Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Med., 02 February 2023
Sec. Infectious Diseases: Pathogenesis and Therapy
Volume 10 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1088507

Trichinella infections in animals and humans of Iran and Turkey

  • 1State Key Laboratory for Zoonotic Diseases, Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Research, Ministry of Education, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, China
  • 2Department of Parasite Vaccine Research and Production, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Karaj, Iran
  • 3Research Center for Hydatid Disease in Iran, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
  • 4Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Firat, Elaziğ, Türkiye
  • 5Department of Biosciences, COMSATS University Islamabad (CUI), Islamabad, Pakistan

Trichinellosis is considered as a cosmopolitan zoonosis caused by different species of the small nematodes of the genus Trichinella. The present study aimed to provide a broad review for exploring Trichinella sp. infection in humans and animals of Iran and Turkey. Additionally, we aimed to explore bases for trichinellosis prevention and control. Two reports of human trichinellosis following the consumption of meat of wild boar are available in the northern Iran. A large outbreak of trichinellosis and some other sporadic cases are reported mainly as a result of eating wild boar or pork meat from Turkey, where T. britovi is present. Field studies show that Trichinella sp. infections occur in wild carnivores of Iran, particularly the golden jackal (Canis aureus) as the most frequently infected species. T. britovi has been reported to be present elsewhere in Iran in wild mammals, where wild boar is the main source of Trichinella sp. infection. In Turkey, Trichinella spp. has been reported from animals including both domesticated and wild pigs and gray wolf (Canis lupus). However, current data on the distribution of Trichinella taxa are fragmentary in the Anatolian region.

Introduction

Trichinellosis (formerly trichinosis) is a zoonotic disease caused by the consumption of meat and meat derived products infected by nematode larvae of the genus Trichinella. This disease represents an important health burden for humans (1). The control of disease in domesticates susceptible animals (e.g., pigs and horses) and game (mainly mammals) implies further economic burdens (2). Carnivores and domesticated and wild swine are the most important natural reservoir hosts of these nematodes (3).

From the 19th century onward, the sylvatic cycle of Trichinella spp. has been documented in all the continents with the exception of Antarctica (4). In the last 20 years, epidemiological data of Trichinella spp. infections in animals/and or human are reported from 95 (48.5%) countries worldwide including the wild cycle (in 75 countries; 38.3%), the domestic cycle (in 32 countries; 16.3%), and human infections (in 47 countries; 23.9%). However, epidemiological information is still lacking in many of countries or dates back to the last century (4).

An overall annual trichinellosis incidence rate of 469.2–985.3 cases per billion persons per year, and a global mortality rate of 0.3 to 0.8 per billion persons per year, have been estimate for trichinellosis with a global disability-adjusted life years (DALY) of 523 in 2010 (5). Most Trichinella sp. infections occur in the wildlife, the spillover of these parasites from wildlife to domesticated animals represents a challenge for disease control in endemic areas. There were rare reports of human trichinellosis in Iran and Turkey. Trichinella sp. has been reported from wild life (carnivores and wild boars) of the Caspian region, Isfahan, Ardabil, Khuzestan, Khorasan Razavi, and Bandar Abbas in the north, central, northwest, southwest, north-east and of south of Iran. T. britovi is circulated among wild life of Iran (69). A large outbreak of trichinellosis and some other sporadic cases are recorded from Turkey, where T. britovi was identified in meat balls and human biopsies as well as gray wolf (10, 11). Trichinella infection had previously been documented in both domestic and wild pigs (12). The two neighboring countries of Turkey, and Iran have historically shared socioeconomic, linguistic, and ethnic traits.

The aim of this review was to describe the epidemiological picture of Trichinella spp. infections in animals and humans of Iran and Turkey (Figure 1). In-depth understanding of the epidemiology of trichinellosis can be valuable for developing control programs in a cost-effective way in order to reduce this transmission of the parasite.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Geographical districts of Iran and Turkey.

Human trichinellosis in Iran

Since the vast majority of the population of Iran and Turkey are Muslim, pig farming and consuming pork meat is rare in Muslims countries because of Islamic law. A human infection has been reported in 1966 in the northern Iran based on the clinical symptoms, seropositivity and a history of wild boar meat consumption (13). Almost, half a century later, an outbreak was documented by serology in two household members of a Tehrani family following the consumption of meat of a wild boar hunted in the Javaher–Dasht forest of Siahkal, Gilan province in 2007 (14). Human trichinellosis has not yet been identified in Iran; however, based on the sylvatic cycle, it is likely that T. britovi could be the causative agent of the human infection in the region (6, 15).

In Mazandaran province, anti-Trichinella IgG were reported in eight males out of the 364 at high-risk persons (2.2%; CI 95%, 1.9–2.4) who had consumed wild boar meat at least once in a year. The seropositivity was linked to occupation (hunters; OR, 13.5; 95% CI, 3.1–59.4) and frequency of wild boar meat consumption (more than 7 times; OR, 17.5; 95% CI, 3.2–93.6), indicating great exposer of male hunters and their friends and relatives to infected meat. Seropositivity was found to increase by age and to peak in 41–60-year-olds, but not at a significant level (16).

