Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol., 10 May 2021
Sec. Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgical Oncology
This article is part of the Research Topic Intraoperative fluorescence imaging and diagnosis in central and peripheral nervous system tumors: established applications and future perspectives View all 14 articles

Optical Characterization of Sodium Fluorescein In Vitro and Ex Vivo

Ran Xu*&#x;Ran Xu1*†Wanda Teich&#x;Wanda Teich1†Florian FrenzelFlorian Frenzel2Katrin HoffmannKatrin Hoffmann2Josefine Radke,,Josefine Radke3,4,5Judith RslerJudith Rösler1Katharina FaustKatharina Faust1Anne BlankAnne Blank1Susan BrandenburgSusan Brandenburg1Martin MischMartin Misch1Peter VajkoczyPeter Vajkoczy1Julia Sophie Onken,&#x;Julia Sophie Onken1,4‡Ute Resch-Genger&#x;Ute Resch-Genger2‡
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
  • 2Division Biophotonics, Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), Berlin, Germany
  • 3Department of Neuropathology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
  • 4German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany, partner site Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • 5Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany

Objective: The utilization of fluorescein-guided biopsies and resection has been recently discussed as a suitable strategy to improve and expedite operative techniques for the resection of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. However, little is known about the optical properties of sodium fluorescein (NaFl) in human tumor tissue and their potential impact on ex vivo analyses involving fluorescence-based methods.

Methods: Tumor tissue was obtained from a study cohort of an observational study on the utilization of fluorescein-guided biopsy and resection (n=5). The optical properties of fluorescein-stained tissue were compared to the optical features of the dye in vitro and in control samples consisting of tumor tissue of high-grade glioma patients (n=3) without intravenous (i.v.) application of NaFl. The dye-exposed tumor tissues were used for optical measurements to confirm the detectability of NaFl emission ex vivo. The tissue samples were fixed in 4%PFA, immersed in 30% sucrose, embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT compound, and cut to 10 μm cryosections. Spatially resolved emission spectra from tumor samples were recorded on representative slides with a Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope FV1000 (Olympus GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) upon excitation with λexc = 488 nm.

Results: Optical measurements of fluorescein in 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl) under in vitro conditions showed an absorption maximum of λmax abs = 479 nm as detected with spectrophotometer Specord 200 and an emission peak at λmax em = 538 nm recorded with the emCCD detection system of a custom-made microscope-based single particle setup using a 500 nm long-pass filter. Further measurements revealed pH- and concentration-dependent emission spectra of NaFl. Under ex vivo conditions, confocal laser scanning microscopy of fluorescein tumor samples revealed a slight bathochromic shift and a broadening of the emission band.

Conclusion: Tumor uptake of NaFl leads to changes in the optical properties – a bathochromic shift and broadening of the emission band – possibly caused by the dye’s high pH sensitivity and concentration-dependent reabsorption acting as an inner filter of the dye’s emission, particularly in the short wavelength region of the emission spectrum where absorption and fluorescence overlap. Understanding the ex vivo optical properties of fluorescein is crucial for testing and validating its further applicability as an optical probe for intravital microscopy, immunofluorescence localization studies, and flow cytometry analysis.

Introduction

The utilization of fluorescein as an optical probe for guiding the resection and biopsy of central nervous system (CNS) tumors has been recently proposed as a powerful strategy to improve and expedite operative techniques (14). Sodium fluorescein (NaFl) is a fluorescent dye with a molecular weight of 376.3 g/mol that accumulates in tumor tissue where blood brain barrier (BBB) breakdown occurs and thus, enhances tumor visualization, contributing to the extent of resection which is in turn associated with a better overall survival rate (59). This dye has been successfully implemented in clinical applications in ophthalmology; in recent years, its implications for CNS tumor resection, as well as for vascular neurosurgery techniques have also been discussed (1013).

