Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Nutr., 05 July 2023
Sec. Nutrition and Food Science Technology
Volume 10 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1168361

A review: The nutrition components, active substances and flavonoid accumulation of Tartary buckwheat sprouts and innovative physical technology for seeds germinating

Yulu Dong1 Nan Wang1 Shunmin Wang1* Junzhen Wang2 Wenping Peng1
  • 1College of Biological and Food Engineering, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu, China
  • 2Academy of Agricultural Science Liang Shan, Liangshan, China

Compared with the common grain, Tartary buckwheat enjoys higher nutritional value. Some distinctive nutrition associated with physiological activity of Tartary buckwheat is valuable in medicine. In addition, it’s a good feed crop. In the paper, the main components (starch, protein, amino acid, fatty acid and mineral) and polyphenol bioactive components in Tartary buckwheat and its sprouts were reviewed, and the accumulation of flavonoids in sprouts during germination, especially the methods, synthetic pathways and mechanisms of flavonoid accumulation was summarized. The research on bioactive components and health benefits of Tartary buckwheat also were reviewed. Besides, the applications of innovative physical technology including microwave, magnetic, electromagnetic, ultrasonic, and light were also mentioned and highlighted, which could promote the enrichment of some active substances during seeds germination and growth of Tartary buckwheat sprouts. It would give a good support and benefit for the research and processing of Tartary buckwheat and its sprouts in next day.

1. Introduction

Grain is one of the world’s most momentous cash crops, with an annual yield approximately 2.5 × 1012 kg (1). Sprouted grains and legumes are considered to be more nutritious and digestible than unsprouted varieties. Some studies even suggest that, compared with non-germinated cereals seed, the proportions of active components, like protein, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), free amino acid, flavonoid, and phenol, are significantly increased in germinated cereals, while the contents of unsaturated fatty acid (UFA), carbohydrate, and mineral of seedlings are reduced. Germinated cereals were closely related to abundant nutritional value and health functions (2). Sprouted grains, which can be fresh-cooking or taken advantage as a high value health ingredient after superfine grinding powder (3), are becoming increasingly popular with consumers in food, medicine, health products, cosmetics and other fields.

Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn. (Tartary buckwheat), belonging to the family Polygonaceae and genus Fagopyrum, is widely consumed around the world (4). Tartary buckwheat is an annual herb dicotyledonous plant with erect, branched, green or purplish, pinstriped stems. Leaves have long stem, leaf blade is broadly triangular, seeds are conical ovate, sharp upper part, rounded lower part, pericarp rough, dark brown, with three deep furrows (5). Tartary buckwheat is one of the minor cereals in Asia, Europe, North America and South Africa. As an important economic grain crop in China, it has been cultivated for more than 2000 years. Tartary buckwheat is a kind of medicinal and edible plant resource with high nutritional and medicinal value. Furthermore, it’s a typical representative of the homologous culture of medicine and food.

Tartary buckwheat is abundant in a variety of nutrients and bioactive substances, such as protein, flavonoid, unsaturated fatty acid, cellulose, mineral and vitamin and others (6, 7). Compared with other grains, Tartary buckwheat possesses variety of nutritional ingredients and more balanced nutrients (8), the details of Table 1 (9, 10) and Table 2 (917) are as follows. Being known as the 21st century nutritional food, it’s generally 76.7% carbohydrate (including 5.8% dietary fiber), 12.2% protein and 4% fat, etc. In the recent centuries, Tartary buckwheat is mainly consumed in the form of flour, bread, vinegar, tea and sprouts in Japan, Italy and China, and whole Tartary buckwheat seeds play great effect (18). Recent studies have shown Tartary buckwheat sprouts is rich in flavonoids and other polyphenols, so which displays some delightful of biological activities, such as anti-oxidation (1921), anti-cancer (22, 23), anti-inflammation (24), lowering blood pressure (25), reducing blood sugar (26), lowering blood fat (25) and improving immunity (6, 27). It is used as a dual-purpose crop and good functional food raw material, so research and development of related products with Tartary buckwheat sprouts has attracted more and more people (28).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Comparison of nutritional components between Tartary buckwheat and common grains.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Comparison of fatty acid and functionally active components of Tartary buckwheat and common grains.

Germination is a popular method among health lovers in recent years. It’s also a common practice for improving the digestibility and nutritional value of seeds, grains, nuts, or legumes (29). Affected by many elements, including seed vigor, temperature and time, as well as some external chemical or physical stimuli such as hormones, visible light, ultraviolet light, ultrasound (US), microwave (MW), and magnetic field (MF), electromagnetic field (EMF) (30), and static electric field (SEF), seed germination is a complex series of physiological and biochemical processes. Controlling germination can effectively enhance food quality in nutritional value and flavor (31). Besides, promoting the germination of grain seeds, non-thermal technologies of US, MW and MF produce a series of specific effects and physiological and biochemical changes. Compared with hormones and exogenous additives and/or heat treatment, non-heat treatment is not only limited to altering the physical and chemical properties of grains, but can also upgrade nutritional and functional ingredients and reduce anti-nutritional factors by inducing associated biochemical transformation (32). Therefore, in recent years, a great deal of new non-thermal physical treatment technologies, containing ultra-high voltage, MW, MF, high-voltage pulse electric field, ionizing radiation and pulse have been gradually applied to the field of germination, and have achieved fruitful research results (33).

This paper provided an overview of the changes of the main components (starch, protein, polyphenol, amino acid, fatty acid and mineral) in Tartary buckwheat and its sprouting seedlings. It focused on the synthesis and enrichment ways of flavonoids, the main active components in Tartary buckwheat, as well as germination processing methods. This paper also reviewed research activities related to the germination of Tartary buckwheat both domestically and abroad. In order to provide reference for full exploitation and utilization of Tartary buckwheat, we collected previous research and summarized this review.

2. The main nutritional components of the Tartary buckwheat sprouting

Nowadays, more and more people pay attention to their health, for it is one of the most important things we should do to get more natural health benefits from food. Being rich in vitamins and nutrients, whole grain foods such as oat, buckwheat, Tartary buckwheat, barley, wild rice and quinoa have been proven that they can reduce the risk of heart disease, type 2 diabetes, obesity and some cancers. Furthermore, they make great effects in improving gut health and other diseases.

The excellent nutritional qualities and remarkable functional activities of Tartary buckwheat have attracted close attention of scholars (Table 3). At present, many studies have shown that the structure, properties, in vitro digestibility and functional activities of Tartary buckwheat, which can be improved by heat, humidity, light and cold, etc. As the same time, the flavonoids ingredients can be enriched by increasing the gene expression of key enzymes, thus opening up a new way for the development of new functions of Tartary buckwheat and its applications in food industry (58).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Physiological function of Tartary buckwheat sprout.

2.1. Tartary buckwheat starch

The content of Tartary buckwheat starch (TBS) is the highest proportion in all of the carbohydrates, and its structure and properties also are complex. Current research on TBS focus on structural modification and bioactivity studies (59). Some researchers revealed the compositions, structure and properties of TBS, which indicated the amylose content of Tartary buckwheat was approximately 20% ~ 28%, and the resistant starch (RS) content was approximately 13.06% ~ 23.07% (5961). While the amylopectin had super-long unit chain (DP > 100), the long chain starch content of amylopectin was 12% ~ 13%, and the crystalline type was A-type polymorphism with the size range of 2 ~ 15 μm. By changing the molecular structure of TBS, it can improve its properties or endow it with new functions (62). At present, there are many reports about the modification of TBS, such as pressure heat method, damp heat method, enzyme method, high pressure treatment and so on. The results showed that the solubility, swelling power, crystal morphology and functional properties of TBS modified by alcohol-alkali method, drying method and ball milling method were improved to some extent (63).

The properties and in vitro digestibility of TBS using heat-moisture treatment (HMT) and annealing (ANN) was revealed, under different treatments, the amylose content, relative crystallinity, water absorption and gelatinization temperature increased (64, 65), but the solubility and swelling power of TBS decreased with temperature (66), the total hydrolysis and RDS (rapidly digestion starch, 20 min after digestion) decreased, while SDS (slow digestion starch, 20 ~ 120 min after digestion) and RS increased (67). Both ANN and HMT can effectively improve the properties and in vitro digestibility of TBS. In addition, the thermal stability, functionality and application value of TBS are increased significantly.

The impacts of ultra-high pressure (HHP) treatment on Tartary buckwheat starch’s properties were displayed in two similar studies. HHP treatment could cause TBS particles to sag and adhere, and could gradually lose its original shape, but its crystalline type was still typical A-type. Other study reported that HHP treatment could induce the surface roughness of TBS particles, the amylose content and gelatinization temperature increased significantly with the increase of pressure (68), while the relative crystallinity, swelling force, hardness and viscosity decreased. However, compared with natural starch, HHP modified TBS hydrolysis degree was lower, RDS content was lower, SDS and RS content were higher. The structure, physical and chemical properties, microbial properties and in vitro digestibility of TBS were changed by HHP treatment (69).

Some studies found that TBS was not easily digested by amylase because of its close association with flavonoid. Therefore, TBS mainly exists in the form of RS, and contains more SDS and less RDS. RS is not digested in the intestine but it is fermented by gut microbes to produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) when RS enters the large intestine (70). Part of SCFA is absorbed by the intestine and enters into the blood circulation system, which is utilized by the body through a series of biochemical reactions, thus exerting certain physiological functions (71). It has also been proved that RS can decrease the postprandial blood glucose, increase the insulin sensitivity and improve the metabolic disorder of glucose and lipid in type 2 diabetic patients (42). It was reported that TBS could decreased the plasma total cholesterol (TC) and total triglycerides (TG) by 22.86 and 63.16%, respectively, when the mice were fed with a high-fat diet (44). Through the above, it is concluded that TBS has advantages in lowering cholesterol, preventing diabetes and cardiovascular diseases and controlling cancer.

The changes of properties of Tartary buckwheat starch during germination were studied. The results implied that the starch loss increased (4.4% ~ 5.9%) moderately and scanning electron microscope showed that the porosity around starch granules improved in the process of germination. Germination process had no obvious influence on the X-ray diffraction pattern, while the crystallinity percentage of starch increased with germination rate increasing. Besides, the process of germination upgraded the solubility of buckwheat starch, but had no obvious effect on swelling power. Therefore, a number of functional properties of Tartary buckwheat starch were improved with the treatment of moderate germination (72). A study showed water absorption and foaming ability of the obtained sprout flour increased, but foaming stability decreased after 48 h of Tartary buckwheat germination. The compound nutrient flour G′ and G″ increased with the prolonged germinated (96 h) Tartary buckwheat flour and the addition of germinated Tartary buckwheat flour into rice flour. The glycemic index of muffins with germinated (24 h ~ 48 h) Tartary buckwheat flour was lower than that of non-germinated Tartary buckwheat flour, but the glycemic index of Tartary buckwheat increased when germinating for 96 h (34).

2.2. Tartary buckwheat protein

Being an important nutrient of Tartary buckwheat, Tartary buckwheat protein (TBP) is rich in multiple amino acids and the proportion of amino acids is balanced (73). The results showed that the contents of low molecular weight protein and high molecular weight protein in TBP were relatively low, and more than three quarters (76.8%) of the proteins were mainly distributed between 10 ~ 60 kDa (74). TBP is mainly composed of glutenin, globulin, albumin and gliadin (61), the proportion of four proteins in total protein of Tartary buckwheat is 33.73, 14.08, 42.65 and 9.54%, respectively (75). It was found that the protein content decreased with the duration of seeds germination time. Accompanied by the protein content reduction, amino acids in Tartary buckwheat seedlings accumulated. It implied that the accumulation of amino acids was the result of protein degradation, thus improving the digestibility of buckwheat protein (45). The previous report confirmed that MW pretreatment at varying power and time had modulating influence on the structure, functional characteristics, and antioxidant capacity of germinated TBP. Compared with native germinated TBP, MW pretreatment promoted the structure expansion of germinated TBP, improved the content of free sulfhydryl groups in germinated TBP, the intensity of the ultraviolet absorption peak (p < 0.05) and random coil contents, and decreased the proportion of α-helix and β-folding in secondary structure. Furthermore, some properties of germinated TBP including solubility (24.37%), water-holding capacity (38.95%), emulsifying activity index (17.21%), emulsifying stability index (11.22%), foaming capacity (71.43%), foaming stability (33.60%), the in vitro protein digestibility (5.56%) and antioxidant capacities were significantly improved (p < 0.05). The functional properties of germinated TBP were optimized by MW treatment of 300 W/50 s (76).