A study detected anti-Trichinella IgG by ELISA in five (2.6%) out of 189 persons suspected to be wild boar meat consumers of the Golestan Province, northern Iran (17). Serum samples of 24 persons of Bojnord, the capital city of northern Khorasan, tested negative for anti-Trichinella IgG by ELISA, while a serum sample of a person of 16 tested of Behshahr, a town of the Mazandaran province, tested positive (17). Three out of five seropositive persons were ≥50 year old and four out of five were males (17).

Trichinella spp. infection in animals of Iran

Until the 1990s, Trichinella spiralis was considered the only species in the genus and only in the last 30 years the multispecies concept has been affirmed (4). It follows that T. spiralis has been reported in animals from all continents in the past (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. The region of the detection of Trichinella infected human and animals (for more details, please refer to the main text).

Wild swine

As shown in Table 1, there are epidemiological studies on Trichinella sp. using different techniques. In Iran, this species was reported in two out of 4,950 carcasses of wild boar hunted in Mazandaran and Guilan provinces from 1961 to 1967 (18). Mobedi et al. (19) reported a low prevalence in wild boar (0.02%) and brown bears (6.25%) of the Caspian region hunted from 1967 to 1971. In 1978, Trichinella sp. larvae have been collected from wild boar (25.0%) and brown bears (6.2%) (20).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Epidemiological investigations on Trichinella sp. in human and animals of Iran.

In 2006, Trichinella sp. larvae were found in two of 60 wild boars of the Khuzestan province (20).

Trichinella sp. larvae collected from a wild boar of the Gilan province (northern Iran), were erroneously identified as belonging to the Trichinella murrelli, a species of North America (21). Subsequently, a more in-depth molecular study showed that the larvae belonged to T. britovi (22).

No Trichinella sp. larvae were detected in 26 wild boars of Khorasan Razavi Province (northeast of Iran) by artificial digestion (6).

Trichinella britovi larvae were detected in two (5.7%) of the 35 wild boars in Amol County from 2015 to 2016 (15) and in three (3.7%) of 79 wild boars of Mazandaran Province, northern Iran during 2014–2015 (16). The five animals harbored from 0.05 to 9 larvae per g of muscle tissue [Rostami et al. (15, 16)].

Carnivores (jackal, fox, wolf, dog, felids, mongooses, badger)

As summarized in Table 1, different studies have reported Trichinella spp. in carnivores. In 1972, Trichinella sp. larvae were detected in 38 (60.3%) of 63 golden jackals (Canis aureus) and two of three jungle cats (Felis chaus) of the Nour forest near Amol and Hashtpar, Caspian region, northern Iran (23). In 1973, Trichinella sp. larvae have been detected in two stray dogs, ten jackals, two red foxes (Vulpes vulpes), and one hyena (Hyaena hyaena) of Isfahan by Sadighian et al. (23). In 1967 and 1976, Trichinella sp. larvae was detected by trichinoscopy and artificial digestion of muscles in 8 (50%) out of 16 golden jackals and in 3 (30%) out of 10 red foxes collected in the eastern part of the Caspian region and northeastern Iran including Gilan, Mazandaran, Golestan, North Khorasan and Khorasan Razavi provinces (24). From 1967 to 1971, a study in the Caspian region, did not detect any Trichinella sp. larva in badger (Meles meles) (19).

Using trichinoscopy, Hamidi and Mobedi (25) detected Trichinella sp. larvae, identified as T. spiralis at that time, in 4 out of 17 red foxes, 4 out of 12 stray dogs and in three golden jackals of the Bandar Abbas region, Hormozgan Province, southern Iran.

In 1978, Trichinella sp. larvae have been detected in 55.7% of golden jackals (55.7%), red foxes (8.3%), hyenas (2 of 2), and stray dogs (4.2%) (26). In 1987, Trichinella sp. larvae from golden jackals of the Caspian Sea and Khuzestan regions, southwest of the country were identified at the species level as T. spiralis and Trichinella nelsoni (27), today T. britovi (28) by cross-breeding experiments in laboratory mice (29). The Khuzestan isolate (formerly T. nelsoni) showed a low infectivity to albino rats, whereas the Caspian isolate was found to be highly infective for albino rats and wild pigs (27) suggesting that it was a true T. spiralis isolate. In 2000, Trichinella sp. larvae (T. spiralis at that time) were detected in one (1.4%) of 75 stray dogs of Isfahan (30).

In 2000, Trichinella sp. larvae were detected in three of ten mongooses (Herpestes auropunctatus), of the Khuzestan province, southwest Iran. These Trichinella sp. larvae (named T. nelsoni at that time) showed a higher larval burden in laboratory mice than in laboratory rats, suggesting to be T. britovi (31). In 2006 in the same province, Trichinella sp. larvae were detected in two out of ten mongooses and in a wild cat (20).

Mowlavi et al. (9) identified T. britovi in a leopard (Panthera pardus saxicolor) hunted in Germi County, Ardabil Province, north-western Iran.

A study by Borji et al. (6) documented by artificial digestion, Trichinella sp. larvae, identified as T. britovi by multiplex PCR, in three (2.5%) of 120 stray dogs of Khorasan Razavi Province, north-east Iran.

During the period 2009–2010, Mirjalali et al. (7) investigated muscle samples of 14 stray dogs and 18 golden jackals of the Khuzestan Province, south-west Iran, where T. britovi had been detected 30 years earlier. The circulation of T. britovi was confirmed in two golden jackals [Mirjalali et al. (7)]. Punctiform deletions or substitutions in the 5S and ITS2 sequences were detected in these two T. britovi isolates (22).