However, little is known about the spectroscopic characteristics of fluorescein after its intravenous (i.v.) application, as it traverses the BBB and accumulates in tumor tissue. The tumor microenvironment is a complex compartment with spatiotemporal variability in tumor cells, acidity, hypoxia, secreted factors, and extracellular matrix proteins. Moreover, it is unknown how the dye is metabolized in this environment. This encouraged us to characterize the in vitro and ex vivo optical characteristics of NaFl to understand its spectroscopic features after biological tissue uptake with special emphasis on its potential further implications of fluorescent-based assays.

Material and Methods

Patients and Specimen Handling

The study was approved by the local Ethical Committee (EA1/284/20, EA4/219/17 and EA2/101/08) of the Charité University Hospital. All patients gave written consent for the off-label use of i.v. fluorescein-guided surgery or biopsy. All study patients had a contrast-enhancing lesion in which surgical resection was indicated, and their characteristics are listed in Table 1. The workflow of the experimental setup of human tissue is shown in Figure 1. Briefly, patients received intraoperatively a dosage of 5 mg/kg Fluorescein Alkon i.v. according to our standardized operating procedure for brain tumor surgery (n=5). Tumor surgery was performed in a standard fashion using the Pentero 900 microscope with Y560 filter, Carl Zeiss, Meditec, Oberkochen, Germany. The dye-exposed tumor tissue was brought to the laboratory on ice, and immediately fixed in 4% PFA overnight at 4°C, then immersed in 30% sucrose, and embedded in Tissue-Tek® O.C.T.™ compound. Cryosections were cut into slices of 10 μm thickness. Control samples (n=3) consisted of glioma tumor samples from patients who did not receive fluorescein-guided surgery due to contraindications. Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E) staining was performed using a standard methodology and staining reagents. Images were collected using a Carl Zeiss Axio observer Z1 inverted immunofluorescence microscope equipped with standard DAPI (filter 49, excitation 365 nm, emission 445 ± 25nm), FITC (filter 38, excitation 470 ± 20nm, emission 525 ± 25nm nm), and Cy3 (filter 43, excitation 545 ± 12.5nm, emission 605 ± 35nm) filters, respectively.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Patient characteristics.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Experimental workflow. Before tumor resection, patients received sodium fluorescein (NaFl) intravenously (i.v.). After fixation in 4% PFA and 30% sucrose immersion, the NaFl-stained tissue was embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT before cryosectioning. Frozen sections were then studied by fluorescence microscopy and spectroscopy measurements.

Spectroscopy of NaFl In Vitro

The absorbance spectrum of fluorescein in 0.9% NaCl was measured in a cuvette with the spectrophotometer Specord 200. The emission spectrum of fluorescein in 0.9% NaCl under 488 nm laser excitation (Supercontinuum Laser Solea, PicoQuant) was recorded with a custom-made microscope-based single particle setup equipped with a 500 nm long-pass filter using the emCCD detection system (DU970P-BVF, Andor Ltd.).

Concentration- and pH-dependent emission spectra of NaFl in vitro were recorded using a spectral scanning Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (CLSM) FluoView FV1000 (Olympus GmbH, Hamburg, Germany). The emission spectra were measured in droplets of the corresponding NaFl solutions, which were placed on standard microscopy coverslips #1.5 (0.170 mm). A multiline argon ion laser (30 mW) was used as excitation source (λexc = 488 nm), which was reflected by a beam splitter (BS 20/80) and focused onto the sample through an Olympus objective UPLSAPO 20x (numerical aperture N.A. 0.75). The emitted photons were collected with the same objective, focused onto a photomultiplier (PMT), and recorded in the wavelength range of 500 - 640 nm (spectral resolution of 2.0 nm, step sizes of 2.0 nm).

Spectroscopy of NaFl Ex Vivo

Spatially resolved emission spectra of tumor samples were recorded on representative tumor sections. Exemplarily chosen, but representative 10 regions of interests (ROIs) within the tumor tissue and one additional ROI as a blank or baseline control (recording background noise) were measured with the FV1000 (Olympus GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) upon excitation with λexc = 488 nm under almost the same experimental settings and conditions as described above. The ex vivo spectra, however, were measured in derogation through an objective UPLSAPO 20xW/0.75 in the range of 500 nm - 740 nm (spectral resolution of 5.0 nm and step sizes of 2.0 nm).