Studies revealed that TBP had low digestibility and physiological functions such as anti-oxidation and cholesterol-lowering (45), and the capability of inhibit hydroxyl radical of TBP was 17.55 u/MG and the capability of scavenging IC50 was 1.372 mg/mL, which indicated that TBP had good in vitro antioxidant capacity (46, 77). The effect of TBP on plasma TC in hypercholesterolemic hamsters was surveyed, the result showed TBP could increase the excretion of total bile acid by 2.63 times and decrease the plasma TC by 45%, which indicated that TBP was an active component to decrease the total cholesterol activity of plasma (48). TBP could increase the activities of total Superoxide dismutase (SOD) (about 5.8% ~ 23.64%) and Glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) (about 15.3% ~ 65.04%) and decrease the level of liver malondialdehyde (MDA) (about 38.78% ~ 1.22%). Besides, it could lower blood sugar and protect the liver with histopathology studies. The outcomes have shown TBP enjoys a large of protective effects on hyperglycemia and liver injury in mice fed a high-fructose diet (78). Besides, it was reported that TBP could decreased TC and TG by 1.788, 52.05%, respectively, while inhibit the growth of E.coli in the gut of mice and promote the proliferation of Lactobacillus when the mice were fed with a high-fat diet (44).

2.3. Tartary buckwheat amino acids

Tartary buckwheat is abundant in high-quality protein, which contains 19 types of amino acids in proper proportions. So it has important research prospects in health functions, such as anti-aging and improving metabolism (54). Results revealed that all essential amino acids (EAAs) essential were present in Tartary buckwheat flours. In all buckwheat varieties, the contents of AAs differed significantly (p < 0.005). Among these EAAs, buckwheat varieties were characterized by high contents of leucine, followed by phenylalanine, lysine, and threonine (ranged from 743.66 to 1278.87, 398.48 to 877.96, 300.06 to 736.93 and 298.76 to 879.80 mg/100 g, respectively) (79). Germination can promote the variety of amino acids in Tartary buckwheat seedlings to become more diverse and rich in contents. The total amino acids contents of Tartary buckwheat decreased by 13.7% (notable Met+Cys and Phe + Try) after 72 h of germination (80), which were closely related to the transformation of nutrients in the early stage of seed germination. Tyrosine and L-Phenylalanine were involved in the early reaction of phenylpropane metabolism in plants (81), and their changes were closely related to the accumulation of plant secondary metabolites. During plant growth, proline metabolism was closely related to the production of reactive oxygen species (Ros). Ros is considered to be an important messenger in response to stress. Therefore, the increase of proline contents is generally considered to be an anti-stress response of plants in response to stress (82).

The study found, when after 48–72 h of germination of Tartary buckwheat, the content of EAAs of lysine, leucine and phenylalanine and GABA in sprout flour increased 2.3% ~ 24.77, 14.18% ~ 19.19, 10.66% ~ 21.45 and 27.48% ~ 40.89%, respectively (34). The effect of MW regulation on the variety and quantity of amino acid synthesis during the growth of buckwheat seeds was investigated. The results showed that under 300 W/50 s MW treatment, with the extension of the germination time of Tartary buckwheat seeds, the germination decreased first and then increased. Compared with sprouts without MW pretreatment, the cystine content of 5-day sprouts increased the most (158.62%), followed by tyrosine (38.71%), alanine (29.62%), proline (27.27%), valine (25.68%), histidine (24.32%), lysine (24.18%), threonine (24.14%), and phenylalanine (23.73%). EAAs and total amino acids (TAAs) content increased by 25.92 and 24.65%, respectively. In addition, compared with the other MW treatment groups, the benefits of EAAs and TAAs were the most significant at 300 W/50 s, and the EAAs/TAAs value was the highest under this condition (35.04%) (83).

2.4. Tartary buckwheat phenols

Tartary buckwheat is rich in flavonoids, phenolic acids, quinones and other polyphenols. Flavonoid is one of the most abundant and important bioactive substances in Tartary buckwheat, mainly including rutin, quercetin and procyanidin (84). Tartary buckwheat flavonoids (such as rutin, myricetin and quercetin) have various biological activities and pharmacological effects, it is not only beneficial to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular health, but also has anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antioxidant and antiviral properties (22, 23). Tartary buckwheat has great research value and future application in the food and pharmaceutical industries for its high contents in flavonoid. Rutin is a unique and abundant flavonoid in Tartary buckwheat. And it was found that the rutin content of Tartary buckwheat seeds was 30–150 times higher than that of common buckwheat seeds (85). Anthocyanin, a special kind of flavonoids with high antioxidant capacity, can accumulate in Tartary buckwheat and provide red pigment in Tartary buckwheat sprouts. In addition, it offers important nutrients and resists abiotic stresses to help Tartary buckwheat adapt to adverse environments (86).

It has confirmed that Tartary buckwheat flavonoid has the antioxidant and antidiabetic properties, in which rutin and quercetin are important active substances (87). Tartary buckwheat flavonoids had different scavenging abilities on various types of free radicals, and all three flavonoids (rutin, quercetin, isoquercetin) had strong activities of radical scavenging for DPPH (2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl), but which had weak scavenging ability to hydroxyl and superoxide anion radicals. Quercetin had the highest biological activity. Its scavenging activity of DPPH and superoxide anion radical was about 148 and 183% of vitamin C, respectively, (50). The same results of ABTS (2,2′-Azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt), DPPH and FRAP (ferric reducing antioxidant potential) in vitro also showed that Tartary buckwheat flavonoid had strong antioxidant capacity. Further studies have shown that increasing the consumption of glucose and the accumulation of glycogen content significantly in HepG2 cells, Tartary buckwheat flavonoid has distinct anti-diabetic influence (87). Hou et al. (52) investigated the effects of Tartary buckwheat flavonoid on vascular insulin sensitivity in spontaneously hypertensive rats, and the results showed TBF (Tartary buckwheat flavonoids fraction) could protect hypertension by attenuating vascular insulin resistance and oxidative stress. It indicated the chronic TBF diet may ameliorate insulin-induced vasodilatation and insulin signaling pathways in the mesenteric arterioles of spontaneously hypertensive rats, illustrating that TBF could be used for the treatment of hypertension.

Some research reported (88) Tartary buckwheat flavonoid could increase the activity of GSH-Px and SOD in mice livers, decrease the level of non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) and MDA in mice livers and the activity of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in serum. Therefore, it can prevent vascular dysfunction and liver injury caused by high trimethylamine-N-oxide. The experiments confirmed that Tartary buckwheat flavonoid could prevent inflammation caused by obesity (49). Other study showed the flavonoid had effects on antioxidant capacity, inhibition of a-glycosidase and a-amylase, and starch digestibility (53). Besides, it was reported that the feed of Tartary buckwheat flavonoid could decreased content of TC and TG by 0.60 and 0.91 mmol/l, respectively, when the mice were fed with a high-fat diet (44). Hence, it has a good role in some filed for scavenging free radicals, anti-oxidation and anti-aging.

The dehulled seeds underwent germination, the total phenolic content (TPC) and antioxidant capacity of DPPH in sprout was 29.5 mg GAE/g dry weight (DW) and 29.87 TE/g DW, respectively, which was increased by 42.23 and 32.58% compared to hulled seeds. In addition to orientin and vitexin, high levels of other phenolic compounds (such as isoorientin and rutin by 1,402 and 967 μg/g DW, respectively) were detected in peeled germinated seeds. The data showed that buckwheat seeds, which were peeled and germinated, as a dietary source of phenolic compounds, had great application potential in functional foods and were beneficial to health (2).

During germination of Tartary buckwheat, the seeds leapt from a hypopus state to a dynamic state of frequent metabolic activity, during which respiration increased, the variety, quantity and activity of enzymes also increased significantly. It kept the physiological metabolism of seeds at a high level and accelerated the biological transformation based on enzymatic reaction (89). Germination effectively increases the digestibility and bioavailability of protein and starch, inhibits contents of toxic, harmful or anti-nutrient elements (90), and raises contents of some bioactive substances such as GABA (up to 143.20 mg/100 g) and rutin (up to 739.9 mg/100 g) (91), free amino acids, phenolics and flavonoid (45). Particularly, the germination has more notably effects on rutin contents and makes it reached to a peak value (12055.78 μg/g DW) (92), which can significantly improve the nutritional value and biological activity of Tartary buckwheat. Therefore, the germination treatment of Tartary buckwheat is of great significance, and the application of effective techniques to promote the germination of Tartary buckwheat is particularly important.

A lot of studies have shown that the content and activity of flavonoid in the germinated buckwheat can increase with different treatments. Tartary buckwheat can effectively promote the accumulation of flavonoid by light treatment. A report confirmed that all three treatments of UV-A (365 nm) UV-C (254 nm) after exposure to blue light and their combination treatments had influenced on flavonoid contents (rutin, quercetin) and total flavonoids in Tartary buckwheat, the rutin content under the combined irradiation of blue light and UV-C (BL + UV-C) was 13.5% higher than that of (UV-C + BL) (93). Sprouts irradiated 12 h with UV-C, UV-A and blue light after cultivated in darkness for 60 h, the total flavonoids content in sprouts reached approximately to 47, 46, 28 mg/g DW, respectively, which was 56.1, 51.2, 24.2% higher than that in darkness, respectively. Some physical methods of processing of US, MF and MW can also improve the concentration of flavonoids. The previous study demonstrated that ultrasound power, treatment time and other conditions could significantly affect the content of flavonoids, at the 6th day after incubation, the total flavonoids content in the seedlings treated with US for 30 min was up to 9.16 g/100 g, which increased by 0.64 times (94). Another study showed that the total flavonoids content in Tartary buckwheat sprouts was 9.46 g/100 g, increasing by 69.71% under the treatment of ultrasonic power 280 W, temperature 30°C and time 30 min (95). All of the MF and MW irradiation had significant alterations on the flavonoids content, the MF stimulation could induce the increase of total flavonoids content. The total flavonoids content reached the maximum value of 62.90 mg/g and increased by 43.21% when germinated for 5 days under 0.3 T magnetic field intensity (96). Similar to above study report, it was proved that 600 W MW irradiation could significantly increase the total flavonoids content in Tartary buckwheat sprouts (97). Bhinder et al. (34) confirmed that the antioxidant capacity of flour increased after 72 h of germination as a result of the accumulation of free flavonoids and phenolic acids. Although free rutin was the main polyphenol and reached to 88.1 mg/kg, the increment after germination was higher in kaempferol (2.42 mg/kg), catechin (39.59 mg/kg), vitexin (6.68 mg/kg) and p-coumaric acid (7.67 mg/kg).

2.5. Tartary buckwheat fatty acids

Tartary buckwheat is rich in multiple essential fatty acids like linoleic acid and α-linolenic acid. Fatty acids participate in the normal operation and metabolism of cholesterol in human body, inhibit the formation of arterial thrombosis, regulate human body functions and have other many functions such as prevention of cardiovascular disease, antibacterial and anti-inflammatory (5557). The study showed that linoleic acid (C18:2) was the main fatty acid of buckwheat sprouts, the percentage of linoleic acid content boosted from 38.1 to 52.1% and total unsaturated fatty acids composition was more than 83% after 7 days of germination (28). Tartary buckwheat bran and flour were examined and quantified using GC–MS. The results indicated that a total of 8 fatty acids including myristic acid (C14:0), palmitic acid (C16:0), stearic acid (C18:0), oleic acid (C18:1), linoleic acid (C18:2n-6c), linolenic acid (C18:3n-3), arachidic acid (C20:0), and cis-11-eicosenoic acid (C20:1) were identified, in which C18:2n-6c, C18:1, and C16:0 were primary fatty acids of Tartary buckwheat (98). However, previously studied data showed the content of fatty acids in buckwheat seeds changed with germination days. For instance, the content of palmitic acid, stearic acid, eicosenoic acid and arachidonic acid increased gradually, while the linoleic acid content decreased (45). In terms of their functions, the changes of fatty acids during germination were also bidirectional. Twenty-five fatty acids were detected in sprouts of Tartary buckwheat, among which the amounts of palmitic acid, oleic acid, and linoleic acid were higher. During germination, sugar metabolism and fatty acid synthesis of Tartary buckwheat seeds would increase. Starch and other polysaccharides in the seeds were hydrolyzed to monosaccharides, which would be converted into energy and other biomolecules, including fatty acids. Therefore, increased sugar metabolism during germination could provide necessary carbon sources and energy for fatty acid synthesis. So, the content of total fatty acids (TFA) improved gradually with increasing germination time, while the content of stearic acid and oleic acid declined. The content of unsaturated fatty acids decreased first and then increased, and the value of UFA/TFA decreased. In general, the contents of TFA, UFA and some polyunsaturated fatty acids in edible Tartary buckwheat sprouts could be upgraded by germination, but the UFA/TFA value was reduced (83).