Shamsian et al. (8) investigated 295 stray dogs, 12 golden jackals, one red fox and one wild boar of the Khorasan Razavi Province, north-eastern Iran, in the period 2016–2017. T. britovi larvae were detected in 5 (1.7%) stray dogs from Mashhad city and in one (8.3%) golden jackal from the surroundings of Sabzevar city.

Insectivores, rodents and mall mole-like mammals

From 1967 to 1971, a study in the Caspian region, did not detect any Trichinella spp. larvae in rodents (house mouse, Mus musculus; wood mouse, Apodemus sylvaticus; black rat, Rattus rattus and shrews (Crocidura sp.) (19). An old study reported the presence of T. spiralis in a Persian jird (Meriones persicus) of Isfahan in central part of Iran (23).

From 1967 to 1976, no Trichinella spp. larvae were detected by trichinoscopy, and artificial digestion, in different small mammals including 13 hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus), 13 shrews (Crocidura lucodon); 28 lagomorpha: 7 hares (Lepus capensis) and 21 pika (Ochotona rufescens); and 746 rodents: 56 asiatica jerboas (Allactaga elater), 4 dormice (Gils glis), 160 house mice (M. musculus), 206 wood mice (A. sylvaticus), 10 Indian scaly tailed murine rats (Nesokia indica), 7 rats (Rattus ratoides), 108 hamsters (Cricetulus migratorius and Calomyscus balewadi), 69 voles (Microtus transcapicus, M. Socialis, M. arvalis, and M. nivalis) and 126 gerbils (Meriones persicus, M. Crassus, and Rhombomys opimus) collected from Gilan, Mazandaran, Golestan, North Khorasan and Khorasan Razavi provinces, where Trichinella sp. larvae had been detected in golden jackals and red foxes (24). A study by Hamidi and Mobedi (25) investigated 204 rodents using trichinoscopy and artificial digestion from the Bandar Abbas area of Hormozgan province, southern Iran, but no Trichinella spp. larvae were found.

Borji et al. (6) in Khorasan Razavi province, where T. britovi has been detected in stray dogs, no Trichinella sp. larvae were found in 25 rodents (species unknown).

Human trichinellosis in Turkey

In Turkey, pork intake is uncommon, as most of population are Muslim, and consequently, trichinellosis is thought to be extremely rare. The epidemiological studies and detected regions of human trichinellosis in Turkey have been summarized in Table 2 and Figure 2.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Investigations on Trichinella sp. in human and animals of Turkey.

In 1977, an outbreak of 13 human trichinellosis cases was documented in Kumkapi (Istanbul) following the consumption of pork (32). At that time, the etiological agent was considered to be T. spiralis. In 2003, an outbreak (7 infected persons) due to the consumption of wild boar meat occurred in Bursa (33).

Between December 2003 and January 2004, a large outbreak of trichinellosis (418 infected persons) occurred in Izmir, Western Anatolia. Raw minced meat balls illegally made with both beef and pork were the source of the outbreak. This food traditionally made with uncooked veal and named cig kofte, was very popular in Izmir. Infected raw balls were made by a wholesale meat butcher and consumed in 14 restaurants and street vendors. Trichinella sp. larvae collected from these meat balls and human biopsies were identified as T. britovi [Akkoc et al. (11)]. Information on this outbreak is also available in other papers [Ozdemir et al. (34); Turk et al. (35)], which investigated smaller groups of patients all included in the Akkoc et al. (11) study.

In 1997, Trichinella sp. larvae, considered to belong to T. spiralis, were detected in a wild boar sausage of Bulgarian immigrants in Istanbul (36).

Trichinella sp. infections in animals of Turkey

Wild boar and pigs

Wild boar is widespread across the country, however, there is no accurate estimate of their population. This game is shot by hunters, ethnic groups, or farmers for meat, and/or crop protection (37). Trichinellosis had been documented in both domesticated and wild pigs (12). From 1971 to 2011, the prevalence of Trichinella sp. in wild boar and domesticated pigs was investigated by six studies carried out in Istanbul, Aegean Region, Aydin, and Bursa (Table 2).

In 1971, one wild boar out of 70 tested positive in Ankara for Trichinella sp. larvae by trichinoscopy and artificial digestion (38). Muscle samples of 535 pigs and 1,165 wild boars were tested in Istanbul between 1973 and 1984. Two wild boars tested positive by trichinoscopy and artificial digestion (12). In 1991, 45 wild boars were examined in Aegean Region by trichinoscopy (39). In 2009, muscle samples of 43 wild boars of the Aydin province were tested by trichinoscopy, but no larvae were detected (40).

In the Bursa province, 27 wild boars were necropsied to investigate the helminth fauna including Trichinella sp. larvae using trichinoscopy and artificial digestion. All muscle samples tested negative (37).

Carnivore mammals and birds

Trichinella sp. larvae collected from muscle samples of a gray wolf (Canis lupus) of Çankiri, were identified at the species level as T. britovi (10).