Statistical Analysis and Figures

Values are generally presented as mean +/- SEM unless otherwise stated. Statistical significance was determined by Student t-test and statistical analysis was performed using Graphpad Prism software (Version 7.0). Elements of Figures 1 and 5 were composed using BioRender.Com.

Results

NaFl Tumor Samples Show Positive Signal in Both Green and Red Channels

To examine whether NaFl tumor tissue still showed measurable FITC signal after fixation, frozen sections were analyzed in the FITC channel of a fluorescent microscope. Indeed, all the samples exhibited a heterogeneous pattern of FITC signal (Figure 2). To clarify that the area of interest was in fact vital tumor tissue, consecutive sections were subjected to Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E) staining and examined by a consultant neuropathologist to confirm the histopathological diagnosis of the rapid frozen sections (Figure 2). However, all samples showed also fluorescence signals in the CY3 channel (Figure 2). This observation was surprising since NaFl should not reveal a signal in the CY3 channel separated by the CY3 filter (covering the emission wavelength region of 605 ± 35nm by its transmission profile) under baseline ex vivo conditions. The observed changes in the spectroscopic features of NaFl might be of significant relevance in the future, e.g. for the in-depth analysis of in vivo tumor imaging using NaFl. To better understand this shift in emission wavelength we performed a series of in vitro and ex vivo studies to characterize the optical properties of our optical probe.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of rapid sections in three different pathologies [A, B-cell lymphoma, B, glioblastoma, and C, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD)] with consecutive slides using FITC and CY3 filters of an immunofluorescence microscope. All samples showed signals in the FITC channel, and unexpectedly, also in the CY3 channel (scale bar = 100 µm).

Absorbance and Emission of NaFl In Vitro

Next, to elucidate the optical properties of NaFl in vitro, we measured absorbance and emission spectra of NaFl under in vitro conditions. Here, we observed a typical absorbance peak at λmax abs = 479 nm and an emission peak at λmax em = 538 nm (Figure 3A). These absorbance and emission maxima match well with the previously reported spectroscopic features of fluorescein (14).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Absorbance and emission of NaFl in vitro and ex vivo. (A) Absorbance (black line) and emission spectra (red line) under in vitro conditions show the typical maximum absorbance at λmax abs = 479 nm and an emission peak at λmax em = 538 nm. (B) Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) emission spectra of NaFl in phosphate buffer solution at pH 8.04 in vitro (blue dashed line) and in ex vivo samples (colored solid lines). Exemplary, but representative ex vivo tumor samples with NaFl show a broadened, bathochromically shifted NaFl tumor emission (solid lines). A broad but very weak emission in the same wavelength region was also observed for the control samples. (C, D) Exemplary, but representative CLSM intensities of 10 regions of interests (ROIs) read out at 540 nm show a significantly higher signal in fluorescein tumor samples (971.1 ± 146.1 a.u.) versus control samples (530.6 ± 67.58 a.u.); p= 0.0441. Values are expressed in average ± S.E.M. (Scale bar = 100 µm).

Fluorescein-Stained Tumor Tissue Shows a Bathochromic Shift in Emission Ex Vivo

We next compared the in vitro emission spectra of NaFl to the corresponding emission spectra obtained ex vivo to better understand the optical behavior of this dye within the tumor core. Interestingly, in representative tumor samples, we observed a broadening of the dye’s emission band and a slight, but significant spectral shift to longer wavelengths, also known as a bathochromic shift, compared to NaFl in buffer solution pH 8.04 in vitro (Figure 3B). The control samples showed a significantly lower emission intensity with a mean intensity of 530.6 (± 67.58) a.u. [= arbitrary (or relative) units] compared to 971.1 (± 146.1) a.u. at a wavelength of 540 nm in the NaFl tumor samples (p=0.0441) (Figures 3C, D).