2.6. Tartary buckwheat minerals

Tartary buckwheat is rich in a variety of minerals beneficial to human health, especially potassium, sodium, copper, zinc, calcium and iron, which are much higher than other crops. Huang et al. found that the contents of Cu, Zn, Fe, K, and Mg elements were great fluctuation, those ranges were 5.74 ~ 36.01, 8.44 ~ 66.63, 21.8 ~ 3,990, 1737 ~ 5,831, and 729 ~ 3,104 mg/kg in the Tartary buckwheat seeds (water content about 13%) (8). The contents of Cu, Mn, Fe, Zn, K, Mg, and Ca in Tartary buckwheat flours varied from 0.64 to 2.81, 0.08 to 2.72, 1.75 to 17.21, 1.23 to 5.79, 280.6 to 648.7, 66.90 to 362.90, and 30.0 to 331 mg/100 g, respectively. K, Mg, and Ca were abundant in Tartary buckwheat varieties, of which had the highest content in B-121 (648.7 ± 11.54 mg/kg), IC-329200 (361.30 ± 2.02 mg/kg), and IC-274439 (331.0 ± 4.28 mg/kg), respectively. Due to the variety of Tartary buckwheat, the contents of mineral elements are very different (79).

During germination, the contents of various minerals in Tartary buckwheat will change in different degrees. In the process of plant growth, mineral elements play a significant role in the regulation of cellular permeability and osmotic balance, acting as enzyme cofactors (99) and forming transmembrane potentials (100). Furthermore, they produce significant effects on cell division and elongation, related enzyme activity, protein synthesis and respiration.

2.7. Tartary buckwheat germination as a tool to improve biological activity

Being a major source of rutin, buckwheat has a great deal of pharmacological functions, such as antioxidant and hypoglycemic effects (101). Germination can activate a variety of enzymes in plants, and many physiological and biochemical reactions occur during seed germination, resulting in a significant increase in the contents of functional active components such as flavonoid and phenol in the body, thereby enhancing the bud or seedling health effects.

2.7.1. Antioxidant effect

Sim et al. indicated that sucrose and CaCl2 induction not only significantly enhanced the antioxidant capacity of buckwheat malt on HepG2 cells, but also protected fibroblasts from oxidative damage. CaCl2 could effectively maintain the accumulation of bioactive compounds in buckwheat sprouts, thus enhancing the sucrose-induced antioxidant capacity (102). The improvement of oxidative damage in HePG2 cells by buckwheat sprouts was mainly achieved by regulating the production of reactive oxygen species and malondialdehyde, and antioxidant enzyme activity (36).

Physical or chemical treatments can affect Tartary buckwheat seeds or seedlings to varying degrees. Besides, the ability and potential of germination and the activity of enzymes such as SOD and Peroxidase (POD) are improved to resist adversity, accelerate metabolism and photosynthesis, and promote the production of secondary metabolites (36, 97).

2.7.2. Anti-inflammatory effect

When Tartary buckwheat was treated with laser light (He–Ne laser, 632 nm, 5 mW), the results indicated that laser enhanced the antioxidant capacity and anti-inflammatory activities by restraining the activities of cyclooxygenase-2 and lipoxygenase, particularly in sprouts (38). Another study suggested that according to the assessment of the production of proinflammatory mediators such as nitric oxide and cytokines including tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin- (IL-) 6, and IL-12 in lipopolysaccharide- (LPS-) RAW 264.7 macrophages, the extracts of Tartary buckwheat sprout displayed higher inhibitory activity than that of common buckwheat sprout. Moreover, the production of LPS-induced cytokine in peritoneal macrophages decreased significantly under the effect of Tartary buckwheat sprout extracts (24). The above findings suggested that Tartary buckwheat sprout could be a potential source of anti-inflammatory agents. The experiments outcome confirmed that adipogenesis and inflammatory reaction during 3 T3-L1 cell differentiation could be inhibited by reducing glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPDH) activity and nitric oxide (NO: a plant signal) production, as well as by regulating the expression of genes related to fatty acid synthesis and inflammatory mediators. Consequently, Tartary buckwheat flavonoid can be applied to prevent inflammation caused by obesity (49).

2.7.3. Hypoglycemic effect

The effects of purified total flavone extracted of Tartary buckwheat on insulin resistance and hepatic oxidative stress in mice was investigated. Tartary buckwheat could effectively prevent insulin resistance and oxidative stress induced by high fructose diet through some ways including lowering blood glucose and insulin concentration, improving insulin signaling molecules, restoring the altered antioxidant defense, and activating Nrf2 signaling pathway (103). D-chiralinositol (DCI) is a compound with insulin-like biological activity, whose free form can reduce the blood glucose and has hypoglycemic effect. Acting as a messenger during insulin signaling, directly promoting the combination of insulin and its receptor, thereby promoting insulin action and ultimately lowering blood glucose, DCI is a natural α-glucosidase inhibitor for diabetics (35). It has been reported that buckwheat DCI mainly exists in buckwheat phenol form, which can be converted into free DCI during germination (39). The research showed that the concentration of 0.05% NaHCO3 increased the DCI content in the sprouts of Tartary buckwheat by up to 9-fold (40), and metal ions (Al3+, Cu2+, Zn2+) also could increase α-glycosidase activity to release more free DCI, so as to increase the effect of reducing sugar in buckwheat (41).

3. Several new physical methods on germination of Tartary buckwheat seeds

The valid way to improve food nutritional value and flavor is to control germination (31). However, influenced by many intrinsic elements, seed germination is featured by a range of complicated physiological and biochemical processes (104). These factors consist of seed vigor, temperature, time, and some external stimuli like hormones, visible light, UV, US, MW, MF (30), ultra-high voltage, high voltage pulsed electric fields, ionizing radiation and pulsed MF. The new processing technologies are considered to be non-thermal processing. In contrast to thermal treatments, non-thermal techniques are not limited to altering the physical and chemical properties of grains, since through the induction of associated biochemical conversion, it is also possible to improve the nutrient and functional composition and reduce anti-nutrient factors (32).

US, MW, MF and other non-thermal technologies can stimulate cereal seeds germination and produce some specific effects, resulting in a series of physiological and biochemical changes, as well as attracting more and more researchers’ attention (Table 4).

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Facilitation effects of physical methods on seeds or sprouts.

3.1. Effect of light on germination of Tartary buckwheat seeds

As a prominent environmental factor, illumination effects in the accumulation of plant secondary metabolites. Light intensity and duration to a certain extent also have momentous impacts on plant growth (105). Compare with darkness, the germination, growth and flavonoid accumulation of Tartary buckwheat is more conducive in light ((105107)). According to Lee’s experiment, the third day seedlings under dark conditions were treated with light-emitting diode (LED) lamps [red, blue and red + blue], results showed the rutin contents of Tartary buckwheat sprouts were documented 82% (ca. 29 mg/g DW) of the total phenolic compounds and which were around 6-fold higher than those of common buckwheat sprouts in both at 9 and 12 days after sowing (105). The common buckwheat was grown under different sources of light, it was found that the contents of the individual flavonoids in blue light-exposed were approximately 1.6 ~ 2.9-fold higher than that in the control group, meanwhile, the highest flavonoid content in blue light -exposed was observed for rutin (5.5 mg/g DW) (58). Besides, the treatment with appropriate intensity of single light (UV, blue, white, green, yellow and red)and combined light (blue and UV) significantly enhanced the activities of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) and chalcone isomerase (CHI) in Tartary buckwheat seedlings (58, 107), as well as increased the accumulation of total flavonoids and rutin (105107), and the activities of key enzymes involved in flavonoid synthesis were positively correlated with the accumulation of flavonoids and their antioxidant capacities (58). Being a plant artificial light source with innovation properties, LED has a broad application prospect in some aspects, such as improving the nutritional quality of plant sprouts and micro-green seedlings. Furthermore, it can light both as a supplemental source and a sole source. Some studies have initially determined that a whole string of structural genes involved in the biosynthesis of plant compounds (such as flavonoids and carotenoids) in buds and micro-green are regulated by LED light sources (110). Research has confirmed the biosynthesis of anthocyanins and procyanidins in Tartary buckwheat is affected by ultraviolet radiation (108, 109). A studied results showed that the distribution and content of flavonoids in cotyledons and hypocotyls were affected by different light sources, after the treatment of LED white light and LED blue light, the total flavonoids in Tartary buckwheat cotyledons at 3 days old sprouts were 2.12 and 2.73 times of those in the dark light group (p < 0.01) and the combination of UV-B, LED blue and red light was more appropriate to the regulation of flavonoids accumulation during the germination of Tartary buckwheat (111).

3.2. Effect of electromagnetic field on germination of Tartary buckwheat seeds

Treatment of plant seeds with EMF, SEF and MF can increase related enzymes activity and respiration rate at germination stage, reduce germination time, and promote root growth (112), upraised germination potential and germination rate of most crops. For example, seedling emergence rate produced significant increases of 69.2% with a dosage of 560 mT (112). The seed (Pot Marigold) with the treatment of MF from 5 to 15 min, the variety of the germination was of 86.33 to 20% (116). Electric and magnetic fields radiate plant seeds, which produce large amounts of heat after absorbing energy, causing a rapid rise in intracellular temperature and molecular structural changes such as partial bond breakage (113). This results in changes in cell structure and physiological and biochemical characteristics, increasing concentrations of free radicals in biofilms and permeability of seed coats. After the treatment with MF of 500 mT for 5 min, the germination energy and germination rate of wheat seeds were 93.6 and 95.8%, respectively, which increased by 10 and 7.4% compared with the control. Under the treatment of 200 mT for 30 min, the germination index and vigor index were 23.6 and 62.7, respectively, which increased by 58 and 35% compared with the control (114). Consequently, water and oxygen transport is speeded up (113, 114), improving seed germination potential and rate, promoting seedling growth and seedling quality, and improving metabolic function of crops, induction of plant resistance to increase the total yield of crops. Zhou et al. obtained that the effects of electric and magnetic fields on plant seeds vary with their properties and strengths, the biggest specific activity of PAL was attained at 0.3 T, whereas the specific activity of CHI reached the highest level at 0.2 T. Compared with the control, when the magnetic field intensity was 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 T, the maximum increase of PAL enzyme activity was 2.4, 18.5 and 4.9%, respectively. However, the specific activity of CHI enzyme increased by 12.9 percent (0.2 T), 7.5 percent (0.3 T), and 7.4 percent (0.4 T), respectively (96). Accordingly, compared with the constant magnetic fields, EMF of the same intensity and time has more influence on seed germination (115). Wheat (115), soybean, corn (127) and buckwheat (96), are treated with high voltage electrostatic or MF, both of them can significantly improve seed germination vigor. The vary of MF intensities on the relationship between the specific activities of PAL, CHI and rutin-degrading enzymes and the total flavonoids accumulation was different during the germination of Tartary buckwheat seeds. The results exhibited that the synergistic effect of three enzymes was the best in 5-day-old seedling, and the total flavonoid accumulation was the most significant (62.90 mg/g) (96). So MF stimulation can induce the accumulation of flavonoid components in buckwheat seedlings.

3.3. Effect of MW on germination of Tartary buckwheat seeds

Being a kind of electromagnetic wave, MW is a rapid, convenient, economic and environmental non-thermal processing technology. Deng et al. found that MW (850 W) treatment processes decreased the starch, protein, fat, and ash contents. MW reduced the total flavonoids and essential amino acids and total amino by 19, 3.1 and 4.8%, respectively. Phytic acid and Trypsin inhibitor activity was lowered by 33.4 and 13%. The content of tannin and saponin lost 27.5 and 20.1%, respectively. But the protein digestibility and the ω-6/ω-3 ratio increased by 3.6 and by 4.9, respectively (128). Above outcome implied that low temperature MW treatment can alter biological macromolecular structure of plant seeds, and affect the physiological and biochemical characteristics of seed or seedling.

Under MW treatment, polar substances such as water, fat, carbohydrate and protein in plant cells can absorb electromagnetic energy, which may cause the change of the bond between molecules. Changes in molecular structure may result in changes in physical and chemical properties and morphological characteristics of plants (129). Therefore, MW treatment has the potential to improve the seed germination of various plants,. However, the exposure of MW for high intensity and duration time can inhibit seeds germination. The results showed that germination rate (600 W for 10 s, sowed 7 d) was 2 times that of the control, the germination rate for exposure of seeds to 800 W for 30 s was the lowest (ca.10%), a significant 87% reduction compared to the control group (97). Meanwhile, under condition of 600 W MW for 30 s, the content of the total flavonoids and free amino acid accelerated to 57 mg/g and 11 mg/g, respectively. The DPPH scavenging activity increased significantly, conversely, sugar and soluble protein levels were reduced (97). The results indicated that the germination rate of Tartary buckwheat seeds could be enhanced by suitable MW power treatment over a period of time, which probably resulted from the activation of activities of SOD and catalase (CAT) enzymes needed for growth and development by MW irradiation. At present, about the MW of Tartary buckwheat seeds grow less research on the effects of enzyme activity in the process (97). The reason of increasing the content of total flavonoids by MW treatment may be that it stimulates the activities of enzymes associated with phenylpropane metabolism, such as PAL, CHI and others. As previously mentioned, MW is also a kind of electromagnetic field (96).

