Google Scholar]
  98. Cudia, S.P.; Duval, J.M. Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disk Disease in Large, Nonchondrodystrophic Dogs: A Retrospective Study. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 1997, 33, 456–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Prata, R.G. Neurological Treatment of Thoracolumbar Disks-the Rationale and Value of Laminectomy with Concomitant Disk Removal. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 1981, 17, 17–26. [Google Scholar]
  100. Yturraspe, D.J.; Lumb, W.V. A Dorsolateral Muscle Separating Approach for Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disk Fenestration in the Dog. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1973, 162, 1037–1040. [Google Scholar]
  101. Sukhiani, H.R.; Parent, J.M.; Atilola, M.A.; Holmberg, D.L. Intervertebral Disk Disease in Dogs with Signs of Back Pain Alone: 25 Cases (1986–1993). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1996, 209, 1275–1279. [Google Scholar]
  102. Nakama, S.; Taura, Y.; Tabaru, H.; Yasuda, M. A Retrospective Study of Ventral Fenestration for Disk Diseases in Dogs. Vet. Med. Sci. 1993, 55, 781–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Olby, N.; Levine, J.; Harris, T.; Munana, K.; Skeen, T.; Sharp, N. Long-Term Functional Outcome of Dogs with Severe Injuries of the Thoracolumbar Spinal Cord: 87 Cases (1996–2001). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2003, 222, 762–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Yovich, J.C.; Read, R.; Eger, C. Modified Lateral Spinal Decompression in 61 Dogs with Thoracolumbar Disc Protrusion. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1994, 35, 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Muir, P.; Johnson, K.A.; Manley, P.A.; Dueland, R.T. Comparison of Hemilaminectomy and Dorsal Laminectomy for Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disc Extrusion in Dachshunds. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1995, 36, 360–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Scott, H.W.W. Hemilaminectomy for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Disc Disease in the Dog: A Follow-up Study of 40 Cases. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1997, 38, 488–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Dhupa, S.; Glickman, N.; Waters, D.J.J. Reoperative Neurosurgery in Dogs with Thoracolumbar Disc Disease. Vet. Surg. 1999, 28, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Ferreira, A.J.A.; Correia, J.H.D.; Jaggy, A. Thoracolumbar Disc Disease in 71 Paraplegic Dogs: Influence of Rate of Onset and Duration of Clinical Signs on Treatment Results. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2002, 43, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Bartels, K.E.; Higbee, R.G.; Bahr, R.J.; Galloway, D.S.; Healey, T.S.; Arnold, C. Outcome of and Complications Associated with Prophylactic Percutaneous Laser Disk Ablation in Dogs with Thoracolumbar Disk Disease: 277 Cases (1992–2001). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2003, 222, 1733–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kazakos, G.; Polizopoulou, Z.S.; Patsikas, M.N.; Tsimopoulos, G.; Roubies, N.; Dessiris, A. Duration and Severity of Clinical Signs as Prognostic Indicators in 30 Dogs with Thoracolumbar Disk Disease after Surgical Decompression. J. Vet. Med. A Physiol. Pathol. Clin. Med. 2005, 52, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kinzel, S.; Wolff, M.; Buecker, A.; Krombach, G.A.; Stopinski, T.; Afify, M.; Weiss, C.; Kupper, W. Partial Percutaneous Discectomy for Treatment of Thoracolumbar Disc Protrusion: Retrospective Study of 331 Dogs. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2005, 46, 479–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Laitinen, O.M.; Puerto, D.A. Surgical Decompression in Dogs with Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disc Disease and Loss of Deep Pain Perception: A Retrospective Study of 46 Cases. Acta Vet. Scand. 2005, 46, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Sterna, J.; Burzykowski, T. The Assessment of the Usefulness of Hemilaminectomy without Fenestration in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Disc Disease in Chondrodystrophic Dogs. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2007, 10, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  114. Sterna, J.; Burzykowski, T. Assessment of the Usefulness of the Fenestration Method in Cases of Disc Extrusion in the Cervical and Thoraco-Lumbar Spine in Chondrodystrophic Dogs. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2008, 11, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  115. Downes, C.J.; Gemmill, T.J.; Gibbons, S.E.; McKee, W.M. Hemilaminectomy and Vertebral Stabilisation for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Disc Protrusion in 28 Dogs. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2009, 50, 525–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Ferrand, F.-X.; Moissonnier, P.; Filleur, A.; Cachon, T.; Fau, D.; Viguier, E.; Carozzo, C. Thoracolumbar Partial Lateral Corpectomy for the Treatment of Chronic Intervertebral Disc Disease in 107 Dogs. Ir. Vet. J. 2015, 68, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Medl, S.C.; Reese, S.; Medl, N.S. Individualized Mini-Hemilaminectomy-Corpectomy (IMHC) for Treatment of Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation in Large Breed Dogs. Vet. Surg. 2017, 46, 422–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Dugat, D.R.; Bartels, K.E.; Payton, M.E. Recurrence of Disk Herniation Following Percutaneous Laser Disk Ablation in Dogs with a History of Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disk Herniation: 303 Cases (1994–2011). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2016, 249, 1393–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Gordon-Evans, W.J.; Johnson, A.L.; Knap, K.E.; Griffon, D.J. The Effect of Body Condition on Postoperative Recovery of Dachshunds with Intervertebral Disc Disease Treated with Postoperative Physical Rehabilitation. Vet. Surg. 2019, 48, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Crawford, A.H.; de Decker, S. Comparison between Hemilaminectomy with Either Anulectomy or Partial Discectomy for Treatment of Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disc Protrusion in Dogs. Vet. Comp. Orthop. Traumatol. 2018, 31, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Longo, S.; Gomes, S.; Briola, C.; Duffy, K.; Targett, M.; Jeffery, N.; Freeman, P.; Katherine, D.; Targett, M.; Jeffery, N.; et al. Association of Magnetic Resonance Assessed Disc Degeneration and Late Clinical Recurrence in Dogs Treated Surgically for Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disc Extrusions. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2021, 35, 378–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Immekeppel, A.; Rupp, S.; Demierre, S.; Rentmeister, K.; Meyer-Lindenberg, A.; Goessmann, J.; Bali, M.S.; Schmidli-Davies, F.; Forterre, F. Investigation of Timing of Surgery and Other Factors Possibly Influencing Outcome in Dogs with Acute Thoracolumbar Disc Extrusion: A Retrospective Study of 1501 Cases. Acta Vet. Scand. 2021, 63, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Kerr, S.; Crawford, A.H.H.; de Decker, S. Late Onset Recurrence of Clinical Signs after Surgery for Intervertebral Disc Extrusion in French Bulldogs. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2021, 62, 683–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Animals 12 02601 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow chart of this systematic review.
Figure 1. Flow chart of this systematic review.
Animals 12 02601 g001
Animals 12 02601 g002 550
Figure 2. Traffic-light plot of cohort studies [8,15,19,20,21,22,23,24,85,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123].
Figure 2. Traffic-light plot of cohort studies [8,15,19,20,21,22,23,24,85,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123].
Animals 12 02601 g002
Animals 12 02601 g003 550
Figure 3. Summary plot of cohort studies.
Figure 3. Summary plot of cohort studies.
Animals 12 02601 g003
Animals 12 02601 g004 550
Figure 4. Traffic-light plot of clinical trials [8,21].
Figure 4. Traffic-light plot of clinical trials [8,21].
Animals 12 02601 g004
Animals 12 02601 g005 550
Figure 5. Summary plot of clinical trials.
Figure 5. Summary plot of clinical trials.
Animals 12 02601 g005
Animals 12 02601 g006 550
Figure 6. Meta-analysis for recurrence ratio (with prophylactic fenestrations; without prophylactic fenestration) [19,21,24,104,105].
Figure 6. Meta-analysis for recurrence ratio (with prophylactic fenestrations; without prophylactic fenestration) [19,21,24,104,105].
Animals 12 02601 g006
Animals 12 02601 g007 550
Figure 7. Meta-analysis for recurrence ratio on disc(s) adjacent to surgically treated area (with prophylactic fenestration; without prophylactic fenestration) [19,24,104].
Figure 7. Meta-analysis for recurrence ratio on disc(s) adjacent to surgically treated area (with prophylactic fenestration; without prophylactic fenestration) [19,24,104].
Animals 12 02601 g007
Table
Table 1. PICO.
Table 1. PICO.