pH-Dependent and Concentration-Dependent Emission

Since NaFl showed heterogeneous uptake in tumor tissue, we examined whether this finding could be explained by the characteristic pH-dependent emission features of the dye - also given that previous studies highlighted an acidic milieu of the tumor microenvironment contributing to a change in pH (15, 16). Therefore, we measured the absorbance spectra of NaFl in 0.9% NaCl solution and its emission spectra in different phosphate buffers (pH 5.54, pH 7.35, and pH 8.04). Our results reveal the well-known pH-dependence of the NaFl emission intensity that increases with increasing pH (Figure 4A) (17). Also, the heterogeneous uptake of the dye leading to different local NaFl concentrations could contribute to the spectroscopic effects observed ex vivo. Hence, we measured the spectra of NaFl in vitro at different dye concentrations. Thereby, we noticed not only a concentration-dependent emission intensity of the dye (Figures 4B, C), but also observed a red shift in the emission maxima with increasing NaFl concentrations (Figure 4D).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 pH- and concentration-dependent emission of NaFl. (A) Normalized absorbance (in 0.9% NaCl solution; dashed line) and pH dependent emission spectra of NaFl solutions in different phosphate buffers (phosphate buffer pH 5.54, pH 7.35, and pH 8.04) obtained with a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). (B) Concentration series of Na-Fl solutions (in 0.9% NaCl), and (C) the corresponding absorbance (in 0.9% NaCl solution; dashed line), and concentration-dependent CLSM emission spectra (solid lines). (D) Emission maxima λmax [nm] plotted against NaFl concentration [%] show a concentration-dependent red shift by about 5 nm.

Discussion

Our results show that NaFl exhibits a significant broadening of its emission band together with a bathochromic shift after tissue uptake in CNS tumor samples. These changes could possibly be explained by the dye’s high pH sensitivity and/or concentration-dependent reabsorption effects (Figure 5).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5 Emission spectroscopy of sodium fluorescein (NaFl) under in vitro and ex vivo conditions. Exposure of NaFl to the tumor microenvironment shows a broadening and a bathochromic shift of the dye’s emission spectrum. The pH sensitivity and the concentration-dependent reabsorption effect of the dye contribute to this red shift.

Furthermore, our data reveal a very heterogeneous distribution pattern of NaFl in tumor tissue on a microscopic level. This can also be observed intraoperatively by the neurosurgeon on a macroscopic scale. Traditionally, a heterogeneous uptake can be related to a variability in BBB properties and regionally distinct hyperpermeability. Our data show that this heterogeneous emission signal of the dye is also influenced by the dye’s high pH sensitivity, potentially caused by the variability of the acidic milieu in the tumor microenvironment. This acidic milieu has also been discussed in the literature as a driver of cancer development (15). The fluorescein molecule can exist in different protonation states which all differ in their fluorescence features; only the dianion and monoanion of fluorescein emit a visible fluorescence of varying fluorescence efficiency or quantum yield while the neutral dye is non-emissive (17). A more acidic extracellular milieu should lead to the formation of the monoanion while a more basic environment favors the formation of the dye’s dianion. This goes along with the pH-dependent emission spectra found for the dye in different buffer solutions. Moreover, the heterogeneous appearance of NaFl uptake in tumor tissue is likely caused by the high sensitivity of the NaFl emission behavior to its concentration. This corresponds with the observed decrease in fluorescence intensity with higher local dye concentration due to reabsorption effects. Our data confirm earlier reports that both the pH of the dye’s local environment as well as dye concentration can affect the emission of NaFl, which could explain the findings of our ex vivo optical measurements, showing a red shift in fluorescence (18, 19).