In addition, it has been reported that the effect of MW treatment on seed germination is closely related to cracks on seed coat (130). The non-thermal effects of MW radiation are essentially biological. When interacting with the biological tissues, MW radiation will change the charge density on the cell membrane surface and the electric potential difference on both sides of the membrane, thus affecting the activity of ion channels, and ultimately promoting a range of plants physiological changes (131). Owing to plant seeds absorb MW energy, cells internal temperature rises swiftly, the pressure inside the cell surpasses the expansion capacity of cell wall, thus leading to cell rupture and free outflow of cell-active components. It represents an increased ability of soluble substances in cells to pierce through thin biofilm. Previous research has indicated that the alterations of Biomacromolecular structure and physiological and biochemical characteristics of plant cells are the result of the absorption of electromagnetic energy by polar molecules in plant cells (116). Exposed to MW doses between 840 and 1,260 W/g FW (fresh weight), the germination percentage of seeds was increased to 45%, the electrical conductivity of seed leachate was also increased by 28%, indicating seed coat membrane loosening. Observed seed coat by microscopic scanning, it was outcome that the treated seeds had disintegrated and facilitated water absorption. It also found that the least mobile water hydrated with macromolecules (bound water) appeared earlier in microwave-treated seeds than untreated seeds. When the seeds began to germinate, this enhanced hydration may trigger various metabolic activities (132). This kind of growth boost is probably due to irradiation breaking down sugars in the grains, providing nutrient substances for embryonic development, the study given that the content of protein and free amino acid content of 7-d-old wheat seedlings increased 38% (to 47 g/kg) and 6.13 times (to 14.05 g/kg) in the 75 min dose (117). Hence, proper MW processing can boost seed germination.

Studies on the effects of MW treatment on enzyme activity in cereal crops have shown that appropriate MW treatment can stimulate enzyme activity and promote seed germination and active substance accumulation in cereal crops (118). The study also showed that MW radiation treatment under appropriate conditions increased activity of antioxidant enzymes including SOD, POD, CAT, ascorbic peroxidase (APX) and GSH-Px (119). Similarly, MW pretreatment is effective in enhancing alpha-amylase activity (121). Although low-power MW processing facilitated the activities of nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase in oat seed leaves, it also suppressed the activities of proteolytic enzymes and ribonuclease (120). Compared to the control, α-amylase activity in seedlings 24 h after MW pretreatment (10 s) has risen by 33.85% (up to 0.88 mg/g/min) (121). MW can effectively activate several enzymes associated with the metabolism in the process of germination. The suitable MW treatment can heighten the ability of wheat seedlings (variety Zhengzhou 9,023) to scavenge salt-stress-induced free radicals, thus improving the resistance of wheat seedlings to salt stress (121). The protection of MW processing is based on at least three mechanisms. First of all, it upgrades the activities of SOD, POD and CAT, which are regarded to be key enzymes in inhibiting the function of abiotic stress pathway. In the Second place, the concentrations of glutathione and ascorbic acid are improved, thereby eliminating free radicals and reducing oxidative stress. At length, it raises the concentration of NO, which reacts with free radicals such as O- 2 and H2O2.

The effects of MW treatment on the insecticidal efficacy and growth rate of wheat seeds were studied. The results showed that after exposure at 800 W MW for 20–25 s, the wheat seed germination rate significantly decreased by 25% and the seed vigor was inhibited. Thus, the authors hypothesize that the higher intensity MW (800 W) has deleterious effects to seeds (122).

Due to internal heating, MW treatment usually displays little potential in grain sterilization for sample damage caused by heating (133). Furthermore, having some shortcomings such as poor uniformity and heavy energy consumption, MW heating is not favorable to production on a large scale. However, the effects of low-power MW on physiological and biochemical indexes still need to be further studied. And studies have pointed out that MW radiation can dedicate to agriculture, industry and stock farming (120, 134).

The process of germination was accelerated at 300 W MW irradiation for 50 s. After germination, reducing sugar content increased by 7.51 times, starch content decreased by 69.61%, and amylase activity improved obviously. MW irradiation can enhance the activities of PAL, CHI and flavonol synthetase (FLS), and the total flavonoid content achieved the maximum value (5.15 g/100 g DW) after 300 W/50 s irradiation. Therefore, It is valid to improve the functional properties of edible Tartary buckwheat sprouts (83). Compared with CK, the specific activities of PAL, CHI and FLS in 5-day-old sprouts increased by 47.84, 53.04 and 28.02%, respectively, under the optimal treatment condition (MW 250 W, 90 s, 2.9 mmol/L L-Phe) (135).

3.4. Effect of ultrasound on germination of Tartary buckwheat seeds

As a kind of attractive and highly efficient non-thermal treatment technology, US can adjust the growth, physiological metabolism and kill pathogens of sprouts (123). In the applications of biotechnology, US is widely reported as an effective instrument for regulating and getting command of biological processes, including fermentation, enzymatic transformation (136), seed germination, and plant growth (124). But there is limited data on the physical and nutritional properties of Tartary buckwheat sprouts from US-treated seeds. In one study, soybean seeds were treated with US of varying powers (0 W to 300 W) and germinated in the dark for 5 d. The results indicated that US treatment increased germination rate (18.07%), sprout length (24.42%), GABA content (43.39%), daidzein (ca.79.62%) and genistein (ca.70.95%) contents of soybean sprouts (125). Upregulated three key genes namely the arahy. Tifrunner. gnm1.ann1.DXZI51, arahy.Tifrunner.gnm1.ann1.VGN2GE, and arahy.Tifrunner. gnm1.ann1.Y23DM6 showed that resveratrol content could be increased by phenylpropanoid biosynthesis (137).

The “cavity effect” feature of US, MWs, and magnetization related to MF all influence plants growth and metabolism (138). Such physical treatments usually upgrade seed vitality and stimulate plant development simply by altering seed physiological process (138).

The proper and effective seed treatment is of great significance in enhancing germination rate and germination energy (GE), stimulating crop growth, as well as declining crop maturation period. Besides, the non-thermal treatment of MW, like EMF and MF, can improve seed GE and germination rate, enhance the quality and stress resistance of seedlings, and thus raise the yield and metabolic function of crops (139, 140).

Currently, although US, MW, and MF treatments are broadly used as complementary extraction and drying methods, few studies investigate their applications in grain germination (131). In addition, the US oscillations give rise to the rupture of seed coat, which boosts the hydration of dormant seeds. This treatment not only improves the water absorption of seeds but also effectively changes the structure of enzyme molecules by taking advantages of the cavitations and mass transport of enzymes, thus promoting the catalytic action of enzymes (aggrandized 5.74%) and accelerating seed germination (126). What’s more, this hydration has no adverse impact on seeds (126).

Current work indicates that US treatment can improve the edibility and nutritional quality of grain sprouts as an emerging way. These results for regulating the biosynthesis pathway of phenylpropanoid provide a certain reference, which can be used to regulate the nutritional and functional components of sprouted for human health benefits.

3.5. Effect of lasers on germination of Tartary buckwheat seeds

There are few studies on improving the nutritional value of buckwheat sprouts by laser. Almuhayawi et al. (38) treated common buckwheat and Tartary buckwheat with laser (He–Ne laser, 632 nm, 5 mW). Results showed that more that 35 of the 49 targeted minerals, vitamins, pigments and antioxidants were remarkably increased in common buckwheat and/or Tartary buckwheat sprouts. The laser light-treated common buckwheat and Tartary buckwheat sprouts, the total phenols content of sprouts magnified by 1.09 times (up to 12.19 mg/100 g FW) and 56.99% (up to 10.14 mg/100 g FW), respectively, meanwhile, the total flavonoids content of sprouts was augment by 1.78 times (up to 3.72 mg/100 g FW) and 183% (up to 5.46 mg/100 g FW), respectively. Besides, laser light improved the antioxidant capacity and anti-inflammatory activities by inhibiting cyclooxygenase-2 and lipoxygenase activities, especially in Tartary buckwheat sprouts. Hence, laser light has a great prospect in improving the nutritional and health-promoting values of buckwheat sprouts.

4. The mechanism of germination and enrichment of active components

4.1. The synthetic metabolic pathway of flavonoids

The synthesis and accumulation of flavonoid in plants depends on the activity of key enzymes in the flavonoid pathway, the phenylpropanoid pathway, as shown in Figure 1. Phenylpropanoid metabolism is an important pathway for the accumulation of secondary metabolites of flavonoids (81, 142), which is done under the catalysis of a series of enzymes (141). As three important enzymes in this pathway, the activities of PAL, CHI, and FLS act a significant role in the formation of secondary metabolites of flavonoids. Being the first enzyme involved in the flavonoid pathway, PAL is considered as the key rate-limiting enzyme in flavonoid biosynthesis. CHI controls the conversion efficiency of flavonoid precursors into flavanones, flavonoids, flavonols, anthocyanins, etc., their expression efficiency in plants directly affects the yield of total flavonoids. The highest content of flavonoids in plants is flavonol. FLS is a direct regulatory enzyme for flavonol synthesis, determining the content of total flavonoids in plants.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Phenylpropane metabolic pathway (141). PAL, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; C4H, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase; 4CL, sweet bean acid coenzyme A ligase; CHS, chalcone synthase; CHI, chalcone isomerase; F3H, flavanone 3-hydroxylase; F3’H, flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase; DFR, dihydroflavonol reductase; FLS, flavonol synthase.

Chalcone is formed by the initial substrates 4-coumaryl-CoA and malonyl-CoA under the action of Chalcone Synthetase (CHS), and then CHI catalyzes chalcone to produce 4,5,7-trihydroxyflavanone, as a major product of metabolism, it re-enters other different metabolic pathways and forms different flavonoids (143). PAL and CHI are key enzymes in the biosynthesis of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase flavonoid, and their activity is tightly associated with flavonoids content in plants (144). PAL is a key enzyme and rate-limiting enzyme, connecting primary metabolism with phenylpropanoid metabolism, and catalyzing the first step of phenylpropanoid metabolism (145), its activity directly affects the cinnamic acid reserve and is closely related to the subsequent metabolism of flavonoids. Besides, it is the most studied enzyme in phenylpropanoid metabolic pathway (146). CHI is also a key enzyme and rate-limiting enzyme in phenylpropane metabolism that catalyzes the conversion of chalcone to highly bioactive flavonoids (145), and plays an important role in flavonoid metabolism (81). In flavonoid biosynthesis, being a key enzyme in flavonol bypass, FLS acts on the branching point of flavonoid and catalyzes the synthesis of flavonols, such as quercetin, using dihydroflavonols as substrates (147).

It has been shown that PAL and CHI are induced during seed germination by various external factors, such as light, mechanical damage, US, MW, and MF, etc. (148). In recent years, some new physical methods, such as ultrasound, laser, electric field, magnetic field and MW, are becoming more and more received for their advantages, including easy operation, short duration, low cost and environmental protection. In addition, having good biological effects, these methods show great advantages in improving the germination rate and growth vigor of Tartary buckwheat, enhancing the activity of enzymes related to growth metabolism and enriching bioactive substances. So, researchers at home and abroad have developed great enthusiasm for these emerging approaches (96, 97, 149). The application of these new methods has far-reaching significance to enrich bioactive components and increase yield of Tartary buckwheat during germination.

Light conditions have different effects on the activities of key enzymes for flavonoid enrichment. There are reports showed that UV-A (365 nm) UV-C (254 nm) and their combination treatments significantly increased the activities of key enzymes such as Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, chalcone isomerase (CHI) and rutin degrading enzyme (RDEs) in Tartary buckwheat, and improved the content of total flavonoids (93, 94).

The appropriate intensity of electromagnetic field treatment can also improve the activities of related enzymes in plants. The changes of PAL and other three key enzyme activities during the germination of Tartary buckwheat seeds under different MF intensities was given (96), the specific activity of PAL was the highest at 0.3 t of MF, and that of CHI was the highest at 0.2 t of MF. The results showed that MF stimulation could induce the production of total flavonoids in Tartary buckwheat seeds by regulating the activities of key enzymes. Principal component analysis implied that changes in flavonoids, PAL, CHI, and FLS were highly correlative with antioxidant capacity and enzyme inhibitory activities.