In 2021, muscle samples of from 59 different wild birds including: the common buzzard (Buteo buteo), house sparrow (Passer domesticus), yellow-legged gull (Larus michahellis), white stork (Ciconia ciconia), common magpie (Pica pica), barn owl (Tyto alba), Jackdaw (Corvus monedula), common swift (Apus apus), common kestrel (Falco tinnunculus), Eleonora’s falcon (Falco eleonorae), short-toed snake eagle (Circaetus gallicus), alpine swift (Apus melba), Eurasian hoopoe (Upupa epops), carrion crow (Corvus corone), European nightjar (Caprimulgus europaeus), common pigeon (Columba livia), tree pipit (Anthus trivialis) and hooded crow (Corvus cornix) of the Bursa province were tested for Trichinella sp. larvae by trichinoscopy and artificial digestion. No Trichinella sp. larvae were detected (39). The detected regions of animal trichinellosis in Turkey have been summarized in Figure 2.

Epidemiological factors of trichinellosis in Iran and Turkey

It is worth noting that the decrease in backyard and free-range pig farming, the systematic regulation of abattoir facilities, and the exponential increase in pigs reared in controlled situations are among the reasons for the significant reduction of trichinellosis in industrialized countries (41). Despite the reduction of the domestic cycle of Trichinella sp., trichinellosis can still be considered as a potential risk, due to the presence of these nematodes in the wildlife, which can be a spillover for domesticated susceptible animals (4).

The low seropositivity rate or near absence of human cases in Iran is mainly due to the religious ban, which prohibits the consumption of meat from domesticated and wild swine. The wild boar is the source of Trichinella sp. infection for religious minorities in Iran practicing wild boar hunting (16, 42, 43).

Raw meatballs made from minced meat, wheat, tomato paste and spicy spices is traditionally made with venison or beef, while its replacement with infected pork has led to a trichinellosis outbreak in Izmir. Such outbreaks indicate that pork or wild boar meat consumption in areas without control may lead to serious health and economic problems, even when religion limits consumption (44). Thus, the presence of trichinellosis in Muslim societies, as occurred in Turkey, reveals that these societies are also at risk of trichinellosis.

Trichinella britovi was confirmed to be causative agent of infection in Turkey (11, 34). T. britovi is mostly a sylvatic species, although it can infect humans when farmers fail to properly rear domestic pigs, allowing them to come into touch with animals. A hunted wild boar or a free-range or backyard pig could be the source of infection (11). These outbreaks highlight the importance of testing swine for Trichinella infection at the slaughterhouse to ensure safe food for consumers, particularly when raw meat is consumed. Educational strategies such as health communication campaign for consumers, farmers, hunters and other groups can be of great importance. In these outbreaks, early detection, notification of health authorities, and identification of affected meat had led to the control of infection (35).

The most key routes of transmission of Trichinella taxa are predation and scavenging behavior. At present, only T. britovi has been detected in wild animals of Iran and Turkey. More sampling is needed to reveal the spread of this species in these two countries of Western Asia. In Iran, current data indicates the golden jackal as an indicator animal for the circulation of T. britovi because of its scavenging behavior and adaptability to various habitats, including the peri-domestic habitats (8, 45, 46).

Trichinellosis prevention and control in human and animals

Regarding the lack of pig farming and the rare human cases, only public and professional education, and preventing illegal wildlife hunting can be recommended for prevention and control of disease in the region.

Health communication and One Health approach (OH)

As mentioned high risk behavior (i.e., hunter-based life styles and recreational hunting leaving animal carcasses in filed, discarding game carcasses together with household garbage) can favor Trichinella sp. transmission in the wild (4). Educational plans (such as Health communication campaign) are in need of the commitment, coordinated actions under OH approaches to increase awareness of consumers, farmers and hunters, and compliance regarding trichinellosis especially in rural communities and remote areas (e.g., high-risk regions), where comprehensive data are needed on the circulation of Trichinella sp. in wildlife. The One Health triad is made up of humans, domestic animals, wildlife and the changing ecosystems. Human activities affect the flow of all parasitic infections in the One Health triad, and the impact of the resulting spillover events (e.g., spillover from wildlife to humans) are considered (47).

The importance of the One Health approach in the control of infectious diseases should be well embraced by the relevant authorities for providing public education on zoonotic diseases using media, radio, television, newspapers (48) science exhibitions, media production and other tools, where crucial changes of care policy and educational system will be needed to increase the knowledge of the public, particularly in the low- and middle-income settings (49).

It has been indicated that communication campaigns over longer time periods can be capable of changing health behaviors and increasing awareness of public regarding pork-borne parasitic diseases and schistosomiasis control measures (5053).

The Iranian Parasitology Museum (IPM) provided an opportunity to explore practice in science communication among the general public and school children, while museum collections are freely available for translation of investigations by communications practitioners. The IPM is being answered questions about animal and human parasites (e.g., zoonotic parasites) and their life cycle, and infection consequences of parasites, as well as those regarding the controls required (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. The role of the Iranian Parasitology Museum in science communication for the public and students. The figures were prepared from the archives of the Iranian Parasitology Museum.

The success of preventive measures requires appropriate communication approach (such as supportive dialogue and participation) and proper interaction with policy makers under effective synergistic collaboration (interdisciplinary and interinstitutional cooperation) in the domain of OH approach. Establishment of an OH commission and/or OH joint steering committee at national level (54) can be capable of solving challenges and friction and facilitating relevant programs.