PICOInclusion Criteria
PopulationDogs with TL IVDH of all breeds and ages
Intervention/controlSurgically treated with and/or without PF
Primary outcomeFollow-up of the canines
Recurrence of clinical signs at TL area (confirmed or suspected)
Secondary outcome Complications related with PF
OthersRetrospective, prospective, case series, clinical trials studies
Studies in English
P: population, I: intervention, C: control, O: outcome; PF: prophylactic fenestration; TL: thoracolumbar; IVDH: intervertebral disc herniation.
Table
Table 2. Studies included in the systematic review.
Table 2. Studies included in the systematic review.
Author, YearType of StudyNumber of DogsNumber of Dogs without/with PF
Funkquist, 1978 [23]Retrospective study880/88
Davies and Sharp, 1983 [20]Prospective study340/34
Yovich et al., 1994 M [104]Retrospective study6142/19
Muir et al., 1995 M [105]Retrospective study9386/7
Dickey et al., 1996 [15]Prospective case series330/33
Scott, 1997 [106]Retrospective study4040/0
Dhupa et al., 1999 [107]Retrospective study467467/0
Ferreira, 2002 [108]Retrospective study710/71
Bartels et al., 2003 [109]Retrospective study2770/277
Brisson et al., 2004 M [24]Retrospective study26542/215
Mayhew et al., 2004 [22]Retrospective study229229/0
Kazakos et al., 2005 [110]Retrospective study3030/0
Kinzel et al., 2005 [111]Retrospective study331162/169
Laitinen et al., 2005 [112]Retrospective study4646/0
Sterna et al., 2007 [113]Retrospective study3636/0
Sterna et al., 2008 [114]Retrospective study260/26
Downes et al., 2009 [115]Retrospective study2828/0
Brisson et al., 2011 M [21]Randomized clinical trial207103/104
Aikawa et al., 2012 M [19]Retrospective study79334/759
Salger et al., 2014 [85]Retrospective study7272/0
Ferrand et al., 2005 [116]Retrospective study107107/0
Medl et al., 2017 [117]Prospective study5757/0
Dugat et al., 2016 [118]Retrospective study3030/303
Crawford et al., 2018 [119]Retrospective study5353/0
Gordon-Evans et al., 2018 [120]Retrospective study3232/0
Longo et al., 2020 [121]Retrospective study9292/0
Immekeppel et al., 2021 [122]Retrospective study15011422/23 confirmed (56 of unspecified medical history)
S. Kerr et al., 2021 [123]Retrospective
study		5533/22
Irizarry et al., 2022 [8]Blinded control
study		300/30
M Studies included in the meta-analysis; PF: prophylactic fenestration.
Table
Table 3. Summary of the recurrent cases.
Table 3. Summary of the recurrent cases.
Author/YearRecurrent/Surgically Treated DogsConfirmed (without/with PF)Suspected (without/with PF)
Funkquist et al., 1978 [23]14/887 (0/7)7 (0/7)
Davies et al., 1983 [20]0/34--
Yovich et al., 1994 [104]8/613(2/1)5 (3/2)
Muir et al., 1995 [105]5/935 (4/1)-
Dickey et al., 1996 [15]5/332 (0/2)3 (0/3)
Scott, 1997 [106]5/401(1/0)4 (4/0)
Dhupa et al., 1999 [107]30/46730 (30/0)-
Ferreira et al., 2002 [108]9/71-9 (0/9)
Bartels et al., 2003 [109]9/2778 (0/8)1 (0/1)
Brisson et al., 2004 [24]29/26511 (2/9)18 (5/13)
Mayhew et al., 2004 [22]44/22920 (20/0)24 (24/0)
Kazakos et al., 2005 [110]0/30 --
Kinzel et al., 2005 [111]2/3312 (2/0)-
Laitinen et al., 2005 [112]2/461 (1/0)1 (1/0)
Sterna et al., 2007 [113]8/363 (3/0)5 (5/0)
Sterna et al., 2008 [114]5/260 5 (0/5)
Downes et al., 2009 [115]2/282 (2/0)-
Brisson et al., 2011 [21]55/20724 (17/7)31 (18/13)
Aikawa et al., 2012 [19]81/79315 (1/14)66 (not recorded)
Salger et al., 2014 [54]11/723 (3/0)8 (8/0)
Ferrand et al., 2015 [116]25/10710 (10/0)15 (15/0)
Dugat et al., 2016 [118]60/30311 (0/11)49 (0/49)
Medl et al., 2017 [117]7/575 (5/0)2 (2/0)
Crawford et al., 2018 [119]19/53-19 (19/0)
Gordon-Evans et al., 2019 [120]0/32--
Longo et al., 2021 [121]33/928 (8/0)25 (25/0)
Immekeppel et al., 2021 [122]10/1501-10 (not recorded)
Kerr et al., 2021 [123]24/55-24 (not recorded)
Irizarry et al., 2022 [8]2/301 (0/1)1 (0/1)
PF: prophylactic fenestration.