4.2. Gene expression of key enzymes in flavonoid biosynthesis

It has been proved that the key enzyme activity and gene expression in the synthetic pathway are closely related to the environment in which plants live. Light quality, salt stress, and EMF all directly affect the expression of genes involved in plant information transduction and biosynthesis (111). Therefore, it is possible to regulate the activity of key enzymes and gene expression of flavonoid synthesis by different treatments of Tartary buckwheat, so as to achieve scientific and effective regulation of flavonoid synthesis (Table 5).

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Gene expression of key enzymes in flavonoid biosynthesis.

The enhancement of flavonoid content under light processing may be affected by the activation of FtPAL, FtCHS, FtF3H, and FtANS, which promotes the activities of PAL, CHI and other related enzymes in phenylpropanoid metabolic pathway (111). Under light and dark conditions, the expression level of flavonoid synthesis pathway genes could be increased, and higher levels of phenolic compounds, rutin and two anthocyanins were detected, the expression of FtPAL and FtCHIis significantly up-regulated, and the rutin content is about 5 times higher (107). A report also demonstrated that LED treatment could increase the expression levels of regulatory genes such as FtDFR, FtANS and Ft4CL by 7.1-fold, the content of phenolic compounds in Tartary buckwheat also increased with the use of LED lights (150). Compared with dark treatment, different light quality treatments alone and in combination could significantly regulate the gene expression of key enzymes in flavonoid metabolism pathway in Tartary buckwheat. The other studied results showed that the sensitivity of different tissues of Tartary buckwheat to different wavelengths of light and the expression of Ft4CL in cotyledons treated with different red light were significantly increased to 61.6% (p < 0.01) (111). However, the expression level of Ft4CL in the cotyledons treated with LED blue light was significantly increased by 220.8% (p < 0.01). The expression levels of Ft4CL in cotyledons and hypocotyls were significantly increased by 185.0% (p < 0.05), and the expression levels of FtPAL in hypocotyls were significantly decreased by 9.3% (p < 0.05). Another studied that the effects of light quality on ANR, a key synthetic gene in procyanidin metabolism pathway, the expression of FtANR and FtLAR1 was up-regulated after the treatment of blue light, far red light and ultraviolet light, and the expression of FtLAR3 was up-regulated after the treatment of red light (151). This result showed that different light quality could affect the expression of FtANR, FtLAR1 and FtLAR3 in different degrees.

The myeloblastosis oncogene (MYB) transcription factor is notable in flavonoid biosynthesis in buckwheat, which is involved in multiple metabolic pathways of flavonoid biosynthesis and can coordinate with multiple genes to regulate flavonoid biosynthesis (152). Studies have confirmed that FtSAD2 (sensitive to abscisic acid and drought) and FtJAZ1 (inhibitor of JA signaling) can interact synergistically with MYB, thus influencing the accumulation of flavones in Tartary buckwheat (154). The other study confirmed that Fagopyrum tataricum MYB transcription factors FtMYB13, FtMYB14 and FtMYB15 were degraded by jasmonic acid at protein level, which could directly inhibit the expression of FtPAL gene and reduce the accumulation of flavonoids. In addition, FtSAD2 and FtJAZ1, which interact with FtMYB11, FtMYB13, FtMYB14, and FtMYB15, could significantly promote the repressor activity of FtMYBs (protein–protein interaction), thereby affecting flavonoid synthesis (153, 154).

In the cotyledons, the synthetic accumulation of total flavonoids was positively correlated with FtMYB3 and negatively correlated with FtMYB2 expression (155). However, the correlation between PAL, CHI and FLS and FtMYB1, FtMYB2 and FtMYB3 was more complicated, and the regularity between the transcription of key enzyme genes and the expression of transcription factors was not strong. It is inferred that a key enzyme gene of flavonoid synthesis may only be regulated by a specific transcription factor, which precisely opens one or more branches of flavonoid synthesis, the change of total flavonoid content can not reflect this characteristic.

It was found that these key enzyme-encoding contained a great quantity of light-response elements and hormone-response elements through promoter analysis. Furthermore, MYB transcription factors regulated the transcription of the target gene by direct combination with the promoter region of the target gene, thus regulating the synthesis of flavonoids. Yao et al. (158) identified 48 key enzyme-encoding genes involved in flavonoid metabolic pathways, and clarified the structure, evolution and tissue-specific expression patterns of these genes. Therefore, it also explained why light and hormones can induce the expression of flavonoid synthesis-related enzymes in Tartary buckwheat and improve the flavonoid content.

At present, in Tartary buckwheat germination, the MW technology have been applied, the less research of regulatory mechanism of gene expression of enzymes related to flavonoid synthesis is done. The study confirmed that in Tartary buckwheat sprouts, the transcription of various flavonoid biosynthetic enzyme gene containing FtPAL, FtCHI, and FtFLS2 was obviously raised by MW irradiation (300 W/25 ~ 75 s) during cultivation. After 300 W/75 s MW irradiation, the maximum rutin content (25064.19 mg/kg DW) was observed in 5-day-old sprouts, while the maximum chlorogenic acid (497.95 mg/kg DW) and vitexin (345.75 mg/kg DW) were observed after 300 W/50 s MW irradiation (156). The effect mechanism of MW treatment on the germination and flavonoids enrichment of Tartary buckwheat was revealed (157). Besides, label-free quantitative proteomic analysis showed that after the treatment of 300 W/50 s MW, Tartary buckwheat had 7, 5, and 5 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) for 3 ~ 7 days germination compared with the control group. These DEPs were primarily relevant to energy production and conversion, gene expression, and flavonoids metabolism. Based on KEGG (Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes) analysis, the DEPs were mainly concentrated in photosynthesis, RNA polymerase, flavonoid biosynthesis, phenylalanine metabolism, and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis metabolic pathways. Furthermore, the upregulation of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and flavonol synthase protein enzymes promoted germination and flavonoids accumulation in Tartary buckwheat. Another study showed that compared with seeds, chlorogenic acid and rutin content in 7-day-old sprouts increased by 13420.63 and 225.12%, respectively (135). And under the best treatment condition (MW 250 W, 90 s, 2.9 mmol/L L-Phe), the specific activities of PAL, CHI and FLS in 5-day-old sprouts increased by 47.84, 53.04 and 28.02% compared with CK, respectively, and the expression of FtPAL, FtCHI and FtFlS1 increased by 39.84, 24.78 and 33.72% compared with CK, respectively. Hence, MW irradiation is a valid technique to enhance the functional attributes of edible Tartary buckwheat sprouts, but its power condition and exposure time need to be better optimized and determined whether it can promote seed germination.

US and MF treatments are widely used to cereal germination (33), but less used for the key enzymes enrichment of flavonoids in Tartary buckwheat. The regulatory mechanism of these treatments on gene expression of related enzymes is not clear, and further research is needed.

5. Summary

After buckwheat seeds germinated into sprouts, the nutritional value of buckwheat seeds was greatly increased, the trypsin inhibitor activity was low or even disappeared, the proportion of protein and amino acids was more balanced, the nutritional value of fatty acids was increased, and the activity of rutin-degrading enzyme disappeared, especially the content of flavonoids increased obviously. Under adversity, plants produce a large number of flavonoids, GABA and other secondary metabolites to repair the damage caused by adversity. In recent years, the research on the enrichment of flavonoids in buckwheat is limited to the effect on its content, but the research on its biosynthesis and regulation genes is lacking. Therefore, the key regulatory factors in flavonoid synthesis need to be further studied and explored. At the same time, there is still much room for further research on the physiological functions and mechanisms of flavonoid in plants. In the future, researchers can study the mechanism of buckwheat flavonoids enrichment, such as the activities of related endogenous enzymes, the expression of key enzyme genes and key regulatory factors, so as to accumulate specific secondary metabolites, and thus more effectively play unique health care value of buckwheat flavonoids. Through animal experiments, the health effects of buckwheat sprouts can be further clarified, which provides a theoretical basis for the development of deep-processed sprout vegetables with various health functions. The research on these problems has far-reaching significance for promoting the healthy and rapid development of buckwheat industry in our country.

Author contributions

YD and NW: conceptualization. WP, NW, JW, YD, and SW: validation. YD: writing – original draft preparation. SW: writing – review and editing, supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition. WP: visualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 31772025 and Anhui Natural Science Foundation, grant number 1808085MC93.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Tuan, PA, Kumar, R, Rehal, PK, Toora, PK, and Ayele, BT. Molecular mechanisms underlying abscisic acid/gibberellin balance in the control of seed dormancy and germination in cereals. Front Plant Sci. (2018) 9:668. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00668

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Živković, A, Polak, T, Cigić, B, and Požrl, T. Germinated buckwheat: Effects of dehulling on phenolics profile and antioxidant activity of buckwheat seeds. Foods. (2021) 10:740. doi: 10.3390/foods10040740

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Dziki, D, and Gawlik-Dziki, U. 4 - Processing of germinated grains. Sprouted Grains. (2019):69–90. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-811525-1.00004-X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Zhong, L, Lin, Y, Wang, C, Niu, B, Xu, Y, Zhao, G, et al. Chemical profile, antimicrobial and antioxidant activity assessment of the crude extract and its main flavonoids from Tartary buckwheat sprouts. Molecules. (2022) 27:1–12. doi: 10.3390/molecules27020374

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Editorial Committee of Flora of China. Flora of China. Beijing: Science Press (1998).

Google Scholar

6. Bonafaccia, G, Gambelli, L, Fabjan, N, and Kreft, I. Trace elements in flour and bran from common and Tartary buckwheat. Food Chem. (2003) 83:1–5. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00228-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Fabjan, N, Rode, J, Košir, IJ, Wang, Z, Zhang, Z, and Kreft, I. Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn.) as a source of dietary rutin and quercitrin. J Agric Food Chem. (2003) 51:6452–5. doi: 10.1021/jf034543e

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Huang, XY, Zeller, FJ, Huang, KF, Shi, TX, and Chen, QF. Variation of major minerals and trace elements in seeds of Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn.). Genet Resour Crop Evol. (2014) 61:567–77. doi: 10.1007/s10722-013-0057-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Ruan, J, Zhou, Y, Yan, J, Zhou, M, Woo, S-H, Weng, W, et al. Tartary buckwheat: an under-utilized edible and medicinal herb for food and nutritional security. Food Rev Intl. (2022) 38:440–54. doi: 10.1080/87559129.2020.1734610

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Wu, JY, Jiang, L, Ren, WZ, Yang, GY, Chen, K, Li, T, et al. Analysis of nutritional components and evaluation of cooking characteristics of 11 kinds of whole grains and cereals. J Wuhan Polytech Univ. (2022) 41:8–14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-7386.2022.05.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Gong, ES, Luo, SJ, Li, T, Liu, CM, Zhang, GW, Chen, J, et al. Phytochemical profiles and antioxidant activity of brown rice varieties. Food Chem. (2017) 227:432–43. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.01.093

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Li, Y, Ma, D, Sun, D, Wang, C, Zhang, J, Xie, Y, et al. Total phenolic, flavonoid content, and antioxidant activity of flour, noodles, and steamed bread made from different colored wheat grains by three milling methods. Crop J. (2015) 3:328–34. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2015.04.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Mawouma, S, Condurache, NN, Turturică, M, Constantin, OE, Croitoru, C, and Rapeanu, G. Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Profile of Sorghum (Sorghumbicolor (L.) Moench) and Pearl Millet (Pennisetumglaucum (L.) R.Br.) Grains Cultivated in the Far-North Region of Cameroon. Foods. (2022) 11:2026. doi: 10.3390/foods11142026

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Pedro, AC, Granato, D, and Rosso, ND. Extraction of anthocyanins and polyphenols from black rice (Oryza sativa L.) by modeling and assessing their reversibility and stability. Food Chem. (2016) 191:12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.02.045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Shen, Y, Jin, L, Xiao, P, Lu, Y, and Bao, J. Total phenolics, flavonoids, antioxidant capacity in rice grain and their relations to grain color, size and weight. J Cereal Sci. (2009) 49:106–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2008.07.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Tang, S, Mao, G, Yuan, Y, Weng, Y, Zhu, R, Cai, C, et al. Optimization of oat seed steeping and germination temperatures to maximize nutrient content and antioxidant activity. J Food Process Preserv. (2020) 44:e14683. doi: 10.1111/jfpp.14683