Preventing illegal wildlife hunting and trade

Preventing illegal hunting of wildlife is also one of the ways to limit the spread of Trichinella sp. infection. Ecological consequences and public health zoonotic disease emergence from hunting waste, consumption, and use of wildlife are regarded as consequences of illegal wildlife hunting and trade.

Illegal wildlife trade (IWT) originates from lower levels of communities (e.g., poachers, local market sellers, and local consumers) especially in underdeveloped countries due to factors such as low socioeconomic status (e.g., low income, poverty and lower education), (55, 56).

The risk of zoonotic diseases spillover is associated with drivers such as land-use change (LUC), human culture and habits including hunting behavior, illegal wildlife hunting and trade for trophies and bushmeat), agriculture expansion, infrastructure development, urbanization and food industry change, as well as introduction of exotic species (5761).

Despite existing regulations regarding the wildlife hunting or trade, policies restricting illicit activities would not be fully effective in many areas of the world, bringing greater public health concerns because of lacking monitoring of wildlife status and their products, indicating a serious “OH” issue.

Illegal importation of meat and its products have been related to trichinellosis in some European countries (55, 62, 63).

Although wildlife trade is prohibited in Iran (64), implementing effective enforcement of law against it is often difficult due to needs of manpower and major financial resources (65).

A number of mitigation actions and policies including enforcement of regulation at local, national and international settings (further monitoring of local restaurants and eateries by assessing the type of meat, continuous inspection of wildlife trade markets, increasing surveillance at ports and airports, etc.), and awareness-raising (Health communication) are among strict measures under the control of the sanitary authorities for combating such illegal activities and prevention of infectious disease transmission (55), Although hunting waste can also provide potential sources of infection for wild boars and other wildlife, this cannot be considerable in Iran and Turkey due to the religious restrictions. Of course, proper disposal of dead animals is also necessary for avoiding scavenging.

The wild boars are important sources of infection for a limited portion of human population in Iran and turkey including religious minorities consuming pork meat, and indigenous hunters involving in illegal hunting (16, 43).

Concluding remarks

Though there are rare records of human infections caused by Trichinella sp. nematodes in Iran to date, the possibility of human infection exists among old male hunters (16, 42). High risk behavior such as hunter-based life styles, and recreational hunting can be the cause of trichinellosis (66). The transfer of infected meat from one region or even country to another can also contribute to local outbreaks (67).

Regarding population growth of wild boar in the recent years in Iran, they are considered as potential source for zoonotic diseases such Trichinella infection among high-risk individuals (43).

Possible consumption of wild boar meat after hunting by Iranian Armenians, and Zoroastrians (16, 20, 42), suggests a significant potential threat of trichinellosis; thus, health communication (i.e., educational plans) for hunters, farmers and consumers especially among populations living in remote areas can be fruitful in reducing or eliminating risk of exposure to these potential sources of Trichinella, especially in high-risk areas, where most people were unaware of the association of wild boar meat consumption and trichinellosis. Although hunting waste can also provide potential sources of infection for wild boars and other wildlife, this cannot be considerable in Iran due religious restrictions. Of course, disposal of dead animals is also necessary for avoiding scavenging.

The low seropositivity rate or near absence of human cases in Iran is mainly due to Muslim beliefs based on not consuming wild boar meat or pork meet, although lack of further studies may be involved in such results to some extent.

Previously most Iranian published papers had reported Trichinella larvae from wild animal isolates as T. spiralis, because the multiple species concept was in dispute at the time (29), when three new species were proposed in 1972 based on biological features including T. nativa and T. nelsoni (68) and T. pseudospiralis (69).

More structured field surveys are required to elucidate the natural host distribution of Trichinella taxa in sylvatic carnivore of Iran.

Overall, Trichinella sp. has been reported from wild life of the Caspian region, Isfahan, Ardabil, Khuzestan, Khorasan Razavi, and Bandar Abbas in the north, central, northwest, southwest, north-east and of south of Iran. Current data on the distribution of Trichinella taxa is fragmentary. Moreover, most of available data comes from case reports and biological data of the Trichinella taxa in wild animals of Iran is very limited, while no data are available on the distribution of Trichinella taxa in many parts of Iran; thus, more epidemiological studies with larva identification at the species level by molecular tests are still needed for covering the whole country to ascertain the prevalence of Trichinella sp. infection, mode of transmission, and population structure in wild animals of Iran. Experimental studies are needed to elucidate the infectivity and predilection sites of T, britovi genotypes circulating in Iran. In Turkey, only a few studies on T. britovi infection have been published since no data have been reported on human trichinellosis after 2004 and wild boars after 2011. We believe that Trichinella spp. present in wildlife should be explored further, as this would greatly aid our understanding of epidemiology and to implement control strategies.