The change in the intrinsic spectroscopic properties of fluorophores including spectral shifts and changes in the shape of fluorescence emission spectra caused by different environments have been reported before, and the tumor microenvironment is a complex system with a considerable variability in tumor cells, acidity, secretomes, and extracellular compartments that can likely cause changes in the dye’s spectroscopic features (4). For example, another study also reported a bathochromic shift for fluorescein ligands bound to rabbit polyclonal anti-Fluorescein Fab fragments (20).

Tumor tissue autofluorescence is a common phenomenon that should be considered, specifically when working with fluorescence-based assays. Some studies even suggest to utilize the spectral characteristics of the autofluorescence signals from glioma cells for diagnostic purposes (21, 22). To verify that autofluorescence signals do not potentially resemble or interfere with the NaFl signal, we measured the emission spectra of native tumor tissue without exposure to NaFl under the same conditions as used for the NaFl measurements. Although this experiment revealed a broad emission band in the green and red wavelength region, control tumor tissue showed only a very weak emission signal compared to the NaFl-stained tumor samples.

Since NaFl has been increasingly used for the guidance of brain tumor resection, it is crucial to understand its ex vivo optical properties, since they can impact further in-depth in vivo imaging analyses as well as fluorescence-based assays such as FACS analyses, immunofluorescence staining or in vivo microscopy (23, 24). The observation in our study that NaFl in tumor tissue revealed signals in the longer wavelength CY3 channel was surprising. The practical implication of these spectral changes is that if further fluorescence-based laboratory studies are conducted on CNS tumor tissue which were resected under fluorescein-guidance, labeling with secondary antibodies using dyes emitting in the FITC or Cy3 channel should be used with care as this can result in spectral interferences and crosstalk. Based on the broadening and bathochromic shift of the emission band, it seems to be more reasonable to switch to secondary antibodies labeled with dyes emitting in the blue (e.g. 350 – 408 nm) or preferably in the far red (630 – 647 nm) and near-IR channels (650 – 750 nm) in assays such as immunofluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. The implications of the observed changes in optical properties are of relevant nature, especially if these fluorescent-based assays are used for further diagnostic purposes. Furthermore, in the clinical setting, the utilization of NaFl in combination with in-depth in vivo and ex vivo imaging techniques such as confocal laser endomicroscopy has also been discussed in recent studies in aiding histopathological diagnoses (25, 26). Hence, the increasing role of NaFl in such settings poses increasing interest on NaFl tumor kinetics, and further analysis of its spectroscopic features may help to distinguish its free form from fluorescein metabolites (fluorescein glucuronide).

In summary, our data reveal changes of the spectroscopic properties of NaFl ex vivo, particularly a bathochromic shift in emission after tumor uptake, underpinning that the widespread use of fluorescein in neurosurgical procedures requires a detailed study of its optical properties in a clinical setting. Our study is, however, limited by a small sample size, heterogeneity in tumor histology, and the absence of in vivo pharmacokinetic properties of NaFl. Further studies are needed to fully understand the exact nature of the changes of the spectroscopic properties of NaFl ex vivo and related possible interference with other fluorescence-based assays in tumor tissue.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Charité’s Ethics Committee. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

WT, KH, FF, JoR, AB, SB, and RX conducted experiments and analyzed data. RX, JO, and UR-G designed the study. All authors contributed to writing and revising of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

RX is supported by the BIH-Charité Clinician Scientist Program funded by the Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin and the Berlin Institute of Health. We acknowledge support from the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Open Access Publication Fund of Charité—Universitaétsmedizin Berlin.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The reviewer JG declared a past co-authorship with the authors to the handling editor.

Acknowledgments

We kindly thank Jimmy LaPrelle for proofreading the manuscript.