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Xiang, N, Guo, X, Liu, F, Li, Q, Hu, J, and Brennan, CS. Effect of light- and dark-germination on the phenolic biosynthesis, phytochemical profiles, and antioxidant activities in sweet corn (Zea mays L.) sprouts. Int J Mol Sci. (2017) 18:1246. doi: 10.3390/ijms18061246

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Hossain, MS, Li, J, Sikdar, A, Hasanuzzaman, M, Uzizerimana, F, Muhammad, I, et al. Exogenous melatonin modulates the physiological and biochemical mechanisms of drought tolerance in Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn). Molecules. (2020) 25:1–24. doi: 10.3390/molecules25122828

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Guo, XD, Ma, YJ, Parry, J, Gao, JM, Yu, LL, and Wang, M. Phenolics content and antioxidant activity of Tartary buckwheat from different locations. Molecules. (2011) 16:9850–67. doi: 10.3390/molecules16129850

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Ishiguro, K, Morishita, T, Ashizawa, J, Suzuki, T, and Noda, T. Antioxidative activities in rutin rich noodles and cookies made with a trace rutinosidase variety of Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn.),‘Manten-Kirari’. Food Sci Technol Res. (2016) 22:557–62. doi: 10.3136/fstr.22.557

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Tolaini, V, del Fiore, A, Nobili, C, Presenti, O, de Rossi, P, Procacci, S, et al. Exploitation of Tartary buckwheat as sustainable ingredient for healthy foods production. Agric Agric Sci Procedia. (2016) 8:455–60. doi: 10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.043

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Kim, SH, Cui, CB, Kang, IJ, Kim, SY, and Ham, SS. Cytotoxic effect of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) hull against cancer cells. J Med Food. (2007) 10:232–8. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2006.1089

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Ren, W, Qiao, Z, Wang, H, Zhu, L, Zhang, L, Lu, Y, et al. Tartary buckwheat flavonoid activates caspase 3 and induces HL-60 cell apoptosis. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. (2001) 23:427–32. doi: 10.1358/mf.2001.23.8.662129

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Nam, TG, Lim, T-G, Lee, BH, Lim, S, Kang, H, Eom, SH, et al. Comparison of anti-inflammatory effects of flavonoid-rich common and Tartary buckwheat sprout extracts in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW 264.7 and peritoneal macrophages. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. (2017, 2017) 2017:9658030. doi: 10.1155/2017/9658030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Kreft, M. Buckwheat phenolic metabolites in health and disease. Nutr Res Rev. (2016) 29:30–9. doi: 10.1017/S0954422415000190

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Qiu, J, Li, Z, Qin, Y, Yue, Y, and And Liu, Y. Therapeutics and clinical risk management dovepress protective effect of Tartary buckwheat on renal function in type 2 diabetics: a randomized controlled trial. Ther Clin Risk Manag. (2016) 12:1721–7. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S123008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Qu, Y, Yasuda, T, Nakajima, K, Hiwatashi, A, Moroi, C, Sanada, H, et al. Effect of rutin in buckwheat noodle on lipid metabolism in rats. Food Sci Technol Res. (2013) 19:1011–8. doi: 10.3136/fstr.19.1011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Kim, SL, Kim, SK, and Park, CH. Introduction and nutritional evaluation of buckwheat sprouts as a new vegetable. Food Res Int. (2004) 37:319–27. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2003.12.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Gan, R-Y, Lui, W-Y, Wu, K, Chan, C-L, Dai, S-H, Sui, Z-Q, et al. Bioactive compounds and bioactivities of germinated edible seeds and sprouts: An updated review. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2017) 59:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2016.11.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Asghar, T, Iqbal, M, Jamil, Y, Zia-ul-Haq,, Nisar, J, and Shahid, M. Comparison of He-Ne laser and sinusoidal non-uniform magnetic field seed pre-sowing treatment effect on glycine max (Var 90-I) germination, growth and yield. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol. (2017) 166:212–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.11.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Ding, J, Johnson, J, Chu, YF, and Feng, H. Enhancement of γ-aminobutyric acid, avenanthramides, and other health-promoting metabolites in germinating oats (Avena sativa L.) treated with and without power ultrasound. Food Chem. (2019) 283:239–47. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.12.136

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Xia, Q, Green, BD, Zhu, Z, Li, Y, Gharibzahedi, SMT, Roohinejad, S, et al. Innovative processing techniques for altering the physicochemical properties of wholegrain brown rice (Oryza sativa L.) – opportunities for enhancing food quality and health attributes. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2019) 59:3349–70. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2018.1491829

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Rifna, EJ, Ratish Ramanan, K, and Mahendran, R. Emerging technology applications for improving seed germination. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2019) 86:95–108. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.029

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Bhinder, S, Singh, N, and Kaur, A. Impact of germination on nutraceutical, functional and gluten free muffin making properties of Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum). Food Hydrocoll. (2022) 124:107268. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107268

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Fonteles, M, Almeida, M, and Larner, J. Antihyperglycemic effects of 3-O-methyl-D-chiro-inositol and D-chiro-inositol associated with manganese in streptozotocin diabetic rats. Horm Metab Res. (2000) 32:129–32. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-978606

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Jeong, H, Sung, J, Yang, J, Kim, Y, Jeong, HS, and Lee, J. Effect of sucrose on the functional composition and antioxidant capacity of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum M.) sprouts. J Funct Foods. (2018) 43:70–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2018.01.019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Bian, ZX, Wang, JF, Ma, H, Wang, SM, Luo, L, and Wang, SM. Effect of microwave radiation on antioxidant capacities of Tartary buckwheat sprouts. J Food Sci Technol. (2020) 57:3913–9. doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04451-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Almuhayawi, MS, Hassan, AHA, Abdel-Mawgoud, M, Khamis, G, Selim, S, Al Jaouni, SK, et al. Laser light as a promising approach to improve the nutritional value, antioxidant capacity and anti-inflammatory activity of flavonoid-rich buckwheat sprouts. Food Chem. (2021) 345:128788. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128788

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Hu, WH, Chang, ZY, Gao, HL, and And Jia, CF. Acid alpha-galactosidase is involved in D-chiro-inositol accumulation during Tartary buckwheat germination. Acta Soc Bot Pol. (2015) 84:53–8. doi: 10.5586/asbp.2015.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Qin, P, Wei, A, Zhao, D, Yao, Y, Yang, X, Dun, B, et al. Low concentration of sodium bicarbonate improves the bioactive compound levels and antioxidant and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities of Tartary buckwheat sprouts. Food Chem. (2017) 224:124–30. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.12.059

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Wang, L, Li, X, Niu, M, Wang, R, and Chen, Z. Effect of additives on flavonoids, d-chiro-Inositol and trypsin inhibitor during the germination of Tartary buckwheat seeds. J Cereal Sci. (2013) 58:348–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2013.07.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Qin, L, Ding, J, Yong, X, and Endocrinology, DO. Meta analysis on effects of resistant starch on metabolism of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Chongqing Med. (2017) 46:5141–4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2017.36.033

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Molska, M, Reguła, J, Zielińska-Dawidziak, M, Tomczak, A, and Świeca, M. Starch and protein analysis in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) sprouts enriched with probiotic yeast. Lwt. (2022) 168:113903. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113903

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Liu, T, Wang, H, Xiao, Y, Yan, B, Zhou, X, and Zhou, Y. Effect of dietary supplementation of Tartary buckwheat on physiological metabolism and intestinal glora in mice with high-fat diet induced dyslipidemia. Food Sci. (2018) 39:172–7. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201801026

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Zhou, Y, Wang, H, Cui, L, Zhou, X, Tang, W, and Song, X. Evolution of nutrient ingredients in Tartary buckwheat seeds during germination. Food Chem. (2015) 186:244–8. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.03.115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. He, XL, Lei, TW, Xu, QZ, and And Li, HM. Study on antioxidant activity in vitro of Tartary buckwheat proteins extracted by different methods. J Anhui Agric Sci. (2017) 45:134–5. doi: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2017.25.042

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Luo, X, Fei, Y, Xu, Q, Zhang, L, Lei, T, and Li, H. Optimization for hydrolysis of Tartary buckwheat protein with alkaline protease and its antioxidant activity. Food Industry. (2019) 40:137–41.

Google Scholar

48. Zhang, C, Zhang, R, Li, YM, Liang, N, Zhao, Y, Zhu, H, et al. Cholesterol-lowering activity of Tartary buckwheat protein. J Agric Food Chem. (2017) 65:1900–6. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b00066

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Lee, MS, Shin, Y, Jung, S, Kim, SY, Jo, YH, Kim, CT, et al. The inhibitory effect of Tartary buckwheat extracts on adipogenesis and inflammatory response. Molecules. (2017) 22:1160. doi: 10.3390/molecules22071160

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Li, BC, Li, YQ, and And Hu, QB. Antioxidant activity of flavonoids from Tartary buckwheat bran. Toxicol Environ Chem. (2016) 98:429–38. doi: 10.1080/02772248.2015.1123486

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Bao, T, Wang, Y, Sun, C, Niu, X, Yang, H, Chen, V, et al. Optimization of flavonoids extraction from Tartary buckwheat rice and analysis of its hypoglycemic activity. Trans Chin Soc Agric Engin. (2016) 32:383–9. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.z2.054

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Hou, Z, Hu, Y, Yang, X, and Chen, W. Antihypertensive effects of Tartary buckwheat flavonoids by improvement of vascular insulin sensitivity in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Food Funct. (2017) 8:4217–28. doi: 10.1039/C7FO00975E

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Peng, LX, Wei, LJ, Yi, Q, Chen, GH, Yao, ZD, Yan, ZY, et al. In vitro potential of flavonoids from Tartary buckwheat on antioxidants activity and starch digestibility. Int J Food Sci Technol. (2019) 54:2209–18. doi: 10.1111/ijfs.14131

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Tomotake, H, Yamamoto, N, Kitabayashi, H, Kawakami, A, Kayashita, J, Ohinata, H, et al. Preparation of Tartary buckwheat protein product and its Improving effect on cholesterol metabolism in rats and mice fed cholesterol-enriched diet. J Food Sci. (2007) 72:S528–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00474.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Calder, PC. n–3 Fatty acids and cardiovascular disease: evidence explained and mechanisms explored. Clin Sci. (2004) 107:1–11. doi: 10.1042/CS20040119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Hassinen, JB, Durbin, GT, and Bernhart, FW. The bacteriostatic effects of saturated fatty acids. Arch Biochem Biophys. (1951) 31:183–9. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(51)90204-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Hogan, JS, Pankey, JW, and Duthie, AH. Growth inhibition of mastitis pathogens by long-chain fatty acids. J Dairy Sci. (1987) 70:927–34. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80096-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Nam, TG, Kim, D-O, and Eom, SH. Effects of light sources on major flavonoids and antioxidant activity in common buckwheat sprouts. Food Sci Biotechnol. (2018) 27:169–76. doi: 10.1007/s10068-017-0204-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Gao, J, Kreft, I, Chao, G, Wang, Y, Liu, X, Wang, L, et al. Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn.) starch, a side product in functional food production, as a potential source of retrograded starch. Food Chem. (2016) 190:552–8. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.05.122

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Qin, P, Wang, Q, Shan, F, Hou, Z, and Ren, G. Nutritional composition and flavonoids content of flour from different buckwheat cultivars. Int J Food Sci Technol. (2010) 45:951–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02231.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Zhu, F. Buckwheat starch: Structures, properties, and applications. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2016) 49:121–35. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2015.12.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Majzoobi, M, Radi, M, Farahnaky, A, Jamalian, J, Tongtang, T, and Mesbahi, G. Physicochemical properties of pre-gelatinized wheat starch produced by a twin drum drier. J Agric Sci Technol. (2011) 85:72–101. doi: 10.3098/ah.2011.85.1.72

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Li, W, Cao, F, Fan, J, Ouyang, S, Luo, Q, Zheng, J, et al. Physically modified common buckwheat starch and their physicochemical and structural properties. Food Hydrocoll. (2014) 40:237–44. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.03.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Liu, H, Guo, X, Li, W, Wang, X, Lv, M, Peng, Q, et al. Changes in physicochemical properties and in vitro digestibility of common buckwheat starch by heat-moisture treatment and annealing. Carbohydr Polym. (2015) 132:237–44. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.06.071

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Liu, H, Wang, L, Shen, M, Guo, X, Lv, M, and And Wang, M. Changes in physicochemical properties and in vitro digestibility of Tartary buckwheat and sorghum starches induced by annealing. Starch Stärke. (2016) 68:709–18. doi: 10.1002/star.201500261

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Liu, H, Lv, M, Peng, Q, Shan, F, and Wang, M. Physicochemical and textural properties of Tartary buckwheat starch after heat–moisture treatment at different moisture levels. Starch Stärke. (2015) 67:276–84. doi: 10.1002/star.201400143