Author contributions

MB, ML, SF, and MFH conceived the study and designed the study. MB, ML, and SF performed the search of the literature. SS, HA, MB, XW, and MFH contributed in data collection. All authors wrote the manuscript and read and approved the submitted version.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the people who has investigated Trichinellosis in Turkey and Iran. They remarkably improved our understanding of the epidemiology of Trichinellosis. This study was conducted in collaboration with the State Key Laboratory for Zoonotic Diseases, Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Research, Ministry of Education, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Murrell K, Pozio E. Worldwide occurrence and impact of human trichinellosis, 1986-2009. Emerg Infect Dis. (2011) 17:2194–202. doi: 10.3201/eid1712.110896

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Murrell K. Zoonotic foodborne parasites and their surveillance. OIE Rev Sci Technol. (2013) 32:559–69. doi: 10.20506/rst.32.2.2239

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Pozio E, Murrell K. Systematics and epidemiology of Trichinella. Adv Parasitol. (2006) 63:367–439. doi: 10.1016/S0065-308X(06)63005-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Pozio E. Epidemiology. In: Bruschi F, editor. Trichinella and Trichinellosis. London: Academic Press (2021). doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-821209-7.00005-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Devleesschauwer B, Praet N, Speybroeck N, Torgerson P, Haagsma J, De Smet K, et al. The low global burden of trichinellosis: evidence and implications. Int J Parasitol. (2015) 45:95–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.05.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Borji H, Sadeghi H, Razmi G, Pozio E, la Rosa G. Trichinella infection in wildlife of Northeast of Iran. Iran J Parasitol. (2012) 7:57–61.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

7. Mirjalali H, Rezaei S, Pozio E, Naddaf S, Salahi-Moghaddam A, Kia E, et al. Trichinella britovi in the jackal Canis aureus from South-West Iran. J Helminthol. (2014) 88:385–8. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X1300028X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Shamsian A, Pozio E, Fata A, Navi Z, Moghaddas E. The golden jackal (Canis aureus) as an indicator animal for Trichinella britovi in Iran. Parasite. (2018) 25:28. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2018030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Mowlavi G, Marucci G, Mobedi I, Zahabiioon F, Mirjalali H, Pozio E. Trichinella britovi in a leopard (Panthera pardus saxicolor) in Iran. Vet Parasitol. (2009) 164:350–2. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.05.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Erol U, Danyer E, Sarimehmetoglu H, Utuk A. First parasitological data on a wild grey wolf in Turkey with morphological and molecular confirmation of the parasites. Acta Parasitol. (2021) 66:687–92. doi: 10.1007/s11686-020-00311-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Akkoc N, Kuruuzum Z, Akar S, Yuce A, Onen F, Yapar N, et al. A large-scale outbreak of trichinellosis caused by Trichinella britovi in Turkey. Zoonoses Public Health. (2009) 56:65–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01158.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Nazli B, Inal T. The occurrence of Trichinella spiralis in domestic and wild pigs and in prepared pork products in Turkey. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. (1987) 100:187–90.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

13. Moein M. First report of human trichinosis in Iran. J Med Univ Med Sch. (1966) 5:259–67.

Google Scholar

14. Kia E, Meamar AR, Zahabiun F, Soodbaksh A, Kordbacheh P. An outbreak of human trichinellosis due to consumption of boar meat infected with Trichinella sp. Iran J Infect Dis. (2008) 41:35–48.

Google Scholar

15. Rostami A, Khazan H, Kazemi B, Kia E, Bandepour M, Taghipour N, et al. Prevalence of Trichinella spp. Infections in hunted wild boars in Northern Iran. Iran J Public Health. (2017) 46:1712–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

16. Rostami A, Khazan H, Kia E, Bandehpour M, Mowlavi G, Kazemi B, et al. Molecular identification of Trichinella spp. in wild boar, and serological survey of high-risk populations in Iran. Food Control. (2018) 90:40–7. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.02.016

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Koohsar F, Naddaf S, Rokni M, Mirjalali H, Mohebali M, Shafiei R, et al. Serological detection of trichinellosis among suspected wild boar meat consumers in North and Northeast of Iran. Iran J Parasitol. (2021) 16:253–60. doi: 10.18502/ijpa.v16i2.6323

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Afshar A, Jahfarzadeh Z. Trichinosis in Iran. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. (1967) 61:349–51. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1967.11686497

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Mobedi I, Arfaa F, Madadi H, Movafagh K. Sylvatic focus of trichiniasis in the Caspian region, Northern Iran. Am J Trop Med Hyg. (1973) 22:720–2. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1973.22.720

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Mahdavi M. Trichinellosis in Iran. Iran J Public Health. (2009) 38:131–3.

Google Scholar

21. Kia E, Meamar A, Zahabiun F, Mirhendi H. The first occurrence of Trichinella murrelli in wild boar in Iran and a review of Iranian trichinellosis. J Helminthol. (2009) 83:399–402. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X09990319

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Marucci G, La Rosa G, Pozio E. Incorrect sequencing and taxon misidentification: an example in the Trichinella genus. J Helminthol. (2010) 84:336–9. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X10000131

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Sadighian A, Arfaa F, Movafagh K. Trichinella spiralis in carnivores and rodents in Isfahan, Iran. J Parasitol. (1973) 59:986.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

24. Mobedi I, Hamidi A. Sylvatic focus of trichiniasis in North Estern Iran. Iran J Public Health. (1976) 5:188–93.

Google Scholar

25. Hamidi A, Mobedi I. Sylvatic focus of trichiniasis in Bandar Abbas area South of Iran. Iran J Public Health. (1977) 6:30–3.

Google Scholar

26. Massoud J, Kim C, Pawlowski Z. Trichinellosis in carnivores in Iran. In: Kim W, Pawlowski ZS, editors. Trichinellosis. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England (1978). p. 551–4.

Google Scholar

27. Massoud J, Mahdavi M. Characterization of northern and southern isolates of Trichinella in Iran. Iran J Public Health. (1987) 16:1–4.

Google Scholar

28. Pozio E, La Rosa G, Murrell K, Lichtenfels J. Taxonomic revision of the genus Trichinella. J Parasitol. (1992) 78:654–9. doi: 10.2307/3283540

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Shaikenov B, Boev S. Distribution of trichinella species in the old world. Wiadomości Parazytol. (1983) 29:595–608.

Google Scholar

30. Yousefi H. A case of trichinellosis among stray dogs in Isfahan. Proceedings of the 4th Congress of Parasitology. Vol. 80, Mashad (2003).

Google Scholar

31. Mowlavi G, Massoud J, Rokni M. Herpestes auropunctatus as a new reservoir host of Trichinella spiralis in Iran. Iran J Public Health. (2000) 29:67–70, Pe207.

Google Scholar

32. Merdivenci A, Aleksanyan V, Girisken G, Perk M. Türkiye’de insanda ve yabani domuzda Trichinella spiralis enfeksiyonu bulgusu. İstanbul Üniversitesi Vet Fakültesi Dergisi. (1977) 3:46–71.

Google Scholar

33. Heper Y, Yilmaztepe F, Komitova R, Akalin H, Vutova K, Helvaci S. A trichinosis outbreak caused by wild boar meat in Turkey. Parasite. (2005) 12:191–2. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2005122191

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Ozdemir D, Ozkan H, Akkoc N, Onen F, Gurler O, Sari I, et al. Acute trichinellosis in children compared with adults. Pediatr Infect Dis J. (2005) 24:897–900. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000180514.46871.65

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Turk M, Kaptan F, Turker N, Korkmaz M, El S, Ozkaya D, et al. Clinical and laboratory aspects of a trichinellosis outbreak in Izmir, Turkey. Parasite. (2006) 13:65–70. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2006131065

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Bostan K, Akkaya H, Vuruşaner C, Aksu H. A case of Trichinella spiralis in a fermented sausage. Acta Parasitol. (1999) 23:194–8.

Google Scholar

37. Senlik B, Cirak V, Girisgin O, Akyol CV. Helminth infections of wild boars (Sus scrofa) in the Bursa province of Turkey. J Helminthol. (2011) 85:404–8. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X1000074X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Rommel M. Trichinose beim schwarzwild in der provinz Ankara. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg. (1971) 18:1–3.

Google Scholar

39. Gİrİşgİn O, Gİrİşgİn A, Akyol Ç, Çİmenlİkaya N. Investigation of Trichinella spp. larvae in some wild birds. Harran Üniv Vet Fak Derg. (2021) 10:73–6.

Google Scholar

40. Aypak S, Aysul N, Bakirci S, Karagenç T. Presence of Trichinella sp. in wild boar hunted in the city of Aydin, Turkey tartişma ve sonuç materyal ve metot. Anim Heal Prod Hyg. (2013) 2:203–5.

Google Scholar

41. Zarlenga D, Thompson P, Pozio E. Research in veterinary science Trichinella species and genotypes. Res Vet Sci. (2020) 133:289–96. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.08.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Rostami A, Riahi S, Ghadimi R, Hanifehpour H, Hamidi F, Khazan H, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the global seroprevalence of Trichinella infection among wild boars. Food Control. (2018) 91:404–11. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.04.028

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Mansouri M, Sarkari B, Mowlavi G. Helminth parasites of wild boars, Sus scrofa, in Bushehr province, Southwestern Iran. Iran J Parasitol. (2016) 11:377–82.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

44. Pozio E, Zarlenga D. Recent advances on the taxonomy, systematics and epidemiology of Trichinella. Int J Parasitol. (2005) 35:1191–204. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.07.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Ćirović D, Teodorović V, Vasilev D, Marković M, Ćosić N, Dimitrijević M, et al. A large-scale study of the Trichinella genus in the golden jackal (Canis aureus) population in Serbia. Vet Parasitol. (2015) 15:253–6. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.07.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Sillero-Zubiri C, Hoffmann M, Macdonald D. Canids: Foxes, Wolves, Jackals, and Dogs: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. Gland: IUCN (2004).

Google Scholar

47. Thompson R. Parasite zoonoses and wildlife: one health, spillover and human activity. Int J Parasitol. (2013) 43:1079–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.06.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Wakefield M, Loken B, Hornik R. Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour. Lancet. (2010) 376:1261–71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60809-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Schiavo R. Health Communication: From Theory to Practice. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons (2013).

Google Scholar

50. Unger F, Thanh LN, Tuan HNH, Pham-Duc P, Dang-Xuan S, Nguyen PH, et al. Assessing the impact of educational campaigns on pork-borne parasitic diseases in Hoa Binh, Vietnam. ILRI Res Br. (2021) 8:1–4.

Google Scholar

51. Le T, Vu-Thi N, Dang-Xuan S, Nguyen-Viet H, Pham-Duc P, Nguyen-Thanh L, et al. Seroprevalence and associated risk factors of trichinellosis and T. solium cysticercosis in indigenous pigs in Hoa Binh province, Vietnam. Trop Med Infect Dis. (2022) 7:57. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed7040057

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Omedo M, Ogutu M, Awiti A, Musuva R, Muchiri G, Montgomery S, et al. The effect of a health communication campaign on compliance with mass drug administration for schistosomiasis control in Western Kenya-the SCORE project. Am J Trop Med Hyg. (2014) 91:982–8. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0136

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Prochaska J, DiClemente C. Stages of change in the modification of problem behaviors. Prog Behav Modif. (1992) 28:183–218.