References

1. Acerbi F, Broggi M, Schebesch KM, Hohne J, Cavallo C, De Laurentis C, et al. Fluorescein-Guided Surgery for Resection of High-Grade Gliomas: A Multicentric Prospective Phase II Study (FLUOGLIO). Clin Cancer Res (2018) 24:52–61. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1184

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Rey-Dios R, Hattab EM, Cohen-Gadol AA. Use of Intraoperative Fluorescein Sodium Fluorescence to Improve the Accuracy of Tissue Diagnosis During Stereotactic Needle Biopsy of High-Grade Gliomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) (2014) 156:1071–5. doi: 10.1007/s00701-014-2097-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Stummer W, Novotny A, Stepp H, Goetz C, Bise K, Reulen HJ. Fluorescence-Guided Resection of Glioblastoma Multiforme by Using 5-Aminolevulinic Acid-Induced Porphyrins: A Prospective Study in 52 Consecutive Patients. J Neurosurg (2000) 93:1003–13. doi: 10.3171/jns.2000.93.6.1003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Hohne J, Acerbi F, Falco J, Akcakaya MO, Schmidt NO, Kiris T, et al. Lighting Up the Tumor-Fluorescein-Guided Resection of Gangliogliomas. J Clin Med (2020) 9:2405. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082405

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney DR, Gokaslan ZL, Shi W, DeMonte F, et al. A Multivariate Analysis of 416 Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme: Prognosis, Extent of Resection, and Survival. J Neurosurg (2001) 95:190–8. doi: 10.3171/jns.2001.95.2.0190

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. 2McGirt MJ, Chaichana KL, Gathinji M, Attenello FJ, Than K, Olivi A, et al. Independent Association of Extent of Resection With Survival in Patients With Malignant Brain Astrocytoma. J Neurosurg (2009) 110:156–62. doi: 10.3171/2008.4.17536

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Brown TJ, Brennan MC, Li M, Church EW, Brandmeir NJ, Rakszawski KL, et al. Association of the Extent of Resection With Survival in Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Oncol (2016) 2:1460–9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1373

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Stummer W, Reulen HJ, Meinel T, Pichlmeier U, Schumacher W, Tonn JC, et al. Extent of Resection and Survival in Glioblastoma Multiforme: Identification of and Adjustment for Bias. Neurosurgery (2008) 62:564–76; discussion 564-76. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000317304.31579.17

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Diaz RJ, Dios RR, Hattab EM, Burrell K, Rakopoulos P, Sabha N, et al. Study of the Biodistribution of Fluorescein in Glioma-Infiltrated Mouse Brain and Histopathological Correlation of Intraoperative Findings in High-Grade Gliomas Resected Under Fluorescein Fluorescence Guidance. J Neurosurg (2015) 122:1360–9. doi: 10.3171/2015.2.JNS132507

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Schebesch KM, Brawanski A, Hohenberger C, Hohne J. Fluorescein Sodium-Guided Surgery of Malignant Brain Tumors: History, Current Concepts, and Future Project. Turk Neurosurg (2016) 26:185–94. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.16952-16.0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Zhao X, Belykh E, Cavallo C, Valli D, Gandhi S, Preul MC, et al. Application of Fluorescein Fluorescence in Vascular Neurosurgery. Front Surg (2019) 6:52. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2019.00052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Ward KW. Superficial Punctate Fluorescein Staining of the Ocular Surface. Optom Vis Sci (2008) 85:8–16. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31815ed756

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Desmettre T, Devoisselle JM, Mordon S. Fluorescence Properties and Metabolic Features of Indocyanine Green (ICG) as Related to Angiography. Surv Ophthalmol (2000) 45:15–27. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6257(00)00123-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Sjoback R, Nygren J, Kubista M. Characterization of Fluorescein-Oligonucleotide Conjugates and Measurement of Local Electrostatic Potential. Biopolymers (1998) 46:445–53. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(199812)46:7<445::AID-BIP2>3.0.CO;2-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Boedtkjer E, Pedersen SF. The Acidic Tumor Microenvironment as a Driver of Cancer. Annu Rev Physiol (2020) 82:103–26. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021119-034627

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Petrova V, Annicchiarico-Petruzzelli M, Melino G, Amelio I. The Hypoxic Tumour Microenvironment. Oncogenesis (2018) 7:10. doi: 10.1038/s41389-017-0011-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Sjöback R, Nygren J, Kubista M. Absorption and Fluorescence Properties of Fluorescein. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc (1995) 51:L7–L21. doi: 10.1016/0584-8539(95)01421-P

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Doughty MJ. pH Dependent Spectral Properties of Sodium Fluorescein Ophthalmic Solutions Revisited. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt (2010) 30:167–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00703.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. McLoughlin CK, Kotroni E, Bregnhoj M, Rotas G, Vougioukalakis GC, Ogilby PR. Oxygen- and pH-Dependent Photophysics of Fluorinated Fluorescein Derivatives: Non-Symmetrical vs. Symmetrical Fluorination. Sensors (Basel) (2020) 20(18):5172. doi: 10.3390/s20185172

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Voss EW Jr, Croney JC, Jameson DM. Discrete Bathochromic Shifts Exhibited by Fluorescein Ligand Bound to Rabbit Polyclonal Anti-Fluorescein Fab Fragments. J Protein Chem (2002) 21:231–41. doi: 10.1023/a:1019789118530

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Croce AC, Fiorani S, Locatelli D, Nano R, Ceroni M, Tancioni F, et al. Diagnostic Potential of Autofluorescence for an Assisted Intraoperative Delineation of Glioblastoma Resection Margins. Photochem Photobiol (2003) 77:309–18. doi: 10.1562/0031-8655(2003)077<0309:DPOAFA>2.0.CO;2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Yuan Y, Yan Z, Miao J, Cai R, Zhang M, Wang Y, et al. Autofluorescence of NADH is a New Biomarker for Sorting and Characterizing Cancer Stem Cells in Human Glioma. Stem Cell Res Ther (2019) 10:330. doi: 10.1186/s13287-019-1467-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Mazurek M, Kulesza B, Stoma F, Osuchowski J, Mandziuk S, Rola R. Characteristics of Fluorescent Intraoperative Dyes Helpful in Gross Total Resection of High-Grade Gliomas-a Systematic Review. Diagnostics (Basel) (2020) 10(12):1100. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10121100

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Stummer W, Koch R, Valle RD, Roberts DW, Sanai N, Kalkanis S, et al. Intraoperative Fluorescence Diagnosis in the Brain: A Systematic Review and Suggestions for Future Standards on Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility. Acta Neurochir (Wien) (2019) 161:2083–98. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-04007-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Acerbi F, Pollo B, De Laurentis C, Restelli F, Falco J, Vetrano IG, et al. Ex Vivo Fluorescein-Assisted Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (Convivo(R) System) in Patients With Glioblastoma: Results From a Prospective Study. Front Oncol (2020) 10:606574. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.606574

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Belykh E, Miller EJ, Carotenuto A, Patel AA, Cavallo C, Martirosyan NL, et al. Progress in Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy for Neurosurgery and Technical Nuances for Brain Tumor Imaging With Fluorescein. Front Oncol (2019) 9:554. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00554

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: sodium fluorescein, spectroscopy, brain tumor, confocal, fluorescein-guided surgery, optical probe, pH sensing, NaFl

Citation: Xu R, Teich W, Frenzel F, Hoffmann K, Radke J, Rösler J, Faust K, Blank A, Brandenburg S, Misch M, Vajkoczy P, Onken JS and Resch-Genger U (2021) Optical Characterization of Sodium Fluorescein In Vitro and Ex Vivo. Front. Oncol. 11:654300. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.654300

Received: 15 January 2021; Accepted: 07 April 2021;
Published: 10 May 2021.

Edited by:

Karl-Michael Schebesch, University of Regensburg, Germany

Reviewed by:

Julius Höhne, University Medical Center Regensburg, Germany
Jens Gempt, Technische Universität München, Germany

Copyright © 2021 Xu, Teich, Frenzel, Hoffmann, Radke, Rösler, Faust, Blank, Brandenburg, Misch, Vajkoczy, Onken and Resch-Genger. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ran Xu, ran.xu@charite.de

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

These authors share last authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.