Table
Table 4. Recurrence of intervertebral disc herniation cranially to the primary surgically treated site.
Table 4. Recurrence of intervertebral disc herniation cranially to the primary surgically treated site.
Author/YearDecompressive Surgical Site(s)IVD Space of Recurrence
Yovich et al., 1994 [104]L1-5T13-L1 +
Muir et al., 1995 [105]T13-L4T11-12 +
Scott, 1997 [106]T12-13T11-12
Dhupa et al., 1999 [107]T13-L1
T12-13 *
T13-L1 *
L3-4
L1-2
L2-3		T11-12
T11-12 *
T11-12 *
T11-12
T13-L1
T13-L1
Sterna et al., 2007 [113]T12-13L1-2
Brisson et al., 2004 [24]L1-2T11-12 +
Aikawa et al., 2012 [19]T11-L2T10-11+
* Two recurrence episodes recorded, + dogs in group with prophylactic fenestration.
Table
Table 5. Number and sites of recurrences on IVD spaces on caudal lumbar area.
Table 5. Number and sites of recurrences on IVD spaces on caudal lumbar area.
Author/YearL3-4L4-5L5-6
Dhupa et al., 1999 [107]32
Brisson et al., 2004 * [24]15
Downes et al., 2009 [115]1
Brisson et al., 2011 * [21] 31
Aikawa et al., 2012 * [19]52
Longo et al., 2021 [121] 2
* Recurrences in prophylactically fenestrated dogs.
Table
Table 6. Complications associated with PF (number of dogs).
Table 6. Complications associated with PF (number of dogs).
Author/YearComplications
Funkquist, 1978 [23]Spinal cord damage (3); discospondylitis (1)
Bartels et al., 2003 [109]Mild pneumothorax (1); abscess at needle insertion site (1); proprioceptive deficits (3); discospondylitis (1)
Dickey et al., 1996 [15]Minimal hemorrhages from needle insertion
Brisson et al., 2004 [24]Mild pneumothorax (1); fatal hemothorax (1)
Kinzel et al., 2005 [111]Pneumothorax (1);
Discospondylitis (1)
Brisson et al., 2011 [21]Remaining disc material (1); vertebral sinus hemorrhage (3); vertebral artery hemorrhage (7); nerve root trauma causing abdominal weakness (4); curette tip breakage within disc space (1)
Aikawa et al., 2012 [19]Vertebral instability or subluxation at the site of hemilaminectomy with PF (3)
Dugat et al., 2016 [118]Hematoma formation at needle insertion site (1); post-surgical ataxia (6); soreness along the back (4); greater pain than expected (2); reluctance to move (2); pain on palpation in the spinal region (1); licking and chewing at the left hind paw (1)
Sterna et al., 2008 [114]Exacerbated neurological deficits post-surgery (1); wound infection (1); death due to uraemia (1)
Immekeppel et al., 2022 [122]Exacerbated neurological deficits (10) (intervention group not specified)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pontikaki, A.E.; Pavlidou, K.; Polizopoulou, Z.; Savvas, I.; Kazakos, G. Prophylactic Effect of Fenestration on the Recurrence of Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disc Disease in Dogs. Animals 2022, 12, 2601. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12192601

AMA Style

Pontikaki AE, Pavlidou K, Polizopoulou Z, Savvas I, Kazakos G. Prophylactic Effect of Fenestration on the Recurrence of Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disc Disease in Dogs. Animals. 2022; 12(19):2601. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12192601

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pontikaki, Afroditi E., Kiriaki Pavlidou, Zoe Polizopoulou, Ioannis Savvas, and George Kazakos. 2022. "Prophylactic Effect of Fenestration on the Recurrence of Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disc Disease in Dogs" Animals 12, no. 19: 2601. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12192601

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop