Skip to main content

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Nutr., 30 November 2022
Sec. Nutritional Immunology
Volume 9 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.1036536

Intestinal proline is a potential anti-allergy factor for allergy diagnosis and therapy

Jinya Ma1 Chong Wang1 Fangting Wang1 Yong Zhang2 Yinghua Liu2 Jiachao Zhang3 Zhongshan Gao4 Yi Zhang5 Hujun Xie1 Yanbo Wang1 Linglin Fu1*
  • 1Food Safety Key Laboratory of Zhejiang Province, School of Food Science and Biotechnology, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China
  • 2Department of Nutrition, The First Medical Center of People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 3Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Functional Food of Hainan Province, College of Food Science and Engineering, Hainan University, Haikou, China
  • 4Allergy Research Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
  • 5College of Food Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China

Allergy has become a public health problem worldwide, but effective diagnostic and therapeutic approaches are limited currently. Amino acids are essential macronutrients that potentially participated in the allergy process. This work aimed to investigate whether amino acids can be applied as a mediator for allergy diagnosis and therapy. Two cohort studies were performed to investigate the correlation between fecal amino acids and allergy responses, and a spleen cell model was used to validate the role of amino acids in regulating allergy. In a cohort study with 193 volunteers, fecal proline was found to be negatively correlated with serum IgE, and detailed data analysis revealed that people with high-IgE-mediated allergy had decreased odds of high intestinal proline. In another cohort study with distinct allergic and non-allergic individuals, proline concentration was significantly lower in the allergic group. Daily diet and metagenomics analysis showed that the proline intake and microbiota amino acid metabolism were not significantly different, implying that the body’s proline metabolism might be different between allergic and non-allergic individuals. Furthermore, the spleen cell model demonstrated that proline specifically targeted Th2 and Treg activity. Overall, this work revealed a tight correlation between gut proline and serum IgE, indicating proline as a promising biomarker and a potential therapeutic method for allergic diseases.

Introduction

Allergy has become a public health problem with increasing prevalence worldwide, which afflicts 10–40% population in different countries worldwide, and the prevalence keeps increasing rapidly (1). Although a lot of effort has been put into controlling allergic diseases, effective diagnostic, and therapeutic approaches are limited currently (24).

Diagnosing allergic diseases is the basis for controlling them. Skin test (such as skin prick test) and oral challenge test (for food allergy) are commonly used in vivo diagnostic methods for allergy, but these approaches may show false positive outcomes and have potential risks of systemic reactions (5). In addition, professional and experienced operators are required to perform the tests, which limits the application situations. On the other hand, in vitro tests based on biomarkers are more convenient and safer diagnostic methods and are thus more suitable for some application situations such as large-scale screening. IgE (both non-specific and allergen-specific) is the most commonly used biomarker for allergy tests, while histamine and eosinophilia were also capable to indicate allergic responses in some situations (5, 6). However, measuring these biomarkers requires blood samples, and the results are less reliable than those from in vivo tests in most cases, and more reliable, convenient, and non-destructive biomarkers that are suitable for large-scale screening are currently absent.

Several therapeutic methods have been developed for allergies. For example, antihistamines and anti-IgE monoclonal antibodies are efficient treatment methods for allergic diseases, but the duration is relatively short, and the side effects cannot be ignored (7). On the other hand, allergen immunotherapy is a long-term effective method, but the allergen-specificity avoids broad-spectrum anti-allergic effects, and the potential risks also limited the applications (8).

Therefore, novel diagnostic and therapeutic methods for allergies are urgently needed. The elucidation of in vivo targets will facilitate the development of novel control approaches for allergic diseases. Amino acids are essential macronutrients for humans, it has been reported that particular amino acids can regulate the immune system (9), and some amino acids in the gut were correlated with allergic responses (10). These finds suggested amino acids to be anti-allergic candidates and potential allergy biomarkers, but knowledge of the direct correlation between allergy and amino acids is limited.

Taking together, this work aims to reveal novel fecal biomarkers for allergy. The amino acid content in the feces from two cohort studies was assessed, and the involvement in allergic responses was analyzed. Finally, proline was found to be tightly correlated with allergic responses and total IgE concentration, implying it to be a potential biomarker for controlling allergy.

Materials and methods

Cohort study

Cohort study A

A total of 193 adults were recruited in this experiment. All participants were between 18 and 24 years old. The participants answered a questionnaire that addressed their physiological characteristics, healthy condition (including allergy), and typical dietary intake in the 2 weeks before feces sampling.