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Xiao, Y, Liu, H, Wei, T, Shen, J, and Wang, M. Differences in physicochemical properties and in vitro digestibility between Tartary buckwheat flour and starch modified by heat-moisture treatment. LWT. (2017) 86:285–92. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.08.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Xiaoli, Z, Lina, D, Qingyi, J, and Yiming, Z. Ultra-high pressure treatment improving physicochemical properties and probiotic community of Tartary buckwheat starch. Trans Chin Soc Agric Engin. (2019) 35:284–92. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201709011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Liu, H, Guo, X, Li, Y, Li, H, Fan, H, and Wang, M. In vitro digestibility and changes in physicochemical and textural properties of Tartary buckwheat starch under high hydrostatic pressure. J Food Eng. (2016) 189:64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.05.015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Haenen, D, Zhang, J, Souza da Silva, C, Bosch, G, van der Meer, IM, van Arkel, J, et al. A diet high in resistant starch modulates microbiota composition, SCFA concentrations, and gene expression in pig intestine. J Nutr. (2013) 143:274–83. doi: 10.3945/jn.112.169672

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Hoffmann Sardá, FA, Giuntini, EB, Gomez, MLPA, Lui, MCY, Negrini, JAE, Tadini, CC, et al. Impact of resistant starch from unripe banana flour on hunger, satiety, and glucose homeostasis in healthy volunteers. J Funct Foods. (2016) 24:63–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2016.04.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Zhou, YM, Zhou, XL, Xiao, Y, Liu, N, and Chen, Y. Effect of germination on physicochemical properties of Tartary buckwheat starch. Adv Mater Res. (2013) 634-638:1454–9. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.1601

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Li, EW. Effect of Tartary buckwheat protein on the growth of harmful bacteria in intestinal. Sci Technol Food Ind. (2017) 38:306–9. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.15.057

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Wang, J, Xiao, J, Liu, X, Geng, F, Huang, Q, Zhao, J, et al. Analysis of Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum) seed proteome using offline two-dimensional liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. J Food Biochem. (2019) 43:e12863. doi: 10.1111/jfbc.12863

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Thanhaeuser, SM, Wieser, H, and Koehler, P. Spectrophotometric and fluorimetric quantitation of quality-related protein fractions of wheat flour. J Cereal Sci. (2015) 62:58–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2014.12.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Wang, S, Xu, X, Wang, S, Wang, J, and Peng, W. Effects of microwave treatment on structure, functional properties and antioxidant activities of germinated Tartary buckwheat protein. Foods. (2022) 11:1373. doi: 10.3390/foods11101373

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Luo, X, Fei, Y, Xu, Q, Lei, T, Mo, X, Wang, Z, et al. Isolation and identification of antioxidant peptides from Tartary buckwheat albumin (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn.) and their antioxidant activities. J Food Sci. (2020) 85:611–7. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.15004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Hu, Y, Zhao, Y, Ren, D, Guo, J, Luo, Y, and Yang, X. Hypoglycemic and hepatoprotective effects of d-chiro-inositol-enriched Tartary buckwheat extract in high fructose-fed mice. Food Funct. (2015) 6:3760–9. doi: 10.1039/C5FO00612K

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Bhinder, S, Kaur, A, Singh, B, Yadav, MP, and Singh, N. Proximate composition, amino acid profile, pasting and process characteristics of flour from different Tartary buckwheat varieties. Food Res Int. (2020) 130:108946. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108946

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Zhang, M, Wu, J, Zhao, L, and Hu, X. Changes of amino acid content of F. tartaricum gaerth and F. esculentum moench after germination and the nutritional evaluation. Food Ferment Indust. (2005) 31:115–8. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-990X.2005.03.029

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Burbulis, IE, and Winkelshirley, B. Interactions among enzymes of the Arabidopsis flavonoid biosynthetic pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (1999) 96:12929–34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.22.12929

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Ben Rejeb, K, Abdelly, C, and Savouré, A. How reactive oxygen species and proline face stress together. Plant Physiol Biochem. (2014) 80:278–84. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.04.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Ma, H, Xu, X, Wang, S, Wang, J, and Wang, S. Effects of microwave irradiation of Fagopyrum tataricum seeds on the physicochemical and functional attributes of sprouts. LWT. (2022) 165:113738. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113738

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Jing, R, Li, HQ, Hu, CL, Jiang, YP, Qin, LP, and Zheng, CJ. Phytochemical and pharmacological profiles of three fagopyrum buckwheats. Int J Mol Sci. (2016) 17:589. doi: 10.3390/ijms17040589

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Suzuki, T, Honda, Y, Funatsuki, W, and Nakatsuka, K. Purification and characterization of flavonol 3-glucosidase, and its activity during ripening in Tartary buckwheat seeds. Plant Sci. (2002) 163:417–23. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00158-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Li, S-J, Bai, Y-C, Li, C-L, Yao, H-P, Chen, H, Zhao, H-X, et al. Anthocyanins accumulate in Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum) sprout in response to cold stress. Acta Physiol Plant. (2015) 37:159. doi: 10.1007/s11738-015-1913-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Bao, T, Wang, Y, Li, YT, Vemana, G, Niu, XH, Yang, HY, et al. Antioxidant and antidiabetic properties of Tartary buckwheat rice flavonoids after in vitro digestion. J Zhejiang Univers Science B. (2016) 17:941–51. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1600243

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Hu, Y, Zhao, Y, Yuan, L, and Yang, X. Protective effects of Tartary buckwheat flavonoids on high TMAO diet-induced vascular dysfunction and liver injury in mice. Food Funct. (2015) 6:3359–72. doi: 10.1039/C5FO00581G

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Park, CH, Yeo, HJ, Park, YJ, Morgan, AM, Valan Arasu, M, al-Dhabi, N, et al. Influence of indole-3-acetic acid and gibberellic acid on phenylpropanoid accumulation in common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) sprouts. Molecules. (2017) 22:374. doi: 10.3390/molecules22030374

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Zhang, G, Xu, Z, Gao, Y, Huang, X, Zou, Y, and Yang, T. Effects of germination on the nutritional properties, phenolic profiles, and antioxidant activities of buckwheat. J Food Sci. (2015) 80:H1111–9. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12830

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Hao, JX, Wu, TJ, Li, HY, Wang, W, and Liu, HJ. Dual effects of slightly acidic electrolyzed water (SAEW) treatment on the accumulation of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and rutin in germinated buckwheat. Food Chem. (2016) 201:87–93. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.01.037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Liu, M, Ma, Z, Zheng, T, Sun, W, Zhang, Y, Jin, W, et al. Insights into the correlation between Physiological changes in and seed development of Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn.). BMC Genomics. (2018) 19:648. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5036-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Ji, HB, Tang, W, Zhou, XL, and And Wu, Y. Combined effects of blue and ultraviolet lights on the accumulation of flavonoids in Tartary buckwheat sprouts. Polish J Food Nutr Sci. (2016) 66:93–8. doi: 10.1515/pjfns-2015-0042

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Zhang, DC, Liu, H-J, Liu, R, and And Hao, J-X. Effect of ultrasonic treatment on nutritional accumulation and antioxidant activity of common buckwheat. Sci Technol Food Industry. (2015) 36:69-73+78. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2015.07.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Wang, S., And Wang, J. (2017). Ultrasonic enhancement of Tartary buckwheat germination and the production of nutrients in sprouts. Food Machinery 33, 163–168. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0977.2019.05.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Zhou, X, Fang, X, Zhou, Y, Ou, YQ, Lü, Z, and And Ma, J. Effect of magnetic field stimulation on flavonoid synthesis in Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum gaertn.)sprouts. Food Sci. (2012) 33:20–3.

Google Scholar

97. Wang, S, Wang, J, and Guo, Y. Microwave irradiation enhances the germination rate of Tartary buckwheat and content of some compounds in its sprouts. Polish J Food Nutr Sci. (2018) 68:195–205. doi: 10.1515/pjfns-2017-0025

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Peng, LX, Zou, L, Tan, ML, Deng, YY, Yan, J, Yan, ZY, et al. Free amino acids, fatty acids and phenolic compounds in Tartary buckwheat of different hull colour. Czech J Food Sci. (2017) 35:214–22. doi: 10.17221/185/2016-CJFS

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Mitić, N, Miraula, M, Selleck, C, Hadler, KS, Uribe, E, Pedroso, MM, et al. Chapter three - catalytic mechanisms of metallohydrolases containing two metal ions. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. (2014) 97:49–81. doi: 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2014.07.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Kitasato, H. Membrane potential genesis in Nitella cells, mitochondria, and thylakoids. J Plant Res. (2003) 116:401–18. doi: 10.1007/s10265-003-0108-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Liu, CL, Chen, YS, Yang, JH, and Chiang, BH. Antioxidant activity of Tartary ( Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn.) and common ( Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) buckwheat sprouts. J Agric Food Chem. (2008) 56:173–8. doi: 10.1021/jf072347s

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Sim, U, Sung, J, Lee, H, Heo, H, Jeong, HS, and Lee, J. Effect of calcium chloride and sucrose on the composition of bioactive compounds and antioxidant activities in buckwheat sprouts. Food Chem. (2020) 312:126075. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.126075

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

103. Hu, Y, Hou, Z, Yi, R, Wang, Z, Sun, P, Li, G, et al. Tartary buckwheat flavonoids ameliorate high fructose-induced insulin resistance and oxidative stress associated with the insulin signaling and Nrf2/HO-1 pathways in mice. Food Funct. (2017) 8:2803–16. doi: 10.1039/C7FO00359E

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Chen, BX, Li, WY, Gao, YT, Chen, ZJ, Zhang, WN, Liu, QJ, et al. Involvement of polyamine oxidase-produced hydrogen peroxide during coleorhiza-limited germination of rice seeds. Front Plant Sci. (2016) 7. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01219

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

105. Lee, SW, Seo, JM, Lee, MK, Chun, JH, Antonisamy, P, Arasu, MV, et al. Influence of different LED lamps on the production of phenolic compounds in common and Tartary buckwheat sprouts. Indust Crops Products. (2014) 54:320–6. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.01.024

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

106. Shin, J, Kang, MJ, Kim, HJ, Park, JI, Yang, JY, and And Kim, GD. Effect of LED light strength for enhancing rutin content in Tatary buckwheat sprouts and antioxidant activity. J Life Sci. (2018) 28:977–84. doi: 10.5352/JLS.2018.28.8.977

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

107. Thwe, AA, Kim, YB, Li, X, Seo, JM, Kim, S-J, Suzuki, T, et al. Effects of light-emitting diodes on expression of phenylpropanoid biosynthetic genes and accumulation of phenylpropanoids in Fagopyrum tataricum sprouts. J Agric Food Chem. (2014) 62:4839–45. doi: 10.1021/jf501335q

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

108. Luo, X, Zhao, H, Yao, P, Li, Q, Huang, Y, Li, C, et al. An R2R3-MYB transcription factor FtMYB15 involved in the synthesis of anthocyanin and proanthocyanidins from Tartary buckwheat. J Plant Growth Regul. (2018) 37:76–84. doi: 10.1007/s00344-017-9709-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

109. Suzuki, T, Honda, Y, and Mukasa, Y. Effects of UV-B radiation, cold and desiccation stress on rutin concentration and rutin glucosidase activity in Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum) leaves. Plant Sci. (2005) 168:1303–7. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.01.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

110. Zhang, X, Bian, Z, Yuan, X, Chen, X, and Lu, C. A review on the effects of light-emitting diode (LED) light on the nutrients of sprouts and microgreens. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2020) 99:203–16. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.02.031

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

111. Luo, XP, Bu, XX, Zhao, HX, Li, CL, Chen, H, Wang, AH, et al. Effects of LED lights on the levels of flavonoid during germination of Tartary buckwheat. Food Sci. (2015) 36:86–9. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201503016

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Dominguez Pacheco, A, Aguilar, C, Cruz-Orea, A, Carballo, A, Zepeda-Bautista, R, and Ortíz, EM. Influence of the electromagnetic field in maize seed vigor. Rev Fitotec Mex. (2010) 56:104–7. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2009.10.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Pittman, UJ, Carefoot, JM, and Ormrod, DP. Effect of magnetic seed treatment on amylolytic activity of quiescent and germinating barley and wheat seeds. Can J Plant Sci. (1979) 59:1007–11. doi: 10.4141/cjps79-158

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

114. Zheng, S, and Xu, J. Effect of magnetic treatment on seed germination and photosynthetic characteristics of wheat. J Triticeae Crops. (2009) 81:1121–30. doi: 10.1080/00949651003724790