Google Scholar

54. Borhani M, Fathi S, Darabi E, Jalousian F, Simsek S, Ahmed H, et al. Echinococcoses in Iran, Turkey, and Pakistan: old diseases in the new millennium. Clin Microbiol Rev. (2021) 34:e0029020. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00290-20

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Bezerra-Santos M, Mendoza-Roldan J, Thompson R, Dantas-Torres F, Otranto D. Illegal wildlife trade: a gateway to zoonotic infectious diseases. Trends Parasitol. (2021) 37:181–4. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2020.12.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Sharma S, Sharma H, Katuwal H, Chaulagain C, Belant J. People’s knowledge of illegal Chinese pangolin trade routes in Central Nepal. Sustainability. (2020) 12:4900. doi: 10.3390/su12124900

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Kiesecker J, Belden L, Shea K, Rubbo M. Amphibian decline and emerging disease: what can sick frogs teach us about new and resurgent diseases in human populations and other species of wildlife? Am Sci. (2004) 92:138–47. doi: 10.1511/2004.2.138

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Bloomfield L, Mcintosh T, Lambin E. Habitat fragmentation, livelihood behaviors, and contact between people and nonhuman primates in Africa. Landsc Ecol. (2020) 35:985–1000. doi: 10.1007/s10980-020-00995-w

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Rohr J, Barrett C, Civitello D, Craft M, Delius B, Deleo G, et al. Emerging human infectious diseases and the links to global food production. Nat Sustain. (2019) 2:445–56. doi: 10.1038/s41893-019-0293-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Jones K, Patel N, Levy M, Storeygard A, Balk D, Gittleman J, et al. Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature. (2008) 451:990–4. doi: 10.1038/nature06536

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Murray K, Allen T, Loh E, Machalaba C, Daszak P. Food safety risks from wildlife. In: Jay-Russell M, Doyle M, editors. Food Safety Risks From Wildlife. Cham: Springer (2016). p. 31–57. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24442-6_2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Pozio E. Trichinella spp. imported with live animals and meat. Vet Parasitol. (2015) 213:46–55. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.02.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Schmiedel S, Kramme S. Cluster of trichinellosis cases in Germany, imported from Poland. Euro Surveill. (2007) 12:E070719.4. doi: 10.2807/esw.12.29.03240-en

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. IPRC. Hunting Laws in Iran. (2022). Available online at: https://www.ialasia.org/projects/animal-law-in-iran (accessed October 21, 2022).

Google Scholar

65. Holden M, Rhodes J, Biggs D, Mcdonald-madden E, Brink H, Bal P. Increase anti-poaching law-enforcement or reduce demand for wildlife products? A framework to guide strategic conservation investments. Conserv Lett. (2018) 12:1–9. doi: 10.1111/conl.12618

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Houzé S, Ancelle T, Matra R, Boceno C, Carlier Y, Gajadhar A. Trichinellosis acquired in Nunavut, Canada in September 2009: meat from grizzly bear suspected. Eurosurveillance. (2009) 14:1–2.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

67. Ancelle T, De Bruyne A, Poisson D, Dupouy-Camet J. Outbreak of trichinellosis due to consumption of bear meat from Canada, France, September 2005. Eur Commun Dis Bull. (2005) 10:E051013.3. doi: 10.2807/esw.10.41.02809-en

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Britov V, Boev S. Taxonomic rank of various strains of Trichinella and their circulation in nature. Vestn Akad Naitk Kazakhskoi SSR. (1972) 28:27–32.

Google Scholar

69. Garkavi B. The species of Trichinella isolated from wild carnivores. Veterinariia. (1972) 1:90–1.

Google Scholar

70. Ranjbar M, Sarkari B, Mowlavi G, Seifollahi Z, Moshfe A, Abdolahi Khabisi S, et al. Helminth infections of rodents and their zoonotic importance in Boyer-Ahmad district, Southwestern Iran. Iran J Parasitol. (2017) 12:572–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

71. Dodangeh S, Azami D, Daryani A, Gholami S, Sharif M, Mobedi I, et al. Parasitic helminths in wild boars (Sus scrofa) in Mazandaran province, Northern Iran. Iran J Parasitol. (2018) 13:416–22.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

72. Nazli B, İnal T. The occurence of Trichinella spiralis in domestic and wild pigs and in prepared pork products in Turkey. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. (1987) 100:187–90.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Keywords: trichinellosis, Trichinella, epidemiology, Turkey, Iran

Citation: Borhani M, Fathi S, Harandi MF, Simsek S, Ahmed H, Wu X and Liu M (2023) Trichinella infections in animals and humans of Iran and Turkey. Front. Med. 10:1088507. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1088507

Received: 03 November 2022; Accepted: 16 January 2023;
Published: 02 February 2023.

Edited by:

Xiaogang Xiang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China

Reviewed by:

Wei Cong, Shandong University, China
Dong-Hui Zhou, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, China

Copyright © 2023 Borhani, Fathi, Harandi, Simsek, Ahmed, Wu and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Mingyuan Liu, www.frontiersin.org liumy36@163.com

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Download