Cohort study B

A total of 19 adults were recruited in this experiment, including 11 non-allergic volunteers and eight allergic volunteers. All participants were between 18 and 25 years old. The non-allergic volunteers did not have any self-reported allergic diseases and did not have any significant allergy-like symptoms in the past 2 years, and the allergic volunteers were diagnosed by the hospital and would show significant allergic symptoms when in contact with particular allergens. None of the subjects had a gastric, gut, or metabolic disease, and had not taken antibiotics in the 2 months before the study. The participants answered a questionnaire that addressed their physiological characteristics, healthy condition, and typical dietary intake in the 2 weeks before feces sampling.

Sample collection

Human fresh fecal material was collected with a disposable sampling spoon into a 50 ml sterile enzyme-free centrifuge tube. Human serum samples were collected in the medical office of Zhejiang Gongshang University. After placing the whole blood in the centrifuge for 30 min at 4000 rpm, the upper serum layer was saved and placed in a 2 ml sterile enzyme-free centrifuge tube. The samples were aliquoted and stored at –80°C for subsequent experiments.

Determination of amino acid content

The concentrations of amino acids (SER, GLY, HIS, ARG, THR, ALA, PRO, TYR, VAL, MET, CYS, ILE, LEU, PHE, LYS, ASP + ASN, and GLU + GLN) in feces were determined with a Hitachi L-8900 automatic amino acid analyzer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The feces samples were dried in an oven at 60°C and crushed through an 80-mesh sieve. 100 mg sample was moved to a hydrolysis tube, and 4 ml 1:1 analytical pure hydrochloric acid (about 6 mol/L) was added. The hydrolysis tube was then blown with nitrogen for 15 min and sealed immediately. The sealed sample was heated in an oven at 110°C for 24 h to hydrolyze. Then the sample was filtrated into a 100 ml volumetric flask and diluted to 100 ml by water. 2 ml sample was put on the nitrogen-blowing instrument to dry and reconstitute in 2 ml 0.02 mol/L HCl. Then the sample was filtrated by a 0.22 μm organic filter membrane, and the amino acid content was determined.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent

IgG1, IgG2, and IgE in serum samples were measured with human immunoglobulin enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA) kits (Cat# 88-50560-22, 88-50570-22, and 88-50610-22, respectively, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) following the instructions. IgA and histamine was measured with secretory immunoglobulin A ELISA kit and histamine assay kit (Cat# H108-2 and H171, Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) following the manufacturer’s instruction. The absorbance was determined with a VersaMax microplate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, USA) at 450 nm, and the concentration was quantified based on the standard curve according to the instruction of the kits.

Metagenomic analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from fecal samples using the QIAGEN DNA Stool Mini-Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. One microgram DNA per sample was used as the input material for DNA sample preparations. Sequencing libraries were generated using NEB Next® Ultra™ DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB, Ipswich, USA) following the manufacturer’s recommendations and index codes were added to attribute sequences to each sample. Briefly, the DNA sample was fragmented by sonication to a size of 350 bp, then DNA fragments were end-polished, A-tailed, and ligated with the full-length adaptor for Illumina sequencing with further PCR amplification. At last, PCR products were purified (AMPure XP system) and libraries were analyzed for size distribution by Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and quantified using real-time PCR. The clustering of the index-coded samples was performed on a cBot Cluster Generation System according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After cluster generation, the library preparations were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq platform and paired-end reads were generated.

The shotgun reads were assembled into contigs and scaffolds using IDBA-UD (11), and then the contigs were used to predict the functional genes with MetaGeneMark (12). Finally, a non-redundant gene catalog was constructed using CD-HIT (13), and the abundances of genes were determined by aligning the reads to the gene catalog using Bowtie 2 (14).

The microbial taxonomic profile was constructed by the software MetaPhlAn2 (15). For metagenomic species analysis, the software MetaBAT (16) was applied, and the co-abundance principle and canopy clustering algorithm were performed to generate MAGs (metagenomic assembled genomes) by binning shotgun reads. After reassembling, the MAGs were assigned to a given genome when more than 80% of the subgene matched the same genome using BLASTn at a threshold of 95% identity over 90% of the gene length. If greater than 80% of the genes from a MAG had the same taxonomic level of assignment, then MGS was identified as the same microbe.

The annotated sequences were assigned to the KEGG orthologue group (KO) according to the highest score. Reporter Z-scores were calculated to reveal the differences in enriched metabolic pathways between groups, a reporter score of >2.3 (90% confidence according to the normal distribution) was used as a detection threshold to significantly differentiate between pathways (17).