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

115. Payez, A, Ghanati, F, Behmanesh, M, Abdolmaleki, P, Hajnorouzi, A, and Rajabbeigi, E. Increase of seed germination, growth and membrane integrity of wheat seedlings by exposure to static and a 10-KHz electromagnetic field. Electromagn Biol Med. (2013) 32:417–29. doi: 10.3109/15368378.2012.735625

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Kouchebagh, SB, Rasouli, P, Babaiy, AH, and Khanlou, A. Seed germination of pot marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) as affected by physical priming techniques. Int J Biosci. (2015) 5:113–8. doi: 10.12692/ijb/5.5.113-118

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

117. Hamada, E. Effects of microwave treatment on growth, photosynthetic pigments and some metabolites of wheat. Biol Plant. (2007) 51:343–5. doi: 10.1007/s10535-007-0068-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

118. Jia, C, Tang, L, Huang, F, Deng, Q, Huang, Q, Zheng, M, et al. Effect of ultrasound or microwave-assisted germination on nutritional properties in flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) with enhanced antioxidant activity. ACS. Food Sci Technol. (2021) 1:1456–63. doi: 10.1021/acsfoodscitech.1c00110

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

119. Qiu, ZB, Guo, JL, Zhang, MM, Lei, MY, and Li, ZL. Nitric oxide acts as a signal molecule in microwave pretreatment induced cadmium tolerance in wheat seedlings. Acta Physiol Plant. (2013) 35:65–73. doi: 10.1007/s11738-012-1048-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

120. Wu, XH, Luo, GQ, and And Feng, JM. Effects of microwave treatment on the nitrogen metabolism of oat seedlings under Na2CO3 stress. J Microwaves. (2017) 6:91–6. doi: 10.14183/j.cnki.1005-6122.201701020

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

121. Chen, YP, Jia, JF, and Han, XL. Weak microwave can alleviate water deficit induced by osmotic stress in wheat seedlings. Planta. (2009) 229:291–8. doi: 10.1007/s00425-008-0828-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

122. Wang, DX, Liu, Y, Cao, YISR, Li, GT, and Gao, MX. Lethal effects of microwave treatment on Sitophilus oryzae linnaeus and germination rate of wheat Journal of Nuclear. Agric Sci. (2011) 25:105–9. doi: 10.11869/hnxb.2011.01.0105

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

123. Liu, H, Li, Z, Zhang, X, Liu, Y, JianGuo, H, Yang, C, et al. The effects of ultrasound on the growth, nutritional quality and microbiological quality of sprouts. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2021) 111:292–300. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.065

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

124. Mota, MJ, Lopes, RP, Koubaa, M, Roohinejad, S, Barba, FJ, Delgadillo, I, et al. Fermentation at non-conventional conditions in food- and bio-sciences by the application of advanced processing technologies. Crit Rev Biotechnol. (2018) 38:122–40. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2017.1312272

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

125. Yang, H, Gao, J, Yang, A, and Chen, H. The ultrasound-treated soybean seeds improve edibility and nutritional quality of soybean sprouts. Food Res Int. (2015) 77:704–10. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.01.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

126. Yaldagard, M, Mortazavi, SA, and Tabatabaie, F. The effectiveness of ultrasound treatment on the germination stimulation of barley seed and its alpha-amylase activity. Proceed World Acad Sci Engineer Technol. (2007) 23:489–92.

Google Scholar

127. Cakmak, T, Dumlupinar, R, and Erdal, S. Acceleration of germination and early growth of wheat and bean seedlings grown under various magnetic field and osmotic conditions. Bioelectromagnetics. (2010) 31:120–9. doi: 10.1002/bem.20537

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

128. Deng, Y, Padilla-Zakour, O, Zhao, Y, and Tao, S. Influences of high hydrostatic pressure, microwave heating, and boiling on chemical compositions, antinutritional factors, fatty acids, in vitro protein digestibility, and microstructure of buckwheat. Food Bioprocess Technol. (2015) 8:2235–45. doi: 10.1007/s11947-015-1578-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

129. Bigu-Del-Blanco, J, Bristow, JM, and Romero-Sierra, C. Effects of low-level microwave radiation on germination and growth rate in corn seeds. Proc IEEE. (1977) 65:1086–8. doi: 10.1109/PROC.1977.10636

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

130. Tran, VN. Effects of microwave energy on the strophiole, seed coat and germination of acacia seeds. Funct Plant Biol. (1979) 6:277–87. doi: 10.1071/PP9790277

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

131. Wang, J, Ma, H, and Wang, S. Application of ultrasound, microwaves, and magnetic fields techniques in the germination of cereals. Food Sci Technol Res. (2019) 25:489–97. doi: 10.3136/fstr.25.489

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

132. Anand, A, Nagarajan, S, Joshi, DK, Verma, A, and Kar, A. Microwave seed treatment reduces hardseededness in Stylosanthes seabrana and promotes redistribution of cellular water as studied by NMR relaxation measurements. Seed Sci Technol. (2009) 37:88–97. doi: 10.15258/sst.2009.37.1.11

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

133. Schmidt, M, Zannini, E, and Arendt, EK. Recent advances in physical post-harvest treatments for shelf-life extension of cereal crops. Foods. (2018) 7:45. doi: 10.3390/foods7040045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

134. Manickavasagan, A, Jayas, D, and White, N. Germination of wheat grains from uneven microwave heating in an industrial microwave dryer. Can Biosyst Eng. (2007) 49:3.

Google Scholar

135. Peng, W, Wang, N, Wang, S, Wang, J, and Bian, Z. Effect of co-treatment of microwave and exogenous l-phenylalanine on the enrichment of flavonoids in Tartary buckwheat sprouts. J Sci Food Agric. (2022) 103:2014–22. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.12263

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

136. Hashemi, SMB, Khaneghah, AM, Saraiva, JA, Jambrak, AR, Barba, FJ, and Mota, MJ. Effect of ultrasound on lactic acid production by Lactobacillus strains in date (Phoenix dactylifera var. Kabkab) syrup. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. (2018) 102:2635–44. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-8789-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

137. Xie, M, Yu, M, Zhang, L, and Shi, T. Transcriptome and proteome analysis of ultrasound pretreated peanut sprouts. Food Chem Molecular Sci. (2022) 4:100102. doi: 10.1016/j.fochms.2022.100102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

138. Srikanth, D. Influence of magnetic and electric field on germination attributes of chilli (Capsicum annum L.) seeds. Int J Pure Appl Biosci. (2018) 6:496–501. doi: 10.18782/2320-7051.6723

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

139. Ragha, L, Mishra, S, Ramachandran, V, Bhatia, MS, and Roman, A. The effect of low-intensity electromagnetic microwave field on seed germination. Proceed Timiryazev Agric Acad. (1996) 03:165–71. doi: 10.4236/jemaa.2011.35027

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

140. Shine, MB, Guruprasad, KN, and Anand, A. Enhancement of germination, growth, and photosynthesis in soybean by pre-treatment of seeds with magnetic field. Bioelectromagnetics. (2011) 32:474–84. doi: 10.1002/bem.20656

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

141. Pelletier, MK, Burbulis, IE, and Winkelshirley, B. Disruption of specific flavonoid genes enhances the accumulation of flavonoid enzymes and end-products in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Mol Biol. (1999) 40:45–54. doi: 10.1023/A:1026414301100

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

142. Mierziak, J, Kostyn, K, Kulma,, and Anna,. Flavonoids as important molecules of plant interactions with the environment. Molecules. (2014) 19:16240–65. doi: 10.3390/molecules191016240

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

143. Falcone Ferreyra, ML, Rius, S, and Casati, P. Flavonoids: biosynthesis, biological functions, and biotechnological applications. Front Plant Sci. (2012) 3:222. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00222

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

144. Besseau, SB, Hoffmann, L, Geoffroy, P, Lapierre, C, Pollet, B, and AND Legrand, M. Flavonoid accumulation in Arabidopsis repressed in lignin synthesis affects auxin transport and plant growth. Plant Cell. (2007) 19:148–62. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.044495

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

145. Spitaler, R, Schlorhaufer, PD, Ellmerer, EP, Merfort, I, Bortenschlager, S, Stuppner, H, et al. Altitudinal variation of secondary metabolite profiles in flowering heads of Arnica montana cv. ARBO Phytochem. (2006) 67:409–17. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.11.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

146. Liu, R, Xu, S, Li, J, Hu, Y, and Lin, Z. Expression profile of a PAL gene from Astragalus membranaceus var. Mongholicus and its crucial role in flux into flavonoid biosynthesis. Plant Cell Rep. (2006) 25:705–10. doi: 10.1007/s00299-005-0072-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

147. Li, X, Kim, YB, Kim, Y, Zhao, S, Kim, HH, Chung, E, et al. Differential stress-response expression of two flavonol synthase genes and accumulation of flavonols in Tartary buckwheat. J Plant Physiol. (2013) 170:1630–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2013.06.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

148. Anterola, AM, and Lewis, NG. Trends in lignin modification: a comprehensive analysis of the effects of genetic manipulations/mutations on lignification and vascular integrity. Phytochemistry. (2002) 61:221–94. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(02)00211-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

149. Ciupak, A, Szczurowska, I, Gladyszewska, B, and Pietruszewski, S. Impact of laser light and magnetic field stimulation on the process of buckwheat seed germination. Tech Sci. (2011) 10:8–10. doi: 10.2478/v10022-007-0002-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

150. Seo, JM, Arasu, MV, Kim, YB, Park, SU, and Kim, SJ. Phenylalanine and LED lights enhance phenolic compound production in Tartary buckwheat sprouts. Food Chem. (2015) 177:204–13. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.12.094

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

151. Jiang, CL, Xin Yao, SU, Ya Chun, XU, Er Yi, WU, Shi, YH, Dong, Z, et al. Influence of light on gene expression of key synthesis enzyme genes FtANR and FtLAR about proanthocyanidin in seeds of homologous plant of food and medicine Fagopyrum tataricum. China J Chin Materia Medica. (2018) 43:469–77. doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20180105.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

152. Schijlen, EGWM, Ric de Vos, CH, van Tunen, AJ, and Bovy, AG. Modification of flavonoid biosynthesis in crop plants. Phytochemistry. (2004) 65:2631–48. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.07.028

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

153. Zhang, K, Logacheva, MD, Meng, Y, Hu, J, Wan, D, Li, L, et al. Jasmonate-responsive MYB factors spatially repress rutin biosynthesis in Fagopyrum tataricum. J Exp Bot. (2018) 69:1955–66. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

154. Zhou, M, Sun, Z, Ding, M, Logacheva, MD, Kreft, I, Wang, D, et al. FtSAD2 and FtJAZ1 regulate activity of the FtMYB11 transcription repressor of the phenylpropanoid pathway in Fagopyrum tataricum. New Phytol. (2017) 216:814–28. doi: 10.1111/nph.14692

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

155. Zhao, HX, Wu, XF, Chen, BY, Li, C-L, Chen, H, Shao, JR, et al. Gene expression analysis of key enzymes and MYB transcription factors in flavonoid biosynthesis pathway during germination of Fagopyrum tataricum. J Agric Biotechnol. (2012) 20:121–8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7968.2012.02.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

156. Ma, H, Xu, X, Wang, S, Wang, J, and Peng, W. Effects of microwave irradiation on the expression of key flavonoid biosynthetic enzyme genes and the accumulation of flavonoid products in Fagopyrum tataricum sprouts. J Cereal Sci. (2021) 101:103275. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2021.103275

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

157. Wang, S, Wang, S, Wang, J, and Peng, W. Label-free quantitative proteomics reveals the mechanism of microwave-induced Tartary buckwheat germination and flavonoids enrichment. Food Res Int. (2022) 160:111758. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111758

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

158. Yao, Y, Sun, L, Wu, W, Wang, S, Xiao, X, Hu, M, et al. Genome wide investigation of major enzyme-encoding genes in the flavonoid metabolic pathway in Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum). J Mol Evol. (2021) 89:269–86. doi: 10.1007/s00239-021-10004-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Tartary buckwheat, sprouts, nutrition components, flavonoid, physical technology

Citation: Dong Y, Wang N, Wang S, Wang J and Peng W (2023) A review: The nutrition components, active substances and flavonoid accumulation of Tartary buckwheat sprouts and innovative physical technology for seeds germinating. Front. Nutr. 10:1168361. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1168361

Received: 17 February 2023; Accepted: 15 June 2023;
Published: 05 July 2023.

Edited by:

Marcio Schmiele, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Brazil

Reviewed by:

Silvia Leticia Rivero Mezs, Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil
Nathália Neves, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Brazil

Copyright © 2023 Dong, Wang, Wang, Wang and Peng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Shunmin Wang, wangshunmin@126.com

Download