Cell model

The fresh spleen isolated from healthy mice were aseptically minced by syringe coring on a 200-screen mesh cell strainer and then treated with red blood cell lysis buffer (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) to remove red blood cells. After subsequent washing by PBS, the single-cell suspension was resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, USA), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 mg/ml streptomycin (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) and counted. Then, the cells were cultured in 12-well plates (Costar, Corning Life Sciences, Tewksbury, USA) at a concentration of 5 × 106 per well (1 ml per well) at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 24 h. Then 40 mM proline was added to the cells, after further culturing for 24 h, the cells were harvested, and the gene expression was determined by qPCR. The primers sequence was listed in Supplementary Table 1.

Results and discussion

Intestinal proline correlated with allergy

To investigate the potential correlation between amino acid metabolism and allergy, we performed a cohort study with 193 volunteers (cohort study A) (Table 1). The feces amino acid content was quantified by HPLC, and the main allergy-related indexes were quantified by ELISA. Pearson correlation analysis showed a significant negative correlation between proline and IgE was revealed (r = –0.151, p = 0.038), whereas, no significant correlation between proline and IgG1, IgG2, and IgA, or between other amino acids and immunoglobins, was obtained (Supplementary Table 2). This result indicated a specific relationship between intestinal proline and IgE-mediated allergy.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Demographics of the volunteers.

We further recruited 11 non-allergic volunteers and 8 allergic volunteers in another cohort study (cohort study B) (Table 1). Serum IgE and histamine levels confirmed the significant difference between the two groups (Figures 1A,B). The feces proline was significantly lower in the allergic group, confirming that intestinal proline concentration is negatively correlated with allergy (Figure 1C). Moreover, the proline intake was estimated by dietary information (Figure 1D) and the microbiota diversity and metabolism (Supplementary Figures 1A,B and Figures 1E,F) were assessed by metagenomic sequencing, but none showed a significant difference between allergic and non-allergic groups, and only limited strains showed significantly different abundance between the two groups (Supplementary Figure 1C). Although these results cannot rule out that different dietary habits or microbiota metabolism could regulate intestinal proline, it implied that the body proline metabolism might be different between allergic and non-allergic individuals.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Intestinal proline correlated with allergy. The concentration of serum IgE (A), serum histamine (B), feces proline (C), and daily diet proline intake (D) of the volunteers in cohort study B were determined. And the abundance of the arginine, ornithine and proline interconversion pathway (E) and the abundance of the L-proline biosynthesis II (from arginine) pathway (F) were measured based on functional KO annotation of the metagenome. Data were presented as mean ± SEM. The statistical differences were calculated by Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001; ns, not significant.

Proline down-regulates IgE concentration

To understand how proline regulates allergic responses, a cell culture model was established by using spleen cells from healthy mice. As shown in Figure 2A, the transcription of Th2 cytokines IL-4 and IL-13 were significantly down-regulated after proline treatment, while the transcription of Treg cytokines IL-10 and TGF-β was up-regulated. Noticeably, the mRNA transcription of other proteins, including those mainly expressed by Th1 (INF-γ and T-bet), Th17 (IL-17A and ROR-γt), and DC (IL-6, IL-12A, and OX40L), were not changed, and the crucial transcription factors of Th2 (GATA-3) and Treg (Foxp3) was also unchanged. This result implied that proline specifically targeted Th2 and Treg activity. Based on this, whether the administration of proline will regulate these cells and then alleviate allergic responses was an interesting problem to be further investigated.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Proline down-regulates IgE concentration. (A) Mice spleen cells were treated by proline and the mRNA transcription of allergy-related proteins was determined by qPCR. (B) The concentration of feces proline and serum IgE of each individual in the cohort study. Data were presented as mean ± SEM. The statistical differences were calculated by Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ns, not significant.

Finally, we analyzed the concentration of proline and IgE in each individual in cohort study A. Interestingly, for those individuals with a higher concentration of proline (>1.5 mM), their serum IgE levels were all lower than 100 ng/ml (Figure 2B), which could be regarded as total IgE negative (18). Furthermore, the result also revealed that people with high-IgE-mediated allergy had decreased odds of high intestinal proline (Table 2). Based on this, feces proline was a promising marker for allergy diagnosis, especially for large-scale screening, which can rapidly exclude a large proportion of IgE-negative individuals.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Odds ratio analysis of high-IgE based on feces proline concentration.

In conclusion, our study revealed a tight correlation between gut proline and serum IgE, indicating proline as a promising biomarker for IgE-mediated allergy. Proline suppresses Th2 cells and activates Tregs, therefore is a potential therapeutic approach to allergic diseases. Although the detailed underlying mechanisms required further elucidation, this work is a pilot study that provided intestinal proline as a promising subject for further allergy investigations.

Data availability statement

The data presented in the study are deposited in the NCBI repository, accession number PRJNA902178.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Zhejiang Gongshang University Ethics Review Committee. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

LF, YL, YiZ, and YW designed the research. CW, YoZ, JZ, and HX analyzed the data. JM, FW, and ZG performed the research. JM and CW wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 31871735), the National Key R&D Program of China (grant number 2019YFC1605003), and the Zhejiang Provincial Science and Technology Foundation of China (grant number 2019C02069).

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to all the students who voluntarily participated in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2022.1036536/full#supplementary-material

References

1. WAO. White Book on Allergy. Milwaukee, IA: WAO (2013).

Google Scholar

2. Fu L, Wang C, Zhu Y, Wang Y. Seafood allergy: occurrence, mechanisms and measures. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2019) 88:80–92.

Google Scholar

3. Sampath V, Sindher SB, Pinzon AMA, Nadeau KC. Can food allergy be cured? What are the future prospects? Allergy. (2020) 75:1316–26. doi: 10.1111/all.14116

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Sabouraud M, Bierme P, Andre-Gomez S-A, Villard-Truc F, Correard A-K, Garnier L, et al. Oral immunotherapy in food allergies: a practical update for pediatricians. Arch Pediatr. (2021) 28:319–24. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2021.03.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Ansotegui IJ, Melioli G, Canonica GW, Caraballo L, Villa E, Ebisawa M, et al. IgE allergy diagnostics and other relevant tests in allergy, a World Allergy Organization position paper. World Allergy Organ J. (2020) 13:100080. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2019.100080

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Na HJ, Hamilton RG, Klion AD, Bochner BS. Biomarkers of eosinophil involvement in allergic and eosinophilic diseases: review of phenotypic and serum markers including a novel assay to quantify levels of soluble siglec-8. J Immunol Methods. (2012) 383:39–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2012.05.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Vashisht P, Casale T. Omalizumab for treatment of allergic rhinitis. Expert Opin Biol Ther. (2013) 13:933–45. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2013.795943

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. James C, Bernstein DI. Allergen immunotherapy: an updated review of safety. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. (2017) 17:55–9. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000335

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Tome D. Amino acid metabolism and signalling pathways: potential targets in the control of infection and immunity. Eur J Clin Nutr. (2021) 75:1319–27. doi: 10.1038/s41430-021-00943-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Fu L, Fu S, Wang C, Xie M, Wang Y. Yogurt-sourced probiotic bacteria alleviate shrimp tropomyosin-induced allergic mucosal disorders, potentially through microbiota and metabolism modifications. Allergol Int. (2019) 68:506–14. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2019.05.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Peng Y, Leung HCM, Yiu SM, Chin FYL. IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics. (2012) 28:1420–8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts174

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Zhu W, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. Ab initio gene identification in metagenomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. (2010) 38:e132.

Google Scholar

13. Li W, Godzik A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. (2006) 22:1658–9.

Google Scholar

14. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. (2009) 10:R25. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Truong DT, Franzosa EA, Tickle TL, Scholz M, Weingart G, Pasolli E, et al. MetaPhlAn2 for enhanced metagenomic taxonomic profiling. Nat Methods. (2015) 12:902–3. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3589

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Kang DD, Froula J, Egan R, Wang Z. MetaBAT, an efficient tool for accurately reconstructing single genomes from complex microbial communities. PeerJ. (2015) 3:e1165. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1165

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Qin N, Yang F, Li A, Prifti E, Chen Y, Shao L, et al. Alterations of the human gut microbiome in liver cirrhosis. Nature. (2014) 513:59–64.

Google Scholar

18. Al-Mughales JA. Diagnostic utility of total IgE in foods, inhalant, and multiple allergies in Saudi Arabia. J Immunol Res. (2016) 2016:1058632. doi: 10.1155/2016/1058632

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: proline, allergy, biomarker, IgE, cohort study

Citation: Ma J, Wang C, Wang F, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Zhang J, Gao Z, Zhang Y, Xie H, Wang Y and Fu L (2022) Intestinal proline is a potential anti-allergy factor for allergy diagnosis and therapy. Front. Nutr. 9:1036536. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1036536

Received: 04 September 2022; Accepted: 07 November 2022;
Published: 30 November 2022.

Edited by:

Ebenezer Satyaraj, Nestle Purina PetCare Company, United States

Reviewed by:

Lijun Chen, Beijing Sanyuan Foods Co. Ltd., Beijing, China
Suman Kapila, National Dairy Research Institute (ICAR), India

Copyright © 2022 Ma, Wang, Wang, Zhang, Liu, Zhang, Gao, Zhang, Xie, Wang and Fu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Linglin Fu, fulinglin@mail.zjgsu.edu.cn

Download